Skip to main content

Cultural Diplomacy Today: A ‘Culture of Dialogue’ or a ‘Dialogue of Cultures’?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Transnational Sites of China’s Cultural Diplomacy

Abstract

This chapter lays the conceptual foundations for building an understanding of cultural diplomacy. It evaluates the ways in which the idea and practice of cultural diplomacy has developed in both western and non-western (specifically Chinese) contexts, and positions cultural diplomacy within a typology of other communicative activities, such as public diplomacy and cultural relations. Given the Chinese government’s almost uncritical embrace of ‘soft power,’ this chapter considers how these activities advance China’s soft power ambitions, while addressing the difficulties facing China’s cultural diplomacy and evaluating the prospects for overcoming these obstacles through initiatives such as the Confucius Institute.

Taken from M. Berger et al. (2008, 5).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    For the official Chinese response to the unnecessary introduction of ‘sharp power’ in current discussions, see Liu Si’s article ‘Spotlight: Who’s Behind the Term “Sharp Power”?,’ 13 February 2018, available at http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/2018-02/13/c_136972986.htm.

  2. 2.

    In China, these questions become more pressing because of the ethnic diversity of the Chinese ‘nation’ under Han domination (see Tuttle 2015).

  3. 3.

    As Akira Iriye (1997) has recognized, cultural diplomacy has not prevented expanding and deepening nationalism.

  4. 4.

    Paul Simon was criticized for performing alongside South African musicians on his 1986 album, Graceland, and was therefore accused of violating the cultural boycott (see Carlin 2016).

  5. 5.

    A useful and brief outline of the criticisms of the cultural imperialism thesis is provided by Fraser (2003, 166–168).

  6. 6.

    ‘Interview with Zhang Jigang, Deputy Director of the Beijing Olympics Opening Ceremony,’ Liberation Daily, August 1, 2008, quoted in Callahan (2010, 4).

  7. 7.

    China Quarterly Debate a Matter of Principle. Global Times, 20 August 2017. http://www.globaltimes.cn/content/1062304.shtml.

References

  • Arndt, Richard T. 2005. The First Resort of Kings: American Cultural Diplomacy in the Twentieth Century. New York: Potomac Books Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, Maurits, Els van der Plas, Charlotte Huygens, Neila Akrimi, and Cynthia Schneider. 2008. Bridge the Gap or Mind the Gap? Culture in Western-Arab Relations. Clingendael: Netherlands institute of International Relations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, John. 2009. Arts Diplomacy: The Neglected Aspect of Cultural Diplomacy. In Routledge Handbook of Public Diplomacy, eds. N. Snow and P.M. Taylor, 57–59. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callahan, William. 2010. China: The Pessoptimist Nation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlin, Peter A. 2016. Homeward Bound: The Life of Paul Simon. New York: Henry Holt & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Channick, Joan. 2005. The Artist as Cultural Diplomat. May/June: American Theatre Magazine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Hongjun. 2016. Introduction to Cultural Self-Confidence. International Journal of Arts and Commerce 5 (9): 75–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chitty, Naren, Li Ji, Gary D. Rawnsley, and Craig Hayden (eds.). 2016. The Routledge Handbook of Soft Power. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coombs, Philip H. 1964. The Fourth Dimension of Foreign Policy: Educational and Cultural Affairs. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cull, Nicholas J. 2008. Public Diplomacy: Taxonomies and Histories. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 616 (1): 31–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, Milton C. 2003. Cultural Diplomacy and the United States Government: A Survey. Washington, DC: Center for Arts and Culture.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delores, Jacques, et al. 1996. Education: The Treasure Within. Paris: UNESCO Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, Matthew. 2003. Weapons of Mass Distraction: Soft Power and American Empire. New York: Thomas Dunne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, Donald. 2003. Cultural Policy-Making in the Free Trade Era: An Evaluation of the Impact of Current World Trade Organization Negotiations on Audio-visual Industries. International Journal of Cultural Policies 9 (3): 285–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong, Euny. 2014. The Birth of Korean Cool: How One Nation Is Conquering the World Through Its Pop Culture. London: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iriye, Akira. 1997. Cultural Internationalism and World Order. New York: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Hun Shik. 2017. The Korean Wave as Soft Power Public Diplomacy. In The Routledge Handbook of Soft Power, eds. Naren Chitty, Li Ji, Gary D. Rawnsley, and Craig Hayden, 414–424. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klaic, Dragan. 2007. Mobility of Imagination. Budapest: Centre for Arts and Culture, Central European University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Shin-Wha. 2011. The Theory and Reality of Soft Power: Practical Approaches in East Asia. In Public Diplomacy and Soft Power in East Asia, eds. S. J. Lee and Jan Melissen, 11–32. New York: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin K. 2012. Gonggong waijiao zaizhong guoheping jueqizhong de gongneng fenxi [A Functional Analysis of Public Diplomacy Within China’s Peaceful Rise]. In Guoji Guancha [International Observer], February, 72–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lind, Jennifer. 2018. Life in China’s Asia: What Regional Hegemony Would Look Like. Foreign Affairs, March–April, 71–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattern, Janice B. 2005. Why “Soft Power” Isn’t So Soft: Representational Force and the Sociolinguistic Construction of Attraction in World Politics. Millennium—Journal of International Studies 33 (3): 583–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McConnell, David L.M. 2008. Japan’s Image Problem and the Soft Power Solution. In Soft Power Superpowers: Cultural and National Assets of Japan and the United States, eds. Y. Watanabe and D.L. McConnell. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGiffert, Carola (ed.). 2009. Chinese Soft Power and Its Implications for the United States: Competition and Cooperation in the Developing World. Washington, DC: CSIS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melissen, Jan. 2005. The New Public Diplomacy: between Theory and Practice. In The New Public Diplomacy: Soft Power in International Relations, ed. Jan Melissen, 3–27. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, J.M. 1986. International Cultural Relations. London: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ninkovich, Frank. 1966. US Information Policy and Cultural Diplomacy. New York: Foreign Policy Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisbett, Melissa. 2013. New Perspectives on Instrumentalism: An Empirical Study of Cultural Diplomacy. International Journal of Cultural Policy 19 (5): 557–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nye, Joseph S. 2006. Think Again: Soft Power. Foreign Policy. February 23. http://foreignpolicy.com/2006/02/23/think-again-soft-power/.

  • Nye, Joseph S. 2008. Forward. In Soft Power Superpowers: Cultural and National Assets of Japan and the United States, eds. Y. Watanabe and D.L. McConnell, ix–xiv. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pamment, James. 2016. British Public Diplomacy and Soft Power: Diplomatic Influence and the Digital Revolution. London and Santa Monica, CA: Palgrave Macmillan and RAND Occasional Paper, RAND. www.rand.org/pubs/occasional_papers/OP134/index.html.

  • Rawnsley, Gary D. 2015. To Know Us Is to Love Us: Public Diplomacy and International Broadcasting in Contemporary Russia and China. Politics 35 (3–4): 273–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawnsley, Gary D., and C. Ngac. 2017. Vietnamese Cultural Diplomacy: An Emerging Strategy. In The Routledge Handbook of Soft Power, eds. Naren Chitty, Li Ji, Gary D. Rawnsley, and Craig Hayden, 425–440. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawnsley, Gary D. 2018. Challenging the Snake-Oil Salesmen: A Critique of British Approaches to Soft Power. The Journal of International Communication 21 (1): 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rivera, Tim. 2015. Distinguishing Cultural Relations from Cultural Diplomacy. CPD Perspectives on Public Diplomacy. https://www.cultureinexternalrelations.eu/2015/01/20/distinguishing-cultural-relations-from-cultural-diplomacy/.

  • Rose, Martin, and Nick Wadham-Smith. 2004. Mutuality, Trust and Cultural Relations. London: Counterpoint.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothkopf, David. 1997. In Praise of Cultural Imperialism. Foreign Policy (Summer).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shambaugh, David. 2013. China Goes Global: The Partial Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson, John. 1999. Globalization and Culture. London: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuttle, Gray. 2015. China’s Race Problem: How Beijing Represses Minorities. Foreign Affairs, May/June: 39–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Department of State. 2005. Cultural Diplomacy: The Linchpin of Public Diplomacy. Report of the Advisory Committee on Cultural Diplomacy. Washington, DC. http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/54374.pdf.

  • Varma, Pavan. 2007. Culture as an Instrument of Diplomacy. In Indian Foreign Policy: Challenges and Opportunities, eds. A. Sinah and M. Mohta. New Delhi: Academic Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Jian. 2013. Shaping China’s Global Imagination: Branding Nations at the World Expo. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe, Yasushi. 2008. Revisiting Soft Power. Japan Foundation Center for Global Partnership. http://www.cpg.org/articleswindow.php.

  • Wendt, Alexander. 1999. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf Jr., Charles, and Brian Rosen. 2004. Public Diplomacy: How to Think About It and Improve It. Santa Monica: Rand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, Edward. 2012. China’s President Lashes Out at Western Culture. New York Times, 3 January.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, Qizheng. 2012. How China Communicates: Public Diplomacy in a Global Age. Beijing: Foreign Language Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gary Rawnsley .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Rawnsley, G. (2021). Cultural Diplomacy Today: A ‘Culture of Dialogue’ or a ‘Dialogue of Cultures’?. In: Ptáčková, J., Klimeš, O., Rawnsley, G. (eds) Transnational Sites of China’s Cultural Diplomacy. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5592-3_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics