Skip to main content

The Effect of Different Animal Dung in Vermicompost Production Using Eudrilus eugeniae Worm and Spent Mushroom Substrate as Vermicomposting Medium

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Charting the Sustainable Future of ASEAN in Science and Technology

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of different animal dung in vermicompost production using Eudrilus eugeniae worm and spent mushroom substrate (SMS) as a vermicomposting medium. The experiment was carried out for 40 days in completely randomized design (CRD) on four replicates for each treatment. The treatments were T1 (6 SMS + 3 cow dung + 1 chopped banana trunk (CB)), T2 (6 SMS + 3 goat dung + 1 CB), T3 (6 SMS + 3 chicken dung + 1 CB) and T4-Control (6 SMS + 0 animal dung + 1 CB). Data on pH, EC, vermicompost biodegradability coefficient, worm population and reproductive rate were observed. Results showed that the pH of vermicompost after vermicomposting ranges from 7.34 to 6.82 and the EC value was decreased ranging from 32 to 88%. The vermicompost biodegradability coefficient was greater in T4 (0.82), followed by T1 (0.37), T2 (0.36) and T3 (0.13). The population of the worm was higher in T4 (178.75 worms) as compared to T2 (153.75 worms), T1 (153.25 worms) and T3 (10 worms). Results revealed that chicken dung is not a suitable medium to be used as part of a mixture in the vermicomposting medium since it has prevented the reproduction of E. eugeniae worms. Meanwhile, medium with or without cow dung can be used for vermicompost production since the growth rate and the number of the worm were greater in both mediums.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Diaz LF, Savage GM, Eggerth LL, Golueke CG (1996) Solid waste management for economically developing countries. ISWA, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Eklind Y, Kirchmann H (2000) Composting and storage of organic household waste with different litter amendments. II: nitrogen turnover and losses. Bioresour Technol 74(2):125–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Gómez-Brandón M, Lazcano C, Domínguez J (2008) The evaluation of stability and maturity during the composting of cattle manure. Chemosphere 70(3):436–444

    Google Scholar 

  • Garg VK, Chand S, Chhillar A, Yadav A (2005) Growth and reproduction of Eisenia foetida in various animal wastes during vermicomposting. Appl Ecol Environ Res 3(2):51–59. https://doi.org/10.15666/aeer/0302_051059

  • Graff O (1982) Vergleich der Regenwurmarten Eisenia foetida und Eudrilus eugeniae hinsichtlich ihrer Eignung zur Proteingewinnung aus Abfallstoffen. Pedobiologia

    Google Scholar 

  • Garg P, Gupta A, Satya S (2006) Vermicomposting of different types of waste using Eisenia foetida: a comparative study. Biores Technol 97(3):391–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Q, Deng M, Coombes AJ (2017) Evaluation of spent mushroom compost as a container medium for production of seedlings of two oak species. Nat Environ Pollut Technol 16(2):529–534

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim SL, Wu TY (2016) Characterization of matured vermicompost derived from valorization of palm oil mill byproduct. J Agric Food Chem 64(8):1761–1769

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin C (2008) A negative-pressure aeration system for composting food wastes. Biores Technol 99(16):7651–7656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manyuchi MM, Phiri A, Muredzi P, Chitambwe T (2013) Comparison of vermicompost and vermiwash bio-fertilizers from vermicomposting waste corn pulp

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Agriculture (MOA) (2012) Dasar Agromakanan Negara (DAN). Jabatan Penerbitan, Malaysia

    Google Scholar 

  • MOA (2010) Dasar Agromakanan Negara 2011–2020. Kementerian Pertanian Malaysia dan Industri Asas Tani, Malaysia

    Google Scholar 

  • Nath G, Singh K, Singh DK (2009) Chemical analysis of vermicomposts/vermiwash of different combinations of animal, agro and kitchen wastes. Aust J Basic Appl Sci 3(4):3672–3676

    Google Scholar 

  • Ndegwa PM, Thompson SA, Das KC (2000) Effects of stocking density and feeding rate on vermicomposting of biosolids. Biores Technol 71(1):5–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasib NAA, Zakaria Z, Tompang MF, Rahman RA, Othman H (2015) Characterization of biochemical composition for different types of spent mushroom substrate in Malaysia. Malays J Anal Sci 19(1):41–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabrina DT, Hanafi MM, Mahmud TMM, Azwady AN (2009) Vermicomposting of oil palm empty fruit bunch and its potential in supplying of nutrients for crop growth. Compos Sci Util 17(1):61–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma K, Garg VK (2018) Comparative analysis of vermicompost quality produced from rice straw and paper waste employing earthworm Eisenia fetida (Sav.). Biores Technol 250:708–715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh D, Suthar S (2012) Vermicomposting of herbal pharmaceutical industry waste: earthworm growth, plant-available nutrient and microbial quality of end materials. Biores Technol 112:179–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh RP, Embrandiri A, Ibrahim MH, Esa N (2011) Management of biomass residues generated from palm oil mill: vermicomposting a sustainable option. Resour Conserv Recycl 55(4):423–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viljoen SA, Reinecke AJ (1989) Life-cycle of the African nightcrawler, Eudrilus eugeniae (Oligochaeta). Afr Zool 24(1):27–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams BC, McMullan JT, McCahey S (2001) An initial assessment of spent mushroom compost as a potential energy feedstock. Biores Technol 79:227–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yadav A, Garg VK (2011) Vermicomposting–an effective tool for the management of invasive weed Parthenium hysterophorus. Biores Technol 102(10):5891–5895

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Norhanani Ahmad .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ahmad, N., Sukri, N.M., Samsuddin, N.Z. (2020). The Effect of Different Animal Dung in Vermicompost Production Using Eudrilus eugeniae Worm and Spent Mushroom Substrate as Vermicomposting Medium. In: Alias, N., Yusof, R. (eds) Charting the Sustainable Future of ASEAN in Science and Technology . Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-3434-8_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-3434-8_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-3433-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-3434-8

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics