Abstract
In recent decades, the range of nanoparticles that have been authorized by many biomedical agencies globally has increased exponentially. In their therapeutic and treatment potentials, nanoparticles have gained greater importance in drug delivery because of their carrying capacity, stability, and specificity. Thus, understanding the broad spectrum of nano-bio interactions and the challenges of the interface may provide new opportunities for novel designing of nano-based materials for different biological applications. Caenorhabditis elegans (C. elegans) as a model organism has gained popularity, and its feasibility as an in vivo model has also been extended to nano-biotechnology. In the process, understanding the basic biology of C. elegans as a model system before the elucidation process of various biological activities of nanoparticles is critical for productivity and translational capability. The applicability of different high-end chemical-based and material science techniques in studying modes of nanoparticle exposure and their routes of absorption, bio-distribution, and excretion has made the process of nano-bio interaction studies in C. elegans model more accurate and informative. Furthermore, major factors affecting nano-bio interactions which might hinder the interactions of the model system such as the alterations in media, growth conditions, chemical composition, etc. are highlighted. The final discussion pertains to commonly reported biological activities of different nanoparticles using this model organism such as antioxidants, antimicrobial, toxicity studies, etc. The advantages and disadvantages of different reported activities of nanoparticles as elucidated from this model organism are also elaborated.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Nanoparticle
- C. elegans
- Nano-bio interactions
- Factors affecting the interactions
- Techniques
- Biological activities
8.1 Introduction
Modern advances in nanoscience and nanotechnology fields have seen faster development of various novel applications of nanoparticles ranging from electronic appliances to pharmaceutical industry and biomedical sciences. Nanotechnology represents new ways to perturb cells and treat patients, through novel designing of specific nano-based therapeutics that can target diseased cells directly, bypassing unwanted biological barriers. In this process, elucidation of these effects requires functional characterization of the different nano-bio interactions in a complete in vivo model organism. This will allow for an in-depth understanding of the broad spectrum of interactions in an active living organism. Thus, knowledge obtained after its safety validations in vivo would pave a way for the productivity of new nano-based materials in the market for various useful applications.
In the field of biomedical sciences, researchers are currently employing the unique design of these entities in a size range of 1–100 nm for their potential in improving novel targeted therapeutics and for accurate diagnostics. Thus, priorities should be made to identify routes of exposure and absorption and the consequences from their biological effects either after short- or long-term exposure. The basic framework for understanding nano-bio interfaces represents many challenges. An approach in measurement and detection of the interactions in nanoscale range with single-cell requires exquisite sensitivity both in vitro and in vivo. Similarly, it is equally important to have an in-depth understanding of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the whole process right from its uptake, bio-distribution, and translocation to excretion. Thus, translating these proofs of concept in nanotechnology from a controlled laboratory environment to widespread usage will require extensive testing and validations.
In terms of practicality, model organisms have always played a vital role in the field of discovery and research. The popularity and fitness of Caenorhabditis elegans (C. elegans) as an in vivo model in screening and evaluation of nanoparticles have increased exponentially in recent years (Zhao et al. 2013). The ability of worms to self-fertilize and generate large numbers of progeny aided with the presence of complex tissue systems is ideal for different biological studies in terms of both mechanistic and high-throughput screening approaches.
8.2 Caenorhabditis elegans: A Model Organism
Caenorhabditis elegans (C. elegans) was introduced in 1965 by Sydney Brenner as the whole model organism for studying developmental genetics. Since then, the utility of this model animal has been expanded to explore diverse areas of modern biology and allied sciences. It is a free-living, soil-loving nematode (roundworm) measuring 1 mm in length. It is non-parasitic and likes to live and thrive in temperate/warm soil environments. In the laboratory, it is maintained and cultured on nematode growth media (NGM) plates and fed with E. coli OP50 as diet source (Fig. 8.2). The body of these animals is transparent that enables tracking of an individual cell and cell lineages. Due to its shorter life span, it’s well suited for aging studies and is also widely used in neurological and host-pathogen interaction studies as a model organism (Horvitz and Sulston 1980). As a host model, it has been employed in studying microbial and parasitic infections. Similarly, C. elegans is at the forefront of high-throughput screening (HTS) for evaluations of biological activities of various chemicals, drugs, and nanoparticles (Brenner 1974; Brinke et al. 2011).
8.2.1 Origin
Rhabditis elegans was the initial name of Caenorhabditis elegans, and this name was coined by Maupas in 1900. In 1952, Osche later placed it in the subgenus Caenorhabditis which was later promoted to the generic status in 1955 by Dougherty. N2 wild type was an isolate reference that was first obtained from mushroom compost of England by L. N. Staniland in 1965. A laboratory strain was obtained from Bristol culture by Sydney Brenner in 1964 from Dougherty. It is assumed to share a common ancestor with humans, 500–600 million years ago during the pre-Cambrian era (Fig. 8.1).
8.2.2 C. elegans Tissues and Body Plan
Despite its simple body, C. elegans has some well-characterized and well-defined tissues. The worm body is a tubular structure, with a cuticle forming the external surface and skeleton necessary for its movement. Its basic body system which includes the nervous, alimentary, reproductive, and excretory systems is protected by a collagenous cuticle. The alimentary system of C. elegans consists of organs like the mouth, pharynx, intestine, rectum, and anus. The digestive system is organized in the form of a tube covering the whole length of the animal and is made up of a pairwise arrangement of 20 long polyploidy epithelial cells. The excretory system is considered to regulate osmolality and waste elimination from the body. It has muscles, a hypodermis, a cuticle (body)-protective covering, connective tissues, and basement membranes. Gaseous exchange and nutrient supply occur through the body cavity by passive diffusion especially through the cuticle layer of the gut surface, since they lack circulatory system (Altun et al. 2009; Kerr 2006).
In a mixed population of C. elegans, both male (XO) and the self-fertilizing hermaphrodite (XX) sexes are seen. After the L4 stage, the worm becomes an adult egg-laying organism of 1 mm long with ~959 cell nuclei, of which 302 are neurons. On the other hand, males have 1031 cell nuclei and can be produced rarely at about 0.1% spontaneously from nondisjunction of the X chromosome and/or up to 50% of the outcross progeny from a mating between a hermaphrodite and a male worm. Slight modifications in reproductive systems of hermaphrodite and male are observed with hermaphrodite having a uterus, gonad, spermatheca, and vulva (Sternberg 2005), whereas the male has gonad, cloaca, vas deferens, and seminal vesicle (Emmons 2005). Although both adult male and hermaphrodite have the same body length, phenotypically they can be differentiated with the presence of male worm with unique features such as blunt tail with rays, the spicules, the hook, a proctodeum, and a thinner body (Fig. 8.2).
Inside the alimentary tract lies a pseudocoelomic fluid called coelomocytes which houses the main organ systems besides its roles in endocytosis and fluid balance (Corsi et al. 2015). Furthermore, due to the lack of circulatory system, this pseudocoelomic fluid performs additional homeostatic roles ranging from lubrication of different tissues, trace metal enrichment of fluid, and maintenance of hydrostatic pressure balance in the worm body. It also serves as a medium for cell-to-cell communication, signal networking, and the passive diffusion and transport of O2, CO2, and nutrients (Wood 1988). Well-defined tissues with similar architectures of organs like intestines, muscles, pharynx, and hypodermis and gonads of higher organisms are also present in C. elegans. Thus, their presence allows for understanding the specific molecular interactions of different nanoparticles that can perturb/affect cellular physiology. Subcellular changes can also be used as parameters for an in-depth understanding of the process involved (Garigan et al. 2002; Herndon et al. 2002; Golden et al. 2007; Haithcock et al. 2005).
8.2.3 Reproductive System
The existence of two sexes, which include the most common hermaphrodite (XX) and the rare occurrence male (XO), has given rise to the phenomenon of sexual dimorphism. A highly sexually dimorphic tissue in the worm is the reproductive system which differs between hermaphrodites and males. The space for fertilization and laying eggs is provided by the hermaphrodite, and this is divided into three distinct major parts consisting of the somatic gonad, germline, and egg-laying apparatus. The germline of an adult is well organized into a distal space corresponding to the distal end and the proximal space which lies near the embryo exit point from the worm. As they move to the proximal part, they can enter into different stages of meiosis. The somatic gonad comprises the spermatheca, gonadal sheath, distal tip cell, and uterus. The egg-laying apparatus is made of the vulva and the muscles of the uterine. Hermaphrodites are considered to be the self-fertilized female because the soma is female. However, the germline produces male gametes in a fixed number before the production of female gametes (L’Hernault 1997; Schedl 1997). They produce ~300 embryos through self-fertilization process. During copulation, male-derived fertilization takes place, and maturation occurs in the spermatheca (Singson 2001). A fertilized egg then passes onto the uterus, and the egg-laying apparatus makes the egg to move out through an opening ventrally called the vulva.
8.2.4 Alimentary System
The complex system in the worm’s anatomy is the alimentary system with various tissues and cells (White 1988). The connections between the body and the alimentary system network are less but direct. The worm has a cylindrical body wall with an epithelial tube divided by a pseudocoelomic space which is parallel to the gonads. The system has anterior and posterior regions. The pharyngeal epithelium connecting the arcade cells of the lips is the anterior region, and the posterior region ends up in the rectal epithelium and anus. This system which comprises 127 cells is also divided into 3 major parts such as the foregut, midgut, and hindgut. During molts, the stomodeum and proctodeum (parts of the foregut and midgut) line along with the cuticle (Bird and Bird 1991). The stomodeum has the openings for the pharyngeal glands, while the proctodeum has the openings for the rectal glands. C. elegans intestine shares similar cellular architecture with higher animals in respect to cell polarity of the intestinal cells (enterocytes), apical and basolateral domains, cell junctions, and microvilli forming the brush border. Ingested food materials reach the intestine through anterior pumping and peristalsis of the pharynx, and the excretory materials are eliminated out through the anal opening. The muscles of the body also have a role in controlling the internal pressure and concentration of contents in the guts before excretion of waste from the body (Bird and Bird 1991). The excretory system is a unicellular tubular system comprising three different individual unicellular tubes such as the canal, duct, and pore connected to form a continuous lumen in the body (Nelson et al. 1983).
8.2.5 Nervous System
The hermaphroditic adult nervous system is comprised of 302 neurons that can be subdivided into 3 unique and independent systems, with a larger somatic system of 282 neurons and a smaller pharyngeal nervous system (Ward et al. 1975; Sulston and Horvitz 1977; Sulston et al. 1983; White et al. 1986). Majority of neurons in the somatic nervous system lie between the hypodermis and body muscles separated by the basal lamina. On the other hand, pharyngeal neurons are directly located in the pharyngeal muscles and are not divided by any basal lamina. Worm neuronal system has 1500 neuromuscular junctions, 900 gap junctions, and 6400 chemical synapses (Durbin 1987). The male population has 473 additional cells, 79 neurons, and 36 supporting cells than the hermaphrodites. These additional cells have roles in enhancing the male mating behavior (Sulston et al. 1980; Emmons and Lipton 2003; Emmons 2005). This nervous system can manage complex behaviors along with basic behaviors such as feeding, defecation, locomotion, etc. (Bono and Villu Maricq 2005). It also allows the animal to find the presence of nearby diffusible sex pheromone signals or simply to sense changes in the O2 levels (Jeong et al. 2005). Both sexes have some sex-specific behaviors such as egg-laying and mating behaviors (Schafer 2005).
8.2.6 C. elegans Life Cycle
Perhaps, the best utility of this organism is due to its ease of growing and maintenance in the laboratory besides its simple and short life cycle. The reproductive life cycle of C. elegans is about approximately 72–120 h, and its life span is about 2–3 weeks under proper living conditions at 20 °C. During its life cycle, it has to undergo through four larval stages of development designated as L1–L4, and its reproductive phase is temperature-dependent (García-Sancho 2012). Embryonic development proceeds with the generation of an L1 larva which is about 0.25 mm long and is made up of 550 cells; later 131 cells die during the developmental process through apoptosis (Elmore 2007). On maturity, adult worms become fertile for 4 days, and each adult hermaphrodite can lay ~200–300 eggs. Alternatively, when the prevailing environmental condition is not favorable (i.e., insufficient food, temperature changes, and overpopulation), the late L1 stage nematodes can enter into dauer stage. In this stage, worms require lesser nutrients and are resistant to environmental stresses. When favorable condition returns, it reenters the normal life cycle directly to the L4 stage from the dauer stage (Klass 1977; Kenyon et al. 1993; Williams et al. 2017) (Fig. 8.3).
8.2.7 Homologous Genes and Genetic Manipulation
The first organism to be sequenced at the multicellular level (1998) was C. elegans. With approximately more than 20,000 genes and with the genome size of more than 100 million base pairs, there are substantial numbers of overlaps and conservative regions among C. elegans and human genes (Hodgkin 2005). It also exhibits greater levels of conservatives with other vertebrates in terms of gene functions and metabolic pathways. Algorithm-based studies have reported that greater than 60% of these genes are homologous to humans (Kaletta and Hengartner 2006). These characteristics make it a suitable model organism to study functional genomics and to get knowledge of the genotypic and phenotypic relationships at a genomic level globally. Furthermore, these insights on multiple biological processes and roles can be correlated to human disease genes which are homologous of C. elegans (Bird et al. 1999; Corsi 2006; Walhout 2006).
In a multicellular organism, an important penetration into functions of genes comes from the prevailing environmental conditions during which a gene gets expressed. At the forefront, gene expression studies and analysis in C. elegans have several advantages over other species. The availability of its entire genome sequence has provided a simplified functional genomic approach, where manipulations like forward and reverse genetics can be carried out with ease. Strategies that can generate valuable information on expression patterns of various genes in correspondence to different manipulations and amelioration studies have been facilitated. Additionally, by tagging a gene of interest with a reporter gene of green fluorescent protein (GFP), real-time monitoring of expression patterns can be carried out both qualitatively and quantitatively. These approaches of in vivo GFP labeling methods can also give accurate information on the localization of the translated product of a particular gene which can be visualized in live worms. As a result of the Promoterome project, GFP fusions with promoters are being created on a genome-wide scale that led to the development of promoter fusions up to 2 kb from the nematode genes (Dupuy et al. 2004). Another commonly used approach to find the unknown functions of a gene comes from the usage of available C. elegans mutant strains. The RNA interference (RNAi) and sequence-specific degradation of homologous messenger RNAs produced by double-stranded RNA were also regularly used to inhibit a particular gene function in C. elegans. Understanding of worm’s biology through gene manipulation techniques like RNAi knockdowns, reporter gene assays, and protein-protein interaction networks has contributed to the proper understanding of basic and translational biology immensely (Timmons and Fire 1998).
8.2.8 High-Throughput Screening
Employing model organisms in high-throughput screening (HTS) is a useful strategy to facilitate the screening of genes or molecules related to basic biology or disease pathogenesis in humans. C. elegans is ideal for HTS screens because a large number of worms can go in a single well, of its transparent body, and it is easy to grow and manipulate. This allows for the design and in-depth dissections of fundamental and conserved biological processes like apoptosis (Ellis et al. 1986) and gene regulation by small RNAs (Fire et al. 1998; Wightman et al. 1993). A recent study using HTS suggests that the intensity of the fluorescent dye Nile red (lipid stain) corresponds with the rate of aging in the animals (O’Rourke et al. 2009). Worms with lesser Nile red signal age more slowly, and animals with increased Nile red signal live shorter than the wild type. Analyses of these HTS experiments were done using two types of imaging techniques including bright-field and fluorescence (FL) imaging. Bright-field images notify about developmental and gross anatomical defects, and FL images display the distribution of Nile red dye in the worm’s body (O‘Rourke et al. 2009).
An all-liquid workflow to promote HTS in C. elegans in a 96-well form was also developed (Lehner et al. 2006). This method was originally intended to promote genome-wide RNAi screens in a high-throughput mode but now has wider applications. For example, the first HTS approach using C. elegans was done in 2006. Kwok and co-workers used worm transfer units of a Complex Object Parametric Analyzer and Sorter (COPAS™ BIOSORT, Union Biometrica) and semi-automated image recovery to screen approximately 14,100 smaller molecules. Molecules were evaluated for different bioactivities by assessing morphological deformities, including slowness of growth, lethality, improper movement, and other phenotypes in wild-type animals. Using this technique, ~308 bioactive molecules were identified. Since this was the first example of HTS screen using C. elegans, the screening was done on agar plates (24-well), and phenotypes were marked visually. Furthermore, to enhance the pace and development in C. elegans genetic research, libraries covering almost 94% of the 20,000 genes have been established and are also available for researchers (Kamath and Ahringer 2003; Rual 2004; Lamitina et al. 2006).
8.3 Practical Considerations for C. elegans as In Vivo Model
Significant delays in our understanding of the different biological activities of different nanoparticles exist. When tested in higher mammalian in vivo models, serious considerations that hinder the process include a shortage in the number of experimental animals, time factor, cost-effectiveness, and ethical procedures. Importantly, with no ethical constraints and ease of cultivation, C. elegans counteracts the limitations of many other in vivo models favorably. In the laboratory setting, an invertebrate model such as C. elegans has the advantage of getting numbers of animals assigned for the experiment because each adult hermaphrodite can reproduce about ~300 progeny with a life span of only 2–3 weeks. Thus, end numbers of different animals with different stages can be rapidly generated at the minimum cost and time involved. The ease of culturing the worms in either liquid or solid NGM and the minimum requirement of the non-pathogenic bacterium E. coli OP50 strain as a standardized food source have further reduced the cost involved. Additionally, for long-term usage, cultures can be easily stored and preserved at −80 °C in 96- or 384-well plates.
The blend of small size (1 mm in adult hermaphrodite) and transparent body of C. elegans is also ideal for the normal optical microscopic study even to the single-cell level. Their transparency permits visualization of their various anatomical structures even without dissection and permits colored materials to pass all over their body even without staining (Contag 2002; Pomper and Lee 2005). Due to their smaller size, worms in large numbers can be put in a single petri dish or 96- or 384-well plates which fits high-throughput experiment needs (Stiernagle 2006). Recently, based on their micrometric size from embryo to adulthood, microfluidic platforms have been developed where microfluidic device enables for real-time monitoring of the different parameters of the worms’ population. This is advantageous from different aspects of time and precision. For example, toxicological profiling of a number of test materials can be done in a high-throughput and computerized manner (Altun et al. 2009; Hulme and Whitesides 2011; San-Miguel and Lu 2013) (Fig. 8.4).
Most importantly, because of its multicellular nature and the availability of complex multiple organ systems, the chances of identifying a particular nanoparticle target and its interactions with biological molecules can be correlated. Further confirmation studies can be carried out in the complex multicellular organisms like humans. For example, with its functions and composition similar to that of human skin, the external part of worms epithelial and cuticle layer can be used as a simple epidermal model to assess nanoparticle routes of entry and absorption and for an in-depth analysis of its positive or negative effects (Chisholm and Xu 2012). Similarly, the C. elegans intestinal cellular architecture, patterning, and growth allow for the detailed examination of delivery or entry of nanoparticles orally (Bossinger and Hoffm 2012). Therefore, C. elegans is a sensitive and feasible whole animal model system to study the interactions of nanoparticles with various biological barriers like cuticle and intestine and through various levels of organizations ranging from a single cell to the whole organism (Fig. 8.4).
8.4 Nano-Bio Interactions: Features of C. elegans
Understanding the different interactions of various nanoparticles with multicellular organisms is still in progress. Thus, assessment of interactions between different nanoparticles and C. elegans often serves as information-rich resources for an in vivo behavior and biocompatibility of different nanoparticles. Processes such as uptake, distribution, aggregation, surface adherence, and agglomeration on the exposure of C. elegans to nanoparticles have been regularly monitored. Similarly, the roles of different physicochemical properties of nanoparticles on its interactions with C. elegans have been reported.
8.4.1 Exposure of Worms
Exposure of worms to nanoparticle is an essential step in studying nano-bio interactions of various nanoparticles starting from the time of its exposure till excretion. Different exposure routes for C. elegans can be either in the form of a direct mode of oral feeding, through topical applications, or in some organ-specific cases through microinjection. This exposure can also be in the form of acute and chronic exposure and high-dose and low-dose regimen. Thus, choosing the correct exposure route, concentration, and time is a critical step in determining successful nanoparticle bio-interactions when it is carried out for the first time. Practically, the number of worms required for the study can be obtained by rinsing the worms from NGM plates with Milli-Q water or any buffer of choice. Worm pellets can be concentrated with low-speed centrifugations to the desired number of the worm population before nanoparticle exposure. For larger-population exposure, 24- or 96-well plates with equal volumes in each well can be used to check for the general uptake and bio-distribution of particles (Moragas 2016) (Fig. 8.5).
8.4.2 Uptake, Absorption, Translocation, and Bio-distribution
The uptake of the nanoparticles mainly depends on their physicochemical properties like surface chemistry, size, and shape. In C. elegans, nanoparticles are commonly taken through the alimentary system during feeding. Additionally, some studies have shown that nanoparticles can diffuse in worms directly through the cuticle, vulva, anus, and excretory pores (Scharf et al. 2013). In C. elegans, the outermost layer of the cuticle contains a negative charge due to the presence of glycoproteins. These negative charges can electrostatically interact with a nanoparticle, which influences its effect on entry into C. elegans (Fig. 8.5). For example, superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs) can be absorbed through the worm’s epithelial surface (Gonzalez-Moragas et al. 2015).
In the alimentary system, nanoparticle interacts with the pharynx. The pharynx is an encapsulated organ with two muscles, and their movements are necessary for food ingestion and pharyngeal pumping (Song et al. 2013). It was reported that nanoparticle (30 nm–3 μm) can pass through the grinder to interact with pharyngeal epithelium where it will get either attached to it or taken up directly by epithelial cells (e.g., quantum dots) (Fang-Yen et al. 2009; Wu et al. 2018). Thus, the pharyngeal pumping rate can be used as an indicator for evaluating nanoparticle interactions with C. elegans. For example, silica (Si), silver (Ag), and titanium (Ti) nanoparticles have been reported to interact with the pharynx that resulted in dysfunction or pre-mature reduction of pharyngeal pumping (Scharf et al. 2013; Iannarelli et al. 2016). In the reproductive system, nanoparticles generally get localized after their direct translocation from the alimentary system and rarely get ejected from the vulva. Nanoparticles were also reported to have the capability of translocation, and this, in turn, affects the progeny and reproductive system of the worms (Laromaine 2015). In the nervous system, the interactions of Si nanoparticles with the neuronal cells have led to the segregation of proteins predominantly involved in homeostasis as reported. This observed widespread protein aggregation in axons of serotonergic HSN neurons resulted in a decline of egg-laying capacity and induces internal hatch of worms (Scharf et al. 2015).
A clear comprehension of the route of absorption and modes of bio-distribution of nanoparticles in a living organism is also crucial. C. elegans offers an advantage through its transparency and the oral route of entry for nanoparticles. On entry, these nanoparticles pass through the alimentary path in either the presence or absence (±) of E. coli OP50. Irrespective of solid or liquid media, there were speculations suggesting that E. coli OP50 can absorb and decrease the nanoparticle concentration in the suspension. On the contrary, other experiments based on the discharge of metal ions from nanoparticles in both ± of E. coli OP50 highlighted that the live bacterial metabolism has a lesser influence on nanoparticles (Gonzalez-Moragas et al. 2017).
Notably, Ag nanoparticles and quantum dots have been reported to be diffused in C. elegans intestine, subcutaneous tissue, gut lumen, and gonad along with the huge amount of nanoparticles observed to be deposited in the tail (Wu et al. 2014; Luo et al. 2016; Zhi et al. 2016). For those nanoparticles that can enter the membrane layers of cells, delocalization and accumulation in the lysosomes of C. elegans were also reported (Wang et al. 2016; Chatterjee et al. 2017; Yu et al. 2016). Some ingested nanoparticles could be seen in the digestive system, starting from the pharynx, intestinal lumen, and rectum besides other organs, like the neurons, muscles, spermatheca, and gonad by crossing their barriers (Qu et al. 2018). In some other reports applying two-photon luminescence microscopy and absorbance microspectroscopy, it was observed that Au nanoparticles ingested by C. elegans get accumulated in the intestine but were not internalized by the intestinal cells (Moragas 2016).
8.4.3 Recovery and Excretion of Nanoparticles from C. elegans
The role of feeding the worms with E. coli OP50 plays a vital role in the excretion of nanoparticles. Most of the nanoparticles remain in the body even after defecation, inferring that the worms do not have a preference for the excretion of nanoparticles. In the absence of E. coli OP50, the defecation process ceases which leads to the accumulation of the nanoparticles in the gut. Once the animal starts to feed on E. coli OP50, the nanoparticles get excreted out (Mohan et al. 2010; Le Trequesser et al. 2014). Previous studies have shown that the excretion of nanoparticles such as nanodiamonds, Fe2O3 nanoparticles, and Au nanoparticles also depends on food availability and even some of the nanoparticles can increase the defecation cycle duration by 80 s. All these experimental results corroborate that caution must be taken in the evaluation of nanoparticles with or without the presence of food in the experimental setup (Fig. 8.5).
8.5 Major Factors Affecting Nano-Bio Interactions in C. elegans
8.5.1 Effect of Life Span and Period of the Exposure
With worms having four different larval stages, 4 days of active egg-laying period, and a life span of around ~2–3 weeks, exposure of nanoparticles to different worm’s population would yield different results. Studies have shown that L3 worms were more resistant than L1 upon exposure with cerium oxide (CeO2) nanoparticle (4 nm) (Collin et al. 2016). Similarly, the L4 or adult worms were more resistant than L1 upon exposure to titanium oxide (TiO2) nanoparticles (10 nm), and the outcome also relies on time (Zhao et al. 2015). The effects of iron oxide (Fe2O3) nanoparticles coated with dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) in K-medium were shown in three assay systems such as in 24 h treatment with L4 worms, 3-day treatment (L1 to adult), and treatment from L1 to 8-day-old adult. Higher toxicity was observed with increasing time and at a concentration greater than 50 mg/ml (Wu et al. 2012). TiO2 nanoparticles show variations in recovery response after acute and chronic treatment in C. elegans wherein chronically exposed worms ingested more particles and presented themselves with a reduction in movement, excretion, length (body), and pharyngeal pumping when compared to acutely exposed worms (Yang et al. 2014).
8.5.2 Effect of Exposure in Solid Media
During NGM preparation if the nanoparticles are added directly to the medium, it is difficult to confirm the uniformity of particle distribution in the medium fed with the E. coli OP50. The solid nature and the ionic strength of the medium can also enhance the colloidal nature of the nanoparticles. Further aggregations can prevent nanoparticles’ homogenous distribution from the worms. Thus, care should be taken when the exposure medium is in the form of a solid NGM plate for non-homogenous exposure and that the desired concentration is calculated with precision. Furthermore, the role of live bacteria added as food can perturb the medium biological surface. Bacteria with active metabolism can produce variable outcomes that can change the variability of biological surfaces before and after treatment in C. elegans. To overcome these challenges, applications of alternative media with lesser ionic strength were suggested, and these were found to reduce nanoparticle aggregations or precipitation. Some researchers suggested for the application of K-agar over NGM agar. Its high phosphate content allows for interactions with positive charges, and this reduces its availability for unwanted interactions (Maurer et al. 2015). Similarly, acute exposures (≤24 h) in liquid media without food or chronic exposures (≥48 h) in liquid media (K-medium or S basal) along with food supplementation (Kim et al. 2008; Meyer et al. 2010) have also been reported (Tsyusko et al. 2012; Lim et al. 2012) (Fig. 8.6).
8.5.3 Effect of Exposure in Liquid Media
Liquid media have the advantages of uniform nanoparticle exposure and are ideal for different high-throughput studies. However, it can have its disadvantages because of varied ionic strengths that can be used in the maintenance of C. elegans under laboratory conditions (Stiernagle 2006). Generally, media with lesser ionic strength are preferred as these can help in maintaining the stability of nanoparticles (M9 buffer, S basal, or K-medium). Interestingly, some studies have shown that the Ag nanoparticle aggregation can take place in K-medium which immediately settles from suspension (Meyer et al. 2010; Ellegaard et al. 2012). The effect of ionic strength on the exposure media in Ag nanoparticle toxicity was also reported, in which lethal doses of 1.5–12-fold higher in low salt containing moderately hard reconstituted water (MHRW) were obtained when compared to K-medium. This decrease in toxicity due to aggregation was followed by the decrease in surface area for their distribution (Yang et al. 2012) (Fig. 8.6).
Another study has shown lesser toxicity even in the presence of salts (ultrapure water and K-medium) when the worms were treated with ZnO nanoparticles (Wang et al. 2009) conflicting to the previous studies reported. Thus, reducing the time of exposure or the ionic strength has also a major role in preventing aggregation of nanoparticles. Precipitation and aggregation of CeO2 and TiO2 nanoparticles in K-medium were also reported at higher concentrations used. Exposure to a lower dose without E. coli OP50 for 24 h is ideal for the uniformity and stability of the particle suspensions during this experiment (Roh et al. 2010).
8.5.4 Effect of Organic Components/Food
There were conflicting reports on the effect of E. coli OP50 on the stability and activities of different nanoparticles during experimentation. The addition of E. coli in the medium, especially in the K-medium, was reported to have enhanced the toxicity of Ag nanoparticles in the worms due to the increase in their bioavailability (Ellegaard-Jensen et al. 2012). Toxic effects of polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP)-coated Ag nanoparticles in MHRW with organic matter (natural) along with the E. coli were also reported (Yang et al. 2014). On the contrary, some studies have shown that the addition of food can lead to a decreased toxicity of nanoparticles (Fig. 8.6).
8.5.5 Effect of Exposure in Standard Conditions
Exposure of nanoparticles even in standardized conditions can have different effects on different nanoparticles, and this indicates the uniqueness of a particular nanoparticle. Pluskota et al. (2009) showed that there was a monodispersion of SiO2 nanoparticles and polystyrene (PS) nanoparticles in a suspended solution using fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS). The effect was observed after the addition of nanoparticles as a solution along with the bacterial lawn (Pluskota et al. 2009). Polak et al. (2014) showed the different physicochemical properties of ZnO nanoparticle suspension in bacterial culture before the addition into NGM plates for nematode exposure. In LB broth, ZnO nanoparticles formed clusters (agglomerate) with time-dependent variations. Further, TEM investigations revealed that cluster formation resulted in decreased surface charge and weaker electrostatic repulsive force of nanoparticles. Additionally, these clusters did not affect the entry or morphology of bacteria but instead enhance the secretion of polymeric substances which coats the particles within 24 h to influence on their bioavailability (Polak et al. 2014) (Fig. 8.6).
8.5.6 Physicochemical Properties of the Nanoparticles
Smaller Ag nanoparticles (10–21 nm) were reported to have been ingested more when compared to larger-sized particle (>75 nm) in K-medium (Meyer et al. 2010). The uptake of polyethylene glycol (PEG)-coated Ag nanoparticles was shown by Contreras et al. (2014), wherein a lesser amount of Ag was internalized in worms when the worms were exposed to smaller-sized nanoparticles than the larger-sized particles. This may be due to the excretion of the smaller-sized nanoparticles. Further studies have shown that there were variations in life span and fertility of worms after frequent exposures to nanoparticles and the same treatment does not have an effect on their body length and movement (Contreras et al. 2014). Similarly, PVP Ag nanoparticles (28 nm) cause higher worm mortality than smaller-sized (1 nm) Ag nanoparticles, and this was associated with a combining effect of higher intake rates, coating, and solubility (Ellegaard-Jensen et al. 2012). On the contrary, in an assessment of Ag nanoparticles of 1–75 nm, no inhibition on growth and size was observed suggesting that there are correlations that exist between dissolved silver and its toxicity. Altogether, these investigations gave us a rough idea of size-dependent intake, reproductive toxicity, and life span effects of nanoparticles besides its effects on motility and body size.
8.5.7 Chemical Composition
The translocation rate of nanoparticles also depends on their composition. Some comparative studies conducted on fluorescently labeled SiO2 (50 nm), Si, and polystyrene (PS) nanoparticles have reported for the major distribution of Si-based nanoparticles in the lumen of the intestine (primary organ), while other nanoparticles like PS nanoparticles were found in secondary organs and in the cytoplasm of the immature embryos (Pluskota et al. 2009). The toxic levels of TiO2, ZnO, and SiO2 nanoparticles were also reported to be fully dependent on their composition (Nouara et al. 2013) (Fig. 8.6).
8.5.8 Effect of Surface Coating and Manipulations
The coating of the surface can significantly alter the toxic levels of nanoparticles by hampering the nanoparticle uptake, bioavailability, and reactivity. To access control over the nano-bio interactions, modifications have to be done properly after synthesis in the animal itself or the environment of nanoparticle engineering. Studies by Collin et al. (2014) have shown the effects of surface charge on nanoparticle toxicity and its accumulation in organs and tissues using 4 nm dextran-coated CeO2 nanoparticles. The neutral and negative charge carrying nanoparticles exhibit lesser toxicity when compared to positively charged CeO2 nanoparticles which can be found throughout the animal’s body. This finding demonstrated that the higher toxicity of positively charged nanoparticles was due to their direct interaction and disruption of the cell membrane besides an increase in their cellular uptake (Collin et al. 2014).
8.6 C. elegans Assays for the Biological Activity of Nanoparticles
The contributions of different researchers with years and years of research in C. elegans have led to the development of various assays and standardized protocols that were time tested. They are ideal for the screening of different nanoparticles. Most of these assays are designed to evaluate on C. elegans organ systems, including the neural system, digestive system, immune system, and reproductive system (Handy et al. 2012; Marsh and May 2012; Hunt 2017). The information collected from these findings can be extrapolated and further confirmed in higher vertebrate systems. Thus, C. elegans is a reliable and valuable experimental biological platform to evaluate the efficiency of a novel nanoparticle. With the availability of different organs and tissue systems, the targeted biological activity of a particular nanoparticle can also be evaluated specifically. For example, C. elegans intestinal enterocytes, cell junctions, and microvilli can be evaluated for the biological effect of nanoparticles on intestinal uptake and integrity. Similarly, to evaluate the effects of nanoparticles on the worm’s physiology and metabolism, a simple experiment like monitoring of its pharyngeal pumping rate can be performed.
Generally, upon nanoparticle exposure, survival and mortality rate measurements are performed most frequently for determining the overall fitness and life span of C. elegans. This can generate a concentration-response and survival analysis curve upon comparison with the untreated control group of worms (Tejeda-Benitez and Olivero-Verbel 2016). Subsequently, emphasizing on the relevance of oxidative stress in regulating important signaling pathways and worm’s biochemistry, different sensitive and effective methods are available for measuring different parameters like pro-oxidants, oxidized biomolecules, and its resistance. The effects of nanoparticles on the nervous system of the worms can also be monitored by different assays with the availability of specific neuron types tagged with GFP. Green fluorescent protein analysis protocols can directly or indirectly allow for the quantification, localization, and specific activity measurements of a particular neuron and/or set of neurons upon nanoparticle treatment. C. elegans also provide an ideal platform for whole-organism pathway and network analysis, genetic screening, and analysis through single and double mutant strains available. Recently, transcriptomics and metabolomics approaches have also been reported in C. elegans (Kim et al. 2017a). The details of these different assays are described in Table. 8.1 and Fig. 8.7.
To examine nanoparticle uptake and bio-distribution, the most commonly used techniques are fluorescent microscopy and hyperspectral dark-field microscopy. Additionally, transmission electron microscopy (TEM), synchrotron-based techniques, and other analytical techniques were also employed (Table 8.2). Recently, the levels of metal exposed on C. elegans and their uptake and bio-distribution can also be quantified using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). The presence of nanoparticles can also be visualized directly in various organ systems of C. elegans. For example, TEM and optical microscopy can detect the presence of nanoparticles in the alimentary and reproductive systems. Scanning electron microscopy with energy-dispersive X-ray analysis (SEM-EDX) is often used for the visualization of nanoparticles in the cuticular system (Moragas 2016) (Table 8.2) (Fig. 8.7).
Modern imaging techniques like magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and synchrotron radiation X-ray fluorescence (μ-SRXRF) can be used to identify, locate, and characterize individual nanoparticle in the specific area of worm’s body. X-ray spectroscopy and synchrotron X-ray absorption near-edge spectroscopy (μ-XANES) are used in confirmation of the bio-distribution and status of the nanoparticles along the body of the worm (Moragas 2016). Quantification of the nano-bio interactions between monodispersed small and large coated or non-coated nanoparticles in C. elegans using two-photon luminescence microscopy (TPLM) has also been reported. Other commonly applied techniques to study nano-bio interactions include hyperspectral dark-field microscopy (Meyer et al. 2010; Ahn et al. 2014), fluorescent microscopy (Pluskota et al. 2009), synchrotron-based techniques, transmission electron microscopy (TEM) (Kim et al. 2012), and other chemical techniques (Table 8.2) (Fig. 8.7).
8.7 Work Flow to Study Nano-Bio Interaction of Nanoparticles in C. elegans
8.8 Examples of Common Biological Activities of Nanoparticles Elucidated Using C. elegans
8.8.1 Nanoparticles in Drug Delivery, Control Release, and Targeting
Delivery systems have been used to enhance the effectiveness of drugs and to decrease the dosage required. Polymeric nanoparticles were often used as particle carriers in various fields because of their subcellular size and sustained release properties that are compatible with tissues and cells. This has led to the applications of nanoparticles as promising vehicles for drug delivery for various diseases with site specificity in the host system. Nanoparticles provide significant advantages over traditional drug delivery in terms of specificity, stability, drug-carrying capacity, and sustained release. Their ability to deliver both hydrophilic and hydrophobic drug molecules is also feasible for use in various routes of administrations.
Recently, a comparative study on the efficacy of cinnamaldehyde (CNMA) as broad-spectrum antimicrobial agents was tested via its conjugation to the surface of Au nanoparticles (CNMA-GNPs). Different parameters were evaluated which include delivery, compatibility, biofilm formation, and C. elegans survival rate. Interestingly, results showed that this antimicrobial nanodrug delivery system (CNMA-GNPs) successfully reduced pathogenic biofilms and antibiotic-resistant strains and significantly ameliorates pathogenic infections. Similarly, it reduced the C. elegans mortality rate, whereby a twofold increase in worm survivability was reported on S. aureus infection (Ramasamy et al. 2017). A similar study reported that pre-treatment of irradiated C. elegans with resveratrol-loaded nanoparticles (RESNPs) enhances the overall life span of the worms by reducing its injury from γ-ray radiation and toxicity from amyloid-peptide overexpression. Additionally, there were enhanced radical scavenging and enhanced expression of SOD-3 observed in the worms that confirmed the successful development of antioxidant nanoparticles (Yin et al. 2014). The significance of peptide multifunctionalized gold nanorods in reducing the toxicity of β-amyloid peptide in the C. elegans model of Alzheimer’s disease has also been reported (Morales-Zavala et al. 2017).
In another interesting study that highlighted the significance of this model as an effective delivery system is in the form of nanoemulsion-based delivery systems. The incorporation of linoleic acid with conjugation (CLA) or hydrophobic molecules into nanoemulsion based-delivery systems was monitored using the body fat parameter of worms. Overall, their findings have shown that there were significant reductions in whole-body fat of the worms that are exposed to nanoemulsions containing CLA in comparison to the worms that were exposed to linoleic acid only. Thus, it provides a clue that this model is more appropriate in understanding methods or applications of food or drug that are lipophilic in nature (Colmenares et al. 2016). In another development that demonstrated the importance of an in vivo controlled and constant release of molecules in C. elegans, the application and design of laser-sensitive Ag nanoparticles from functionalized novel hydrogel shells were also reported using this model system. Thus, consistency in releasing was obtained on radiation with near-infrared light (Lengert et al. 2017).
8.8.2 Nanoparticles in Molecular Imaging/Bioprobes/Diagnostics
Transparent body and small size of C. elegans are ideal for in vivo optical microscopy. Kim et al. (2013) have reported on a simple immobilization technique that can protect the worms from different toxicants’ exposure, besides aiding in its recovery for long-term imaging using nanoparticle-mediated immobilization (Kim et al. 2013). Recently, a new diagnostic method has also been developed for the accurate measurement of intracellular pH (pHi) using C. elegans. This is based on the pH-sensitive Si nanoparticles that can be monitored and visualized by the application of confocal microscopy. The fluorescence intensity patterns that are generated can be used for the quantitative ratio metric analysis of pHi and the overall functions of the organism’s metabolic rate. The translational implication is that this economically feasible technique that was formulated in C. elegans can have huge applications in the higher model organism for understanding the normal metabolism and its related diseases (Mathew et al. 2014).
In another study that highlighted the significance of C. elegans in understanding nanoparticles, bioactivity is in the intercellular transport of lipoproteins whereby fluorescent nanodiamonds were utilized to serve as a marker for observation (Chang et al. 2008). Similarly, Arnhold et al. (2015) have reported that by enhancing Si nanoparticles through fluorescently tagged functionalization, it can be utilized as high-end probes. This has been employed to capture specific images of live worms under an active physiological state. Perturbations of the different cellular components of C. elegans can also be monitored in a real-time manner for different useful applications. The feasibility of C. elegans as an in vivo model in monitoring the progression of amyloid toxicity through enhanced fibrillation images and its accurate quantification has also been reported (Arnhold et al. 2015). A simple, sensitive, and highly specific lipid targeting Raman probe (Nile red-coated silver nanoparticles) has also been developed to image live C. elegans (Charan et al. 2011). This can have wider applications to a higher mammalian system and in understanding lipid droplets, dyslipidemia, or diseases related to lipid metabolism.
8.8.3 Nanoparticles as Antioxidants
The central idea of the oxidative damage (or oxidative stress) theory is that “accumulation of molecular damage caused by reactive oxygen species (ROS) which contributes significantly to aging, i.e., to the functional decline and increase in mortality that happens later in life” (Harman 1956; Beckman and Ames, 1998). Recent studies on the biological importance of metal nanoparticles have increased in the field of nano-biotechnology. Kim et al. (2008) investigated whether platinum (Pt) nanoparticles can influence the gathering of the autofluorescent lipofuscin pigment. Lipofuscin is the product of enhanced oxidative damage to cellular components. Its accumulation is most commonly observed in the intestinal cells, and this can serve as a marker for deterioration of overall physiological state with age (Brunk and Terman 2002; Garigan et al. 2002) (Table 8.3).
A study on the biological activity of Pt nanoparticle has shown that it can act as a mimetic of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase in C. elegans. Comparative effects of Pt nanoparticle and EUK-8, a synthetic, low-molecular-weight salen-manganese complex, were also studied based on the life span of wild-type N2 worms and the short-lived mev-1(kn1) mutant (Kim et al. 2008). The Pt nanoparticles were more efficient than EUK-8 in prolonging the life span of C. elegans (Kim et al. 2008) suggesting that Pt nanoparticles can have a positive effect by reducing enhanced levels of ROS that is mostly seen in diseased conditions. However, it is important to know and monitor the dosage of nanoparticles used because the excess amounts can have harmful effects (Kim et al. 2008).
8.8.4 Nanoparticles as Antimicrobial/Anti-Virulence Activity
The basic principle in assaying and underpinning the use of C. elegans in anti-infective/antimicrobial drug discovery is that some pathogens that cause infections in humans infect C. elegans too. Indeed, it is estimated that more than 40 human pathogenic strains reported so far can infect C. elegans (Sifri et al. 2005). C. elegans has become an excellent model for studying the antimicrobial effect of nanoparticles. For example, Au, Ag, and Pt nanoparticles have been extensively used as antimicrobial, antiviral, and anti-inflammatory agents (Hu et al. 2006; Jain et al. 2008). Ramasamy and his colleagues (2017) have shown the antimicrobial effect of Au nanoparticles in the C. elegans, where they have conjugated the cinnamaldehyde with Au nanoparticles, which eradicated the biofilm formation of Gram-positive bacteria and Gram-negative bacteria. Besides, these Au nanoparticles attenuate various virulence factors of S. aureus and protected C. elegans from infection (Ramasamy et al. 2017). Silver nanoparticles have also been reported to have both bactericidal and bacteriostatic properties (Hunt et al. 2013) (Table 8.3).
8.8.5 Nanoparticles’ Roles in the Regulation of Metabolism
Feasibility of the worms allows them to be an ideal model for studying energy metabolism, wherein starvation and excess energy can affect the overall physiology of the worms. Recent reports suggest that exposure of worms to nanopolystyrene particles can change various metabolites related to energy metabolisms, such as tricarboxylic acid cycle intermediates, glucose, and lactic acid. Similarly, studies have shown that upon exposure, it reduces the levels of important amino acids that can serve as metabolites for energy metabolism such as glutamic acid, isoleucine, valine, and lysine (Kim et al. 2018; De Lorenzo et al. 2002).
8.8.6 Nanoparticles in Aging and Developmental Studies
During the reproductive cycle, the worm’s vulva is the major organ involved in progeny production. The lacking of normal vulva and bag-of-worm (BOW) phenotypes with egg-laying deficiency was seen in reproductive-age worms when treated with plain or labeled Si nanoparticles. BOW phenotype is characterized by fertilized embryos that come from their shells within the body of hermaphrodite and feeds on the body of their parent worm itself. Further, they ruled out the post-larval stage applications and organ-specific interactions of nanoparticles that affect the reproductive organs. These findings prove that Si nanoparticles can mediate the degeneration of neural and reproductive systems concerning their age (Scharf et al. 2013; Pluskota et al. 2009).
The various effects of nanoparticles on the growth and development of the worms were also linked to defective food intake. Arnold et al. (2013) have seen a decline in C. elegans growth on CeO2 nanoparticle treatment due to a reduced dietary intake mediated by the interactions between CeO2 and E. coli (Arnold et al. 2013). CeO2 has a greater affinity to bind to E. coli (Thill et al. 2006). The decrease in growth and development of the worms may be due to the treatment with CeO2 nanoparticles. Also, the developmental delay of C. elegans is a common physiological response to stress and has been observed after exposure to copper sulfate (CuSO4), TiO2, and ZnO nanoparticles (Wu et al. 2013).
The effect of SiO2 nanoparticles on enhancing the aging of cells at the molecular and organism level was also reported (Scharf et al. 2013). Treated animals exhibit enhanced accumulation of ubiquitinated proteins when compared to controls, which resembles the accumulation of endogenous insoluble proteins in older worms. Additionally, fine structures in the intestinal cell nuclei (amyloid-like) were observed in SiO2 nanoparticle-treated worms. Also, SiO2 nanoparticle is reported to have a direct influence with pharyngeal use in worms by premature induction of an age-related reduction in pharyngeal motor activity through pharyngeal pumping (Scharf et al. 2013).
8.8.7 Nanotoxicity Assessment
C. elegans has become a favorable model organism for toxicity assessment. Nanoparticles can have surprisingly both beneficial and toxic effects on macromolecules of cells. Nanoparticle-mediated toxicity in C. elegans can be assessed using different standard methods and protocols. For example, assays that determine the worm’s growth, mortality rate, reproductive capability, and locomotive changes can provide accurate measurements and predictability when applied to higher mammalian systems. In comparison to different in vitro assays, toxicity assays in C. elegans are reproducible. Scientific data can be generated easily from the different lethal and sublethal endpoints of an intact and metabolically active animal with different tissues and organ systems (Boyd et al. 2010; Corsi et al. 2015) (Fig. 8.8).
8.9 Conclusion
Underrating the importance of nanoparticles in research for the usage of mankind has steadily increased the scope of nanotechnology. To serve this purpose, the synthesis and formulations of various nanomaterials should focus on the elimination of as much of the toxic effects on the biological systems. Thus, a feasible and proper in vivo model system such as C. elegans represents an ideal platform for fast and reproducible results for the elucidation of nanoparticles biological effects. At the same time, in learning the effects of nanoparticles, it is necessary to examine their interactions since accurate outcome depends on various factors such as media, exposure, physicochemical properties, growth conditions, etc. Different mechanistic studies of nanoparticles for uptake, bio-distribution, and excretion were simplified with the availability of different high-end and sensitive techniques. Biochemical assays and genetic and molecular analyses such as RNAi, qPCR, and microarrays have also enriched our understanding of the whole process of nanoparticle biological activities using C. elegans. Lastly, realizing the significant contributions of C. elegans in the elucidation of various biological activities of nanoparticles, their safety designs and development can be further improved for various translational applications and human therapeutic values.
References
Ahn J-M, Eom H-J, Yang X, Meyer JN, Choi J (2014) Comparative toxicity of silver nanoparticles on oxidative stress and DNA damage in the nematode, Caenorhabditis elegans. Chemosphere 108:343–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.01.078
Altun ZF, Chen B, Wang Z-W, Hall DH (2009) High resolution map of Caenorhabditis elegans gap junction proteins. Dev Dyn 238:1936–1950. https://doi.org/10.1002/dvdy.22025
Arnhold F, Scharf A, von Mikecz A (2015) Imaging and quantification of amyloid fibrillation in the cell nucleus. Methods Mol Biol 1228:187–202
Arnold MC, Badireddy AR, Wiesner MR, Di Giulio RT, Meyer JN (2013) Cerium oxide nanoparticles are more toxic than equimolar bulk cerium oxide in caenorhabditis elegans. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 65:224–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-013-9905-5
Beckman KB, Ames BN (1998) The free radical theory of aging matures. Physiol Rev 78:547–581. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.1998.78.2.547
Bird AF, Bird J (1991) The structure of nematodes. Elsevier Science, New York
Bird DM, Opperman CH, Jones SJ, Baillie DL (1999) The caenorhabditis elegans g enome : a guide in the post genomics age. Annu Rev Phytopathol 37:247–265. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.phyto.37.1.247
de Bono M, Villu Maricq A (2005) Neuronal substrates of complex behaviors in c. elegans. Annu Rev Neurosci 28:451–501. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144259
Bossinger O, Hoffm M (2012) Development and cell polarity of the C. elegans intestine. In: Current frontiers and perspectives in cell biology. InTech, Rijeka
Boyd WA, McBride SJ, Rice JR, Snyder DW, Freedman JH (2010) A high-throughput method for assessing chemical toxicity using a Caenorhabditis elegans reproduction assay. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 245:153–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.taap.2010.02.014
Brenner S (1974) The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 77:71–94
Brinke M, Heininger P, Traunspurger W (2011) A semi-fluid gellan gum medium improves nematode toxicity testing. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 74:1824–1831. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECOENV.2011.07.007
Brunk UT, Terman A (2002) Lipofuscin: mechanisms of age-related accumulation and influence on cell function. Free Radic Biol Med 33:611–619
Cha YJ, Lee J, Choi SS (2012) Apoptosis-mediated in vivo toxicity of hydroxylated fullerene nanoparticles in soil nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Chemosphere 87:49–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.11.054
Chang Y-R, Lee H-Y, Chen K, Chang C-C, Tsai D-S, C-c F, Lim T-S, Tzeng Y-K, Fang C-Y, Han C-C, Chang H-C, Fann WS (2008) Mass production and dynamic imaging of fluorescent nanodiamonds. Nat Nanotechnol 3:284–288. https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2008.99
Charan S, Chien F-C, Singh N, Kuo CW, Chen P (2011) Development of lipid targeting raman probes for in vivo imaging of caenorhabditis elegans. Chem Eur J 17:5165–5170. https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.201002896
Chatterjee N, Eom H-J, Choi J (2014) A systems toxicology approach to the surface functionality control of graphene–cell interactions. Biomaterials 35:1109–1127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.09.108
Chatterjee N, Kim Y, Yang J, Roca CP, Joo SW, Choi J (2017) A systems toxicology approach reveals the Wnt-MAPK crosstalk pathway mediated reproductive failure in Caenorhabditis elegans exposed to graphene oxide (GO) but not to reduced graphene oxide (rGO). Nanotoxicology 11:76–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/17435390.2016.1267273
Chisholm AD, Xu S (2012) The Caenorhabditis elegans epidermis as a model skin. II: differentiation and physiological roles. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Dev Biol 1:879–902. https://doi.org/10.1002/wdev.77
Collin B, Oostveen E, Tsyusko OV, Unrine JM (2014) Influence of natural organic matter and surface charge on the toxicity and bioaccumulation of functionalized ceria nanoparticles in caenorhabditis elegans. Environ Sci Technol 48:1280–1289. https://doi.org/10.1021/es404503c
Collin B, Tsyusko OV, Starnes DL, Unrine JM (2016) Effect of natural organic matter on dissolution and toxicity of sulfidized silver nanoparticles to Caenorhabditis elegans. Environ Sci Nano 3:728–736. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6EN00095A
Colmenares JC, Xu Y-J (2016) Heterogeneous photocatalysis : from fundamentals to green applications. Springer, Berlin
Contag PR (2002) Whole-animal cellular and molecular imaging to accelerate drug development. Drug Discov Today 7:555–562. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6446(02)02268-7
Contreras EQ, Puppala HL, Escalera G, Zhong W, Colvin VL (2014) Size-dependent impacts of silver nanoparticles on the lifespan, fertility, growth, and locomotion of Caenorhabditis elegans. Environ Toxicol Chem 33:2716–2723. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.2705
Corsi AK (2006) A biochemist’s guide to Caenorhabditis elegans. Anal Biochem 359:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ab.2006.07.033
Corsi AK, Wightman B, Chalfie M (2015) A transparent window into biology: a primer on Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 200:387–407
de Pomerai D, Madhamshettiwar P, Anbalagan C et al (2009) The stress-response network in animals: proposals to develop a predictive mathematical model. Open Toxicol J 2:71–76
Dupuy D, Li Q-R, Deplancke B, Boxem M, Hao T, Lamesch P, Sequerra R, Bosak S, Doucette-Stamm L, Hope IA, Hill DE, Walhout AJ, Vidal M (2004) A first version of the caenorhabditis elegans promoterome. Genome Res 14:2169–2175. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.2497604
Durbin RM (1987) Studies on the development and organisation of the nervous system of Caenorhabditis elegans. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Cambridge)
Ellegaard-Jensen L, Jensen KA, Johansen A (2012) Nano-silver induces dose-response effects on the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 80:216–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2012.03.003
Ellis SR, Morales MJ, Li JM, Hopper AK, Martin NC (1986) Isolation and characterization of the TRM1 locus, a gene essential for the N2,N2-dimethylguanosine modification of both mitochondrial and cytoplasmic tRNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem 261:9703–9709
Elmore S (2007) Apoptosis: a review of programmed cell death. Toxicol Pathol 35:495–516. https://doi.org/10.1080/01926230701320337
Emmons SW (2005) Male development. WormBook. https://doi.org/10.1895/wormbook.1.33.1
Emmons SW, Lipton J (2003) Genetic basis of male sexual behavior. J Neurobiol 54:93–110. https://doi.org/10.1002/neu.10163
Fang-Yen C, Avery L, Samuel ADT (2009) Two size-selective mechanisms specifically trap bacteria-sized food particles in Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:20093–20096. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0904036106
Fire A, Xu S, Montgomery MK, Kostas SA, Driver SE, Mello CC (1998) Potent and specific genetic interference by double-stranded RNA in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 391:806–811. https://doi.org/10.1038/35888
Gao Y, Liu N, Chen C, Luo Y, Li Y, Zhang Z, Zhao Y, Zhao B, Iida A, Chai Z-F (2008) Mapping technique for biodistribution of elements in a model organism, Caenorhabditis elegans, after exposure to copper nanoparticles with microbeam synchrotron radiation X-ray fluorescence. J Anal At Spectrom 23:1121–1124. https://doi.org/10.1039/b802338g
García-Sancho M (2012) From the genetic to the computer program: the historicity of ‘data’ and ‘computation’ in the investigations on the nematode worm C. elegans (1963–1998). Stud Hist Phil Biol Biomed Sci 43:16–28
Garigan D, Hsu A-L, Fraser AG, Kamath RS, Ahringer J, Kenyon C (2002) Genetic analysis of tissue aging in Caenorhabditis elegans: a role for heat-shock factor and bacterial proliferation. Genetics 161:1101–1112
Golden TR, Beckman KB, Lee AHJ, Dudek N, Hubbard A, Samper E, Melov S (2007) Dramatic age-related changes in nuclear and genome copy number in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Aging Cell 6:179–188
Gonzalez-Moragas L, Maurer LL, Harms VM, Meyer JN, Laromaine A, Roig A (2017) Materials and toxicological approaches to study metal and metal-oxide nanoparticles in the model organism Caenorhabditis elegans. Mater Horiz 4:719–746. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7MH00166E
Gonzalez-Moragas L, Yu S-M, Carenza E, Laromaine A, Roig A (2015) Protective effects of bovine serum albumin on superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles evaluated in the nematode caenorhabditis elegans. ACS Biomater Sci Eng 1:1129–1138. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.5b00253
Handy RD, Cornelis G, Fernandes T, Tsyusko O, Decho A, Sabo-Attwood T, Metcalfe C, Steevens JA, Klaine SJ, Koelmans AA, Horne N (2012) Ecotoxicity test methods for engineered nanomaterials: practical experiences and recommendations from the bench. Environ Toxicol Chem 31:15–31. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.706
Harman D (1956) Aging: a theory based on free radical and radiation chemistry. J Gerontol 11:298–300. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronj/11.3.298
Herndon L, Schmeissner P (2002) Stochastic and genetic factors influence tissue-specific decline in ageing C. elegans. Nature 419(6909):808–814
Hodgkin J (2005) Introduction to genetics and genomics. WormBook. https://doi.org/10.1895/wormbook.1.17.1
Hofmann ER, Milstein S, Boulton SJ, Ye M, Hofmann JJ, Stergiou L, Gartner A, Vidal M, Hengartner MO (2002) Caenorhabditis elegans HUS-1 is a DNA damage checkpoint protein required for genome stability and EGL-1-mediated apoptosis. Curr Biol 12:1908–1918
Horvitz HR, Sulston JE (1980) Isolation and genetic characterization of cell-lineage mutants of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 96:435–454
Hu C-C, Wu G-H, Lai S-F, Shanmugam MM, Hwu Y, Wagner OI, Yen T-J (2018) Toxic effects of size-tunable gold nanoparticles on Caenorhabditis elegans development and gene regulation. Sci Rep 8:15245. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-33585-7
Hulme SE, Whitesides GM (2011) Chemistry and the worm: caenorhabditis elegans as a platform for integrating chemical and biological research. Angew Chem Int Ed 50:4774–4807. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201005461
Hunt PR (2017) The C. elegans model in toxicity testing. J Appl Toxicol 37:50–59. https://doi.org/10.1002/jat.3357
Iannarelli L, Giovannozzi AM, Morelli F, Viscotti F, Bigini P, Maurino V, Spoto G, Martra G, Ortel E, Hodoroaba VD, Rossi AM, Diomede L (2016) Shape engineered TiO 2 nanoparticles in Caenorhabditis elegans: a Raman imaging based approach to assist tissue-specific toxicological studies. RSC Adv 6:70501–70509. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA09686G
Jadhav KB, Rajini PS (2009) Neurophysiological alterations in Caenorhabditis elegans exposed to dichlorvos, an organophosphorus insecticide. Pestic Biochem Physiol 94:79–85
Jeong P-Y, Jung M, Yim Y-H, Kim H, Park M, Hong E, Lee W, Kim YH, Kim K, Paik YK (2005) Chemical structure and biological activity of the Caenorhabditis elegans dauer-inducing pheromone. Nature 433:541–545. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03201
Jones D, Candido EP (1999) Feeding is inhibited by sublethal concentrations of toxicants and by heat stress in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans: relationship to the cellular stress response. J Exp Zool 284:147–157
Kaletta T, Hengartner MO (2006) Finding function in novel targets: C. elegans as a model organism. Nat Rev Drug Discov 5:387–399. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd2031
Kamath RS, Ahringer J (2003) Genome-wide RNAi screening in Caenorhabditis elegans. Methods 30:313–321
Kenyon C, Chang J, Gensch E, Rudner A, Tabtiang R (1993) A C. elegans mutant that lives twice as long as wild type. Nature 366:461–464. https://doi.org/10.1038/366461a0
Kerr R (2006) Imaging the activity of neurons and muscles. WormBook. https://doi.org/10.1895/wormbook.1.113.1
Kim E, Sun L, Gabel CV, Fang-Yen C (2013) Long-term imaging of caenorhabditis elegans using nanoparticle-mediated immobilization. PLoS One 8:e53419. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053419
Kim J, Shirasawa T, Miyamoto Y (2010) The effect of TAT conjugated platinum nanoparticles on lifespan in a nematode Caenorhabditis elegans model. Biomaterials 31:5849–5854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.03.077
Kim J, Takahashi M, Shimizu T, Shirasawa T, Kajita M, Kanayama A, Miyamoto Y (2008) Effects of a potent antioxidant, platinum nanoparticle, on the lifespan of Caenorhabditis elegans. Mech Ageing Dev 129:322–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mad.2008.02.011
Kim SW, Nam S-H, An Y-J (2012) Interaction of silver nanoparticles with biological surfaces of Caenorhabditis elegans. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 77:64–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2011.10.023
Kim Y, Jeong J, Yang J, Joo SW, Hong J, Choi J (2018) Graphene oxide nano-bio interaction induces inhibition of spermatogenesis and disturbance of fatty acid metabolism in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Toxicology 410:83–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TOX.2018.09.006
Klass MR (1977) Aging in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans: major biological and environmental factors influencing life span. Mech Ageing Dev 6:413–429
L’Hernault SW (1997) Spermatogenesis. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor NewYork
Lamitina T, Huang CG, Strange K (2006) Genome-wide RNAi screening identifies protein damage as a regulator of osmoprotective gene expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci 103:12173–12178. https://doi.org/10.1073/PNAS.0602987103
Le Trequesser Q, Saez G, Devès G, Devès G, Michelet C, Barberet P, Delville M-H, Seznec H (2014) In situ titanium dioxide nanoparticles quantitative microscopy in cells and in C. elegans using nuclear microprobe analysis. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res Sect B Beam Interact with Mater Atoms 341:58–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2014.06.031
Lehner B, Tischler J, Fraser AG (2006) RNAi screens in Caenorhabditis elegans in a 96-well liquid format and their application to the systematic identification of genetic interactions. Nat Protoc 1:1617–1620. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2006.245
Lengert E, Saveleva M, Abalymov A, Atkin V, Wuytens PC, Kamyshinsky R, Vasiliev AL, Gorin DA, Sukhorukov GB, Skirtach AG, Parakhonskiy B (2017) Silver alginate hydrogel micro- and nanocontainers for theranostics: synthesis, encapsulation, remote release, and detection. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9:21949–21958. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b08147
Li Y, Yu S, Wu Q, Tang M, Pu Y, Wang D (2012) Chronic Al 2 O 3-nanoparticle exposure causes neurotoxic effects on locomotion behaviors by inducing severe ROS production and disruption of ROS defense mechanisms in nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. J Hazard Mater 219:221–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.03.083
Lim D, Roh J, Eom H, Choi JY, Hyun J, Choi J (2012) Oxidative stress-related PMK-1 P38 MAPK activation as a mechanism for toxicity of silver nanoparticles to reproduction in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Environ Toxicol Chem 31:585–592. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.1706
Luo X, Xu S, Yang Y, Li L, Chen S, Xu AL, Wu L (2016) Insights into the ecotoxicity of silver nanoparticles transferred from escherichia coli to caenorhabditis elegans. Sci Rep 6:36465. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep36465
Ma H, Bertsch PM, Glenn TC, Kabengi NJ, Williams PL (2009) Toxicity of manufactured zinc oxide nanoparticles in the nematode caenorhabditis elegans. Environ Toxicol Chem 28:1324–1330. https://doi.org/10.1897/08-262.1
Marsh EK, May RC (2012) Caenorhabditis elegans, a model organism for investigating immunity. Appl Environ Microbiol 78:2075–2081. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.07486-11
Mashock MJ, Zanon T, Kappell AD, Petrella LN, Andersen EC, Hristova KR (2016) Copper oxide nanoparticles impact several toxicological endpoints and cause neurodegeneration in caenorhabditis elegans. PLoS One 11:e0167613. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0167613
Mathew ND, Mathew MD, Surawski PPT (2014) Nanoparticle imaging and diagnostic of Caenorhabditis elegans intracellular pH. Anal Biochem 450:52–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ab.2014.01.011
Matsuura T, Miura H, Nishino A (2013) Inhibition of gustatory plasticity due to acute nicotine exposure in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Neurosci Res 77:155–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neures.2013.09.001
Maurer LL, Ryde IT, Yang X, Meyer JN (2015) Caenorhabditis elegans as a model for toxic effects of nanoparticles: lethality, growth, and reproduction. Curr Protoc Toxicol 66:20.10.1–20.10.25. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471140856.tx2010s66
Maurer LL, Yang X, Schindler AJ, Taggart RK, Jiang C, Hsu-Kim H, Sherwood DR, Meyer JN (2016) Intracellular trafficking pathways in silver nanoparticle uptake and toxicity in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nanotoxicology 10:831–835. https://doi.org/10.3109/17435390.2015.1110759
Meyer JN, Lord CA, Yang XY, Turner EA, Badireddy AR, Marinakos SM, Chilkoti A, Wiesner MR, Auffan M (2010) Intracellular uptake and associated toxicity of silver nanoparticles in Caenorhabditis elegans. Aquat Toxicol 100:140–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2010.07.016
Mohan N, Chen C-S, Hsieh H-H, Wu YC, Chang HC (2010) In Vivo imaging and toxicity assessments of fluorescent nanodiamonds in caenorhabditis elegans. Nano Lett 10:3692–3699. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl1021909
Moragas LG (2016) Evaluating inorganic nanoparticles in the living organism Caenorhabditis elegans. (Doctoral dissertation, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona)
Morales-Zavala F, Arriagada H, Hassan N, Velasco C, Riveros A, Álvarez AR, Minniti AN, Rojas-Silva X, Muñoz LL, Vasquez R, Rodriguez K, Sanchez-Navarro M, Giralt E, Araya E, Aldunate R, Kogan MJ (2017) Peptide multifunctionalized gold nanorods decrease toxicity of β-amyloid peptide in a Caenorhabditis elegans model of Alzheimer’s disease. Nanomedicine 13:2341–2350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nano.2017.06.013
Nelson FK, Albert PS, Riddle DL (1983) Fine structure of the Caenorhabditis elegans secretory-excretory system. J Ultrastruct Res 82:156–171
Nouara A, Wu Q, Li Y, Wang H, Zhao Y, Wang D (2013) Carboxylic acid functionalization prevents the translocation of multi-walled carbon nanotubes at predicted environmentally relevant concentrations into targeted organs of nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Nanoscale 5:6088–6096. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3nr00847a
O’Rourke EJ, Soukas AA, Carr CE, Ruvkun G (2009) C. elegans major fats are stored in vesicles distinct from lysosome-related organelles. Cell Metab 10:430–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2009.10.002
Pluskota A, Horzowski E, Bossinger O, von Mikecz A (2009) In Caenorhabditis elegans nanoparticle-bio-interactions become transparent: silica-nanoparticles induce reproductive senescence. PLoS One 4:e6622. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0006622
Polak N, Read DS, Jurkschat K, Matzke M, Kelly FJ, Spurgeon DJ, Stürzenbaum SR (2014) Metalloproteins and phytochelatin synthase may confer protection against zinc oxide nanoparticle induced toxicity in Caenorhabditis elegans. Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol 160:75–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpc.2013.12.001
Pomper M, Lee J (2005) Small animal imaging in drug development. Curr Pharm Des 11:3247–3272. https://doi.org/10.2174/138161205774424681
Qu M, Xu K, Li Y, Wong G, Wang D (2018) Using acs-22 mutant Caenorhabditis elegans to detect the toxicity of nanopolystyrene particles. Sci Total Environ 643:119–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.173
Ramasamy M, Lee J-H, Lee J (2017) Development of gold nanoparticles coated with silica containing the antibiofilm drug cinnamaldehyde and their effects on pathogenic bacteria. Int J Nanomedicine 12:2813–2828. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S132784
Roh J-Y, Choi J (2011) Cyp35a2 gene expression is involved in toxicity of fenitrothion in the soil nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Chemosphere 84:1356–1361
Roh J, Park Y, Park K, Choi J (2010) Ecotoxicological investigation of CeO(2) and TiO(2) nanoparticles on the soil nematode Caenorhabditis elegans using gene expression, growth, fertility, and survival as endpoints. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol 29:167–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ETAP.2009.12.003
Roh J, Sim SJ, Yi J, Park K, Chung KH, Ryu DY, Choi J (2009) Ecotoxicity of silver nanoparticles on the soil nematode caenorhabditis elegans using functional ecotoxicogenomics. Environ Sci Technol 43:3933–3940. https://doi.org/10.1021/es803477u
Rual J-F (2004) Toward improving caenorhabditis elegans phenome mapping with an orfeome-based RNAi library. Genome Res 14:2162–2168. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.2505604
Rudel D, Douglas CD, Huffnagle IM, Besser JM, Ingersoll CG (2013) Assaying environmental nickel toxicity using model nematodes. PLoS One 8:e77079. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0077079
Sabella S, Carney RP, Brunetti V, Malvindi MA, Al-Juffali N, Vecchio G, Janes SM, Bakr OM, Cingolani R, Stellacci F, Pompa PP (2014) A general mechanism for intracellular toxicity of metal-containing nanoparticles. Nanoscale 6:7052–7061. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4nr01234h
San-Miguel A, Lu H (2013) Microfluidics as a tool for C. elegans research. WormBook:1–19. https://doi.org/10.1895/wormbook.1.162.1
Schafer W (2005) Egg-laying. WormBook. https://doi.org/10.1895/wormbook.1.38.1
Scharf A, Gührs K-H, von Mikecz A (2016) Anti-amyloid compounds protect from silica nanoparticle-induced neurotoxicity in the nematode C. elegans. Nanotoxicology 10:426–435. https://doi.org/10.3109/17435390.2015.1073399
Scharf A, Piechulek A, von Mikecz A (2013) Effect of nanoparticles on the biochemical and behavioral aging phenotype of the nematode caenorhabditis elegans. ACS Nano 7:10695–10703. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn403443r
Schedl T (1997) Developmental genetics of the germ line. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor New York
Sifri CD, Begun J, Ausubel FM (2005) The worm has turned—microbial virulence modeled in Caenorhabditis elegans. Trends Microbiol 13:119–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2005.01.003
Singh V, Aballay A (2006) Heat-shock transcription factor (HSF)-1 pathway required for Caenorhabditis elegans immunity. Proc Natl Acad Sci 103:13092–13097. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0604050103
Singson A (2001) Every sperm is sacred: fertilization in Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev Biol 230:101–109. https://doi.org/10.1006/DBIO.2000.0118
Song B, Avery L (2013) The pharynx of the nematode C. elegans. Worm 2:e21833. https://doi.org/10.4161/worm.21833
Starnes DL, Unrine JM, Starnes CP, Collin BE, Oostveen EK, Ma R, Lowry GV, Bertsch PM, Tsyusko OV (2015) Impact of sulfidation on the bioavailability and toxicity of silver nanoparticles to Caenorhabditis elegans. Environ Pollut 196:239–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2014.10.009
Sternberg PW (2005) Last revised. WormBook. https://doi.org/10.1895/wormbook.1.6.1
Stiernagle T (2006) Maintenance of C elegans. WormBook:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1895/wormbook.1.101.1
Sulston JE, Albertson DG, Thomson JN (1980) The Caenorhabditis elegans male: postembryonic development of nongonadal structures. Dev Biol 78:542–576. https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-1606(80)90352-8
Sulston JE, Horvitz HR (1977) Post-embryonic cell lineages of the nematode, Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev Biol 56:110–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-1606(77)90158-0
Sulston JE, Schierenberg E, White JG, Thomson JN (1983) The embryonic cell lineage of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev Biol 100:64–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-1606(83)90201-4
Tejeda-Benitez L, Olivero-Verbel J (2016) Caenorhabditis elegans, a biological model for research in toxicology. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol 237:1–35
Thill A, Zeyons O, Spalla O, Chauvat F, Rose J, Auffan M, Flank AM (2006) Cytotoxicity of CeO2 nanoparticles for escherichia coli. Physico-chemical insight of the cytotoxicity mechanism. Environ Sci Technol 40:6151–6156. https://doi.org/10.1021/es060999b
Timmons L, Fire A (1998) Specific interference by ingested dsRNA. Nature 395:854–854. https://doi.org/10.1038/27579
Tsyusko O, Unrine J, Spurgeon D, Blalock E, Starnes D, Tseng M, Joice G, Bertsch PM (2012) Toxicogenomic responses of the model organism Caenorhabditis elegans to gold nanoparticles. Environ Sci Technol 46:4115–4124. https://doi.org/10.1021/ES2033108
Van Voorhies WA, Ward S (1999) Genetic and environmental conditions that increase longevity in Caenorhabditis elegans decrease metabolic rate. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96:11399–11403. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.20.11399
Walhout A (2006) Biochemistry and molecular biology. WormBook. https://doi.org/10.1895/wormbook.1.86.1
Wang D, Xing X (2009) Pre-treatment with mild metal exposure suppresses the neurotoxicity on locomotion behavior induced by the subsequent severe metal exposure in Caenorhabditis elegans. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol 28:459–464
Wang H, Wick RL, Xing B (2009) Toxicity of nanoparticulate and bulk ZnO, Al2O3 and TiO2 to the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Environ Pollut 157:1171–1177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2008.11.004
Wang Q, Zhou Y, Song B, Zhong Y, Wu S, Cui R, Cong H, Su Y, Zhang H, He Y (2016) Quantum dots: linking subcellular disturbance to physiological behavior and toxicity induced by quantum dots in caenorhabditis elegans (small 23/2016). Small 12:3073–3073. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201670112
Wang Y, Ezemaduka AN (2014) Combined effect of temperature and zinc on Caenorhabditis elegans wild type and daf-21 mutant strains. J Therm Biol 41:16–20
Ward S, Thomson N, White JG, Brenner S (1975) Electron microscopical reconstruction of the anterior sensory anatomy of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. J Comp Neurol 160:313–337. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.901600305
White JG, Southgate E, Thomson JN, Brenner S (1986) The structure of the nervous system of the nematode caenorhabditis elegans. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 314:1–340. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1986.0056
Wightman B, Ha I, Ruvkun G (1993) Posttranscriptional regulation of the heterochronic gene lin-14 by lin-4 mediates temporal pattern formation in C. elegans. Cell 75:855–862. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(93)90530-4
Williams DC, Bailey DC, Fitsanakis VA (2017) Caenorhabditis elegans as a model to assess reproductive and developmental toxicity. In: Reproductive and developmental toxicology. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 303–314
Wu Q, Li Y, Tang M, Wang D (2012) Evaluation of environmental safety concentrations of DMSA coated Fe2O3-NPs using different assay systems in nematode caenorhabditis elegans. PLoS One 7:e43729. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0043729
Wu Q, Nouara A, Li Y, Zhang M, Wang W, Tang M, Ye B, Ding J, Wang D (2013) Comparison of toxicities from three metal oxide nanoparticles at environmental relevant concentrations in nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Chemosphere 90:1123–1131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.09.019
Wu X, Wu M, Zhao JX (2014) Recent development of silica nanoparticles as delivery vectors for cancer imaging and therapy. Nanomedicine 10:297–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nano.2013.08.008
Wu Y, Han B, Li Y, Munro E, Odde DJ, Griffin EE (2018) Rapid diffusion-state switching underlies stable cytoplasmic gradients in the Caenorhabditis elegans zygote. Proc Natl Acad Sci 115:E8440–E8449. https://doi.org/10.1073/PNAS.1722162115
Yang X, Gondikas AP, Marinakos SM, Auffan M, Liu J, Hsu-Kim H, Meyer JN (2012) Mechanism of silver nanoparticle toxicity is dependent on dissolved silver and surface coating in caenorhabditis elegans. Environ Sci Technol 46:1119–1127. https://doi.org/10.1021/es202417t
Yang X, Jiang C, Hsu-Kim H, Badireddy AR, Dykstra M, Wiesner M, Hinton DE, Meyer JN (2014) Silver nanoparticle behavior, uptake, and toxicity in caenorhabditis elegans : effects of natural organic matter. Environ Sci Technol 48:3486–3495. https://doi.org/10.1021/es404444n
Yin H, Si J, Xu H, Dong J, Zheng D, Lu X, Li X (2014) Resveratrol-loaded nanoparticles reduce oxidative stress induced by radiation or amyloid-beta in transgenic Caenorhabditis elegans. J Biomed Nanotechnol 10:1536–1544
Yu S-M, Gonzalez-Moragas L, Milla M, Kolovou A, Santarella-Mellwig R, Schwab Y, Anna Laromaine Y, Roig A (2016) Bio-identity and fate of albumin-coated SPIONs evaluated in cells and by the C. elegans model. Acta Biomater 43:348–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2016.07.024
Yu Z, Yin D, Deng H (2015) The combinational effects between sulfonamides and metals on nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 111:66–71
Zhao L, Wan H, Liu Q, Wang D (2017) Multi-walled carbon nanotubes-induced alterations in microRNA let-7 and its targets activate a protection mechanism by conferring a developmental timing control. Part Fibre Toxicol 14:27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12989-017-0208-2
Zhao Y, Wang X, Wu Q, Li Y, Wang D (2015) Translocation and neurotoxicity of CdTe quantum dots in RMEs motor neurons in nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. J Hazard Mater 283:480–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.09.063
Zhao Y, Wu Q, Li Y, Wang D (2013) Translocation, transfer, and in vivo safety evaluation of engineered nanomaterials in the non-mammalian alternative toxicity assay model of nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. RSC Adv 3:5741–5757. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2ra22798c
Zhao Y, Wu Q, Tang M, Wang D (2014) The in vivo underlying mechanism for recovery response formation in nano-titanium dioxide exposed Caenorhabditis elegans after transfer to the normal condition. Nanomedicine 10:89–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nano.2013.07.004
Zhi L, Ren M, Qu M, Zhang H, Wang D (2016) Wnt ligands differentially regulate toxicity and translocation of graphene oxide through different mechanisms in caenorhabditis elegans. Sci Rep 6:39261. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep39261
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mahesh, R., Suchiang, K. (2020). Caenorhabditis elegans: A Model Organism to Decipher Biological Activities of Nanoparticles. In: Siddhardha, B., Dyavaiah, M., Kasinathan, K. (eds) Model Organisms to Study Biological Activities and Toxicity of Nanoparticles. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1702-0_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1702-0_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-1701-3
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-1702-0
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)