Abstract
This chapter endeavors to find out the roads to build a consensus from the perspective of social dilemmas. Consensus does not mean making any one party happy and is not merely half measures. Rather, it refers to discovering values that anyone can admit and can share the goals. Even if it appears controversial and conflictive, a consensus is a crystal of the process that everyone attends the attempt to seek and share a common goal. First, the literature on social dilemmas, particularly applying game experiments in social psychology, is introduced. Guiding theories, such as goal expectation theory emphasizing expectation to mutual cooperation, are presented. In the second part, game-simulation is introduced as a tool to understand the consensus process. Three studies using game-simulation are presented, where different types of players are inevitably in conflict with one another due to their different interests. Overall, the findings using game-simulation suggest that a social dilemma is not a target to be resolved but a way of framing to realize the importance of mutual cooperation. The real world is so complicated that social dilemma is one of the aspects or that it is uncertain whether society has a social dilemma structure. Under the complex situation, once individuals recognize an issue as a social dilemma, they begin to seek a common goal desirable for the entire society. Thereby, if shared recognition is established, consensus can be built resolving the conflicts beyond different interests. Attention should be paid to the process of comprehending the common goal.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abric JC (1982) Cognitive process underlying cooperation: the theory of social representation. In: Derlega VJ, Grzelak J (eds) Cooperation and helping behavior. Academic, New York, pp 74–96
Armstrong RHR, Hobson M (1973) ALEA local government gaming-simulation exercise: introduction to the York Bath Summer School exercises. Open University Press, Birmingham
Axelrod R (1984) The evolution of cooperation. Basic Book, New York
Bixenstine VE, Levitt CA, Wilson KR (1966) Collaboration among six persons in a prisoner’s dilemma game. Confl Resolut 10:488–496
Brechner KC (1977) An experimental analysis of social traps. J Exp Soc Psychol 14:552–564
Caldwell MD (1976) Communication and sex effects in a five-person prisoner’s dilemma. J Pers Soc Psychol 33:273–281
Dawes R (1975) Formal models of dilemmas in social decision-making. In: Kaplan M, Schwartz SH (eds) Human judgment and social processes. Academic, New York, pp 87–107
Dawes R (1980) Social dilemmas. Annu Rev Psychol 31:169–193
Dawes RM, McTavish J, Shaklee H (1977) Behavior, communication and assumptions about other people’s behavior in a commons dilemma situation. J Pers Soc Psychol 35:1–11
Dawes RM, Alphons JC, Kragt AJ, Orbell JM (1990) Cooperation for the benefit of us -not me, or my conscience. In: Mansbridge JJ (ed) Beyond self-interest. The University of Chicago Press, pp 97–110
Deci EL (1975) Intrinsic motivation. Plenum, New York
Deutsch M (1958) Trust and suspicion. J Confl Resolut 2:65–79
Doba M (2008) Towards symbiosis of individual and society: possibilities of social dilemma approach. In: Doba M, Shinoki M (eds) Struggle between individual and society: possibility of social dilemma approach. Minerva Press, Kyoto, pp 271–293
Duke RD, Geurts J (2004) Policy games for strategic management. Rozenberg Publishers, Amsterdam
Edney JJ, Harper CS (1978) The effects of information in a resource management problem: a social trap analog. Hum Ecol 6:387–395
Hardin G (1968) The tragedy of the commons. Science 162(3859):1243–1248. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.162.3859.1243
Hirose Y (1988) When Machiavellist become a free rider? Research group of Mathematical Sociology (eds) Advances in Mathematical Sociology. A Report of Japanese Society for the Promotion of Science, pp 151–161
Hirose Y (2000) SIMINSOC as a media for communicating multiple realities. Stud Simul Gaming 10(1):14–21
Jerdee TH, Rosen B (1974) Effects of opportunity to communicate and visibility of individual decisions on behavior in the common interest. J Appl Soc Psychol 21:190–197
Kitakaji Y, Ohnuma S (2014) Demonstrating that monitoring and penalties increase non-cooperative behavior in a social dilemma game. Jpn J Psychol 85:9–19
Kitakaji Y, Ohnuma S (2016) Even unreliable information disclosure makes people cooperate in a social dilemma: development of the “industrial waste illegal dumping game”. In: Kaneda T, Kanegae H, Toyoda Y, Rizzi P (eds) Simulation and gaming in the network society. Springer, Singapore
Kitakaji Y, Ohnuma S (2019) The detrimental effects of punishment and reward on cooperation in the industrial waste illegal dumping game. Simul Gaming 50(5):509–531
Lepper MR, Greene D (1978) The hidden costs of reward. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale
Livingston SA, Stoll CS (1973) Simulation games. The Free Press, New York
Messick DM, Brewer MB (1983) Solving social dilemmas: a review. Rev Pers Soc Psychol 4:11–44
Moscovici S (1961) La psychanalyse, son image et son public. Presses Universitaires de France, Paris
Moscovici S (1963) Attitudes and opinions. Annu Rev Psychol 14:231–260
Mulder LB, Van Dijk E, De Cremer D, Wilke HAM (2006) When Sanctions Fail to Increase Cooperation in Social Dilemmas: Considering the Presence of an Alternative Option to Defect. Pers Soc Psychol B 32:1312–1324
Nagasaka K, Sato K, Ohnuma S (2012) Development of “Emission Trading Game”: a tool for observing the process of shared social reality in a social dilemma situation. Stud Simul Gaming 22:122–136
Ohnuma S (2011) Social dilemma for consensus forming in environmental issues: is it possible to adapt interests between whole society, domestic regions and individuals? In: Hirose Y (ed) Learning social psychology through Simulated International Society Game. Nakanishiya Press, Kyoto, pp 99–113
Ohnuma S (2017) Citizen participation and procedural fairness in a policy for reduction of household wastes: process design from planning to implementation in Sapporo. In: Miyauchi T (ed) How environmental conservation succeeds?: how to proceed “adaptive governance” on the fields. Shinsensha Co., Ltd., Tokyo, pp 30–58
Ohnuma S, Kitakaji Y (2007) Development of the “industrial waste illegal dumping game” and a social dilemma approach: effects derived from the given structure of asymmetry of incentive and information. Stud Simul Gaming 17(1):5–16
Ohnuma S, Kitakaji Y (2017) Social dilemma as a device for recognition of a shared goal: development of “consensus building of wind farm game”. Stud Simul Gaming 25:107–113
Orbell JM, Van de Kragt AJ, Dawes RM (1988) Explaining discussion-induced cooperation. J Pers Soc Psychol 54(5):811–819
Ostrom E, Walker JM, Gardner R (1992) Covenants with and without a sword: self-governing is possible. Am Polit Sci Rev 86:404–417
Palys TS (1978) Simulation methods and social psychology. J Theory Soc Behav 8(3):341–368. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.1978.tb00408.x
Pruitt DG, Kimmel MJ (1977) Twenty years of experimental gaming: critique, synthesis, and suggestions for the future. Annu Rev Psychol 28:363–392
Rapoport A, Chammah A, Dwyer J, Gyr J (1962) Three-person non-zero-sum nonnegotiable games. Behav Sci 7:30–58
Rateau P, Moliner P, Guimelli C, Abric JC (2012) Social representation theory. In: Van Lange PAM, Kruglanski AW, Higgins ET (eds) Handbook of theories of social psychology, vol 2. Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington DC, pp 477–497
Shubik M (1964) Game theory and related approaches to social behavior. Wiley, New York
Shubik M (1971) The Dollar Auction game: a paradox in noncooperative behavior and escalation. J Confl Resolut 15:109–111
Trivers R (1985) Social evolution. The Benjamin/Cummings, Menlo Park
Tyler TR (2010) Why people cooperate: the role of social motivations. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Tylor M (1982) Community, anarchy and liberty. Cambridge University Press, New York
Van Lange PAM, Liebrand WBG, Messick DM, Wilke HAM (1992) Social dilemmas: the state of the art: introduction and literature review. In: Liebrand WBG, Messick DM (eds) Social dilemmas: theoretical issues and research findings. International series in experimental social psychology. Pergamon Press, Elmsford, pp 3–28
Van Vugt M, De Cremer D (1999) Leadership in social dilemmas: the effects of group identification on collective actions to provide public goods. J Pers Soc Psychol 76(4):587–599
Wit A, Wilke HA (1990) The presentation of rewards and punishments in a simulated social dilemma. Soc Behav 5:231–245
Yamagishi T (1986) The provision of a sanctioning system as a public good. J Pers Soc Psychol 51:110–116. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.1.110
Yamagishi T (1988) Seriousness of social dilemmas and the provision of a sanctioning system. Soc Psychol Q 51:32–42. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2786982
Yamagishi T (1992) Group size and the provision of a sanctioning system in a social dilemma. In: Liebrand WB, Messick GDM, Wilke H (eds) Social dilemmas: theoretical issues and research findings. International series in experimental social psychology. Pergamon Press, New York, pp 267–287
Yamagishi T, Sato K (1986) Motivational base of the public goods problem. J Pers Soc Psychol 50:67–73
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Ohnuma, S. (2021). Consensus Building: Process Design Toward Finding a Shared Recognition of Common Goal Beyond Conflicts. In: Metcalf, G.S., Kijima, K., Deguchi, H. (eds) Handbook of Systems Sciences. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0720-5_68
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0720-5_68
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-0719-9
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-0720-5
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences