Abstract
Autophagy pathway is highly conserved in all eukaryotic species and responsible for targeting of cytosol components, such as protein aggregates, damaged or unnecessary organelles, and intracellular bacterial pathogens for lysosome-dependent degradation. Besides severing as a catabolic process, autophagy pathway furthermore has been discovered to function pivotally in both innate and adaptive immune responses. At present, it has been well demonstrated that certain types of bacteria could be targeted by autophagy upon their invasion. However, several bacterial pathogens have developed strategies to evade this degradation and clearance. Here, we review the role and mechanism of autophagy in the regulation of bacteria invasion, which may facilitate the designing of clinical drugs for efficient and safe cure of infection diseases caused by toxic bacteria.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
4.1 Introduction
The autophagy process is highly conserved among eukaryotes from yeast to humans [40] and plays fundamental roles in a variety of both physiological and pathological conditions [13, 31]. In the cell, autophagy pathway selectively targets intracellular pathogens, removes damaged or excessive organelles, and eliminates potentially toxic protein aggregates. Autophagy is functional for the clearance of proteins and other macromolecules for nutrients under starvation conditions. Moreover, autophagy plays fundamental roles in a variety of both physiological and pathological conditions, such as survival during starvation, aging, metabolic diseases, cancer, and neurodegeneration [31]. Furthermore, numerous studies have linked autophagy with the innate immune responses including function in regulation of invasion, clearance, tolerance, and inflammation [8]. Autophagy could be effectively activated by immuno-receptors such as Toll-like receptors (TLRs) and NOD-like receptors (NLRs) that respond to bacterial pathogens and toxic damage-associated molecular pattern molecules (DAMPs) [6, 66]. Autophagy also functions in adaptive immune reaction by production of antigen peptides that could be presented to T cells through MHC I and MHC II molecules [16]. Furthermore, autophagy is functional for polarization of Th1/Th2 cells and activation of macrophages [67].
Autophagy is initiated at a special region associated with the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), Golgi apparatus, and ER-Golgi intermediate compartment (ERGIC) [21]. The autophagosomes fuse with the lysosomes (in mammalian cells) or the vacuoles (in yeast and plants) for final degradation [37, 64]. The autophagy process involves a group of factors called ATG (autophagy related) proteins [37]. Growth and expansion of the phagophore require class III phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3 K) complex I that comprises lipid kinase Vps34, regulatory kinase Vps15, Beclin-1/Atg6, and Atg14 [5, 30]. The PI3 K complex generates phosphatidylinositol-3-phosphate (PI3P) from phosphatidylinositol to change the lipid composition of the phagophore [44, 62]. As the only transmembrane protein essential in autophagy, Atg9 traffics and transports membrane components for the growing of phagophore [28]. Upon closing, completed formation of the phagophore, the mature autophagosome moves to, docks on and subsequently fuses with lysosome/vacuole, in a process that is mediated by the SNARE proteins syntaxin-17, SNAP29 and VAMP8 as well as the HOPS complex [68].
Upon first observation, autophagy was thought to be a nonselective degradation process. However, it has been revealed clearly that this process can selectively target protein aggregates (aggrephagy); cellular organelles such as mitochondria (mitophagy), peroxisomes (pexophagy), endoplasmic reticulum (ER-phagy), ribosomes (ribophagy), lipid droplets (lipophagy), and bacterial and virus pathogens (xenophagy) [48, 65]. In host cells, autophagy is an efficient pathway for selective engulfment and degradation of bacterial pathogens. Here, we will review generally and briefly the function of autophagy in bacterial invasion.
4.2 Autophagosome Scaffold LC3 as a Platform for Receptor-Bacteria Recruitment
Autophagy is a very evolutionarily conserved degradation pathway for lysosomal degradation of long-lived proteins, big aggregates, and whole organelles. Autophagy in yeast is usually kept at a very low level in rich medium culture condition and is dramatically induced under starvation or rapamycin treatment. Whereas in mammalian cells, autophagy level is different depending on cell background, although in most cases it is constitutively activated [7, 11, 19].
Autophagy process begins from the formation of a double-membrane vesicle called autophagosome, where LC3 is conjugated to engulf cytosolic cargoes [40]. Autophagosome grows from a single spot called phagophore assembly site (PAS), where the following steps of initiation, nucleation, elongation, and finally the closure of the cup-shaped double-layer membrane, phagophore, happen successively [50]. Genetic screens led to the identification of over 40 ATG genes function in different steps in autophagosome formation [58]. Initiation of autophagy is regulated by the Atg1/Atg13/Atg17 kinase complex, which is inhibited by target of rapamycin (TOR) kinase at rich medium culture condition. The next step, nucleation of phagophore at PAS is controlled by a lipid kinase complex containing Vps34, regulatory subunits Atg14, Atg6/Vps30, and Vps15. The following elongation step is controlled by Atg9, the only transmembrane protein in autophagy pathway that provides lipid membrane for the expanding phagophore through shuttling between various vesicle compartments and PAS depending on Atg1 and Vps34. Besides Atg9, two highly conserved ubiquitin-like protein (Atg12 and Atg8) conjugation systems, Atg12–Atg5 and Atg8-phosphatidylethanolamine (PE), also contribute to this process [46]. Ubiquitin is a small protein containing 76 amino acids and is highly conserved from yeast to human. It is tightly folded to form a globular structure composed of five-stranded beta-sheet wrapped surrounding a central helix. Ubiquitin is synthesized first as a precursor protein. Subsequent proteolytic cleavage exposes its active C-terminal glycine amino acid, which allows ubiquitin to be conjugated to a lysine (or N-terminal methionine) in the substrate protein or in the first ubiquitin moiety. A cascade of catalytic enzymes involving activating (E1), conjugating (E2) and ligating (E3) enzymes, generate ubiquitin conjugates containing either multiple mono-ubiquitin or poly-ubiquitin chains (mostly Lys48, Lys63, or linear). Diverse types of ubiquitin modification confer diverse functions, such as regulation of cytoplasm membrane receptor endocytosis, targeting proteins for degradation or functioning in signalling complex assembly [20]. Proteins containing ubiquitin-binding domains (UBDs) can act as ubiquitin receptors through interaction with ubiquitin non-covalently. The ubiquitin conjugates can be reversed by a large class of de-ubiquitinating proteases (DUBs) that cleave the ubiquitin moieties from their substrates. Atg12 was the first ubiquitin-like protein (UBL) to be identified in autophagy pathway [54]. Different from ubiquitin, it is synthesized as a C-terminal glycine-exposed form. Autophagy core protein Atg7 (E1) directly transfers Atg12 onto Atg10 (E2) in a cascade manner. Atg12 is finally conjugated to Atg5. The Atg12–Atg5 conjugate then recruits factors important for phagophore elongation and closure. The Atg12–Atg5 conjugate works together with dimerized coiled-coil protein Atg16, which promotes the association of this conjugate with PAS and phagophore elongation. The main role of Atg12–Atg5–Atg16 complex functions as E3 for the LC3-PE conjugation. LC3, another UBL functions in autophagy, similar to ubiquitin, is synthesized as a precursor and cleaved by cysteine protease Atg4. Matured form of LC3 with exposed C-terminal glycine is activated by and conjugated to Atg7 (E1), transferred to Atg3 (E2) and then finally conjugated to PE lipid incorporated in phagophore with the help of Atg12–Atg5 conjugate. Conjugation of LC3 to phagophore is essential for expansion and also important to function as a platform for recruitment of cargoes, which is mediated by autophagy receptors [2].
4.3 Autophagy Receptors for Degradation of Bacterial Pathogens
Autophagy was first considered to be a bulk degradation pathway, but it is now accepted that many autophagy receptors exist for recognition of distinct cargo substrates. Based on the category of cargoes, several types of selective autophagy have been found: aggrephagy (clearance of protein aggregates, mitophagy (clearance of damaged mitochondria), ribophagy (clearance of excessive ribosomes), xenophagy (clearance of invading pathogens), pexophagy (clearance of peroxisomes), ER-phagy (clearance of endoplasmic reticulum), nucleophagy (clearance of nuclear envelope), lipophagy (clearance of liposomes) [1]. Selective autophagy mediated by different receptors plays an important role in maintaining intracellular homeostasis.
How is it achieved for selectively targeting different cargos (such as pathogenic bacteria) by autophagy? One way is to tag the invading bacteria by ubiquitin chains through different ubiquitin ligases. After the cargo bacteria get ubiquitinated, they are recognized by several autophagy receptors. These receptor proteins serve as a bridge between the cargo bacteria and LC3 on the membranes of the nascent autophagosomes. Thus, these receptor proteins share three common feature domains: LC3 interacting region (LIR) domain, oligomerization domain and ubiquitin moiety binding domain [4, 41]. At present, there are at least four key autophagy receptors including p62, NDP52, OPTN, and TAX1BP1. p62, also called SQSTM1, is the first molecule identified to function as a mammalian autophagy receptor. Initially, p62 is implied for the function in selective autophagy degradation of ubiquitinated protein aggregates. p62 interacts with several ubiquitin ligases such as TRIM50, TRAF6, and MURF2 that ubiquitinate substrates of p62 [52]. Notably, p62 also functions in pexophagy and mitophagy. The role of p62 in antibacterial autophagy was first explored in eliminating the invading Salmonella Typhimurium [69]. Soon later, several other types of bacterial pathogens including Shigella flexneri and Mycobacterium tuberculosis were also found to be subject to selective autophagy mediated by p62 [18]. It has been found that p62 co-localizes with M. tuberculosis in host cells after its invasion and controls its survival and replication in macrophages. Consistently, knockdown of p62 upregulates the invasion and survival of infected M. tuberculosis in macrophages. Besides, p62 also exerts a role in anti-inflammation through suppressing inflammatory responses induced by globular adiponectin [60]. In addition to p62 itself, its modulating proteins are also found to be involved in xenophagy. For insistence, TBK1 kinase can stimulate p62 function in bacterial autophagy through phosphorylation of Serine 403 at the UBA domain of p62. Such phosphorylation effectively increases the function of p62 for clearance of M. tuberculosis. p62 is also shown to be activated through TAK1-mediated phosphorylation, which promotes the binding of p62 with Keap-1 and finally inhibits inflammatory reactions induced by TLR, NLR, or IL-1 cytokines [24].
NDP52 is an important autophagy receptor protein initially found in mitophagy to maintain cell health by clearance of damaged mitochondria [26]. It was also found to function in the regulation of bacterial invasion. NDP52 could transfer different types of bacterial pathogens such as Streptococcus pyogenes, Salmonella enterica, and S. flexneri by autophagy for their selective degradation [36].
Because of the redundancy of receptors, more than one receptor can target the same bacteria to autophagosomes. It has been found that p62 and NDP52 together target Shigella to autophagosomes, while p62 and NDP52 are recruited separately to Listeria [24]. NDP52 could interact with all the human LC3 orthologs with a preference for LC3C by its noncanonical LIR (CLIR) domain in antibacterial autophagy function. Ubiquitin ligase Parkin and TBK1 modify the function of NDP52 in bacterial autophagy [26]. GTPase protein Rab35 has been found to control Group A Streptococcus (GAS) degradation by autophagy through binding with NDP52 [36]. Besides, NDP52 also functions in the downregulation of inflammation by inhibiting the NF-κB signalling pathway. Optineurin (OPTN) is a 67 kDa size protein functioning in various tissues and has several domains including C-terminal zinc-finger, leucine zipper domain, an LIR domain, ubiquitin-binding UBAN domain, and coiled-coil motifs that mediate its oligomerization [57]. OPTN is found to function as autophagy receptor in mitophagy, aggrephagy, and xenophagy. Studies have found that OPTN can restrict the growth of S. enterica upon invasion [32]. Similarly, TBK1 phosphorylates OPTN within its LIR domain at Ser-177 and regulates its activity in selective autophagy. Besides, OPTN can inhibit inflammation by negatively regulating NF-κB signalling pathway [57]. In addition, OPTN also reduces ER-Stress in intestinal cell by targeting IRE1-α for degradation, which inhibits the ER based inflammation response [36]. On the other hand, OPTN mediates IRF3 activation, which results in type I IFN production for bacterial clearance [56]. TAX1BP1, also called CALCOCO3, is a closely related paralog of NDP52. Its function in xenophagy was first demonstrated by its involvement in the autophagic clearance of S. typhimurium [61]. The removal of the bacteria relied on the binding of TAX1BP1 to myosin motor VI that functions in the fusion of autophagosomes with lysosomes [47]. TAX1BP1 overexpression in the heart alleviates inflammatory reaction, oxidative stress, and cell apoptosis in Streptozotocin (STZ)-infection mouse models. It has been shown that TAX1BP1 can interact with MAVS virus, which induces the recruitment of ubiquitin ligase Itch to MAVS for its ubiquitination and degradation leading to restricted cell apoptosis [9].
4.4 Bacterial Pathogens that are Regulated by Autophagy upon Invasion
Although the exact mechanism of bacterial recognition by autophagy has not been discovered clearly, it is known that these recognition processes depend on the ubiquitination of the substrates [45]. Autophagy receptors including p62, NBR1, NDP52, OPTN, and TAX1BP1 mentioned above are a subset of pattern recognition receptors (PRRs). These receptors target ubiquitinated substrates to autophagosomes through binding LC3 [12]. At present, it has become clear that autophagy has a crucial role in the elimination of many types of pathogens [23].
The capacity to degrade bacteria by autophagy was first demonstrated in GAS. In 2004, it was found that in GAS-infected HeLa cells, almost all of the bacteria were recruited into autophagosomes. When autophagy was blocked in ATG5–/– cells, the bacteria survived within the cells [38]. Interestingly, upon invasion, the CD46 receptor could induce autophagy and GAS elimination by activating BECN1 and PI3 K complex [55]. Upon invasion, bacteria are first targeted by endosomes, several Rab GTPase family members that are found both in endocytosis and autophagy are found to be involved in bacterial autophagy, such as Rab7, Rab23, and Rab9A [42]. Several studies have shown that S. typhimurium is also a substrate of the autophagy pathway. S. typhimurium is an intracellular bacterium that usually resides in a Salmonella-containing vacuole (SCV) after invasion. In the cytosol, S. typhimurium is coated with ubiquitinated proteins detected and bound by p62, which co-localizes with LC3 and LAMP1 [59]. OPTN also plays an important role in the elimination of S. typhimurium. The kinase TBK1, which functions in activation of the transcription of type I interferons, could phosphorylate Serine177 of OPTN, thus enhances the affinity of LC3 binding with OPTN. M. tuberculosis usually infects and survives in human alveolar macrophages. Upon invasion, M. tuberculosis could arrest phagosome maturation and phagolysosomal fusion, which inhibits the processing and presentation of bacterial antigens. In 2004, studies showed that autophagy could efficiently inhibit the replication of M. tuberculosis in macrophages through elimination [23]. Interestingly, it has been found that vitamin D, or 1, 25-dihydroxy vitamin D (1,25D3), induces autophagy in human monocytes via the transcription of BECN1. Recently, it was found that upon invasion, M. tuberculosis containing phagosomes were highly labeled by LC3 and ATG12 [63]. Other than regulation of bacteria by autophagy, certain bacteria could also inhibit autophagy. For example, Legionella pneumophila could enhance the secretion of autophagosomes. Upon invasion, Legionella is internalized into a phagosome, then autophagy proteins such as ATG7 and LC3 are recruited and eventually facilitate the degradation of bacteria in lysosomes. L. pneumophila could evade autophagy by the secreted effector protein RavZ. RavZ is an ATG4-like cysteine protease that could hydrolyze the amide bond at the C-terminal of LC3 that is conjugated to phosphatidylethanolamine (PE) [10]. Beside of L. pneumophila, S. flexneri is also found to interfere with autophagy pathway. As a gram-negative pathogen, S. flexneri can escape from endosome upon invasion and transfer into cellular cytosol. S. flexneri then secrets toxin factors such as IcsB and IcsA (VirG) that can reduce binding of autophagy components like ATG5, which eventually inhibits the recognition of bacteria by the autophagy [43]. Listeria monocytogenes is an example of bacterial pathogen that can evade recognition by autophagy upon invasion. At the first phase of infection by Listeria, autophagy functions as host immune defense. In ATG5-deficient host cells, comparing to wild-type cells, L. monocytogenes rapidly replicates in mouse embryonic fibroblasts, which suggests a pivotal role for autophagy [49]. Listeria uses its surface-expressed ActA and InIK proteins to prevent its ubiquitination and recruitment of autophagy receptors such as p62 and NDP52 [15]. There are also certain bacteria that could exploit autophagic vacuole for multiplication, such as Coxiella burnetiid and Porphyromonas gingivalis, two types of bacterial pathogens that are associated with cardiovascular diseases [14, 51].
4.5 LC3-Associated Phagocytosis
Recently, a pathway named as LC3-associated phagocytosis (LAP) has been found for the function of autophagy induced by bacterial invasion (Fig. 4.1). The detailed mechanism of the LAP has not been completely understood yet. What is known at present is that LAP uses several common components of the autophagy machinery especially the LC3 conjugation system. For instance, the ubiquitin-like reaction systems for conjugation of LC3 to the membrane lipid PE, ATG12 conjugation system consists of ATG7 (E1-like) and ATG10 (E2-like), the LC3 conjugation system of ATG7 (E1-like), ATG3 (E2-like) and a complex of ATG16L1, ATG5, and ATG12 (E3-like as a complex), have been found to be similarly needed for LAP and canonical autophagy [34]. However, there are also some differences in the molecular machinery between LAP and canonical autophagy. For example, canonical autophagy is induced by the upstream kinases mTORC1 and AMPK by activating the initiation complex composed of ULKs, FIP200, ATG13, and ATG101 [40]. By contrast, LAP is induced with no necessity of this initiation complex [34]. Instead, LAP is induced by cellular surface receptors such as TLRs, Dectin-1, Dectin-2, and Mac-1/CR3/integrin αmβ2 [25]. Both initiation complex and surface receptor activation (during LAP) can induce generation of the membrane phosphor-lipid PI3P at the target sites, which is mediated by class III PI(3)K complexes (PI3 KC3) [3]. PI3 KC3 contains the core components VPS34, VPS15, Beclin-1, and different Beclin-1 binding proteins. The LAP associated PI3KC3 contains UVRAG and Rubicon which is essential for PI3P formation during LAP but negatively regulates canonical autophagy [29]. In the process of canonical autophagy, a complex containing WIPI and ATG2 bind to the PI3P generated in the target site of membranes. The WIPI-ATG2 complex then binds to PI3P and ATG16L1, which helps recruit the LC3 conjugation systems, resulting in catalytic linkage LC3 to the target membrane. For LAP pathway, ATG16L1 recruitment to the PI3P-containing target membrane sites is also essential. The second big difference in LAP and autophagy induction is that phagocyte oxidase Nox2 generated reactive oxygen species (ROS) is specifically needed for LAP but not for autophagy [17]. To activate the production of ROS, Nox2 forms a catalytic complex with the cytosolic subunits p67, p47, p40, and Rac1/2. Rubicon upregulates Nox2 activities [34]. At the moment, how Nox2-derived ROS stimulates LAP is not clear at all.
The main function of the LAP pathway is to directly promote the fusion of phagosomes with lysosomes for quick degradation of the cargo. For example, fusion of phagosomes containing microbes like Aspergillus fumigatus, Legionella dumoffii, and L. monocytogenes were efficiently targeted to lysosomes by LAP pathway [22]. Additionally, LAP also enhances the fusion with lysosomes of dead cells containing phagosomal vesicles [33]. Moreover, LAP can also delay phagosome maturation, which then results in enhanced antigen presentation by MHC II [53]. The molecular mechanisms how LAP enhances its fusion with lysosomes are not well understood. The fusion of vesicles with lysosomes relies on a number of factors such as membrane lipid composition factors, combining machinery components Rab7, RILP, PLEKHM1, and the HOPS-SNARE complex [39]. At present, the specific composition of membrane lipid of LAPosome is totally unknown. For fusion of LAPosomes with lysosomes, LC3 proteins like the GABARAP family have been found to directly bind and recruit PLEKHM1 which is an adapter protein needed for Rab7 and HOPS complex recruitment to autophagosomes [35]. Another mechanism is that LAP can promote phagosome fusion with lysosomes through enhancement of specific SNARE complex. The SNARE complex mediating fusion of phagosomes with lysosomes is composed of STX17, SNAP29, VTI1b, and lysosomal membrane anchored VAMP8 [27]. The detail and clear verification of function LAP need further molecular and genetic studies.
4.6 Conclusion
Upon invasion of bacterial pathogens, autophagy, both canonical and noncanonical autophagy pathways are stimulated react for defense. The pathogens are eventually eliminated in lysosomes transferred by autophagy process. Sensing the bacterial pathogens upon invasion induces autophagy, especially noncanonical autophagy LAP, which is a quick and direct way from invasion to lysosomal degradation. The escaped pathogens are again selectively targeted by autophagy through different bridging receptors. Autophagy is also activated by pathogen invasion, to sequester, degrade, and present antigens to host cells, leading to activated immune response against invading bacteria. However, there are also harmful effects conferred by autophagy on host cells. Through specific virulence factors, invading pathogens can evade or inhibit autophagy, or even take advantage of autophagosome for proliferation. Another thing is that in certain situations, over-enhanced autophagy activity causes excess immune response and inflammation. Thus, autophagy plays an important role in invaded host cells for the appropriate immune response to bacterial pathogens, and clinical drugs are then expected based on autophagy for treatments of various infectious diseases caused by bacterial pathogens.
References
Abert C, Martens S (2019) Studies of receptor-Atg8 interactions during selective autophagy. Methods Mol Biol 1880:189–196
Abreu S, Kriegenburg F, Gomez-Sanchez R, Mari M, Sanchez-Wandelmer J, Skytte RM, Soares GR, Zens B, Schuschnig M, Hardenberg R et al (2017) Conserved Atg8 recognition sites mediate Atg4 association with autophagosomal membranes and Atg8 deconjugation. EMBO Rep 18:765–780
Backer JM (2016) The intricate regulation and complex functions of the class III phosphoinositide 3-kinase Vps34. Biochem J 473:2251–2271
Behrends C, Fulda S (2012) Receptor proteins in selective autophagy. Int J Cell Biol 2012:673290
Bilanges B, Posor Y, Vanhaesebroeck B (2019) PI3K isoforms in cell signalling and vesicle trafficking. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 20:515–534
Biswas D, Qureshi OS, Lee WY, Croudace JE, Mura M, Lammas DA (2008) ATP-induced autophagy is associated with rapid killing of intracellular mycobacteria within human monocytes/macrophages. BMC Immunol 9:35
Cappelletti C, Galbardi B, Kapetis D, Vattemi G, Guglielmi V, Tonin P, Salerno F, Morandi L, Tomelleri G, Mantegazza R et al (2014) Autophagy, inflammation and innate immunity in inflammatory myopathies. PLoS One 9:e111490
Chaumorcel M, Souquere S, Pierron G, Codogno P, Esclatine A (2008) Human cytomegalovirus controls a new autophagy-dependent cellular antiviral defense mechanism. Autophagy 4:46–53
Choi YB, Shembade N, Parvatiyar K, Balachandran S, Harhaj EW (2017) TAX1BP1 restrains virus-induced apoptosis by facilitating itch-mediated degradation of the mitochondrial adaptor MAVS. Mol Cell Biol 37
Choy A, Dancourt J, Mugo B, O’Connor TJ, Isberg RR, Melia TJ, Roy CR (2012) The legionella effector RavZ inhibits host autophagy through irreversible Atg8 deconjugation. Science 338:1072–1076
De Paepe B, Creus KK, De Bleecker JL (2009) Role of cytokines and chemokines in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies. Curr Opin Rheumatol 21:610–616
Deretic V (2012) Autophagy: an emerging immunological paradigm. J Immunol 189:15–20
Dikic I, Elazar Z (2018) Mechanism and medical implications of mammalian autophagy. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 19:349–364
Dorn BR, Dunn WA, Progulske-Fox A (2001) Porphyromonas gingivalis traffics to autophagosomes in human coronary artery endothelial cells. Infect Immun 69:5698–5708
Dortet L, Mostowy S, Louaka AS, Gouin E, Nahori M, Wiemer EAC, Dussurget O, Cossart P (2011) Recruitment of the major vault protein by InlK: a listeria monocytogenes strategy to avoid autophagy. Plos Pathog 7
English L, Chemali M, Duron J, Rondeau C, Laplante A, Gingras D, Alexander D, Leib D, Norbury C, Lippe R et al (2009) Autophagy enhances the presentation of endogenous viral antigens on MHC class I molecules during HSV-1 infection. Nat Immunol 10:480–487
Filomeni G, De Zio D, Cecconi F (2015) Oxidative stress and autophagy: the clash between damage and metabolic needs. Cell Death Differ 22:377–388
Franco LH, Nair VR, Scharn CR, Xavier RJ, Torrealba JR, Shiloh MU, Levine B (2017) The ubiquitin ligase Smurf1 functions in selective autophagy of mycobacterium tuberculosis and anti-tuberculous host defense. Cell Host Microbe 22:421–423
Fujioka Y, Suzuki SW, Yamamoto H, Kondo-Kakuta C, Kimura Y, Hirano H, Akada R, Inagaki F, Ohsumi Y, Noda NN (2014) Structural basis of starvation-induced assembly of the autophagy initiation complex. Nat Struct Mol Biol 21:513–521
Gadhave K, Bolshette N, Ahire A, Pardeshi R, Thakur K, Trandafir C, Istrate A, Ahmed S, Lahkar M, Muresanu DF et al (2016) The ubiquitin proteasomal system: a potential target for the management of Alzheimer’s disease. J Cell Mol Med 20:1392–1407
Ge L, Melville D, Zhang M, Schekman R (2013) The ER-Golgi intermediate compartment is a key membrane source for the LC3 lipidation step of autophagosome biogenesis. Elife 2:e947
Gluschko A, Herb M, Wiegmann K, Krut O, Neiss WF, Utermohlen O, Kronke M, Schramm M (2018) The beta2 Integrin Mac-1 Induces Protective LC3-associated phagocytosis of listeria monocytogenes. Cell Host Microbe 23:324–337
Gutierrez MG, Master SS, Singh SB, Taylor GA, Colombo MI, Deretic V (2004) Autophagy is a defense mechanism inhibiting BCG and Mycobacterium tuberculosis survival in infected macrophages. Cell 119:753–766
Hashimoto K, Simmons AN, Kajino-Sakamoto R, Tsuji Y, Ninomiya-Tsuji J (2016) TAK1 regulates the Nrf2 antioxidant system through modulating p62/SQSTM1. Antioxid Redox Sig 25:953–964
Hayashi K, Taura M, Iwasaki A (2018) The interaction between IKKalpha and LC3 promotes type I interferon production through the TLR9-containing LAPosome. Sci Sig 11
Heo JM, Ordureau A, Paulo JA, Rinehart J, Harper JW (2015) The PINK1-PARKIN Mitochondrial ubiquitination pathway drives a program of OPTN/NDP52 recruitment and TBK1 activation to promote mitophagy. Mol Cell 60:7–20
Itakura E, Kishi-Itakura C, Mizushima N (2012) The hairpin-type tail-anchored SNARE syntaxin 17 targets to autophagosomes for fusion with endosomes/lysosomes. Cell 151:1256–1269
Jin M, Klionsky DJ (2014) Regulation of autophagy: modulation of the size and number of autophagosomes. FEBS Lett 588:2457–2463
Kim YM, Jung CH, Seo M, Kim EK, Park JM, Bae SS, Kim DH (2015) mTORC1 phosphorylates UVRAG to negatively regulate autophagosome and endosome maturation. Mol Cell 57:207–218
Levine B, Liu R, Dong X, Zhong Q (2015) Beclin orthologs: integrative hubs of cell signaling, membrane trafficking, and physiology. Trends Cell Biol 25:533–544
Levine B, Kroemer G (2019) Biological functions of autophagy genes: a disease perspective. Cell 176:11–42
Liu W, Jiang Y, Sun J, Geng S, Pan Z, Prinz RA, Wang C, Sun J, Jiao X, Xu X (2018) Activation of TGF-beta-activated kinase 1 (TAK1) restricts Salmonella Typhimurium growth by inducing AMPK activation and autophagy. Cell Death Dis 9:570
Martinez J, Almendinger J, Oberst A, Ness R, Dillon CP, Fitzgerald P, Hengartner MO, Green DR (2011) Microtubule-associated protein 1 light chain 3 alpha (LC3)-associated phagocytosis is required for the efficient clearance of dead cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:17396–17401
Martinez J, Malireddi RKS, Lu Q, Cunha LD, Pelletier S, Gingras S, Orchard R, Guan J, Tan H, Peng J et al (2015) Molecular characterization of LC3-associated phagocytosis reveals distinct roles for Rubicon, NOX2 and autophagy proteins. Nat Cell Biol 17:893–906
McEwan DG, Popovic D, Gubas A, Terawaki S, Suzuki H, Stadel D, Coxon FP, Miranda DSD, Bhogaraju S, Maddi K et al (2015) PLEKHM1 regulates autophagosome-lysosome fusion through HOPS complex and LC3/GABARAP proteins. Mol Cell 57:39–54
Minowa-Nozawa A, Nozawa T, Okamoto-Furuta K, Kohda H, Nakagawa I (2017) Rab35 GTPase recruits NDP52 to autophagy targets. EMBO J 36:3405
Mizushima N, Yoshimori T, Ohsumi Y (2011) The role of Atg proteins in autophagosome formation. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 27:107–132
Nakagawa I, Amano A, Mizushima N, Yamamoto A, Yamaguchi H, Kamimoto T, Nara A, Funao J, Nakata M, Tsuda K et al (2004) Autophagy defends cells against invading group A Streptococcus. Science 306:1037–1040
Nakamura S, Yoshimori T (2017) New insights into autophagosome-lysosome fusion. J Cell Sci 130:1209–1216
Nakatogawa H, Suzuki K, Kamada Y, Ohsumi Y (2009) Dynamics and diversity in autophagy mechanisms: lessons from yeast. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 10:458–467
Nguyen TD, Shaid S, Vakhrusheva O, Koschade SE, Klann K, Tholken M, Baker F, Zhang J, Oellerich T, Surun D et al (2019) Loss of the selective autophagy receptor p62 impairs murine myeloid leukemia progression and mitophagy. Blood 133:168–179
Nozawa T, Aikawa C, Goda A, Maruyama F, Hamada S, Nakagawa I (2012) The small GTPases Rab9A and Rab23 function at distinct steps in autophagy during group A Streptococcus infection. Cell Microbiol 14:1149–1165
Ogawa M, Yoshikawa Y, Kobayashi T, Mimuro H, Fukumatsu M, Kiga K, Piao Z, Ashida H, Yoshida M, Kakuta S et al (2011) A Tecpr1-dependent selective autophagy pathway targets bacterial pathogens. Cell Host Microbe 9:376–389
Ohsumi Y (2001) Molecular dissection of autophagy: two ubiquitin-like systems. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2:211–216
Peng H, Yang J, Li G, You Q, Han W, Li T, Gao D, Xie X, Lee BH, Du J et al (2017) Ubiquitination of p62/sequestosome1 activates its autophagy receptor function and controls selective autophagy upon ubiquitin stress. Cell Res 27:657–674
Periyasamy-Thandavan S, Jiang M, Schoenlein P, Dong Z (2009) Autophagy: molecular machinery, regulation, and implications for renal pathophysiology. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 297:F244–F256
Petkova DS, Verlhac P, Rozieres A, Baguet J, Claviere M, Kretz-Remy C, Mahieux R, Viret C, Faure M (2017) Distinct contributions of autophagy receptors in measles virus replication. Viruses 9
Piano ME, Folgiero V, Marcellini V, Romania P, Bellacchio E, D’Alicandro V, Bocci C, Carrozzo R, Martinelli D, Petrini S et al (2018) The Vici syndrome protein EPG5 regulates intracellular nucleic acid trafficking linking autophagy to innate and adaptive immunity. Autophagy 14:22–37
Py BF, Lipinski MM, Yuan J (2007) Autophagy limits Listeria monocytogenes intracellular growth in the early phase of primary infection. Autophagy 3:117–125
Reggiori F, Klionsky DJ (2013) Autophagic processes in yeast: mechanism, machinery and regulation. Genetics 194:341–361
Rodrigues PH, Belanger M Jr, Dunn W, Progulske-Fox A (2008) Porphyromonas gingivalis and the autophagic pathway: an innate immune interaction? Front Biosci-Landmrk 13:178–187
Rogov V, Dotsch V, Johansen T, Kirkin V (2014) Interactions between autophagy receptors and ubiquitin-like proteins form the molecular basis for selective autophagy. Mol Cell 53:167–178
Romao S, Gasser N, Becker AC, Guhl B, Bajagic M, Vanoaica D, Ziegler U, Roesler J, Dengjel J, Reichenbach J et al (2013) Autophagy proteins stabilize pathogen-containing phagosomes for prolonged MHC II antigen processing. J Cell Biol 203:757–766
Ryabovol VV, Minibayeva FV (2016) Molecular mechanisms of autophagy in plants: role of ATG8 proteins in formation and functioning of autophagosomes. Biochem (Mosc) 81:348–363
Sakurai A, Maruyama F, Funao J, Nozawa T, Aikawa C, Okahashi N, Shintani S, Hamada S, Ooshima T, Nakagawa I (2010) Specific behavior of intracellular Streptococcus pyogenes that has undergone autophagic degradation is associated with bacterial streptolysin O and host small G proteins Rab5 and Rab7. J Biol Chem 285:22666–22675
Slowicka K, Vereecke L, Mc GC, Sze M, Maelfait J, Kolpe A, Saelens X, Beyaert R, van Loo G (2016) Optineurin deficiency in mice is associated with increased sensitivity to Salmonella but does not affect proinflammatory NF-kappaB signaling. Eur J Immunol 46:971–980
Slowicka K, van Loo G (2018) Optineurin functions for optimal immunity. Front Immunol 9:769
Suzuki H, Osawa T, Fujioka Y, Noda NN (2017) Structural biology of the core autophagy machinery. Curr Opin Struct Biol 43:10–17
Thurston TL, Wandel MP, von Muhlinen N, Foeglein A, Randow F (2012) Galectin 8 targets damaged vesicles for autophagy to defend cells against bacterial invasion. Nature 482:414–418
Tilija PN, Park PH (2017) Role of p62 in the suppression of inflammatory cytokine production by adiponectin in macrophages: involvement of autophagy and p21/Nrf2 axis. Sci Rep 7:393
Tumbarello DA, Manna PT, Allen M, Bycroft M, Arden SD, Kendrick-Jones J, Buss F (2015) The autophagy receptor TAX1BP1 and the molecular motor myosin VI are required for clearance of Salmonella Typhimurium by autophagy. PLoS Pathog 11:e1005174
Wan W, You Z, Zhou L, Xu Y, Peng C, Zhou T, Yi C, Shi Y, Liu W (2018) mTORC1-regulated and HUWE1-mediated WIPI2 degradation controls autophagy flux. Mol Cell 72:303–315
Watson RO, Manzanillo PS, Cox JS (2012) Extracellular M. tuberculosis DNA targets bacteria for autophagy by activating the host DNA-sensing pathway. Cell 150:803–815
Wen X, Klionsky DJ (2016) An overview of macroautophagy in yeast. J Mol Biol 428:1681–1699
Xu Y, Eissa NT (2010) Autophagy in innate and adaptive immunity. Proc Am Thorac Soc 7:22–28
Yano T, Mita S, Ohmori H, Oshima Y, Fujimoto Y, Ueda R, Takada H, Goldman WE, Fukase K, Silverman N et al (2008) Autophagic control of listeria through intracellular innate immune recognition in drosophila. Nat Immunol 9:908–916
Yue C, Li J, Jin H, Hua K, Zhou W, Wang Y, Cheng G, Liu D, Xu L, Chen Y et al (2019) Autophagy is a defense mechanism inhibiting invasion and inflammation during high-virulent haemophilus parasuis infection in PK-15 cells. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 9:93
Zhao YG, Zhang H (2019) Autophagosome maturation: an epic journey from the ER to lysosomes. J Cell Biol 218:757–770
Zheng YT, Shahnazari S, Brech A, Lamark T, Johansen T, Brumell JH (2009) The adaptor protein p62/SQSTM1 targets invading bacteria to the autophagy pathway. J Immunol 183:5909–5916
Acknowledgments
The authors thank members from K.F. Lu laboratory for advice and help in preparing the manuscript. The K.F. Lu laboratory was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China under grant 2017YFA0506300 (to K.L.) and the National Natural Science Foundation under grants 31770820 (to K.L.).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lei, Y., Li, H., Lu, K. (2019). Autophagy Regulation of Bacterial Pathogen Invasion. In: Cui, J. (eds) Autophagy Regulation of Innate Immunity. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 1209. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0606-2_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0606-2_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-0605-5
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-0606-2
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)