Abstract
A growing number of researches and industrial projects use fiducial markers for scientific and commercial purposes. A large number of different fiducial marker types and difficulty of their comparison make impossible to reasonably and properly select a fiducial marker system for a particular task. This paper presents an efficient approach to compare different marker systems in virtual ROS/Gazebo environment and results of our pilot experiments that were conducted with ArUco and ArTag markers. The presented results show the difference of marker systems with regard to their resistance to rotations. Experiments were designed in a special way that maximally eliminates external environment influence, including light conditions, camera resolution, sensor noise, distance between a camera and a marker. In total, over 500,000 experimental outcomes were analyzed and interpreted to collect statistically significant amount of data.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kuriya, R., Tsujimura, T., Izumi, K.: Augmented reality robot navigation using infrared marker. In: 24th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), pp. 450–455. IEEE (2015)
Nourbakhsh, I.R., Kunz, C., Willeke, T.: The mobot museum robot installations: a five year experiment. In: Proceedings on IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems 4, pp. 3636–3641. IEEE (2003)
Parker, L.E., Kannan, B., Tang, F., Bailey, M.: Tightly-coupled navigation assistance in heterogeneous multi-robot teams. In: IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems 1, pp. 1016–1022. IEEE (2004)
Lim, H., Lee, Y.S.: Real-time single camera SLAM using fiducial markers. In: 2009 ICCAS-SICE, pp. 177–182. IEEE (2009)
Mutka, A., Miklic, D., Draganjac, I., Bogdan, S.: A low cost vision based localization system using fiducial markers. IFAC Proc 41, 9528–9533 (2008)
Dhiman, V., Ryde, J., Corso, J.J.: Mutual localization: Two camera relative 6-dof pose estimation from reciprocal fiducial observation. In: 2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 1347–1354. IEEE (2013)
Olson, E.: AprilTag: A robust and flexible visual fiducial system. In: 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 3400–3407. IEEE (2011)
Fiala, M.: ARTag, a fiducial marker system using digital techniques. In: 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR’05) 2, pp. 590–596. IEEE (2005)
Sagitov, A., et al.: ARTag, AprilTag and CALTag Fiducial Marker Systems: Comparison in a Presence of Partial Marker Occlusion and Rotation. In: 14 International Conference on Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics (ICINCO 2017) 2, pp. 182–191 (2017)
Romero-Ramirez, F.J., Muñoz-Salinas, R., Medina-Carnicer, R.: Speeded up detection of squared fiducial markers. Image Vis. Comput. 76, 38–47 (2018)
Hirzer, M.: Marker detection for augmented reality applications. Seminar/Project Image Analysis Graz, Technical Report (2008)
Shabalina, K., Sagitov, A., Svinin, M., Magid, E.: Comparing fiducial markers performance for a task of a humanoid robot self-calibration of manipulators: a pilot experimental study. In: International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Robotics, pp. 249–258 (2018)
Atcheson, B., Heide, F., Heidrich, W.: CALTag: high precision fiducial markers for camera calibration. Vision, Modeling, and Visualization Workshop 10, 41–48 (2010)
Woodward C., Valli S., Honkamaa P., Hakkarainen M.: Wireless 3d cad viewing on a pda device. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Asian International Mobile Computing Conference (AMOC 2002) 14, pp. 83–87 (2002)
Bonnard, Q., et al.: Chilitags 2: Robust fiducial markers for augmented reality and robotics. CHILI, EPFL (2013)
Wagner D., Schmalstieg D.: Artoolkitplus for pose tracking on mobile devices. In: Computer Vision Winter Workshop, pp. 139–146 (2007)
Lavrenov, R., Zakiev, A., Magid, E.: Automatic mapping and filtering tool: From a sensor-based occupancy grid to a 3D Gazebo octomap. In: 2017 International Conference on Mechanical, System and Control Engineering (ICMSC), pp. 190–195. IEEE (2017)
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (RFBR), project ID 18-58-45017.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Zakiev, A., Shabalina, K., Tsoy, T., Magid, E. (2020). Pilot Virtual Experiments on ArUco and ArTag Systems Comparison for Fiducial Marker Rotation Resistance. In: Ronzhin, A., Shishlakov, V. (eds) Proceedings of 14th International Conference on Electromechanics and Robotics “Zavalishin's Readings”. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 154. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9267-2_37
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9267-2_37
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-9266-5
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-9267-2
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)