Abstract
This chapter describes the cognitive processes and associated neuroscientific manifestations of expertise in surgery and other specialties where procedural acumen encompasses a component of expertise, and considers the processes by which health professions’ educators may leverage this knowledge to support the development of expertise in procedural domains. Three primary dimensions of procedural performance are considered, including perceptual expertise (the ability to accurately recognize and differentiate patterns from perceptual inputs), cognitive expertise (the ability to accurately interpret, differentiate, and render decisions in complex environments), and psychomotor expertise (the ability to anticipate and execute accurate motor responses). The foundational elements of expertise are embedded in long-term memory, and the development of expertise requires significant investment by individuals to rigorously engage in the content domain for significant periods of time. Once acquired, expertise appears to be effortless; however, neuroscience confirms that experts’ brains are highly stimulated; they are simply stimulated in different areas than novices, because they have developed different strategies for working within their expertise domain. Importantly, expertise in one domain does not transfer to another domain, primarily because of the very neuroscientific mechanisms by which expertise is developed. If domain patterns alter (e.g., open surgical procedures become laparoscopic procedures), expertise may need to be reacquired to accommodate the changes in the performance domain.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amunts K, Schlaug G, Jäncke L, Steinmetz H, Schleicher A, Dabringhaus A, Zilles K. Motor cortex and hand motor skills: structural compliance in the human brain. Hum Brain Mapp. 1997;5(3):206–15.
Bilalić M. The neuroscience of expertise. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2017. p. 225–8.
Bilalić M, Langner R, Erb M, Grodd W. Mechanisms and neural basis of object and pattern recognition: a study with chess experts. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2010;139(4):728–42.
Bilalić M, Kiesel A, Pohl C, Erb M, Grodd W. It takes two – skilled recognition of objects engages lateral areas in both hemispheres. PLoS One. 2011;6(1):e16202.
Bilalić M, Turella L, Campitelli G, Erb M, Grodd W. Expertise modulates the neural basis of context dependent recognition of objects and their relations. Hum Brain Mapp. 2012;33(11):2728–40.
Chase WG, Simon HA. Perception in chess. Cogn Psychol. 1973;4(1):55–81.
Epstein R, Kanwisher N. A cortical representation of the local visual environment. Nature. 1998;392(6676):598–601.
Ericsson KA. Deliberate practice and acquisition of expert performance: a general overview. Acad Emerg Med. 2008;15(11):988–94.
Feigenbaum EA, Simon HA. EPAM-like models of recognition and learning. Cogn Sci. 1984;8(4):305–36.
Fjell AM, Westlye LT, Amlien I, Espeseth T, Reinvang I, Raz N, Dale AM, Walhovd KB. High consistency of regional cortical thinning in aging across multiple samples. Cereb Cortex. 2009;19(9):2001–12.
Gobet F, Simon HA. Templates in chess memory: a mechanism for recalling several boards. Cogn Psychol. 1996;31(1):1–40.
Gobet F, Lane PCR, Croker S, Cheng PCH, Jones G, Oliver I, Pine JM. Chunking mechanisms in human learning. Trends Cogn Sci. 2001;5(6):236–43.
Guida A, Gobet F, Tardieu H, Nicolas S. How chunks, long-term working memory and templates offer a cognitive explanation for neuroimaging data on expertise acquisition: a two-stage framework. Brain Cogn. 2012;79(3):221–44.
Guida A, Gobet F, Nicolas S. Functional cerebral reorganization: a signature of expertise? Reexamining Guida, Gobet, Tardieu, and Nicolas’ (2012) two-stage framework. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013;7:590.
Kanwisher N, McDermott J, Chun MM. The fusiform face area: a module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. J Neurosci. 1997;17(11):4302–11.
Kundel HL, Nodine CF. Interpreting chest radiographs without visual search. Radiology. 1975;116(3):527–32.
McCandliss BD, Cohen L, Dehaene S. The visual word form area: expertise for reading in the fusiform gyrus. Trends Cogn Sci. 2003;7(7):293–9.
Mireles DE, Charness N. Computational explorations of the influence of structured knowledge on age-related cognitive decline. Psychol Aging. 2002;17(2):245–59.
Mishkin M, Ungerleider LG, Macko KA. Object vision and spatial vision: two cortical pathways. Trends Neurosci. 1983;6:414–7.
Park S, Chun MM. Different roles of the parahippocampal place area (PPA) and retrosplenial cortex (RSC) in panoramic scene perception. NeuroImage. 2009;47(4):1747–56.
Pascaual-Leone A, Nguyet D, Cohen LG, Brasil-Neto JP, Cammarota A, Hallet M. Modulation of muscle responses evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation during the acquisition of new fine motor skills. J Neurophysiol. 1995;74(3):1037–45.
Richman HB, Staszewski JJ, Simon HA. Simulation of expert memory using EPAM IV. Psychol Rev. 1995;102(2):305–30.
Rizzolatti G, Craighero L. The mirror-neuron system. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2004;27:169–92.
Sadato N. How the blind “see” Braille: lessons from functional magnetic resonance imaging. Neuroscientist. 2005;11(6):577–82.
Salthouse T. Major issues in cognitive aging. New York: Oxford University Press; 2009.
Schneider W, Chein JM. Controlled & automatic processing: behavior, theory, and biological mechanisms. Cogn Sci. 2003;27(3):525–59.
Schwarzlose RF. Separate face and body selectivity on the fusiform gyrus. J Neurosci. 2005;25(47):11055–9.
Shanteau J. Competence in experts: the role of task characteristics. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1992;53(2):252–66.
Sturman MC. Searching for the inverted U-shaped relationship between time and performance: meta-analyses of the experience/performance, tenure/performance, and age/performance relationships. J Manag. 2003;29(5):609–40.
Sullivan EV, Pfefferbaum A. Diffusion tensor imaging and aging. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2006;30(6):749–61.
Vaci N, Gula B, Bilalić M. Is age really cruel to experts? Compensatory effects of activity. Psychol Aging. 2015;30(4):740–54.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Andreatta, P. (2020). Cognitive Neuroscience Foundations of Surgical and Procedural Expertise: Focus on Theory. In: Nestel, D., Reedy, G., McKenna, L., Gough, S. (eds) Clinical Education for the Health Professions. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6106-7_22-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6106-7_22-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-6106-7
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-6106-7
eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education