Skip to main content

Successful Contracts: Integrating Design and Technology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Legal Tech, Smart Contracts and Blockchain

Abstract

Commercial contracts are sometimes ruefully described as “documents written by lawyers , for lawyers ,” artifacts of a negotiated exchange wrapped tightly in pages of clauses intended to insulate the agreement against litigation attacks. Yet this verbal padding decreases accessibility, functionality, and efficiency. Reforms to the classic forms and mentality surrounding contracting have recently been proposed, several of which look to insights and methods outside the legal system. This chapter describes two branches of those efforts: information design and computer codification . Considered separately, each could be helpful. When combined, however, and especially when employed using the values and goals of Proactive/Preventive Law , these methods can enhance communication, participation, and usefulness across the entire life-cycle of contracting: assessment of needs, gathering background resources, negotiation, commitment, implementation/monitoring, adjustment, and sometimes dispute resolution . Although challenging to integrate, better design and codification re-conceptualize contracting as a process for gathering and sharing information toward generating value and managing human and business enterprise.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    The term “Preventive Law ” was coined by Louis M. Brown in his book Preventive Law (1950). Preventive Law promotes the idea that lawyers should engage with clients as advisors and planners, rather than solely as advocates, with a view to preventing legal problems. “Proactive Law ” was developed by Helena Haapio and others to emphasize positive goal-seeking methods: “ways to use the law to create value, strengthen relationships and manage risk” (Nordic School of Proactive Law (n.d.)); and lawyers ’ role as designers helping clients achieve objectives and succeed (Haapio 2006). See, generally, Barton (2009), pp. 1–26; Berger-Walliser (2012); Siedel and Haapio (2011).

  2. 2.

    Passera et al. (2013); Waller et al. (2016), (2017); Haapio and Passera (2013); Keating and Baasch Andersen (2016); Plewe and de Rooy (2016).

  3. 3.

    Hazard and Haapio (2017); Clack et al. (2016a, b); The Linux Foundation (2015).

  4. 4.

    Stefania Passera devised and undertakes Legal Design Jams, workshops in which information designers , graphic artists, and lawyers work together to simplify, redesign, and visualize existing contracts and policies; together with Helena Haapio she advances contract redesign and simplification in conjunction with the International Association for Contract and Commercial Management (IACCM), and elsewhere; and James G. Hazard founded and directs CommonAccord.com, which collects, develops, and shares ideas and templates for contract codification .

  5. 5.

    Examples of fine integrative work, however, include Rossi and Palmirani (2017); Mabey (2018); Passera (2018a, c), and Hagan (2016b). Margaret Hagan’s innovative website http://legaltechdesign.com makes ongoing contributions.

  6. 6.

    Passera (2017); Waller et al. (2016), (2017).

  7. 7.

    Haapio and Barton (2017); Berger-Walliser et al. (2017); Barton (2016); Barton et al. (2013), (2016).

  8. 8.

    Berger-Walliser et al. (2011), p. 56.

  9. 9.

    Barton et al. (2015), p. 18, citing Lessig (2001), pp. 26–34.

  10. 10.

    For Smart Contracts as opposed to wise contracts, see Hazard and Haapio (2017).

  11. 11.

    “Be simple on the front, and smart at the back” is principle 5 in Hagan (2016a); we are indebted to her for this generative and felicitous phrase.

  12. 12.

    Brunschwig (2011). For the origins of legal visualization (Rechtsvisualisierung), see also her doctoral dissertation, Brunschwig (2001), which includes a large collection of historical images of legal norms (Rechtsnormbilder).

  13. 13.

    Visualization may deal with data, information, or knowledge, and so can be divided into three different fields: data visualization , information visualization , and knowledge visualization . The first two are mainly about computer-assisted exploration and visualization of large volumes of data, while knowledge visualization is about supporting the creation, application and communication of knowledge and insights. See, e.g., Haapio (2013), p. 12, with references; see also Infogineering: Surviving and Thriving in the Age of Information Overload (n.d.).

  14. 14.

    See, e.g., Mahler (2013); Haapio (2013); Conboy (2014); Mitchell (2016).

  15. 15.

    See, e.g., Plewe (2013).

  16. 16.

    Passera (2015); Passera et al. (2017); Waller et al. (2016).

  17. 17.

    Kay (2010); Kay and Terry (2010). For using comics to communicate contract cancellation, see Botes (2017a); for visual communication as a legal-ethical tool for informed consent in research, see Botes (2017b).

  18. 18.

    Robert de Rooy shares his story on how he developed and created the world’s first Comic Contract for this purpose at https://creative-contracts.com/our-story/. See also Vitasek (2017), (2018); Haapio et al. (2017).

  19. 19.

    This categorization is based on Passera et al. (2013) and Passera (2017).

  20. 20.

    Passera (2015), (2018b); Passera et al. (2017); Mamula and Hagel (2015); Botes (2017a).

  21. 21.

    Waller et al. (2016). Gary Crag, one of the co-authors of Waller et al. (2016), won the IACCM Contracting Excellence Award 2017 in the Social Benefit category for his work in this project, transforming the bidding and contracting process and document design . The judges applauded this initiative in social inclusion; see IACCM (2017).

  22. 22.

    Passera et al. (2016).

  23. 23.

    Brunschwig (2011).

  24. 24.

    Vitasek (2017), (2018); Dirk (2016). For this project, De Rooy won the IACCM Innovation Award (Program of Visionary Change). Comic Contracts have literally made the news, first in South Africa and later in other countries. See, e.g., Robert de Rooy’s Creative Contracts Blog at https://creative-contracts.com/blog/ and Vitasek (2017), (2018). A Google search with “comic contracts ” brings more than 2,900 results. See also Haapio et al. (2016), (2017); Plewe and de Rooy (2016). Comic contracts have also been employed effectively with literate audiences, in NDA and employment contracts, by Keating and Baasch Andersen (2016). See also Aurecon (2018).

  25. 25.

    Barton et al. (2013).

  26. 26.

    Haapio et al. (2016).

  27. 27.

    See Unsworth (2018).

  28. 28.

    Levy (2017).

  29. 29.

    Levy (2017).

  30. 30.

    Macaulay (1963); Hadfield and Bozovic (2016).

  31. 31.

    The description below is simplified. Further technical details about the CommonAccord prose objects may be found in Hazard and Haapio (2017), building on the work of Clack et al. (2016a, b).

  32. 32.

    Lee and Barton (2015).

  33. 33.

    KMStandards.com; see also kReveal at http://kreveal.com: “We read contracts…kReveal turns contract data into a business asset by connecting it to key business processes. We inform companies about everything inside their contracts by performing full-service, legacy contract analysis that is accurate and fast.”

  34. 34.

    Macaulay (1963).

  35. 35.

    For design patterns in the context of contracts and legal documents, see Haapio and Passera (in press); Waller et al. (2016); Haapio and Hagan (2016). For a Contract Design Pattern Library and a collection of further Legal Design patterns, see Legal Design Pattern Libraries (n.d.).

  36. 36.

    See, e.g., Adobe Legal Department Style Guide (n.d.).

  37. 37.

    A design system is a collection of design standards, documentation, and principles, along with a toolkit of reusable user interface patterns and code components that can be assembled together to build different applications and achieve those standards. See, e.g., Rutherford (n.d.) and Lambert (2018).

  38. 38.

    Layering is used in the context of document design so that it can be read first at a summary level that gives an overall understanding, with additional information available if needed for expert readers. A similar concept is expressed in the field of data visualization by Shneiderman’s “visual information-seeking mantra” (1996)—Overview first, zoom and filter, then details-on-demand. For examples in contract-related documents, see, Waller et al. (2016); Haapio and Passera (in press); Haapio and Hagan (2016). Creative Commons licenses offer a well-known example of a three-layer design : the Legal Code layer; the Commons Deed layer (also known as the “human readable” version of the license) summarizing and expressing some of the most important terms and conditions and working as a user-friendly interface to the Legal Code beneath; and the machine-readable layer, which recognizes that software plays an important role in the creation, copying, discovery, and distribution of works in a format that software systems can understand. See Creative Commons (n.d.). For examples of layering in the context of privacy communication, see Mabey (2018); Passera (2018c) and “Layered Notice” in the Privacy Design Pattern Library (n.d.).

  39. 39.

    Passera (2018b); Haapio and Passera (in press).

  40. 40.

    Hazard and Haapio (2017), p. 425, citing Ian Grigg.

  41. 41.

    Clack et al. (2016a, b).

  42. 42.

    Hazard and Haapio (2017).

  43. 43.

    Plewe and de Rooy (2016).

  44. 44.

    Plewe and de Rooy (2016).

  45. 45.

    For a recent report on the current status of contract automation , see IACCM and Capgemini (2018). For the related Contract Software Comparison Tool, see http://software.iaccm.com; for a list of vendors, see http://software.iaccm.com/vendors. Using a search engine on the Internet for “contract automation ” or “automated contract assembly” brings tens of thousands of results.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas D. Barton .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Barton, T.D., Haapio, H., Passera, S., Hazard, J.G. (2019). Successful Contracts: Integrating Design and Technology. In: Corrales, M., Fenwick, M., Haapio, H. (eds) Legal Tech, Smart Contracts and Blockchain. Perspectives in Law, Business and Innovation. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6086-2_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6086-2_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-6085-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-6086-2

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics