Skip to main content

Teachers as Agents and Policy Actors

The NPM and an Alternative Imagination

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Education Systems in South Asia

Part of the book series: Global Education Systems ((GES))

  • 220 Accesses

Abstract

Professional engagement, agency, and autonomy of teachers have been imagined in specific ways through recent policy guidelines on teachers’ work in South Asia. This imagination is derived from empirical research that stresses the idea of teacher accountability through studies on teacher absenteeism, teacher unions, and the relative efficacy of private schools as compared to government schools. The new public management (NPM) discourse channelizing this imagination, through policies that can orient the work of teachers in government schools, suggests solutions such as contractual teachers, performance-based pay, increased monitoring and surveillance, and para-skilling of teachers – either explicitly or by implication.

This chapter, after examining the contours of the above discourse, draws attention to the institutional context of teachers’ work in South Asia and alternative approaches that have mobilized both teachers and teacher unions toward educational reforms. The imaginations of the professional identity of the teachers and their role as policy actors are seen to be distinctively different when explored through this lens: political beings endowed with critical, reflexive agency who are able to engage with their professional beliefs and practice in productive and transformative ways, as compared to the NPM imagination that regards teachers as willful deterrents of educational reforms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ailaan, A. (2014). The voice of teachers: Learning from teachers across Pakistan. Islamabad: Alif Ailaan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aiyar, Y., & Bhattacharya, S. (2016). The post office paradox: A case study of the block level education bureaucracy. Economic and Political Weekly, 51(11), 61–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aiyar, Y., Dongre, A., & Davis, V. (2015). Education reforms, bureaucracy and the puzzles of implementation: A case study from Bihar. London: International Growth Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ali, T. (2018). Raising teachers’ voices: An in-depth qualitative inquiry into teachers’ working conditions and professional development needs in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, a province of Pakistan. Teacher Development, 22(1), 78–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrabi, T., Das, J., & Khwaja, A. I. (2015). Report cards: the impact of providing school and child test scores on educational markets. Policy Research working paper; no. WPS 7226; Impact Evaluation series Washington, D.C.: World Bank Group. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/789721468191341184/Report-cards-the-impact-of-providing-school-and-child-test-scores-on-educational-markets.

  • Ashley, L. D., Mcloughlin, C., Aslam, M., Engel, J., Wales, J., Rawal, S., & Rose, P. (2014). The role and impact of private schools in developing countries. Final report. Education Rigorous Literature Review. Retrieved from http://r4d.dfid.gov.uk/pdf/outputs/HumanDev_Evidence/Private-schools-2014.pdf

  • Atherton, P., & Kingdon, G. (2010). The relative effectiveness and costs of contract and regular teachers in India. Working Paper 15, Centre for the Study of African Economies (CSAE) University of Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aturupane, H., Glewwe, P., Ravina, R., Sonnadara, U., & Wisniewski, S. (2014). An assessment of the impacts of Sri Lanka’s program for school improvement and school report card program on students’ academic progress. The Journal of Development Studies, 50(12), 1647–1669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azim Premji Foundation. (2016). Starting and sustaining voluntary teacher forums: Experience from Tonk, Rajasthan (Field studies in education). Bangalore: Azim Premji University. Retrieved from https://azimpremjiuniversity.edu.in/SitePages/pdf/Field-Studies-In-Education-Starting-and-sustaning-VTFs-Oct-2016.pdf

  • Azim Premji Foundation. (2017). Evolution of cluster-level monthly meetings as a forum for continuous professional development of teachers: Experiences from Uttarakhand (Field studies in education). Bangalore: Azim Premji University. Retrieved from https://azimpremjiuniversity.edu.in/SitePages/pdf/Cluster-monthly-meetings-Uttarakhand-Sept-2017.pdf

  • Azim Premji Foundation. (2018). Enabling peer learning and collaboration among teachers: Case studies from Yadgir (Karnataka), Almora (Uttarakhand) and Kivarli (Rajasthan) (Field studies in education). Bangalore: Azim Premji University. Retrieved from https://azimpremjiuniversity.edu.in/SitePages/pdf/Compendium-Collaboration-and-Peer-Learning-Case-Studies-Field-Studies-in-Education-Jul-2018.pdf

  • Banerjee, A. V., Banerji, R., Duflo, E., Glennerster, R., & Khemani, S. (2010). The pitfalls of participatory programs: Evidence from a randomized evaluation in education in India. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 2(1), 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrera-Osorio, F., & Raju, D. (2017). Teacher performance pay: Experimental evidence from Pakistan. Journal of Public Economics, 148, 75–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basu, K. (2006). Teacher truancy in India: the role of culture, norms and economic incentives. New York: Cornell University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batra, P. (2005). Voice and agency of teachers: Missing link in national curriculum framework 2005. Economic and Political Weekly, 40(40), 4347–4356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behar, A. (2018). The solution lies with teachers. Seminar. Retrieved from http://www.india-seminar.com/2018/706/706_anurag_behar.htm

  • Bennell, P., & Akyeampong, K. (2007). Teacher motivation in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia (Educational paper no. 71). London: DFID.

    Google Scholar 

  • Béteille, T., Kingdon, G. G., & Muzammil, M. (2016). Teacher unions in India: Diverse and powerful. In T. Moe & S. Wiborg (Eds.), The comparative politics of education: Teachers unions and education systems around the world (pp. 239–268). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhury, N., & Parajuli, D. (2010). Giving it back: Evaluating the impact of devolution of school management to communities in Nepal (Unpublished manuscript). World Bank, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • DASRA. (2010). Making the grade: Improving Mumbai’s public schools. Online Report. Retrieved from http://www.dasra.org/n/forwebsite/dasra/Reports/MakingtheGrade.pdf

  • Duflo, E., Hanna, R., & Ryan, S. P. (2012). Incentives work: Getting teachers to come to school. American Economic Review, 102(4), 1241–1278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dundar, H., Béteille, T., Ribound, M., & Deolalikar, A. (2014). Student learning in South Asia: Challenges, opportunities, and policy priorities. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, C. (2000). Operation Blackboard: Policy implementation in Indian elementary education. Oxford: Symposium Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fontdevila, C., & Verger, A. (2015). The World Bank’s doublespeak on teachers: An analysis of ten years of lending and advice. Brussels: Education International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giroux, H. (2011). On critical pedagogy. New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of India (GoI). (2016). Economic survey 2016–2017. New Delhi: Ministry of Finance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goyal, S., & Pandey, P. (2009). Contract teachers (South Asian human development sector, Report no. 28). Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halder, P., & Rana, K. (2010). Dialoguing development: Glimpses of the Pratichi Trust’s public workshops (Pratichi occasional paper no. 5). New Delhi, Kolkata: Pratichi Trust.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, D., Gunter, H., & Bragg, J. (2013). Leadership, new public management and the re-modelling and regulation of teacher identities. International Journal of Leadership in Education: Theory and Practice, 16(2), 173–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kingdon, G. G. (2020). The private schooling phenomenon in India: A review. The Journal of Development Studies, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2020.1715943

  • Kremer, M., Chaudhury, N., Rogers, F. H., Muralidharan, K., & Hammer, J. (2005). Teacher absence in India: A snapshot. Journal of the European Economic Association, 3(2–3), 658–667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, K. (2018). Diagnostic trouble. Seminar. Retrieved from http://www.india-seminar.com/2018/706/706_krishna_kumar.htm

  • Majumdar, M. (2011). Politicians, civil servants or professionals? Teachers’ voices on their work and worth. Contemporary Education Dialogue, 8(1), 33–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mooij, J. (2008). Primary education, teachers’ professionalism and social class about motivation and demotivation of government school teachers in India. International Journal of Educational Development, 28(5), 508–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mukhopadhyay, R., & Sarangapani, P. M. (2018). Introduction: Education in India between the state and market – Concepts framing the new discourse: Quality, efficiency, accountability. In M. Jain, A. Mehendale, R. Mukhopadhyay, P. M. Sarangapani & C. Winch (Eds.), School education in India: Market, state and quality (pp. 1–27). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muralidharan, K., & Sundararaman, V. (2013). Contract teachers: Experimental evidence from India. JPAL Working Paper. Available at: http://www.povertyactionlab.org/evaluation/extra-contract-teachers-andhra-pradesh-india.

  • Muralidharan, K. (2012). Long-term effects of teacher performance pay: Experimental evidence From India. (JPAL working paper). San Diego: University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muralidharan, K., & Sundararaman, V. (2011). Teacher performance pay: Experimental evidence from India. Journal of Political Economy, 119(1), 39–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muralidharan, K., & Sundararaman, V. (2013). Contract teachers: Experimental evidence from India (National bureau of economic research no. w19440).

    Google Scholar 

  • Muralidharan, K., Das, J., Holla, A., & Mohpal, A. (2016). The fiscal cost of weak governance: Evidence from teacher absence in India (Policy research working paper 7579). Washington, DC: World Bank Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nambissan, G. (2014). Poverty, markets and elementary education in India. Working Paper no. 3 Transnational Research Group, German Historical Institute, London. Retrieved from http://www.perspectivia.net/publikationen/trg-working-papers/nambissan_markets.

  • Narayan, K., & Mooij, J. (2010). Solutions to teacher absenteeism in rural government primary schools in India: A comparison of management approaches. The Open Education Journal, 3, 63–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nawani, D. (2015). Rethinking assessment in schools. Economic and Political Weekly, 50(3), 37–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niesz, T., & Ryan, K. (2018). Teacher ownership versus scaling up system-wide educational change: The case of Activity Based Learning in South India. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 17(3), 209–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niranjanaradhya, V. P. (2014). Community participation and institutional experiences in school education: School development and monitoring committees in Karnataka. New Delhi: Oxfam India. Retrieved from https://www.oxfamindia.org/sites/default/files/2018-10/wp-communityparticipation-and-institutional-experience-in-school-education_0_0.pdf

  • Pandey, P., Goyal, S., & Sundararaman, V. (2008). Public participation, teacher accountability and school outcomes: Findings from baseline surveys in three Indian states (World Bank policy research working paper 4777). Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandey, P., Goyal, S., & Sundararaman, V. (2011). Does information improve school accountability? Results of a large randomized trial (South Asia human development sector report no. 49). New Delhi: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pritchett, L. (2015). Creating education systems coherent for learning outcomes: Making the transition from schooling to learning (Research on improving systems of education (RISE). RISE-WP-15/005). Oxford: RISE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Priyam, M. (2012). Aligning opportunities and interests: the politics of educational reform in the Indian states of Andhra Pradesh and Bihar (Doctoral dissertation, The London School of Economics and Political Science).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramachandran, V., Béteille, T., Linden, T., Dey, S., Goyal, S., & Chatterjee, P. G. (2018). Getting the right teachers into the right schools: Managing India’s teacher workforce (World Bank studies). Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramachandran, V., Das, D., Nigam, G., & Shandilya, A. (2020). Contract teachers in India: Recent trends and current status (unpublished draft).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sankar, D. (2013). Improving early childhood development through community mobilization and integrated planning for children (SASHD discussion paper series no. 59). Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sankar, D., & Linden, T. (2014). How much and what kind of teaching is there in elementary education in India? Evidence from three states (South Asia: Human development sector no. 67). Washington, DC: World Bank Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarangapani, P. M., & Mehendale, A. (2013). Multi-grade Multilevel (MGML) programme in Chhattisgarh: An Evaluation. Mumbai: Tata Institute of Social Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarangapani, P. M., Mukhopadhyay, R., & Parul, J. A. (2018). Recovering the practice and profession of teaching. In M. Jain, A. Mehendale, R. Mukhopadhyay, P. M. Sarangapani, & C. Winch (Eds.), School education in India: Market, state and quality (pp. 123–138). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar, M., & Rana, K. (2010). Roles and responsibilities of the teachers’ unions in the delivery of primary education: A case of West Bengal. Delhi, Kolkata: Pratichi Trust.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sriprakash, A. (2012). Pedagogies for development: The politics and practice of child-centred education in India. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava, P. (2016). Questioning the global scaling up of low-fee private schooling: The nexus between business, philanthropy, and PPPs. In A. Verger, C. Lubienski, & G. Steiner-Khamsi (Eds.), World yearbook of education 2016: The global education industry (pp. 248–263). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. (2008). Global monitoring report: Education for All by 2015: Will we make it? Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO Pakistan. (2006). Situation analysis of teacher education: Towards a strategic framework for teacher education and professional development. Islamabad: USAID.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rahul Mukhopadhyay .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Mukhopadhyay, R., Ali, S. (2020). Teachers as Agents and Policy Actors. In: Sarangapani, P., Pappu, R. (eds) Handbook of Education Systems in South Asia. Global Education Systems. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3309-5_29-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3309-5_29-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-3309-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-3309-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education

Publish with us

Policies and ethics