Abstract
Endometriosis is a chronic gynecologic disorder that affects ~10% of adolescent girls and premenopausal women. The condition, classically defined as the presence of endometrial glands and stroma outside of the uterine cavity, is multifactorial and highly recurrent, and causes considerable morbidities that can significantly diminish the quality of life of affected women. The disease is linked to immune dysfunctions, infertility, and increased risk for ovarian and other cancers. The histological diagnosis of endometriosis, while typically uncomplicated, may be compromised by the heterogeneity of the endometriotic foci which can manifest a spectrum of lesions with distinct and atypical features of stromal and glandular components. Moreover, signs and symptoms of endometriosis remain nonspecific and there is a current lack of predictive noninvasive markers. This chapter aims to provide current understanding of the etiology, pathogenesis, and clinicopathologic features of endometriosis and to highlight the remaining challenges clinicians and pathologists face in the diagnosis, management of symptoms, and provision of care in women with this condition.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
12.1 General Characteristics
Endometriosis is a benign, but chronic, gynecologic condition of adolescent girls and reproductive-age women. The disease is defined as the presence of viable endometrial glands and stroma in extrauterine sites and its development is widely recognized as an estrogen-dependent, pro-inflammatory process [1, 2]. Clinical sequelae of endometriosis include painful menstrual periods, pelvic pain, ovarian cysts, and/or infertility [1]. While the prevalence of endometriosis is difficult to quantify, it is estimated that 25–50% of infertile women, and 30–80% of women with pelvic pain, have a diagnosis of endometriosis [3]. Endometriosis may be a disabling condition for many women (estimated at >200 million worldwide) during the prime years of their lives, and endometriosis-related healthcare expenditures are significant [4, 5]. Treatment of endometriosis may include medical management and/or surgery [6, 7]. However, as a chronic condition without a known cure, endometriosis remains a challenge for affected women and their healthcare providers.
Endometriosis affects women of all races and ethnicities, with a strong familial association [8]. Susceptibility to endometriosis also depends on a variety of environmental, immunologic, and endocrine factors [9]. Risk factors for the development of endometriosis include early onset of menarche, longer menstrual bleeding, and short menstrual cycles, while parity and paradoxically obesity and smoking are considered protective [6]. Women with endometriosis also exhibit higher rates of concurrent pain, mood, or autoimmune conditions [10, 11].
Women with endometriosis may be asymptomatic, or may report a wide range of symptoms including dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, chronic pelvic pain, infertility, abnormal bleeding, or ovarian cysts [2]. There are currently no well-validated screening tests for endometriosis, and definitive diagnosis can only be made by surgical biopsy and histopathologic confirmation of ectopic endometrium in extrauterine locations [12]. In clinical practice, many women with suspected endometriosis receive empiric medical therapy, with hormonal suppression and/or pain control, to avoid the inherent risks of diagnostic surgery. To assist with conception in infertile women, assisted reproductive technologies such as in vitro fertilization may be employed [13]. As a chronic condition, endometriosis-related symptoms may progress, regress, or remain stable until menopause, when endometriosis generally becomes quiescent. There is increasing evidence, however, that endometriosis may persist even in the postmenopausal state [14]. Women with endometriosis have a two- to threefold increased risk for ovarian cancers and other malignancies such as endometrial and breast cancers [15].
The definitive diagnosis of endometriosis can only be made surgically, with histopathologic visualization of both endometrial glands and stroma within a surgical biopsy. Endometriosis lesions may vary in appearance at the time of laparoscopy; the classic description is that of a blue or black “powder burn lesion,” but implants may also be hemorrhagic or nonpigmented [16, 17]. However, even with experienced laparoscopic surgeons, there may be inconsistencies between suspected endometriosis (by visual appearance) and confirmed endometriosis by histopathology [16, 18, 19], highlighting the importance of histologic evaluation.
12.2 Clinical Relevance
The American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) has developed the most commonly accepted classification system for endometriosis [20]. This guideline accounts for lesion size, appearance, anatomic location, and depth of invasion of endometriotic lesions visualized during diagnostic surgery (Table 12.1). Based on these parameters, patients are stratified into four stages: stage 1 (minimal), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), and 4 (severe). Stage 1 endometriosis is characterized by small, isolated, superficial endometriosis implants on the peritoneum or within the ovaries. On the other hand, stage 4 endometriosis is characterized by numerous endometriosis lesions, which may be superficial or deeply infiltrating, in addition to dense peritoneal or pelvic adhesions, and possibly a large ovarian endometriosis cyst. The majority of women with endometriosis are assigned to stages 1–2; however, there is little correlation between stage of endometriosis and severity of pain symptoms [21]. A recent consensus statement by the World Endometriosis Society has incorporated additional endpoints that are highly relevant to women with endometriosis [22].
At present, there are no good serum markers with sufficient accuracy currently to assess the severity of endometriosis. Serum Cancer Antigen-125 (CA-125) levels have been reported to significantly differ in patients with pelvic versus extra-pelvic (i.e., pelvic > extra-pelvic) lesions [23]. Another study failed to confirm this finding and instead observed that extra-pelvic endometriosis was associated with higher patient serum CA-125 levels and lesions displaying increased expression of the epithelial-mesenchymal transcription factor ZEB1 than pelvic endometriosis [24]. The use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to distinguish endometriotic tissue from adhesions and fibrosis has been recently reported and may be suitable for the diagnosis of endometriosis at unusual anatomic sites in symptomatic patients [25].
Given the nonspecific nature of endometriosis symptoms, the diagnosis of the condition is often delayed. Indeed, while the mean age at diagnosis is ~25–29 years, most patients manifest symptoms of pelvic pain and dysmenorrhea at the start of menarche. Symptoms of endometriosis do not differ between women surgically diagnosed during adolescence compared with those diagnosed as adults [26]. A summary of the differential diagnosis of endometriosis depending on the symptom was provided in Mounsy et al. [27]. Dysmenorrhea in endometriosis may be primary or secondary. Generalized pelvic pain, while characteristic of endometriosis, may also arise from malignant or benign neoplasms, pelvic adhesions, pelvic inflammatory disease, obstructive genital anomalies, or non-gynecologic causes. Women with dyspareunia may have endometriosis but the differential diagnosis also includes pelvic infection and bowel or urinary pathology. The diagnosis becomes more challenging if the lesions are located in distal sites. Thus, direct visualization (via laparoscopy) and histological confirmation of biopsied lesions must be strongly considered for cases of suspected endometriosis to facilitate timely initiation of appropriate therapy.
Clinically useful serum biomarkers for diagnosis and staging of endometriosis and/or to differentiate endometriosis subtypes are currently lacking. Cancer Antigen (CA) 125, CA 19-9, and the cytokine interleukin-6 have been suggested as possible noninvasive markers; however, an extensive meta-analysis raised questions on their diagnostic specificity and accuracy [28]. One study reported that a four-marker panel of CA-125, macrophage chemotactic protein-1, leptin, and macrophage migration inhibitory factor could diagnose 48% of subjects with 93% accuracy [29], but this procedure has yet to be incorporated clinically. Tumor necrosis factor levels in the peritoneal fluids were found to be higher in women with than in those without endometriosis [30]; however, the test may have limited application since it relies upon an invasive procedure.
Recent studies using mouse models of endometriosis [31] and women with the condition [32] have tested the feasibility of using circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) as biomarkers for endometriosis. While the results appear promising, the accuracy and specificity of these identified miRNAs have yet to be rigorously vetted in clinical settings.
12.3 Pathogenesis of Endometriosis
Several theories have been proposed to explain the pathogenesis of endometriosis. Below, we discuss four theories which may account for the development and persistence of endometriosis in affected women. It is important to recognize that no individual theory has been accepted to fully explain this complex, multifactorial disorder [33, 34].
12.3.1 Histogenesis
12.3.1.1 Retrograde Menstruation
The concept of retrograde menstruation is the most cited explanation for the pathogenesis of endometriosis. This theory involves the retrograde flow of endometrial glands and stromal cells, sloughed during menses, through the fallopian tubes and into the peritoneal cavity [2, 35]. Implantation and proliferation of these endometrial cells then occur within ectopic sites, where they are resistant to apoptosis [9].
Support for the theory of retrograde menstruation has been demonstrated in animal models [36, 37]. In addition, the prevalence of endometriosis is increased in women with obstructive outflow tract anomalies, such as cervical stenosis, where the likelihood of retrograde menstruation is higher [1, 38]. The risk of endometriosis also increases with shorter menstrual cycles, increased menstrual frequency, and heavier menstrual flow, lending support to the role of menstruation in the pathogenesis of endometriosis [2]. Though not explained by retrograde menstruation, endometriosis lesions which develop in perineal scars following an obstetric laceration, or in abdominal incisions after cesarean delivery, are likewise best explained by the migration or transplantation of endometrial cells into ectopic, extrauterine locations.
Nevertheless, retrograde menstruation occurs frequently in women with patent fallopian tubes who do not develop endometriosis [39, 40]. In addition, endometriosis has been noted in previously hysterectomized women, and even in men undergoing treatment for prostate cancer [41]. Such findings suggest that menstruation is not definitively required for the development of endometriosis and highlight the multifactorial nature of the condition.
12.3.1.2 Metaplasia
An alternative theory is that of coelomic metaplasia. Coelomic epithelial cells are found within the peritoneal cavity, such as on the surface of the ovary, in addition to the pleural space. It is proposed that coelomic epithelial cells may undergo metaplastic transformation into endometrial cells, leading to ectopic endometrial lesions which ultimately develop into endometriosis [2, 42]. Metaplasia may be induced by exposure to chemical insults (such as menstrual fluid) or high levels of estrogen [43].
Support for this theory includes observations that endometriosis may be found in distant sites such as the pleural cavity, where coelomic epithelium exists, and that endometriosis can occur in prepubertal girls prior to the onset of menarche [33, 44]. Furthermore, case reports have demonstrated surgical evidence of endometriosis in women with Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome (defined as congenital agenesis of the uterus, cervix, and vagina due to failure of the Mullerian duct to develop), indicating that a functional uterus is expendable for the development of endometriosis [44,45,46].
12.3.1.3 Stem Cell Theory
In normal menstrual cycles, the human endometrium is continually regenerated by both local adult progenitor cells and bone marrow-derived multipotent stem cells [41]. Stem cells are undifferentiated cells which are characterized by their ability to self-renew and to later develop into a variety of mature cell types [39]. Support for the role of endometrial stem cells in the pathogenesis of endometriosis and their potential involvement in ectopic endometrial proliferation and differentiation have largely come from experimental mouse and nonhuman primate models [41].
In women with endometriosis, refluxed stem cells (via retrograde menstruation) deposited into the peritoneal cavity can subsequently undergo differentiation into endometrial glands and stroma [35, 41]. The migration of extrauterine stem cells through lymphatic or vascular channels may contribute to the development of distant endometriosis lesions [39]. Understanding the phenomenon of “stem cell trafficking” is a growing field of endometriosis research [47].
12.3.1.4 Tubal Origin of Ovarian Endometriosis
The fallopian tube has been recently proposed as a cellular contributor to the development of endometriosis [48]. About a decade ago, it was noticed that there are very early morphologic changes in cases of ovarian endometriosis, defined as “initial endometriosis” [49]. Subsequently, a study of the cellular origin of ovarian low-grade serous carcinoma found that ovarian epithelial inclusions (also called as endosalpingiosis) are most commonly derived from the fallopian tube [50]. Considering that initial endometriosis (Fig. 12.1) morphologically overlaps with ovarian epithelial inclusions, it was proposed that ovarian endometriosis, which develops from ovarian “initial endometriosis,” may also arise from the fallopian tube. In a study to evaluate this hypothesis, microarray analysis was used to compare gene expression between the fallopian tube and the endometrium of patients with ovarian endometriosis and corresponding lesions. There were significant gene expression similarities between the fallopian tube and ovarian endometriosis, compared to expression profiles between the endometria and ovarian endometriosis. It was concluded that a substantial portion of ovarian endometriosis may originate from the fallopian tube [51].
The above findings are relevant in light of growing evidence that ovarian epithelial cancers, and possibly endometrioid cancers, may originate in the fallopian tubes [52,53,54]. Additionally, epidemiologic evidence suggests that bilateral salpingectomy (defined as the surgical removal of the bilateral fallopian tubes) may decrease lifetime risk of ovarian cancer in high-risk (e.g., women with BRCA1/2 gene mutations) as well as in low-risk populations [55,56,57]. If future investigations confirm the contribution of the fallopian tubes to the pathogenesis of endometriosis, the findings may have significant therapeutic and preventative implications for reproductive-age women who have completed childbearing.
12.3.2 Etiology
12.3.2.1 Genetics
Genomic (and proteomic) studies comparing ectopic lesions and eutopic endometria from women with endometriosis with endometria from women without the disease have demonstrated altered expression of a large number of molecules, but their individual contribution as a mechanistic cause of lesion incidence and establishment remains largely undefined [58,59,60,61]. Table 12.2 provides a partial list of novel, recently identified genes that have been strongly implicated in disease establishment, based on clinical (afflicted women) and experimental (mouse models of endometriosis) observations [62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72]. The list does not include steroid hormone receptors and pro-inflammatory molecules, which are discussed in more detail in subsequent sections (below). The broad functional spectrum of the listed genes underscores the multifactorial and heterogeneous nature of the disease. Different mechanisms such as aberrant (hyper- or hypo-) methylation, somatic mutations, or posttranslational modifications involving microRNAs may explain the loss or gain of functions of these genes, leading to abnormal regulation of endometrial proliferation and apoptosis that characterize endometriosis [73,74,75].
Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have been increasingly utilized to evaluate genetic contributions to endometriosis [76]. Genetic variants in loci, predominantly located in intergenic or intronic regions and in different chromosomes, have identified WNT4 (wingless-type MMTV integration site family member 4), GREB1 (growth regulation by estrogen in breast cancer 1), FN1 (fibronectin1), ID4 (inhibitor of DNA binding 4), VEZT (verzatin), and MAP3K4 (mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase 4) as candidate genes. Nevertheless, a major challenge in the understanding of disease pathogenesis and causes of disease heterogeneity is the identification of which of these genes represent “drivers” as opposed to “passengers.”
12.3.2.2 Sex Steroid Hormones and Receptors
Dysregulation of steroid hormone signaling is a major feature of endometriosis, given the estrogen dependence of the disease. Estrogen-modulated events including cell proliferation, angiogenesis, and cyst formation are exacerbated in endometriosis due in part to alterations in the ratio of estrogen receptor (ER) isoforms ER-α and ER-β; increased local estrogen biosynthesis (due to higher aromatase enzyme activity in ectopic lesions); and decreased progesterone receptor expression leading to unopposed estrogen action [77]. The pathological overexpression of ER-β (100 times higher in endometriosis than in normal endometrial tissue) relative to ER-α is caused by deficient methylation of the ER-β promoter and has been experimentally demonstrated using a mouse model of endometriosis, to result in enhanced inflammation and reduced apoptosis in lesions leading to disease progression [78, 79]. Progesterone resistance is also a characteristic feature of endometriosis. The loss of progesterone sensitivity is due to reductions in progesterone receptor expression and transcriptional activity, promoted in part by the increased inflammatory status of endometriotic lesions [59, 80, 81]. Current drugs for the management of endometriosis are aimed at decreasing systemic and local estrogen synthesis, reducing estrogen activity, and increasing progesterone sensitivity [82]. Due to side effects from long-term use of these medications, ongoing studies continue to explore new therapies to increase efficacy with minimal discomfort [83, 84].
12.3.2.3 Immune Response and Inflammatory Factors
Recent studies have provided support to the link between endometriosis and many immune diseases. Immune dysfunctions associated with endometriosis include systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, allergies, and asthma [11, 85, 86]. Endometriosis patients (and corresponding ectopic lesions) demonstrate elevated levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines, including interleukins (IL)-1, 6, 17A, and 33 as well as macrophage-stimulating factors (e.g., granulocyte-monocyte colony-stimulating factor) than women without the disease [87]. While it is not clear whether endometriosis is a cause or a consequence of immune dysfunctions, removal of ectopic lesions was shown to significantly reduce the systemic inflammatory profiles in these women, suggesting lesions as major drivers of systemic inflammation [88]. The enhanced inflammatory status of women with endometriosis is likely caused by the highly estrogenic dependence of the disease, given the demonstrated cross talk between pro-inflammatory molecules (e.g., IL-6) and estradiol during early disease progression [89] and the role of estrogens in the recruitment of pro-inflammatory molecules within ectopic lesions [90]. Thus, recently identified estrogen receptor antagonists that can concurrently suppress estrogenic and inflammatory activities [91] may show promise as preventative and treatment strategies for endometriosis.
As mentioned earlier, the role of progesterone resistance in the progression of endometriosis may be linked to the enhanced inflammatory status of women with the disease. Gene expression analyses have shown that loss of progesterone receptor expression in lesions is associated with their higher expression of inflammatory cytokines [58, 59]. Mechanistically, it has been demonstrated that inflammatory molecules such as IL-1 and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α can significantly reduce progesterone receptor expression [81]. Conversely, progestin treatment of endometriotic stromal cells can suppress TNF-α-induced inflammation [92].
The significant contribution of pro-inflammatory molecules to endometriosis raises the interesting potential for nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs such as prostaglandin synthesis inhibitors (e.g., cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors) and diets rich in anti-inflammatory components (e.g., resveratrol in grapes) in the management of endometriosis. While there is sufficient support to these possibilities in animal models [93, 94] and in studies using endometriotic stromal cells [95], their potential has yet to be achieved in a clinical setting [96].
12.4 Pathologic Features of Endometriosis
Endometriosis, pathologically, is defined by the presence of ectopic functional endometrial tissue, which may be accompanied by cyclic bleeding induced by hormonal changes and associated with adjacent tissue response and accompanying adhesion or scar formation.
12.4.1 Clinicopathologic Types
Endometriosis lesions are most commonly located in the pelvic surface of peritoneum and ovary (peritoneal endometriosis), in the ovary as cysts lined by endometrioid mucosa (ovarian endometriomas), and in pelvic structures between the rectum and vagina as a solid mass comprised of endometriotic tissue with local adipose and fibromuscular tissue (deep-infiltrating endometriosis). Rectovaginal endometriosis accounts for 5–10% of women with disease. Endometriosis may also be established at distant locations such as the pleural space, diaphragm, or breast [16]. The implantation and proliferation of endometrial cells in ectopic sites result in inflammation, fibrosis, and distortion of normal anatomy.
The ovary and peritoneum are the most frequent locations of pelvic endometriosis. Other pelvic sites include the bowel [97] or bladder. Extra-pelvic lesions are less common, likely deeply infiltrating, and found in such anatomic locations as hepatobiliary and urinary systems, upper abdomen (lung, thorax), abdominal wall, and adrenal glands.
Diagnosis of pelvic and extra-pelvic lesions can be challenging. Endometriosis of the uterine cervix is generally asymptomatic and can be mistaken for cervical neoplasia due to the presence of a cervical mass [98, 99]. Intestinal endometriosis may present with abdominal pain or gastrointestinal bleeding [100], and the differential diagnoses may include diverticulitis, appendicitis, Crohn disease, irritable bowel syndrome, carcinoma, and lymphoma. Patients subsequently diagnosed with thoracic endometriosis may initially present with shoulder pain, catamenial pneumothorax, and/or hemoptysis [101]. In patients with bowel endometriosis, lesions display a characteristic “comet” appearance and have been associated with obliteration of the cul-de-sac and pelvic pain [102]. Abdominal wall endometriosis occurs when endometrial cells attach to the fascia or dermis at the time of obstetrical or gynecological surgery. Approximately 1% of women who have had a caesarean delivery subsequently presented with focal pain and/or palpable mass near the surgical scar which was diagnosed as endometriosis [103].
12.4.1.1 Peritoneal Endometriosis
Peritoneal endometriosis, also termed superficial endometriosis, is typically present on the surface of the peritoneum or the serosa of the peritoneal organs. Lesions of endometriosis can be single or in clusters. Grossly, they may present as raised, cystic, polypoid, or nodular.
Peritoneal endometriosis may show different colors under gross or laparoscopic examination, based on the “age” of the disease. Early lesions are typically colorless and 2–3 mm in size (Fig. 12.2).The lesions then may become red (fresh or recent bleeding) (Fig. 12.3), blue or black (old or remote bleeding) (Figs. 12.4 and 12.5), and white (inflammation and fibrosis) (Fig. 12.2), representing different stages of growth. It takes years for an early cystic colorless lesion to develop into a whitish scar-like lesion. Peritoneal lesions may be multifocal (i.e., other lesions are located within a 2 cm area) or multicentric (i.e., lesions are located beyond 2 cm from the main lesion); as many as 50 lesions may involve the peritoneum.
Presence of endometroid epithelia as well as endometrial stromal cells varies depending on the disease status. Typically, both can be found in more than 95% of red lesions, and in only 50–60% of bluish or black lesions. The clinicopathologic appearance of peritoneal endometriosis is summarized in Table 12.3.
12.4.1.2 Ovarian Endometriosis
Endometriosis in the ovary typically presents as a cystic lesion with either a single cyst or multilocular cysts. Ovarian endometriotic cysts are termed endometriomas. The cystic wall is typically thickened because of fibrotic reaction. Blood clot or condensed blood containing chocolate-like material (aptly named “chocolate cyst”) is a common gross finding (Figs. 12.6, 12.7, 12.8, and 12.9). Large cysts can form around the ovary and may acutely rupture, causing release and adherence of their contents to the abdominal cavity.
12.4.1.3 Deep-Infiltrating Endometriosis
Deep-infiltrating endometriosis (also called adenomyosis externa) is the most severe clinical form of endometriosis and in >95% of cases is associated with severe pain. It typically presents as solid, multifocal nodules larger than 0.5 cm in diameter which can grow up to 5–6 cm in size [104, 105]. In contrast to peritoneal endometriosis and ovarian endometriomas, the lesions are found deep within connective tissue and can cause massive fibrosis and muscular hyperplasia. Typically, they are present in uterine ligaments or the walls of pelvic organs such as the bladder, rectum, and pouch of Douglas (Figs. 12.10, 12.11, and 12.12). Deep-infiltrating lesions are classically diagnosed by laparoscopy and pathological evaluation to rule out occult malignancy and managed by either laparoscopy or laparotomy [106, 107]. However, these lesions may recur even after surgical management.
12.4.2 Microscopic Features of Endometriosis
Microscopically, endometriosis is composed of endometrioid glandular epithelia surrounded by endometrial-like stroma, which is enriched with capillary vessels. The cellular composition may vary between lesion types. Foci of endometriosis are commonly associated with bleeding, fibrosis, and smooth muscle proliferation. Typical microscopic findings are summarized in Table 12.4.
Microscopic findings of endometriosis are usually influenced by circulating levels of hormones, and lesions may show proliferative or secretory appearance (Fig. 12.13). Recognition of the stromal compartment can help in subtle cases. These cells typically surround the glands or lie just underneath the epithelial surface. The endometrial stroma is enriched with capillary vessels and occasionally contains well-developed spiral arteries. Typically, the stromal cells are immunopositive for CD10 (also known as common acute lymphocytic leukemia antigen, CALLA) [99], which aids in diagnosis (Fig. 12.14).
Presence of histiocytes is another microscopic feature of endometriosis. There are two kinds of histiocytes—pseudoxanthomatous cells and hemosiderin-laden macrophages; the former is more common than the latter in endometriosis (Fig. 12.15). Pseudoxanthomatous cells result from the degradation of both epithelial cells and red blood cells within the foci of endometriosis. Hemosiderin-laden macrophages are formed when red blood cells become the dominant products of endocytosis. From this perspective, the presence of pseudoxanthomatous cells is more specific for endometriosis, since any bleeding-associated lesion can present with hemosiderin-laden macrophages.
Different locations of endometriosis may have different gross and microscopic appearances, as demonstrated in representative pictures of endometriosis in the ovary (Fig. 12.9), tubal serosa (Figs. 12.16 and 12.17), uterine serosa (Figs. 12.18 and 12.19), uterine ligament (Fig. 12.10), endocervical mucosa (Figs. 12.20 and 12.21), colon (Fig. 12.22), abdominal wall after C-section (Fig. 12.23), omentum (Fig. 12.24), and lymph nodes (Fig. 12.25).
12.4.3 Differential Diagnosis
Many conditions can mimic endometriosis. These include corpus luteum cyst, endosalpingiosis, stromal hyperplasia, ectopic decidua, and rete ovarii (Table 12.5; Figs. 12.26, 12.27, 12.28, 12.29, and 12.30). The key diagnostic clue for the diagnosis of endometriosis is to find both epithelial and stromal components, although this is not always easy. While CD10 is a sensitive immunohistochemical marker of endometrial stroma in ectopic sites, especially in women with minimal disease, its use is limited in situations where the amount of stroma is sparse.
There are many other differential diagnoses pathologists should consider. For instance, deeply infiltrating endometriosis involving the colon can be confused with either metastatic cancer or cancer of the colon. When endometriosis is treated by progestin, the stromal cells become decidualized, which can raise the histologic differential diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumor. The correct diagnosis is usually not difficult if the basic concepts of endometriosis as well as the possibility of its widespread distribution are kept in mind.
12.4.4 Special Types of Endometriosis
12.4.4.1 Polypoid Endometriosis
Polypoid endometriosis is a rare type of endometriosis that presents as large lesions which may simulate polyps and are generally mistaken for malignant tumors [108]. This type of endometriosis usually accompanies typical endometriosis at other sites and/or may manifest later in women with a history of endometriosis. Lesions occur predominantly at mucosal or serosal surfaces of the colon, uterus, cervix, and vagina or within cyst cavities of the ovary but are also found, albeit less frequently, in the omentum, bladder, and retroperitoneum.
Gross features: Macroscopically, polyps are solid with a round and smooth shape [109]. Polyp size may be as large as 20 cm. It can be single or multiple, and is typically associated with bleeding and/or formation of a cystic space.
Microscopic features: Microscopically, the polypoid masses are composed of an admixture of endometrial glands and stroma; the glands are typically hyperplastic, with or without atypia, while the underlying stroma is dense (Fig. 12.31) [108]. Epithelial metaplastic changes are common. However, typical foci of endometriosis are usually present in adjacent areas.
Differential diagnosis: The most common differential diagnosis is low-grade adenosarcoma. The lack of stromal atypia and overgrowth differentiates these lesions from adenosarcoma. Other entities that may be considered in this setting include fibroepithelial polyp, polypoid adenomyoma, and Mullerian papilloma.
Prognosis: Polypoid endometriosis behaves in a similar manner to otherwise typical endometriosis. Gene expression analyses showing that vaginal polypoid endometriotic lesions exhibit highly similar profiles with those of peritoneal endometriosis [110] provide additional support to their endometriotic nature.
12.4.4.2 Stromal Endometriosis
Stromal endometriosis is another rare type of endometriosis, aptly named for the predominance of stroma and relative lack of endometrial type glands. Histologically, the lesions present as small microscopic nodules or plaques of endometrioid-type stroma superficially located just beneath the mesothelial surface, suggesting their potential origin from mesothelial or submesothelial cells via a metaplastic process [111]. Associated histological features include mesothelial proliferation, inflammation, and giant cell or granuloma formation. It can be mistaken for both malignant and benign neoplasms. Stromal endometriosis is typically seen in association with classic endometriosis and the clinical and pathological features of these lesions are similar.
12.5 Other Histological Features of Endometriosis
The histologic analyses of endometriotic lesions may be confounded by alterations in the appearance of both the glandular and stromal components in biopsies. Hormonal (Fig. 12.32) and/or metaplastic changes (Fig. 12.33) may alter the presence and/or appearance of endometriotic glands. Endometriosis, particularly cystic lesions with absent or scant glands, may be a result of the hostile surrounding environment. Those lesions with glands displaying hyperplasia or atypical hyperplasia are collectively referred to as atypical endometriosis (see below).
Reactive “nuclear atypia” in endometriotic glands presents as enlargement of the nucleus, hyperchromasia, and multiple, tiny nucleoli, with variable degrees of nucleocytomegaly (Figs. 12.34 and 12.35). These atypical nuclei are not uncommon and represent degenerative changes in the toxic environment. They could be confused with the hyperplastic process seen in true atypical endometriosis.
The stromal component of lesions may also be obscured or effaced by conditions such as fibrosis, smooth muscle metaplasia, and presence of infiltrates of foamy and pigmented histiocytes [112]. The inflammatory status affects the histologic diagnosis of endometriosis since these changes can cause associated morbidities such as infection within endometriotic cysts, florid mesothelial hyperplasia, peritoneal inclusion cysts, and pseudoxanthomatous salpingitis [112]. Complication of the diagnosis also arises when other conditions, such as peritoneal leiomyomatosis or gliomatosis, are admixed with the endometriotic foci.
12.6 Endometriosis-Associated Tumors and Its Malignant Transformation
12.6.1 Endometriosis and Ovarian Carcinoma
Endometriosis is considered to be a benign disease with pathological features resembling cancer [113]. In particular, endometriotic lesions have the ability to invade surrounding tissues, metastasize to extra-pelvic locations, evade apoptosis, and manifest enhanced angiogenesis. In a study of deep-infiltrating endometriotic lesions with no associated tumors, a significant fraction (10 of 39 cases; 26%) displayed mutations in genes (ARID1A, PIK3CA, KRAS, PPP2R1A) known to drive cancer development [75]. Such findings provide strong support to the cancer-like features of endometriosis.
The malignant transformation of endometriosis is rare, only reported in about 1% of all documented cases of endometriosis [114]. The premise that endometrioid ovarian cancer may originate from endometriosis was first described by Sampson in 1925 [113]. The three original criteria for establishing the association remain in use to date: (1) evidence of coexistence of endometriosis and tumor in the ovary; (2) exclusion of metastasis originating from other sources; and (3) presence of endometrial stroma and epithelial glands in tumors. Inclusion of histological proof demonstrating the transition of benign endometriotic lesions to neoplastic lesions was later incorporated as a fourth criterion [115].
The ovary is the most common site for the development of malignancy from endometriosis, accounting for ~80% of endometriosis-associated tumors. The rest of the endometriosis-associated malignancies are attributed to malignant transformation of extra-ovarian endometriosis such as the intestines, bladder, abdominal wall, thorax, and cervix [116]. Based on the histopathology and molecular features, ovarian cancers are categorized into five subtypes, namely high-grade serous, endometrioid, clear cell, mucinous, and low-grade serous. High-grade serous carcinoma comprises the majority of ovarian cancers (70%), followed by endometrioid (10%) and clear cell (10%) cancer subtypes. The 5-year survival for high-grade serous carcinoma (62%) is lower than that for endometrioid (100%), clear cell (75%), and mucinous (80%) carcinomas [117].
Ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) is highly associated with endometriosis, followed by endometrioid ovarian carcinoma (EOC), serous carcinoma, and mucinous carcinoma [118]. Patients with OCCC and endometriosis have been found to be significantly younger, to be more likely nulliparous, and to have poorer overall survival than those with OCCC alone [119]. Ovarian endometriosis may constitute an independent prognostic factor in OCCC since patients with OCCC and endometriosis also displayed a higher incidence of early-stage disease compared to those with non-endometriosis-associated OCCC [120]. The pathogenesis of OCCC arising from endometriosis remains unclear. Endometriosis-associated OCCC and non-endometriosis-associated OCCC exhibited similar alterations in gene sets related to the PI3K/Akt, p53, and ERBB2 pathways, with no differences in frequency [121].
12.6.2 Malignant Transformation of Endometriosis
Figure 12.36 summarizes the postulated multistep progression of benign endometriotic lesions to ovarian tumors. Atypical endometriosis is considered to represent an early intermediate step in the neoplastic progression. First described by Czernobilsky and Morris [122], atypical endometriotic lesions are characterized by the presence of epithelial cells with eosinophilic cytoplasm, large pleomorphic hyperchromatic or pale nuclei, increased nuclear-to- cytoplasmic ratios, cellular crowding, tufting, and stratification (Fig. 12.37). Atypical endometriosis is found in 8% of cases of typical endometriosis and is commonly associated with OCCC and EOC. In an earlier report of OCCC (50 total) and EOC (31 total) cases, 27 and 13, respectively, were associated with endometriosis and of these 18 of 27 and 7 of 13 exhibited atypical endometriosis [123]. In another study involving 15 EOC cases, 6 tumors were determined to have endometriosis, all of which were characterized as atypical [124]. Atypical endometriosis in these cases was found to be mixed with, or contiguous to, the tumors [123, 124]. The chronological association between atypical ovarian endometriosis and OCCC has been previously reported, with a 3-year time lapse [125]. In a case report, a 33-year-old woman who had previously undergone three laparoscopic surgeries over a period of 10 years for treatment of endometriosis was diagnosed with grade 1 EOC after her third surgery. A histological review of her lesions after the second surgery confirmed the diagnosis of atypical endometriosis [126]. These, and other related findings, suggest that atypical endometriosis is likely to be a precancerous lesion and patients with atypical endometriosis should be followed closely for extended periods to eliminate the possibility of developing ovarian cancer.
An important question remains—how may ovarian carcinoma develop from endometriotic lesions? Huntsman and his group [127] initially identified tumor suppressor ARID1A as a mutated gene in OCCC by comprehensive whole-genome sequencing of 18 samples; 6 of these samples displayed somatic ARID1A mutations. Further analyses of distinct ovarian cancer subtypes demonstrated that ARID1A mutations were highly associated with OCCC relative to EOC (55 of 119 OCCC; 10 of 33 EOC) but were not associated with high-grade serous carcinomas (0 of 76) [127]. Loss of ARID1A expression was subsequently shown in benign endometriosis, atypical endometriosis, and endometriosis-associated OCCC [128, 129]. In these samples, ARID1A loss frequently (but not exclusively) coexisted with PIK3CA mutations. The coincident mutations of ARID1A and PIK3CA in endometriotic lesions and primary OCCC have been confirmed in other studies [43]. Moreover, knockdown of ARID1A in an immortalized endometriosis cell line caused phenotypic changes (e.g., anchorage-independent growth, increased invasive ability) characteristic of neoplastic transformation [130]. The loss of ARID1A coincident with increased levels of phosphorylated gamma histone H2AX (γH2AX), and enhanced activation of the apoptotic pathway, was also demonstrated in EOC and contiguous endometriosis at greater frequencies than in benign endometriotic lesions [131]. Thus, benign endometriotic lesions carrying cancer-associated mutations in ARID1A and PIK3CA likely serve as precursors for ovarian malignancies.
In a review of databases pathologically screened for suspected cases of atypical endometriosis, Stamp et al. [132] reported that loss of ARID1A in atypical endometriosis was consistently associated with the development of ARID1A-negative endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer. In another comparison of atypical endometriosis and neoplastic lesions by targeted next-generation sequencing, ARID1A and PIK3CA genes were confirmed as frequently mutated; mutations in genes associated with Notch and Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathways [131] were also noted. Nevertheless, it remains unclear if endometriosis-associated EOC and OCCC evolve similarly, since the expression of other genes such as hepatocyte nuclear factor 1β, hypoxia-inducible factor 1α, and NFκ-B p65 was not identical between EOC and OCCC and their respective coexisting endometriotic lesions [133]. Related to the latter, it was recently proposed that OCCC and EOC may originate from distinct cells within endometriotic tissue [134].
Another potential contributory mechanism to ovarian tumorigenesis implicates the stromal compartment [135]. When compared with more distant ovarian stroma, endometriosis-associated ovarian tumors display increased expression of steroidogenic genes and enzymes involved in steroid hormone synthesis. Early changes in endometriotic stroma involving the activation of steroid hormone production may thus lead to abnormal proliferation of adjacent ovarian epithelia to promote neoplastic growth.
12.6.3 Seromucinous Carcinoma and Other Endometriosis-Associated Tumors
Seromucinous tumors and borderline tumors are less common neoplasms of the ovary. Seromucinous tumors typically display papillary architecture, an admixture of cell types, including endocervical-like mucinous, eosinophilic, squamous, clear, and signet-ring cells, and morphological overlap with low-grade serous, mucinous, and endometrioid carcinomas [136]. These tumors are associated with endometriosis at a relatively high frequency (23 of 92 cases) [117]. Similar to EOC and OCCC, they show loss of ARID1A expression due to somatic inactivation occurring with significant frequency (8 of 24 cases; 33%) [137]. Borderline tumors, first described as “semi-malignant” ovarian tumors, display biological characteristics intermediate between malignant and benign tumors and are classified to be of serous or non-serous subtypes. The serous subtype is closely related to low-grade serous carcinomas and exhibits higher potential for malignancy and recurrence [138]. By contrast, the non-serous subtype presents mostly at FIGO stage 1 and has higher overall survival. One study reported that 30% of borderline serous tumors exhibit endometriosis [139]. In a large cohort of women with subfertility [140], an increased risk for borderline tumors was associated with both ovarian and extra-ovarian endometriosis. However, in studies conducted as part of the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium, an association between borderline tumors and self-reported endometriosis was not observed [141]. Further studies are needed to clarify these associations.
Numerous analyses have shown that extra-pelvic endometriosis can also develop into malignant tumors. Abdominal endometriosis-associated clear cell carcinoma [142, 143] has been reported and additionally metastasis in the bladder and the lymph nodes was also detected [140]. Malignant transformation of deep-infiltrating endometriosis has also been reported in the pancreas [144] as well as in the appendix leading to intestinal neoplasia [145]; colon/rectum leading to endometrial stromal sarcoma [146]; vagina [147]; small intestine [114]; cervix [148]; and bladder [149]. Because these conditions are relatively rare, the mechanisms underlying their progression to neoplasia have yet to be extensively assessed.
12.7 Conclusions
The possibility that endometriosis can progress from a benign to a neoplastic condition, in addition to its comorbidities, provides a strong impetus for the early detection and effective management of the disease. To address this challenge, it is imperative in the long term to focus resources on (1) the identification of new targets to monitor early disease onset, eliminate disease recurrence, and allow targeted therapy; (2) the development of new hormonal treatments with minimal side effects and contraindications while preserving fertility and ovarian function; and (3) the fine-tuning of current technologies and development of new procedures to improve accuracy of lesion diagnosis. In the short term, continuous vigilance to reduce recurrence should be part of the standard of care for diagnosed patients.
References
Burney RO, Giudice LC. Pathogenesis and pathophysiology of endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 2012;98:511–9.
Vercellini P, Vigano P, Somigliana E, Fedele L. Endometriosis: pathogenesis and treatment. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2014;10:261–75.
Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Multiple gestation associated with infertility therapy: an American Society for Reproductive Medicine Practice Committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2012;97:825–34.
Fuldeore M, Yang H, Du EX, et al. Healthcare utilization and costs in women diagnosed with endometriosis before and after diagnosis: a longitudinal analysis of claims databases. Fertil Steril. 2015;103:163–71.
Soliman AM, Yang H, Du EX, Kelley C, Winkel C. The direct and indirect costs associated with endometriosis: a systematic literature review. Hum Reprod. 2016;31:712–22.
Parasar P, Ozcan P, Terry KL. Endometriosis: epidemiology, diagnosis and clinical management. Curr Obstet Gynecol Rep. 2017;6:34–41.
Bedaiwy MA, Alfaraj S, Yong P, Casper R. New developments in the medical treatment of endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 2017;107:555–65.
Krishnamoorthy K, Decherney AH. Genetics of endometriosis. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2017;60:531–8.
Jiang QY, Wu RJ. Growth mechanisms of endometriotic cells in implanted places: a review. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2012;28:562–7.
Smorgick N, Marsh CA, As-Sanie S, Smith YR, Quint EH. Prevalence of pain syndromes, mood conditions, and asthma in adolescents and young women with endometriosis. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2013;26:171–5.
Sinaii N, Cleary SD, Ballweg ML, Nieman LK, Stratton P. High rates of autoimmune and endocrine disorders, fibromyalgia, chronic fatigue syndrome and atopic diseases among women with endometriosis: a survey analysis. Hum Reprod. 2002;17:2715–24.
Fassbender A, Burney RO, O DF, D’Hooghe T, Giudice L. Update on biomarkers for the detection of endometriosis. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:130854.
Somigliana E, Vigano P, Benaglia L, et al. Management of endometriosis in the infertile patient. Semin Reprod Med. 2017;35:31–7.
Gemmell LC, Webster KE, Kirtley S, et al. The management of menopause in women with a history of endometriosis: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update. 2017;23:481–500.
Wilbur MA, Shih IM, Segars JH, Fader AN. Cancer implications for patients with endometriosis. Semin Reprod Med. 2017;35:110–6.
Marchino GL, Gennarelli G, Enria R, et al. Diagnosis of pelvic endometriosis with use of macroscopic versus histologic findings. Fertil Steril. 2005;84:12–5.
Jansen RP, Russell P. Nonpigmented endometriosis: clinical, laparoscopic, and pathologic definition. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1986;155:1154–9.
Albee RB Jr, Sinervo K, Fisher DT. Laparoscopic excision of lesions suggestive of endometriosis or otherwise atypical in appearance: relationship between visual findings and final histologic diagnosis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008;15:32–7.
Walter AJ, Hentz JG, Magtibay PM, Cornella JL, Magrina JF. Endometriosis: correlation between histologic and visual findings at laparoscopy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;184:1407–11; discussion 11–3
American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Revised American Society for Reproductive Medicine classification of endometriosis: 1996. Fertil Steril. 1997;67:817–21.
Milingos S, Protopapas A, Drakakis P, et al. Laparoscopic management of patients with endometriosis and chronic pelvic pain. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2003;997:269–73.
Johnson NP, Hummelshoj L, Adamson GD, et al. World Endometriosis Society consensus on the classification of endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 2017;32:315–24.
Hirsch M, Duffy JMN, Deguara CS, Davis CJ, Khan KS. Diagnostic accuracy of Cancer Antigen 125 (CA125) for endometriosis in symptomatic women: A multi-center study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017;210:102–7.
Furuya M, Masuda H, Hara K, et al. ZEB1 expression is a potential indicator of invasive endometriosis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017;96:1128–35.
Gui B, Valentini AL, Ninivaggi V, et al. Shining light in a dark landscape: MRI evaluation of unusual localization of endometriosis. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2017;23:272–81.
DiVasta AD, Vitonis AF, Laufer MR, Missmer SA. Spectrum of symptoms in women diagnosed with endometriosis during adolescence vs adulthood. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;218:324 e1–e11.
Mounsey AL, Wilgus A, Slawson DC. Diagnosis and management of endometriosis. Am Fam Physician. 2006;74:594–600.
Nisenblat V, Bossuyt PM, Shaikh R, et al. Blood biomarkers for the non-invasive diagnosis of endometriosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;5:CD012179.
Seeber B, Sammel MD, Fan X, et al. Panel of markers can accurately predict endometriosis in a subset of patients. Fertil Steril. 2008;89:1073–81.
Drosdzol-Cop A, Skrzypulec-Plinta V. Selected cytokines and glycodelin A levels in serum and peritoneal fluid in girls with endometriosis. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2012;38:1245–53.
Seifer BJ, Su D, Taylor HS. Circulating miRNAs in murine experimental endometriosis. Reprod Sci. 2017;24:376–81.
Wang W-T, Zhao Y-N, Han B-W, Hong S-J, Chen Y-Q. Circulating microRNAs identified in a genome-wide serum microRNA expression analysis as noninvasive biomarkers for endometriosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98:281–9.
Fritz MA, Speroff L. Clinical gynecologic endocrinology and infertility. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2011.
Schenken RS. Endometriosis: pathogenesis, clinical features, and diagnosis. Waltham, MA: Walters Kluwer Health; 2016.
Sourial S, Tempest N, Hapangama DK. Theories on the pathogenesis of endometriosis. Int J Reprod Med. 2014;2014:9.
D’Hooghe TM, Bambra CS, Suleman MA, et al. Development of a model of retrograde menstruation in baboons (Papio anubis). Fertil Steril. 1994;62:635–8.
Dehoux JP, Defrere S, Squifflet J, et al. Is the baboon model appropriate for endometriosis studies? Fertil Steril. 2011;96:728–33 e3.
Song X, Zhu L, Ding J, Xu T, Lang J. Clinical characteristics of congenital cervical atresia and associated endometriosis among 96 patients. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016;134:252–5.
Sasson IE, Taylor HS. Stem cells and the pathogenesis of endometriosis. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008;1127:106–15.
Halme J, Hammond MG, Hulka JF, Raj SG, Talbert LM. Retrograde menstruation in healthy women and in patients with endometriosis. Obstet Gynecol. 1984;64:151–4.
Hufnagel D, Li F, Cosar E, et al. The role of stem cells in the etiology and pathophysiology of endometriosis. Semin Reprod Med. 2015;33:333–40.
Vinatier D, Orazi G, Cosson M, Dufour P. Theories of endometriosis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2001;96:21–34.
Matsumoto T, Yamazaki M, Takahashi H, et al. Distinct β-catenin and PIK3CA mutation profiles in endometriosis-associated ovarian endometrioid and clear cell carcinomas. Am J Clin Pathol. 2015;144:452–63.
Troncon JK, Zani AC, Vieira AD, et al. Endometriosis in a patient with Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome. Case Rep Obstet Gynecol. 2014;2014:376231.
Mok-Lin EY, Wolfberg A, Hollinquist H, Laufer MR. Endometriosis in a patient with Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome and complete uterine agenesis: evidence to support the theory of coelomic metaplasia. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2010;23:e35–7.
Cho MK, Kim CH, Oh ST. Endometriosis in a patient with Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2009;35:994–6.
Pluchino N, Taylor HS. Endometriosis and stem cell trafficking. Reprod Sci. 2016;23:1616–9.
Wang Y, Mang M, Wang Y, et al. Tubal origin of ovarian endometriosis and clear cell and endometrioid carcinoma. Am J Cancer Res. 2015;5:869–79.
Zheng W, Li N, Wang J, et al. Initial endometriosis showing direct morphologic evidence of metaplasia in the pathogenesis of ovarian endometriosis. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2005;24:164–72.
Li J, Abushahin N, Pang S, et al. Tubal origin of ‘ovarian’ low-grade serous carcinoma. Mod Pathol. 2011;24:1488.
Yuan Z, Wang L, Wang Y, et al. Tubal origin of ovarian endometriosis. Mod Pathol. 2014;27:1154–62.
Corzo C, Iniesta MD, Patrono MG, Lu KH, Ramirez PT. Role of fallopian tubes in the development of ovarian cancer. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017;24:230–4.
Erickson BK, Conner MG, Landen CN Jr. The role of the fallopian tube in the origin of ovarian cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;209:409–14.
Li J, Fadare O, Xiang L, Kong B, Zheng W. Ovarian serous carcinoma: recent concepts on its origin and carcinogenesis. J Hematol Oncol. 2012;5:8.
Long Roche KC, Abu-Rustum NR, Nourmoussavi M, Zivanovic O. Risk-reducing salpingectomy: let us be opportunistic. Cancer. 2017;123:1714–20.
Walker JL, Powell CB, Chen LM, et al. Society of Gynecologic Oncology recommendations for the prevention of ovarian cancer. Cancer. 2015;121:2108–20.
Perez-Lopez FR, Ceausu I, Depypere H, et al. Interventions to reduce the risk of ovarian and fallopian tube cancer: A European Menopause and Andropause Society Position Statement. Maturitas. 2017;100:86–91.
Aghajanova L, Giudice LC. Molecular evidence for differences in endometrium in severe versus mild endometriosis. Reprod Sci. 2011;18:229–51.
Pabona JM, Simmen FA, Nikiforov MA, et al. Kruppel-like factor 9 and progesterone receptor coregulation of decidualizing endometrial stromal cells: implications for the pathogenesis of endometriosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97:E376–92.
Fassbender A, Verbeeck N, Bornigen D, et al. Combined mRNA microarray and proteomic analysis of eutopic endometrium of women with and without endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 2012;27:2020–9.
Tamaresis JS, Irwin JC, Goldfien GA, et al. Molecular classification of endometriosis and disease stage using high-dimensional genomic data. Endocrinology. 2014;155:4986–99.
Browne H, Taylor H. HOXA10 expression in ectopic endometrial tissue. Fertil Steril. 2006;85:1386–90.
Fang Z, Yang S, Gurates B, et al. Genetic or enzymatic disruption of aromatase inhibits the growth of ectopic uterine tissue. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;87:3460–6.
Bulun SE, Zeitoun KM, Takayama K, Sasano H. Estrogen biosynthesis in endometriosis: molecular basis and clinical relevance. J Mol Endocrinol. 2000;25:35–42.
Han SJ, Hawkins SM, Begum K, et al. A new isoform of steroid receptor coactivator-1 is crucial for pathogenic progression of endometriosis. Nat Med. 2012;18:1102–11.
Lin SC, Li YH, Wu MH, et al. Suppression of COUP-TFII by proinflammatory cytokines contributes to the pathogenesis of endometriosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99:E427–37.
Yu J, Boicea A, Barrett KL, et al. Reduced connexin 43 in eutopic endometrium and cultured endometrial stromal cells from subjects with endometriosis. Mol Hum Reprod. 2014;20:260–70.
Heard ME, Simmons CD, Simmen FA, Simmen RC. Kruppel-like factor 9 deficiency in uterine endometrial cells promotes ectopic lesion establishment associated with activated notch and hedgehog signaling in a mouse model of endometriosis. Endocrinology. 2014;155:1532–46.
Zhao Y, Chen Y, Kuang Y, et al. Multiple Beneficial roles of repressor of estrogen receptor activity (REA) in suppressing the progression of endometriosis. Endocrinology. 2016;157:900–12.
Lv J, Zhu Q, Jia X, Yu N, Li Q. In vitro and in vivo effects of tumor suppressor gene PTEN on endometriosis: an experimental study. Med Sci Monit. 2016;22:3727–36.
Govatati S, Kodati VL, Deenadayal M, et al. Mutations in the PTEN tumor gene and risk of endometriosis: a case-control study. Hum Reprod. 2014;29:324–36.
Yoo JY, Kim TH, Fazleabas AT, et al. KRAS activation and over-expression of SIRT1/BCL6 contributes to the pathogenesis of endometriosis and progesterone resistance. Sci Rep. 2017;7:6765.
Naqvi H, Ilagan Y, Krikun G, Taylor HS. Altered genome-wide methylation in endometriosis. Reprod Sci. 2014;21:1237–43.
Houshdaran S, Nezhat CR, Vo KC, et al. Aberrant endometrial DNA methylome and associated gene expression in women with endometriosis. Biol Reprod. 2016;95:93.
Anglesio MS, Papadopoulos N, Ayhan A, et al. Cancer-associated mutations in endometriosis without cancer. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:1835–48.
Zondervan KT, Rahmioglu N, Morris AP, et al. Beyond endometriosis genome-wide association study: from genomics to phenomics to the patient. Semin Reprod Med. 2016;34:242–54.
Bulun SE, Monsavais D, Pavone ME, et al. Role of estrogen receptor-beta in endometriosis. Semin Reprod Med. 2012;30:39–45.
Han SJ, Jung SY, Wu SP, et al. Estrogen receptor beta modulates apoptosis complexes and the inflammasome to drive the pathogenesis of endometriosis. Cell. 2015;163:960–74.
Simmen RC, Kelley AS. Reversal of fortune: estrogen receptor-beta in endometriosis. J Mol Endocrinol. 2016;57:F23–7.
Al-Sabbagh M, Lam EW, Brosens JJ. Mechanisms of endometrial progesterone resistance. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2012;358:208–15.
Grandi G, Mueller MD, Papadia A, et al. Inflammation influences steroid hormone receptors targeted by progestins in endometrial stromal cells from women with endometriosis. J Reprod Immunol. 2016;117:30–8.
Tosti C, Biscione A, Morgante G, et al. Hormonal therapy for endometriosis: from molecular research to bedside. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017;209:61–6.
Donnez J, Taylor RN, Taylor HS. Partial suppression of estradiol: a new strategy in endometriosis management? Fertil Steril. 2017;107:568–70.
Taylor HS, Giudice LC, Lessey BA, et al. Treatment of endometriosis-associated pain with elagolix, an oral GnRH antagonist. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:28–40.
Matalliotakis I, Cakmak H, Matalliotakis M, Kappou D, Arici A. High rate of allergies among women with endometriosis. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2012;32:291–3.
Harris HR, Costenbader KH, Mu F, et al. Endometriosis and the risks of systemic lupus erythematosus and rheumatoid arthritis in the Nurses’ Health Study II. Ann Rheum Dis. 2016;75:1279–84.
Ahn SH, Khalaj K, Young SL, et al. Immune-inflammation gene signatures in endometriosis patients. Fertil Steril. 2016;106:1420–31 e7.
Monsanto SP, Edwards AK, Zhou J, et al. Surgical removal of endometriotic lesions alters local and systemic proinflammatory cytokines in endometriosis patients. Fertil Steril. 2016;105:968–77 e5.
Burns KA, Thomas SY, Hamilton KJ, et al. Early endometriosis in females is directed by immune-mediated estrogen receptor alpha and IL-6 cross-talk. Endocrinology. 2018;159:103–18.
Greaves E, Temp J, Esnal-Zufiurre A, et al. Estradiol is a critical mediator of macrophage-nerve cross talk in peritoneal endometriosis. Am J Pathol. 2015;185:2286–97.
Zhao Y, Gong P, Chen Y, et al. Dual suppression of estrogenic and inflammatory activities for targeting of endometriosis. Sci Transl Med. 2015;7:271ra9.
Grandi G, Mueller M, Bersinger N, et al. Progestin suppressed inflammation and cell viability of tumor necrosis factor-alpha-stimulated endometriotic stromal cells. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2016;76:292–8.
Ahmad SF, Akoum A, Horne AW. Selective modulation of the prostaglandin F2alpha pathway markedly impacts on endometriosis progression in a xenograft mouse model. Mol Hum Reprod. 2015;21:905–16.
Rudzitis-Auth J, Menger MD, Laschke MW. Resveratrol is a potent inhibitor of vascularization and cell proliferation in experimental endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 2013;28:1339–47.
Taguchi A, Wada-Hiraike O, Kawana K, et al. Resveratrol suppresses inflammatory responses in endometrial stromal cells derived from endometriosis: a possible role of the sirtuin 1 pathway. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2014;40:770–8.
Mendes da Silva D, Gross LA, Neto EPG, Lessey BA, Savaris RF. The use of resveratrol as an adjuvant treatment of pain in endometriosis: a randomized clinical trial. J Endocr Soc. 2017;1:359–69.
Nezhat C, Li A, Falik R, et al. Bowel endometriosis: diagnosis and management. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;218(6):549–62.
Jaiman S, Gundabattula SR, Pochiraju M, Sangireddy JR. Polypoid endometriosis of the cervix: a case report and review of the literature. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014;289:915–20.
Benacerraf BR, Groszmann Y, Hornstein MD, Bromley B. Deep infiltrating endometriosis of the bowel wall: the comet sign. J Ultrasound Med. 2015;34:537–42.
Yantiss RK, Clement PB, Young RH. Endometriosis of the intestinal tract: a study of 44 cases of a disease that may cause diverse challenges in clinical and pathologic evaluation. Am J Surg Pathol. 2001;25:445–54.
Nezhat C, Kazerooni T, Berker B, et al. Laparoscopic management of hepatic endometriosis: report of two cases and review of the literature. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2005;12:196–200.
Seval MM, Cavkaytar S, Atak Z, Guresci S. Postcoital bleeding due to cervical endometriosis. BMJ Case Rep. 2013;2013
Hensen JH, Van Breda Vriesman AC, Puylaert JB. Abdominal wall endometriosis: clinical presentation and imaging features with emphasis on sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;186:616–20.
Koninckx PR, Ussia A, Adamyan L, et al. Deep endometriosis: definition, diagnosis, and treatment. Fertil Steril. 2012;98:564–71.
Tosti C, Pinzauti S, Santulli P, et al. Pathogenetic mechanisms of deep infiltrating endometriosis. Reprod Sci. 2015;22:1053–9.
Redwine DB. Diaphragmatic endometriosis: diagnosis, surgical management, and long-term results of treatment. Fertil Steril. 2002;77:288–96.
Nezhat C, Main J, Paka C, et al. Multidisciplinary treatment for thoracic and abdominopelvic endometriosis. JSLS. 2014;18:e2014.00312.
Parker RL, Dadmanesh F, Young RH, Clement PB. Polypoid endometriosis: a clinicopathologic analysis of 24 cases and a review of the literature. Am J Surg Pathol. 2004;28:285–97.
Stewart CJ, Bharat C. Clinicopathological and immunohistological features of polypoid endometriosis. Histopathology. 2016;68:398–404.
Syrcle S, Pelch K, Schroder A, et al. Altered gene expression profile in vaginal polypoid endometriosis resembles peritoneal endometriosis and is consistent with increased local estrogen production. Gynecol Obstet Investig. 2011;71:77–86.
Boyle DP, McCluggage WG. Peritoneal stromal endometriosis: a detailed morphological analysis of a large series of cases of a common and under-recognised form of endometriosis. J Clin Pathol. 2009;62:530–3.
Clement PB. The pathology of endometriosis: a survey of the many faces of a common disease emphasizing diagnostic pitfalls and unusual and newly appreciated aspects. Adv Anat Pathol. 2007;14:241–60.
Wei JJ, William J, Bulun S. Endometriosis and ovarian cancer: a review of clinical, pathologic, and molecular aspects. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2011;30:553–68.
Ogi Y, Yamaguchi T, Kinugasa Y, et al. A case of small intestinal endometrioid adenocarcinoma. Surg Case Rep. 2016;2:97.
Scott RB. Malignant changes in endometriosis. Obstet Gynecol. 1953;2:283–9.
Krawczyk N, Banys-Paluchowski M, Schmidt D, Ulrich U, Fehm T. Endometriosis-associated malignancy. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2016;76:176–81.
Karpathiou G, Chauleur C, Corsini T, et al. Seromucinous ovarian tumor. A comparison with the rest of ovarian epithelial tumors. Ann Diagn Pathol. 2017;27:28–33.
Somigliana E, Parazzini F, Stoppelli S, et al. Association between endometriosis and cancer: a comprehensive review and a critical analysis of clinical and epidemiological evidence. Gynecol Oncol. 2006;101:331–41.
Schnack TH, Høgdall E, Thomsen LN, Høgdall C. Demographic, clinical, and prognostic factors of ovarian clear cell adenocarcinomas according to endometriosis status. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2017;27:1804–12.
Park J-Y, Kim D-Y, Suh D-S, et al. Significance of ovarian endometriosis on the prognosis of ovarian clear cell carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2018;28:11–8.
Kim SI, Lee JW, Lee M, et al. Genomic landscape of ovarian clear cell carcinoma via whole exome sequencing. Gynecol Oncol. 2018;148:375–82.
Czernobilsky B, Morris WJ. A histologic study of ovarian endometriosis with emphasis on hyperplastic and atypical changes. Obstet Gynecol. 1979;53:318–23.
Fukunaga M, Nomura K, Ishikawa E, Ushigome S. Ovarian atypical endometriosis: its close association with malignant epithelial tumours. Histopathology. 1997;30:249–55.
Terada T. Endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the ovary arising in atypical endometriosis. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2012;5:924–7.
Moll UM, Chumas JC, Chalas E, Mann WJ. Ovarian carcinoma arising in atypical endometriosis. Obstet Gynecol. 1990;75:537–9.
Tanase Y, Furukawa N, Kobayashi H, Matsumoto T. Malignant transformation from endometriosis to atypical endometriosis and finally to endometrioid adenocarcinoma within 10 years. Case Rep Oncol. 2013;6:480–4.
Wiegand KC, Shah SP, Al-Agha OM, et al. ARID1A mutations in endometriosis-associated ovarian carcinomas. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:1532–43.
Ayhan A, Mao T-L, Seckin T, et al. Loss of ARID1A expression is an early molecular event in tumor progression from ovarian endometriotic cyst to clear cell and endometrioid carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2012;22:1310.
Yamamoto S, Tsuda H, Takano M, et al. Loss of ARID1A protein expression occurs as an early event in ovarian clear-cell carcinoma development and frequently coexists with PIK3CA mutations. Mod Pathol. 2012;25:615.
Lakshminarasimhan R, Andreu-Vieyra C, Lawrenson K, et al. Down-regulation of ARID1A is sufficient to initiate neoplastic transformation along with epigenetic reprogramming in non-tumorigenic endometriotic cells. Cancer Lett. 2017;401:11–9.
Chene G, Ouellet V, Rahimi K, et al. The ARID1A pathway in ovarian clear cell and endometrioid carcinoma, contiguous endometriosis, and benign endometriosis. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015;130:27–30.
Stamp JP, Gilks CB, Wesseling M, et al. BAF250a expression in atypical endometriosis and endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2016;26:825–32.
Er TK, Su YF, Wu CC, et al. Targeted next-generation sequencing for molecular diagnosis of endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer. J Mol Med. 2016;94:835–47.
Cochrane DR, Tessier-Cloutier B, Lawrence KM, et al. Clear cell and endometrioid carcinomas: are their differences attributable to distinct cells of origin? J Pathol. 2017;243:26–36.
Blanco LZ Jr, Kuhn E, Morrison JC, et al. Steroid hormone synthesis by the ovarian stroma surrounding epithelial ovarian tumors: a potential mechanism in ovarian tumorigenesis. Mod Pathol. 2017;30:563–76.
Taylor J, McCluggage WG. Ovarian seromucinous carcinoma: report of a series of a newly categorized and uncommon neoplasm. Am J Surg Pathol. 2015;39:983–92.
Wu CH, Mao TL, Vang R, et al. Endocervical-type mucinous borderline tumors are related to endometrioid tumors based on mutation and loss of expression of ARID1A. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2012;31:297–303.
Hauptmann S, Friedrich K, Redline R, Avril S. Ovarian borderline tumors in the 2014 WHO classification: evolving concepts and diagnostic criteria. Virchows Arch. 2017;470:125–42.
Akbarzadeh-Jahromi M, Shekarkhar G, Sari Aslani F, et al. Prevalence of endometriosis in malignant epithelial ovarian tumor. Arch Iran Med. 2015;18:844–8.
Buis CC, van Leeuwen FE, Mooij TM, et al. Increased risk for ovarian cancer and borderline ovarian tumours in subfertile women with endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 2013;28:3358–69.
Pearce CL, Templeman C, Rossing MA, et al. Association between endometriosis and risk of histological subtypes of ovarian cancer: a pooled analysis of case–control studies. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13:385–94.
Liu H, Leng J, Lang J, Cui Q. Clear cell carcinoma arising from abdominal wall endometriosis: a unique case with bladder and lymph node metastasis. World J Surg Oncol. 2014;12:51.
Ferrandina G, Palluzzi E, Fanfani F, et al. Endometriosis-associated clear cell carcinoma arising in caesarean section scar: a case report and review of the literature. World J Surg Oncol. 2016;14:300.
Mederos MA, Villafañe N, Dhingra S, et al. Pancreatic endometrial cyst mimics mucinous cystic neoplasm of the pancreas. World J Gastroenterol. 2017;23:1113.
Klingbeil KD, Azab B, Moller MG. Low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm and endometriosis of the appendix. World J Surg Oncol. 2017;15:226.
Kilzieh R, Rakislova N, Torné A, et al. Endometrial stromal sarcoma arising in colorectal endometriosis. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2017;36:433–7.
Cozzolino M, Nasioudis D, Sisti G, Coccia ME. Malignant transformation of vaginal endometriosis—a review of literature. Gynecol Obstet Investig. 2017;82:105–12.
Hashiguchi M, Kai K, Nishiyama S, et al. Clear cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix presented as a submucosal tumor arising in a background of cervical endometriosis. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2018;37:88–92.
Tarumi Y, Mori T, Kusuki I, et al. Endometrioid adenocarcinoma arising from deep infiltrating endometriosis involving the bladder: a case report and review of the literature. Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2015;13:68.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Science Press & Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Simmen, R.C.M., Quick, C.M., Kelley, A.S., Zheng, W. (2019). Endometriosis and Endometriosis-Associated Tumors. In: Zheng, W., Fadare, O., Quick, C., Shen, D., Guo, D. (eds) Gynecologic and Obstetric Pathology, Volume 2. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3019-3_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3019-3_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-3018-6
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-3019-3
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)