Abstract
This chapter locates the focus of inquiry in the senses, feelings, imaginations, and memories of visitors to memory sites. It discusses how research participants define such places in their own terms, with meanings contextualised by their thoughts and feelings. In doing so, it focuses on what photographs and video make possible in terms of understanding someone else’s experience of a memory site. It argues that the power of such an approach lies in its capacity to bring new knowledge into being that did not exist before, through the visual material created as a result of the encounter between researcher and research participant, and that this material helps carry the experience of the memory site forward into the future as people revisit and consider it.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, B. (2014). Encountering affect: Capacities, apparatuses, conditions. Ashgate: Farnham.
Crouch, D. (2015). Affect, heritage, feeling. In E. Waterton & S. Watson (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of contemporary heritage research (pp. 177–190). London: Palgrave.
Drozdzewski, D., De Nardi, S., & Waterton, E. (2016a). Geographies of memory, place and identity: Intersections in remembering war and conflict. Geography Compass, 10(11), 447–456.
Drozdzewski, D., De Nardi, S., & Waterton, E. (Eds.). (2016b). Memory, place and identity: Commemoration and remembrance of war and conflict. Abingdon: Routledge.
Edensor, T. (2005a). The ghosts of industrial ruins: Ordering and disordering memory in excessive space. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 23, 829–849.
Edensor, T. (2005b). Industrial ruins: Space, aesthetics and materiality. Oxford: Berg.
Fors, V. (2013). Teenagers’ multisensory routes for learning in the museum. The Senses and Society, 8(3), 268–289.
Freeman, L., Nienass, B., & Daniell, R. (2016). Memory, materiality, sensuality. Memory Studies, 9(1), 3–12.
Gillis, J. (1994). Memory and identity: The history of a relationship. In J. Gillis (Ed.), Commemorations: The politics of national identity (pp. 3–24). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Halilovich, H. (2016). Re-imaging and re-imagining the past after ‘memoricide’: Intimate archives as inscribed memories of the missing. Archival Science, 16, 77–92.
Harper, D. (2002). Talking about pictures: A case for photo elicitation. Visual Studies, 17(1), 13–26.
Howes, D. (2014). Introduction to sensory museology. The Senses and Society, 9(3), 259–267.
Jones, O. (2011). Geography, memory and non-representational geographies. Geography Compass, 5(12), 875–885.
Jones, O., & Garde-Hansen, J. (Eds.). (2012). Geography and memory: Explorations in identity, place and becoming. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Lapenta, F. (2011). Some theoretical and methodological view on photo-elicitation. In E. Margolis & L. Pauwels (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of visual research methods (pp. 201–213). London: Sage.
Manning, E. (2016). The minor gesture. Durham: Duke University Press.
Muzaini, H. (2015). On the matter of forgetting and ‘memory returns’. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 40, 102–112.
O’Dell, T., & Willim, R. (2013). Transcription and the senses. The Senses and Society, 8(3), 314–334.
Pink, S. (2013). Engaging the senses in ethnographic practice: Implications and advances. The Senses and Society, 8(3), 261–267.
Pink, S. (2015). Doing sensory ethnography (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
Pink, S. (2017). Technologies, possibilities, emergence and an ethics of responsibility: Refiguring techniques. In E. Gómez-Cruz, S. Sumartojo, & S. Pink (Eds.), Refiguring techniques in digital visual research (pp. 1–11). London: Palgrave Pivot.
Sumartojo, S. (2015). On atmosphere and darkness at Australia’s Anzac day Dawn Service. Visual Communication, 14(2), 267–288.
Sumartojo, S. (2016). Commemorative atmospheres: Memorial sites, collective events and the experience of national identity. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 41(4), 541–553.
Sumartojo, S. (2017). Tweeting from the past: Commemorating the Anzac Centenary @ABCNews1915. Memory Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750698017709873.
Sumartojo, S., & Graves, M. (2018). Rust and dust: Materiality and the feel of memory at Camp des Milles. Journal of Material Culture. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359183518769110.
Sumartojo, S., & Pink, S. (2017). Empathetic visuality: Go-pros and the video trace. In E. Gómez-Cruz, S. Sumartojo, & S. Pink (Eds.), Refiguring techniques in digital-visual research (pp. 39–49). London: Palgrave Pivot.
Turner, J., & Peters, K. (2015). Unlocking the carceral atmospheric: Designing extraordinary encounters at the prison museum. Visual Communication, 14(3), 309–330.
Waterton, E., & Dittmer, J. (2014). The museum as assemblage: Bringing forth affect at the Australian war memorial. Museum Management and Curatorship, 29(2), 122–139.
Witcomb, A. (2013). Understanding the role of affect in producing a critical pedagogy for history museums. Museum Management and Curatorship, 28(3), 255–271.
Acknowledgements
This research underpinning this chapter was supported by a visiting fellowship funded by the Foundation Aix-Marseille University and was conducted in collaboration with Matthew Graves. I also wish to thank all the research participants and the staff at the Camp des Milles, particularly Bernard Mossé, and colleagues Gilles Teulié and Sarah Pink.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sumartojo, S. (2019). Sensory Impact: Memory, Affect and Sensory Ethnography at Official Memory Sites. In: Drozdzewski, D., Birdsall, C. (eds) Doing Memory Research. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1411-7_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1411-7_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-1410-0
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-1411-7
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)