Abstract
This chapter develops around a community mapping methodology and its fieldwork. Community-centred visualisations, growing out of emplaced stories and affects, may be able to channel otherwise elusive imaginaries and the ephemeral mnemonic spaces encountered in fieldwork. For Ricoeur, telling stories can give shape to ephemeral, intangible elements of everyday life. What of the intangible elements of everyday life and storytelling that are remembered collectively and individually, but do not necessarily leave a physical trace? This chapter engages with one such visualisation, a memory-map of the village of Kibblesworth in northeast England, populated with the present and past imaginings of a community of people and of an open-air museum. The museum embodies the imagination of place and of local/non-local memory construction, as it prepares to ‘reassemble’ and exhibit a terrace of prefabricated concrete houses removed from Kibblesworth in the new 1950s town.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
In this project, I take co-researchers to mean a pool of 80 current and past residents of the villages of Kibblesworth and Old Ravensworth in greater Gateshead who donated their time, memories, and expertise to the design and production of Remaking Beamish and who were the primary authors of the community memory mapping side of the project.
- 2.
Here, by academic researchers and curators, I refer to heritage professionals whose professional duties entail paid activities and projects, which community co-researchers usually engage in on an unpaid and voluntary basis.
References
Agnew, J. (1987). Place and politics. Boston: Allen & Unwin.
Anderson, J. (2004). Talking whilst walking: An archaeological geography of knowledge. Area, 36(3), 254–261.
Andrews, G., Kearns, R., Kontos, P., & Wilson, V. (2006). Their finest hour: Older people, oral histories, and the historical geography of social life. Social & Cultural Geography, 7(2), 153–177.
Atkinson, D. (2007). Kitsch geographies and the everyday spaces of social memory. Environment and Planning A, 39, 421–440.
Cappelletto, F. (2003). Long-term memory of extreme events: From autobiography to history. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 9, 241–260.
Crampton, J. (2001). Mapping: A critical introduction to cartography and GIS. Oxford: Blackwell.
Crouch, D. (2015). Affect, heritage, feeling. In E. Waterton & S. Watson (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of contemporary heritage research (pp. 177–190). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
De Nardi, S. (2014). Senses of place, senses of the past: Making experiential maps as part of community heritage fieldwork. Journal of Community Archaeology and Heritage, 1(1), 5–23.
De Nardi, S. (2016). The poetics of conflict experience: Materiality and embodiment in second world war Italy. London: Routledge.
De Nardi, S. (2019). Visualising place, memory and the imagined. London: Routledge.
DeLyser, D. (1999). Authenticity on the ground: Engaging the past in a California ghost town. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 89(4), 602–632.
Dicks, B. (2010). Heritage, place and community. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.
Drozdzewski, D. (2015). Retrospective reflexivity: The residual and subliminal repercussions of researching war. Emotion, Space and Society, 17, 30.
Duffy, P. (2014). Grassroots archaeology: An experiment in monument resurrection and suburban identity in North Dublin. Journal of Community Archaeology & Heritage, 1(3), 193–209.
Harley, B. (1989). Deconstructing the map. Cartographica, 26(2), 1–20.
Kavanagh, G. (2000). Dream spaces. Memory and the museum. London: Leicester University Press.
Keith, M. (1992). Angry writing: (Re)presenting the unethical world of the ethnographer. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 10, 551–568.
Kesby, M. (2007). Spatialising participatory approaches: The contribution of geography to a mature debate. Environment and Planning A, 39, 2813–2831.
Lowenthal, D. (1985). The past is a foreign country. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Macdonald, S. (1997). A people’s story: Heritage, identity and authority. In C. Rojek & J. Urry (Eds.), Touring cultures: Transformations of travel and theory (pp. 155–175). London: Routledge.
MacKian, S. (2004). Mapping reflexive communities: Visualising the geographies of emotion. Social and Cultural Geography, 5(4), 615–631.
Margalit, A. (2002). The ethics of memory. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
Muzaini, H. (2015). On the matter of forgetting and “memory returns”. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 40, 102–112.
Pearce, S. (1992). Museums, objects, and collections: A cultural study. Leicester: Leicester University-Press.
Pink, S. (2009). Doing sensory ethnography. London: Sage.
Pink, S. (2013). Engaging the senses in ethnographic practice: Implications and advances. The Senses and Society, 8(3), 261–267.
Rednile Projects. http://www.rednile.org/public-realm/insider-art-kibblesworth/. Accessed 1 Mar 2018.
Ricoeur, P. (1991). In M. J. Valdés (Ed.), A Ricoeur reader. Reflection and imagination. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Riley, M., & Harvey, D. (2005). Landscape archaeology, heritage and the community in Devon: An oral history approach. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 11(4), 269–288.
Rizvi, U. Z. (2006). Accounting for multiple desires: Decolonizing methodologies, archaeology, and the public interest. India Review, 5(3), 394–416.
Rouverol, A. J. (1999). “I was content and not content”: Oral history and the collaborative process. Oral History, 28(2), 66–78.
Sather-Wagstaff, J. (2017). Making polysense of the world: Affect, memory, heritage. In D. Tolia-Kelly, E. Waterton, & S. Watson (Eds.), Heritage, affect and emotion: Politics, practices and infrastructures (pp. 12–30). London: Routledge.
Schama, S. (2005). Landscape and memory. London: Harper Collins.
Sin, C. H. (2003). Interviewing in ‘place’: The socio-spatial construction of interview data. Area, 35, 305–312.
Smith, L. (2006). Uses of heritage. London: Routledge.
Tuan, Y. (1974). Topophilia. A study of environmental perception. New York: Columbia University Press.
Wainwright, M. (2012, May 7). Gateshead prefabs become part of history, online at https://www.theguardian.com/uk/the-northerner/2012/may/07/housing-heritage-prefabs-airey-gateshead In The Guardian. Accessed 28 Feb 2018.
Waterton, E. (2005). Whose sense of place? Reconciling archaeological perspectives with community values: Cultural landscapes in England. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 11(4), 309–326.
Waterton, E. (2014). A more-than-representational understanding of heritage: The ‘past’ and the politics of affect. Geography Compass, 8(11), 823–833.
Watson, S., & Waterton, E. (2010). Reading the visual: Representation and narrative in the construction of heritage. Material Culture Review, 71, 84–97.
Witcomb, A. (2013). Understanding the role of affect in producing a critical pedagogy for history museums. Museum Management and Curatorship, 28(3), 255–271.
Wood, D. (1992). The power of maps. New York: the Guilford Press.
Wylie, J. (2002). An essay on ascending Glastonbury Tor. Geoforum, 33, 441–454.
Zerubavel, E. (2003). Time maps: Collective memory and the social shape of the past. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
De Nardi, S. (2019). Community Memory Mapping as a Visual Ethnography of Post-War Northeast England. In: Drozdzewski, D., Birdsall, C. (eds) Doing Memory Research. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1411-7_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1411-7_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-1410-0
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-1411-7
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)