Abstract
One of the most disfiguring diseases is lymphatic filariasis (LF) which is a major public health problem in tropical world. The disease is caused majorly by Wuchereria bancrofti and to smaller extent by Brugia malayi and B. timori. It is transmitted by mosquito vectors belonging to genera Culex, Anopheles, Aedes, and/or Mansonia. Currently, LF is targeted for elimination with mass drug administration of a combination of diethylcarbamazine/ivermectin and albendazole as a tool. Several rounds of MDA have already been administered in endemic communities, and questions have arisen pertaining to the continuance of parasite prevalence in some areas despite repeated rounds of MDA. This could be due to variations in the parasite strains that may not be responding to the anti-filarial drug administered. These variations could be the result of various factors such as geographic isolation, infra-population or refugia, environmental factors, and drug pressure. The long-term administration of the drug in the elimination program itself might have led to this phenomenon, or wide geographic distribution spanning continents might have affected variation. Investigating genetic variations among these variants may reveal the differential response to the anti-filarial drugs, and such studies are important for devising the drug administration strategies. In summary, there is a need to understand the genetic variation among the parasite populations in different LF endemic areas for which there is a need to develop appropriate markers. This review discusses the biological, physiological, and genetic variations among LF parasites.
Access provided by CONRICYT-eBooks. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Filarial Parasites
- Human Lymphatic Filarial Parasite
- Bancrofti
- Parasite Population
- Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD)
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
8.1 Introduction
Lymphatic filariasis (LF) is considered as a neglected tropical disease caused by mosquito-borne nematode parasites, viz., Wuchereria bancrofti, Brugia malayi, and B. timori (Routh and Bhowmik 1994). It affects around 120 million people in over 73 countries (WHO, 2014), and W. bancrofti is responsible for ~90% cases of LF (WHO 1992, 2002). The infection and disease caused by these worms are commonly termed as bancroftian filariasis, brugian filariasis, and timorian filariasis, respectively. The parasites are transmitted among humans by the bites of female mosquitoes belonging to genera Culex, Anopheles, Aedes, and/or Mansonia (Table 8.1). These mosquitoes act as vectors of specific filarial parasites by developing their larval stages and carrying the infective stage to human hosts (Manson-Bahr and Bell 1995; Simonsen 2003).
Filariasis is widely distributed in the tropical and subtropical regions of Africa, Asia, Northern South America, Western Pacific, and Eastern Mediterranean region. Approximately 70% of infections occur in India, Nigeria, Bangladesh, and Indonesia, and more than 1 billion people worldwide are at risk of acquiring LF infection (Molyneux and Zagaria 2002). Of these, 95% are infected with W. bancrofti and the remainder with B. malayi and B. timori (WHO 1995). A population of 44 million is affected with various clinical forms of the disease, while 76 million carry the parasites with silent clinical damages of lymphatics and renal systems (Ottesen et al. 1997; Melrose 2002; Remme et al. 2002; Hotez et al. 2006). Reports until the year 2006 showed that an estimated 1.254 billion people in 83 endemic countries and territories are at the risk of infection of LF. The WHO Southeast Asian region has the highest proportion of cases (64%), followed by the African region (32%). The European region remains free from LF (WHO 2007, 2014, http://www.who.int/wer).
In India, data available until the year 2000 showed that up to 27.09 million microfilaremic and 20.83 million symptomatic filariasis cases existed, and about 429.32 million individuals were at the risk of infection (Sabesan et al. 2000). India alone accounts for 40% of the global burden of LF (Michael and Bundy 1997), and at least one-third of the people affected with the disease live in India. Bancroftian filariasis caused by W. bancrofti accounts for about 98% of the national burden, and brugian filariasis by B. Malayi is responsible for the remaining 2% which is distributed mainly in Odisha and Kerala. The recent report showed that an estimated 554.2 million people are at risk of LF infection in India (WHO 2007).
The clinical and immunological outcomes of infection and disease vary from individuals living in different endemic regions due to genetic polymorphisms, environmental factors, or inherent innate immunity (Tisch et al. 2001; Hise et al. 2003; Choi et al. 2001). The clustering of filarial infection within the household (Ottesen et al. 1981) showed the evidence of genetic polymorphism in different outcomes of the disease.
8.2 Strains Based on Periodicity of Microfilariae
Filarial parasites, both W. bancrofti and B. malayi, occur as different physiological strains in different geographical regions of the world (Sasa 1974). In most areas (Asia, Africa, Malaysia, the Philippines, Papua New Guinea), the periodicity of W. bancrofti is nocturnal, i.e., presence of microfilariae (mf) in peripheral circulation during night time (Sasa and Tanaka 1974; Shriram et al. 2002; Pichon and Treuil 2004; Bockarie et al. 2009). In some areas it is diurnally sub-periodic (South Pacific, Andaman & Nicobar Islands) or nocturnally sub-periodic (Thailand), where mf are present continuously in the peripheral blood, where the concentrations are higher than the average during the day and midnight, respectively (Kalra 1974; Pothikasikorn et al. 2008). It is governed by a biological rhythm inherent in the mf of a particular strain but is influenced by the circadian rhythm of the specific mammalian host. Also, the periodicity is in agreement with the feeding behavior of the vector mosquito (Weerasooriya et al. 1998) enabling them to ingest the mf in large numbers by presenting themselves in high density in the peripheral blood during the biting period of the mosquito.
8.3 Diagnosis and Genotyping of the Disease
Filariasis can be diagnosed by detection of mf through microscopic examination of blood smear or membrane filtration of the blood, taken during the time of circulation of mf depending upon its periodicity. However, the method of diagnosis based on finger prick thick blood smear test for mf has low sensitivity and is costly and not well accepted by either community or program personnel (Weil et al. 1997; Das et al. 2005). As an alternative and, more importantly, as a replacement for the night blood collection, more rapid immunological tests such as monoclonal antibody (Og4C3)-based ELISA or immuno-chromatographic test (ICT) are in use. In an attempt to detect antigens in day blood samples collected on filter paper, through Og4C3 test, Itoh et al. (1998) could get high sensitivity and specificity in the immune reaction. The ICT test kit (Weil and Ramzy 2007), though costly, is claimed to be specific and sensitive and could provide on-the-spot results (Weil et al. 1997; Pani et al. 2000). Detection of IgG4 antibodies using recombinant antigen also has been proved sensitive for the detection of filarial infection (Rahmah et al. 2003; Supali et al. 2004; Weil et al. 2011; Athisaya Mary et al. 2011). Apart from these, molecular tests based on DNA (PCR, PCR-RFLP, RT-PCR, and DNA sequencing) are also in place for detection of active infection both in human and mosquito vectors (Abbasi et al. 1996; Williams et al. 1996; Hoti et al. 2008; Vasuki et al. 2003, 2012). Molecular tests for diagnosis and species differentiation were mainly targeted HhaI repeat (McReynolds et al. 1986; Rao et al. 2006; Triteeraprapab et al. 2001), SspI repeat (Fischer et al. 1999; McCarthy et al. 1996; Williams et al. 1996; Zhong et al. 1996), glutathione peroxidase, cytochrome oxidase I and internal transcribed spacer-1 (Fischer et al. 2002; Nuchprayoon et al. 2005; Thanomsub et al. 2000), cofactor-independent phosphoglycerate mutase isoform-1, and abundant larval transcript-2 genes (Fong et al. 2013; Sakthidevi et al. 2010; Dhamodharan et al. 2012).
8.4 Treatment and Drug Resistance
Currently, diethylcarbamazine (DEC) or combination with ivermectin (IVM) and albendazole (ALB) is used to target the mf, to reduce or interrupt transmission, and these drugs have low macrofilaricidal activity (Ottesen et al. 1997; Ottesen et al. 1999; Plaisier et al. 2000; Meyrowitsch et al. 2004). Interruption of transmission is expected to be achieved by mass annual drug administration (MDA) of DEC to entire communities at risk of infection when community drug consumption rates are adequate. Recently, treatment with doxycycline to kill the symbiotic bacterium of filarial parasite has also drawn attention of many workers (Hoerauf et al. 1999, 2008; Smith and Rajan 2000; Casiraghi et al. 2002; Rao 2005; Taylor et al. 2005). An earlier trial of doxycycline against Wolbachia of W. bancrofti has shown complete clearance of mf and significant level of reduction in adult worm activity (Taylor et al. 2005). In India, recently the National Task Force for Elimination of Lymphatic Filariasis (NTF-ELF) decided to modify its existing strategy of MDA using DEC alone to DEC + albendazole co-administration based on the recommendation of the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR). MDA with DEC or its combination with other microfilaricides has its own limitation as there are instances of recurrences of microfilaremia, possibly due to reproduction from surviving female adult worms (Fernando et al. 2011). There is also a possibility of resurgence of infection and the emergence of drug-resistant strains after MDA due to the strong selective pressure on parasites (Grant 1994; Anderson and Jaenike 1997; Schwab et al. 2007). Though it was not possible to assess resistance to DEC, resistance to IVM has been reported in animal filarial parasites as well as in the human filarial parasite, Onchocerca volvulus (Prichard 1990; Awadzi et al. 2004). Resistance to ALB has been seen in many parasitic nematodes of animals, and many workers demonstrated the possibility of ALB resistance in W. bancrofti too due to phenylalanine to tyrosine mutation at 200th and 167th positions, responsible for resistance existing in W. bancrofti, and also developed allele-specific PCR assays (Prichard 2007; Schwab et al. 2005, 2007; Hoti et al. 2009) for screening resistance alleles in treated parasite populations.
8.5 Molecular Biology and Genomics of Filariasis/Genetic Variation
The development of molecular methods and techniques has led to the advancement in isolation, purification, and characterization of nucleic acids and proteins from filarial parasites. Many structural and functional genes from the genome of B. malayi and W. bancrofti and their endosymbiont, Wolbachia, have been characterized and used for phylogenetic analysis (Williams et al. 2000). The entire mitochondrial genome of B. malayi (13.67 Kb) and W. bancrofti (13.63 Kb) (Ghedin et al. 2007; McNulty et al. 2012) and endosymbiont genome of Wolbachia from B. malayi (~1 Mb) and W. bancrofti (~1 Mb) (Foster et al. 2005; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/11274?project_id=199733) have also been characterized. The draft genome of B. malayi (93.65 Mb) (Ghedin et al. 2007) and whole genome short gun sequences of W. bancrofti (81.5 Mb) (McNulty et al. 2012, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Traces/wgs/?val=ADBV01#contigs) have been released into the public domain. The sequence data for the genomes of major human filarial pathogens, W. bancrofti, O. volvulus, and Loa loa, have been made publically available (http://www.broadinstitute.org/annotation/genome/filarial_worms/MultiHome.html). The genome annotation and analysis are essential for the determination of the complete sequence of the chromosomal genome, identification of the coding genes, prediction of function of structural/functional genes, and investigation of genetic variation in the genome, population structure, and gene polymorphism in relation to drug resistance and other selective forces. Genomics of filariasis is mainly focused on identifying new drug/vaccine targets, diagnostic development and biological basis of drug resistance, antigenic diversity, infectivity and pathology, and gene polymorphism (Unnasch and Williams 2000; Blaxter et al. 1999).
8.6 Wolbachia Endosymbiont of Filarial Parasites
Wolbachia pipientis is a bacterial endosymbiont, maternally transmitted and associated with arthropods and filarial nematodes (Werren 1997). Most of the filarial parasites, including human parasites such as W. bancrofti, B. malayi, and O. volvulus, are infected with the intracellular Wolbachia (Sironi et al. 1995; Bandi et al. 1998; Taylor et al. 2000). The genus Wolbachia of filarial nematode and arthropods was identified based on DNA sequence data (Henkle-Duhrsen et al. 1998). Wolbachia plays an important role in the biology of the host and in the immunopathology of filariasis (Brattig et al. 2000; Taylor 2002; Keiser et al. 2002). The phylogenetic analysis of Wolbachia endosymbiont of the lymphatic filarial parasite showed that their phylogeny agrees with the phylogenetic structure of their host-parasite such as B. malayi, W. bancrofti, O. volvulus, etc., which indicates that they have evolutionary significance on parasite-endosymbiont association (Taylor et al. 1999; Casiraghi et al. 2004, 2005; Foster et al. 2005; Ferri et al. 2011; Sharma et al. 2013). Many genes of Wolbachia of human lymphatic filarial parasite have been characterized to focus on Wolbachia-based control strategies of filariasis (Brattig et al. 2000; Hoerauf et al. 2000; Taylor 2000; Dhamodharan et al. 2011; Sharma et al. 2013; Slatko et al. 2014; Shahab et al. 2014).
8.7 The Nuclear Genome
The draft genome size of B. malayi is 100 Mb and encodes about ~20,000 genes (Ghedin et al. 2004; Parra et al. 2007; Scott et al. 2013). It consists of five pairs of chromosomes (four autosomal pairs and one sex determination pair), and the genome is rich in adenosine and thymidine (75% AT). Brugia genome consists of a single 322 bp repetitive sequence, the HhaI repeat which occupies 10–12% of the genome. This HhaI repeat is genus-specific and exists in around 30,000 copies per haploid chromosome set, organized in tandem arrays (Mcreynolds et al. 1986). The draft genome of W. bancrofti (81.5 Mb) (McNulty et al. 2012) is yet to be annotated (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/?term=SRP000772).
8.8 Mitochondrial Genome Diversity
The complete genome of B. malayi mitochondria was characterized by Ghedin et al. (2007). Recently, the complete mitochondrial genome of W. bancrofti was sequenced (McNulty et al. 2012), and the genetic variation among the mitochondrial genome of three W. bancrofti strains from India, West Africa, and Papua New Guinea is analyzed (Ramesh et al. 2012). The Mt. genomes of nematodes are usually smaller than other metazoans, and the size varies from ~13.6 to 26 kb. Most of the nematode Mt. genomes contain 12 protein-coding genes, 22 trn genes, and 2 rrn genes, and they usually lack an atp8 gene. The arrangements of nematode Mt. genes are more variable and AT-rich (Okimoto et al. 1992; Keddie et al. 1998; Lavrov and Brown 2001). High mutation rate and maternal inheritance make mitochondrial genome a good source of molecular marker for studying population genetic structure (Avise et al. 1994; Wallace 1999). Cytochrome oxidase subunit 1 (COI) has been used as a taxonomic and population genetic marker to analyze the genetic diversity of W. bancrofti strains (de Souza et al. 2014).
8.9 Genetic Variation and Molecular Markers in LF
8.9.1 Genetic Diversity of Human Lymphatic Filarial Parasites
Nematode parasite populations are genetically heterogeneous (Nadler 1987, 1990), and genetic variation in parasitic nematodes is a prerequisite for a genetic response to a selection pressure. Proper identification of genetic variation in parasitic nematodes is essential to understand the genetic structure (e.g., effective population size, heterozygosity) or as epidemiological markers. Molecular methods have proven to be useful for assessing both inter- and intra-genetic variation in parasite populations (Nadler 1990; Grant 1994; Gasser and Newton 2000).
The analysis of genetic diversity and heterogeneity of filarial parasites is essential for understanding the phylogeny, the evolutionary history, and the emergence of drug-resistant phenotypes after treatment with antifilarial drugs (Hoti et al. 2008; Dhamodharan et al. 2008; Hoti et al. 2003. The presence of polymorphism in parasites can be identified from biological (e.g., morphology, infectivity, and periodicity), biochemical (e.g., enzymatic and drug sensitive/resistance), immunological (e.g., difference in immune response due to antigenic/antibody diversity), or molecular biological (e.g., variation in DNA and proteins sequence that leads to functional differences) characteristics. Genetic diversity of parasitic nematodes has been studied by analyzing the variability using molecular markers such as isozymes, mitochondrial DNA (mt DNA), random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD), restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP), amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP), microsatellites, and internal transcribed spacers (ITS) of ribosomal DNA. All these markers have been used in different combination to characterize the genetic diversity of nematodes.
8.9.2 Morphological and Behavioral Variations in Filarial Parasites
Almost all the developmental stages of the filarial parasites show differences in morphological features, with which they can be differentiated up to the species level. Since W. bancrofti and B. malayi coexist in many places (Raina et al. 1990; Rajendran et al. 1997), their identification to species level is very important in diagnosis as well as epidemiological surveys. The size of adult W. bancrofti worm is larger than the adult B. malayi. Adult male worms of B. malayi also show morphological variation due to their posterior cuticular structure (Maizels and Kurniawan-Atmadja 2002). Apart from differences in body size, cephalic space, and distance from head to nerve ring, the mf of B. malayi and W. bancrofti can be distinguished, very clearly, by the presence of caudal nuclei at the tip of the tail of the former which is not seen in the latter. The infective L3 stage of these species can be differentiated by examining their caudal papillae. There are three caudal papillae, two lateral and one terminal. All the three caudal papillae are distinctly protruding in W. bancrofti as compared to B. malayi. The lateral papillae of B. malayi, under electron microscopy, show a gutter-like indentation around their bases, and this character is absent in W. bancrofti (Zaman and Narayanan 1986).
Behavioral variations occur between these two species, in terms of mf periodicity and localization of the adult worms in the mammalian hosts. Microfilaria periodicity, which has been discussed in an earlier section, leads to strain variations, which ultimately decide the vector adaptation (Thorpe 1896; Basu 1958; Kalra 1974; Russel et al. 1975). Regarding adult worm localization, W. bancrofti adults are most commonly localized both in the lymphatics of limbs and the intrascrotal lymphatic vessels as against B. malayi worms, which are found mostly localized in the lymphatic system of limbs (Dreyer et al. 2006; Partono, 1987).
8.9.3 Biochemical Variations
Biochemical properties, structures, and roles of parasite proteins/proteases vary due to variation in amino acid sequence. Identification of biochemical variation is essential for the development of suitable diagnostic markers and vaccine and drug targets for the control of parasitic diseases. Though isoenzymes (or allozymes) are the essential biochemical markers and have been used for analyzing genetic variation in Ascaris, Anisakis simplex, and many nematodes (Leslie et al. 1982; Anderson et al. 1998), till now no such studies are reported for lymphatic filarial parasites, probably due to the scarcity of parasite materials. However, there are strong indications of interspecific as well as stage-wise intraspecific biochemical variations in filarial parasites (Maizels and Kurniawan-Atmadja 2002). Protein variations among species could be the reason for the enhancement of specificity of certain diagnostic filarial antigens such as Bm-SXP-1 and Wb-SXP-1, when the same species molecules are used (Rao et al. 2000; Pandiaraja et al. 2010).
8.9.4 Immunological Variations
Antigenic diversity and polymorphism in parasite populations are evolutionary strategies to escape from the host immune response (Maizels 2009). Filarial parasite antigenic surface binding to human antibody varies (Ravindran et al. 1994; Maizels and Kurniawan-Atmadja 2002), and this variation has direct effect on the recognition of immune system, immunity, and parasite immune evasion mechanisms because the survival of parasite is associated with the immune response stimulated in the host (Piessens et al. 1980). The outcome of in vitro analysis with sera samples collected from mf carriers also showed that mf could express a variety of surface antigens (Ravindran et al. 1994). The variations in mf sheath proteins (SHPs) which are composed of the tightly cross-linked set of repeat-rich proteins, with some carbohydrate structures, were reported (Hirzmann et al. 1995; Zahner et al. 1995). And variants of SHP-1, SHP-2, and SHP-3 are the key proteins identified, but the level of host immune response due to these variations is yet to be reported. Many studies have already reported the diversity of genes coding for immune immunogenic proteins in filarial parasites (Choi et al. 2001; Hise et al. 2003; Jaoko et al. 2007; Hoti et al. 2007).
8.9.5 Molecular Variations
Analysis of polymorphism in coding sequences of structural and functional genes, regulatory elements (promoter and enhancer sequences), RNA elements, and introns of protein-coding genes have received more attention because of their potential in treatment and diagnosis. DNA sequence-based assays have become easier to use and more efficient at screening for nucleotide sequence-based polymorphisms. Polymorphism in abundant larval transcript-2, cysteine protease inhibitor-2, and sheath proteins (SHPs) has been reported from filarial parasites B. malayi and W. bancrofti (Gregory et al. 1997; Gomez-Escobar et al. 2002; Maizels and Kurniawan-Atmadja 2002). Molecular variations of filarial antigens have also been reported from B. malayi cDNA clones sequenced under Filarial Genome Project (Maizels et al. 2001). Hoti et al. (2007) have studied polymorphism of lipid binding/transport molecules (gp15/400 allergen gene) of W. bancrofti from different regions of India and found that the parasite populations from different geographical locations, viz., Thanjavur and Tiruvannamalai (two districts in Tamil Nadu), are heterogeneous with three to five genotypes, and influence of drug pressure is associated with the gene diversity of the populations studied.
8.9.6 Molecular Markers/Methods for Analyzing Genetic Variation of Filarial Parasites
Currently, only a few molecular markers are available for filarial parasitic nematodes, which include RAPD, AFLP, RFLP, and rDNA. Molecular markers serve as effective tools for analyzing inter- and intraspecific genetic variations and phylogenetic relationships (Williams et al. 1990; Cameron et al. 1988; Patra et al. 2007; Thangadurai et al. 2006; Dhamodharan et al. 2008; McNulty et al. 2013; Small et al. 2014).
8.9.6.1 Random Amplification of Polymorphic DNA (RAPD)
Random amplification of polymorphic DNA (RAPD) is an effective marker to differentiate the parasite species, as well as to determine the gene polymorphism within the genus. Nucleic acid sequence variation due to point mutations, inversions, deletions, and additions will determine the number and size of the RAPD bands. This technique is very rapid and simple and does not depend on previous knowledge of the target DNA sequences. It is mainly used for phylogenetic inference among closely related species through distance and parsimony analyses (Morgan et al. 1993; Sire et al. 2001).
Several studies have reported the use of the RAPD markers in analyzing the genetic diversity of W. bancrofti populations. The analysis of genetic polymorphism by RAPD markers in few studies with the selective population (from LF endemic areas) from India has revealed different levels of inter- and intra-genetic diversity of W. bancrofti populations (Pradeep Kumar et al. 2002; Patra et al. 2007). Thangadurai et al. (2006) used RAPD marker for inferring phylogeography of W. bancrofti in India and found it to be complex with high genetic divergence and varying gene flow between populations. Genetic heterogeneity of W. bancrofti populations at spatially hierarchical levels in south India (Hoti et al. 2008) showed the high degree of variability associated with human populations. Phylogenetic analysis of W. bancrofti microfilariae isolated from dry blood smears collected from microfilaria carriers residing in villages under MDA and selective chemotherapy with DEC was also analyzed using RAPD markers (Bisht et al. 2006). Dhamodharan et al. (2011) attempted to elucidate the influence of anti-filarial chemotherapy strategies on the genetic structure of W. bancrofti populations using RAPD marker-based population genetic analysis. Also, these investigators have used RAPD marker for differentiating periodic and sub-periodic W. bancrofti (Das et al. 2011). Analysis of genetic diversity of diurnally sub-periodic W. bancrofti in the Andaman and Nicobar Islands using RAPD marker showed that the parasites transmitted by Cx. quinquefasciatus and Ochlerotatus (Aedes) niveus from Car Nicobar Island and from neighboring islands, respectively, are phylogenetically distinct (Dhamodharan et al. 2008). Nuchprayoon et al. (2007) developed RAPD assay to differentiate a nocturnally sub-periodic Thai strain from nocturnally periodic Myanmar strains of W. bancrofti.
8.9.6.2 Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism (RFLP)
Restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) is used both as diagnostic and phylogenetic marker (Gasser et al. 1996; Thanomsub et al. 2000; Nuchprayoon et al. 2003a, b) in nematode parasites. It is achieved by digesting either the genomic DNA directly or PCR amplified fragments (PCR-RFLP) with a suitable restriction enzyme followed by generating RFLP profile using gel electrophoresis (Nuchprayoon 2009). Bhandari et al. (2005) used RFLP of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region of the ribosomal RNA to study the intraspecific variation in W. bancrofti isolates collected from different endemic zones but found that they were genetically highly similar. Nuchprayoon et al. (2005) used PCR-RFLP for the digestion of the ITS1 product with the restriction endonuclease Ase I, and based on the genetic diversity, they differentiated species-level identification of filarial parasites such as W. bancrofti, B. malayi, B. pahangi, Dirofilaria immitis, and D. repens.
8.9.6.3 Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism (AFLP)
Amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) is a powerful molecular marker, and this technique also doesn’t require prior sequence data. It is a combination of RFLP and RAPDs, and the basic methodology includes digestion of genomic DNA using two different restriction enzymes (a rare and a frequent cutter), ligation of adapters to the digested fragments, and PCR amplification with primers homologous to the adapters plus one to four additional random bases at its 3′ end. The subset of digested DNA fragments amplified will give distinct bands that can be analyzed on a polyacrylamide gel. Patra et al. (2007) have identified suitable AFLP marker for genotyping filarial parasite, W. bancrofti, collected from India.
8.9.6.4 Microsatellite Markers
The hypervariable repeat length of microsatellites is used to study DNA polymorphisms among related organisms (Makova et al. 2000). Microsatellite markers are ideal for studying genetic diversity (Rosenthal et al. 2002) because it is highly polymorphic, selectively neutral, distributed throughout the genome, reproducible, and expressed co-dominantly. Microsatellites have been characterized in animal parasitic nematodes such as Strongyloides ratti, Trichinella spiralis, and Haemonchus contortus (Zarlenga et al. 1996; Fisher and Viney 1996; Hoekstra et al. 1997), in potato cyst nematode Globodera spp. (Thiery and Mugniery 2000), and in B. malayi (Tautz 1989). Underwood et al. (2000) have studied microsatellite-based polymorphism among B. malayi isolates from Indonesia and Malaysia. Currently, no existing report on microsatellite markers for W. bancrofti is available and is yet to be studied/developed.
8.9.6.5 Genetic Markers Based on DNA Sequencing
Mitochondrial markers are more suitable for investigating the population genetics of nematodes in inter- and intra-genetic variations, differentiating sibling species, because they are maternally inherited and have higher substitution rates than nuclear genes (Anderson et al. 1998). Many studies were reported already on the phylogenetic analysis of nematode populations based on mtDNA markers (Tarrant et al. 1992). Ribosomal DNA (rDNA) markers have also been used extensively for studying genetic variation within and between species of nematodes (Dame et al. 1991; Nadler 1992). Internal transcribed spacers (ITS) of rDNA as genetic markers for phylogenetic and phylogeographical identification of nematode species, including filarial parasites, have been reported recently (Zhu and Gasser 1998). Ribosomal RNA (rRNA) such as 16S rRNA (for Wolbachia) and 18 s rRNA (for nematode) have also proven to be used as molecular marker for species identification and phylogenetic analysis (Gogarten et al. 1996; Jain et al. 1999). Recently Bhandari et al. (2005) studied the polymorphism of the 18S rRNA gene in W. bancrofti parasites collected from three different zones in India which showed that these parasites were genetically similar. Fong et al. (2013) phylogenetically differentiated the B. malayi isolated from Northeast Borneo Island and Thailand using ITS1 nucleotide sequences (Fong et al. 2013).
The polymorphism of gp15/400 of W. bancrofti, a polyprotein allergen (NPA), was investigated through sequencing a single repeat subunit of this 10-mer gene from 35 isolates of W. bancrofti collected from different geographic locations of India (Hoti et al. 2007). The repeat subunit was found to be highly conserved in all the isolates with only two nucleotide changes at positions 285 (A-G) and 336 (C-T), which are synonymous. This gene is multifunction in nature ranging from lipid binding and transportation to elicitation of elevated levels of IgE and Th2 type of immune response in the infected host. It is also reported to be involved in the transportation of arachidonic acid and metabolites, which are known to be the mode of action of anti-filarial drug, diethylcarbamazine. It is a good target for the development of anti-filarial drugs and immunomodulation and immunochemotherapy.
8.10 Phylogeny of Filarial Parasites
The phylum Nematoda has a large number of parasitic groups, and all the filarial parasites belonging to this phylum were grouped under the family Onchocercidae and the subfamily Onchocercinae. Molecular phylogenetic analysis using rDNA and mtDNA showed that the human lymphatic filarial parasite, W. bancrofti, is more closely related to B. malayi than B. pahangi, the animal filarial parasite, and O. volvulus, the human cutaneous filarial parasite (Casiraghi et al. 2001). Phylogenetic tree constructed recently by aligning complete mtDNA of nematodes available from online databases also clearly indicates this phylogenetic position of filarial parasites.
In a recent study, the existence of parallelism between the evolution of the polyprotein genes and small subunit (SSU) rDNA genes of parasitic nematodes has been observed. This was also evidenced by the phylogenetic tree constructed using the nucleotide sequence of the polyprotein gene of mammalian parasitic nematodes. Recently mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase 1 sequence-based population genetics of the W. bancrofti in Papua New Guinea with respect to posttreatment (Small et al. 2013) showed that parasite diversity was similar among people residing within the same village and clustered within transmission zones.
8.11 Phylogeography of W. bancrofti
Genetic analysis of W. bancrofti populations collected from 71 mf carriers from different geoclimatic regions of India through RAPD profiles showed that the parasite populations are comprised of at least five genotypes (Thangadurai et al. 2006). Generally, parasite populations from urban areas are genetically heterogeneous exhibiting two to four different genotypes, possibly due to the convergence of infected individuals from different areas for trade and employment and consequent intermixing of parasite populations (Hoti et al. 2008). In their study, analysis of parasite populations collected from 31 mf carriers residing in Pondicherry and surrounding villages showed that W. bancrofti populations of rural area are highly homogenous comprising one or two genotypes, compared to the urban populations, which showed high genetic divergence and varying levels of gene flow between populations of different areas. The diversity of parasites in relation to different age groups has also been investigated, and the results showed that the parasite heterogeneity increases with age of the carrier, possibly due to acquiring of new infections at different time points in life (Hoti et al. 2008).
All these studies on the phylogeography of W. bancrofti populations in India have been indicative of the following:
-
a.
High genetic divergence and gene flow between populations.
-
b.
The route of entry of the parasite into Indian subcontinent possibly appeared to be from an ancient origin from the countries of the Southeast Asian archipelago, through the eastern coastal line of the southern peninsula.
-
c.
The Western Ghats would have played a major role in the selection process by geographic isolation leading to the genetic drift between the two strains on its western and eastern side. Also, the chemotherapeutical pressure would have contributed to the high genetic heterogeneity of the populations in the eastern side of the country (Thangadurai et al. 2006).
8.12 Conclusion
Parasite populations respond to selective pressures like drug pressure and are genetically heterogeneous. Understanding the genetic variability and diversity of genes and genome within and between populations of the filarial parasite is essential for appropriate treatment schedules and designing control programs. Currently, molecular markers have been successfully used in analyzing the population genetic structure of filarial parasites in India on a limited scale. Such efforts need to be undertaken on national and further on a global scale.
References
Abbasi I, Hamburger J, Githure J, Ochola JJ, Agure R, Koech DK, Ramzy R, Gad A, Williams SA (1996) Detection of Wuchereria bancrofti DNA in patients’ sputum by the polymerase chain reaction. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 90:531–532
Anderson TJ, Jaenike J (1997) Host specificity, evolutionary relationships and macrogeographic differentiation among Ascaris populations from humans and pigs. Parasitology 115(Pt 3):325–342
Anderson TJ, Blouin MS, Beech RN (1998) Population biology of parasitic nematodes: applications of genetic markers. Adv Parasitol 41:219–283
Athisaya Mary K, Hoti SL, Krishnamoorthy K, Das PK, Rahmah N (2011) Detection of filarial specific IgG4 antibodies in individuals residing in endemic areas using panLFRAPID test card. J Parasit Dis 35:77–79
Avise JC, Nelson WS, Sibley CG (1994) DNA sequence support for a close phylogenetic relationship between some storks and new world vultures. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91(11):5173–5177
Awadzi K, Boakye DA, Edwards G, Opoku NO, Attah SK, Osei-Atweneboana MY, Lazdins-Helds JK, Ardrey AE, Addy ET et al (2004) An investigation of persistent microfilaridermias despite multiple treatments with ivermectin, in two onchocerciasis-endemic foci in Ghana. Ann Trop Med Parasitol 98:231–249
Bandi C, Anderson TJ, Genchi C, Blaxter ML (1998) Phylogeny of Wolbachia in filarial nematodes. Proc Biol Sci 265(1413):2407–2413
Basu PC (1958) A note on malaria and filariasis in Andaman and Nicobar. Bull Nat Soc India Mal Mosq Dis 6:193
Bhandari Y, Dabir P, Nandhakumar K, Dayananda KM, Shouche YS, Reddy MV (2005) Analysis of polymorphism of 18S rRNA gene in Wuchereria bancrofti microfilariae. Microbiol Immunol 49(10):909–914
Bisht R, Hoti SL, Thangadurai R, Das PK (2006) Isolation of Wuchereria bancrofti microfilariae from archived stained blood slides for use in genetic studies and amplification of parasite and endosymbiont genes. Acta Trop 99(1):1–5
Blaxter M, Aslett M, Guiliano D, Daub J (1999) Parasitic helminth genomics. Filarial Genome Project. Parasitology 118(Suppl):S39–S51
Bockarie MJ, Pedersen EM, White GB, Michael E (2009) Role of vector control in the global program to eliminate lymphatic filariasis. Annu Rev Entomol 54:469–487
Brattig NW, Rathjens U, Ernst M, Geisinger F, Renz A, Tischendorf FW (2000) Lipopolysaccharide-like molecules derived from Wolbachia endobacteria of the filaria Onchocerca volvulus are candidate mediators in the sequence of inflammatory and antiinflammatory responses of human monocytes. Microbes Infect 2(10):1147–1157
Cameron ML, Levy P, Nutman T, Vanamala CR, Narayanan PR, Rajan TV (1988) Use of restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLPs) to distinguish between nematodes of pathogenic significance. Parasitology 96(Pt 2):381–390
Casiraghi M, Anderson TJ, Bandi C, Bazzocchi C, Genchi C (2001) A phylogenetic analysis of filarial nematodes: comparison with the phylogeny of Wolbachia endosymbionts. Parasitology 122(Pt 1):93–103
Casiraghi M, McCall JW, Simoncini L, Kramer LH, Sacchi L, Genchi C, Werren JH, Bandi C (2002) Tetracycline treatment and sex-ratio distortion: a role for Wolbachia in the moulting of filarial nematodes? Int J Parasitol 32(12):1457–1468
Casiraghi M, Bain O, Guerrero R, Martin C, Pocacqua V, Gardner SL, Franceschi A, Bandi C (2004) Mapping the presence of Wolbachia pipientis on the phylogeny of filarial nematodes: evidence for symbiont loss during evolution. Int J Parasitol 34:191–203
Casiraghi M, Bordenstein SR, Baldo L, Lo N, Beninati T, Wernegreen JJ, Werren JH, Bandi C (2005) Phylogeny of Wolbachia pipientis based on gltA, groEL and ftsZ gene sequences: clustering of arthropod and nematode symbionts in the F supergroup, and evidence for further diversity in the Wolbachia tree. Microbiology 151:4015–4022
Choi EH, Zimmerman PA, Foster CB, Zhu S, Kumaraswami V, Nutman TB, Chanock SJ (2001) Genetic polymorphisms in molecules of innate immunity and susceptibility to infection with Wuchereria bancrofti in South India. Genes Immun 2(5):248–253
Dame JB, Yowell CA, Courtney CH, Lindgren WG (1991) Cloning and characterization of the ribosomal RNA gene repeat from Ostertagia ostertagi. Mol Biochem Parasitol 45(2):275–280
Das D, Kumar S, Sahoo PK, Dash AP (2005) A survey of bancroftian filariasis for microfilariae & circulating antigenaemia in two villages of Madhya Pradesh. Indian J Med Res 121:771–775
Das MK, Dhamodharan R, Hoti SL, Dash AP (2011) Molecular differentiation of nocturnally periodic and diurnally sub-periodic Wuchereria bancrofti by Randomly Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD). World J Microbiol Biotechnol 27:1525–1530
de Souza DK, Osei-Poku J, Blum J, Baidoo H, Brown CA, Lawson BW, Wilson MD, Bockarie MJ, Boakye DA (2014) The epidemiology of lymphatic filariasis in Ghana, explained by the possible existence of two strains of Wuchereria bancrofti. Pan Afr Med J 17:133. https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2014.17.133.3370
Dhamodharan R, Das MK, Hoti SL, Das PK, Dash AP (2008) Genetic variability of diurnally sub-periodic Wuchereria bancrofti in Nicobarese tribe of Nicobar group of islands, Andaman and Nicobar Islands, India. Parasitol Res 103(1):59–66
Dhamodharan R, Hoti S, Sivapragasam G, Das M (2011) Cloning and sequence analysis of partial genomic DNA coding for HtrA-type serine protease of Wolbachia from human lymphatic filarial parasite, Wuchereria bancrofti. Trop Parasitol 1:76–82
Dhamodharan R, Hoti SL, Sankari T (2012) Characterization of cofactor-independent phosphoglycerate mutase isoform-1 (Wb-iPGM) gene: a drug and diagnostic target from human lymphatic filarial parasite, Wuchereria bancrofti. Infect Genet Evol 12:957–965
Dreyer G, Addiss D, Williamson J, Noroes J (2006) Efficacy of co-administered diethylcarbamazine and albendazole against adult Wuchereria bancrofti. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 100(12):1118–1125
Fernando SD, Rodrigo C, Rajapakse S (2011) Current evidence on the use of antifilarial agents in the management of bancroftian filariasis. J Trop Med:175941
Ferri E, Bain O, Barbuto M, Martin C, Lo N, Uni S, Landmann F, Baccei SG, Guerrero R et al (2011) New insights into the evolution of Wolbachia infections in filarial nematodes inferred from a large range of screened species. PLoS One 6:e20843
Fischer P, Liu X, Lizotte-Waniewski M, Kamal IH, Ramzy RM, Williams SA (1999) Development of a quantitative, competitive polymerase chain reaction--enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the detection of Wuchereria bancrofti DNA. Parasitol Res 85:176–183
Fischer P, Wibowo H, Pischke S, Ruckert P, Liebau E, Ismid IS, Supali T (2002) PCR-based detection and identification of the filarial parasite Brugia timori from Alor Island, Indonesia. Ann Trop Med Parasitol 96:809–821
Fisher MC, Viney ME (1996) Microsatellites of the parasitic nematode Strongyloides ratti. Mol Biochem Parasitol 80(2):221–224
Fong MY, Noordin R, Lau YL, Cheong FW, Yunus MH, Idris ZM (2013) Comparative analysis of ITS1 nucleotide sequence reveals distinct genetic difference between Brugia malayi from northeast Borneo and Thailand. Parasitology 140:39–45
Foster J, Ganatra M, Kamal I, Ware J, Makarova K, Ivanova N, Bhattacharyya A, Kapatral V, Kumar S, Posfai J, Vincze T, Ingram J, Moran L, Lapidus A, Omelchenko M, Kyrpides N, Ghedin E, Wang S, Goltsman E, Joukov V, Ostrovskaya O, Tsukerman K, Mazur M, Comb D, Koonin E, Slatko B (2005) The Wolbachia genome of Brugia malayi: endosymbiont evolution within a human pathogenic nematode. PLoS Biol 3(4):e121
Gasser RB, Newton SE (2000) Genomic and genetic research on bursate nematodes: significance, implications and prospects. Int J Parasitol 30(4):509–534
Gasser RB, LeGoff L, Petit G, Bain O (1996) Rapid delineation of closely-related filarial parasites using genetic markers in spacer rDNA. Acta Trop 62(3):143–150
Ghedin E, Wang S, Foster JM, Slatko BE (2004) First sequenced genome of a parasitic nematode. Trends Parasitol 20:151–153
Ghedin E, Wang S, Spiro D, Caler E, Zhao Q, Crabtree J, Allen JE, Delcher AL, Guiliano DB et al (2007) Draft genome of the filarial nematode parasite Brugia malayi. Science 317(5845):1756–1760
Gogarten JP, Olendzenski L, Hilario E, Simon C, Holsinger KE (1996) Dating the Cenancester of organisms. Science 274(5293):1750b–1751b
Gomez-Escobar N, Gregory WF, Britton C, Murray L, Corton C, Hall N, Daub J, Blaxter ML, Maizels RM (2002) Abundant larval transcript-1 and -2 genes from Brugia malayi: diversity of genomic environments but conservation of 5′ promoter sequences functional in Caenorhabditis elegans. Mol Biochem Parasitol 125(1–2):59–71
Grant WN (1994) Genetic variation in parasitic nematodes and its implications. Int J Parasitol 24(6):821–830
Gregory WF, Blaxter ML, Maizels RM (1997) Differentially expressed, abundant trans-spliced cDNAs from larval Brugia malayi. Mol Biochem Parasitol 87(1):85–95
Henkle-Duhrsen K, Eckelt VH, Wildenburg G, Blaxter M, Walter RD (1998) Gene structure, activity and localization of a catalase from intracellular bacteria in Onchocerca volvulus. Mol Biochem Parasitol 96(1–2):69–81
Hirzmann J, Schnaufer A, Hintz M, Conraths F, Stirm S, Zahner H, Hobom G (1995) Brugia spp. and Litomosoides carinii: identification of a covalently cross-linked microfilarial sheath matrix protein (shp2). Mol Biochem Parasitol 70:95–106
Hise AG, Hazlett FE, Bockarie MJ, Zimmerman PA, Tisch DJ, Kazura JW (2003) Polymorphisms of innate immunity genes and susceptibility to lymphatic filariasis. Genes Immun 4(7):524–527
Hoekstra R, Criado-Fornelio A, Fakkeldij J, Bergman J, Roos MH (1997) Microsatellites of the parasitic nematode Haemonchus contortus: polymorphism and linkage with a direct repeat. Mol Biochem Parasitol 89(1):97–107
Hoerauf A, Nissen-Pahle K, Schmetz C, Henkle-Duhrsen K, Blaxter ML, Buttner DW, Gallin MY, Al-Qaoud KM, Lucius R, Fleischer B (1999) Tetracycline therapy targets intracellular bacteria in the filarial nematode Litomosoides sigmodontis and results in filarial infertility. J Clin Invest 103(1):11–18
Hoerauf A, Volkmann L, Hamelmann C, Adjei O, Autenrieth IB, Fleischer B, Buttner DW (2000) Endosymbiotic bacteria in worms as targets for a novel chemotherapy in filariasis. Lancet 355(9211):1242–1243
Hoerauf A, Specht S, Buttner M, Pfarr K, Mand S, Fimmers R, Marfo-Debrekyei Y, Konadu P, Debrah AY et al (2008) Wolbachia endobacteria depletion by doxycycline as antifilarial therapy has macrofilaricidal activity in onchocerciasis: a randomized placebo-controlled study. Med Microbiol Immunol 197:295–311
Hotez P, Ottesen E, Fenwick A, Molyneux D (2006) The neglected tropical diseases: the ancient afflictions of stigma and poverty and the prospects for their control and elimination. Adv Exp Med Biol 582:23–33
Hoti SL, Subramaniyan K, Das PK (2003) Detection of codon for amino acid 200 in isotype 1 beta-tubulin gene of Wuchereria bancrofti isolates, implicated in resistance to benzimidazoles in other nematodes. Acta Trop 88(1):77–81
Hoti SL, Thangadurai R, Patra KP, Das PK (2007) Polymorphism of gp15/400 allergen gene of Wuchereria bancrofti from different regions of India endemic for lymphatic filariasis. Infect Genet Evol 7(2):213–218
Hoti SL, Thangadurai R, Dhamodharan R, Das PK (2008) Genetic heterogeneity of Wuchereria bancrofti populations at spatially hierarchical levels in Pondicherry and surrounding areas, South India. Infect Genet Evol 8(5):644–652
Hoti SL, Dhamodharan R, Subramaniyan K, Das PK (2009) An allele specific PCR assay for screening for drug resistance among Wuchereria bancrofti populations in India. Indian J Med Res 130:193–199
Itoh M, Gunawardena NK, Qiu XG, Weerasooriya MV, Kimura E (1998) The use of whole blood absorbed on filter paper to detect Wuchereria bancrofti circulating antigen. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 92:513–515
Jain R, Rivera MC, Lake JA (1999) Horizontal gene transfer among genomes: the complexity hypothesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96(7):3801–3806
Jaoko WG, Michael E, Meyrowitsch DW, Estambale BB, Malecela MN, Simonsen PE (2007) Immunoepidemiology of Wuchereria bancrofti infection: parasite transmission intensity, filaria-specific antibodies, and host immunity in two east African communities. Infect Immun 75:5651–5662
Kalra NL (1974) Filariasis among aborigines of Andaman and Nicobar islands. J Commun Dis 6:40–56
Keddie EM, Higazi T, Unnasch TR (1998) The mitochondrial genome of Onchocerca volvulus: sequence, structure and phylogenetic analysis. Mol Biochem Parasitol 95(1):111–127
Keiser PB, Reynolds SM, Awadzi K, Ottesen EA, Taylor MJ, Nutman TB (2002) Bacterial endosymbionts of Onchocerca volvulus in the pathogenesis of posttreatment reactions. J Infect Dis 185(6):805–811
Lavrov DV, Brown WM (2001) Trichinella spiralis mtDNA: a nematode mitochondrial genome that encodes a putative ATP8 and normally structured tRNAS and has a gene arrangement relatable to those of coelomate metazoans. Genetics 157:621–637
Leslie JF, Cain GD, Meffe GK, Vrijenhoek RC (1982) Enzyme polymorphism in Ascaris suum (Nematoda). J Parasitol 68(4):576–587
Maizels RM, Kurniawan-Atmadja A (2002) Variation and polymorphism in helminth parasites. Parasitology 125(Suppl):S25–S37
Maizels RM, Gomez-Escobar N, Gregory WF, Murray J, Zang X (2001) Immune evasion genes from filarial nematodes. Int J Parasitol 31(9):889–898
Makova KD, Nekrutenko A, Baker RJ (2000) Evolution of microsatellite alleles in four species of mice (genus Apodemus). J Mol Evol 51(2):166–172
Manson-Bahr P EC, Bell DR (1995) Manson’s tropical diseases, 20th edn. ELBS Pub, pp 350–355, 1425–1435
McCarthy JS, Zhong M, Gopinath R, Ottesen EA, Williams SA, Nutman TB (1996) Evaluation of a polymerase chain reaction-based assay for diagnosis of Wuchereria bancrofti infection. J Infect Dis 173(6):1510–1514
McNulty SN, Mullin AS, Vaughan JA, Tkach VV, Weil GJ, Fischer PU (2012) Comparing the mitochondrial genomes of Wolbachia-dependent and independent filarial nematode species. BMC Genomics 13:145
McNulty SN, Mitreva M, Weil GJ, Fischer PU (2013) Inter and intra-specific diversity of parasites that cause lymphatic filariasis. Infect Genet Evol 14:137–146
McReynolds LA, DeSimone SM, Williams SA (1986) Cloning and comparison of repeated DNA sequences from the human filarial parasite Brugia malayi and the animal parasite Brugia pahangi. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83(3):797–801
Melrose WD (2002) Lymphatic filariasis: new insights into an old disease. Int J Parasitol 32(8):947–960
Meyrowitsch DW, Simonsen PE, Magesa SM (2004) Long-term effect of three different strategies for mass diethylcarbamazine administration in bancroftian filariasis: follow-up at 10 years after treatment. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 98(11):627–634
Michael E, Bundy DA (1997) Global mapping of lymphatic filariasis. Parasitol Today 13(12):472–476
Molyneux DH, Zagaria N (2002) Lymphatic filariasis elimination: progress in global programme development. Ann Trop Med Parasitol 96(Suppl 2):S15–S40
Morgan UM, Constantine CC, Greene WK, Thompson RC (1993) RAPD (random amplified polymorphic DNA) analysis of Giardia DNA and correlation with isoenzyme data. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 87(6):702–705
Nadler SA (1987) Biochemical and immunological systematics of some ascaridoid nematodes: genetic divergence between congeners. J Parasitol 73(4):811–816
Nadler SA (1990) Molecular approaches to studying helminth population genetics and phylogeny. Int J Parasitol 20(1):11–29
Nadler SA (1992) Phylogeny of some ascaridoid nematodes, inferred from comparison of 18S and 28S rRNA sequences. Mol Biol Evol 9(5):932–944
Nuchprayoon S (2009) DNA-based diagnosis of lymphatic filariasis. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 40:904–913
Nuchprayoon S, Sangprakarn S, Junpee A, Nithiuthai S, Chungpivat S, Poovorawan Y (2003a) Differentiation of Brugia malayi and Brugia pahangi by PCR-RFLP of ITS1 and ITS2. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 34(Suppl 2):67–73
Nuchprayoon S, Sanprasert V, Porksakorn C, Nuchprayoon I (2003b) Prevalence of bancroftian filariasis on the Thai-Myanmar border. Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol 21(3):179–188
Nuchprayoon S, Junpee A, Poovorawan Y, Scott AL (2005) Detection and differentiation of filarial parasites by universal primers and polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis. Am J Trop Med Hyg 73:895–900
Nuchprayoon S, Junpee A, Poovorawan Y (2007) Random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) for differentiation between Thai and Myanmar strains of Wuchereria bancrofti. Filaria J 6:6
Okimoto R, Macfarlane JL, Clary DO, Wolstenholme DR (1992) The mitochondrial genomes of two nematodes, Caenorhabditis elegans and Ascaris suum. Genetics 130(3):471–498
Ottesen EA, Kumaraswami V, Paranjape R, Poindexter RW, Tripathy SP (1981) Naturally occurring blocking antibodies modulate immediate hypersensitivity responses in human filariasis. J Immunol 127(5):2014–2020
Ottesen EA, Duke BO, Karam M, Behbehani K (1997) Strategies and tools for the control/elimination of lymphatic filariasis. Bull World Health Organ 75:491–503
Ottesen EA, Ismail MM, Horton J (1999) The role of albendazole in programmes to eliminate lymphatic filariasis. Parasitol Today 15(9):382–386
Pandiaraja P, Murugan V, Hoti SL, Kaliraj P (2010) Molecular characterization of a truncated antigen (Wb14) of SXP-1 of Wuchereria bancrofti from four endemic regions in India. Exp Parasitol 125:236–243
Pani SP, Hoti SL, Elango A, Yuvaraj J, Lall R, Ramaiah KD (2000) Evaluation of the ICT whole blood antigen card test to detect infection due to nocturnally periodic Wuchereria bancrofti in South India. Tropical Med Int Health 5(5):359–363
Parra G et al (2007) CEGMA: a pipeline to accurately annotate core genes in eukaryotic genomes. Bioinformatics 23:1061–1067
Partono F (1987) The spectrum of disease in lymphatic filariasis. Ciba Found Symp 127:15–31
Patra KP, Ramu T, Hoti SL, Pragasam GS, Das PK (2007) Identification of a molecular marker for genotyping human lymphatic filarial nematode parasite Wuchereria bancrofti. Exp Parasitol 116(1):59–65
Pichon G, Treuil JP (2004) Genetic determinism of parasitic circadian periodicity and subperiodicity in human lymphatic filariasis. C R Biol 327:1087–1094
Piessens WF, McGreevy PB, Piessens PW, McGreevy M, Koiman I, Saroso JS, Dennis DT (1980) Immune responses in human infections with Brugia malayi: specific cellular unresponsiveness to filarial antigens. J Clin Invest 65:172–179. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI109648
Plaisier AP, Stolk WA, van Oortmarssen GJ, Habbema JD (2000) Effectiveness of annual ivermectin treatment for Wuchereria bancrofti infection. Parasitol Today 16(7):298–302
Pothikasikorn J, Bangs MJ, Boonplueang R, Chareonviriyaphap T (2008) Susceptibility of various mosquitoes of Thailand to nocturnal subperiodic Wuchereria bancrofti. J Vector Ecol 33:313–320
Pradeep Kumar N, Patra KP, Hoti SL, Das PK (2002) Genetic variability of the human filarial parasite, Wuchereria bancrofti in South India. Acta Trop 82(1):67–76
Prichard RK (1990) Anthelmintic resistance in nematodes: extent, recent understanding and future directions for control and research. Int J Parasitol 20:515–523
Prichard RK (2007) Ivermectin resistance and overview of the consortium for anthelmintic resistance SNPs. Expert Opin Drug Discov 2:S41–S52
Rahmah N, Lim BH, Azian H, Ramelah TS, Rohana AR (2003) Short communication: use of a recombinant antigen-based ELISA to determine prevalence of brugian filariasis among Malaysian schoolchildren near Pasir mas, Kelantan-Thailand border. Tropical Med Int Health 8:158–163
Raina VK, Joshi MC, Singh S, Joshi RD, Bhattacharjee KK, Kumar A, Verghese T (1990) Epidemiology of Brugia malayi infection and its co-existence with Wuchereria bancrofti in and around Sillaberia PHC, district Midnapur, West Bengal. J Commun Dis 22:205–208
Rajendran G, Panicker KN, Krishnamoorthy K, Sabesan S, Snehlatha, Radhakrishnan R (1997) Current status of filariasis in Chavakad taluk, Trichur district, Kerala. J Commun Dis 29:333–343
Ramesh A, Small ST, Kloos ZA, Kazura JW, Nutman TB, Serre D, Zimmerman PA (2012) The complete mitochondrial genome sequence of the filarial nematode Wuchereria bancrofti from three geographic isolates provides evidence of complex demographic history. Mol Biochem Parasitol 183:32–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molbiopara.2012.01.004
Rao RU (2005) Endosymbiotic Wolbachia of parasitic filarial nematodes as drug targets. Indian J Med Res 122:199–204
Rao UR, Salinas G, Mehta K, Klei TR (2000) Identification and localization of glutathione S-transferase as a potential target enzyme in Brugia species. Parasitol Res 86(11):908–915
Rao RU, Atkinson LJ, Ramzy RM, Helmy H, Farid HA, Bockarie MJ, Susapu M, Laney SJ, Williams SA, Weil GJ (2006) A real-time PCR-based assay for detection of Wuchereria bancrofti DNA in blood and mosquitoes. Am J Trop Med Hyg 74(5):826–832
Ravindran B, Satapathy AK, Sahoo PK (1994) Bancroftian filariasis-differential reactivity of anti-sheath antibodies in microfilariae carriers. Parasite Immunol 16:321–323
Remme JH, Blas E, Chitsulo L, Desjeux PM, Engers HD, Kanyok TP, Kayondo JF, Kioy DW, Kumaraswami V, Lazdins JK, Nunn PP, Oduola A, Ridley RG, Toure YT, Zicker F, Morel CM (2002) Strategic emphases for tropical diseases research: a TDR perspective. Trends Microbiol 10(10):435–440
Rosenthal AN, Ryan A, Hopster D, Jacobs IJ (2002) Molecular evidence of a common clonal origin and subsequent divergent clonal evolution in vulval intraepithelial neoplasia, vulval squamous cell carcinoma and lymph node metastases. Int J Cancer 99(4):549–554
Routh HB, Bhowmik KR (1994) Filariasis. Dermatol Clin 12:719–727
Russel S, Das M, Rao C (1975) Filariasis in Andaman and Nicobar Islands I. survey findings. Nancowry, Teressa, Chowra, Car Nicobar and Port Blair. J Commun Dis 7:15–30
Sabesan S, Palaniyandi M, Das PK, Michael E (2000) Mapping of lymphatic filariasis in India. Ann Trop Med Parasitol 94(6):591–606
Sakthidevi M, Murugan V, Hoti SL, Kaliraj P (2010) Lymphatic filarial species differentiation using evolutionarily modified tandem repeats: generation of new genetic markers. Infect Genet Evol 10:591–594
Sasa M (1974) Anti-filariasis campaign: its history and future prospects. Prog Drug Res 18:259–268
Sasa M, Tanaka H (1974) A statistical method for comparison and classification of the microfilarial periodicity. Jpn J Exp Med 44(4):321–346
Schwab AE, Boakye DA, Kyelem D, Prichard RK (2005) Detection of benzimidazole resistance-associated mutations in the filarial nematode Wuchereria bancrofti and evidence for selection by albendazole and ivermectin combination treatment. Am J Trop Med Hyg 73(2):234–238
Schwab AE, Churcher TS, Schwab AJ, Basanez MG, Prichard RK (2007) An analysis of the population genetics of potential multi-drug resistance in Wuchereria bancrofti due to combination chemotherapy. Parasitology 134:1025–1040
Scott AL, Ghedin E, Nutman TB, McReynolds LA, Poole CB, Slatko BE, Foster JM (2013) Filarial and Wolbachia genomics. Parasite Immunol 34:121–129
Shahab M, Verma M, Pathak M, Mitra K, Misra-Bhattacharya S (2014) Cloning, expression and characterization of UDP-N-acetylglucosamine enolpyruvyl transferase (MurA) from Wolbachia endosymbiont of human lymphatic filarial parasite Brugia malayi. PLoS One 9:e99884
Sharma R, Hoti SL, Vasuki V, Sankari T, Meena RL, Das PK (2013) Filamentation temperature-sensitive protein Z (FtsZ) of Wolbachia, endosymbiont of Wuchereria bancrofti: a potential target for anti-filarial chemotherapy. Acta Trop 125:330–338
Shriram AN, Murhekar MV, Ramaiah KD, Sehgal SC (2002) Prevalence of diurnally subperiodic bancroftian filariasis among the Nicobarese in Andaman and Nicobar Islands, India: effect of age and gender. Tropical Med Int Health 7:949–954
Simonsen PE (2003) Filariasis. In: Cook GC, Zumla A (eds) Manson’s tropical diseases, 21st edn. W. B. Saunders, London, pp 1489–1526
Sire C, Langand J, Barral V, Theron A (2001) Parasite (Schistosoma mansoni) and host (Biomphalaria glabrata) genetic diversity: population structure in a fragmented landscape. Parasitology 122(Pt 5):545–554
Sironi M, Bandi C, Sacchi L, Di Sacco B, Damiani G, Genchi C (1995) Molecular evidence for a close relative of the arthropod endosymbiont Wolbachia in a filarial worm. Mol Biochem Parasitol 74(2):223–227
Slatko BE, Luck AN, Dobson SL, Foster JM (2014) Wolbachia endosymbionts and human disease control. Mol Biochem Parasitol 195:88–95
Small ST, Ramesh A, Bun K, Reimer L, Thomsen E, Baea M, Bockarie MJ, Siba P, Kazura JW et al (2013) Population genetics of the filarial worm Wuchereria bancrofti in a post-treatment region of Papua New Guinea: insights into diversity and life history. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 7:e2308
Small ST, Tisch DJ, Zimmerman PA (2014) Molecular epidemiology, phylogeny and evolution of the filarial nematode Wuchereria bancrofti. Infect Genet Evol 28:33–43
Smith HL, Rajan TV (2000) Tetracycline inhibits development of the infective-stage larvae of filarial nematodes in vitro. Exp Parasitol 95(4):265–270
Supali T, Rahmah N, Djuardi Y, Sartono E, Ruckert P, Fischer P (2004) Detection of filaria-specific IgG4 antibodies using Brugia rapid test in individuals from an area highly endemic for Brugia timori. Acta Trop 90:255–261
Tarrant CA, Blouin MS, Yowell CA, Dame JB (1992) Suitability of mitochondrial DNA for assaying interindividual genetic variation in small helminths. J Parasitol 78(2):374–378
Tautz D (1989) Hypervariability of simple sequences as a general source for polymorphic DNA markers. Nucleic Acids Res 17(16):6463–6471
Taylor MJ (2000) Wolbachia bacteria of filarial nematodes in the pathogenesis of disease and as a target for control. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 94(6):596–598
Taylor MJ (2002) A new insight into the pathogenesis of filarial disease. Curr Mol Med 2(3):299–302
Taylor MJ, Bilo K, Cross HF, Archer JP, Underwood AP (1999) 16S rDNA phylogeny and ultrastructural characterization of Wolbachia intracellular bacteria of the filarial nematodes Brugia malayi, B. Pahangi, and Wuchereria bancrofti. Exp Parasitol 91(4):356–361
Taylor MJ, Bandi C, Hoerauf AM, Lazdins J (2000) Wolbachia bacteria of filarial nematodes: a target for control? Parasitol Today 16(5):179–180
Taylor MD, LeGoff L, Harris A, Malone E, Allen JE, Maizels RM (2005) Removal of regulatory T cell activity reverses hyporesponsiveness and leads to filarial parasite clearance in vivo. J Immunol 174(8):4924–4933
Thangadurai R, Hoti SL, Kumar NP, Das PK (2006) Phylogeography of human lymphatic filarial parasite, Wuchereria bancrofti in India. Acta Trop 98(3):297–304
Thanomsub BW, Chansiri K, Sarataphan N, Phantana S (2000) Differential diagnosis of human lymphatic filariasis using PCR-RFLP. Mol Cell Probes 14(1):41–46
Thiery M, Mugniery D (2000) Microsatellite loci in the phytoparasitic nematode Globodera. Genome 43(1):160–165
Thorpe V (1896) Filaria sanguinis hominis in the South Sea islands, with photomicrographs from Tonga & the friendly islands. Br Med J 2:922–924
Tisch DJ, Hazlett FE, Kastens W, Alpers MP, Bockarie MJ, Kazura JW (2001) Ecologic and biologic determinants of filarial antigenemia in bancroftian filariasis in Papua New Guinea. J Infect Dis 184(7):898–904
Triteeraprapab S, Karnjanopas K, Porksakorn C, Sai-Ngam A, Yentakam S, Loymak S (2001) Lymphatic filariasis caused by Brugia malayi in an endemic area of Narathiwat Province, southern of Thailand. J Med Assoc Thail 84(Suppl 1):S182–S188
Underwood AP, Supali T, Wu Y, Bianco AE (2000) Two microsatellite loci from Brugia malayi show polymorphisms among isolates from Indonesia and Malaysia. Mol Biochem Parasitol 106:299–302
Unnasch TR, Williams SA (2000) The genomes of Onchocerca volvulus. Int J Parasitol 30:543–552
Vasuki V, Hoti SL, Sadanandane C, Jambulingam P (2003) A simple and rapid DNA extraction method for the detection of Wuchereria bancrofti infection in the vector mosquito, Culex quinquefasciatus by Ssp I PCR assay. Acta Trop 86(1):109–114
Vasuki V, Subramanian S, Hoti SL, Jambulingam P (2012) Use of a simple DNA extraction method for high-throughput detection of filarial parasite Wuchereria bancrofti in the vector mosquitoes. Parasitol Res 111:2479–2481
Wallace DC (1999) Mitochondrial diseases in man and mouse. Science 283(5407):1482–1488
Weerasooriya MV, Mudalige MP, Gunawardena NK, Kimura E, Samarawickrema WA (1998) Microfilarial periodicity of Wuchereria bancrofti and man landing periodicity of the vector Culex quinquefasciatus say in Matara, Sri Lanka. Ceylon Med J 43:78–83
Weil GJ, Ramzy RM (2007) Diagnostic tools for filariasis elimination programs. Trends Parasitol 23:78–82
Weil GJ, Lammie PJ, Weiss N (1997) The ICT Filariasis test: a rapid-format antigen test for diagnosis of bancroftian filariasis. Parasitol Today 13(10):401–404
Weil GJ, Curtis KC, Fischer PU, Won KY, Lammie PJ, Joseph H, Melrose WD, Brattig NW (2011) A multicenter evaluation of a new antibody test kit for lymphatic filariasis employing recombinant Brugia malayi antigen Bm-14. Acta Trop 120(Suppl 1):S19–S22
Werren JH (1997) Biology of Wolbachia. Annu Rev Entomol 42:587–609
WHO (1992) Lymphatic filariasis, the disease and its control. Fifth report of the WHO expert committee on filariasis. Tech Rep Ser 821:1–31
WHO (1995) World health report 1995. Bridging the gaps, Geneva
WHO (2002) Annual report on lymphatic filariasis 2001. Global programme to eliminate lymphatic filariasis. WHO/CDS/CPE/CEE/2002 28:1–8
WHO (2007) Global programme to eliminate lymphatic filariasis. Wkly Epidemiol Rec 82:361–380
WHO (2014) Global programme to eliminate lymphatic filariasis. Wkly Epidemiol Rec 89:409–420
Williams JG, Kubelik AR, Livak KJ, Rafalski JA, Tingey SV (1990) DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers. Nucleic Acids Res 18:6531–6535
Williams SA, Nicolas L, Lizotte-Waniewski M, Plichart C, Luquiaud P, Nguyen LN, Moulia-Pelat JP (1996) A polymerase chain reaction assay for the detection of Wuchereria bancrofti in blood samples from French Polynesia. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 90:384–387
Williams SA, Lizotte-Waniewski MR, Foster J, Guiliano D, Daub J, Scott AL, Slatko B, Blaxter ML (2000) The filarial genome project: analysis of the nuclear, mitochondrial and endosymbiont genomes of Brugia malayi. Int J Parasitol 30(4):411–419
Zahner J, Hobom G, Stirm S (1995) The microfilarial sheath and its proteins. Parasitology today 11: 116–120
Zaman V, Narayanan E (1986) Differentiation of infective larvae of Brugia malayi and Wuchereria bancrofti by scanning electron microscopy. Ann Trop Med Parasitol 80:333–338
Zarlenga DS, Aschenbrenner RA, Lichtenfels JR (1996) Variations in microsatellite sequences provide evidence for population differences and multiple ribosomal gene repeats within Trichinella pseudospiralis. J Parasitol 82(4):534–538
Zhong M, McCarthy J, Bierwert L, Lizotte-Waniewski M, Chanteau S, Nutman TB, Ottesen EA, Williams SA (1996) A polymerase chain reaction assay for detection of the parasite Wuchereria bancrofti in human blood samples. Am J Trop Med Hyg 54:357–363
Zhu XQ, Gasser RB (1998) Single-strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP)-based mutation scanning approaches to fingerprint sequence variation in ribosomal DNA of ascaridoid nematodes. Electrophoresis 19:1366–1373
Acknowledgment
Author Ramasamy Dhamodharan is recipient of BK21 Plus Postdoctoral Research Fellowship, South Korea.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hoti, S.L., Dhamodharan, R. (2018). Genetic Diversity, Molecular Markers, and Population Genetics of Human Lymphatic Filarial Parasites. In: Tyagi, B. (eds) Lymphatic Filariasis. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1391-2_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1391-2_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-1390-5
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-1391-2
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)