Skip to main content

Integrating Majors and Non-majors in an International Engineering Service-Learning Programme: Course Design, Student Assessments and Learning Outcomes

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Service-Learning for Youth Leadership

Part of the book series: Quality of Life in Asia ((QLAS,volume 12))

Abstract

The trend towards a globalized and knowledge-based society is one of the development hallmarks of the twenty-first century, and there have been numerous education reforms in response to this trend. Engineering education is no exception. Traditionally, engineering education places heavy emphasis on technical aspects, such as mathematical and scientific fundamentals. This heavy focus on the theory and technical aspects often hinders other professions from understanding the world of engineering. As a result, the general public often views engineering as a field that is isolated and difficult to comprehend, which also limits the development of engineering (Morris et al. in Eur J Eng Educ 32(2):135–142, 2007). However, it has become increasingly difficult to perform professionally in this evolving global environment within traditional curricular (National Academy of Engineering in The engineer of 2020: Visions of engineering in the new century. National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2004). The National Academy of Engineering forecasts that, in 2020, engineers not only need to be technically competent, but also be trained in other ‘soft skills’, such as civic responsibility , intercultural competence , leadership , communication and management, for them to be able to contribute to society (Galloway in Civ Eng Mag Arch 77(11):46–104, 2007). In this chapter, we present an engineering service-learning subject that was designed to incorporate major and non-major students. This multidisciplinary subject, which incorporates an international service-learning project , aims to provide a holistic learning experience that raises the problem-solving skills and general knowledge for all students, in particular, to teach students about the impact of engineering on society, and human and societal factors in engineering. Course design , challenges that we encountered, impacts on major and non-major students, and the limitations of this multidisciplinary approach will be discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bielefeldt, A. R., & Pearce, J. M. (2012). Service learning in engineering. Convergence: Philosophies and pedagogies for developing the next generation of humanitarian engineers and social entrepreneurs. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/materials_fp/54/.

  • Bielefeldt, A. R., Dewoolkar, M. M., Caves, K. M., Berdanier, B. W., & Paterson, K. G. (2011). Diverse models for incorporating service projects into engineering capstone design courses. International Journal of Engineering Education, 1206–1220. Retrieved from http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-81155137230&partnerID=40&md5=64ed58246995c00b802766617d710206.

  • Bringle, R. G., Hatcher, J., & Jones, S. G. (2011). International service learning: Conceptual frameworks and research. VA, USA: Stylus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bringle, R., & Hatcher, J. (2009). Innovative practices in service learning and curricular engagement. New Directions for Higher Education. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/he.356/full.

  • Chupp, M. G., & Joseph, M. L. (2010). Getting the most out of service learning: Maximizing student, university and community impact. Journal of Community Practice, 18(2–3), 190–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705422.2010.487045.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coyle, E. J., Jamieson, L. H., & Oakes, W. C. (2005). EPICS: Engineering projects in community service. International Journal of Engineering Education, 21. Retrieved from http://staging.community-wealth.org/sites/clone.community-wealth.org/files/downloads/article-coyle-et-al.pdf.

  • Dewoolkar, M. M., George, L. A., Hayden, N. J., & Rizzo, D. M. (2009). Vertical integration of service-learning into civil and environmental engineering curricula. International Journal of Engineering Education, 56(6), 1257–1269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffy, J., Barington, L., Moeller, W., Barry, C., Kazmer, D., West, C., & Crespo, V. (2008). Service-learning projects in core undergraduate engineering courses. International Journal for Service Learning in Engineering, Humanitarian Engineering and Social Entrepreneurship, 3(2). http://doi.org/10.24908/ijsle.v3i2.2103.

  • Duffy, J., Tsang, E., & Lord, S. (2000). Service-learning in engineering: What, why, and how? American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwin, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Choice Reviews Online, 35(3), 35–1826. https://doi.org/10.5860/CHOICE.35-1826.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galloway, P. D. (2007). The 21st-century engineer: A proposal for engineering education reform. Civil Engineering Magazine Archive, 77(11), 46–104. https://doi.org/10.1061/ciegag.0000147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, J. (2006). A model for interdisciplinary service-learning experience for social change. Journal of Physical Therapy Education, 20(3), 55–60. Retrieved from https://login.proxy.bib.uottawa.ca/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=cin20&AN=2009521318&site=ehost-live.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobson, R. S. (2000). Service-Learning as an educational tool in an introduction to engineering course. In American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference (p. 3253).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, B. (1996). Service-learning in today’s higher education. In Service-learning in higher education: Concepts and practices. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaunonen, G. (2010). Engineering world health. IEEE Pulse, 1(2), 28–33. https://doi.org/10.1109/MPUL.2010.938710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knizley, A., & Coleman, T. (2014). Implementing service-learning into an introductory mechanical engineering course. In American Society for Engineering Education. Retrieved from http://asee.cs.southern.edu/proceedings/ASEE2014/Papers2014/4/54.pdf.

  • Lin, Z., & Vernaza, K. (2016). Teaching first year engineering students engineering design process and problem solving through service learning projects. In 2016 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) (pp. 1–7). http://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2016.7757495.

  • Morris, R., Childs, P. R., & Hamilton, T. (2007). Sustainability by design: A reflection on the suitability of pedagogic practice in design and engineering courses in the teaching of sustainable design. European Journal of Engineering Education, 32(2), 135–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043790601118549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Academy of Engineering. (2004). The engineer of 2020: Visions of engineering in the new century. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press. http://doi.org/10.17226/10999.

  • Ngai, G., & Chan, S. C. (2015). How much impact can be made in a week? In Proceedings of the 46th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education—SIGCSE ’15 (pp. 645–650). New York, USA: ACM Press. http://doi.org/10.1145/2676723.2677267.

  • Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66(4), 543–578. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543066004543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramírez, M. C., Bengo, I., Mereu, R., Bejarano R., A. X., & Silva, J. C. (2011). Participative methodology for local development: The contribution of engineers without borders from Italy and Colombia: Towards the improvement of water quality in vulnerable communities. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 24(1), 45–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-010-9175-3.

  • Ropers-Huilman, B., Carwile, L., & Lima, M. (2005). Service-learning in engineering : A valuable pedagogy for meeting learning objectives. European Journal of Engineering Education, 30, 155–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043790410001664363.

  • Schunk, D. H. (2003). Self-efficacy for reading and writing: Influence of modeling, goal setting, and self-evaluation. Reading and Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 19(2), 159–172. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ672802.

  • Stebleton, M., Jensen, M., & Peter, G. (2010). Enhancing student engagement in a multidisciplinary, first-year experience course. College Teaching Methods & Styles Journal, 6, 1–6. Retrieved from http://libaccess.mcmaster.ca/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/964182470?accountid=12347%5Cnhttp://sfx.scholarsportal.info/mcmaster?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&genre=article&sid=ProQ:ProQ%3Aericshell&atitle=Enha.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dinther, M., Dochy, F., & Segers, M. (2011). Factors affecting students’ self-efficacy in higher education. Educational Research Review, 6(2), 95–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2010.10.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeidmane, A., & Cernajeva, S. (2011). Interdisciplinary approach in engineering education. In 2011 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference, EDUCON 2011 (pp. 1096–1101). http://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2011.5773284.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kenneth W. K. Lo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lo, K.W.K., Ip, A.K.Y., Lau, C.K., Wong, W.S., Ngai, G., Chan, S.C.F. (2019). Integrating Majors and Non-majors in an International Engineering Service-Learning Programme: Course Design, Student Assessments and Learning Outcomes. In: T. L. Shek, D., Ngai, G., C. F. Chan, S. (eds) Service-Learning for Youth Leadership. Quality of Life in Asia, vol 12. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0448-4_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0448-4_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-0447-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-0448-4

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics