Skip to main content

The Role of Bystanders in Workplace Bullying: An Overview of Theories and Empirical Research

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Pathways of Job-related Negative Behaviour

Abstract

This chapter gives a contemporary overview of extant international research focusing on issues related to bystanders in workplace bullying. First, the chapter introduces concepts and typologies of bystanders as found in the literature, after which follows a presentation of the early and later studies on bystanders and bystander behaviour. While the early studies mainly focused on the prevalence of observing bullying, later studies explored typologies of bystanders, consequences of being a bystander as well as the antecedents of bystander behaviour. As such, there has been a paradigmatic shift within the field of workplace bullying with bystanders now being seen as part of the problem and therefore as a possible part of the solution. The small but expanding body of bystander research has employed a surprisingly wide range of complementary methodologies which shows promising and consistent findings and enhances the robustness of the research. The chapter also elaborates on possible interventions and on a model of intervention building from theory and empirical findings. Finally, the chapter concludes with practical implications and future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aguinis, H., & Bradley, K. J. (2014). Best practice recommendations for designing and implementing experimental vignette methodology studies. Organizational Research Methods, 17(4), 351–371. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114547952.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, L. M., & Pearson, C. M. (1999). Tit for tat? The spiraling effect of incivility in the workplace. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 452–471. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1999.2202131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aquino, K., & Reed, A., II. (2002). The self-importance of moral identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6), 1423–1440. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.6.1423.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Archer, D. (1999). Exploring ‘bullying’ culture in the para-military organisation. International Journal of Manpower, 20(1/2), 94–105. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437729910268687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atlas, R. S., & Pepler, D. J. (1998). Observations of bullying in the classroom. Journal of Educational Research, 92(2), 86. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220679809597580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Báez-León, C., Moreno-Jiménez, B., Aguirre-Camacho, A., & Olmos, R. (2016). Factors influencing intention to help and helping behaviour in witnesses of bullying in nursing settings. Nursing Inquiry, 23(4), 358–367. https://doi.org/10.1111/nin.12149.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W H Freeman/Times Books/Henry Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barlińska, J., Szuster, A., & Winiewski, M. (2013). Cyberbullying among adolescent bystanders: Role of the communication medium, form of violence, and empathy. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 23(1), 37–51. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartholomew, L. K., & Mullen, P. D. (2011). Five roles for using theory and evidence in the design and testing of behavior change interventions. Journal of Public Health Dentistry, 71(Supplement 1), S20–S33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-7325.2011.00223.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Batson, C. D., Eklund, J. H., Chermok, V. L., Hoyt, J. L., & Ortiz, B. G. (2007). An additional antecedent of empathic concern: Valuing the welfare of the person in need. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 93(1), 65–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Björkqvist, K., Österman, K., & Lagerspetz, K. M. J. (1994). Sex differences in covert aggression among adults. Aggressive Behavior, 20(1), 27–33. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2337(1994)20:1<27::aid-ab2480200105>3.0.co;2-q.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloch, C. (2010). Negative acts and bullying: Face-threatening acts, social bonds and social place. In B. Sieben & Å. Wettergren (Eds.), Emotionalizing organizations and organizing emotions. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloch, C. (2012). How witnesses contribute to bullying in the workplace. In N. Tehrani (Ed.), Workplace bullying: Symptoms and solutions (pp. 81–96). New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bos, A. E. R., Dijker, A. J. M., & Koomen, W. (2007). Sex differences in emotional and behavioral responses to HIV+ individuals’ expression of distress. Psychology & Health, 22(4), 493–511. https://doi.org/10.1080/14768320600976257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowes-Sperry, L., & O’Leary-Kelly, A. M. (2005). To act or not to act: The dilemma faced by sexual harassment observers. Academy of Management Review, 30(2), 288–306. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2005.16387886.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Branch, S., Ramsay, S., & Barker, M. (2013). Workplace bullying, mobbing and general harassment: A review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15, 280–299. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2012.00339.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brickman, P., Rabinowitz, V. C., Karuza, J. J., Coates, D., Cohn, E., & Kidder, L. (1982). Models of helping and coping. American Psychologist, 37(4), 368–384. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.37.4.368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brodsky, C. M. (1976). The harassed worker. Oxford, UK: D. C. Heath &.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carver, C. S. (2007). Stress, coping, and health. In H. S. Friedman & R. C. Silver (Eds.), Foundations of health psychology (pp. 117–144). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chipps, E., & McRury, M. (2012). The development of an educational intervention to address workplace bullying: A pilot study. Journal for Nurses in Staff Development, 28(3), 94–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cilliers, F. (2012). A systems psychodynamic description of organisational bullying experiences. South African Journal of Industrial Psychology, 38(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v38i2.994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, C. (1990). Emotions and micropolitics in everyday life: Some patterns and paradoxes of ‘place’. In T. D. Kemper & T. D. Kemper (Eds.), Research agendas in the sociology of emotions (pp. 305–333). Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper-Thomas, H., Bentley, T. A., Catley, B. E., Gardner, D. H., O’Driscoll, M., & Trenberth, L. (2014). The impact of bullying on observers and targets. New Zealand Journal of Human Resource Management, 14(2), 82–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Copeland, J. T. (1994). Prophecies of power: Motivational implications of social power for behavioral confirmation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(2), 264–277. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.2.264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coyne, I., Gopaul, A.-M., Campbell, M., Pankász, A., Garland, R., & Cousans, F. (2017). Bystander responses to bullying at work: The role of mode, type and relationship to target. Journal of Business Ethics (Preprints), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3692-2.

  • Cropanzano, R., Goldman, B., & Folger, R. (2003). Deontic justice: The role of moral principles in workplace fairness. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24(8), 1019–1024. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Cruz, P., & Noronha, E. (2010). Protecting my interests: HRM and targets’ coping with workplace bullying. Qualitative Report, 15(3), 507–534.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Cruz, P., & Noronha, E. (2011). The limits to workplace friendship: Managerialist HRM and bystander behaviour in the context of workplace bullying. Employee Relations, 33(3), 269–288. https://doi.org/10.1108/01425451111121777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Cruz, P., & Noronha, E. (2013). Navigating the extended reach: Target experiences of cyberbullying at work. Information and Organization, 23(4), 324–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2013.09.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Cruz, P., & Noronha, E. (2017). Workplace cyberbullying. In K. Briken et al. (Eds.), The new digital workplace: How new technologies revolutionize work. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Cruz, P., Paull, M., Omari, M., & Guneri-Cangarli, B. (2016). Target experiences of workplace bullying: Insights from Australia, India and Turkey. Employee Relations, 38(5), 805–823. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-06-2015-0116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dehue, F., Bolman, C., Völlink, T., & Pouwelse, M. (2012). Coping with bullying at work and health related problems. International Journal of Stress Management, 19(3), 175–197. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desrumaux, P., Machado, T., Przygodzki-Lionet, N., & Lourel, M. (2015). Workplace bullying and victims’ prosocial or antisocial behaviors: What are the effects on equity, responsibility judgments, and help giving? Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 25(6), 509–521. https://doi.org/10.1080/10911359.2014.988318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dijker, A. J. M., & Koomen, W. (2003). Extending Weiner’s attribution-emotion model of stigmatization of ill persons. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 25(1), 51–68. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15324834BASP25014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Djurkovic, N., McCormack, D., & Casimir, G. (2005). The behavioral reactions of victims to different types of workplace bullying. International Journal of Organization Theory & Behavior, 8(4), 439–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunkel-Schetter, C., Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R. S. (1987). Correlates of social support receipt. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(1), 71–80. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.53.1.71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H. (2009). The his and hers of prosocial behavior: An examination of the social psychology of gender. American Psychologist, 64(8), 644–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., & Crowley, M. (1986). Gender and helping behavior: A meta-analytic review of the social psychological literature. Psychological Bulletin, 100(3), 283–308. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.100.3.283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (2013). The nature–nurture debates: 25 years of challenges in understanding the psychology of gender. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(3), 340–357. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691613484767.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., Wood, W., & Diekman, A. B. (2000). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. In T. Eckes & H. M. Trautner (Eds.), The developmental social psychology of gender (pp. 123–174). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., Wood, W., & Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C. (2004). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: Implications for the partner preferences of women and men. In A. H. Eagly, A. E. Beall, & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The psychology of gender (pp. 269–295). New York: Guilford Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebata, A. T., & Moos, R. H. (1994). Personal, situational, and contextual correlates of coping in adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 4(1), 99–125. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327795jra0401_6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Einarsen, S. (1999). The nature and causes of bullying at work. International Journal of Manpower, 20(1/2), 16–27. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437729910268588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Einarsen, S. (2000). Harassment and bullying at work: A review of the Scandinavian approach. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 5(4), 379–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-1789(98)00043-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Einarsen, S., & Mikkelsen, E. G. (2003). Individual effects of exposure to bullying at work. In S. Einarsen, H. Hoel, D. Zapf, & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Bullying and emotional abuse in the workplace: International perspectives in research and practice (pp. 127–145). London: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Einarsen, S., & Raknes, B. I. (1997). Harassment in the workplace and the victimization of men. Violence and Victims, 12(3), 247–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Einarsen, S., Raknes, B. I., Matthiesen, S. B., & Hellesøy, O. H. (1994a). Mobbing og harde personkonflikter. Helsefarlig samspill på arbeidsplassen [bullying and severe interpersonal conflicts: Unhealthy interaction at work]. Søreidgrend: Sigma Forlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Einarsen, S., Raknes, B. I., & Matthiesen, S. B. (1994b). Bullying and harassment at work and their relationships to work environment quality: An exploratory study. European Work & Organizational Psychologist, 4, 381–401. https://doi.org/10.1080/13594329408410497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Einarsen, S., Raknes, B. I., Matthiesen, S. B., & Hellesøy, O. H. (1996). Helsemessige aspekter ved mobbing i arbeidslivet. Modererende effekter av sosial støtte og personlighet [The health-related aspects of bullying in the workplace: The moderating effects of social support and personality]. Nordisk Psykologi, 48(2), 116–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/00291463.1996.11863874.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Einarsen, S., Hoel, H., Zapf, D., & Cooper, C. L. (Eds.). (2003). Bullying and emotional abuse in the workplace: International perspectives in research and practice. London: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Einarsen, S., Hoel, H., Zapf, D., & Cooper, C. (Eds.). (2011a). Bullying and harassment in the workplace: Developments in theory, research, and practice (2nd ed.). Boca Raton: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Einarsen, S., Hoel, H., Zapf, D., & Cooper, C. L. (2011b). The concept of bullying and harassment at work: The European tradition. In S. Einarsen, H. Hoel, D. Zapf, & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Bullying and harassment in the workplace: Developments in theory, research, and practice (pp. 3–39). Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Einarsen, S., Skogstad, A., Rørvik, E., Lande, Å. B., & Nielsen, M. B. (2016). Climate for conflict management, exposure to workplace bullying and work engagement: A moderated mediation analysis. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2016.1164216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Einarsen, K., Mykletun, R. J., Einarsen, S. V., Skogstad, A., & Salin, D. (2017). Ethical infrastructure and successful handling of workplace bullying. Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.18291/njwls.v7i1.81398.

  • Emdad, R., Alipour, A., Hagberg, J., & Jensen, I. B. (2012). The impact of bystanding to workplace bullying on symptoms of depression among women and men in industry in Sweden: An empirical and theoretical longitudinal study. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 86, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-012-0813-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, R. M. (1962). Power-dependence relations. American Sociological Review, 27, 31–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T. (1999). Values, achievement, and justice: Studies in the psychology of deservingness. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N., McKee, I., & Bekker, N. (2011). Deservingness and emotions: Testing a structural model that relates discrete emotions to the perceived deservingness of positive or negative outcomes. Motivation & Emotion, 35(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-011-9202-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiala, S. E., Giuliano, T. A., Remlinger, N. M., & Braithwaite, L. C. (1999). Lending a helping hand: The effects of gender stereotypes and gender on likelihood of helping. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29(10), 2164–2176. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1999.tb02300.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, P., Krueger, J. I., Greitemeyer, T., Vogrincic, C., Kastenmüller, A., Frey, D., Heene, M., Wicher, M., & Kainbacher, M. (2011). The bystander-effect: A meta-analytic review on bystander intervention in dangerous and non-dangerous emergencies. Psychological Bulletin, 137(4), 517–537. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023304.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Folger, R., & Skarlicki, D. P. (2005). Beyond counterproductive work behavior: Moral emotions and deontic retaliation versus reconciliation. In S. Fox, P. E. Spector, S. Fox, & P. E. Spector (Eds.), Counterproductive work behavior: Investigations of actors and targets (pp. 83–105). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Folkman, S., Lazarus, R. S., Gruen, R. J., & DeLongis, A. (1986). Appraisal, coping, health status, and psychological symptoms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(3), 571–579. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.50.3.571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, M. T., Agosta, J. P., Huang, J., & Shannon, C. (2017). Moral emotions toward others at work and implications for employee behavior: A qualitative analysis using critical incidents. Journal of Business and Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-016-9484-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, S., & Stallworth, L. E. (2005). Racial/ethnic bullying: Exploring links between bullying and racism in the US workplace. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66(3), 438–456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2004.01.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • French, B., & Raven, J. R. P. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in social power (pp. 150–167). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gini, G., Albiero, P., Benelli, B., & Altoè, G. (2008). Determinants of adolescents’ active defending and passive bystanding behavior in bullying. Journal of Adolescence, 31(1), 93–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2007.05.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Glasø, L., Vie, T. L., Holmdal, G. R., & Einarsen, S. (2011). An application of affective events theory to workplace bullying: The role of emotions, trait anxiety, and trait anger. European Psychologist, 16(3), 198–208. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groeblinghoff, D., & Becker, M. (1996). A case study of mobbing and the clinical treatment of mobbing victims. European Journal of Work & Organizational Psychology, 5(2), 277. https://doi.org/10.1080/13594329608414859.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hellemans, C., Dal Cason, D., & Casini, A. (2017). Bystander helping behavior in response to workplace bullying. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 76(4), 135–144. https://doi.org/10.1024/1421-0185/a000200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hershcovis, M. S., & Reich, T. C. (2013). Integrating workplace aggression research: Relational, contextual, and method considerations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34, S26–S42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hershcovis, M. S., Reich, T. C., Parker, S. K., & Bozeman, J. (2012). The relationship between workplace aggression and target deviant behaviour: The moderating roles of power and task interdependence. Work & Stress, 26(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2012.660770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hershcovis, M. S., Neville, L., Reich, T. C., Christie, A. M., Cortina, L. M., & Shan, J. V. (2017a). Witnessing wrongdoing: The effects of observer power on incivility intervention in the workplace. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 142, 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2017.07.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hershcovis, M. S., Ogunfowora, B., Reich, T. C., & Christie, A. M. (2017b). Targeted workplace incivility: The roles of belongingness, embarrassment, and power. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(7), 1057–1075. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoel, H., & Beale, D. (2006). Workplace bullying, psychological perspectives and industrial relations: Towards a contextualized and interdisciplinary approach. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 44(2), 239–262. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8543.2006.00496.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoel, H., & Cooper, C. (2000). Destructive conflict and bullying at work. Manchester: Manchester School of Management UMIST. Retrieved from http://www.adapttech.it/old/files/document/19764Destructiveconfl.pdf

  • Hoel, H., & Giga, S. I. (2006). Destructive interpersonal conflict in the workplace: The effectiveness of management interventions. Manchester: British Occupational Health Research Foundation (BOHRF) and Manchester Business School, The University of Manchester. Retrieved from www.bohrf.org.uk/downloads/bullyrpt.pdf

  • Hoel, H., Cooper, C. L., & Faragher, B. (2001). The experience of bullying in Great Britain: The impact of organizational status. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 10, 443–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoel, H., Einarsen, S., & Cooper, C. (2003). Organizational effects of bullying. In S. Einarsen, H. Hoel, D. Zapf, & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Bullying and emotional abuse in the workplace: International perspectives in research and practice (pp. 145–163). London: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoel, H., Sheehan, M. J., Cooper, C. L., & Einarsen, S. (2011). Organizational effects of workplace bullying. In S. Einarsen, H. Hoel, D. Zapf, & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Bullying and harassment in the workplace: Developments in theory, research, and practice (pp. 129–149). Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogh, A., & Dofradottir, A. (2001). Coping with bullying in the workplace. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 10(4), 485–495. https://doi.org/10.1080/13594320143000825.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogh, A., Mikkelsen, E. G., & Hansen, A. M. (2011). Individual consequences of workplace bullying/mobbing. In S. Einarsen, H. Hoel, D. Zapf, & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Bullying and harassment in the workplace: Developments in theory, research, and practice (pp. 107–129). Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogh, A., Conway, P. M., & Mikkelsen, E. G. (2017). Prevalence and risk factors for workplace bullying. In P. Sturmey (Ed.), The Wiley handbook of violence and aggression (Societal interventions, Vol. 3). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holfeld, B. (2014). Perceptions and attributions of bystanders to cyber bullying. Computers in Human Behavior, 38, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.05.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Illing, J., Carter, M., Thompson, N. J., Crampton, P. E. S., Morrow, G. M., Howse, J. H., Cooke, A., & Burford, B. C. (2013). Evidence synthesis on the occurrence, causes, consequences, prevention and management of bullying and harassing behaviours to inform decision-making in the NHS (Project report). London: Durham University. Retrieved from http://dro.dur.ac.uk/10533/

  • Keashly, L. (2001). Interpersonal and systemic aspects of emotional abuse at work: The target’s perspective. Violence and Victims, 16(3), 233–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keashly, L., & Neuman, J. H. (2004). Bullying in the workplace. Its impact and management. Employee Rights and Employment Policy Journal, 8(2), 335–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keashly, L., Trott, V., & MacLean, L. M. (1994). Abusive behavior in the workplace: A preliminary investigation. Violence and Victims, 9(4), 341–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Anderson, C. (2003). Power, approach, and inhibition. Psychological Review, 110, 265–284. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.110.2.265.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kiewitz, C., Restubog, S. L. D., Shoss, M. K., Garcia, P. R. J. M., & Tang, R. L. (2016). Suffering in silence: Investigating the role of fear in the relationship between abusive supervision and defensive silence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(5), 731–742. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000074.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kirby, R., & Corzine, J. (1981). The contagion of stigma: Fieldwork among deviants. Qualitative Sociology, 4(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00987041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulik, C., Bainbridge, H., & Cregan, C. (2008). Known by the company we keep: Stigma-by-association effects in the workplace. Academy of Management Review, 33(1), 216–230. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2008.27752765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lansbury, L. (2014). The development, measurement and implementation of a bystander intervention strategy: A field study on workplace verbal bullying in a large UK organisation. PhD, Doctoral dissertation, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth. Retrieved from https://core.ac.uk/display/77050198

  • Latané, B., & Darley, J. M. (1970). The unresponsive bystander: Why doesn’t he help? Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • León-Pérez, J. M., Arenas, A., & Griggs, T. B. (2012). Effectiveness of conflict management training to prevent workplace bullying. In N. Tehrani & N. Tehrani (Eds.), Workplace bullying: Symptoms and solutions (pp. 230–243). New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science: Selected theoretical papers. Oxford, UK: Harpers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, S. E., & Orford, J. (2005). Women’s experiences of workplace bullying: Changes in social relationships. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 15(1), 29–47. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.807.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D., & Sheehan, M. J. (2003). Introduction: Workplace bullying: Theoretical and practical approaches to a management challenge. International Journal of Management and Decision Making, 4(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1081/DMR-120018245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leymann, H. (1988). Ingen annan utväg: Om utslagning och självmord som följd av mobbning i arbetslivet [No other way: About social exclusion and suicide as a result of bullying at work]. Stockholm: Wahlström and Widstrand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leymann, H. (1990). Mobbing and psychological terror at workplaces. Violence and Victims, 5(2), 119–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leymann, H. (1996). The content and development of mobbing at work. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5(2), 165–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/13594329608414853.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linstead, S. (2013). Organizational bystanding: Whistleblowing, watching the work go by or aiding and abetting? M@n@gement, 16(5), 680–696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Løgstrup, K. E., & Fink, H. (1997). The ethical demand. Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lutgen-Sandvik, P. (2008). Intensive remedial identity work: Responses to workplace bullying trauma and stigmatization. Organization, 15(1), 97–119. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508407084487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lutgen-Sandvik, P., & Fletcher, C. V. (2013). Conflict motivations and tactics of targets, bystanders, and bullies: A thrice-told tale of workplace bullying. In J. Oetzel & S. Ting-Toomey (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of conflict communication (pp. 349–377). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lutgen-Sandvik, P., & McDermott, V. (2011). Making sense of supervisory bullying: Perceived powerlessness, empowered possibilities. Southern Communication Journal, 76(4), 342–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/10417941003725307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lutgen-Sandvik, P., Tracy, S. J., & Alberts, J. K. (2007). Burned by bullying in the American workplace: Prevalence, perception, degree and impact. Journal of Management Studies, 44(6), 837–862.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macháčková, H., Dedkova, L., Sevcikova, A., & Cerna, A. (2013). Bystanders’ support of cyberbullied schoolmates. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 23(1), 25–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maines, B., & Robinson, G. (1998). The no blame approach to bullying. In D. Shorrocks-Taylor (Ed.), Directions in educational psychology (pp. 281–295). Philadelphia: Whurr Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthiesen, S. B., & Einarsen, S. (2007). Perpetrators and targets of bullying at work: Role stress and individual differences. Violence and Victims, 22, 735–753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthiesen, S. B., Raknes, B. I., & Røkkum, O. (1989). Mobbing på arbeidsplassen [Bullying at the worksite]. Tidsskrift for Norsk Psykologforening, 26(11), 761–774.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthiesen, S. B., Aasen, E., Holst, G., Wie, K., & Einarsen, S. (2003). The escalation of conflict: A case study of bullying at work. International Journal of Management and Decision Making, 4(1), 96–112. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMDM.2003.002491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, P., & Flood, M. (2012). Encourage. Support, Act! Bystander approaches to sexual harassment in the workplace. Retrieved from www.humanrights.gov.au/sexualharassment/bystanders-paper/

  • McKay, R. B. (2014). Confronting workplace bullying: Agency and structure in the Royal Canadian Mounted Police. Administration & Society, 46(5), 548–572. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399713509245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikkelsen, E. G., & Einarsen, S. (2001). Bullying in Danish work-life: Prevalence and health correlates. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 10(4), 393–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/13594320143000816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikkelsen, E. G., Hogh, A., & Puggaard, L. (2011). Prevention of bullying and conflicts at work: Process factors influencing the implementation and effects of interventions. International Journal of Workplace Health Management, 4(1), 84–100. https://doi.org/10.1108/17538351111118617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikkelsen, E. G., Holmegaard, T. R., & Hogh, A. (2016, April 20–22). Prevention of bullying at work: Evaluation of a dialogue-based intervention. Paper presented at the 10th international conference on workplace bullying and harassment, Auckland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, M. S., Vogel, R. M., & Folger, R. (2015). Third parties’ reactions to the abusive supervision of coworkers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(4), 1040–1055. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mulder, R. (2015). Workplace mobbing: Toward a better understanding of bystander behavior. PhD, Open University of the Netherlands, Heerlen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulder, R., Pouwelse, M., Lodewijkx, H., & Bolman, C. (2008). Emoties en de intentie tot helpen van omstanders bij pesten op het werk: de invloed van waargenomen verantwoordelijkheid en besmettingsdreiging [Emotions and bystanders’ help intention at workplace mobbing: The influence of perceived responsibility and threat of contagion]. Gedrag en Organisatie, 21, 19–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulder, R., Pouwelse, M., Lodewijkx, H., & Bolman, C. (2014). Workplace mobbing and bystanders’ helping behaviour towards victims: The role of gender, perceived responsibility and anticipated stigma by association. International Journal of Psychology, 49(4), 304–312. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12018.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mulder, R., Pouwelse, M., Lodewijkx, H., Bos, A. E. R., & van Dam, K. (2016). Predictors of antisocial and prosocial behaviour of bystanders in workplace mobbing. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 26(3), 207–220. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulder, R., Bos, A. E., Pouwelse, M., & van Dam, K. (2017). Workplace mobbing: How the victim’s coping behavior influences bystander responses. Journal of Social Psychology, 157(1), 16–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2016.1152213.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Namie, G., & Lutgen-Sandvik, P. E. (2010). Active and passive accomplices: The communal character of workplace bullying. International Journal of Communication, 4, 343–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuberg, S. L., Smith, D., Hoffman, J. C., & Russell, F. J. (1994). When we observe stigmatized and ‘normal’ individuals interacting: Stigma by association. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20(2), 196–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167294202007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neuman, J. H., & Baron, R. A. (2011). Social antecedents of bullying: A social interactionist perspective. In S. Einarsen, H. Hoel, D. Zapf, & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Bullying and harassment in the workplace: Developments in theory, research, and practice (pp. 201–226). Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niedhammer, I., David, S., & Degioanni, S. (2006). Association between workplace bullying and depressive symptoms in the French working population. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 61(2), 251–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2006.03.051.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Niedl, K. (1995). Mobbing/Bullying am Arbeitsplatz. Eine empirische Analyse zum Phänomen sowie zu personalwirtschaftlich relevanten Effekten von systematischen Feindseligkeiten. Zeitschrift Für Personalforschung/German Journal of Research in Human Resource Management, 9(3), 297–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niedl, K. (1996). Mobbing and well-being: Economic and personnel development implications. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5(2), 239–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/13594329608414857.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, M. B., & Einarsen, S. (2012). Outcomes of exposure to workplace bullying: A meta-analytic review. Work & Stress, 26(4), 309–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2012.734709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, K., & Miraglia, M. (2017). What works for whom in which circumstances? On the need to move beyond the ‘what works?’ Question in organizational intervention research. Human Relations, 70(1), 40–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726716670226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, M., Notelaers, G., & Einarsen, S. (2011). Measuring exposure to workplace bullying. In S. Einarsen, H. Hoel, D. Zapf, & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Bullying and harassment in the workplace: Developments in theory, research, and practice (pp. 149–177). Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connell, P., Pepler, D., & Craig, W. (1999). Peer involvement in bullying: Insights and challenges for intervention. Journal of Adolescence, 22(4), 437–452. https://doi.org/10.1006/jado.1999.0238.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly, J., & Aquino, K. (2011). A model of third parties’ morally motivated responses to mistreatment in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 36(3), 526–543. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2011.61031810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olafsson, R., & Johannsdottir, H. (2004). Coping with bullying in the workplace: The effect of gender, age and type of bullying. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 32, 319–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069880410001723549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parzefall, M.-R., & Salin, D. M. (2010). Perceptions of and reactions to workplace bullying: A social exchange perspective. Human Relations, 63, 761–780. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726709345043.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paull, M., Omari, M., & Standen, P. (2012). When is a bystander not a bystander? A typology of the roles of bystanders in workplace bullying. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 50, 351–366. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7941.2012.00027.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pihl, P., Albertsen, K., Hogh, A., & Andersen, L. P. S. (2017). Social capital and workplace bullying. Work: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment and Rehabilitation, 57(4), 535–545. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-172589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piotrowski, C. (2012). From workplace bullying to cyberbullying: The enigma of e-harassment in modern organizations. Organization Development Journal, 30(4), 44–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanin, J. R., Espelage, D. L., & Pigott, T. D. (2012). A meta-analysis of school-based bullying prevention programs’ effects on bystander intervention behavior. School Psychology Review, 41(1), 47–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Privitera, C., & Campbell, M. A. (2009). Cyberbullying: The new face of workplace bullying? Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 12(4), 395–400. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2009.0025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pryor, J. B., Reeder, G. D., & Monroe, A. E. (2012). The infection of bad company: Stigma by association. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(2), 224–241. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026270.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Quine, L. (1999). Workplace bullying in NHS community trust: Staff questionnaire survey. British Medical Journal, 318(7178), 228–232. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.318.7178.228.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rayner, C. (1997). The incidence of workplace bullying. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 7, 199–208. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1298(199706)7:3<199::AID-CASP418>3.0.CO;2-H.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rayner, C. (1999). From research to implementation: Finding leverage for prevention. International Journal of Manpower, 20(1/2), 28. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437729910268614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rayner, C., & Cooper, C. (1997). Workplace bullying: Myth or reality—Can we afford to ignore it? Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 18(4), 211–214. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437739710182313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rayner, C., Sheehan, M., & Barker, M. (1999). Theoretical approaches to the study of bullying at work. International Journal of Manpower, 20(1/2), 11–16. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437729910268579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rayner, C., Hoel, H., & Cooper, C. (2001). Workplace bullying: What we know, who is to blame and what can we do? London: Taylor & Francis.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Reich, T. C., & Hershcovis, M. S. (2015). Observing workplace incivility. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(1), 203–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036464.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reknes, I., Einarsen, S., Pallesen, S., Bjorvatn, B., Moen, B. E., & Mageroy, N. (2016). Exposure to bullying behaviors at work and subsequent symptoms of anxiety: The moderating role of individual coping style. Industrial Health, 54(5), 421–432. https://doi.org/10.2486/indhealth.2015-0196.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, S., & Cohen, L. J. (1986). Approach, avoidance, and coping with stress. American Psychologist, 41(7), 813–819. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.41.7.813.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Salin, D. (2001). Prevalence and forms of bullying among business professionals: A comparison of two different strategies for measuring bullying. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 10(4), 425–441. https://doi.org/10.1080/13594320143000771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salin, D. (2011). The significance of gender for third parties’ perceptions of negative interpersonal behaviour: Labelling and explaining negative acts. Gender, Work and Organization, 18(6), 571–591. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0432.2009.00465.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salin, D., & Hoel, H. (2011). Organizational causes of workplace bullying. In S. Einarsen, H. Hoel, D. Zapf, & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Bullying and harassment in the workplace: Developments in theory, research, and practice (pp. 227–243). Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salin, D., & Notelaers, G. (2018). The effects of workplace bullying on witnesses: Violation of the psychological contract as an explanatory mechanism? The International Journal of Human Resource Management. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2018.1443964.

  • Salmivalli, C. (1999). Participant role approach to school bullying: Implications for interventions. Journal of Adolescence, 22(4), 453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salmivalli, C., Lagerspetz, K., Björkqvist, K., Österman, K., & Kaukiainen, A. (1996). Bullying as a group process: Participant roles and their relations to social status within the group. Aggressive Behavior, 22(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2337(1996)22:1<1::AID-AB1>3.0.CO;2-T.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salmivalli, C., Lappalainen, M., & Lagerspetz, K. M. J. (1998). Stability and change of behavior in connection with bullying in schools: A two-year follow-up. Aggressive Behavior, 24(3), 205–218. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2337(1998)24:3<205::AID-AB5>3.0.CO;2-J.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salmivalli, C., Kärnä, A., & Poskiparta, E. (2011). Counteracting bullying in Finland: The KiVa program and its effects on different forms of being bullied. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 35(5), 405–411. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025411407457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samnani, A. K. (2013). “Is this bullying?” Understanding target and witness reactions. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 28(3), 290–305. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683941311321196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samnani, A.-K., Boekhorst, J. A., & Harrison, J. A. (2016). Institutional-level bullying: Exploring workplace bullying during union organizing drives. Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology, 89(2), 377–395. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schreurs, K. M. G., & de Ridder, D. T. D. (1997). Integration of coping and social support perspectives: Implications for the study of adaptation to chronic diseases. Clinical Psychology Review, 17(1), 89–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7358(96)00050-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzer, R., & Weiner, B. (1991). Stigma controllability and coping as predictors of emotions and social support. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 8, 133–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407591081007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scully, M., & Rowe, M. (2009). Bystander training within organizations. Journal of the International Ombudsman Association, 2(1), 89–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shallcross, L., Ramsay, S., & Barker, M. (2013). Severe workplace conflict: The experience of mobbing. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 6(3), 191–213. https://doi.org/10.1111/ncmr.12011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharp, S. (1996). The role of peers in tackling bullying in schools. Educational Psychology in Practice, 11(4), 17–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/0266736960110404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silver, R. C., Wortman, C. B., & Crofton, C. (1990). The role of coping in support provision: The self-presentational dilemma of victims of life crises. In B. R. Sarason, I. G. Sarason, & G. R. Pierce (Eds.), Social support: An interactional view (pp. 397–426). Oxford, UK: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skarlicki, D. P., & Rupp, D. E. (2010). Dual processing and organizational justice: The role of rational versus experiential processing in third-party reactions to workplace mistreatment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(5), 944–952. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020468.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. K. (1997). Bullying in life-span perspective: What can studies of school bullying and workplace bullying learn from each other? Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 7(3), 249–255. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1298(199706)7:3<249::AID-CASP425>3.0.CO;2-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stagg, S. J., Sheridan, D., Jones, R. A., & Speroni, K. G. (2013). Workplace bullying: The effectiveness of a workplace program. Workplace Health and Safety, 61(8), 333–338.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Suler, J. (2004). The online disinhibition effect. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 7(3), 321–326. https://doi.org/10.1089/1094931041291295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swan, S. L. (2015). Bystander interventions. Wisconsin Law Review, 2015, 975–1047. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=buh&AN=112012985&site=ehost-live. SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2643030

  • Taylor, S. E., Klein, L. C., Lewis, B. P., Gruenewald, T. L., Gurung, R. A. R., & Updegraff, J. A. (2000). Biobehavioral responses to stress in females: Tend-and-befriend, not fight-or-flight. Psychological Review, 107(3), 411–429. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.107.3.411.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thylefors, I. (1987). Syndabockar. Om utstötning och mobbning i arbetslivet [Scapegoats. On exclusion and mobbing at work]. Stockholm: Natur och Kultur.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ttofi, M. M., & Farrington, D. P. (2011). Effectiveness of school-based programs to reduce bullying: A systematic and meta-analytic review. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 7(1), 27–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-010-9109-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Twemlow, S. W. (1999). A psychoanalytic dialectical model for sexual and other forms of workplace harassment. Journal of Applied Psychoanalytic Studies, 1, 249–270. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1023204431730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Twemlow, S. W., Fonagy, P., & Sacco, F. C. (2004). The role of the bystander in the social architecture of bullying and violence in schools and communities. Annals New York Academy of Sciences, 1036, 215–232. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1330.014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tye-Williams, S., & Krone, K. J. (2015). Chaos, reports, and quests: Narrative agency and co-workers in stories of workplace bullying. Management Communication Quarterly, 29(1), 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318914552029.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Vliert, E., Einarsen, S., & Nielsen, M. (2013). Are national levels of employee harassment cultural covariations of climato-economic conditions? Work & Stress, 27(1), 106–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2013.760901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Heugten, K. (2011). Theorizing active bystanders as change agents in workplace bullying of social workers. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 92(2), 219–224. https://doi.org/10.1606/1044-3894.4090.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vartia, M. (1996). The sources of bullying–psychological work environment and organizational climate. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5(2), 203–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/13594329608414855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vartia, M. A. (2001). Consequences of workplace bullying with respect to the well-being of its targets and the observers of bullying. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 27, 63–69. https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vranjes, I., Baillien, E., Vandebosch, H., Erreygers, S., & De Witte, H. (2017). The dark side of working online: Towards a definition and an emotion reaction model of workplace cyberbullying. Computers in Human Behavior, 69, 324–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.055.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B. (2006). Social motivation, justice, and the moral emotions. An attributional approach. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Ass.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B., Perry, R. P., & Magnusson, J. (1988). An attributional analysis of reactions to stigmas. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55(5), 738–748. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.55.5.738.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zapf, D. (1999). Organisational, work group related and personal causes of mobbing/bullying at work. International Journal of Manpower, 20(1–2), 70–85. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437729910268669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zapf, D., & Gross, C. (2001). Conflict escalation and coping with workplace bullying: A replication and extension. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 10(4), 497–522. https://doi.org/10.1080/13594320143000834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zapf, D., Knorz, C., & Kulla, M. (1996). On the relationship between mobbing factors, and job content, social work environment, and health outcomes. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5, 215–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/13594329608414856.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Mieneke Pouwelse or Roelie Mulder .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Pouwelse, M., Mulder, R., Mikkelsen, E.G. (2018). The Role of Bystanders in Workplace Bullying: An Overview of Theories and Empirical Research. In: D'Cruz, P., et al. Pathways of Job-related Negative Behaviour. Handbooks of Workplace Bullying, Emotional Abuse and Harassment, vol 2. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6173-8_14-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6173-8_14-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-6173-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-6173-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics