Abstract
Poly (amidoamine) (PAMAM) dendrimers are a class of highly branched, monodispersed, synthetic macromolecules with abundant terminal functional groups, and have significant advantages over other cationic polymers as gene delivery vectors due to their well-defined structure, the possibility of facile surface modification, and capacity of carrying large gene segments. The surface amine groups of dendrimers can be conjugated with functional molecules (e.g., hydrophobic moieties, β-cyclodextrin, polyethylene glycol, etc.), and targeting ligands (e.g., folic acid, arginine-glycine-aspartic peptide), while the unique interior of dendrimers affords their uses to form dendrimer-entrapped gold nanoparticles. These modifications render the dendrimer-based vectors with an ability for targeted and enhanced gene delivery, including pDNA and siRNA delivery. In this chapter, we review some recent advances made in multifunctional poly(amidoamine) dendrimer-based nanoparticles for gene delivery applications.
Access provided by CONRICYT-eBooks. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
1 Introduction
Gene therapy has been considered as a promising approach for cancer therapy due to the fact that exogenous therapeutic genes are able to be delivered to target cells to correct or compensate the genetic defect and abnormality [1,2,3]. The common method of gene therapy including plasmid DNA (pDNA) therapy and small interfering RNA (siRNA) therapy have been intensively studied in treating serious diseases such as cancer and genetic disorders [4, 5]. The foreign gene segments or siRNA delivered into cells could express normal proteins and repair cell defects [4, 6], or destroy the function of cognate mRNA and knockdown the expression of disease-causing proteins, respectively [7, 8]. Although the pDNA and siRNA have been used in gene therapy, the easy enzymatic degradation and limited cell membrane permeability of naked pDNA and siRNA have seriously restricted their in vivo therapeutic applications [9,10,11]. The success of gene therapy is largely dependent on the development of an ideal delivery system that can selectively and efficiently deliver genetic materials to target cells without causing any associated pathogenic effects [12, 13]. Therefore, the main issue of gene therapy is not the cellular expression of an exogenous gene itself, but the development of safe and efficient gene delivery systems [14].
It is well known that the gene delivery systems include both viral and nonviral vector systems, and viral vectors usually exhibit high transfection efficiency [15]. However, the safety problems raised by the toxicity, oncogenicity, and immunogenicity of the viral vectors greatly hamper their routine use in both basic research laboratories and clinical settings [16,17,18,19]. Hence, nonviral delivery systems have continuously received considerable attention because they can be structurally varied, are relatively safe, and have an ability to carry large and diverse genetic materials into cells [14]. Cationic polymers are the commonly used nonviral gene vectors that have been extensively investigated due to their synthetic controllability and multivalent-functionalized surface amine groups, as well as their ability to compact nucleic acid [14, 20,21,22]. Recent advances in pDNA and siRNA delivery systems including cationic poly-l-lysine, polyethylenimine, diethylaminoethyl-dextran, and chitosan have been proven to be able to transfect genes to different cell lines [21, 23, 24].
Poly(amidoamine) (PAMAM) dendrimers are a class of high branched synthetic macromolecules with narrow molecular weight (Mw) distribution and easily functionalized amine-terminated surface [25,26,27]. These structural features make PAMAM dendrimer a promising candidate as pDNA or siRNA vector, especially the abundant surface amine groups render PAMAM dendrimers with a strong capacity in compressing pDNA or siRNA to form polyplexes [28,29,30,31]. However, some obstacles such as transient gene expression, low transfection efficiency, and high cytotoxicity limit their practical applications [23]. Much effort has been devoted to enhance their gene delivery efficiency and specificity while simultaneously decreasing their cytotoxicity. It has been reported that partial PEGylation [32,33,34,35], acetylation [36], alkylation [37, 38], and peptide-conjugation [39, 40] of PAMAM dendrimers can greatly enhance their gene delivery efficiency or specificity, and reduce their cytotoxicity. Therefore, through appropriate surface functionalization of dendrimers, a highly efficient and less toxic nonviral gene delivery vector may be developed for various biomedical applications [41,42,43]. The aim of this chapter is to give an overview of the recent advances related to the design of functional dendrimer-based vector systems for gene delivery applications.
2 Alkylated PAMAM Dendrimers for Gene Delivery
In order to improve the cellular uptake of materials, hydrophobic modification on the surface of dendrimers appears to be crucial, which helps cross the lipid bilayer on the cell surface, thus realizing the safe and efficient delivery of gene. In our previous report, we synthesized hydrophobically modified PAMAM dendrimers by partially reacting the periphery dendrimer amines with 1, 2-epoxyhexane or 1, 2-epoxydodecane [44]. The formed hydrophobically modified generation 5 (G5) dendrimers (denoted as G5.NH2–C6 or G5.NH2–C12) were used to complex two different plasmid DNAs (pDNAs) encoding luciferase (Luc) and enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP), respectively, for gene transfection studies.
Cytotoxicity assay data reveal that at a relatively high concentration (above 2000 nM), the cytotoxicity of the vectors follows the order of G5.NH2–C12 > G5.NH2–C6 > G5.NH2. This is likely due to the fact that at a relatively high concentration, the hydrophobic long alkyl chain of dendrimers is able to strongly interact with the hydrophobic cell membrane, thereby enhancing the hole formation on the cell membranes [45].
Subsequently, both Luc and EGFP gene expression assays were used to investigate the gene transfection efficiency of G5 dendrimers in HeLa cells (a human cervical carcinoma cell line). The results showed that in all cases, the Luc gene transfection efficiency decreased with the N/P ratio. And all dendrimeric vectors possessed much higher gene transfection efficiency at the studied N/P ratios than the control cells without transfection treatment and cells transfected with naked pDNA. Under the N/P ratio of 2.5 and 5, the Luc gene transfection efficiency followed the order of G5.NH2–C12 > G5.NH2–C6 > G5.NH2. In particular, at an N/P ratio of 1, the Luc expression value of G5.NH2-C12 was around four times higher than that of G5.NH2, also much higher than that of the commercial lipofectamine 2000 vector. This suggests that the partial hydrophobic modification of G5 dendrimers enables an enhanced interaction between the vector and cell membrane, thereby significantly enhancing the gene delivery efficiency, in agreement with the literature [37]. However, when compared to the work reported by Santos et al. [37], where the higher gene delivery efficiency was shown by the vectors containing the shortest hydrophobic chains (12 versus 14 or 16 carbon alkyl chains), in this study we show that the gene delivery efficiency of the G5.NH2–C12 dendrimers is much higher than that of the G5.NH2–C6 dendrimers. The trend was apparently reversed, although the used numbers of carbon alkyl chains were different.
The gene transfection efficiency of the hydrophobically modified G5 dendrimers was further qualitatively assessed by confocal microscopic imaging of the EGFP gene expression in HeLa cells. At the N/P ratio of 1, all vectors have better gene transfection efficiency than at other N/P ratios. These results were consistent with the Luc assay data. Taken together, both quantitative Luc assay and qualitative EGFP expression confirmed the potential to use both G5.NH2–C6 and G5.NH2–C12 dendrimers as vectors for gene delivery applications. Our results suggest that partial modification of G5 dendrimers with hydrophobic alkyl chains might be an alternative approach to develop dendrimer-based nonviral vectors for enhanced gene delivery applications.
3 Au DNEPs for Gene Delivery
Gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) have been identified as a suitable platform for drug/gene delivery due to their unique physicochemical properties, such as size- and shape-dependent optical properties, high surface area to volume ratio, and rich surface chemistry allowing for facile modification with different functionalities [46,47,48,49,50,51,52]. Functional AuNPs delivery vehicles, with a positively charged surface, can be used to compress negatively charged genetic materials such as plasmid DNA (pDNA) [42, 53,54,55,56] and siRNA [57,58,59,60,61]. It has been reported that lysine dendron-functionalized AuNPs are 28-fold superior to polylysine in reporter gene expression [62]. The super gene transfection performance of the lysine dendron-functionalized AuNPs is likely due to the biomimetic design of the particles that has a size more or less similar to the nucleosome core proteins (~6 nm) having a large proportion of basic residues (lysine and arginine) that form electrostatic bonding with the phosphate backbone of DNA [63]. In our previous work [42], we designed the use of dendrimer-entrapped Au NPs (Au DENPs) for enhanced gene delivery. The advantages of the Au NP entrapment within the dendrimer interior stem from two aspects: (1) the entrapped AuNPs are able to neutralize some of the dendrimer terminal amines due to the amine stabilization of AuNPs, decreasing the dendrimer cytotoxicity; and (2) the existence of AuNPs helps to reserve the three-dimensional (3-D) spherical shape of dendrimers, thereby significantly improving the DNA or siRNA compaction ability of the dendrimers.
To prove our above hypothesis, amine-terminated G5 PAMAM dendrimers (G5.NH2) were used as templates to synthesize AuNPs with different Au atom/dendrimer molar ratios (25:1, 50:1, 75:1, and 100:1, respectively) [42] (Scheme 12.1). For simplicity, the G5.NH2 dendrimers were denoted as S0, while the Au DENPs with the Au atom/dendrimer molar ratio at 25:1, 50:1, 75:1, and 100:1 were denoted as S25, S50, S75, and S100, respectively, in the naming system.
The gene transfection efficiency of the Au DENP vectors was investigated using firefly Luc gene expression (Fig. 12.1). The gene transfection efficiency is dependent on both the composition of the used Au DENP vectors prepared with different Au atom/dendrimer molar ratios and the selected N/P ratios. The most efficient vector is S25 that has its peak value at an N/P ratio of 2.5:1 for all three different cell lines. For COS-7 cells, the Luc expression reaches 4.27 × 106 RLU/mg protein, while the Luc expression is only 3.42 × 104 RLU/mg protein using S0 as a vector. It appears that at the N/P ratio of 2.5:1, the Luc gene transfection efficiency of the S25 vector is almost 125 times higher than that of the S0 vector. For the other cell lines, at the same N/P ratio, the relative Luc expressed using S25 as a vector is 153 times (for 293T cells) and 358 times (for HeLa cells) higher than that using S0 as a vector, respectively.
It is interesting to note that the gene transfection efficiency of Au DENPs is not increased with the increase of the Au atom/dendrimer molar ratio, or with the size of the AuNPs entrapped within the dendrimer templates. S25 seems to be the best vector in terms of the Luc transfection efficiency. At the N/P ratio of 2.5:1, both S25 and S50 are able to significantly enhance the gene delivery when compared with S0 without AuNPs (p < 0.01 or p < 0.001). For the Au DENPs prepared with the increased Au atom/dendrimer molar ratios, the formed AuNP cores have a larger size, which requires more dendrimer terminal amines to stabilize the AuNPs, consequently resulting in a lower binding affinity to pDNA and gene transfection efficiency than those of S25.
Surface modification of dendrimers is reported to cause significant changes in their biological properties, including cytotoxicity and the cell membrane permeation ability [64, 65]. Therefore, it is vital to confirm whether the changes of the physical shape and surface primary amine density of Au DENPs could change the transcellular pathways and localization of the vector by intracellular trafficking and colocalization assay (Fig. 12.2). In the fluorescent microscopic images of cells transfected with all Au DENPs/pDNA complexes, lysosomes were labeled by Lysotracker green (green), Cy3-labeled pDNA (red) were used to localize the polyplexes, and DAPI was used to stain the nuclei (blue). We can see that in the merged images that the polyplexes are well colocalized within the lysosomes and they are all around the nuclei after 2 h of transfection, which means that Au DENPs with different compositions follows the same way as G5.NH2 dendrimers in the intracellular trafficking pathway and fate.
Results clearly show that Au DENPs with an appropriate composition (Au atom/dendrimer molar ratio = 25:1) enable enhanced gene delivery, with a gene transfection efficiency more than 100 times higher than the G5.NH2 dendrimers without AuNPs entrapped. It is believed that the entrapment of AuNPs within dendrimer templates helps preserve 3-D spherical shape of dendrimers, enabling high compaction of DNA to form smaller particles, and consequently resulting in enhanced gene delivery. With a lower cytotoxicity of Au DENPs than that of the G5 amine dendrimers and enhanced gene delivery capability, Au DENPs may be used as a new family of gene delivery vectors for various gene therapy applications.
3.1 Acetylated Au DNEPs for Gene Delivery
In order to improve the gene delivery efficiency and lower the toxicity, much effort has been devoted to the modification of PAMAM dendrimers. The surface amine groups of dendrimers can be conjugated with hydrophilic polymers [64, 66, 67], or modified with small molecules, such as acetic anhydride [7], cell specific ligands [68], and amino acid [69,70,71]. It has been proven that after surface modification, the cytotoxicity of PAMAM dendrimers can be dramatically reduced due to the decreased density of positive charges [34, 35, 37, 38, 72]. Moreover, surface modification may impact the gene transfection efficiency of dendrimers. For example, Waite et al. showed that a modest acetylation (approximately 20%) of PAMAM dendrimers was able to maintain the siRNA delivery efficiency comparable to the unmodified dendrimers, and increased degree of acetylation resulted in the reduced siRNA delivery efficiency [31]. In addition, PAMAM dendrimers modified with l-arginine have been proven to be able to improve the gene delivery efficiency [69, 70]. These studies imply that via an appropriate surface modification, PAMAM dendrimers are able to be afforded with enhanced gene delivery efficiency and simultaneously have reduced toxicity.
Our previous work has shown that Au DENPs prepared using amine-terminated G5 PAMAM dendrimers as templates display higher gene transfection efficiency than G5 dendrimers without the entrapment of AuNPs [42]. To eliminate the possible cytotoxicity resulting from the amine groups on the surface of Au DENPs for safe gene delivery applications, here we synthesized a series of partially acetylated Au DENPs and systematically evaluated the effect of the partial acetylation on their performance in gene transfection. Although acetylation of dendrimer terminal amine groups has been proven to be an effective way to decrease the cytotoxicity of dendrimers, a high degree of acetylation modification may result in reduced gene delivery efficiency due to the decreased density of amine groups left on the dendrimer surface [31]. Therefore, the molar ratios of acetic anhydride to dendrimer were controlled in a range of 5:1–30:1.
The cytotoxicity of partially acetylated and non-acetylated Au DNEPs was evaluated by MTT viability assay of HeLa cells treated with the vectors at different concentrations. It could be seen that all vectors did not have apparent cytotoxicity at low vector concentrations (500 nM or below). With the increase of vector concentration, the cell viability gradually decreased; however, the partially acetylated Au DENPs displayed much less cytotoxicity than non-acetylated ones due to the decreased surface positive charge, in agreement with the literature [7]. We also note that at the high vector concentrations (1000–3000 nM), the cell viability increases with the acetylation degree of the Au DENPs vectors, and {(Au0)25-G5.NH2-Ac30} with the highest acetylation degree exhibits the lowest cytotoxicity at all the tested concentrations. Compared with amine-terminated {(Au0)25-G5.NH2}, {(Au0)25-G5.NH2-Ac30} caused a significant increase in cell viability at the concentration of 2000 nM (p < 0.01). At the highest vector concentration of 3000 nM, partially acetylated Au DENPs (both {(Au0)25-G5.NH2-Ac20} and {(Au0)25-G5.NH2-Ac30}) show significantly improved cell viability when compared with {(Au0)25-G5.NH2} (p < 0.01 and p < 0.001, respectively). Therefore, the partially acetylated Au DENPs show advantages over non-acetylated ones in gene delivery applications due to their relatively low cytotoxicity.
The gene transfection efficiency of the acetylated and non-acetylated Au DENP vectors was investigated by luciferase activity assay after gene expression in HeLa cells. The gene transfection efficiency is largely dependent on the selected N/P ratio, and it seems that the acetylation degree of Au DENPs did not significantly impact the gene transfection efficiency under the same N/P ratios. All vectors displayed highest Luc activity at the N/P ratio of 2.5:1, therefore this N/P ratio was selected as an optimal one for further study. We believe that the acetylated Au DENPs have advantages in gene delivery due to their less cytotoxicity. Our study suggests that under certain degree of partial acetylation, the reduced amine density on the surface of Au DENPs may slightly compromise the DNA compaction ability, but does not significantly impact the gene delivery efficiency under the optimized N/P ratio (2.5:1). The gene transfection efficiency of acetylated Au DENP vectors was further qualitatively assessed by microscopic observation of the EGFP gene expression. All Au DENPs vectors enabled high EGFP expression, corroborating the Luc activity assay results. With the proven less cytotoxicity of the partially acetylated Au DENPs than that of non-acetylated Au DENPs by cell viability assay, the developed partially acetylated Au DENPs may serve as promising vectors for safe gene delivery applications with non-compromised gene transfection efficiency.
3.2 PEGylated Au DNEPs for Gene Delivery
Polyethylene glycol (PEG) is a class of macromolecules with good biocompatibility, non-immunogenicity, and high antifouling property [72,73,74]. Previous studies have shown that surface PEGylation could enhance the gene delivery efficiency and reduce the cytotoxicity of PAMAM dendrimers [27, 66, 75]. For example, Qi et al. reported that generation 5 PAMAM (G5.NH2) or generation 6 PAMAM (G6.NH2) dendrimers partially conjugated with PEG monomethyl ether (mPEG) could dramatically facilitate intramuscular gene delivery in neonatal mice [35]. In another study, Tang et al. [27] showed that intramuscular delivery of GFP-siRNA using PEG-modified G5.NH2 dendrimers could significantly suppress the expression of EGFP gene in both transient adenovirus infected C57BL/6 mice and EGFP transgenic mice. It is believed that with the PEGylation of dendrimer periphery, both the water solubility of the polymer/DNA polyplexes and the intracellular release of DNA molecules can be enhanced, thereby resulting in enhanced gene delivery efficiency [3, 76]. In addition to the mPEG conjugation with terminal periphery amine groups of dendrimers, a rational design towards the interior space of PAMAM dendrimers is also feasible in reducing the cytotoxicity and improving the gene transfection efficiency of dendrimers [28, 42, 43]. In either case of dendrimer surface PEGylation or interior Au NP entrapment, the positive charge of the dendrimer surface amines is able to be compromised, thereby having improved cytocompatibility.
Inspired by the fact that both of the exterior modified mPEG and the interior entrapped AuNPs are able to decrease the cytotoxicity and increase the gene delivery efficiency of PAMAM dendrimers, we herein attempted to develop a unique PAMAM-based nonviral gene delivery vector by simultaneously modifying mPEG onto the dendrimer surface and entrapping AuNPs within the dendrimer interior (Scheme 12.2) [77]. The pDNA/siRNA transfection efficiency was optimized by altering the molecular weight of mPEG (Mw = 2 K or 5 K) and the gold salt/dendrimer molar ratio (25:1 or 50:1) of the Au DENPs. The partially PEGylated Au DENPs were employed to deliver Luc reporter gene, EGFP gene, or B-cell lymphoma-2 (Bcl-2) siRNA to HeLa cells in vitro. The major point of this work is to utilize Au DENPs with different PEGylation chain lengths and different Au contents to explore their efficacy in pDNA and siRNA delivery.
Similar to the previous characterization methods, the viability of cells treated with the G5.NH2 dendrimers was lower than 60% at a concentration at 3000 nM, while cells treated with the partially PEGylated Au DENPs showed a viability higher than 80% at the same concentration. DNA transfection efficiency of all vectors was investigated by Luc activity assay. Compared with HeLa cells treated with the G5.NH2 dendrimer/pDNA polyplexes or PEGylated G5.NH2 dendrimer/pDNA polyplexes, the Luc expression of HeLa cells treated with the partially PEGylated Au DENPs/pDNA polyplexes was remarkably increased (Fig. 12.3a). It could be seen that partially PEGylated Au DENPs/pDNA polyplexes showed the highest Luc expression at the N/P ratio of 5:1, and {(Au0)50-G5.NH2-mPEG2K} vector enabled the highest Luc expression within cells at various N/P ratios. At the N/P ratio of 5:1, the average light unit of {(Au0)50-G5.NH2-mPEG2K}-transfected HeLa cells was 7.39 × 107 RLU/mg protein, which was 292 times higher than that of cells transfected with the G5.NH2 dendrimers (2.53 × 105 RLU/mg protein). Therefore, the N/P ratio of 5:1 was used for further study. Undoubtedly, {(Au0)50-G5.NH2-mPEG2K} possesses a significantly higher Luc gene transfection efficiency than Au DENPs without PEGylation modification, implying that both the exterior surface mPEG modification and the interior Au NP entrapment significantly contribute to the enhanced gene delivery efficiency. The DNA transfection efficiency of all vectors at the optimal N/P ratio of 5:1 was further qualitatively validated by confocal microscopic observation of the EGFP gene expression (Fig. 12.3b). Clearly, there was no obvious EGFP expression in cells treated with PBS, naked pDNA or G5.NH2/pDNA complexes. In sharp contrast, HeLa cells incubated with all PEGylated Au DENPs/pDNA polyplexes showed a remarkably increased EGFP expression. The confocal microscopic observation further indicates that {(Au0)50-G5.NH2-mPEG2K} vector has excellent gene transfection efficiency, in accordance with the quantitative Luc activity assay results.
Likewise, cellular uptake capability of the polyplexes was necessary for enhanced gene delivery and expression. Cy3-labeled pDNA was selected as a probe to compare the cellular uptake of different PEGylated Au DENPs/DNA polyplexes using flow cytometry (Fig. 12.3c). It can be found that about 78.15% HeLa cells display Cy3-derived red fluorescence signal when {(Au0)50-G5.NH2-mPEG2K} was used as the vector, while the populations of the red fluorescent cells are 56.01, 59.01, and 55.74%, when {(Au0)25-G5.NH2-mPEG2K}, {(Au0)25-G5.NH2-mPEG5K}, and {(Au0)50-G5.NH2-mPEG5K} were used as the vectors, respectively. As expected, HeLa cells treated with all of the synthesized vectors show a higher population of red fluorescent cells than those treated with the G5.NH2 vector (35.84%).
Under the optimized conditions, the use of the partially PEGylated Au DENPs as vectors for siRNA delivery was explored. Bcl-2 siRNA was able to knockdown the expression of the Bcl-2 protein, a class of anti-apoptotic defense protein related to the multiple drug resistance in cancer cells. In this study, Bcl-2 siRNA was chosen as a model siRNA to evaluate the siRNA delivery capacity of the partially PEGylated Au DENPs. The siRNA transfection efficiency was finally comparatively studied by western blot analysis of Bcl-2 protein expression (Fig. 12.4). The Bcl-2 protein expression level in HeLa cells treated with G5.NH2/siRNA polyplex was set at 100%. Clearly, similar to Luc gene delivery, HeLa cells treated with {(Au0)50-G5.NH2-mPEG2K}/Bcl-2 siRNA polyplex displayed the lowest Bcl-2 protein expression (15%). The Bcl-2 protein expression levels are 56, 40, and 26% when {(Au0)25-G5.NH2-mPEG2K}, {(Au0)25-G5.NH2-mPEG5K}, and {(Au0)50-G5.NH2-mPEG5K} were used as the vectors, respectively.
These results prove that both of the interior entrapped AuNPs and exterior conjugated PEG chains can enhance the gene transfection efficiency of the G5.NH2 dendrimers. It is interesting to note that the proton sponge effect originated from the tertiary amine groups of PAMAM dendrimers or Au DENPs plays a key role in the endosomal escape of the vector/gene complexes [42, 78]. Although the dendrimers were subjected to surface partial PEGylation modification and interior Au NP entrapment, the proton sponge effect is believed not to be compromised and still makes the vector/pDNA or vector/siRNA polyplexes escape from the endosomes. Overall, {(Au0)50-G5.NH2-mPEG2K} is demonstrated to be the best vector for enhanced DNA or siRNA delivery among all the PEGylated Au DENPs.
3.3 β-CD-Modified Au DENPs for Gene Delivery
It is well known that cyclodextrins (CD) possess low toxicity [79, 80], non-immunogenicity and excellent hydrophobic cavity [81,82,83]. CD has been used as an enhancer in both viral and nonviral oligonucleotide delivery due to its binding with nucleic acids, facilitating increased gene stability against nuclease [84,85,86]. Meanwhile, positively charged CD has been explored as a new vector for gene delivery [87, 88]. Furthermore, various polycations covalently linked with CD have improved biocompatibility, water solubility, and gene transfection efficiency [89]. The enhanced gene delivery efficiency using CD-conjugated polymers could be due to the possible mechanisms that CD-polymer conjugates might increase the release of pDNA or the pDNA complex from endosomes following cellular uptake, although it is still unclear to what degree the membrane disruptive ability of CD-polymer conjugates contributes to the enhancing effect on gene transfer activity [85]. For instance, Gonzalez et al. [90] synthesized β-cyclodextrin (β-CD)-containing polymers for enhanced gene delivery applications, and showed that β-CD was able to be used as a biocompatibility- and solubility-enhancing moiety. It is reasonable to hypothesize that β-CD-modified G5 PAMAM dendrimers with AuNPs loaded within their interior may be developed as a highly efficient gene delivery vector.
In Qiu et al.’s study [91], an approach to using β-CD-modified dendrimer-entrapped AuNPs (Au DENPs) for enhanced gene delivery applications was presented (Scheme 12.3). G5.NH2-β-CD was first synthesized by modification of G5.NH2 dendrimer with N,N’-carbonyldiimidazole-activated β-CD according to the literature [92]. The gene transfection efficiency of the Au DENPs-β-CD vector was evaluated by transfecting both Luc reporter gene and EGFP gene to 293T cells in vitro.
According to the characterization of 1H NMR, the number of β-CD molecules conjugated on each G5 dendrimer was calculated to be 8.4, which decreased the cytotoxicity of G5 dendrimers to some extent. The cytotoxicity of the materials follows the order of Au DENPs-β-CD < Au DENPs < G5.NH2. Subsequent gene transfection experiment proved that at the N/P ratios of 5:1 and 10:1, the Luc expression using Au DENPs-β-CD vector reached 6.2 × 106 and 5.9 × 106 RLU/mg, respectively, significantly higher than that using G5.NH2 and Au DENPs vectors (p < 0.01) (Fig. 12.5). The result of EGFP expression was in accordance with the above data, showing the enhanced gene transfection efficiency of the Au DENPs-β-CD. Overall, our results imply that the surface conjugation of β-CD and the interior entrapment of AuNPs render the G5 dendrimers with less cytotoxicity than Au DENPs without β-CD conjugation, and enable more efficient cellular gene delivery than Au DENPs without β-CD conjugation.
4 Targeted Au DENPs for Gene Delivery
In order to realize targeted gene delivery, it is necessary to modify the dendrimer surface with a targeting ligand that can target to cells specifically via a receptor-mediated manner. Various targeting ligands such as folic acid (FA) [56, 93], peptides [28, 94], antibodies [95, 96], lactobionic acid (LA) [97, 98], and hyaluronic acid (HA) [99, 100], can be modified onto the surface of dendrimers for gene delivery. In this part, we focus on some recent developments of the Au DENP-based vectors for targeted gene delivery applications.
4.1 FA-Targeted Au DENPs for Gene Delivery
As one of the most studied cancer-targeting ligands, FA has been known to target FA receptors (FAR) that are overexpressed in several human carcinomas including breast, ovary, endometrium, kidney, lung, head, and neck, brain, and myeloid cancers [101,102,103]. In our study, we reported the use of FA-modified Au DENPs (Au DENPs-FA) for targeted gene delivery applications [43]. First, amine-terminated G5 dendrimers (G5.NH2) were covalently modified with FA. The formed FA-modified G5 dendrimers (G5.NH2-FA) were then used as templates to synthesize Au DENPs-FA. For comparison, Au DENPs without FA were used as a control.
Interestingly, Au DENPs-FA seemed to be less toxic than Au DENPs especially at high concentrations. This was presumably due to the fact that the surface modification of FA moieties onto the dendrimer surface might be able to alleviate the strong electrostatic interaction between the particles and the cells, although both vectors were measured to have a similar number of primary amines on the particle surfaces.
We used both firefly Luc and EGFP gene expression assays to investigate the targeted gene transfection efficiency of Au DENPs-FA vector in FAR-overexpressing HeLa cells. Figure 12.6a shows the gene transfection efficiency of both Au DENPs and Au DENPs-FA vectors as a function of the N/P ratio. It can be seen that both vectors have much higher transfection efficiency than that of the control cells without transfection treatment and cells transfected with naked pDNA, however, the transfection efficiency of both vectors is lower than that of the lipofectamine 2000 vector. We also show that the modification of FA onto Au DENPs affords Au DENPs-FA with much higher gene delivery efficiency compared to Au DENPs vector without FA at the N/P ratios of 1, 2.5, and 5 (p < 0.001). The gene transfection efficiency of both vectors is largely dependent on the N/P ratio of the polyplexes. At the N/P ratios of 2.5 and 5, the Luc expression value for Au DENPs-FA vector reached 2.19 × 106 and 1.99 × 106, respectively, significantly higher than that of Au DENPs without FA and the N/P ratio of 2.5 gave rise to the highest Luc transfection efficiency for the FA-targeted Au DENPs. These results suggest that the FA-modification onto the Au DENPs is able to render the vector with significantly high gene transfection efficiency to FAR-overexpressing HeLa cells, although both Au DENPs with or without FA display no appreciable difference in the binding affinity to pDNA. It should be noted that the entrapment of Au core NPs within dendrimers is essential to have improved gene delivery efficiency. Using G5.NH2-FA dendrimers without the core AuNPs as a vector, the gene delivery efficiency is much less than that using the Au DENPs-FA vector. This further suggests that the entrapment of Au core NPs are able to render the 3-D spherical shape of dendrimers, significantly improving the gene delivery efficiency, in agreement with our previous results [104].
The targeted gene transfection efficiency of Au DENPs-FA vector was also confirmed by EGFP expression assay. In this case, the gene delivery efficiency was determined by flow cytometry and reported as mean fluorescence intensity, which represents the amount of the EGFP expression. As shown in Fig. 12.6b, at the N/P ratios of 2.5 and 5, the Au DENPs-FA vector have significantly higher gene delivery efficiency than Au DENPs vector without FA-modification, corroborating with the Luc transfection assay data. Our results clearly suggest that the developed Au DENPs-FA vector was able to specifically deliver genes to FAR-overexpressing cancer cells via a receptor-mediated targeting pathway.
4.2 RGD-Targeted Au DENPs for Gene Delivery
The cell surface integrin receptors which are overexpressed in many types of cells including human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs), glioblastoma cells, ovarian cancer cells, and breast cancer cells [105,106,107] have been shown to have a high affinity to bind arginine-glycine-aspartic (Arg-Gly-Asp, RGD) peptide [35]. Therefore, RGD peptide has been identified as a promising targeting ligand for different biomedical applications [108]. Dendrimers modified with RGD peptide have been demonstrated to have binding specificity to integrin-overexpressing cancer cells for drug delivery [109, 110] and specific gene delivery [40] applications.
In one of our studies, we developed the use of RGD-modified Au DENPs for highly efficient and specific gene delivery to stem cells, where G5 dendrimers modified with RGD via a poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) spacer or with PEG monomethyl ether were used as templates to entrap AuNPs [28]. The RGD-modified PEGylated dendrimers and the respective well characterized Au DENPs were used as vectors to transfect hMSCs with pDNA carrying both the EGFP and the luciferase (pEGFPLuc) reporter genes, as well as pDNA encoding the human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (hBMP-2) gene.
In spite of the modification of PEG and RGD moieties onto the surface of dendrimers and internal entrapment of AuNPs, the hydrodynamic diameter (approximately 150–200 nm) and surface potential (around 20 mV) of the particles are appropriate for gene delivery. The prepared RGD-modified PEGylated Au DENPs own better biocompatibility than other groups in the given concentration range. This may be attributed to the fact that the modification of G5.NH2 dendrimers via surface PEGylation or interior AuNPs entrapment is beneficial to improve the cytocompatibility of the dendrimer-based vectors. In vitro gene transfection efficiency of pEGFPLuc reporter genes demonstrated by quantitative Luc activity assay and qualitative evaluation by fluorescence microscopy revealed that PEG-RGD-modified Au DENPs could transfer pEGFPLuc DNA to hMSCs successfully and possessed the highest delivery efficiency at an N/P ratio of 2.5.
Based on the transfection performance of pEGFPLuc, we selected an N/P ratio of 2.5:1 to evaluate the possibility of using the developed vector systems to transfect hMSCs with a pDNA carrying the hBMP-2 reporter gene. From Fig. 12.7a, it was clear that the non-transfected cells did not have appreciable hBMP-2 expression. In contrast, the hBMP-2 protein was expressed in cells transfected with the different dendrimer-based vectors. The hBMP-2 gene transfection efficiency followed the order of {(Au0)25-G5.NH2-(PEG-RGD)10-mPEG10} DENPs (K4) > {(Au0)25-G5.NH2-mPEG20} DENPs (K2) > G5.NH2-(PEG-RGD)10-mPEG10 dendrimers (K3) > G5.NH2-mPEG20 dendrimers (K1) > G5.NH2 dendrimers, similar to the above pEGFPLuc gene transfection results. The highest hBMP-2 gene transfection efficiency using the K4 vector should be due to the fact that the PEG-RGD modification of dendrimers and the entrapment of AuNPs within the dendrimers render the vector with RGD-mediated targeting effect and well-maintained 3-D conformation of dendrimers, respectively.
To confirm the hBMP-2 gene transfection-induced stem cell osteogenic differentiation, the activity of ALP, which was a membrane-bound enzyme secreted early in bone formation and had been identified to be an important early marker of osteogenesis [2, 35, 111], was analyzed. Figure 12.7b showed that the ALP activity increased with the cell culture time for hMSCs transfected with a given vector/pDNA complex. Additionally, the ALP activity of hMSCs on day 21 was significantly higher than that on days 7 and 14. At all time points, the ALP activity for the transfected hMSCs was obviously higher than that for the non-transfected cells. K4 displayed the highest ALP activity when compared with the other vectors due to the surface PEG-RGD modification and the entrapped AuNPs.
Osteocalcin was synthesized and secreted by osteoblasts, and had been identified as an important marker of late-stage osteogenic differentiation [112]. Both non-transfected and transfected cells displayed a low production rate of osteocalcin on day 14 (Fig. 12.7c). On day 21, a distinct increase in the level of osteocalcin secretion was detected for all transfected hMSCs, suggesting that hMSCs after transfection with the hBMP-2 gene using different dendrimer-based vectors are able to differentiate into the osteoblast lineage. Also, relative to G5.NH2 dendrimers, other four vector-transfected hMSCs were all observed to have visibly higher levels of osteocalcin secretion on day 21. Similarly, the K4 enabled the transfected hMSCs to have the highest osteocalcin secretion when compared to all other vectors, corroborating the ALP activity data.
Calcium deposition was another indicator that could be used to further characterize the degree of hMSCs osteogenic differentiation (Fig. 12.7d). The results clearly demonstrated higher quantities of calcium production in the transfected hMSCs cultures than in the non-transfected cultures. With time, the deposition of calcium progressively increased from day 14 to day 21, in agreement with work previously reported in the literature [113]. On both day 14 and day 21, hMSCs transfected by the K4 vector displayed the highest calcium content when compared to the other vectors. These results further verified that all dendrimer-based vectors can deliver exogenous genes and successfully induce the hMSCs osteogenic differentiation, with K4 being the most effective vector. Our study suggests that the gene delivery efficiency is largely dependent on the composition and surface modification of the vector. The surface modification with PEG-RGD and the entrapment of AuNPs render the dendrimer platform not only with targeting specificity to recognize integrin-expressing hMSCs, but also with the well-maintained 3-D conformation to have improved DNA compaction ability, thus affording the dendrimer-based vector with high gene transfection efficiency and specificity.
5 Conclusion and Outlooks
This chapter gives a brief literature overview of the recent advances in the use of dendrimer-based nanopaticles for gene delivery. To realize enhanced and specific gene delivery applications, dendrimers can be surface modified via alkylation, acetylation or PEGylation, can be surface modified with targeting ligands (e.g., FA, RGD peptide, and can be entrapped with AuNPs.
Although much effort has been devoted to the development of dendrimer-based NPs for gene delivery, this area of research still remains largely unexplored and needs to be further expanded. In view of the abundant amine groups on the dendrimer surface, antineoplastic drugs (e.g., doxorubicin or paclitaxel) may be conjugated, achieving combinational gene therapy and chemotherapy, significantly enhancing the efficacy of cancer therapy. In addition, due to the excellent antifouling property of zwitterionic materials, it is believed that further modification of zwitterionic materials onto the surface of dendrimers may be an effective approach to improve or optimize the transfection efficiency of the materials. Moreover, Au DENPs possess CT imaging effect when the molar ratio of Au/dendrimer achieves the certain proportion, hence, the combination of CT imaging and gene therapy is worthy of development. Besides, various photothermal agents may be modified with Au DENPs, thereby realizing the combinational photothermal therapy and gene therapy. Overall, All these challenges will stimulate scientists to develop multifunctional dendrimer-based NPs for gene delivery and other biological applications.
References
Cavazzana-Calvo M, Hacein-Bey S, Basile CD, Gross F, Yvon E, Nusbaum P, Selz F, Hue C, Certain S, Casanova JL, Bousso P, Le Deist F, Fischer A (2000) Gene therapy of human severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID)-X1 disease. Science 288(5466):669–672. doi:10.1126/science.288.5466.669
Jeong JH, Kim SW, Park TG (2003) Novel intracellular delivery system of antisense oligonucleotide by self-assembled hybrid micelles composed of DNA/PEG conjugate and cationic fusogenic peptide. Bioconjugate Chem 14(2):473–479
Yang ZR, Wang HF, Zhao J, Peng YY, Wang J, Guinn BA, Huang LQ (2007) Recent developments in the use of adenoviruses and immunotoxins in cancer gene therapy. Cancer Gene Ther 14(7):599–615. doi:10.1038/sj.cgt.7701054
Barhoumi A, Huschka R, Bardhan R, Knight MW, Halas NJ (2009) Light-induced release of DNA from plasmon-resonant nanoparticles: Towards light-controlled gene therapy. Chem Phys Lett 482(4):171–179
Biswas S, Torchilin VP (2013) Dendrimers for siRNA delivery. Pharmaceuticals 6(2):161–183
Scholz C, Wagner E (2012) Therapeutic plasmid DNA versus siRNA delivery: common and different tasks for synthetic carriers. J Controll Release 161(2):554–565
Kolhatkar RB, Kitchens KM, Swaan PW, Ghandehari H (2007) Surface acetylation of polyamidoamine (PAMAM) dendrimers decreases cytotoxicity while maintaining membrane permeability. Bioconjugate Chem 18(6):2054–2060
Whitehead KA, Langer R, Anderson DG (2009) Knocking down barriers: advances in siRNA delivery. Nat Rev Drug Discovery 8(2):129–138
Nguyen K, Dang PN, Alsberg E (2013) Functionalized, biodegradable hydrogels for control over sustained and localized siRNA delivery to incorporated and surrounding cells. Acta Biomater 9(1):4487–4495
Paroo Z, Corey DR (2004) Challenges for RNAi in vivo. Trends Biotechnol 22(8):390–394
Tang J, Chen JY, Liu JY, Luo M, Wang YJ, Wei XW, Gao X, Wang BL, Liu YB, Yi T (2012) Calcium phosphate embedded PLGA nanoparticles: a promising gene delivery vector with high gene loading and transfection efficiency. Int J Pharm 431(1):210–221
Li S, Huang L (2000) Nonviral gene therapy: promises and challenges. Gene Ther 7:31–34
Verma IM, Weitzman MD (2005) Gene therapy: twenty-first century medicine. Annu Rev Biochem 74:711–738
Guillot-Nieckowski M, Eisler S, Diederich F (2007) Dendritic vectors for gene transfection. New J Chem 31:1111–1127
Anderson WF (1998) Human gene therapy. Nature 392:25–30
Kay MA, Glorioso JC, Naldini L (2001) Viral vectors for gene therapy: the art of turning infectious agents into vehicles of therapeutics. Nat Med 7:33–40
Luo D, Saltzman WM (2000) Synthetic dna delivery systems. Nat Biotechnol 18:33–37
Mancheño-Corvo P, Martin-Duque P (2006) Viral gene therapy. Clin Transl Oncol 8:858–867
Thomas CE, Ehrhardt A, Kay MA (2003) Progress and problems with the use of viral vectors for gene therapy. Nat Rev Genet 4:346–358
Paleos CM, Tziveleka LA, Sideratou Z, Tsiourvas D (2009) Gene delivery using functional dendritic polymers. Expert Opin Drug Delivery 6:27–38
Shcharbin DG, Klajnert B, Bryszewska M (2009) Dendrimers in gene transfection. Biochemistry (Moscow) 74:1070–1079
Svenson S, Tomalia DA (2005) Dendrimers in biomedical applications–reflections on the field. Adv Drug Delivery Rev 57:2106–2129
Dufès C, Uchegbu IF, Schätzlein AG (2005) Dendrimers in gene delivery. Adv Drug Delivery Rev 57(15):2177–2202
Mintzer MA, Simanek EE (2009) Nonviral vectors for gene delivery. Chem Rev 109:259–302
Kesharwani P, Iyer AK (2015) Recent advances in dendrimer-based nanovectors for tumor-targeted drug and gene delivery. Drug Discov Today 20(5):536–547
Menjoge AR, Kannan RM, Tomalia DA (2010) Dendrimer-based drug and imaging conjugates: design considerations for nanomedical applications. Drug Discov Today 15(5):171–185
Tang Y, Li YB, Wang B, Lin RY, Van Dongen M, Zurcher DM, Gu XY, Banaszak Holl MM, Liu G, Qi R (2012) Efficient in vitro siRNA delivery and intramuscular gene silencing using PEG-modified PAMAM dendrimers. Mol Pharm 9(6):1812–1821
Kong LD, Alves CS, Hou WX, Qiu JQ, Möhwald H, Tomás H, Shi XY (2015) RGD peptide-modified dendrimer-entrapped gold nanoparticles enable highly efficient and specific gene delivery to stem cells. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7(8):4833–4843
Liu C, Liu XX, Rocchi P, Qu FQ, Iovanna JL, Peng L (2014) Arginine-terminated generation 4 PAMAM dendrimer as an effective nanovector for functional siRNA delivery in vitro and in vivo. Bioconjugate Chem 25(3):521–532
Merdan T, Kopec̆ek J, Kissel T (2002) Prospects for cationic polymers in gene and oligonucleotide therapy against cancer. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 54(5):715–758
Waite CL, Sparks SM, Uhrich KE, Roth CM (2009) Acetylation of PAMAM dendrimers for cellular delivery of siRNA. BMC Biotechnol 9(1):38
Fant K, Esbjorner EK, Jenkins A, Grossel M, Lincoln P, Norden B (2010) Effects of pegylation and acetylation of pamam dendrimers on dna binding, cytotoxicity and in vitro transfection efficiency. Mol Pharm 7:1734–1746
He H, Li Y, Jia XR, Du J, Ying X, Lu WL, Lou JN, Wei Y (2011) PEGylated poly(amidoamine) dendrimer-based dual-targeting carrier for treating brain tumors. Biomaterials 32:478–487
Mishra S, Webster P, Davis ME (2004) PEGylation significantly affects cellular uptake and intracellular trafficking of non-viral gene delivery particles. Eur J Cell Biol 83:97–111
Qi R, Gao Y, Tang Y, He RR, Liu TL, He Y, Sun S, Li BY, Li YB, Liu G (2009) PEG-conjugated PAMAM dendrimers mediate efficient intramuscular gene expression. AAPS J 11(3):395–405
Gabrielson NP, Pack DW (2006) Acetylation of polyethylenimine enhances gene delivery via weakened polymer/DNA interactions. Biomacromol 7:2427–2435
Santos JL, Oliveira H, Pandita D, Rodrigues J, Pêgo AP, Granja PL, Tomas H (2010) Functionalization of poly(amidoamine) dendrimers with hydrophobic chains for improved gene delivery in mesenchymal stem cells. J Controlled Release 144:55–64. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2010.01.034
Shakhbazau A, Isayenka I, Kartel N, Goncharova N, Seviaryn I, Kosmacheva S, Potapnev M, Shcharbin DG, Bryszewska M (2010) Transfection efficiencies of PAMAM dendrimers correlate inversely with their hydrophobicity. Int J Pharm 383(1–2):228–235
Han L, Zhang AL, Wang HJ, Pu PY, Jiang XG, Kang CS, Chang J (2010) Tat-BMPs-PAMAM conjugates enhance therapeutic effect of small interference RNA on u251 glioma cells in vitro and in vivo. Hum Gene Ther 21:417–426. doi:10.1089/hum.2009.087
Santos JL, Pandita D, Rodrigues J, Pêgo AP, Granja PL, Balian G, Tomás H (2010) Receptor-mediated gene delivery using PAMAM dendrimers conjugated with peptides recognized by mesenchymal stem cells. Mol Pharm 7(3):763–774
Hou WX, Wen SH, Guo R, Wang SG, Shi XY (2015) Partially acetylated dendrimer-entrapped gold nanoparticles with reduced cytotoxicity for gene delivery applications. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 15(6):4094–4105
Shan YB, Luo T, Peng C, Sheng RL, Cao AM, Cao XY, Shen MW, Guo R, Tomas H, Shi XY (2012) Gene delivery using dendrimer-entrapped gold nanoparticles as nonviral vectors. Biomaterials 33(10):3025–3035. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.12.045
Xiao TY, Hou WX, Cao XY, Wen SH, Shen MW, Shi XY (2013) Dendrimer-entrapped gold nanoparticles modified with folic acid for targeted gene delivery applications. Biomater Sci 1(11):1172–1180. doi:10.1039/c3bm60138b
Xiao TY, Cao XY, Hou WX, Peng C, Qiu JR, Shi XY (2015) Poly(amidoamine) dendrimers modified with 1,2-epoxyhexane or 1,2-epoxydodecane for enhanced gene delivery applications. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 15(12):10134–10140. doi:10.1166/jnn.2015.11693
Hong SP, Bielinska AU, Mecke A, Keszler B, Beals JL, Shi XY, Balogh L, Orr BG, Baker JR, Holl MMB (2004) Interaction of poly(amidoamine) dendrimers with supported lipid bilayers and cells: Hole formation and the relation to transport. Bioconjugate Chem 15(4):774–782. doi:10.1021/bc049962b
Daniel MC, Astruc D (2004) Gold nanoparticles: Assembly, supramolecular chemistry, quantum-size-related properties, and applications toward biology, catalysis, and nanotechnology. Chem Rev 104:293–346
Duncan B, Kim CK, Rotello VM (2010) Gold nanoparticle platforms as drug and biomacromolecule delivery systems. J Controlled Release 148:122–127
Li D, Cui Y, Wang K, He Q, Yan X, Li J (2007) Thermosensitive nanostructures comprising gold nanoparticles grafted with block copolymers. Adv Funct Mater 17:3134–3140. doi:10.1002/adfm.200700427
Li DX, He Q, Cui Y, Li JB (2007) Fabrication of pH-responsive nanocomposites of gold nanoparticles/poly(4-vinylpyridine). Chem Mater 19:412–417. doi:10.1021/cm062290+
Li DX, He Q, Cui Y, Wang KW, Zhang XM, Li JB (2007) Thermosensitive copolymer networks modify gold nanoparticles for nanocomposite entrapment. Chem - Eur J 13:2224–2229. doi:10.1002/chem.200600839
Li D, He Q, Li J (2009) Smart core/shell nanocomposites: intelligent polymers modified gold nanoparticles. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 149:28–38
Li DX, He Q, Yang Y, Möhwald H, Li JB (2008) Two-stage pH response of poly(4-vinylpyridine) grafted gold nanoparticles. Macromolecules 41:7254–7256. doi:10.1021/ma800894c
Elbakry A, Wurster EC, Zaky A, Liebl R, Schindler E, Bauer-Kreisel P, Blunk T, Rachel R, Goepferich A, Breunig M (2012) Layer-by-Layer coated gold nanoparticles: size-dependent delivery of DNA into cells. Small 8(24):3847–3856. doi:10.1002/smll.201201112
Figueroa ER, Lin AY, Yan JX, Luo L, Foster AE, Drezek RA (2014) Optimization of PAMAM-gold nanoparticle conjugation for gene therapy. Biomaterials 35(5):1725–1734. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.11.026
Kawano T, Yamagata M, Takahashi H, Niidome Y, Yamada S, Katayama Y, Niidome T (2006) Stabilizing of plasmid DNA in vivo by PEG-modified cationic gold nanoparticles and the gene expression assisted with electrical pulses. J Controlled Release 111(3):382–389. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2005.12.022
Xiao TY, Cao XY, Shi XY (2013) Dendrimer-entrapped gold nanoparticles modified with folic acid for targeted gene delivery applications. J Controll Release 172(1):e114–e115. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2013.08.275
Heinemann D, Schomaker M, Kalies S, Schieck M, Carlson R, Escobar HM, Ripken T, Meyer H, Heisterkamp A (2013) Gold nanoparticle mediated laser transfection for efficient siRNA mediated gene knock down. Plos One 8(3). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0058604
Jiwaji M, Sandison ME, Reboud J, Stevenson R, Daly R, Barkess G, Faulds K, Kolch W, Graham D, Girolami MA, Cooper JM, Pitt AR (2014) Quantification of functionalised gold nanoparticle-targeted knockdown of gene expression in HeLa cells. PLoS ONE 9(6):e99458. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0099458
Kirkland-York S, Zhang YL, Smith AE, York AW, Huang FQ, McCormick CL (2010) Tailored design of Au nanoparticle-siRNA carriers utilizing reversible addition—fragmentation chain transfer polymers. Biomacromol 11(4):1052–1059. doi:10.1021/bm100020x
Kong WH, Bae KH, Jo SD, Kim JS, Park TG (2012) Cationic lipid-coated gold ganoparticles as efficient and non-cytotoxic intracellular siRNA delivery vehicles. Pharm Res 29(2):362–374. doi:10.1007/s11095-011-0554-y
Mitra M, Kandalam M, Rangasamy J, Shankar B, Maheswari UK, Swaminathan S, Krishnakumar S (2013) Novel epithelial cell adhesion molecule antibody conjugated polyethyleneimine-capped gold nanoparticles for enhanced and targeted small interfering RNA delivery to retinoblastoma cells. Mol Vis 19:1029–1038
Ghosh PS, Kim CK, Han G, Forbes NS, Rotello VM (2008) Efficient gene delivery vectors by tuning the surface charge density of amino acid-functionalized gold nanoparticles. ACS Nano 2:2213–2218
Voet D, Voet JG (1995) Biochemistry, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York
Jevprasesphant R, Penny J, Jalal R, Attwood D, McKeown NB, D’emanuele A (2003) The influence of surface modification on the cytotoxicity of PAMAM dendrimers. Int J Pharm 252 (1):263–266
M. KK, B. KR, W. SP, D. EN, H. G (2006) Transport of poly (amidoamine) dendrimers across caco-2 cell monolayers: influence of size, charge and fluorescent labeling. Pharm Res 23(12):2818–2826
Luo D, Haverstick K, Belcheva N, Han E, Saltzman WM (2002) Poly (ethylene glycol)-conjugated PAMAM dendrimer for biocompatible, high-efficiency DNA delivery. Macromolecules 35(9):3456–3462
Wang X, Wu X, Fan W, Ding BY, Wang XY, Zhang W, Ding XY, Gao J, Zhu QG, Liu JY, Cai Z, Gao S (2012) Surface modification with pluronic P123 enhances transfection efficiency of PAMAM dendrimer. Macromol Res 20(2):162–167. doi:10.1007/s13233-012-0031-4
Shukla R, Thomas TP, Peters J, Kotlyar A, Myc A, Baker JR Jr (2005) Tumor angiogenic vasculature targeting with PAMAM dendrimer–RGD conjugates. Chem Commun 46:5739–5741
Choi JS, Nam K, Park J, Kim JB, Lee JK (2004) Enhanced transfection efficiency of PAMAM dendrimer by surface modification with L-arginine. J Controlld Release 99(3):445–456
Kim JB, Choi JS, Nam K, Lee M, Park JS, Lee JK (2006) Enhanced transfection of primary cortical cultures using arginine-grafted PAMAM dendrimer, PAMAM-Arg. J Controll Release 114(1):110–117
Yu GS, Bae YM, Kim JY, Han J, Ko KS, Choi JS (2012) Amino acid-modified bioreducible poly(amidoamine) dendrimers: synthesis, characterization and in vitro evaluation. Macromol Res 20(11):1156–1162. doi:10.1007/s13233-012-0164-5
Wang W, Xiong W, Wan J, Sun X, Xu H, Yang X (2009) The decrease of PAMAM dendrimer-induced cytotoxicity by PEGylation via attenuation of oxidative stress. Nanotechnology 20:105103
Lee M, Kim SW (2005) Polyethylene glycol-conjugated copolymers for plasmid DNA delivery. Pharm Res 22(1):1–10
Peng C, Zheng LF, Chen Q, Shen MW, Guo R, Wang H, Cao XY, Zhang GX, Shi XY (2012) PEGylated dendrimer-entrapped gold nanoparticles for in vivo blood pool and tumor imaging by computed tomography. Biomaterials 33(4):1107–1119. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.10.052
Xua L, Shena W, Wang B, Wang X, Liua G, Taoc Y, Qia R (2016) Efficient siRNA delivery using PEG-conjugated PAMAM dendrimers targeting vascular endothelial growth factor in a CoCl2-induced neovascularization model in retinal endothelial cells. Curr Drug Delivery 13(10):590–599
Kim T, Seo HJ, Choi JS, Jang HS, Baek J, Kim K, Park JS (2004) PAMAM-PEG-PAMAM: novel triblock copolymer as a biocompatible and efficient gene delivery carrier. Biomacromol 5:2487–2492
Hou WX, Wei P, Kong LD, Guo R, Wang SG, Shi XY (2016) Partially PEGylated dendrimer-entrapped gold nanoparticles: a promising nanoplatform for highly efficient DNA and siRNA delivery. J Mater Chem B 4(17):2933–2943. doi:10.1039/c6tb00710d
Patil ML, Zhang M, Taratula O, Garbuzenko OB, He HX, Minko T (2009) Internally cationic polyamidoamine PAMAM-OH dendrimers for siRNA delivery: effect of the degree of quaternization and cancer targeting. Biomacromol 10(2):258–266
Davis ME, Brewster ME (2004) Cyclodextrin-based pharmaceutics: Past, present and future. Nat Rev Drug Discovery 3(12):1023–1035. doi:10.1038/nrd1576
Irie T, Uekama K (1997) Pharmaceutical applications of cyclodextrins.3. Toxicological issues and safety evaluation. J Pharm Sci 86(2):147–162. doi:10.1021/js960213f
Popielarski SR, Mishra S, Davis ME (2003) Structural effects of carbohydrate-containing polycations on gene delivery. 3. Cyclodextrin type and functionalization. Bioconjugate Chem 14(3):672–678. doi:10.1021/bc034010b
Szejtli J (1998) Introduction and general overview of cyclodextrin chemistry. Chem Rev 98(5):1743–1753. doi:10.1021/cr970022c
Yao H, Ng SS, Tucker WO, Tsang YKT, Man K, Wang XM, Chow BKC, Kung HF, Tang GP, Lin MC (2009) The gene transfection efficiency of a folate-PEI600-cyclodextrin nanopolymer. Biomaterials 30(29):5793–5803. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.06.051
Croyle MA, Roessler BJ, Hsu CP, Sun R, Amidon GL (1998) Beta cyclodextrins enhance adenoviral-mediated gene delivery to the intestine. Pharm Res 15(9):1348–1355. doi:10.1023/a:1011985101580
Kihara F, Arima H, Tsutsumi T, Hirayama F, Uekama K (2003) In vitro and in vivo gene transfer by an optimized alpha-cyclodextrin conjugate with polyamidoamine dendrimer. Bioconjugate Chem 14(2):342–350. doi:10.1021/bc025613a
Ortiz Mellet C, Garcia Fernandez JM, Benito JM (2011) Cyclodextrin-based gene delivery systems. Chem Soc Rev 40(3):1586–1608. doi:10.1039/c0cs00019a
Cryan SA, Holohan A, Donohue R, Darcy R, O’Driscoll CM (2004) Cell transfection with polycationic cyclodextrin vectors. Eur J Pharm Sci 21(5):625–633. doi:10.1016/j.ejps.2004.01.001
Mourtzis N, Paravatou M, Mavridis IM, Roberts ML, Yannakopoulou K (2008) Synthesis, characterization, and remarkable biological properties of cyclodextrins bearing guanidinoalkylamino and aminoalkylamino groups on their primary side. Chem - Eur J 14(14):4188–4200. doi:10.1002/chem.200701650
Forrest ML, Gabrielson N, Pack DW (2005) Cyclodextrin-polyethylenimine conjugates for targeted in vitro gene delivery. Biotechnol Bioeng 89(4):416–423. doi:10.1002/bit.20356
Gonzalez H, Hwang SJ, Davis ME (1999) New class of polymers for the delivery of macromolecular therapeutics. Bioconjugate Chem 10(6):1068–1074. doi:10.1021/bc990072j
Qiu JR, Kong LD, Cao XY, Li AJ, Tan HR, Shi XY (2016) Dendrimer-entrapped gold nanoparticles modified with beta-cyclodextrin for enhanced gene delivery applications. RSC Adv 6(31):25633–25640. doi:10.1039/c6ra03839e
Wang H, Shao NM, Qiao SN, Cheng YY (2012) Host-guest chemistry of dendrimer-cyclodextrin conjugates: selective encapsulations of guests within dendrimer or cyclodextrin cavities revealed by NOE NMR techniques. J Phys Chem B 116(36):11217–11224. doi:10.1021/jp3062916
Sunoqrot S, Bugno J, Lantvit D, Burdette JE, Hong S (2014) Prolonged blood circulation and enhanced tumor accumulation of folate-targeted dendrimer-polymer hybrid nanoparticles. J Controll Release 191:115–122. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.05.006
Baigude H, Katsuraya K, Okuyama K, Uryu T (2004) Synthesis of structurally-controlled AIDS vaccine model with glyco-peptide dendrimer scaffolds. Macromol Chem Phy 205(5):684–691. doi:10.1002/macp.200300097
Kobayashi H, Sato N, Saga T, Nakamoto Y, Ishimori T, Toyama S, Togashi K, Konishi J, Brechbiel MW (2000) Monoclonal antibody-dendrimer conjugates enable radiolabeling of antibody with markedly high specific activity with minimal loss of immunoreactivity. Eur J Nucl Med 27(9):1334–1339. doi:10.1007/s002590000293
Yoon HC, Lee D, Kim HS (2002) Reversible affinity interactions of antibody molecules at functionalized dendrimer monolayer: affinity-sensing surface with reusability. Anal Chim Acta 456(2):209–218. doi:10.1016/s0003-2670(02)00032-6
Fu FF, Wu YL, Zhu JY, Wen SH, Shen MW, Shi XY (2014) Multifunctional lactobionic acid-modified dendrimers for targeted drug delivery to liver cancer cells: investigating the role played by PEG spacer. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6(18):16416–16425. doi:10.1021/am504849x
Liu H, Wang H, Xu YH, Guo R, Wen SH, Huang YP, Liu WN, Shen MW, Zhao JL, Zhang GX, Shi XY (2014) Lactobionic acid-modified dendrimer-entrapped gold nanoparticles for targeted computed tomography imaging of human hepatocellular carcinoma. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6(9):6944–6953. doi:10.1021/am500761x
Bi XD, Liang AY, Tan Y, Maturavongsadit P, Higginbothem A, Gado T, Gramling A, Bahn HN, Wang Q (2016) Thiol-ene crosslinking polyamidoamine dendrimer-hyaluronic acid hydrogel system for biomedical applications. J Biomat Sci - Polymer E 27(8):743–757. doi:10.1080/09205063.2016.1159473
Zhan JZ, Wang L, Liu S, Chen JJ, Ren L, Wang YJ (2015) Antimicrobial hyaluronic acid/poly(amidoamine) dendrimer multi layer on poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-4-hydroxybutyrate) prepared by a layer-by-layer self-assembly method. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7(25):13876–13881. doi:10.1021/acsami.5b02262
Campbell IG, Jones TA, Foulkes WD, Trowsdale J (1991) Folate-binding protein is a marker for ovarian cancer. Cancer Res 51(19):5329–5338
Ross JF, Chaudhuri PK, Ratnam M (1994) Differential regulation of folate receptor isoforms in normal and malignant tissues in vivo and in established cell lines-Physiologic and clinical implications. Cancer 73(9):2432–2443. doi:10.1002/1097-0142(19940501)73:9<2432:aid-cncr2820730929>3.0.co;2-s
Weitman SD, Lark RH, Coney LR, Fort DW, Frasca V, Zurawski VR, Kamen BA (1992) Distribution of the folate receptor GP38 in normal and malignant cell lines and tissues. Cancer Res 52(12):3396–3401
Shan Y, Luo T, Peng C, Sheng R, Cao A, Cao X, Shen M, Guo R, Tomás H, Shi X (2012) Gene delivery using dendrimer-entrapped gold nanoparticles as nonviral vectors. Biomaterials 33:3025–3035
Cai WB, Chen XY (2006) Anti-angiogenic cancer therapy based on integrin alphavbeta3 antagonism. Adv Anticancer Agents Med Chem 6(5):407–428
Dechantsreiter MA, Planker E, Mathä B, Lohof E, Hölzemann G, Jonczyk A, Goodman SL, Kessler H (1999) N-methylated cyclic RGD peptides as highly active and selective αvβ3 integrin antagonists. J Med Chem 42(16):3033–3040
Gronthos S, Simmons PJ, Graves SE, G. Robey P (2001) Integrin-mediated interactions between human bone marrow stromal precursor cells and the extracellular matrix. Bone 28(2):174–181
Qiao Z, Shi XY (2014) Dendrimer-based molecular imaging contrast agents. Prog Polym Sci. doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2014.1008.1002
He X, Alves C, Oliveira N, Rodrigues J, Zhu J, Bányai I, Tomás H, Shi X (2015) RGD peptide-modified multifunctional dendrimer platform for drug encapsulation and targeted inhibition of cancer cells. Colloids Surf B 125:82–89
Shukla R, Hill E, Shi XY, Kim JB, Muniz MC, Sun K, Baker JR (2008) Tumor microvasculature targeting with dendrimer-entrapped gold nanoparticles. Soft Matter 4(11):2160–2163
Garg A, Tisdale AW, Haidari E, Kokkoli E (2009) Targeting colon cancer cells using PEGylated liposomes modified with a fibronectin-mimetic peptide. Int J Pharm 366(1):201–210
Reseland JE, Syversen U, Bakke I, Qvigstad G, Eide LG, Hjertner Ø, Gordeladze JO, Drevon CA (2001) Leptin is expressed in and secreted from primary cultures of human osteoblasts and promotes bone mineralization. J Bone Miner Res 16(8):1426–1433
Wang SG, Castro R, An X, Song CL, Luo Y, Shen MW, Tomás H, Zhu MF, Shi XY (2012) Electrospun laponite-doped poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) nanofibers for osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. J Mater Chem 22(44):23357–23367
Acknowledgments
This research is financially supported by the Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (17540712000), National Science Foundation of China (81761148028, 21773026), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities. X. Shi also acknowledges the support by FCT-Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (project PEst-OE/QUI/UI0674/2013, CQM, Portuguese Government funds) and by ARDITI-Agência Regional para o Desenvolvimento da Investigação Tecnologia e Inovação through the project M1420-01-0145-FEDER-000005-Centro de Química da Madeira-CQM+ (Madeira 14-20)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kong, L., Shi, X. (2017). Functional Dendrimer-Based Vectors for Gene Delivery Applications. In: Li, J. (eds) Supramolecular Chemistry of Biomimetic Systems. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6059-5_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6059-5_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-6058-8
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-6059-5
eBook Packages: Chemistry and Materials ScienceChemistry and Material Science (R0)