Abstract
Bacterial released volatile compounds (VOCs) in air enable bacteria to interact with their surrounding environment. Soil bacterial volatiles are known to contribute to plant interactions, and several studies also identified their influence on plant stress tolerance. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacterial (PGPR)-mediated VOCs are reported to increase seedling emergence, plant weight, crop yield, and stress resistance. The present chapter describes the characterization of different bacterial VOCs and their roles in enhancement of plant abiotic stress tolerance, a new research area, with potential agriculture applications.
Access provided by CONRICYT-eBooks. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Abiotic stress
- Bacterium
- Plant growth-ptomoting bacterium
- Volatile organic compounds
- C4-bacterial volatiles
2.1 Introduction
Plants live naturally with many microorganisms, and the nutrient-rich environment of the rhizosphere is especially conducive to interactions between microorganisms and plants. Plants release different products through the roots into the surrounding area that attract a tremendous diversity of microorganisms (Perry et al. 2007). Some of these microorganisms have no observable effects on plant; others enhance or inhibit plant growth. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) can stimulate plant growth or increase tolerance by producing nonvolatile substances, such as the hormones auxin and cytokinin, as well as 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate (ACC) deaminase, which reduces plant ethylene levels, and siderophores, which facilitate root uptake of metal nutrients. In addition, certain PGPR promote plant growth by emitting volatile organic compounds (VOCs) (Vaishnav et al. 2017). Volatile compounds have low molecular weight (<300 Da) and high vapor pressure (0.01 kPa at 20 °C) in nature that can readily evaporate and diffuse through heterogeneous mixtures of solids, liquids, and gasses (Audrain et al. 2015). The spectrum of bacterial VOCs is influenced by heterogeneity of soil, which depends on bacterial/plant-secreted metabolites. Some VOCs are specific for a phylogenetic group and used for taxonomic purposes (Kai et al. 2016). The volatile compounds are generally produced as metabolic end products of anaerobic fermentation processes and extracellular degradation of complex organic molecules. The widely differing species of bacteria were capable of emitting a variety of volatile compounds, comprising of fatty acid derivatives, terpenoids, and aromatic, nitrogenous, and sulfurous compounds. Interestingly, many of the substances found in the bacterial scent spectra have not been identified yet, and their biological roles are also unknown. By referring to a few known examples and by comparison with known functions of scents from other groups of organisms, it is assumed that the bacterial scents serve as signal compounds for interspecies and intraspecies communication or from cell to cell, for the disposal of excess carbon compounds, or as substances that stimulate or inhibit growth (Wenke et al. 2010). Many investigations concerning VOC pattern of soil microorganisms were performed under different treatment conditions. Bolm et al. performed a large screening of volatile-mediated effects on Arabidopsis thaliana. The VOC effect was found highly dependent on cultivation medium and the inoculum quantity. The production of beneficial VOC compound butanediol was found higher on the nutrient-rich media LB and MR-VP and less pronounced on MS and Angel. In another study, P. simiae strain AU changed VOC pattern in the presence of soybean seeds and sodium nitroprusside (SNP, a nitric oxide donor) treatment. Some compound expression was enhanced in the presence of soybean seedlings, and few compounds like 4-nitroguaiacol and quinolone are newly expressed in the presence of SNP. These compounds were showed significant enhancement of seed germination and higher fresh weight of soybean under 100 mm NaCl stress (Vaishnav et al. 2016). As a result of the increasing interests in VOCs in mediating plant-microorganism interactions, the present chapter focuses on the chemical nature of microbial VOCs, as well as the effects of microbial VOCs on tolerance level of plants under abiotic stresses.
2.2 Chemical Side of VOCs
Solid-phase microextraction (SPME) and dynamic headspace volatile analyses have revealed that PGPR strains have the requisite machinery to synthesize a wide range of volatiles, including short-chain aliphatic aldehydes, esters, alcohols, organic acids, ethers, ketones, sulfur compounds, and hydrocarbons.
2.3 Hydrocarbons
These products are derived from fatty acid biosynthetic pathways. Short-chain alkanes (decane to tetradecane) are found in bacteria, while longer hydrocarbons such as hexadecane are particularly abundant in cyanobacteria, which are also known for their ability to synthesize branched hydrocarbons (Audrain et al. 2015). In a volatiles profiling study, Paenibacillus polymyxa strain E681 was exclusively released long-chain C13 tridecane which augments ISR and protected Arabidopsis seedlings against the biotrophic pathogenic bacterium Pseudomonas syringae pv. maculicola ES4326 (Lee et al. 2012). The priming with pure tridecane compound at 10 mM increased 4.7-fold in transcription of pathogenesis-related gene (PR1) before pathogen challenge and 3.3-fold increase at 3 h after pathogen challenge. Some other hydrocarbons like isoprene, acetylene, cyclohexane, 1-undecane, and dodecane were also found in P. polymyxa E681-derived VOCs blend. An n-decanal volatile compound derived from different Pseudomonas sp. was found to completely inhibited Sclerotinia sclerotiorum suggesting its role in biological control (Fernando et al. 2005). Recently, Vaishnav et al. (2016) demonstrated the effect of pure tridecane compound on soybean seed germination under salt stress. Seed germination was found higher in the presence of tridecane as compared to control.
2.4 Ketones/Alcohols
PGPR strains B. amyloliquefaciens IN937 and B. subtilis GB03 were found to produce acetoin (3-hydroxy-2-butanone) compound that triggers growth promotion and resistance in Arabidopsis seedlings. The acetoin and its oxidized form 2, 3-butanediol are derived from anaerobic fermentation of pyruvate. In vitro production of 2, 3-butanediol is also favored in the presence of sucrose as a major nutrient in growth media (Ryu et al. 2004). 2R, 3R-butanediol derived from P. chlororaphis O6 was found as major determinant in inducing resistance to drought in Arabidopsis through an SA-dependent mechanism (Cho et al. 2008). In addition, short-chain-branched alcohols such as 3-methyl-1-butanol and 2-methyl-1-butanol were also found to accumulate in B. amyloliquefaciens IN937a producing VOCs. These compounds are formed by enzymatic conversion of branched chain amino acids, i.e., leucine and isoleucine via the Ehrlich pathway (Marilley and Casey 2004). Long-chain aliphatic alcohols (i.e., 1-octanol, 1-decanol, and 1-dodecanol) are commonly associated with Enterobacteriaceae; they are produced through β- or α-oxidation of fatty acid derivatives, and thus, their concentration are markedly increased from cultures supplemented with fatty acids (Hamilton-Kemp et al. 2005). 1-Hexanol produced by Pseudomonas sp. (Fernando et al. 2005; Vaishnav et al. 2016) and Bacillus sp. (Chaurasia et al.) has been reported as a potential plant growth promoter and antifungal compound. During a large screening of VOCs, 1-hexanol was found most release compounds from 42 different bacterial strains and appeared to promote plant growth (Blom et al. 2011).
2.5 Acids
Short-chain fatty acids like acetic acid are derived from VOCs of an antagonist bacterium Burkholderia tropica which is found to inhibit the growth of four phytopathogenic fungi, Colletotrichum gloeosporioides, Fusarium culmorum, Fusarium oxysporum, and Sclerotium rolfsii (Tenorio-Salgado et al. 2013). A salt-tolerant PGPR bacterium P. simiae AU produced different types of acids in VOC blend, i.e., stearic acid, phthalic acid, acetic acid, oxalic acid, myristic acid, hexadecanoic acid, etc. The exposure of P. simiae-mediated VOCs is found to induce tolerance in soybean plants against salt stress (Vaishnav et al. 2016). These acids are major by-products of anaerobic metabolism; indeed, they are formed during bacterial fermentation of carbohydrates.
2.6 Sulfur Compounds
Dimethyl disulfide (DMDS) and dimethyl trisulfide (DMTS) are produced by most of PGPR strains. Benzothiazole compound was derived from different Pseudomonas spp. and showed potential in the inhibition of sclerotial activity and enhanced salt tolerance in soybean plants (Fernando et al. 2005; Vaishnav et al. 2016).
2.7 Inorganic Compounds
Hydrogen cyanide is mostly produced by virulent bacterial strains (e.g., Pseudomonas or Chromobacterium species). It is a potent inhibitor of cytochrome c oxidase and of other metal-containing enzyme, hence responsible for plant-killing effects (Blom et al. 2011). Cyanide production by rhizosphere bacteria is considered as a plant growth-promoting trait which is used as biocontrol against phytopathogenic fungi (Voisard et al. 1989 ).
2.8 Test Systems
Two types of systems are mainly used for volatiles studies as follows: (a) a closed setup (Petri dish or box) and (b) a directed airflow in order to transport the volatiles to the plant.
2.9 Closed Systems
More than half of all volatile studies were operated by passive diffusion using partite Petri dishes. A plastic border separates the dish into two (I-shaped) or three (Y-shaped) compartments (Fig. 2.1a). Bacteria and plants/pathogens are inoculated in individual compartment which make them physically separate to each other. The exchange of VOCs is facilitated solely via headspace. To prevent the escape of VOCs, Petri dishes are sealed with parafilm. In order to extract the volatile compounds, experiment is performed in tripartite Petri dishes. In this, one partition contained bacterial culture, second inoculated with plant seeds/pathogen, and in third sterile-activated charcoal placed. Activated charcoal has a good adsorbent quality; therefore, it is mainly used to collect the VOCs in a closed setup. After incubation period, the activated charcoal is collected and washed with any organic solvent according to the aim of the study. In many studies, dichloromethane (DCM) was used to extract all trapped volatile compounds, which were posteriorly analyzed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). This way, Fernando et al. (2005) found that mycelial growth was completely inhibited in the presence of bacterial VOCs which streaked in a different compartment. Mycelial growth was unaffected by the presence of volatile-producing bacteria, when the third compartment of the plates was amended with activated charcoal. Charcoal adsorbs volatiles as soon as they are produced, and hence no inhibitory effect was observed. Plant growth promotion was also observed with partitie Petri dish setup by Ryu et al. (2004), Blom et al. (2011), and Vaishnav et al. (2016). The limitation of this setup is narrow headspace; therefore, only young plant seedlings can be sampled. Most of the studies were performed with A. thaliana plants, because of its small size and its short life cycle. For other test plants and for attempts to use adult plants, bigger growth containers were designed (box systems) (Vaishnav et al. 2015) (Fig. 2.1b). In another approach, Park et al. (2015) inoculated Pseudomonas fluorescens SS101 in a plate which placed beneath the soil at the bottom of the pot. A filter is also placed above the plate to ensure that only VOCs could transfer between the plate and the soil. Tobacco seeds were sown onto the soil and after 4 weeks of sowing, the authors observed significant growth stimulation with an increase of fresh weight of tobacco.
2.10 Dynamic Air Stream Systems
In this system, a continue flow of purified air passed over bacterial culture plate and subsequently reached to targeted parts of plant (aerial/root) (Fig. 2.2). In this way, Kai and Piechulla (2009) performed experiment with S. plymuthica-derived VOCs by targeted aerial and roots of adult A. thaliana plants. For aerial part, they used a mini growth chamber in which VOCs enriched air directly reached from culture. For root, plants were kept in a perforated glass bowl and placed over a second glass bowl which attached with an air inlet. Air enriched with VOCs entered the lower compartment and reached to roots of the plants.
2.11 Characterization of Volatiles
The identification of volatiles is usually accomplished using gas chromatography coupled most often with mass spectrometry (GC-MS) in electron ionization mode (EI). The number of detectable volatiles in bacteria generally increases when various techniques are applied. Hence, multiple approaches are used in combination with GC-MS., e.g., headspace airflow systems with GC-MS, trapping materials – static solid-phase microextraction (SPME) with GC-MS, and proton transfer reaction/mass spectrometry (PTR-MS). Headspace volatiles can be collected through air flow onto an absorbent filter and released by rinsing the filter with organic solvent. On the other hand, VOCs can be collected by SPME and directly released into a heated GC injector. SPME can extract volatiles from bacterial cultures in a relatively short amount of time and has been successfully used to collect them in several systems (Farag et al. 2013). In SPME, fiber plays role in absorbing of compounds based on their polarity and size. In the case of rhizobacterial volatiles, divinylbenzene/carboxen/PDMS fibers are mainly used. These fibers adsorb polar low molecular weight VOCs, which are the predominant VOCs released from rhizobacteria. Proton transfer reaction mass spectrometry (PTR-MS) technique allows online VOC measurements. This technique is also combined with GC or time of flight (TOF). After MS analysis, compounds are identified by comparison of their mass spectral fragmentation patterns with mass spectra libraries such as WILEY and NIST. Several times the identification cannot be possible on the basis of mass spectral libraries alone. In such condition, retention indices, derivatization, and comparison with reference compound are better alternate to elucidate the compound structure.
2.12 The Effects of Bacterial Volatile Emissions on Plant Abiotic Stress Tolerance
During the last few years, an increasing number of PGPR VOCs studies have demonstrated an effect on induced systemic tolerance (IST) against abiotic stresses. Under high salt concentration, excessive sodium (Na+) creates both ionic and osmotic stresses in plants, leading to suppression of plant growth and reduction in crop yields. The entry of Na+ ion is controlled by several transporters in which high-affinity K+ transporter (HKT1) plays a major role. A soil bacterium Bacillus subtilis GB03-mediated VOCs has been reported to regulate HKT1 expression and conferred salt tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana. The expression of HKT1 was tissue specific, GB03 concurrently down- and upregulates HKT1 expression in roots and shoots respectively, resulting lower Na+ accumulation in the plant as compared with controls (Zhang et al. 2008). Plants adjust their endogenous metabolism to cope with osmotic and ionic stress. Bacterial VOC-mediated salt tolerance was reported in soybean plants; P. simiae strain AU released such VOCs that not only decreased root Na+ levels but also increased the accumulation of proline, which protect cells from osmotic stress. In addition, soybean plants showed higher level of vegetative storage protein (VSP), gamma-glutamyl hydrolase (GGH) and RuBisCo large-chain proteins that are known to help sustain plant growth under stress conditions (Vaishnav et al. 2015). P. simiae was found to emit 4-nitroguaiacol and quinolone compounds in the presence of nitric oxide donor sodium nitroprusside that were found to promote soybean seed germination under 100 mM NaCl. VOCs exposure induced antioxidative enzymes and nitrate reductase gene expression in soybean plants that relieve the negative effects of salt stress (Vaishnav et al. 2016). Paraburkholderia phytofirmans PsJN emitted 2-undecanone, 7-hexanol, 3-methylbutanol, and dimethyl disulfide compounds that directly effect on bacterial colonization, increasing plant growth rate and tolerance to salinity (Ledger et al. 2016).
Plants have their own mechanism to protect against osmotic stress. During drought condition, plant accumulates osmolytes and increase antioxidant activity to nullify the effect of osmotic stress outside the cell and reactive oxygen species inside the cell, respectively. Bacillus thuringiensis AZP2 and Paenibacillus polymyxa B primed wheat seeds showed enhanced tolerance against drought stress. Primed seeds were exhibited higher survivorship, dry mass, water use efficiency, and antioxidant enzyme activity. Three volatile compounds benzaldehyde, b-pinene, and geranyl acetone were found to emit from wheat seedlings and effective to mitigate early phases of stress development (Timmusk et al. 2014). In addition to adaptive responses, an increase in the plant hormones abscisic acid (ABA) and salicylic acid (SA) causes stomatal closure to minimize water loss through transpiration. In an experiment, root colonization of Arabidopsis plants with P. chlororaphis O6 induced tolerance to drought that was correlated with reduced water loss with stomatal closure. Drought tolerance was found to mediate by 2R, 3R-butanediol volatile compound produced by P. chlororaphis O6. In the lack of 2R, 3R-butanediol production, no induction of drought tolerance was found. Further study demonstrated free SA, NO, and hydrogen peroxide in P. chlororaphis O6-colonized drought-stressed plants which suggested a primary role of these signaling molecules in induced drought tolerance (Cho et al. 2008, 2013). In a VOC assay setup, Bacillus subtilis GB03 exposure increased an enzyme expression of choline synthesis phosphoethanolamine N-methyltransferase (PEAMT) resulting enhanced pool of choline and glycine-betaine in Arabidopsis plant under osmotic stress. Certain bacterial VOCs are involved in biofilm formation, which contain exopolysaccharides as major constituents, and these polysaccharides maintain soil moisture content and increase drought tolerance in plants (Naseem and Bano 2014).
Iron is a limiting nutrient for plants due to its minimal solubility in soils. Iron solubility decreased in the presence of high salt concentration. As a result, iron deficiency can occur in the plants and affect their metabolism. In a study, Bacillus subtilis GB03-mediated VOCs activate the plant’s iron acquisition machinery to increase assimilation of metal ions in Arabidopsis. GB03 VOCs upregulates gene expression of Fe-deficiency-induced transcription factor 1 (FIT1), which is necessary for two iron transporter induction FRO2 and IRT1. On the other hand, VOCs also enhanced the acidification media by enhancing root proton release, which increased iron mobility in plants (Zhang et al. 2009). Higher salt concentration also reduces sulfur (S) availability in the soil. Sulfur is an essential element in cysteine and methionine amino acids, and its deficiency represses the photosynthesis activity and productivity. Plant uptakes sulfur through soil or airborne compounds, including volatile compounds emitted by soil bacteria like dimethyl disulfide (DMDS). Emission of DMDS was found from a PGPR Bacillus sp. B55, which enhanced the S content in Nicotiana attenuata plants grown in S-deficient soils or impaired S uptake/assimilation/metabolism (Meldasu et al. 2013).
2.13 Conclusion and Future Prospective
This chapter reports the potential role of bacterial VOCs as airborne signals in plant interaction with beneficial effects. In many reports, bacterial VOCs enable plants to adapt to various environmental stresses and ultimately enhance plant growth. Despite that, many aspects of VOC interaction with plants are still poorly characterized. The combined analysis of metabolic and gene expression profiles will likely be an increasingly powerful approach to identifying the mechanism of plant perception for bacterial VOCs. Moreover, systematic use of radiolabeled VOC compounds will reveal how plants assimilate VOC components as metabolites. The question of how bacteria respond to diverse environment to produce VOCs could be addressed by screening of compounds based on different parameters, as well as by monitoring transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic changes in response to different environments.
References
Audrain B, Farag MA, Ryu C-M, Ghigo J-M (2015) Role of bacterial volatile compounds in bacterial biology. FEMS Microbiol Rev 39:222–233
Blom D, Fabbri C, Connor EC, Schiestl FP, Klauser DR, Boller T et al (2011) Production of plant growth modulating volatiles is widespread among rhizosphere bacteria and strongly depends on culture conditions. Environ Microbiol 13:3047–3058
Cho SM, Kang BR, Han SH, Anderson AJ, Park JY, Lee YH et al (2008) 2R,3R-butanediol, a bacterial volatile produced by Pseudomonas chlororaphis O6, is involved in induction of systemic tolerance to drought in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 21:1067–1075
Cho SM, Kim YH, Anderson AJ, Kim YC (2013) Nitric oxide and hydrogen peroxide production are involved in systemic drought tolerance induced by 2R, 3R-butanediol in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Pathol J 29:427–434
Farag MA, Zhang H, Ryu CM (2013) Dynamic chemical communication between plants and bacteria through airborne signals: induced resistance by bacterial volatiles. J Chem Ecol 39:1007–1018
Fernando WGD, Ramarathnam R, Krishnamoorthy AS, Savchuk SC (2005) Identification and use of potential bacterial organic antifungal volatiles in biocontrol. Soil Biol Biochem 37:955–964
Groenhagen U, Baumgartner R, Bailly et al (2013) Production of bioactive volatiles by different Burkholderia ambifaria strains. J Chem Ecol 39:892–906
Hamilton-Kemp T, Newman M, Collins R et al (2005) Production of the long-chain alcohols octanol, decanol, and dodecanol by Escherichia coli. Curr Microbiol 51:82–86
Kai M, Piechulla B (2009) Plant growth promotion due to rhizobacterial volatiles – an effect of CO2? FEBS Lett 583:3473–3477
Kai M, Effmert U, Piechulla (2016) Bacterial plant interactions: approaches to unravel the biological function of bacterial volatiles in the rhizosphere. Front Microbiol 7:108
Ledger T, Rojas S, Timmermann T, Pinedo I, Poupin MJ, Garrido T, Richter P, Tamayo J, Donoso R (2016) Volatile-mediated effects predominate in Paraburkholderia phytofirmans growth promotion and salt stress tolerance of Arabidopsis thaliana. Front Microbiol 7:18388
Lee B, Farag MA, Park HB, Kloepper JW et al (2012) Induced resistance by a long-chain bacterial volatile: elicitation of plant systemic defense by a C13 volatile produced by Paenibacillus polymyxa. PLoS One 7:1–11
Marilley L, Casey MG (2004) Flavours of cheese products: metabolic pathways, analytical tools and identification of producing strains. Int J Food Microbiol 90:139–159
Meldau DG, Meldau S, Hoang LH, Underberg S, Wunsche H, Baldwin IT (2013) Dimethyl disulfide produced by the naturally associated bacterium Bacillus sp B55 promotes Nicotiana attenuata growth by enhancing sulphur nutrition. Plant Cell 25:2731–2747
Naseem H, Bano A (2014) Role of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria and their exopolysaccharide in drought tolerance of maize. J Plant Interact 9:689–701
Park YS, Dutta S, Ann M, Raaijmakers JM et al (2015) Promotion of plant growth by Pseudomonas fluorescens strain SS101 via novel volatile organic compounds. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 461:361–365
Perry LG, Alford ER, Horiuchi J, Paschke MW, Vivanco JM (2007) Chemical signals in the rhizosphere: root-root and root-microbe communication. In: Pinton R, Varanini Z, Nannipi P (eds) The rhizosphere. Biochemistry and organic substances at the soil-plant interface, 2nd edn. CRC press, Taylor and Francis Group, Boca Raton, pp 297–330
Ryu CM, Farag MA, Hu C-H, Reddy MS et al (2004) Bacterial volatiles induce systemic resistance in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 134:1017–1026
Tenorio-Salgado S, Tinoco R, Vazquez-Duhalt R, Caballero-Mellado J et al (2013) Identification of volatile compounds produced by the bacterium Burkholderia tropica that inhibit the growth of fungal pathogens. Bioengineering 4:236–243
Timmusk S, Abd El-Daim IA, Copolovici L, Tanilas T, Ka¨nnaste A et al (2014) Drought-tolerance of wheat improved by rhizosphere bacteria from harsh environments: enhanced biomass production and reduced emissions of stress volatiles. PLoS One 9(5):e96086
Vaishnav A, Kumari S, Jain S, Varma A, Choudhary DK (2015) Putative bacterial volatile-mediated growth in soybean (Glycine max L. Merrill) and expression of induced proteins under salt stress. J Appl Microbiol 119:539–551
Vaishnav A, Kumari S, Jain S, Varma A, Tuteja N, Choudhary DK (2016) PGPR mediated expression of salt tolerance gene in soybean through volatiles under sodium nitroprusside. J Basic Microbiol 56:1–15
Vaishnav A, Varma A, Tuteja N, Choudhary DK (2017) PGPR-mediated amelioration of crops under salt stress. In: Choudhary DK, Varma A, Tuteja N (eds) Plant-microbe interaction: an approach to sustainable agriculture. Springer, Singapore. ISBN:978-981-10-2854-0
Voisard C, Keel C, Haas D, Dèfago G (1989) Cyanide production by Pseudomonas fluorescens helps suppress black root rot of tobacco under gnotobiotic conditions. EMBO J 8(2):351–358
Wenke K, Kai M, Piechulla B (2010) Belowground volatiles facilitate interactions between plant roots and soil organisms. Planta 231:499–506
Zhang H, Kim MS, Sun Y, Dowd SE et al (2008) Soil bacteria confer plant salt tolerance by tissue-specific regulation of the sodium transporter HKT1. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 21:737–744
Zhang H, Sun Y, Xie X, Kim MS, Dowd SE, Paré PW (2009) A soil bacteria regulates plant acquisition of iron via deficiency-inducible mechanisms. Plant J 58:568–577
Acknowledgments
Authors are very thankful to DBT and SERB for financial assistance.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Vaishnav, A., Varma, A., Tuteja, N., Choudhary, D.K. (2017). Characterization of Bacterial Volatiles and Their Impact on Plant Health Under Abiotic Stress. In: Choudhary, D., Sharma, A., Agarwal, P., Varma, A., Tuteja, N. (eds) Volatiles and Food Security. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5553-9_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5553-9_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-5552-2
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-5553-9
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)