Abstract
A rapid development has been witnessed since the birth of this miniaturized analytical equipment about forty years ago. And microfluidics, a discipline studying the manipulation and analysis of micro volume sample is also attracting the attention of academics with the annually increasing publications. At present, microfluidic device has become a powerful platform with diverse functions implicated in the fields of cellular biology, environmental study, food safety monitoring and micro synthesis, and has crossed the barrier of academic study into the daily life of normal customers. In this chapter, we will focus on several aspects concerning the design and fabrication of microfluidic devices, such as the development of device material, different methods of chip fabrication and functional units to realize purpose of intention. And in the end of this part, a brief future perspective is given to evaluate the potential applications of microfluidic device, especially with other portal devices like smart phone.
Access provided by CONRICYT-eBooks. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
1.1 Introduction
Microfluidic devices are termed as micro total analysis system (μTAS) or laboratory on a chip (LOC), with the first reported work dating back to 1975. A gas chromatography at micro scale was reported then [1]. However, the academics did not respond actively to the new-born of this epoch-marking device firstly, but rather turned indifference to it with no follow up studies in a long term. Not until 1990s did the microfluidics device start to receive broad attention. The rapid development of integrated circuit processing technique and computer industrial, along with the urgent demand of bio-molecules separation devices redirected analytical devices to a path of miniaturization. Manz and coworkers designed an open-channel liquid chromatography based on microfabricated silicon chip in 1990 [2]. It is noteworthy that Manz is also the proposer of μTAS concept [3]. In this work, the authors displayed integrated functions of sample pretreatment, separation and detection on one chip. In the last 20 years, researches concerning novel microfabrication strategies [4], development of new chip material [5] and application of microchip to detection [6, 7] have been increasingly studied and published. And microfluidic chip has become a multi-functional platform for various targets analysis (Fig. 1.1a) [8] and a powerful tool for biomedical applications (Fig. 1.1b) [9].
The advantages of applying microfluidic devices to analytical testing include: less consumption of reagents and samples, rapid reaction in microscale chamber , high integration allowing for high-throughput parallel test, miniaturization for good portability, diverse chip designs for various functioning intentions, and precise control of cell culturing environment in cell in vitro models. The processing technique of microfluidic chip originated from the semi-conductor industrial, and was further developed by micro-electromechanical systems fabrication. The wide utilization of microfluidic chip in research fields is benefiting from its analytical ability and manipulation of microscale objects. The fluids dynamics in micro scale is distinct from macro world (Fig. 1.2a) [7]. A variant as Re is used to interpret the characteristics of flow in micro regions. The connection of Re with fluid properties as well as channel dimensions is illustrated in following equation:
where ρ represents fluid density (kg/m3), v stands for average linear velocity (m/s), d for the dimension of channel and μ for fluid viscosity. When Re is larger than 2000, the main characteristic of flow is turbulent with vortexes happening. For cases when Re is smaller than 1, the flow is steady and laminar. In micro channels, Re is basically among the section belonging to laminar flow due to the miniaturized channel dimensions, thus making the flow highly predictable. Lack of convection leads to slow fluid mixing by diffusion. Another difference in microfluidic region is that gravity no longer dominates the object motion as it does in macro world. Surface interfacial tension and capillary forces become two major influencing factors of objects behaviors [10, 11]. Besides, there are Dean flow induced inertia forces (Fig. 1.2b) [12] which can be used for particle focusing (Fig. 1.2c) [12] and enhancing mixing process (Fig. 1.2d) [13].
One of the big future developments for microfluidic chip is to design and prepare function oriented chip prototypes with optimized and facile fabrication steps. And generally, the basic rule for chip design rests in taking the maximum advantage of microscale fluid physics to realize analytical test as well as objects manipulation. Therefore various functional units were invented and integrated into microchip along with its development, such as surface tension valve [14], concentration gradient generator [15, 16] and droplet nozzle [17,18,19]. To match up the micro analytical system, popular detection methods like fluorescent [20], electrochemical [21, 22] and MS [23, 24] detectors as well as other biosensors [25, 26] were combined to the microchip. In material selection, the choice for chip fabrication evolved from inorganic material of silicon and glass to elastomer, thermoset and thermoplastic, and again further to the paper based and other functional hybrid materials. At present, the microfluidic device has become one of the most popular research tools in analytical chemistry and bio-analytical fields with frequent applications in environmental pollutants analysis [27, 28], food safety [29, 30], disease diagnosis [31, 32] and construction of cell in vitro culture model [33,34,35].
However, it has to be admitted that the commercialization of microfluidic devices is not successful despite of its broad application in academics and research institutes [36]. Reason for this mediocrity is that comparing to other maturely established detection methods, microfluidic devices are still short of some killer applications, which makes researchers prefer conventional assays than microchips [37]. On the other hand, the microfluidics commercialization is also limited by the difficulties in mass production. The realization of specific functions on chip requires specifically designed chip structure, and it would be overly difficult to format a universal chip model for all kinds of purposes. Commonly researchers would design and prepare homemade chips themselves, especially after the widely utilization of PDMS as a replacement for glass and silicon in chip fabrication and the acceptance of facial and cheap soft lithography as standard preparation methods. In 2013, the market scale of microfluidic devices was about 1.6 billion dollars, with compound annual growth rate of 18–29% to a predicted size of 3.6–5.7 billion dollars in 2018 [38]. The rapid development of this industrial is largely depending on the fast expansion of genome sequencing [39, 40] and in vitro diagnosis applications.
In this chapter, we will have a detailed discussion about the development of microfluidic devices materials and fabrication methods. The design of functional units as well as the field’s prospect will also be covered.
1.2 Development of Microfluidic Chip Material
At the primitive stage of microfluidic chip, glass and silicon were the basic materials for chip fabrication. With the invention of new materials and improvement of processing technique, a flood of materials were applied in microchip preparation(Fig. 1.3a) [41]. Currently, the chip materials can be roughly divided into three categories as polymers (Fig. 1.3b) [42], inorganic(Fig. 1.3c) [43] and paper based materials (Fig. 1.3d) [44]. And the material properties are among the basic considering factors for material selection, such as air tightness, biocompatibility, conductivity, transparency and solvent tolerance. For example, glass and silicon are with good stability and highly tolerant to solvents, while the polymer materials have poor resist to solvents, and become partly dissolved or even disintegrate among organic solvents. Besides, the choice of material should also meet the requirement from chip miniaturization and integration. In laboratory environment, the major concern of researchers is how to realize rapid prototype of newly designed chip model and conduct performance testing, but for commercial intention lowing the fabrication cost of product and improving the reliability during usage would be more important. Next, we will have a closer look of the material development history.
1.2.1 Inorganic Material in Chip Preparation
The earliest type of microfluidic device such as miniaturized gas [1] or liquid chromatography [2] and capillary electrophoresis devices was prepared by glass and silicon, under the processing technique inherited from semiconductor and microelectronics industrials [45]. The advantages of glass and silicon chip are fine chemical stability in high temperature, good strength and thermal conductivity and processability for nano-resolution surface patterns [46, 47].
Silicon is the first material which has been used in microfluidics devices, but was once being replaced by glass and polymers. With excellent thermal conductivity, the use of silicon in some devices is intended to achieve a uniform distribution of temperature [48]. The modification of silicon is easy through the reaction between silylating reagent and silicon hydroxyl exposed on surface [49]. Silicon material has been widely applied in the manufacture of complex 3D structures such as micro reaction chamber [50, 51], cell culture unit [52,53,54], electrospray nozzle [55] and solvent extraction device [56]. However, the weakness of silicon chip is also significant. Due to lack of elasticity, it is hard to produce flow control elements like pump and valve from silicon. The opacity of material makes optical detection almost incompatible with silicon chip. But still the weakness can be circumvented by comprising hybrid microchip with transparent and elastic material. It is safe to conclude that because of the very appearance of hybrid material chip, the application of silicon in microfuidics is once again expanded.
As contrast, glass is highly transparent with low fluorescence background, which allows for combination with real-time monitoring methods. The thermal conductivity of glass is relatively poor and has been utilized in generation of temperature gradients on device. Fluid flow in glass channel is witnessed with rare non-specific absorption and the modification of glass through silicon hydroxyl reaction is also easy. The air tightness of glass makes it unsuitable for long term cell culture. Glass is well-known for its role as channel material in capillary and chip electrophoresis [57]. Benefiting from high material electroosmotic mobility, fluid in glass capillary is driven by strong electroosmotic flow without the need for external pumping device and being rapidly mixed at good reproducibility. In addition, glass is widely applied in PCR equipment [58] and gas chromatography [59].
Currently, the main processing techniques of glass and silicon material include:
-
(a)
Standard photolithography [60] . Firstly, photoresist is spin coated to form a thin layer over the surface of glass or silicon, and then exposed to UV radiation against predesigned mask. Next, the patterns transferred from photo mask is developed by developer solution to reveal bare glass or silicon surface for further etching step. The exposed surface is etched by hydrofluoric acid solution for a concave channel. After removal of the photoresist, channels are finally sealed to a plain surface.
-
(b)
Surface micromachining . As shown in Fig. 1.4a, the fabrication involves steps of patterning sacrificial layer on material surface, casting of amorphous material over the sacrificial layer to form structural layer and etching of sacrificial layer to achieve the corresponding channels [61]. Comparing to other processing methods, surface micromachining is more capable in fabricating multi-layer devices (Fig. 1.4b) and nano channel due to the minimum thickness of sacrificial layer to a few nano meters [62, 63]. Because multiple steps are required, this machining method would take a long time to finish. Figure 1.4c presents micro featured devices fabricated by surface machining [64].
-
(c)
Buried-channel techniques. In this method, a tunnel is carved through anisotropic deep reactive ion etching (DRIE) in vertical direction. Then the tunnel walls are blocked by chemical vapor deposition (CVD) only leaving a reaction site for further etching to form a cylinder-shaped channel [65,66,67]. This method is particularly suitable for preparation of high aspect radio channel.
-
(d)
Bulk micromachining. Bulk micromachining is a common micro fabrication method usually employed in preparing micro or nano scale channels [68, 69]. Formation of channel is realized due to the different etching rates for different lattice planes of silicon substrate in electrochemical corrosion. The channel depth is regulated by controlling the etching time, but the accuracy is often unsatisfactory. Another etching method with better accuracy is to dope boron into selected regions, where after doping slower etching rate is witnessed. However the doping process might cause stress in structure and lead to easy break.
-
(e)
Laser direct writing (LDW) . Laser direct writing is a method of fabrication employing laser beam to carve channels directly specially for photosensitive glass material [70,71,72].
-
(f)
Electrochemical micromachining. Electrochemical machining was firstly used in aerospace industrial half century ago, and when it was optimized and adapted for fabrication at micro scale region, a feasible method for micro structure building was born. Electrochemical micromachining utilizes cathode and anode to simultaneously and electrically depositing and electrolyzing material at the same time, and was suitable for processing silicon (Fig. 1.5a, b) [73] and metallic (Fig. 1.5c) [74] material. Combined with computer controlled processor or scanning tunneling microscopy (Fig. 1.5d) [75], high-resolution and three dimensional patterns can be made on material surface with micro scales or even lower dimension (Fig. 1.5e) [76].
Generally the processing steps for glass and silicon based microchip include etching, bonding and connecting to external equipment, and the etching resolution determines the smallest structure that could be achieved on glass and silicon. For glass, wet etching by hydrofluoric acid has been frequently used and resulted in arc shape of the channel side walls [77]. Other etching methods such as plasma etching would be slow and hard to control. For silicon, method of reactive ion beam etching is well established and has been applied in monocrystalline silicon processing to form channels with vertical side walls [78, 79]. Judging from processability of glass and silicon, the disadvantages of their application in chip preparation are high material cost, tedious fabrication steps, employment of dangerous chemical reagents, high standards of bonding condition for chip seal such as high temperature and pressure and ultra-clean environment. Moreover, functional structures like microvalve are hard to be integrated into glass or silicon microchips, which would require additional use of PDMS to assemble hybrid chip. There are other inorganic materials that have been reported in the preparation of microchip, such as low-temperature co-fired ceramic (LTCC) [80, 81], but we will not have a detailed discussion here.
1.2.2 Silicon Elastomer
Polymer materials have been frequently applied to microfluidic devices since 2000s [82, 83]. Comparing to inorganic material, polymers are finely processable and castable, cheap in cost and amendable for mass production. The molecular structure of polymer is variable, and by facile modification its chemical properties can be easily regulated. Polymers applied in chip preparation can be roughly classified into three types, silicon elastomer, thermoset and thermoplastic material.
In the last decade, PDMS has become the primary choice for microfluidics device fabrication [84, 85]. Elastomer allows for rapid prototype of microchip model and assembling with glass substrate for a transparent device. The elasticity makes possible the integration of micro pump and valve into one chip [86,87,88,89]. Through placing PDMS layer by layer, complex chip structures can be realized.
Elastomer casting technique was invented by Bell group in 1970s [90], and firstly applied to microfluidic devices in 1980s [91]. After Whitesides reported the PDMS chip fabrication through soft lithography in late 1990s [92], soft lithography as well as PDMS has been broadly accepted by researchers and become a primary chip preparation method. In soft lithography, liquid elastomer is polymerized at a mild temperature condition (40–70 ℃), which lowers the infrastructure requirement for laboratory use. The resolution of mold-casting method can reach nano scale, and owing to the small surface tension of PDMS, casted chip device can be easily peeled from photoresist template with good integrity [93, 94]. By simple physical attachment, PDMS channels can be reversibly sealed to another PDMS, glass or other surface. With the assistance of thin layer PDMS as adhering agent or plasma surface treatment, PDMA chip can be irreversibly sealed to another PDMS or glass substrate. Comparing to air tight materials such as glass, silicon, PMMA and PC, PDMS is permeable to gas and permits exchange of oxygen and carbon dioxide in cell culture model [95]. Also the hydrophobic surface of PDMS makes it preferable for cell adhesion [96].
Advantages mentioned above as well as cheap material cost account for the broad application of PDMS in cell biology researches such as cell screening [97], culture [98, 99] and biochemical analysis [100]. And the ability of microfluidics to process samples in nano or pico liter enables the building of single cell analysis platform by PDMS microchips with integration of functional units like micropump and microvalve [101].
However the limits of PDMS are also apparent. Hydrophobic surface of PDMS increases the chances of non-specific absorption of drug components and biomolecules [102]. Although surface treatment by plasma or corona discharge will temporarily reduce this unwanted effect, the treatment often does not last long [103]. From the view of molecular structure, PDMS is a porous bulk with Si-O chains as skeleton and alkyl groups covering all over it. Therefore, PDMS is extremely vulnerable to organic solvent, and the application of PDMS is only for aqueous system. The air permeability benefits gas exchange but also causes the volatilization of water through micro channel and alternates the solution concentration. Besides, when fabricating channels of high aspect ratio, the flexibility of PDMS material would be more likely to induce channel collapse. The operation condition of PDMS chip has to be mild in prevention of unrecoverable deformation. And due to the existing uncertainties between different baths that may influence product quality, PDMS has been excluded from commercialization.
Substitutions of PDMS are applied to chip manufacture to overcome some disadvantages. For example, perfluoro polymers were introduced for great inertness and anti-fouling properties [104], and hydrogels were used in 3D cell culture matrix and concentration gradient generator [105, 106].
1.2.3 Thermoset and Thermoplastic Materials
Thermoset material was employed in soft lithography as photo resist before it was assumed as device building material. When being heated or radiated, molecules inside thermoset will cross link to form rigid structure, which can’t be reshaped once accomplished. Normally, thermoset materials are transparent, stable at high temperature and tolerant of most solvents. Microfluidic chip can be prepared by sole material of thermoset via proper bonding technique [107, 108]. Thermoset materials are proper candidates for constructing complex microstructures through photo initiated polymerization, and the high rigidity permits implement of extreme aspect-ratio channels. However, the high rigidity also makes it impossible to integrate membrane based microvalve on chip. Common thermoset materials include thermoset polyester (TPE) and epoxy plastics.
Different from thermoset polymers, thermoplastics can be shaped and reshaped repeatedly at high temperature. The raw material of thermoplastics is at solid phase when purchased, and when being heated to its glass phase transition temperature, the material is significantly softer and suitable for next fabrication process. Thermoplastics is widely used in modern industrial, typical products of thermoplastics include PMMA, PC, PS, PET, PVC and perfluorinated compounds. Application of Teflon PFA and FEP to the fabrication of microfluidics devices has been reported [109, 110]. Teflon is well resistant to the harmful impact from solvents and chemical reagents, and flexible with good transparency, which can be used for microvalve integration on chip. Generally, thermoplastics have a better tolerance to solvents than PDMS, but are still vulnerable to organic solvents such as ketone and alkanes. The air tightness limits long term cell culture on thermoplastics. Through thermomolding, mass production of thermoplastics based devices can be realized at low cost, which is favored by the commercial companies. However, utilization of thermoplastics in laboratory is limited by the infrastructures of expensive metal or silicon template. Whitesides and Xia developed a method of transferring patterns from photo resist template to thermoplastics by using PDMS as intermediary material [111]. Restricted by the mild operating condition of PDMS, this method is feasible only with materials of transition temperature lower than 150 ℃.
Thermal bonding and adhesive agent assisted sealing are two major packaging methods for thermoplastics, and the operating condition is much milder comparing to glass material. Surface modification of thermoplastics can endure a long time by covalent reaction. For example, the surface hydrophilicity of thermoplastics can last for years after plasma treatment [112].
1.2.4 Hydrogel Material
The skeleton of bulk hydrogel is formed by entangling hydrophilic polymer chains in three dimensions, and there are water molecules occupying nearly 99% of the material space [113]. The porous structures inside hydrogel permit diffusion of small molecules and bio-molecules. Owing to the similarity of hydrogel to extracellular matrix in properties such as permeability and mechanical strength, hydrogels are frequently applied in cell encapsulation and in vitro culture model. However, long-term culture scale is still limited by the effective diffusion distance of nutrients and oxygens, and requires more precisely controlled culturing conditions. The application of hydrogels as supporting material for vascular mimicry model was reported [114], and enhancement of mass transportation was observed [115].
Though hydrogels are generally biocompatible, there are different affinities to cell adhering of different gel materials. For example, animal derived gels such as matrigel and collagen contain factors enhancing cell proliferation, while plant derived gels like alginate and agarose and other synthesized polymers like PEG and polyacrylamide are lack of adhering points for cells. The deficiency of less cell adhering affinity can be overcome by simple grafting modification.
Hydrogel is a low-density soft material, and therefore not ideal for high-resolution manufacturing. The minimum texture in hydrogel is currently at micro scale. Major processing techniques for hydrogel based fabrication include LDW and 3D printing. Due to the mild gelating condition of hydrogel, the only requirement of employed mold template is insolubility in aqueous system. But real problem of gel based devices is the difficulty of sealing. Hydrogels are widely applied in the fields of 3D cell culture and tissue engineering [116, 117].
1.2.5 Paper Based Microfluidic Devices
Microfluidic paper based analytical devices (μPADs) is an emerging field in rapid development (Fig. 1.6a–f) [118,119,120,121,122,123]. Whitesides group reported the first paper microchip in 2007 [124], while the prototype of its design can be dated back to 1940s, when Muller and Clegg proposed a method of pH testing by filter paper strips [125]. Muller patterned micro channels on filter paper through paraffin coating and observed plant pigment diffusion and separation over the channel after sample addition of different pigments mix. This very micro channel can be regarded as the embryo of μPADs. Till now, the applications of paper based devices have expanded to disease diagnosis [126], environmental monitoring [127, 128] and food safety control [129]. Rapid development of paper based devices is based on their unique advantages: cheap and easily obtained materials with flexibility (Fig. 1.6g) [130] and biocompatibility, facile disposal by burning or burying, porous structures and large specific surface area of paper for analytes filtering, transportation and separation, convenient surface modification and patterning by wax coating or covalent reaction, inherent white background for colorimetric detection. Besides, when operating paper based analytical devices, liquids are passively driven by capillary effect without necessity of connecting to external pump, which makes it a proper candidate for portable device fabrication. Functional reagents can be preserved on paper with post bake after addition.
At present, the major directions of equipment development lay on the facile and convenient chip preparation methods and novel chip based test for important biomarkers . Common processing techniques for paper based microchips include lithography [131], inkjet modification [132], plasma treatment [133], direct cutting, patterned wax coating [134], flexographic printing [135], silk-screen printing [136] and laser processing [137]. And the principles are basically the same, which include the formation of hydrophobic/hydrophilic contrast area and restricting liquid flows in predefined microchannels . Normally, the width of micro paper channel is about several hundred or thousand micrometers, and due to the hydrophilicity of paper surface, hydrophobic reagent is employed in paper modification. According to the different cost of surface modification, hydrophobic reagents can be classified into three categories: expensive ones as SU-8 photo resist (modifying 100 cm2 requires 0.1 dollars), cheaper ones as wax (modifying 100 cm2 requires 0.01 dollars) and the cheapest ones like alkyl ketene dimer (modifying 100 cm2 requires 0.00001 dollars). And modification principles can also be differentiated as physical block of surface porous structures, deposition of hydrophobic layer and chemical regulation of surface property. Modification by chemical reactions can be hardly removed by solvent dissolving, while physical deposition on surface is vulnerable to organic solvents, which is utilized in channel formation on paper based devices.
The processing techniques for surface modification include hydrophobic coating in predesigned patterns such as wax printing and ink jet printing, and overall coating followed by selective removal of coating material through lithography , microfluidics methods and region confined plasma treatment. Currently, the most frequently used methods are ink jet printing of AKD reagents and wax coating. Common advantages shared by these two techniques are low in cost, easy to control and short fabrication periods.
Detection methods accommodated with paper based microfluidic chips include colorimetric, electrochemical, chemiluminescence and electrochemiluminescence detections. Among all these methods, colorimeter has been often applied to qualitative and semi-quantitative testing due to its direct observation by raw eyes of the reaction products under enzymes catalyzed systems [138]. And because of no requirement of external equipment, colorimetric methods have also become well commercialized to ready-to-use products (Fig. 1.6h) [139]. Electrochemical methods have high sensitivity which is capable for quantitative detection of substances as low amount as nM level. Besides, the application of electrochemical detection can also effectively avoid the interference from other colored matters in detection matrix [140]. Studying from the published works, the major detection methods employed in paper based devices are colorimetric and electrochemical, while in few works chemiluminescenceand electrochemiluminescence were applied.
Future development directions for paper based devices lay on the studies of inventing cheap, easily-handled and portal devices to help improve diseases diagnosis, especially in the developed regions which suffer from the lack of infrastructures and trained medical workers. Also development of quantitative detecting papers of multiple targets on the basis of current qualitative and semi-quantitative test papers is in avid demand. At present, the functional test papers can be roughly divided into two types: on demand devices and ready to use devices. Different reacting reagents can be added to the former ones according to different target substances, while for the latter ones, specific reagents for single target test have been placed into the paper in advance and simple sample addition can lead to detection results.
To reinforce the detection capability of paper based devices, integration of different functional units is needed, such as sample separation channel and reaction chambers . The development of 3D paper chip has allowed the transportation of solution not only inside 2D plane, but also in vertical directions [141]. The simplest method for 3D paper chip fabrication is physical folding and overlaying of 2D paper chip. Comparing to 2D chips, the appearance of 3D chips has largely increase the device detection throughput, where each layer can be designed to implement analysis for one specific substance. Of course, one popular application for paper chip is as supportive material for cell biology related researches. For example, paper chip has been applied as 3D cell culture matrix for in vitro model construction [142].
As it is said, every coin has two sides. The limited factors for paper based devices including:
-
(a)
The diffusion and carryover of sample inside paper would significantly decrease the valid concentration of target for detection. Also open channels on paper would enhance water volatilization and harm sample transportation. Normally, amount of sample reaching detection area is no more than 50% of the sample addition.
-
(b)
For fluids with low surface tensions (bio-sample containing surfactant, for example), hydrophobic modification on surface is not enough to confine sample solution inside predesigned channels. In this situation, sample channeling is not effective by controlling surface hydrophilicity/hydrophobicity.
-
(c)
Frequently used in conventional methods, microfluidic hydrodynamics such as laminar and micro droplet technology can’t be accommodated to paper devices. Micro structures like micro valves are unable to be integrated into paper chip.
-
(d)
Detection limit of colorimetric method is not low enough for trace amount pollutants in drinking water, which is usually in ppb or ppt level.
1.2.6 Hybrid Material Chip
When single material is unable to fulfill all the technique requirements to realize device function, coupling different types of materials in one microchip should be considered. We term the chip which extensively employs two or more types of materials the hybrid chip. Design of hybrid chip should following the principle that combined materials can’t antagonize each other, but serve as complements to improve over all properties. One typical example of the hybrid chip includes glass as substrate and PDMS as channel and microvalve formatting material in one microchip [143,144,145]. There are also other examples such as glass channel and electrode substrate [146], and microchannel embedded with hydro gel to eliminate bulk flow while preserving diffusion.
1.3 Chip Fabrication
We have had a brief introduction about the chip materials and different fabrication methods that vary according to material as mentioned above. Next, we shall supplement some frequently used chip fabricating methods to make it more complete.
1.3.1 Soft Lithography
After the elastomer became the major material for microfluidic devices preparation, its fabrication methods have also been developed since. Currently the basic method for PDMS chip preparation is soft lithography. Soft lithography was invented in the late 1990s by Whiteside’s group [92], and its principle originated from standard lithography which is employed for glass and silicon chip preparation. In standard lithography, glass or silicon surface is covered with a layer of photo resist, which is selectively exposed to UV radiation and developed. The bare surface without photo resist covering is vulnerable to chemical etching, and thus ready for channel formation. For soft lithography, elastomer is mold-casted to a photo resist template standing on silicon base. After elastomer solidification under hours’ heating, the whole PDMS bulk is peeled from the template and sealed to a glass substrate. Main processing steps of soft lithography include: UV mask design, photo resist spin-coating on silicon wafer, exposure to UV and development, mold-casting and sealing. With the advantages of low infrastructure cost and simple operation, soft lithography has been widely applied in laboratories of universities and institutes to achieve fast prototype of chip model. However, the disadvantages are multiple processing steps. From preliminary design to real products, it often requires several hours to days to cover a single fabrication period. If the mold chip couldn’t pass performance testing, preparation would have to restart over from design, which makes a great liability on time and labor. Limited to the lithography principle, some three-dimensional structures are unable to be formed. In the aspect of resolution, no matter the specific lithography processing steps, the final resolution is always limited by diffraction effect. Slight differences may be observed by using different masking technologies. For example, resolution of contact photolithography is about 0.5 μm but 0.3 μm for projection photolithography [4]. Generally, microchip prepared by lithography can meet the requirement of micro volume bio-sample analysis, but when more precisely controlled structure feature is needed, electron beam etching or nano imprint lithography may be necessary. Both of these methods can lower down resolution to below 100 nm, but with heavy cost of equipment and time.
1.3.2 Fabrication of Extended-Nano Channels
The scale of extended-nano channel (10–100 nm) lies between the conventional nanotechnology (1–10 nm) and microtechnology (>1 μm). In the past, researches concerning fluid properties at extended-nano scale were limited by the lack of appropriate tools. Extended-nano channel is too large for bottom-up synthesis or assembling from atoms or molecules of nanotechnology, and too precise for micromachining of microtechnology. Therefore, specialized methods are required to study channels at extended-nano scale. Focused ion beam milling and electron beam lithography have become alternatives to traditional photo lithography and applied to nano channel formation(Fig. 1.7a) [147]. These methods are able to realize precise nanomachining in selected regions, but unsuitable for large scale and high throughput fabrication. Focused ion beam milling mainly uses gallium ion beam to directly carve 2D nano channels on silicon or fused silica. Normally, the formed extended-nano channel is embed and connected with surrounding microchannels to constitute complete flow system. The microchannels are intended for solution supply.
In electron beam lithography , electron resist and conductive polymer are spin coated to quartz wafer respectively. Nano patterns are created by electron beam drawing without the requirement of photo mask. Then with the coupled plasma and chemical vapors treatment, extended-nano channels are achieved on substrate. And chip sealing is accomplished by thermal bonding with or without external pressure. In addition, laser direct writing can also be applied for fabrication of extended-nano channels(Fig. 1.7b) [148].
1.3.3 3D Printing Technology
3D printing technology firstly appeared in the 1980s [149], but subject to expensive equipment, limited printing material and few choices of printing nozzle, the application of 3D printing technology in microfluidics was only restricted to chip prototype and exploring fabrication methods. Thirsty years since then, as the development of technology and decrease of equipment and material cost, 3D printing has not only been widely employed to the researches of various disciplines in laboratory, but also come to the daily life of ordinary customers. Customer grade 3D printing device has now been successfully commercialized with price at 1000 dollars [150].
3D printing is a highly precise manufacturing method, enabling facile and easy preparation of complex 3D structures. Comparing to conventional microfluidic device fabrication methods like lithography and micromachining, 3D printing is simpler in operation, enables full automation and on-step fabrication of microchip. 3D printing spares the design of UV mask, and testing performances can be directly used as reference for design optimization, thus increasing the speed of experience based modifying. At present, the choice of materials for 3D printing is broadly extended, and materials from polymers to various bio substances such as cells [151] can be printed.
3D printing is also called additive manufacturing (ASTM F2792), that is, device manufacture by continuous addition of new material to substrate. Commonly, steps of 3D printing include:
(a) Building 3D model of target object on CAD or other engineering drawing software. (b) Transferring the model data to 3D printing devices where 3D model is sliced to be successive 2D layers. The final amount of 2D slices is determined by the resolution of 3D printing devices, and normally printing resolution can be smaller than 10 μm.
(c) Layer by layer 3D printing of material to rebuild the 3D features of model objects. (d) In construction of some structures, post-processing is needed to remove the supporting frames or other exogenous materials. 3D printing devices are equipped with precise positioning and delivering modules, which can build structures of any shape in 3D space theoretically, like curved surface, slope and irregular shape that can’t be prepared by other methods.
According to different printing material and polymerization methods, principles of 3D printing can be further classified as stereolithography (SLA) (Fig. 1.8a, b), fused deposition method (FDM) (Fig. 1.8c), electron beam melting (EBM) and bio-printers , the first two of which have been well exemplified [152].
1.3.3.1 Stereolithography
Stereolithography was the principle of both the first proposed 3D printing device and the first batch of commercialized products of 3D printing, and still the most widely used and successful models. In 1988, Chuck Hull invented the first 3D printing device by using UV laser to initiate liquid resin polymerization and localized solidification. The vertical dimension of object was expanded by the lifting of carrier platform. During printing, fresh resin was painted to the section and then shaped by laser beam. And above procedures were repeated until the recapitulation of 3D objects. The vertical resolution of stereolithography can reach sub micrometers or tens of micrometers, while the planar resolution is determined by the size of laser beam spot. Currently, single layer of resin being painted is 25 μm in thickness with minimum laser beam shifting distance of 10 μm. In addition to laser beam, digital light processing projector and LED can serve as light sources.
The advantages of stereolithography are precise patterns on 2D plane, modest consumption of liquid material, low cost in printing and ability to produce customer grade 3D printing devices. However, limited by printing procedures, only one epoxy or acrylate resin can be applied during one printing operation. And requirement of post-processing may be another disadvantage of stereolithography. Besides, the printing process may be influenced by uncontrollable non-linear factors such as resin polymerization around the vicinity of laser spot and temperature shift induced polymerization. Based on the mechanism of stereolithography, researchers developed multijet or polyjet technique to print multiple photo sensitive inks for UV induced polymerization [153, 154]. Multijet technique has equivalent or even better resolution comparing to conventional stereolithography, and employment of multiple nozzles enables switch of materials during printing. The major defect of this method is expensive hardware cost, which corresponds to 10 or 100 times of the cost of customer grade printing devices. Besides, other derivations based on stereolithography include digital micromirror device-based projection printing (DMD-PP) and two photon polymerization (2PP). Both of these two methods have better printing resolution than stereolithography, but the time required by processing is prolonged.
1.3.3.2 Fused Deposition Method
In fused deposition method, melted thermoplastic material of several millimeters diameter is squeezed out from a tiny nozzle of hundreds micrometers wide and added to the printing structure [155]. Common printing material include polylactic acid,polycarbonate and acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS), and through mixing stainless steel particles, wood chips, ceramic powder, carbon nanotubes and grapheme into thermoplastics, hybrid materials can be obtained. After squeezing, printing material is piled up shoulder by shoulder in the shape of cylinders, therefore resulting in larger roughness than other 3D printing methods. Certainly, fused deposition method has its own unique advantages, including compatibility with various cheap and easily obtained materials, low cost in equipment, alternative printing of several materials by integration of multiple nozzles and cost performance allowing for development of customer grade devices. Similar with fused deposition method, direct ink writing (DIW) uses viscoelastic ink with regulated rheological properties and pneumatic pump controlled injection to directly paint material to substrate [156]. For DIW, the minimum diameter of nozzle lumen can be 1 μm, and normally used materials are ceramics, polymers and metal nano particles.
When assessing the performance of a 3D printing device, major concerned parameters are resolution, printing speed, material compatibility and manufacture size. And there is huge space for further development of current printing devices in these aspects. As for hardware, cost of printing devices is mainly ranging from thousands or tens of thousands dollars and it is necessary to further cut down the cost of equipment. For printing material, the choice is largely limited by the processing procedure, and functional properties of material like biocompatibility and transparency become subordinate factors. In the future, 3D printing technique should provide more options when it comes to material choices and strategies for multiple materials alternative printing (Fig. 1.8d–g) [157, 158]. Finally, the resolution of 3D printing needs to be improved comparing with soft lithography [159]. And it is a large challenge to avoid significant prolonged time period when increasing printing resolution. One feasible manner is to combine high resolution printing and low resolution printing into one device to balance the time cost and requirement of printing resolution [160]. Of course, the incoming problem is largely increased cost of equipment to implement two printing system in one machine.
1.4 Integration of Microfluidics Functional Units
The miniaturized features of microfluidic chip make possible not only the manipulation of micro objects and analysis of micro volume sample, but also the integration of different functional units into one chip. Functional units on chip can realize sample pretreatment, flow control, cell culture and sensing detection, which greatly extend the detection capability of device. Next, we shall have some introduction about the common functional units in microfluidic chips.
1.4.1 Flow Manipulation: Micropump, Microvalve and Mixer
In microfluidic devices, flow control can be divided into two types according to the underlain principles. The first type of control relies on the physical effects that are significant in micro scale such as surface tension and capillary effect, and it is called passive manipulation. The second type depends on external forces like pump to control flow, and is called active manipulation. Common driving forces for flow pump include electricity [161], magnetofluid power [162] and electroosmotic flow [163]. Besides, flow driven by centrifuge force from device rotation is also subject to active manipulation. Pump has been regarded as the pivot for flow system, and when building microfluidic chip based analytical platform in laboratory, external pump is often essential. The advantages of connecting a pump are obvious: precise and steady control of flow and realization of complex programmed pump behaviors. But in development of mobile device, external pump would harm the device portability, and extending conductor pipe would cause dead volume and result in sample waste. There are publications reporting integration of micropump on chip, and according to different driving manners, passive or active pump is called (Fig. 1.9) [164]. Principle of passive micropump is the capillary effect, while the active pump has variety of driving forces, such as electroosmotic, electrochemical, pneumatic peristaltic, acoustic, electrostatic and magnetic power. Electroosmotic driving provides steady flow rate, and through switching the polarity of electrode, flow direction can be easily reversed. Owing to mechanical-motion-free feature of electroosmotic unit, this type of pump can be simply integrated into micro chip [165]. Electrochemical pump relies on the generating bubbles from water electrolysis to drive flow forwards [166], and pneumatic pump depends on the pressure induced deformation of membrane to control the flow in lower channels [167].
Pump provides driving forces for fluid flowing, while valve is in charge of the on-off of flow circuit. Microvalve on chip can also be divided into two types as passive and active valve. Passive valves refer to those independent of mechanical opening and closing, the typical examples of which include cantilever valve, diaphragm valve and diffuser valve. Active valves are oppositely dependent of mechanical forces for the valve switching, and may be based on the principles of piezoelectric ceramics, thermal pneumatic power, electrostatic forces and electromagnetic interaction. Currently, pneumatic membrane microvalve prepared by PDMS is the most widely used integrated valve in microchip [168].
In the field of microfluidics, the tiny scale of channel as well as the laminar makes solution mixing a very slow process basically through free diffusion. And this is an unfavorable fact for mixing, but has been ingeniously applied for the generation of concentration gradients. Methods to enhance flow mixing include producing convection and shortening diffusion distance. For example, protruding geometries were designed inside micro channel to effectively induce turbulent flow and enhance solution mixing, which is easy to realize on microchip [169]. Besides, external forces have also been employed to increase the turbulent component of fluid flow.
1.4.2 Concentration Gradient Generator
Biomolecules regulate the behaviors of cells such as proliferation and differentiation among inside-body environment. There are researches indicating the close relation between the concentration gradient of cellular factors and cancer invasion [170], and this chemotaxis of cancer cells has been employed to develop anti-cancer medicine. Conventional drug concentration screening experiments are conducted on multi-well plate, and as the growing maturity and broader application of microfluidic technique on biological researches, methods of concentration gradients based on microfluidics have been rapidly developed. Advantages of concentration gradients on chip include wider gradient ranges, more precise partition of concentration on space distribution, maintained gradient persistency and compatibility with real time monitoring method of cell behaviors. Generally, the strength of chip based concentration gradients reflects its powerful control of the cell culturing environment. And until now, concentration gradients have played important parts in the researches of wound healing [171], inflammation response [172] and cancer metastasis [173] as well as chemical synthesis of drug. According to its time dependent stability, concentration gradient can be classified as dynamic and static. Major methods for the concentration gradient realization on chip include:
-
(a)
Semi-permeable membrane diffusion based concentration gradient. As mentioned above, fluid mixing through diffusion inside a tiny channel is very slow, which provides chance for concentration gradient creation (Fig. 1.10a) [174]. To preserve diffusion based concentration gradient, the priority is to eliminate the convection flow through methods such as setting up semi-permeable membrane to separate two flows [175]. Another method is to deploy narrow connecting channels between different chambers (Fig. 1.10b) [176]. However, normally the gradient can’t last long.
-
(b)
Convection based concentration gradient generator . Convection is actually also applied to create concentration gradient. Typically, convection requires rather higher flow rate and precise flow control, which may cause harm to cell biology due to the large shear force. On the other hand, running flow is critical for the medicine transportation and removal of metabolic waste. Therefore the flow rate can’t be too small. According to the equation of shear force,
$${{\tau }}\left( {\text{cell}} \right) = 6{\text{Q}} \mu/{\text{h}}^{2} {\text{w}}$$shear force is related to flow volume rate, fluid viscosity and channel dimension (height and width). Increasing the channel height and lowering flow linear velocity can help reduce shear force subject to cell and alleviate cell damage. Another feature of convection based concentration gradient is that the formation of gradient is always perpendicular to flow direction, for example the well-known “Christmas Tree” model (Fig. 1.10C) [15]. Christmas tree shaped gradient generator was proposed by Jeon in 2000 [177], and by regulating flow rates and concentrations of different flows, concentration gradients of special and temporal variety can be created. Convection based gradients can be preserved for a long time, and similar structures include Y-shape channel.
-
(c)
Hydrodynamic focusing device. Through hydrodynamics related method, externally added drugs or cell factors are confined in a predesigned area [178].
-
(d)
Concentration gradients on micro droplets. Droplet technology is a unique product born along with the development of microlfuidics and has been applied in micro-volume reaction, single cell analysis and material synthesis. Regulation of concentration in the dispersion phase can achieve a gradient distribution over different droplets [179]. The combination of droplet technology with concentration gradient method avoids the external interference and provides a stable culturing environment for cells. Besides, the application of droplet technology greatly improves the analysis throughput, which can be further applied in drug screening.
1.4.3 Cell Culture Chamber
Integration of all kinds of functional units on chip makes microfluidic chip a platform for various research purposes rather than a specific analytical device. In biology related researches, the functions of microchip is extended from pure analysis of cell lysis and metabolites to construction of cell in vitro culture model, studying intercellular interaction and single cell analysis. And one critical step involved in the realization of above functions is the cell online culturing. Compared to conventional cell culture methods, advantages of using microfluidics rest with the precise control of microenvironment and targeting smaller cell population even single cell as research subject. Cell culture experiments in petri dish normally ignore the distinctions between different cell individuals, but rather take averaged responses from mass amount of cells as final results. In some situations, research concerning single cell behavior bears larger significance, for example the study of stem cell proliferation and differentiation under certain circumstances [180]. And at this point microfluidic chip has become one ideal candidate from not many available choices for single cell research. Series of derivative technologies concerning cell manipulation have been developed such as 3D hydrogel encapsulated culture and microwell capture array, which we will discuss in the later chapters.
1.4.4 Integrated Biosensors
When establishing microfluidic chip based analytical platform in laboratory, optional external detectors include mass spectrometer, fluorescence monitor and electrochemical detector. However, for analysis of complex biosamples, common detecting methods usually fail to achieve high specificity and sensitivity. And to solve this problem, specific biosensors are required and integrated into microchip to improve analysis efficiency (Fig. 1.11a, b) [26, 181]. On chip biosensors can be categorized as enzyme catalyzed reacting biosensor, immune biosensor, optical detector and DNA detecting array. Integrated biosensors can effectively reduce the consumption of sample and reagents, shorten operation time, lower detection cost and help development of portal devices. We shall have a brief introduction of on chip biosensors in the following content.
1.4.4.1 Enzyme Catalyzed Biosensor
For enzyme biosensor, enzymes with bioactivity are fixed inside channel or to the electrode surface (Fig. 1.11c) [182]. When passing through detection area, the analytes are catalyzed by enzymes, transferred to color changes or electrochemical signals (Fig. 1.11d) [183] and detected. At present, enzyme biosensors are widely applied in the detection of blood glucose, urea and cholesterol, among which glucose assay is the most successful commercialized product. The first glucose biosensor was invented in 1962 [184], and decades since, there had been many optimized versions while with little alternation of the basic principle of electrochemical detection by enzyme modified electrodes. Urea level in blood is also an important indicator of many diseases like renal failure, nephritis, urinary obstruction and gastrointestinal bleeding. For urea detection, urease and glutamic acid dehydrogenase are employed.
1.4.4.2 Immune Sensor
Immune sensor is a detection method based on antigen-antibody recognition and turns the existence of analytes into fluctuation of resistance, electric current, electric capacity and refraction index. Specificity of immune sensor is high with good reproducibility. But the limits are high cost of monoclonal antibodies and tedious detection cycles. Immune sensors are mainly used in on chip detection of pathogen, bacteria, and viruses.
1.4.5 Microfluidic Centrifuge Device
A special type of device with the shape of laser Discs is invented with the development of microfluidics and called microfluidic centrifuge device (Fig. 1.12a–d) [185,186,187,188]. During operation, the high speed rotation of device generates centrifuge force to drive sample flow into treatment chamber , without the need of connecting to external pump. History of centrifuge device can be traced back to 1960s, when ORNL micro analytical device was employed in clinical to transport sample solution by centrifuge driving. But the idea of functional integration and miniaturization hadn’t come to stage back then. After decades’ development, microfluidic centrifuge device has become a very important tool for sample treatment and analysis, especially in the fields of clinical detection, immune diagnosis, protein analysis, cellular sample handling and biomarker detection.
As mentioned above, microfluidic device spares the trouble of connecting to an external pump and allows for set up of enclosed system. Due to the removal of external conductor system and accompanying dead volume, waste of sample is avoided. Centrifuge device is capable of processing sample in the volume of nano liter to milliliter, and the driving of flow in centrifuge device is continuous due to the rotation movement of device. Other unique functionalities reflected by centrifuge device include density based components separation, automatic processing procedures such as sample inflow and eviction under different rotation speeds and miniaturization and integration. Generally, the working procedures of microfluidic centrifuge device are sample addition, reagents storage and release, liquid transportation, valve switch, mixing and detection. Direction of liquid transportation is normally from center of the device to outer margin due to the centrifuge force driving. Therefore, the sample inlet is also placed in the center of the device. Detectors compatible with centrifuge device are mainly optical and electrochemical. Although numerous companies have participated in the development of microfluidic centrifuge devices, few commercialized products have come into the market. The reasons for this weak commercial transformation are in two aspects. In one hand, employment of centrifuge movement saves part of the trouble in developing portal device by removing external pump, but also results in extra requirement for external power supply. Therefore, centrifuge device doesn’t actually improve portability. On the other hand, flow control by centrifuge force is apparently not as precise or stable as flow pump does, and special liquid transporting manner causes the chip design some problems.
1.5 Development and Outlooks
Going through the brief history of microfluidics development, we have witnessed a path of favored diversity. In the choice of chip materials, there were different times when inorganic and polymers taking the dominant positions. In specific formats, there are ready-to-use test papers and analytical platforms with multiple functionalities. Actually when speaking to the future development of microfluidics, it is hard to cover all kinds of devices by a single standard. Each microfluidic device has its own development according to the different functionalities. Next, we will focus on several emerging fields of microfluidics which might have important applications in the future.
1.5.1 Point of Care (POC)
Analytical methods of series of biomarkers have been well established in laboratory, which require extensive work as well as professionally trained personnel. The common procedures include sampling, detection and results analysis. To improve the convenience of biochemical test and shorten detection time, point of care detection methods based on microfluidics technology have been developed. The major detection targets of POC methods are small molecules (blood glucose and urea), cells (CD4 + T-cell counter for AIDS diagnosis) and nucleic acids. The purpose of POC diagnosis is to make preliminary screening test closer to patients and may be used in community medical center, clinics, emergency center or at home.
Although microfluidic methods receive mass attention in academic circles and funding supports from government and private capitals, current examples of commercialization of POC device are still few. The major defects of POC device are the compromised sensitivity and quantification ability in analysis of complex biosamples comparing to laboratory large equipment. The development of POC device largely depends on the discovery of new disease biomarkers , especially those existing in the peripheral body fluids. For certain diseases such as cancer, diabetes, AIDS, tuberculosis and Alzheimer’s disease, positive results have been obtained in biomarkers discovery, but there is a lack of unified standard and theoretical basis for biomarker based disease diagnosis. At present, commercialized POC devices can be classified into two types, and one is the lateral flow test that uses test paper or semi-permeable membrane strip for protein detection. The scale of global market for in vitro diagnosis has exceeded 40 billion dollars and 1 billion among is occupied by test paper business. Normal working procedures for test paper are sample addition, solution flowing through areas with labeling reagents and capture array, and finally formation of a colored line by labeled and captured biomarkers which can be told by raw eye observation. Typical examples are pregnancy test and flu test. In areas suffering from lack of infrastructure, test paper is also used for HIV diagnosis. Lateral flow based test is capable for target analysis at μM or mM level. Lower amount of analytes requires specific amplification strategies for detection, which may increase the complexity of device structure. In the last decade, plenty of funds and manpower have been invested to improve test paper performance, but little payback is obtained.
Another type of POC device is the electronic detecting instruments represented by glucose meter. Commercialization of glucose meter is an unrivaled success, which can be hardly duplicated by other products. There are unique favorable factors for the market expansion of glucose meter. Firstly the content of blood glucose in human body reaches mM level and exceeds the lower detection limit of electrochemical methods. Secondly, frequency of glucose meter usage can be several times a day for patients of diabetes, which provides large demands for the consumptive test papers.
There are problems needing to be solved in the future development of POC device.
First question is how to integrate multi-step sample treatment and analysis into one device and realize full automation of processing from samples to diagnosis results. Procedures of analysis include sample collection, pretreatment, analyte reaction, signal transformation and report. Due to the vast disparities of technologies involved in different steps, it is hard to meet all requirements by one scheme.
Other questions are how to simplify operation of device and make untrained personnel capable of operating, and how to improve test reliability.
1.5.2 Implantable Device
First implantable device was invented in 1958, and since then numerous companies and researchers have dedicated themselves to the development and improvement of this field (Fig. 1.13a–d) [189,190,191,192]. The continuously emerging demand for implantable device is related with the rise of aging population in major developed countries. According to the research from Freedonia group, the market scale of implantable device in America is increased with a rate of 7.7% and reached 52 billion dollars in 2005 [193], and the largest share of market is taken by implantable rectification equipment such as artificial joints and bones. Other types of implantable device include cardiovascular related apparatus (cardiac pacemaker and intravascular stent), nerve stimulator and drug delivery carrier. Though many implantable devices of medical intention are aimed at aging population, more and more newly emerged products are targeting at the body shaping market of young people. Medical implantable device that is totally or partly prepared by micromachining has been well commercialized and applied in treatment to different diseases. For example, acceleration sensor is equipped to cardiac pacemaker and defibrillator to sense body location and movement. Electronic instruments of this type require built-in power source, which occupies large space and may do harm to patient’s health if leakage happened. Recently developed wireless charging system can avoid the problems encountered by built-in power design and extend the validity period of device. But the disadvantage is requirement of external supporting equipment.
Material choice of implantable device is strictly limited by several standards. Firstly, the candidate must be biocompatible which causes no toxic, allergic, inflammatory or immune reaction of the body. Secondly, stable must the material maintain in sterilization treatment such as heating, chemical reagents washing, radiation and high pressure. These treatments can’t harm the normal functionality of device. Finally, the chosen material should possess corresponding electronic or mechanical properties to realize full device functions.
Future development of implantable device rests with the integration of monitoring and treatment in one device to achieve a closed loop from diagnosis to therapy according to the personalized situation of patients. Besides, through online information interchange, doctors at remote terminals can receive the monitoring data and give medical intervention in time.
1.5.3 Smart Mobile Device
Another direction for microfluidic device development is to combine microchip portal detection with the data analysis, management and transportation of smart phone and establish a mobile analytical platform. This concept is also called MS2 (Mobile sensing based on microfluidics and smartphone) [194]. Actually, various built-in sensors as well as external detectors have been used to acquire health data of user with smart phone APP. The combination of microfluidic device with smart phone greatly expands the data acquisition ability of mobile phone (Fig. 1.14a–c) [195,196,197]. At the same time, features of immediate information processing and transportation of smart phone makes detection results no longer restricted to temporal and regional factors and instant feedback available. Common characters shared by two devices such as miniaturized structures, portability and simple operation enable the successful combination and establishment of mobile analytical platform. Smart mobile sensing can realize remote in-field monitoring, help improve family health care and provide medical aids to resource limited areas. Its application has involved fields of food quality monitor, regular health examination and disease diagnosis.
As a pioneer of this discipline, Martinez and coworkers from Harvard firstly connected paper based microchip to a smart phone and applied the device to glucose and protein detection in artificial urine sample at 2008 [198]. Then in 2009, Lu and colleagues designed an immune test device assembled by PDMS chip and smart phone [199]. The combination of microfluidics with mobile phone not only provides a simple solution for portable detection, but also makes remote medical diagnosis a reality.
However, the biggest limit of applying mobile sensing device to regular physical examination now is that mobile device doesn’t reflect an irreplaceable detecting feature, and medical workers prefer to use conventional methods. Moreover, the sampling of MS2 equipment requires additional pipette or flow pump, which largely affects the portability and easy operation. In the future, the human-device interface needs further optimization by integrating sample inlet directly on device, such as installing blood taking needle or swab. Certain protection must be installed to prevent sample contamination in a complicated working environment. And owing to poor telecommunication and infrastructures in some regions, detection results must be stored in device for a certain period. This limitation can be overcome by increasing battery capacity and endurance.
Only after mass production and wide acceptance by consumers, can a value of technology be reflected. Smart mobile sensing is an emerging territory of microfluidics and we will wait and see what a role it can play in future.
References
Terry SC, Jerman JH, Angell JB (1979) Gas-chromatographic air analyzer fabricated on a silicon-wafer. IEEE T Electron Dev 26(12):1880–1886. doi:10.1109/T-Ed.1979.19791
Manz A, Miyahara Y, Miura J, Watanabe Y, Miyagi H, Sato K (1990) Design of an open-tubular column liquid chromatograph using silicon chip technology. Sensor Actuat B-Chem 1(1–6):249–255. doi:10.1016/0925-4005(90)80210-Q
Manz A, Graber N, Widmer HM (1990) Miniaturized total chemical-analysis systems—a novel concept for chemical sensing. Sensor Actuat B-Chem 1(1–6):244–248. doi:10.1016/0925-4005(90)80209-I
Iliescu C, Taylor H, Avram M, Miao JM, Franssila S (2012) A practical guide for the fabrication of microfluidic devices using glass and silicon. Biomicrofluidics 6(1):016505. doi:10.1063/1.3689939
Nge PN, Rogers CI, Woolley AT (2013) Advances in microfluidic materials, functions, integration, and applications. Chem Rev 113(4):2550–2583. doi:10.1021/cr300337x
Beebe DJ, Mensing GA, Walker GM (2002) Physics and applications of microfluidics in biology. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 4:261–286. doi:10.1146/annurev.bioeng.4.112601.125916
Sackmann EK, Fulton AL, Beebe DJ (2014) The present and future role of microfluidics in biomedical research. Nature 507(7491):181–189. doi:10.1038/nature13118
Wu J, He ZY, Chen QS, Lin JM (2016) Biochemical analysis on microfluidic chips. Trac-Trend Anal Chem 80:213–231. doi:10.1016/j.trac.2016.03.013
Wu J, Chen Q, Lin JM (2017) Microfluidic technologies in cell isolation and analysis for biomedical applications. Analyst 142(3):421–441. doi:10.1039/c6an01939k
Squires TM, Quake SR (2005) Microfluidics: Fluid physics at the nanoliter scale. Rev Mod Phys 77(3):977–1026. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.77.977
Janasek D, Franzke J, Manz A (2006) Scaling and the design of miniaturized chemical-analysis systems. Nature 442(7101):374–380. doi:10.1038/nature05059
Martel JM, Toner M (2012) Inertial focusing dynamics in spiral microchannels. Phys Fluids 24(3):032001. doi:10.1063/1.3681228
Sudarsan AP, Ugaz VM (2006) Multivortex micromixing. P Natl Acad Sci USA 103(19):7228–7233. doi:10.1073/pnas.0507976103
Mao SF, Zhang J, Li HF, Lin JM (2013) Strategy for signaling molecule detection by using an integrated microfluidic device coupled with mass spectrometry to study cell-to-cell communication. Anal Chem 85(2):868–876. doi:10.1021/ac303164b
Liu W, Lin JM (2016) Online monitoring of lactate efflux by multi-channel microfluidic chip-mass spectrometry for rapid drug evaluation. Acs Sensors 1(4):344–347. doi:10.1021/acssensors.5b00221
Liu W, Chen QS, Lin XX, Lin JM (2015) Online multi-channel microfluidic chip-mass spectrometry and its application for quantifying noncovalent protein-protein interactions. Analyst 140(5):1551–1554. doi:10.1039/c4an02370f
Wang NJ, Mao SF, Liu W, Wu J, Li HF, Lin JM (2014) Online monodisperse droplets based liquid-liquid extraction on a continuously flowing system by using microfluidic devices. Rsc Adv 4(23):11919–11926. doi:10.1039/c4ra00984c
Zhang J, Chen FM, He ZY, Ma Y, Uchiyama K, Lin JM (2016) A novel approach for precisely controlled multiple cell patterning in microfluidic chips by inkjet printing and the detection of drug metabolism and diffusion. Analyst 141(10):2940–2947. doi:10.1039/c6an00395h
Chen QS, Utech S, Chen D, Prodanovic R, Lin JM, Weitz DA (2016) Controlled assembly of heterotypic cells in a core-shell scaffold: organ in a droplet. Lab Chip 16(8):1346–1349. doi:10.1039/c6lc00231e
Lin XX, Leung KH, Lin L, Lin LY, Lin S, Leung CH, Ma DL, Lin JM (2016) Determination of cell metabolite VEGF(165) and dynamic analysis of protein-DNA interactions by combination of microfluidic technique and luminescent switch-on probe. Biosens Bioelectron 79:41–47. doi:10.1016/j.bios.2015.11.089
Fantuzzi A, Capria E, Mak LH, Dodhia VR, Sadeghi SJ, Collins S, Somers G, Hug E, Gilardi G (2010) An electrochemical microfluidic platform for human P450 drug metabolism profiling. Anal Chem 82(24):10222–10227. doi:10.1021/ac102480k
Zimmerman WB (2011) Electrochemical microfluidics. Chem Eng Sci 66(7):1412–1425. doi:10.1016/j.ces.2010.03.057
Wu J, Jie MS, Dong XL, Qi HB, Lin JM (2016) Multi-channel cell co-culture for drug development based on glass microfluidic chip-mass spectrometry coupled platform. Rapid Commun Mass Sp 30:80–86. doi:10.1002/rcm.7643
Jie MS, Li HF, Lin LY, Zhang J, Lin JM (2016) Integrated microfluidic system for cell co-culture and simulation of drug metabolism. Rsc Adv 6(59):54564–54572. doi:10.1039/c6ra10407j
Lin XX, Chen QS, Liu W, Zhang J, Wang SQ, Lin ZX, Lin JM (2015) Oxygen-induced cell migration and on-line monitoring biomarkers modulation of cervical cancers on a microfluidic system. Sci Rep 5:0001. doi:10.1038/Srep09643
Lin XX, Chen QS, Liu W, Li HF, Lin JM (2014) A portable microchip for ultrasensitive and high-throughput assay of thrombin by rolling circle amplification and hemin/G-quadruplex system. Biosens Bioelectron 56:71–76. doi:10.1016/j.bios.2013.12.061
Lefevre F, Chalifour A, Yu L, Chodavarapu V, Juneau P, Izquierdo R (2012) Algal fluorescence sensor integrated into a microfluidic chip for water pollutant detection. Lab Chip 12(4):787–793. doi:10.1039/c2lc20998e
Lafleur JP, Senkbeil S, Jensen TG, Kutter JP (2012) Gold nanoparticle-based optical microfluidic sensors for analysis of environmental pollutants. Lab Chip 12(22):4651–4656. doi:10.1039/c2lc40543a
Yoon JY, Kim B (2012) Lab-on-a-chip pathogen sensors for food safety. Sensors-Basel 12(8):10713–10741. doi:10.3390/s120810713
Atalay YT, Vermeir S, Witters D, Vergauwe N, Verbruggen B, Verboven P, Nicolai BM, Lammertyn J (2011) Microfluidic analytical systems for food analysis. Trends Food Sci Tech 22(7):386–404. doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2011.05.001
Govindarajan AV, Ramachandran S, Vigil GD, Yager P, Bohringer KF (2012) A low cost point-of-care viscous sample preparation device for molecular diagnosis in the developing world; an example of microfluidic origami. Lab Chip 12(1):174–181. doi:10.1039/c1lc20622b
Kim MS, Kim T, Kong SY, Kwon S, Bae CY, Choi J, Kim CH, Lee ES, Park JK (2010) Breast cancer diagnosis using a microfluidic multiplexed immunohistochemistry platform. PLoS ONE 5(5):e10441. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0010441
Ziółkowska K, Kwapiszewski R, Brzózka Z (2011) Microfluidic devices as tools for mimicking the in vivo environment. New J Chem 35(5):979–990. doi:10.1039/c0nj00709a
Sung JH, Shuler ML (2012) Microtechnology for mimicking in vivo tissue environment. Ann Biomed Eng 40(6):1289–1300. doi:10.1007/s10439-011-0491-2
Huh D, Matthews BD, Mammoto A, Montoya-Zavala M, Hsin HY, Ingber DE (2010) Reconstituting organ-level lung functions on a chip. Science 328(5986):1662–1668. doi:10.1126/science.1188302
Webb DP, Knauf B, Liu CQ, Hutt D, Conway P (2009) Productionisation issues for commercialisation of microfluidic based devices. Sensor Rev 29(4):349–354. doi:10.1108/02602280910986601
Blow N (2007) Microfluidics: in search of a killer application. Nat Methods 4(8):665–668. doi:10.1038/nmeth0807-665
Volpatti LR, Yetisen AK (2014) Commercialization of microfluidic devices. Trends Biotechnol 32(7):347–350. doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2014.04.010
Jang JS, Simon VA, Feddersen RM, Rakhshan F, Schultz DA, Zschunke MA, Lingle WL, Kolbert CP, Jen J (2011) Quantitative miRNA expression analysis using fluidigm microfluidics dynamic arrays. BMC Genom 12:144. doi:10.1186/1471-2164-12-144
Moonsamy PV, Williams T, Bonella P, Holcomb CL, Hoglund BN, Hillman G, Goodridge D, Turenchalk GS, Blake LA, Daigle DA, Simen BB, Hamilton A, May AP, Erlich HA (2013) High throughput HLA genotyping using 454 sequencing and the Fluidigm Access Array (TM) system for simplified amplicon library preparation. Tissue Antigens 81(3):141–149. doi:10.1111/tan.12071
Ren KN, Zhou JH, Wu HK (2013) Materials for microfluidic chip fabrication. Accounts Chem Res 46(11):2396–2406. doi:10.1021/ar300314s
Fleger M, Neyer A (2006) PDMS microfluidic chip with integrated waveguides for optical detection. Microelectron Eng 83(4–9):1291–1293. doi:10.1016/j.mee.2006.01.086
Liao Y, Song JX, Li E, Luo Y, Shen YL, Chen DP, Cheng Y, Xu ZZ, Sugioka K, Midorikawa K (2012) Rapid prototyping of three-dimensional microfluidic mixers in glass by femtosecond laser direct writing. Lab Chip 12(4):746–749. doi:10.1039/c2lc21015k
Lopez-Ruiz N, Curto VF, Erenas MM, Benito-Lopez F, Diamond D, Palma AJ, Capitan-Vallvey LF (2014) Smartphone-based simultaneous pH and nitrite colorimetric determination for paper microfluidic devices. Anal Chem 86(19):9554–9562. doi:10.1021/ac5019205
Abgrall P, Gue AM (2007) Lab-on-chip technologies: making a microfluidic network and coupling it into a complete microsystem—a review. J Micromech Microeng 17(5):R15–R49. doi:10.1088/0960-1317/17/5/R01
Fu JP, Mao P, Han J (2008) Artificial molecular sieves and filters: a new paradigm for biomolecule separation. Trends Biotechnol 26(6):311–320. doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2008.02.009
Reidy S, Lambertus G, Reece J, Sacks R (2006) High-performance, static-coated silicon microfabricated columns for gas chromatography. Anal Chem 78(8):2623–2630. doi:10.1021/ac051846u
Pipper J, Inoue M, Ng LFP, Neuzil P, Zhang Y, Novak L (2007) Catching bird flu in a droplet. Nat Med 13(10):1259–1263. doi:10.1038/nm1634
Wang ZH, Jin G (2004) Silicon surface modification with a mixed silanes layer to immobilize proteins for biosensor with imaging ellipsometry. Colloid Surface B 34(3):173–177. doi:10.1016/j.colurfb.2003.12.012
Northrup MA, Benett B, Hadley D, Landre P, Lehew S, Richards J, Stratton P (1998) A miniature analytical instrument for nucleic acids based on micromachined silicon reaction chambers. Anal Chem 70(5):918–922. doi:10.1021/Ac970486a
Wilding P, Shoffner MA, Kricka LJ (1994) Pcr in a silicon microstructure. Clin Chem 40(9):1815–1818
Torisawa Y, Shiku H, Yasukawa T, Nishizawa M, Matsue T (2005) Multi-channel 3-D cell culture device integrated on a silicon chip for anticancer drug sensitivity test. Biomaterials 26(14):2165–2172. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.05.028
Torisawa YS, Kaya T, Takii Y, Oyamatsu D, Nishizawa M, Matsue T (2003) Scanning electrochemical microscopy-based drug sensitivity test for a cell culture integrated in silicon microstructures. Anal Chem 75(9):2154–2158. doi:10.1021/ac026317u
Park TH, Shuler ML (2003) Integration of cell culture and microfabrication technology. Biotechnol Progr 19(2):243–253. doi:10.1021/bp020143k
Sainiemi L, Nissila T, Kostiainen R, Ketola RA, Franssila S (2011) A microfabricated silicon platform with 60 microfluidic chips for rapid mass spectrometric analysis. Lab Chip 11(17):3011–3014. doi:10.1039/c1lc20275h
Kralj JG, Sahoo HR, Jensen KF (2007) Integrated continuous microfluidic liquid-liquid extraction. Lab Chip 7(2):256–263. doi:10.1039/b610888a
Harrison DJ, Fluri K, Seiler K, Fan ZH, Effenhauser CS, Manz A (1993) Micromachining a miniaturized capillary electrophoresis-based chemical-analysis system on a chip. Science 261(5123):895–897. doi:10.1126/science.261.5123.895
Easley CJ, Humphrey JAC, Landers JP (2007) Thermal isolation of microchip reaction chambers for rapid non-contact DNA amplification. J Micromech Microeng 17(9):1758–1766. doi:10.1088/0960-1317/17/9/002
Lewis AC, Hamilton JF, Rhodes CN, Halliday J, Bartle KD, Homewood P, Grenfell RJP, Goody B, Harling AM, Brewer P, Vargha G, Milton MJT (2010) Microfabricated planar glass gas chromatography with photoionization detection. J Chromatogr 1217(5):768–774. doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2009.12.009
Lin CH, Lee GB, Lin YH, Chang GL (2001) A fast prototyping process for fabrication of microfluidic systems on soda-lime glass. J Micromech Microeng 11(6):726–732. doi:10.1088/0960-1317/11/6/316
French PJ, Sarro PM (1998) Surface versus bulk micromachining: the contest for suitable applications. J Micromech Microeng 8(2):45–53. doi:10.1088/0960-1317/8/2/002
James CD, Okandan M, Mani SS, Galambos PC, Shul R (2006) Monolithic surface micromachined fluidic devices for dielectrophoretic preconcentration and routing of particles. J Micromech Microeng 16(10):1909–1918. doi:10.1088/0960-1317/16/10/001
Abgrall P, Nguyen NT (2008) Nanofluidic devices and their applications. Anal Chem 80(7):2326–2341. doi:10.1021/ac702296u
Sniegowski JJ, de Boer MP (2000) IC-compatible polysilicon surface micromachining. Annu Rev Mater Sci 30:299–333. doi:10.1146/annurev.matsci.30.1.299
de Boer MJ, Tjerkstra RW, Berenschot JW, Jansen HV, Burger CJ, Gardeniers JGE, Elwenspoek M, van den Berg A (2000) Micromachining of buried micro channels in silicon. J Microelectromech S 9(1):94–103. doi:10.1109/84.825783
Paik SJ, Byun A, Lim JM, Park Y, Lee A, Chung S, Chang JK, Chun K, Cho DD (2004) In-plane single-crystal-silicon microneedles for minimally invasive microfluid systems. Sensor Actuat a-Phys 114(2–3):276–284. doi:10.1016/j.sna.2003.12.029
Dijkstra M, de Boer MJ, Berenschot JW, Lammerink TS, Wiegerink RJ, Elwenspoek M (2007) A versatile surface channel concept for microfluidic applications. J Micromech Microeng 17(10):1971. doi:10.1088/0960-1317/17/10/007
Kovacs GT, Maluf NI, Petersen KE (1998) Bulk micromachining of silicon. P IEEE 86(8):1536–1551. doi:10.1109/5.704259
Lee S, Park S, Cho D (1999) The surface/bulk micromachining (SBM) process: A new method for fabricating released MEMS in single crystal silicon. J Microelectromech S 8(4):409–416. doi:10.1109/84.809055
Zhang YL, Chen QD, Xia H, Sun HB (2010) Designable 3D nanofabrication by femtosecond laser direct writing. Nano Today 5(5):435–448. doi:10.1016/j.nantod.2010.08.007
Cheng JY, Yen MH, Wei CW, Chuang YC, Young TH (2005) Crack-free direct-writing on glass using a low-power UV laser in the manufacture of a microfluidic chip. J Micromech Microeng 15(6):1147–1156. doi:10.1088/0960-1317/15/6/005
Hanada Y, Sugioka K, Kawano H, Ishikawa IS, Miyawaki A, Midorikawa K (2008) Nano-aquarium for dynamic observation of living cells fabricated by femtosecond laser direct writing of photostructurable glass. Biomed Microdevices 10(3):403–410. doi:10.1007/s10544-007-9149-0
Kock M, Kirchner V, Schuster R (2003) Electrochemical micromachining with ultrashort voltage pulses-a versatile method with lithographical precision. Electrochim Acta 48(20–22):3213–3219. doi:10.1016/S0013-4686(03)00374-8
Zhu D, Qu NS, Li HS, Zeng YB, Li DL, Qian SQ (2009) Electrochemical micromachining of microstructures of micro hole and dimple array. Cirp Ann-Manuf Techn 58(1):177–180. doi:10.1016/j.cirp.2009.03.004
Li Y, Zheng YF, Yang G, Peng LQ (2003) Localized electrochemical micromachining with gap control. Sensor Actuat a-Phys 108(1–3):144–148. doi:10.1016/S0924-4247(03)00371-6
Bassu M, Surdo S, Strambini LM, Barillaro G (2012) Electrochemical micromachining as an enabling technology for advanced silicon microstructuring. Adv Funct Mater 22(6):1222–1228. doi:10.1002/adfm.201102124
Iliescu C, Chen BT, Miao J (2008) On the wet etching of Pyrex glass. Sensor Actuat a-Phys 143(1):154–161. doi:10.1016/j.sna.2007.11.022
Reyntjens S, Puers R (2001) A review of focused ion beam applications in microsystem technology. J Micromech Microeng 11(4):287–300. doi:10.1088/0960-1317/11/4/301
Tseng AA (2004) Recent developments in micromilling using focused ion beam technology. J Micromech Microeng 14(4):R15–R34. doi:10.1088/0960-1317/14/4/Ro1
Golonka LJ, Zawada T, Radojewski J, Roguszczak H, Stefanow M (2006) LTCC microfluidic system. Int J Appl Ceram Tec 3(2):150–156. doi:10.1111/j.1744-7402.2006.02072.x
Vasudev A, Kaushik A, Jones K, Bhansali S (2013) Prospects of low temperature co-fired ceramic (LTCC) based microfluidic systems for point-of-care biosensing and environmental sensing. Microfluid Nanofluid 14(3–4):683–702. doi:10.1007/s10404-012-1087-3
Sollier E, Murray C, Maoddi P, Di Carlo D (2011) Rapid prototyping polymers for microfluidic devices and high pressure injections. Lab Chip 11(22):3752–3765. doi:10.1039/c1lc20514e
Becker H, Gartner C (2008) Polymer microfabrication technologies for microfluidic systems. Anal Bioanal Chem 390(1):89–111. doi:10.1007/s00216-007-1692-2
McDonald JC, Whitesides GM (2002) Poly(dimethylsiloxane) as a material for fabricating microfluidic devices. Accounts Chem Res 35(7):491–499. doi:10.1021/ar010110q
Stroock AD, Whitesides GM (2003) Controlling flows in microchannels with patterned surface charge and topography. Accounts Chem Res 36(8):597–604. doi:10.1021/ar0202870
Cha KJ, Kim DS (2011) A portable pressure pump for microfluidic lab-on-a-chip systems using a porous polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) sponge. Biomed Microdevices 13(5):877–883. doi:10.1007/s10544-011-9557-z
Eddings MA, Gale BK (2006) A PDMS-based gas permeation pump for on-chip fluid handling in microfluidic devices. J Micromech Microeng 16(11):2396–2402. doi:10.1088/0960-1317/16/11/021
Zhang WH, Lin SC, Wang CM, Hu J, Li C, Zhuang ZX, Zhou YL, Mathies RA, Yang CYJ (2009) PMMA/PDMS valves and pumps for disposable microfluidics. Lab Chip 9(21):3088–3094. doi:10.1039/b907254c
Lee SW, Kim DJ, Ahn Y, Chai YG (2006) Simple structured polydimethylsiloxane microvalve actuated by external air pressure. P I Mech Eng C-J Mec 220(8):1283–1288. doi:10.1243/09544062JMES177
Aumiller GD, Chandross EA, Tomlinson WJ, Weber HP (1974) Submicrometer resolution replication of relief patterns for integrated optics. J Appl Phys 45(10):4557–4562
Masuda S, Washizu M, Nanba T (1989) Novel method of cell-fusion in field constriction area in fluid integrated-circuit. IEEE T Ind Appl 25(4):732–737. doi:10.1109/28.31255
Duffy DC, McDonald JC, Schueller OJA, Whitesides GM (1998) Rapid prototyping of microfluidic systems in poly(dimethylsiloxane). Anal Chem 70(23):4974–4984. doi:10.1021/Ac980656z
Zhao XM, Xia YN, Whitesides GM (1997) Soft lithographic methods for nano-fabrication. J Mater Chem 7(7):1069–1074. doi:10.1039/A700145b
Qin D, Xia YN, Whitesides GM (2010) Soft lithography for micro- and nanoscale patterning. Nat Protoc 5(3):491–502. doi:10.1038/nprot.2009.234
Merkel TC, Bondar VI, Nagai K, Freeman BD, Pinnau I (2000) Gas sorption, diffusion, and permeation in poly(dimethylsiloxane). J Polym Sci Pol Phys 38(3):415–434. doi:10.1002/(Sici)1099-0488(20000201)38:3<415:Aid-Polb8>3.0.Co;2-Z
Fuard D, Tzvetkova-Chevolleau T, Decossas S, Tracqui P, Schiavone P (2008) Optimization of poly-di-methyl-siloxane (PDMS) substrates for studying cellular adhesion and motility. Microelectron Eng 85(5–6):1289–1293. doi:10.1016/j.mee.2008.02.004
Clausell-Tormos J, Lieber D, Baret JC, El-Harrak A, Miller OJ, Frenz L, Blouwolff J, Humphry KJ, Koster S, Duan H, Holtze C, Weitz DA, Griffiths AD (2008) Merten CA (2008) Droplet-based microfluidic platforms for the encapsulation and screening of mammalian cells and multicellular organisms (vol 15, pg 427. Chem Biol 15(8):875. doi:10.1016/j.chembiol.2008.08.004
Leclerc E, Sakai Y, Fujii T (2003) Cell culture in 3-dimensional microfluidic structure of PDMS (polydimethylsiloxane). Biomed Microdevices 5(2):109–114. doi:10.1023/A:1024583026925
Di Carlo D, Wu LY, Lee LP (2006) Dynamic single cell culture array. Lab Chip 6(11):1445–1449. doi:10.1039/b605937f
Fan R, Vermesh O, Srivastava A, Yen BKH, Qin LD, Ahmad H, Kwong GA, Liu CC, Gould J, Hood L, Heath JR (2008) Integrated barcode chips for rapid, multiplexed analysis of proteins in microliter quantities of blood. Nat Biotechnol 26(12):1373–1378. doi:10.1038/nbt.1507
Wang DJ, Bodovitz S (2010) Single cell analysis: the new frontier in ‘omics’. Trends Biotechnol 28(6):281–290. doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2010.03.002
Liu V, Song YA, Han JY (2010) Capillary-valve-based fabrication of ion-selective membrane junction for electrokinetic sample preconcentration in PDMS chip. Lab Chip 10(11):1485–1490. doi:10.1039/b923214a
Zhou JW, Ellis AV, Voelcker NH (2010) Recent developments in PDMS surface modification for microfluidic devices. Electrophoresis 31(1):2–16. doi:10.1002/elps.200900475
Begolo S, Colas G, Viovy JL, Malaquin L (2011) New family of fluorinated polymer chips for droplet and organic solvent microfluidics. Lab Chip 11(3):508–512. doi:10.1039/c0lc00356e
Lin LY, Jie MS, Chen FM, Zhang J, He ZY, Lin JM (2016) Efficient cell capture in an agarose-PDMS hybrid chip for shaped 2D culture under temozolomide stimulation. Rsc Adv 6(79):75215–75222. doi:10.1039/c6ra15734c
Eng G, Lee BW, Parsa H, Chin CD, Schneider J, Linkov G, Sia SK, Vunjak-Novakovic G (2013) Assembly of complex cell microenvironments using geometrically docked hydrogel shapes. P Natl Acad Sci USA 110(12):4551–4556. doi:10.1073/pnas.1300569110
Sticker D, Rothbauer M, Lechner S, Hehenberger MT, Ertl P (2015) Multi-layered, membrane-integrated microfluidics based on replica molding of a thiol-ene epoxy thermoset for organ-on-a-chip applications. Lab Chip 15(24):4542–4554. doi:10.1039/c5lc01028d
Fiorini GS, Lorenz RM, Kuo JS, Chiu DT (2004) Rapid prototyping of thermoset polyester microfluidic devices. Anal Chem 76(16):4697–4704. doi:10.1021/ac0498922
Ren KN, Dai W, Zhou JH, Su J, Wu HK (2011) Whole-Teflon microfluidic chips. P Natl Acad Sci USA 108(20):8162–8166. doi:10.1073/pnas.1100356108
Grover WH, von Muhlen MG, Manalis SR (2008) Teflon films for chemically-inert microfluidic valves and pumps. Lab Chip 8(6):913–918. doi:10.1039/b800600h
Xia YN, Whitesides GM (1998) Soft lithography. Angew Chem Int Edit 37(5):550–575. doi:10.1002/(Sici)1521-3773(19980316)37:5<550:Aid-Anie550>3.0.Co;2-G
Alves P, Coelho JFJ, Haack J, Rota A, Bruinink A, Gil MH (2009) Surface modification and characterization of thermoplastic polyurethane. Eur Polym J 45(5):1412–1419. doi:10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2009.02.011
Ahmed EM (2015) Hydrogel: preparation, characterization, and applications: a review. J Adv Res 6(2):105–121. doi:10.1016/j.jare.2013.07.006
Tibbitt MW, Anseth KS (2009) Hydrogels as extracellular matrix mimics for 3D cell culture. Biotechnol Bioeng 103(4):655–663. doi:10.1002/bit.22361
Breslin S, O’Driscoll L (2013) Three-dimensional cell culture: the missing link in drug discovery. Drug Discov Today 18(5–6):240–249. doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2012.10.003
Jayawarna V, Ali M, Jowitt TA, Miller AE, Saiani A, Gough JE, Ulijn RV (2006) Nanostructured hydrogels for three-dimensional cell culture through self-assembly of fluorenylmethoxycarbonyl-dipeptides. Adv Mater 18(5):611–614. doi:10.1002/adma.200501522
Huh D, Hamilton GA, Ingber DE (2011) From 3D cell culture to organs-on-chips. Trends Cell Biol 21(12):745–754. doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2011.09.005
Zhang Y, Zhou CB, Nie JF, Le SW, Qin Q, Liu F, Li YP, Li JP (2014) Equipment-free quantitative measurement for microfluidic paper-based analytical devices fabricated using the principles of movable-type printing. Anal Chem 86(4):2005–2012. doi:10.1021/ac403026c
Hossain SMZ, Brennan JD (2011) beta-galactosidase-based colorimetric paper sensor for determination of heavy metals. Anal Chem 83(22):8772–8778. doi:10.1021/ac202290d
Fenton EM, Mascarenas MR, Lopez GP, Sibbett SS (2009) Multiplex lateral-flow test strips fabricated by two-dimensional shaping. Acs Appl Mater Inter 1(1):124–129. doi:10.1021/am800043z
Li X, Tian JF, Garnier G, Shen W (2010) Fabrication of paper-based microfluidic sensors by printing. Colloid Surface B 76(2):564–570. doi:10.1016/j.colsurfb.2009.12.023
Dungchai W, Chailapakul O, Henry CS (2011) A low-cost, simple, and rapid fabrication method for paper-based microfluidics using wax screen-printing. Analyst 136(1):77–82. doi:10.1039/c0an00406e
Olkkonen J, Lehtinen K, Erho T (2010) Flexographically printed fluidic structures in paper. Anal Chem 82(24):10246–10250. doi:10.1021/ac1027066
Martinez AW, Phillips ST, Butte MJ, Whitesides GM (2007) Patterned paper as a platform for inexpensive, low-volume, portable bioassays. Angew Chem Int Edit 46(8):1318–1320. doi:10.1002/anie.200603817
Muller RH, Clegg DL (1949) Automatic paper chromatography. Anal Chem 21(9):1123–1125. doi:10.1021/Ac60033a032
Martinez AW, Phillips ST, Whitesides GM, Carrilho E (2010) Diagnostics for the developing world: microfluidic paper-based analytical devices. Anal Chem 82(1):3–10. doi:10.1021/ac9013989
Martinez AW, Phillips ST, Whitesides GM (2008) Three-dimensional microfluidic devices fabricated in layered paper and tape. P Natl Acad Sci USA 105(50):19606–19611. doi:10.1073/pnas.0810903105
Jokerst JC, Emory JM, Henry CS (2012) Advances in microfluidics for environmental analysis. Analyst 137(1):24–34. doi:10.1039/c1an15368d
Zhang YL, Zuo P, Ye BC (2015) A low-cost and simple paper-based microfluidic device for simultaneous multiplex determination of different types of chemical contaminants in food. Biosens Bioelectron 68:14–19. doi:10.1016/j.bios.2014.12.042
Liu H, Crooks RM (2011) Three-dimensional paper microfluidic devices assembled using the principles of origami. J Am Chem Soc 133(44):17564–17566. doi:10.1021/ja2071779
Klasner SA, Price AK, Hoeman KW, Wilson RS, Bell KJ, Culbertson CT (2010) Paper-based microfluidic devices for analysis of clinically relevant analytes present in urine and saliva. Anal Bioanal Chem 397(5):1821–1829. doi:10.1007/s00216-010-3718-4
Delaney JL, Hogan CF, Tian JF, Shen W (2011) Electrogenerated chemiluminescence detection in paper-based microfluidic sensors. Anal Chem 83(4):1300–1306. doi:10.1021/ac102392t
Li X, Tian JF, Nguyen T, Shen W (2008) Paper-based microfluidic devices by plasma treatment. Anal Chem 80(23):9131–9134. doi:10.1021/ac801729t
Carrilho E, Martinez AW, Whitesides GM (2009) Understanding wax printing: asimple micropatterning process for paper-based microfluidics. Anal Chem 81(16):7091–7095. doi:10.1021/ac901071p
Maattanen A, Fors D, Wang S, Valtakari D, Ihalainen P, Peltonen J (2011) Paper-based planar reaction arrays for printed diagnostics. Sensor Actuat B-Chem 160(1):1404–1412. doi:10.1016/j.snb.2011.09.086
Siegel AC, Phillips ST, Dickey MD, Lu NS, Suo ZG, Whitesides GM (2010) Foldable printed circuit boards on paper substrates. Adv Funct Mater 20(1):28–35. doi:10.1002/adfm.200901363
Chitnis G, Ding ZW, Chang CL, Savran CA, Ziaie B (2011) Laser-treated hydrophobic paper: an inexpensive microfluidic platform. Lab Chip 11(6):1161–1165. doi:10.1039/c0lc00512f
Dungchai W, Chailapakul O, Henry CS (2010) Use of multiple colorimetric indicators for paper-based microfluidic devices. Anal Chim Acta 674(2):227–233. doi:10.1016/j.aca.2010.06.019
Cassano CL, Fan ZH (2013) Laminated paper-based analytical devices (LPAD): fabrication, characterization, and assays. Microfluid Nanofluid 15(2):173–181. doi:10.1007/s10404-013-1140-x
Nie ZH, Nijhuis CA, Gong JL, Chen X, Kumachev A, Martinez AW, Narovlyansky M, Whitesides GM (2010) Electrochemical sensing in paper-based microfluidic devices. Lab Chip 10(4):477–483. doi:10.1039/b917150a
Zang DJ, Ge L, Yan M, Song XR, Yu JH (2012) Electrochemical immunoassay on a 3D microfluidic paper-based device. Chem Commun 48(39):4683–4685. doi:10.1039/c2cc16958d
Chen QS, He ZY, Liu W, Lin XX, Wu J, Li HF, Lin JM (2015) Engineering cell-compatible paper chips for cell culturing, drug screening, and mass spectrometric sensing. Adv Healthc Mater 4(15):2291–2296. doi:10.1002/adhm.201500383
Mu X, Liang QL, Hu P, Ren KN, Wang YM, Luo GA (2009) Laminar flow used as “liquid etch mask” in wet chemical etching to generate glass microstructures with an improved aspect ratio. Lab Chip 9(14):1994–1996. doi:10.1039/b904769g
Blazej RG, Kumaresan P, Mathies RA (2006) Microfabricated bioprocessor for integrated nanoliter-scale Sanger DNA sequencing. P Natl Acad Sci USA 103(19):7240–7245. doi:10.1073/pnas.0602476103
Zhou JH, Ren KN, Zheng YZ, Su J, Zhao YH, Ryan D, Wu HK (2010) Fabrication of a microfluidic Ag/AgCl reference electrode and its application for portable and disposable electrochemical microchips. Electrophoresis 31(18):3083–3089. doi:10.1002/elps.201000113
Xu J, Wu D, Ip JY, Midorikawa K, Sugioka K (2015) Vertical sidewall electrodes monolithically integrated into 3D glass microfluidic chips using water-assisted femtosecond-laser fabrication for in situ control of electrotaxis. Rsc Adv 5(31):24072–24080. doi:10.1039/c5ra00256g
Kato M, Inaba M, Tsukahara T, Mawatari K, Hibara A, Kitamori T (2010) Femto liquid chromatography with attoliter sample separation in the extended nanospace channel. Anal Chem 82(2):543–547. doi:10.1021/ac9017605
Liao Y, Cheng Y, Liu CN, Song JX, He F, Shen YL, Chen DP, Xu ZZ, Fan ZC, Wei XB, Sugioka K, Midorikawa K (2013) Direct laser writing of sub-50 nm nanofluidic channels buried in glass for three-dimensional micro-nanofluidic integration. Lab Chip 13(8):1626–1631. doi:10.1039/c3lc41171k
Ho CMB, Ng SH, Li KHH, Yoon YJ (2015) 3D printed microfluidics for biological applications. Lab Chip 15(18):3627–3637. doi:10.1039/c5lc00685f
Bishop GW, Satterwhite-Warden JE, Kadimisetty K, Rusling JF (2016) 3D-printed bioanalytical devices. Nanotechnology 27(28):0001. doi:10.1088/0957-4484/27/28/284002
Mironov V, Boland T, Trusk T, Forgacs G, Markwald RR (2003) Organ printing: computer-aided jet-based 3D tissue engineering. Trends Biotechnol 21(4):157–161. doi:10.1016/S0167-7799(03)00033-7
Ambrosi A, Pumera M (2016) 3D-printing technologies for electrochemical applications. Chem Soc Rev 45(10):2740–2755. doi:10.1039/c5cs00714c
Gross BC, Erkal JL, Lockwood SY, Chen CP, Spence DM (2014) Evaluation of 3D printing and its potential impact on biotechnology and the chemical sciences. Anal Chem 86(7):3240–3253. doi:10.1021/ac403397r
O’Neill PF, Ben Azouz A, Vazquez M, Liu J, Marczak S, Slouka Z, Chang HC, Diamond D, Brabazon D (2014) Advances in three-dimensional rapid prototyping of microfluidic devices for biological applications. Biomicrofluidics 8(5):0001. doi:10.1063/1.4898632
McDonald JC, Chabinyc ML, Metallo SJ, Anderson JR, Stroock AD, Whitesides GM (2002) Prototyping of microfluidic devices in poly(dimethylsiloxane) using solid-object printing. Anal Chem 74(7):1537–1545. doi:10.1021/ac010938q
Lewis JA (2006) Direct ink writing of 3D functional materials. Adv Funct Mater 16(17):2193–2204. doi:10.1002/adfm.200600434
Mannoor MS, Jiang ZW, James T, Kong YL, Malatesta KA, Soboyejo WO, Verma N, Gracias DH, McAlpine MC (2013) 3D printed bionic ears. Nano Lett 13(6):2634–2639. doi:10.1021/nl4007744
Obata K, El-Tamer A, Koch L, Hinze U, Chichkov BN (2013) High-aspect 3D two-photon polymerization structuring with widened objective working range (WOW-2PP). Light-Sci Appl 2:0001. doi:10.1038/lsa.2013.72
Au AK, Lee W, Folch A (2014) Mail-order microfluidics: evaluation of stereolithography for the production of microfluidic devices. Lab Chip 14(7):1294–1301. doi:10.1039/c3lc51360b
Hengsbach S, Lantada AD (2014) Rapid prototyping of multi-scale biomedical microdevices by combining additive manufacturing technologies. Biomed Microdevices 16(4):617–627. doi:10.1007/s10544-014-9864-2
Nguyen NT, Huang XY, Chuan TK (2002) MEMS-micropumps: a review. J Fluid Eng-T Asme 124(2):384–392. doi:10.1115/1.1459075
Duwairi H, Abdullah M (2007) Thermal and flow analysis of a magneto-hydrodynamic micropump. Microsyst Technol 13(1):33–39. doi:10.1007/s00542-006-0258-0
Brask A, Kutter JP, Bruus H (2005) Long-term stable electroosmotic pump with ion exchange membranes. Lab Chip 5(7):730–738. doi:10.1039/b503626g
Byun CK, Abi-Samra K, Cho YK, Takayama S (2014) Pumps for microfluidic cell culture. Electrophoresis 35(2–3):245–257. doi:10.1002/elps.201300205
Zeng SL, Chen CH, Mikkelsen JC, Santiago JG (2001) Fabrication and characterization of electroosmotic micropumps. Sensor Actuat B-Chem 79(2–3):107–114. doi:10.1016/S0925-4005(01)00855-3
Sheybani R, Cobo A, Meng E (2015) Wireless programmable electrochemical drug delivery micropump with fully integrated electrochemical dosing sensors. Biomed Microdevices 17(4):0001. doi:10.1007/s10544-015-9980-7
Clime L, Brassard D, Geissler M, Veres T (2015) Active pneumatic control of centrifugal microfluidic flows for lab-on-a-chip applications. Lab Chip 15(11):2400–2411. doi:10.1039/c4lc01490a
Kim J, Stockton AM, Jensen EC, Mathies RA (2016) Pneumatically actuated microvalve circuits for programmable automation of chemical and biochemical analysis. Lab Chip 16(5):812–819. doi:10.1039/c5lc01397f
Sahu PK, Golia A, Sen AK (2013) Investigations into mixing of fluids in microchannels with lateral obstructions. Microsyst Technol 19(4):493–501. doi:10.1007/s00542-012-1617-7
DeLong SA, Moon JJ, West JL (2005) Covalently immobilized gradients of bFGF on hydrogel scaffolds for directed cell migration. Biomaterials 26(16):3227–3234. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.09.021
Wang F (2009) The signaling mechanisms underlying cell polarity and chemotaxis. Csh Perspect Biol 1(4):0001. doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a002980
Schmidt S, Friedl P (2010) Interstitial cell migration: integrin-dependent and alternative adhesion mechanisms. Cell Tissue Res 339(1):83–92. doi:10.1007/s00441-009-0892-9
Chiang HC, Wang YS, Chou CH, Liao AT, Chu RM, Lin CS (2012) Overexpression of chemokine ligand 7 is associated with the progression of canine transmissible venereal tumor. Bmc Vet Res 8:0001. doi:10.1186/1746-6148-8-216
Ahmed D, Chan CY, Lin SCS, Muddana HS, Nama N, Benkovic SJ, Huang TJ (2013) Tunable, pulsatile chemical gradient generation via acoustically driven oscillating bubbles. Lab Chip 13(3):328–331. doi:10.1039/c2lc40923b
Diao JP, Young L, Kim S, Fogarty EA, Heilman SM, Zhou P, Shuler ML, Wu MM, DeLisa MP (2006) A three-channel microfluidic device for generating static linear gradients and its application to the quantitative analysis of bacterial chemotaxis. Lab Chip 6(3):381–388. doi:10.1039/b511958h
Keenan TM, Frevert CW, Wu A, Wong V, Folch A (2010) A new method for studying gradient-induced neutrophil desensitization based on an open microfluidic chamber. Lab Chip 10(1):116–122. doi:10.1039/b913494h
Jeon NL, Dertinger SKW, Chiu DT, Choi IS, Stroock AD, Whitesides GM (2000) Generation of solution and surface gradients using microfluidic systems. Langmuir 16(22):8311–8316. doi:10.1021/La000600b
Liu Y, Butler WB, Pappas D (2012) Spatially selective reagent delivery into cancer cells using a two-layer microfluidic culture system. Anal Chim Acta 743:125–130. doi:10.1016/j.aca.2012.06.054
Sun M, Bithi SS, Vanapalli SA (2011) Microfluidic static droplet arrays with tuneable gradients in material composition. Lab Chip 11(23):3949–3952. doi:10.1039/c1lc20709a
Brammer KS, Choi C, Frandsen CJ, Oh S, Jin S (2011) Hydrophobic nanopillars initiate mesenchymal stem cell aggregation and osteo-differentiation. Acta Biomater 7(2):683–690. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2010.09.022
Kim NY, Adhikari KK, Dhakal R, Chuluunbaatar Z, Wang C, Kim ES (2015) Rapid, sensitive, and reusable detection of glucose by a robust radiofrequency integrated passive device biosensor chip. Sci Rep-Uk 5:0001. doi:10.1038/Srep07807
Balakrishnan SR, Hashim U, Letchumanan GR, Kashif M, Ruslinda AR, Liu WW, Veeradasan P, Prasad RH, Foo KL, Poopalan P (2014) Development of highly sensitive polysilicon nanogap with APTES/GOx based lab-on-chip biosensor to determine low levels of salivary glucose. Sensor Actuat a-Phys 220:101–111. doi:10.1016/j.sna.2014.09.027
Osterberg FW, Rizzi G, Donolato M, Bejhed RS, Mezger A, Stromberg M, Nilsson M, Stromme M, Svedlindh P, Hansen MF (2014) On-chip detection of rolling circle amplified DNA molecules from Bacillus globigii spores and Vibrio cholerae. Small 10(14):2877–2882. doi:10.1002/smll.201303325
Clark LC, Lyons C (1962) Electrode systems for continuous monitoring in cardiovascular surgery. Ann N Y Acad Sci 102(1):29. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1962.tb13623.x
Oh SJ, Park BH, Choi G, Seo JH, Jung JH, Choi JS, Kim DH, Seo TS (2016) Fully automated and colorimetric foodborne pathogen detection on an integrated centrifugal microfluidic device. Lab Chip 16(10):1917–1926. doi:10.1039/c6lc00326e
Thompson BL, Birch C, Nelson DA, Li JY, DuVall JA, Le Roux D, Tsuei AC, Mills DL, Root BE, Landers JP (2016) A centrifugal microfluidic device with integrated gold leaf electrodes for the electrophoretic separation of DNA. Lab Chip 16(23):4569–4580. doi:10.1039/c6lc00953k
Lee A, Park J, Lim M, Sunkara V, Kim SY, Kim GH, Kim MH, Cho YK (2014) All-in-one centrifugal microfluidic device for size-selective circulating tumor cell isolation with high purity. Anal Chem 86(22):11349–11356. doi:10.1021/ac5035049
Yamashita H, Morita M, Sugiura H, Fujiwara K, Onoe H, Takinoue M (2015) Generation of monodisperse cell-sized microdroplets using a centrifuge-based axisymmetric co-flowing microfluidic device. J Biosci Bioeng 119(4):492–495. doi:10.1016/j.jbiosc.2014.09.018
Araci IE, Su BL, Quake SR, Mandel Y (2014) An implantable microfluidic device for self-monitoring of intraocular pressure. Nat Med 20(9):1074–1078. doi:10.1038/nm.3621
Kim DH, Viventi J, Amsden JJ, Xiao JL, Vigeland L, Kim YS, Blanco JA, Panilaitis B, Frechette ES, Contreras D, Kaplan DL, Omenetto FG, Huang YG, Hwang KC, Zakin MR, Litt B, Rogers JA (2010) Dissolvable films of silk fibroin for ultrathin conformal bio-integrated electronics. Nat Mater 9(6):511–517. doi:10.1038/NMAT2745
Farra R, Sheppard NF, McCabe L, Neer RM, Anderson JM, Santini JT, Cima MJ, Langer R (2012) First-in-human testing of a wirelessly controlled drug delivery microchip. Sci Transl Med 4(122):0001. doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.3003276
Kim DH, Lu NS, Ma R, Kim YS, Kim RH, Wang SD, Wu J, Won SM, Tao H, Islam A, Yu KJ, Kim TI, Chowdhury R, Ying M, Xu LZ, Li M, Chung HJ, Keum H, McCormick M, Liu P, Zhang YW, Omenetto FG, Huang YG, Coleman T, Rogers JA (2011) Epidermal electronics. Science 333(6044):838–843. doi:10.1126/science.1206157
Meng E, Sheybani R (2014) Insight: implantable medical devices. Lab Chip 14(17):3233–3240. doi:10.1039/c4lc00127c
Yang K, Peretz-Soroka H, Liu Y, Lin F (2016) Novel developments in mobile sensing based on the integration of microfluidic devices and smartphones. Lab Chip 16(6):943–958. doi:10.1039/c5lc01524c
Zhu HY, Sikora U, Ozcan A (2012) Quantum dot enabled detection of Escherichia coli using a cell-phone. Analyst 137(11):2541–2544. doi:10.1039/c2an35071h
Li BC, Li L, Guan A, Dong Q, Ruan KC, Hu RG, Li ZY (2014) A smartphone controlled handheld microfluidic liquid handling system. Lab Chip 14(20):4085–4092. doi:10.1039/c4lc00227j
Jiang J, Wang XH, Chao R, Ren YK, Hu CP, Xu ZD, Liu GL (2014) Smartphone based portable bacteria pre-concentrating microfluidic sensor and impedance sensing system. Sensor Actuat B-Chem 193:653–659. doi:10.1016/j.snb.2013.11.103
Martinez AW, Phillips ST, Carrilho E, Thomas SW, Sindi H, Whitesides GM (2008) Simple telemedicine for developing regions: camera phones and paper-based microfluidic devices for real-time, off-site diagnosis. Anal Chem 80(10):3699–3707. doi:10.1021/ac800112r
Lu Y, Shi WW, Qin JH, Lin BC (2009) Low cost, portable detection of gold nanoparticle-labeled microfluidic immunoassay with camera cell phone. Electrophoresis 30(4):579–582. doi:10.1002/elps.200800586
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lin, L., Lin, JM. (2018). Design and Preparation of Microfluidics Device. In: Lin, JM. (eds) Cell Analysis on Microfluidics. Integrated Analytical Systems. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5394-8_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5394-8_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-5393-1
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-5394-8
eBook Packages: Chemistry and Materials ScienceChemistry and Material Science (R0)