Abstract
As web surveys increase in popularity, the focus in the research industry on telephone surveys continues to decline. However, phone surveys are far from becoming extinct. Limited Internet access among certain populations (including older and lower income groups) makes telephone a preferred methodology when broad cross-sections of a population need to be reached, such as in the health research arena, where large-scale surveys such as the Behavior Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFS), California Health Interview Survey (CHIS), and the Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS) rely on telephone surveys. An understudied but critical component of phone surveys is the introduction. Introductions that are effective at convincing sample members to participate can help to improve shrinking response rates in this mode. These declining response rates have the potential to contribute to nonresponse error, and interviewers contribute differentially to nonresponse. Why do some telephone interviewers have better response rates than others? What are key speech and vocal characteristics of interviewers that help their performance, and how can these characteristics be implemented in practice? This chapter will review existing literature on telephone survey introductions, examine components of an ideal introduction, and conclude with suggestions for effective interviewer training in this area.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Asch SE. Forming impressions of personality. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1946;9:283–94.
Benkí J, Broome J, Conrad F, Groves R, Kreuter F. Effects of speech rate, pitch, and pausing on survey participation decisions. Paper presented at the 66th annual conference of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Phoenix. 2011.
Broome J. Vocal characteristics, speech, and behavior of telephone interviewers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Michigan, Michigan. 2012.
Broome J. How telephone interviewers’ responsiveness impacts their success. Field Methods. 2014;27:66–81.
Broome J. First impressions of telephone interviewers. J Off Stat. 2015;31:611–25.
Campanelli P, Sturgis P, Purdon S. Can you hear me knocking: an investigation into the impact of interviewers on survey response rates. London: National Center for Social Research; 1997.
Cialdini RB. Influence: science and practice. New York: Harper Collins; 1984.
Clark HH, Schaefer EF. Contributing to discourse. Cogn Sci. 1989;13:259–94.
Conrad FG, Schober MF. Clarifying question meaning in a household telephone survey. Public Opin Q. 2000;64:1–28.
Conrad F, Broome J, Benkí J, Groves R, Kreuter F, Vannette D, McClain C. Interviewer speech and the success of survey invitations. J R Stat Soc. 2013;176(1):191–210.
Curtin R, Presser S, Singer E. Changes in telephone survey nonresponse over the past quarter century. Public Opin Q. 2005;69(1):87–98.
Dykema J, Lepkowski JM, Blixt S. The effect of interviewer and respondent behavior on data quality: analysis of interaction coding in a validation study. In: Lyberg LE, Biemer P, Collins M, de Leeuw E, Dippo C, Schwarz N, Trewin D, editors. Survey measurement and process quality. New York: Wiley; 1997. p. 311–30.
Faber A, Mazlish E. How to talk so kids will listen & listen so kids will talk. New York: Harper Collins; 1980.
Fiske ST, Cuddy AJC, Glick P. Universal dimensions of social cognition: warmth and competence. Trends Cogn Sci. 2007;11:77–83.
Groves RM, Couper MP. Nonresponse in household interview surveys. New York: Wiley; 1998.
Groves RM, McGonagle K. A theory-guided interviewer training protocol regarding survey participation. J Off Stat. 2001;17:249–65.
Groves RM, Presser S, Dipko S. The role of topic interest in survey participation decisions. Public Opin Q. 2004;68(1):2–31.
Groves RM, O’Hare BC, Gould-Smith D, Benkí J, Maher P. Telephone interviewer voice characteristics and the survey participation decision. In: Lepkowski JM, Tucker C, Brick JM, de Leeuw ED, Japec L, Lavrakas PJ, Link MW, Sangster RL, editors. Advances in telephone survey methodology. New York: Wiley; 2007. p. 385–400.
Houtkoop-Steenstra H, van den Bergh H. Effects of introductions in large-scale telephone survey interviews. Sociol Methods Res. 2000;28(3):281–300.
Ketrow SM. Attributes of a telemarketer’s voice and persuasiveness: a review and synthesis of the literature. J Direct Mark. 1990;4:7–21.
Morton-Williams J. Interviewer approaches. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1993.
O’Muircheartaigh C, Campanelli P. A multilevel exploration of the role of interviewers in survey non-response. J R Stat Soc Ser A. 1999;162(3):437–46.
Oksenberg L, Cannell C. Effects of interviewer vocal characteristics on nonresponse. In: Groves RM, Biemer PB, Lyberg LE, Massey JT, Nichols II WL, Waksberg J, editors. Telephone survey methodology. New York: Wiley; 1988. p. 257–72.
Oksenberg L, Coleman L, Cannell C. Interviewers’ voices and refusal rates in telephone surveys. Public Opin Q. 1986;50(1):97–111.
Pondman LM. The influence of the interviewer on the refusal rate in telephone interviews. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam. 1998.
Schaefer NC, Garbarski D, Maynard DW, Freese J. Interactional environments, requests, and participation in the survey interview. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Phoenix. 2011.
Schober MF, Conrad FG. Does conversational interviewing reduce survey measurement error? Public Opin Q. 1997;61:576–602.
Sharf DJ, Lehman ME. Relationship between the speech characteristics and effectiveness of telephone interviewers. J Phon. 1984;12(3):219–28.
Snijkers G, Hox J, de Leeuw ED. Interviewers’ tactics for fighting survey nonresponse. J Off Stat. 1999;15(2):185–98.
Steinkopf L, Bauer G, Best H. Nonresponse in CATI-surveys. Methods Data Anal. 2010;4(1):3–26.
Teitler JO, Reichman NE, Sprachman S. Costs and benefits of improving response rates for a hard-to-reach population. Public Opin Q. 2003;67:126–38.
Van der Vaart W, Ongena Y, Hoogendoorn A, Dijkstra W. Do interviewers’ voice characteristics influence cooperation rates in telephone surveys? Int J Opin Res. 2005;18(4):488–99.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Broome, J. (2019). Phone Surveys: Introductions and Response Rates. In: Liamputtong, P. (eds) Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5251-4_26
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5251-4_26
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-5250-7
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-5251-4
eBook Packages: Social SciencesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences