Abstract
This chapter explores feminist dilemmas in researching women’s violence. It suggests that women’s use of violence is a sensitive topic for feminist researchers because feminists have sought to delineate the role of male violence in continuing women’s subordination. Highlighting women’s violence potentially detracts from this. Feminists also wish to avoid lending credence to misogynistic and antifeminist stereotypes, which inaccurately claim that women are equally as violent as men. Researching women’s violence using feminist methodologies, which place value on creating knowledge from women’s experiences, hearing marginalized voices, and democratizing the research process, raises dilemmas. The chapter considers these dilemmas across three areas – questions of allegiance, questions of representation, and questions of ambivalence and compromise. Allegiance refers whether researchers are “on the side” of their research participants, which can be a complex issue if their research participants have harmed others. The politics of representation are significant to how data are interpreted and how research participants and their actions are portrayed when writing up sensitive data. Researchers may experience feelings of ambivalence when they find their research participants difficult to empathize with and this can compromise researchers by making them in some sense vulnerable. The chapter discusses a range of examples in order to highlight these issues. Due to the limited methodological literature specifically on women’s violence, it also draws on insights from other relevant feminist and criminological studies.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ballinger A. Dead woman walking: executed women in England and Wales 1900–1965. Aldershot: Ashgate; 2000.
Ballinger A. Feminist research, state power and executed women. In: Farrall S, Sparks R, Maruna S, Hough M, editors. Escape routes: contemporary perspectives on life after punishment. Abingdon: Routledge; 2011. p. 107–33.
Becker HS. Whose side are we on? Soc Probl. 1967;14(3):239–47.
Blackman SJ. “Hidden ethnography”: crossing emotional borders in qualitative accounts of young people’s lives. Sociology. 2007;41(4):699–716.
Blagdon N, Pemberton S. The challenge of conducting qualitative research with convicted sex offenders. Howard J. 2010;49(3):269–81.
Burman M, Batchelor SA, Brown JA. Researching girls and violence: facing the dilemmas of fieldwork. Br J Criminol. 2001;41(3):443–59.
Burman M, Brown J, Batchelor S. Taking it to heart: girls and the meaning of violence. In: Stanko EA, editor. The meanings of violence. London: Routledge; 2003. p. 71–89.
Campbell R. Emotionally involved: the impact of researching rape. London: Routledge; 2002.
Cowburn M. Men researching men in prison: the challenges for profeminist research. Howard J. 2007;46(3):276–88.
DeKeseredy WS. Violence against women: myths, facts, controversies. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; 2011.
Dickson-Swift V, James EL, Kippen S, Liamputtong P. Doing sensitive research: what challenges do qualitative researchers face? Qual Res. 2007;7(3):327–53.
Dickson-Swift V, James EL, Liamputtong P. Undertaking sensitive research in the health and social sciences: managing boundaries, emotions and risks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2008.
England KVL. Getting personal: reflexivity, positionality, and feminist research. Prof Geogr. 1994;46(1):80–9.
Fitzroy L. Violent women: questions for feminist theory, practice and policy. Crit Soc Policy. 2001;21(1):7–34.
Friedman T. Feeling. In: Ely M, Anzul M, editors. Doing qualitative research: circles within circles. London: Routledge; 1991. p. 107–38.
Frigon S. Mapping scripts and narratives of women who kill their husbands in Canada 1866–1954: inscribing the everyday. In: Burfoot A, editor. Killing women: the visual culture of gender violence. Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier Press; 2006. p. 3–20.
Godfrey B. “Dear reader I killed him”: ethical and emotional issues in researching convicted murderers through the analysis of interview transcripts. Oral Hist. 2003;31(1):54–64.
Griffin G. The compromised researcher: issues in feminist research methodologies. Sociol Forskn. 2012;49(4):333–47.
Hall S. New ethnicities. In: Morely D, Chen K-H, editors. Stuart Hall: critical dialogues in cultural studies. London: Routledge; 1996. p. 442–51.
Heberle R. Law’s violence and the challenge of the feminine. Stud Law Polit Soc. 2001;22:49–73.
Hesse-Biber SN. Feminist research: exploring, interrogating, and transforming the interconnections of epistemology, methodology, and method. In: Hesse-Biber SN, editor. Handbook of feminist research: theory and praxis. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2012. p. 2–26.
Hester M. Who does what to whom? Gender and domestic violence perpetrators in English police records. Eur J Criminol. 2013;10(5):623–37.
Hester M, Donovan C. Researching domestic violence in same-sex relationships – a feminist epistemological approach to survey development. J Lesbian Stud. 2009;13(2):161–73.
Holland J. Emotions and research. Int J Soc Res. 2007;10(3):195–209.
Hollway W, Jefferson T. Doing qualitative research differently. 2nd ed. London: Sage; 2012.
Jackson S, Backett-Milburn K, Newall E. Researching distressing topics: emotional reflexivity and emotional labour in the secondary analysis of children and young people’s narratives of abuse. Sage Open, April–June, 2013. p. 1–12.
Kirsch GE. Ethical dilemmas in feminist research: the politics of location, interpretation and publication. Albany: State University of New York Press; 1999.
Kruttschnitt C, Carbone-Lopez K. Moving beyond the stereotypes: women’s subjective accounts of their violent crime. Criminology. 2006;44(2):321–51.
Lee RM, Renzetti CM. The problems of researching sensitive topics: an overview and introduction. In: Lee RM, Stanko EA, editors. Researching sensitive topics. London: Sage; 1993. p. 49–65.
Liamputtong P. Researching the vulnerable: a guide to sensitive research methods. London: Sage; 2007.
Liebling A. Whose side are we on? Theory, practice and allegiances in prisons research. Br J Criminol. 2001;41(3):472–84.
Liebling A, Stanko B. Allegiance and ambivalence: some dilemmas in researching disorder and violence. Br J Criminol. 2001;41(3):421–30.
Luff D. Dialogue across the divides: ‘moments of rapport’ and power in feminist research with anti-feminist women. Sociology. 1999;33(4):687–703.
Matravers A. Understanding women who commit sex offences. In: Letherby G, Williams K, Birch P, Cain M, editors. Sex as crime? London: Routledge; 2008. p. 299–320.
Morrissey B. When women kill: questions of agency and subjectivity. London: Routledge; 2003.
Oberman M, Meyer C. When mothers kill: interviews from prison. New York: New York University Press; 2008.
Plummer K. Documents of life 2: an invitation to a critical humanism. London: Sage; 2001.
Preissle J, Han Y. Feminist research ethics. In: Hesse-Biber SN, editor. Handbook of feminist research: theory and praxis. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2012. p. 583–605.
Presser L. Negotiating power and narrative in research: implications for feminist methodology. Signs. 2005;30(4):2067–90.
Ramazanoglu C, Holland J. Feminist methodology: challenges and choices. London: Sage; 2002.
Reeves CL. A difficult negotiation: fieldwork relations with gatekeepers. Qual Res. 2010;10(3):315–31.
Renzetti C. The challenge to feminism posed by women’s use of violence in intimate relationships. In: Lamb S, editor. New versions of victims: feminists struggle with the concept. New York: New York University Press; 1999. p. 42–56.
Ristock JL. No more secrets: violence in lesbian relationships. London: Routledge; 2002.
Seal L. Issues of gender and class in the Mirror newspapers’ campaign for the release of Edith Chubb. Crime Media Cult. 2009a;5(1):57–78.
Seal L. Discourses of single women accused of murder: mid twentieth-century constructions of ‘lesbians’ and ‘spinsters’. Women’s Stud Int Forum. 2009b;32(3):209–18.
Seal L. Women, murder and femininity: gender representations of women who kill. Basingstoke: Palgrave; 2010.
Seal L. Emotion and allegiance in researching four mid-20th-century cases of women accused of murder. Qual Res. 2012;12(6):686–701.
Skinner T, Hester M, Malos E. Methodology, feminism and gender violence. In: Skinner T, Hester M, Malos E, editors. Researching gender violence. Cullompton: Willan; 2005. p. 1–22.
Sollund R. Tested neutrality: emotional challenges in qualitative interviews on homicide and rape. J Scand Stud Criminol Crime Prev. 2008;9(2):181–201.
Stanko EA, Lee RM. Introduction: methodological reflections. In: Lee RM, Stanko EA, editors. Researching violence. London: Routeldge; 2003. p. 1–11.
Wilczynski A. Mad or bad?: child killers, gender and the courts. Br J Criminol. 1997;37(3):419–24.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Seal, L. (2019). Feminist Dilemmas in Researching Women’s Violence: Issues of Allegiance, Representation, Ambivalence, and Compromise. In: Liamputtong, P. (eds) Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5251-4_132
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5251-4_132
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-5250-7
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-5251-4
eBook Packages: Social SciencesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences