Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Machine Tool Prognosis for Precision Manufacturing

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Metrology

Part of the book series: Precision Manufacturing ((PRECISION))

  • 254 Accesses

Abstract

Increasing demand for precision-manufactured parts for high-tech applications in aerospace, nuclear power, transportation, etc. continually drives the advancement of precision manufacturing technologies. As the precision and quality of manufactured parts are significantly affected by the performance of the machine tools, accurate and reliable condition monitoring, performance prediction, and maintenance of machine tools become one important part of precision manufacturing. In this chapter, a stochastic modeling technique is presented for prediction of machine tool performance degradation based on sensing data from the tool wear. Specifically, to account for the nonlinear and non-Gaussian characteristic of operating and environmental conditions on the wear propagation and machine performance degradation, particle filter (PF) that approximates probability distributions through a set of weighted particles is investigated. To improve the reliability of time-varying degradation tracking and prediction, an adaptive resampling particle filter method is developed. Specifically, particles are recursively updated and resampled from the neighborhoods that are determined by particles’ estimation performance from the last iteration, to characterize the temporal variation in the tool degradation rates. This leads to improved tracking and prediction accuracy with progressively narrowed confidence interval. The developed method has been experimentally evaluated using a set of benchmark data that were measured on a high-speed CNC machine.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agogino A, Goebel K (2007) Milling data set. NASA Ames Prognostics Data Repository, NASA Ames Research Center

    Google Scholar 

  • An D, Choi JH, Kim NH (2013) Options for prognostics methods: a review of data-driven and physics-based prognostics. In: 54th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics, and materials conference, Boston, p 1940

    Google Scholar 

  • Arulampalam MS, Maskell S, Gordon N, Clapp T (2002) A tutorial on particle filters for online nonlinear/non-Gaussian Bayesian tracking. IEEE Trans Signal Process 50(2):174–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aslantaş K, Taşgetiren S (2004) A study of spur gear pitting formation and life prediction. Wear 257(11):1167–1175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Astakhov VP (2007) Effects of the cutting feed, depth of cut, and workpiece (bore) diameter on the tool wear rate. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 34(7–8):631–640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baraldi P, Mangili F, Zio E (2013) Investigation of uncertainty treatment capability of model- based and data-driven prognostic methods using simulated data. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 112:94–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne G, O’Donnell GE (2007) An integrated force sensor solution for process monitoring of drilling operations. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 56(1):89–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caesarendra W, Widodo A, Thom PH, Yang B, Setiawan JD (2011) Combined probability approach and indirect data-driven method for bearing degradation prognostics. IEEE Trans Reliab 60(1):14–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dornfeld DA, Lee Y, Chang A (2003) Monitoring of ultraprecision machining processes. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 21(8):571–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doucet A, Godsill S, Andrieu C (2000) On sequential Monte Carlo sampling methods for Bayesian filtering. Stat Comput 10(3):197–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doucet A, Gordon NJ, Krishnamurthy V (2001) Particle filters for state estimation of jump Markov linear systems. IEEE Trans Signal Process 49(3):613–624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eguchi S, Copas J (2006) Interpreting Kullback–Leibler divergence with the Neyman–Pearson lemma. J Multivar Anal 97(9):2034–2040

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gao R, Wang L, Teti R, Dornfeld D, Kumara S, Mori M, Helu M (2015) Cloud-enabled prognosis for manufacturing. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 64(2):749–772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gašperin M, Juričić Ɖ, Boškoski P, Vižintin J (2011) Model-based prognostics of gear health using stochastic dynamical models. Mech Syst Signal Process 25(2):537548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon NJ, Salmond DJ, Smith AF (1993) Novel approach to nonlinear/non-Gaussian Bayesian state estimation. IEE Proc F Radar Signal Process 140(2):107113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heng A, Zhang S, Tan AC, Mathew J (2009) Rotating machinery prognostics: state of the art, challenges and opportunities. Mech Syst Signal Process 23(3):724–739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman EG (1984) Fundamentals of tool design. Society of Manufacturing Engineers, Dearborn

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang Y, Liang S (2004) Modeling of CBN tool flank wear progression in finish hard turning. Trans ASME J Manuf Sci Eng 126:98–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jardine AK, Lin D, Banjevic D (2006) A review on machinery diagnostics and prognostics implementing condition-based maintenance. Mech Syst Signal Process 20(7):1483–1510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karandikar JM, Abbas AE, Schmitz TL (2013) Tool life prediction using random walk Bayesian updating. Mach Sci Technol 17(3):410–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karpuschewski B, Schmidt K, Beno J, Mankova I, Frohumller R, Prilukova J (2015) An approach to the microscopic study of wear mechanism during hard turning with coated ceramics. Wear 342–343:222–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le SK, Fouladirad M, Barros A, Levrat E, Lung B (2013) Remaining useful life estimation based on stochastic deterioration models: a comparative study. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 112:165–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li B (2012) A review of tool wear estimation using theoretical analysis and numerical simulation technologies. Int J Refract Met Hard Mater 35:143–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Lim BS, Zhou JH, Huang S, Phua SJ, Shaw KC, Er MJ (2009) Fuzzy neural network modelling for tool wear estimation in dry milling operation. In: Annual conference of the prognostics and health management society, San Diego, pp 1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo X, Cheng K, Holt R, Liu X (2005) Modeling flank wear of carbide tool insert in metal cutting. Wear 259:1235–1240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marksberry PW, Jawahir IS (2008) A comprehensive tool-wear/tool-life performance model in the evaluation of NDM (near dry machining) for sustainable manufacturing. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 48(7–8):878–886

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehnen J, Tinsley L, Roy R (2014) Automated in-service damage identification. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 63(1):33–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills B, Rdeford A (1983) Machinability of engineering materials. Applied Science, London

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Paris PC (1961) A rational analytic theory of fatigue. Trends Eng 13:9–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng Y, Dong M, Zuo MJ (2010) Current status of machine prognostics in condition-based maintenance: a review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 50(1–4):297–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poulachon G, Moisan A, Jawhir IS (2001) Tool-wear mechanisms in hard turning with polycrystalline cubic boron nitride tools. Wear 250(1–12):576–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rehorn AG, Jiang J, Orban PE (2005) State-of-the-art methods and results in tool condition monitoring: a review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 26(7–8):693–710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Si X, Wang W, Hu C, Zhou D (2011) Remaining useful life estimation-a review on the statistical data driven approaches. Eur J Oper Res 213(1):1–14

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Sikorska JZ, Hodkiewicz M, Ma L (2011) Prognostic modelling options for remaining useful life estimation by industry. Mech Syst Signal Process 25(5):1803–1836

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun B, Zeng S, Kang R, Pecht MG (2012) Benefits and challenges of system prognostics. IEEE Trans Reliab 61(2):323–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teti R, Jemielniak K, Donnell GO, Dornfeld D (2010) Advanced monitoring of machining operations. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 59(2):717–739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang P, Gao RX (2015) Adaptive resampling-based particle filtering for tool life prediction. J Manuf Syst 37:528–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang P, Gao RX (2016a) Stochastic tool wear prediction for sustainable manufacturing. Procedia CIRP 48:236–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang P, Gao RX (2016b) Markov nonlinear system estimation for engine performance tracking. ASME J Eng Gas Turbines Power 138(9):091201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang P, Gao RX (2017) Automated performance tracking for heat exchangers in HVAC. IEEE Trans Autom Sci Eng 14(2):634–645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang J, Wang P, Gao RX (2015) Enhanced particle filter for tool wear prediction. J Manuf Syst 36:35–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou Y, Xue W (2018) Review of tool condition monitoring methods in milling processes. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 96:5–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA

    Robert X. Gao & Peng Wang

  2. School of Mechanical Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, China

    Ruqiang Yan

Authors
  1. Robert X. Gao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Peng Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ruqiang Yan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert X. Gao .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Nanomechanics, Tohoku University Department of Nanomechanics, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan

    Wei Gao

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Gao, R.X., Wang, P., Yan, R. (2019). Machine Tool Prognosis for Precision Manufacturing. In: Gao, W. (eds) Metrology. Precision Manufacturing. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4912-5_8-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4912-5_8-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-4912-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-4912-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference EngineeringReference Module Computer Science and Engineering

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation