Abstract
During six decades of regional supervision, the Inter/American Commission and Court of Human Rights have exercised their role as interpreters of the human rights instruments adopted by the member states of the Organization of American States, with some degree of healthy controversy. There has been much discussion on their understanding of the states’ duty to prevent harm to individuals and communities at risk: the extent of reparations for material and nonmaterial damage caused by human rights violations including the obligation to investigate such violations, carry out prosecutions exhaustively and ensure non-repetition; and the extensive legal obligation of the judiciary and other domestic authorities to implement legal standards as interpreted by the Inter-American Court. With its idiosyncratic traditions and perspectives, the protection of human rights in the Americas is challenged by structural poverty, inequality, discrimination, violence, and weakness in the rule of law and by the remaining question on whether organs such as the Commission and Court are truly called or equipped to play a significant role in overcoming them.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abramovich V (2009) De las violaciones masivas a los patrones estructurales: nuevos enfoques y clásicas tensiones en el. Sistema Interamericano de Derechos Humanos Sur 6(11):7–39
Beloff M, Clérico L (2016) Derecho a condiciones de existencia digna y situación de vulnerabilidad en la jurisprudencia de la Corte Interamericana. Estudios Constitucionales 14(1):139–178
Carozza P (2003) From conquest to constitutions: retrieving a Latin American tradition of the idea of human rights. Hum Rights Q 25(2):281–313
Corte Constitucional – Colombia (2003) Decision T-558/03 (Caso T-719935) Tutela Matilde Velásquez Restrepo c. Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores y Ministerio del Interior, 10 de juio de 2003
Corte Suprema de Justicia de la Nación – Argentina (2004), (Expediente 224. XXXIX), “Espósito, Miguel Angel s/incidente de prescripción de la acción penal promovido por su defensa”, 23 de diciembre de 2004, considerando 6
Corte Suprema de Justicia de la Nacion – Argentina (2017) SJ368/1998(34-M)/CS1 Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores y Culto s/informe sentencia dictada en el caso Fontevecchia y D’Amico vs. Argentina por la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos, febrero 2017
Duhaime B (2014) Subsidiarity in the Americas. What room is there for deference in the inter-America system? In: Gruszczynsky L, Werner W (eds) Deference in international courts and tribunals. Oxford University Press, Oxford
ECLAC (2017) Social panorama of Latin America 2017. ECLAC, Santiago de Chile
García Ramírez S (2015) The relationship between inter-American jurisdiction and states (national systems): some pertinent questions. Notre Dame J Int Comp Law 5(1):115–152
Gargarella R (2013) Latin American constitutionalism 1810–2010: the engine room of the constitution. Oxford University Press, New York
I/A Court H.R. (1988) Case of Velásquez Rodríguez v. Honduras. Merits. Judgment of July 29, 1988. Series C no. 4
I/A Court H.R. (1989) Interpretation of the American declaration of the rights and duties of man within the framework of article 64 of the American convention on human rights, advisory opinion OC10/89, opinion of July 14, 1898. Series A no 10
I/A Court H.R. (1999) Case of the street children (Villagran Morales et al.) v. Guatemala. Merits. Judgment November 19, 1999. Series C no. 63
I/A Court H.R. (2001a) Case of Barrios Altos v. Peru. Merits. Judgment March 14, 2001. Series C no. 75
I/A Court H.R. (2001b) Case of the Mayagna (sumo) Awas Tingni community v. Nicaragua. Merits, reparations and costs. Judgment of August 31, 2001. Series C no. 79
I/A Court H.R. (2002) Case of Hilaire, Constantine and Benjamin et al. v. Trinidad and Tobago. Merits, reparations and costs. Judgment of June 21, 2002. Series C no. 94
I/A Court H.R. (2004) Matter of the Mendoza prisons regarding Argentina. Provisional measures. Order of the inter-American court of human rights of November 22, 2004 (only in Spanish)
I/A Court H.R. (2005) Matter of the communities of Jiguamiandó and Curvaradó regarding Colombia. Provisional measures. Order of the inter-American court of human rights of march 15, 2005 (only in Spanish)
I/A Court H.R. (2006a) Case of the pueblo Bello massacre v. Colombia. Merits, reparations and costs. Judgment of January 31, 2006. Series C no. 140
I/A Court H.R. (2006b) Case of the Sawhoyamaxa indigenous community v. Paraguay. Merits, reparations and costs. Judgment of March 29, 2006. Series C no. 146
I/A Court H.R. (2006c) Case of Almonacid Arellano et al. v. Chile. Preliminary objections, merits, reparations and costs. Judgment of September 26, 2006. Series C no. 154
I/A Court H.R. (2007) Case of the Saramaka people. v. Suriname. Preliminary objections, merits, reparations, and costs. Judgment of November 28, 2007 Series C no. 172
I/A Court H.R. (2009) Case of González et al. (“cotton field”) v. Mexico. Preliminary objection, merits, reparations and costs. Judgment of November 16, 2009. Series C no. 205
I/A Court H.R. (2011) Case of Fontevecchia and D’Amico v. Argentina. Merits, reparations and costs. Judgment of November 29, 2011. Series C no. 238
I/A Court H.R. (2012) Case of Atala Riffo and daughters v. Chile. Merits, reparations and costs. Judgment of February 24, 2012. Series C no. 239
I/A Court H.R. (2015) Case of Gonzales Lluy et al. v. Ecuador. Preliminary objections, merits, reparations and costs. Judgment of September 1, 2015. Series C no. 298
IACHR (1986) IACHR, annual report of the inter-American commission on human rights 1985–1986, OEA/SerL/V/II68, Doc 8 rev 1, 26 September 1986, Chapter V
IACHR (2003) Annual report of the IACHR 2003 OEA/Ser.L/V/II. 118 Doc. 5 rev. 2, 29 December 2003, Chapter III, section C.1
IACHR (2004) Annual report of the IACHR 2004 OEA/Ser.L/V/II.122 Doc. 5 rev. 1, 23 February 2005, Chapter III, section C.1
IACHR (2006) Report on the situation of human rights defenders in the Americas, OEA/Ser.L/V/II.124 Doc. 5 rev.1
IACHR (2011) The death penalty in the inter-American human rights system: from restrictions to abolition OEA/Ser.L/V/II. Doc. 68 31 December 2011
IACHR (2015) Towards the closure of Guantanamo Bay OAS/Ser.L/V/II. Doc. 20/15 3 June 2015
IACHR (2017a) Report on poverty and human rights in the Americas OEA/Ser.L/V/II.164 Doc, 7 September 2017
IACHR (2017b) IACHR strategic plan 2017–2021 OEA/Ser.L/V/II.161Doc. 27/17 20 March 2017
IIDH (2012) Proceso de Fortalecimiento del Sistema Interamericano de Derechos Humanos Contexto histórico y politico. Available at http://www.oas.org/es/cidh/consulta/docs/contexto_historico_y_politico_del_sidh_2012_cidh.pdf. Accessed 12 Apr 2018
Moyn S (2010) The last utopia. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Nogueira H (2013) El Control del Convencionalidad y el dialogo interjurisdiccional entre tribunales nacionales y la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos. Anuario de Derecho Constitucional Latinoamericano XIX:511–553
OAS (1960) Final act of the fifth meeting of consultation of ministers of foreign affairs, Santiago, Chile, August 12–18, 1959. OAS official records, OEA/SerC/II5:11
Obregon L (2004) The colluding worlds of the lawyer, the scholar and the policymaker: a view of international law from Latin America. Wisconsin Int Law J 23(1):145–172
Obregon L (2009) The universal declaration of human rights and Latin America. Md J Int’l L 24:94–98
Reque L (1973) The Organization of American States and the protection of human rights. In: Inter-American yearbook on human rights 1968. OAS General Secretariat, Washington, DC, pp 220–234
Sikkink K (2015) Latin America’s protagonist role in human rights. Sur Int J Hum Rights 12(22):207–219
Tittemore B (2004) The mandatory death penalty in the commonwealth Caribbean and the inter-American human rights system: an evolution in the development and implementation of international human rights protections. William Mary Bill Rights J 13(2):445–520
World Bank (2016) Poverty and inequality and monitoring Latin America and the Caribbean: a slowdown on social gains. Available at http://pubdocs.worldbank.org/en/797001460055022577/A-Slowdown-in-Social-Gains-LAC-Poverty-Inequality-Monitoring-April-2016.pdf. Accessed 12 Apr 2018
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Gomez, V. (2018). The Inter-American Commission and Court of Human Rights. In: Oberleitner, G. (eds) International Human Rights Institutions, Tribunals, and Courts. International Human Rights. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4516-5_17-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4516-5_17-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-4516-5
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-4516-5
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Law and CriminologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences