Abstract
Chemicals in the form of fertilizers and pesticides have been used in boosting agricultural productivity and crop protection since years. The adverse effects such as environmental toxicity and long residual action resulting from excessive use of these chemicals have prompted the search for nontoxic eco-friendly biological agents. Microbes have emerged as eco-friendly alternate to achieve enhanced plant productivity and protection. Microorganisms colonize rhizosphere/interior of the plant, thereby promoting growth of plants by increasing the availability of essential nutrients such as nitrogen and phosphorus and providing growth regulators. Microbes and their supplements also provide protection against various pests and pathogens. Biofertilizers and biopesticides serve as an eco-friendly substitute to toxic chemicals and form an important component of integrated nutrient management system. Efficiency of both biopesticides and biofertilizers can be increased by molecular approaches. The present chapter highlights the role of biofertilizers and biopesticides in crop improvement and hence achievement of sustainable agriculture.
Access provided by CONRICYT-eBooks. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
10.1 Biofertilizers
Biofertilizers are preparations containing strains of microorganisms which are efficient in providing nutrients to plants through rhizospheric interactions. Microbes as biofertilizers improve soil properties, help in expansion of the root system, and increase availability of micro- and macronutrients via nitrogen fixation, phosphate and potassium solubilization or mineralization, release of plant growth-regulating substances, production of antibiotics and biodegradation of organic matter in the soil (Arun 2007; Singh and Prasad 2011; Yosefi et al. 2011; Mohammadi and Sohrabi 2012; Kawalekar 2013; Mishra et al. 2013; Raja 2013; Deepak et al. 2014; Patel et al. 2014; Seiber et al. 2014). The use of biofertilizers has proven effective in promoting growth of crop plants such as rice, pulses, millets, cotton, sugarcane, and vegetables crops (Rajasekaran and Sundaramoorthy 2010; Singh et al. 2014) (Table 10.1).
Microbes are applied to seed and plant surfaces (specifically roots) as inoculants (Chen 2006; Khan et al. 2011a, b, c; Mazid et al. 2011a; Raghuwanshi 2012; Gupta and Sen 2013). The supplementation of microbes increases the organic matter of the soil, thereby improving the exchange capacity of nutrients, increasing soil water retention, and buffers the soil against acidity, alkalinity, salinity, pesticides and toxic heavy metals. Longer shelf life (12–24 months), no contamination, easy storage without loss of properties (up to 45 °C), and effective dosage of biofertilizers provide optimum nutrients to plants for their growth and yield (Thakore 2004).
Commercialization of biofertilizers has been promoted by various organizations in different countries. NifTAL (USA) promoted the popularization of Rhizobium inoculants. Some of the commercially available biofertilizers include:
-
1.
Rhizonik (Rhizobium) – inoculation groups available for legume crops
-
2.
Azonik (Azotobacter chroococcum) – nonsymbiotic bacteria used for all cereals
-
3.
Spironik (Azospirillum brasilense) – used for grasses and similar type of crops
-
4.
Phosphonive (phosphate-solubilizing inoculant) – bacteria as well as fungi and used for solubilizing P
-
5.
Sulphonik (sulfur-oxidizing inoculant) – bacteria and fungi that enhance the availability of sulfur
-
6.
Phospho-sulphonik – contains equal mixtures of phosphonive and sulphonive
-
7.
Niku-2000 (decomposing culture) – inoculant degrades all cellulolytic and lignolutic organic matter, thereby releasing nutrients to plants
-
8.
Trichonik (Trichoderma viride) – restricts the growth of disease-producing organism
-
9.
Vermiculture – mixed with N-fixing inoculant and P solubilizers so that nutrient value is increased
Besides several positive aspects of biofertilizers, their application in agriculture is restricted because of the variable response of plant species or genotypes to inoculation depending on the bacterial strain used. The success of a bacterial strain usage depends upon the saprophytic competence and competitive ability (Khan and Naeem 2011; Mazid et al. 2012a) (Table 10.2).
10.2 Types of Biofertilizers
10.2.1 Nitrogen Fixers
Many bacterial species are symbiotic in nature and fix atmospheric nitrogen. These mainly include Rhizobium (Rhizobiaceae) which fix nitrogen in legumes at 50–100 kg ha−1. They colonize the roots of legumes to form tumor-like growths called root nodules. It is useful for pulse legumes and forage legumes. Inoculation of Rhizobium significantly increases the yields in crop plants such as pulses; legumes, viz., chickpea, red gram, bengal gram, lentil and black gram; oilseed plants like pea, lentil, soybean, and groundnut; and vegetables such as pea, alfalfa and sugar beet (Ramchandran et al. 2011; Sharma et al. 2011). The yield enhancement was noted as increased number of pods plant−1 and number of seed pod−1 and 1000 seed weight (g).
Azotobacter (Azotobacteraceae) is a genus of nonsymbiotic, aerobic, free-living heterotrophic N-fixing bacteria. The bacterium colonizes the roots and fixes N at level 25 kg ha−1. The N fixation increases the yield (up to 50%). Azotobacter vinelandii, A. beijerinckii, A. insignis, A. nigricans, A. armeniacus, A. paspali, A. chroococcum and A. macrocytogenes are the species commonly used as biofertilizers. The strain also produces antifungal antibiotics that inhibit the growth of several pathogens present in the root region and prevent seedling mortality. They improve seed germination and plant growth by producing vitamins such as thiamine and riboflavin and plant hormones such as indole acetic acid (IAA), naphthylacetic acid (NAA), gibberellins (GA) and cytokinins (CK) (Mazid et al. 2011a, b). Improvement in cereal and millet crops such as rice, wheat, sorghum, maize, pearl, millet, cotton, sesame, vegetables, cotton and sugarcane has been achieved using Azotobacter (Mazid et al. 2012a; Khan et al. 2012a; Sahoo et al. 2013a; Wani et al. 2013).
Azolla (Cyanobacteria or Blue-green algae) are phototrophic bacteria and are used as green manure. Reports suggest that one kg of Azolla fixes about 40–55 kg N ha−1, 15–20 P ha−1, and 20–25 kg K ha−1 (Sahu et al. 2012). It also produces phytohormones such as auxin, indole acetic acid and gibberellic acid. Blue-green alga (BGA) assists in biological nitrogen fixation (BNF) (Chianu et al. 2011; Olivares et al. 2013; Santi et al. 2013). Application of Azolla improves the physical and chemical properties of the soil such as N, organic matter, and cations such as Mg, Ca and Na (Carrapico et al. 2000; Bhuvaneshwari and Kumar 2013). The paddy crop has shown an increase in yield (21–34%) after application of Azolla as a biofertilizer. The number of pods plant−1, number of seed pod−1, and 1000 seed weight increased after application of Azolla (Yadav et al. 2014).
Azospirillum (Spirilaceae) are heterotrophic microbes. They are associative in nature and possess N-fixing ability (20–40 kg ha−1). Inoculations of A. amazonense, A. halopraeferens and A. brasilense have been proven beneficial to crop plants via improvement in leaf area index and yield attributes. Inoculation with Azospirillum changes the root morphology by producing plant growth-regulating substances via siderophore production. It also increases the number of lateral roots and enhances root hair formation to provide more root surface area for absorption of sufficient nutrients (Saikia et al. 2013). This improves the water status of the plant and aids the nutrient profile in the advancement of plant growth and development. High yield of maize, sugarcane, sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.), pearl millet etc. has been reported after use of Azospirillum.
Herbaspirillum is a symbiont and N-fixing bacteria. It enhances the availability of nutrients such as N, K and P and production of growth-promoting hormones (kinetin, gibberellic acid, and auxin) (Khan et al. 2011a, b, c). The N fixation capacity of 15 kg ha−1 year−1 has been reported. The synthesis of phytohormones such as IAA triggered by this biofertilizer enhances germination and root development which assist in the absorption of plant nutrients. Other nitrogen-fixing cyanobacteria used as biofertilizers include Aulosira, Tolypothrix, Scytonema, Nostoc, Anabaena, and Plectonema.
10.2.2 Phosphate Solubilizers
Bacterial species (both aerobic and anaerobic) possess the capacity to solubilize insoluble inorganic phosphate compounds, such as tricalcium phosphate, dicalcium phosphate, hydroxyapatite, and rock phosphate. The organic acids produced by these strains convert the insoluble phosphorous compounds such as tricalcium phosphate to di- and monobasic phosphates that can be easily taken up by the plant. The phosphate-solubilizing bacteria include Pseudomonas, Bacillus, Rhizobium, Burkholderia, Achromobacter, Agrobacterium, Micrococcus, Aereobacter, Flavobacterium and Erwinia (Karpagam and Nagalakshmi 2014; Rowchoudhury et al. 2015).
10.2.2.1 Zinc Solubilizers
The microorganisms such as Bacillus subtilis, Thiobacillus thiooxidans, and Saccharomyces sp. assist in the solubilization of Zn from the compounds like zinc oxide (ZnO), zinc carbonate (ZnCO3) and zinc sulfide (ZnS) (Mishra et al. 2013).
10.2.2.2 K-Solubilizing Bacteria
Bacteria such as Frateuria aurantia have shown capacity to solubilize K into a usable form. Potassium-solubilizing microorganisms (KSM) include Aspergillus, Bacillus, Clostridium, Azotobacter, Azospirillum, Phosphobacteria and Rhizobacteria. Co-inoculation of Azospirillum brasilense and Rhizobium meliloti produces a positive effect on grain yield and N, P and K content in Triticum aestivum (Mohammadi and Sohrabi 2012; Mazid and Khan 2014).
10.2.2.3 Silicate-Solubilizing Bacteria (SSB)
Microbes degrade aluminum silicates via organic acids produced by them. Hydrogen ions supplied by organic acids promote hydrolysis. These mainly include Bacillus globisporus Q12 and Bacillus sp. (Sheng et al. 2008; Kalaiselvi and Anthoniraj 2009; Ghouse et al. 2015).
10.2.3 Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR)
Rhizospheric bacteria that exert a beneficial effect on plant growth are referred as PGPRs. These include Actinoplanes, Agrobacterium, Alcaligenes, Amorphosporangium, Arthrobacter, Azotobacter, Bacillus, Cellulomonas, Enterobacter, Erwinia, Flavobacterium, Pseudomonas, Rhizobium, Bradyrhizobium, Streptomyces and Xanthomonas. These inoculants promote growth via different mechanisms which include suppression of plant disease (bioprotectants), improved nutrient acquisition (biofertilizers), or phytohormone production (biostimulants). The growth hormones such as indole acetic acid, cytokinins, and gibberellins produced by PGPR strains act as biostimulants and promote growth by increasing the absorptive surface for uptake of water and nutrients (Adesemoye et al. 2009; Gholami et al. 2009).
10.2.4 Vesicular Arbuscular Mycorrhizae (VAM)
The symbiotic association between plant roots and fungal mycelia is termed as mycorrhiza. VAM fungi infect the plant primarily through roots. Hyphae absorb nutrients such as phosphate and transfer it to internal cortical root cells. The fungal partner is benefited by obtaining its carbon requirements from the photosynthates of the host, and the host in turn is benefited by obtaining nutrients especially P, Ca, Cu and Zn. They possess special structures known as vesicles and arbuscules. The arbuscules help in the transfer of nutrients from the fungus to the root system, and the vesicles (saclike structures) store P as phospholipids. The organic acids create acidic conditions that facilitate mineralization of the nutrients (Smith et al. 2011). The phytohormones such as indole acetic acid (IAA), gibberellins (GA) and cytokinins (CK) produced by them improve photosynthesis performance, confer tolerance to stress and increase resistance to pathogens. Seed inoculation with fungal species of Glomus mosseae mycorrhiza improved corn yield via increased plant height, leaf width, number of grains per ear, and 100 seed weight.
10.3 Application of Biofertilizers and Crop Improvement
Biofertilizers are cheaper than chemical fertilizers (cost-benefit ratio of more than 1:10) (Tiwari et al. 2004), and their use results in fewer nutrient losses, economic savings and environmental protection. The effect of biofertilizers on crop plants depends upon several factors such as crop genotype, the microbial strain, and environmental conditions (soil and weather) (Şahin et al. 2004; Cakmakci et al. 2006; Dhanasekar and Dhandapani 2012). Treatment with biofertilizers particularly N fixers, PGPR, co-inoculants of PGPR and AMF increases the crop yield and productivity by enhanced nutrient use efficiency (Bhardwaj et al. 2014).
The positive effect of combined treatments of Azolla and BGA on rice yield has been reported (Askary et al. 2009). The application of BGA+ Azospirillum improved leaf area index (LAI) and all yield attributes in rice. Pusa Basmati 1 showed good yield with the application of four amendments (Azolla, BGA, vermicompost, and FYM). Use of BNF enhanced soybean (2000 kg ha−1) and other crop yields (4000–6000 kg ha−1) in Brazil, Argentina and Zimbabwe (Hungria et al. 2010; Yadav et al. 2014). Vegetables like cauliflower, broccoli, cabbage, and carrot also recorded high productivity with the use of biofertilizers (Naderifar and Daneshian 2012). Increase in maize yield has been achieved with the application of half the recommended N rate and biofertilizer, i.e., Azospirillum, in Egypt. The application of P fertilizers in combination with biofertilizers increased soybean yields by ≈47% (Woomer et al. 2014). Inoculation of Rhizobium with crop plants reduced the need for N fertilizers leading to cost saving of US$ 3 billion per cropping season in Brazil (Nicolas et al. 2006).
10.4 Role of Biofertilizers in Curtailing Stress
Mycorrhizae and other biofertilizers benefit plants exposed to drought and saline conditions. AM fungi along with N2-fixing bacteria such as Pseudomonas putida or Bacillus megaterium have shown potential in combating drought stress in legume plants. In Sudan, inoculation of Rhizobia improved yield of alfalfa, fenugreek, cluster bean, field pea and common bean grown under drought conditions (Hussain et al. 2002; Abdelgani et al. 2003). Photosynthetic efficiency and the antioxidative capacity noted an increase after inoculation of arbuscular mycorrhiza in rice plants subjected to drought stress. Inoculation of PGPR alone or along with AM-like Glomus intraradices and G. mosseae resulted in the better nutrient uptake and physiological processes. A. brasilense and AM combination improved plant tolerance to various abiotic stresses (Aroca et al. 2013). Pseudomonas inoculation improved the seedling growth and seed germination in A. officinalis L. under water stress. Rhizobium trifolii inoculated with Trifolium alexandrinum showed higher biomass and increased nodulation under salinity stress (Yang et al. 2009). P. fluorescens MSP-393 assisted in producing osmolytes and proteins that help plants in overcoming the negative effects of salt stress. P. putida Rs-198 enhance germination rate and other growth parameters such as plant height, fresh weight, and dry weight of cotton under alkaline and high-salt conditions via increasing the rate of uptake of K+, Mg2+, and Ca2+ and decreasing the absorption of Na+. Pseudomonas strains conferred tolerance in plants via 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol (DAPG). Calcisol produced by PGPRs, viz., Pseudomonas alcaligenes PsA15, Bacillus polymyxa BcP26 and Mycobacterium phlei MbP18, provides tolerance to high temperatures and salinity stress. A root endophytic fungus Piriformospora indica was found to defend plants against salt stress (Ilyas et al. 2012).
Application of biofertilizers provides protection to plants against disease and pathogens (Gao et al. 2012; Youssef and Eissa 2014). Rhizobium control seed-borne fungal infection of Colletotrichum, Ascochyta, and Helminthosporium in legume seeds. PGPR strains are found to be effective in managing the spotted wilt viruses and cucumber mosaic virus in tomato and pepper and bunchy top virus in banana. B. amyloliquefaciens 937b and B. pumilus SE-34 provide immunity against tomato mottle virus, B. megaterium IISRBP 17 acts against Phytophthora capsici, Bacillus subtilis N11 was found effective against Fusarium infestation, B. subtilis (UFLA285) was found to provide resistance against R. solani in cotton plants, Paenibacillus polymyxa SQR- 21 used for the biocontrol of Fusarium wilt in watermelon, and Glomus mosseae was effective against Fusarium oxysporum sp. causing root rot disease in basil plants (Zhang et al. 2011). Medicago truncatula also showed induction of various defense-related genes with mycorrhizal colonization. Addition of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and Pseudomonas fluorescens to the soil reduce development of root rot disease in Phaseolus vulgaris L. (Aravind et al. 2009; Joe et al. 2009; Kohler and Caravaca 2010;Yao et al. 2010).
10.5 Molecular Approaches
Genes responsible for synthesis of certain factors/proteins involved in the functioning of biofertilizers such as mycorrhizae have been identified and expressed to develop symbiotic association with plants and achieve improvement in plant growth. Genome sequencing of two EM fungi (ectomycorrhizae), L. bicolor 13 and T. melanosporum (black truffle), provides means for identification of factors that regulate the development of mycorrhiza and its function in the plant cell. Genes upregulated during symbiosis were identified as putative hexose transporters in L. bicolor. The upregulation of transporter genes during symbiosis indicated the transport of useful compounds like amino acids, oligopeptides and polyamines through the symbiotic interface from one organism to other. Cysteine-rich proteins of fungus play an important role as effectors and facilitators in the formation of symbiotic interfaces. Genes related to auxin biosynthesis and root morphogenesis show upregulation during mycorrhizal colonization. PGPR produce IAA which induces the production of nitric oxide (NO), which acts as a second messenger to trigger complex signaling network leading to improved root growth and developmental processes. Expression of ENOD11 and defense-related genes and root remodeling genes are upregulated, and genes including subtilisin protease, phosphate transporter, or two ABC transporters involved in arbuscule formation are also overexpressed. Sugarcane plantlet inoculated with a wild strain of G. diazotrophicus shows N fixation, while G. diazotrophicus mutant, i.e., without nif D gene, lacked N fixation fixing capacity.
Many disease resistance genes such as jasmonate/ethylene signaling as well as osmotic regulation via proline synthesis genes are differentially expressed in microbes such as B. subtilis (UFLA285). Metallothionein-like protein type 1, a NOD26-like membrane integral protein, ZmNIP2–1, a thionin family protein, an oryzain gamma chain precursor, stress-associated protein 1 (OsISAP1), probenazole-inducible protein PBZ1, and auxin and ethylene-responsive genes are expressed and identified. Gene encoding glucose dehydrogenase (gcd) involved in the direct oxidation pathway was cloned and characterized from Acinetobacter calcoaceticus, E. coli, and Enterobacter asburiae.
Constitutive expression of certain proteins such as HetR driven by gene hetR gene improves nitrogenase activity in Anabaena sp. strain PCC7120. G. versiforme possesses inorganic phosphate (Pi) transporters on the hyphae that help in the direct absorption of phosphate from the soil. Bioactive compounds called Myc factors similar to Nod factors of Rhizobium are suggested to be secreted by mycorrhiza and Rhizobium and perceived by host roots for the activation of signal transduction pathway or common symbiosis (SYM) pathway (Roberts et al. 2013). The common SYM pathway prepares the host plant to bring about changes at molecular and anatomical level with the contact of fungal hyphae. Calcium acts as secondary messengers via Ca2+ spiking in the nuclear region of root hairs. PGPR produce IAA which, in turn, induces the production of nitric oxide (NO), which acts as a second messenger to trigger a complex signaling network leading to improved root growth and developmental processes (Molina-Favero et al. 2007).
10.6 Biopesticides
Biopesticides encompass a broad array of microbes and biochemicals derived from microorganisms that confer protection against pest damage (Gupta and Dikshit 2010). Microbes are formulated in solid carriers like talc, peat, lignite, clay etc., while liquid formulations are prepared in solvents such as water, oil, and organic solvents. Solid formulations have shorter shelf life, susceptibility to environmental conditions, high contamination and low field performance, while liquid formulations offer longer shelf life (up to 2 years), with high purity, carrier-free activity, ease in handling and application (Mazid et al. 2011c, d). They include nutrients, cell protectants, and inducers responsible for cell/spore/cyst formation leading to improved efficacy. The microbes are present in dormant cyst form which gives rise to active cells upon application in the field, and this helps increase its shelf life for more than one year. Liquid formulations showed their efficacy against insect and nematode pests (Rao et al. 2015). They possess high selectivity to target pests, safety to humans and nontarget organisms, amenability to individual applications, integrated pest management, and suitability for organic niche products in contrast to chemical pesticides that possess broad spectrum and affect nontarget organisms including predators, parasites, as well as humans. Biopesticides mainly include fungus used in weed control, bacteria controlling fungal and bacterial diseases, and viruses active against insect pests.
Liquid formulation of pesticides shows high efficacy for longer period of time. Pseudomonas fluorescens formulation in glycerol (10 mM) shows high efficacy of pest destruction for longer duration (6 months). Addition of glycerol increased the stability of the liquid formulations of Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) used against Helicoverpa armigera. Liquid formulations of Pochonia (Verticillium) lecanii in glycerol, Tween 80, and arachnid oil effectively reduced mealy bug (Maconellicoccus hirsutus) infection in grapes. Seed treatment with liquid formulation reduced the disease incidence of Fusarium (wilt) in tomato and increased fruit yield. Bentonite oil-based liquid formulations (bentonite, corn oil, gum, glycerin) control fungus in Beauveria bassiana. Spray application of the bacterial suspensions of Agrobacterium radiobacter and Bacillus sphaericus isolates cause significant reduction (24–41%) in root infection of potato caused by cyst nematodes, Globodera pallida. Emulsion (water in oil) of M. anisopliae showed efficacy against whiteflies, Bemisia tabaci, red spider mites and Tetranychus cinnabarinus in eggplants. Liquid formulations in vitro produced endospores of bacterial bioagent, Pasteuria penetrans, that suppressed the host nematode, Belonolaimus longicaudatus, more effectively (59–63%). Liquid biopesticides of B. subtilis, Pseudomonas putida, Pseudomonas fluorescens, Paecilomyces lilacinus, Trichoderma viride and Trichoderma harzianum with shelf life more than 12 months proved their efficacy in controlling nematode pests like root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne incognita), reniform nematode (Rotylenchulus reniformis), and lesion nematodes (Radopholus similis). Liquid formulation of B. subtilis (1%) reduced root-knot nematode population to a significant extent.
The total world production of biopesticides is over 3000 tons/year. About 1400 biopesticide products are marketed worldwide, and the global market is expected to reach US$ 3.2 billion by 2014. The biopesticide market in India represents 2.89% of the overall pesticide market and is expected to reach more than US$ 1 billion (Shukla and Shukla 2012).
10.6.1 Categories of Biopesticides
Biopesticides have been broadly categorized as follows.
10.6.1.1 Microbial Pesticides
They consist of a naturally occurring or genetically modified microorganisms (e.g., a bacterium, fungus, virus, or protozoan). They are effective against kinds of pests, though each microbe is relatively specific for its target pest.
Bacteria
Bacterial biopesticides are cheaper and the most widely used biopesticides. Bacteria belonging to the genus Bacillus are most widely used pesticides. The most commonly known microbial pesticides are bacterium Bacillus thuringiensis, or Bt. This bacterium produces protein crystals that are harmful to specific insect pest. Several strains of Bt have been developed and applied to plant foliage. The ingestion of the protein crystals by insects paralyzes their digestive tracts, killing them within 24–48 h. Different Bt strains produce crystals specific for each insect or small number of related insect species. It has been successfully used in controlling caterpillars/larvae moths, mosquitoes and black flies feeding on cabbage, potatoes and other crops. The commercial preparations of B. thuringiensis contain a mixture of spores, cry protein and an inert carrier. Bt is the first commercially used biopesticide throughout the world. Control of diamondback moths, Helicoverpa and Trichoplausia ni, on cotton, pigeon pea and tomato is controlled by Bacillus thuringiensis. Till date, over hundred B. thuringiensis-based bioinsecticides have been developed and used against lepidopteran, dipteran, and coleopteran larvae. The cry genes coding for the insecticidal crystal proteins have been successfully transferred into different crop plants. B. thuringiensis and cry proteins are efficient, safe, and sustainable alternatives to chemical pesticides for the control of insect pests. These proteins form the pores or ion channels in the membrane that lead to osmotic cell lysis. In addition, cry toxin monomers promote cell death in insect cells through a mechanism involving an adenylyl cyclase/PKA signaling pathway (Zhang et al. 2006).
Bacillus subtilis, a Gram-positive rod-shaped bacterium, produces endospore. It produces antimicrobial metabolites that target bacterial and fungal soil inhabitants including plant pathogens. It promotes growth of plants by production of phytohormones, sequestration of nutrients, stimulation of systemic induced resistance in plants and suppression of plant pathogen activities. Antimicrobial metabolites from B. subtilis have been employed in biocontrol and plant protection by exploiting their antibiosis activity on phytopathogens (Romero et al. 2007).
Fungi
Fungi also control insect pests. Entomopathogenic fungi are regulators of insect populations and have potential as mycoinsecticide agents against diverse insect pests in agriculture. They invade their hosts by penetrating through the cuticle, gaining access to the hemolymph and producing toxins, and hence are used for the control of pests with piercing mouthparts such as aphids and whiteflies. Trichoderma, a fungicide has been found effective against soilborne diseases such as root rot and wilts in crops such as groundnut, black gram, green gram and chickpea (Nargund et al. 2007). Insect-pathogenic fungus Metarhizium anisopliae has been used against adult Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus mosquitoes. Fungal isolates of Beauveria bassiana, Metarhizium anisopliae and Paecilomyces fumosoroseus showed lethal effects on the eggs of the carmine spider mite, Tetranychus cinnabarinus. The ovicidal activity of the fungal species acts as biocontrol against spider mites such as T. cinnabarinus. Fungi Beauveria bassiana SG8702 and Paecilomyces fumosoroseus Pfr153 showed efficacy for control of T. cinnabarinus eggs. The potato psyllid has been controlled by Bactericera cockerelli (Sulc). Aspergillus fumigatus, Alternaria tenuissima, Penicillium spp. and Fusarium spp. produce harmful mycotoxins which also aid in pest control. Entomopathogenic fungi act as an alternate to insecticide and vital component of integrated pest management (Mazid et al. 2011b).
The combination of B. bassiana suspension and neem gave the highest B. tabaci egg and nymph mortalities with lowest LT50 value (Mazid et al. 2011b). The use of the insect-pathogenic fungus Metarhizium anisopliae was found effective against adult Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus mosquitoes. Fungal biocontrol agents such as isolates of Beauveria bassiana, Metarhizium anisopliae, and Paecilomyces fumosoroseus showed lethal effects on the eggs of the carmine spider mite, Tetranychus cinnabarinus. The fungal species showed the ovicidal activity and suggested the capacity as biocontrol agents against spider mites such as T. cinnabarinus. Isolates of entomopathogenic fungi, Beauveria bassiana SG8702 and Paecilomyces fumosoroseus Pfr153, showed effectivity against T. cinnabarinus eggs. Several other entomopathogenic fungi (Hypocreales) have been used for the control of potato psyllid, Bactericera cockerelli (Sulc).
Viruses
A family of viruses called baculoviruses infect their hosts through ingestion. They are characterized by rod-shaped enveloped virions and a circular dsDNA genome of 80–180 kbp. They control lepidopteran and sawfly forest pests. Virus particles invade the cells of the gut before colonizing the rest of the body. Infection reduces mobility and feeding and insects are killed in five to eight days. The virus kills insect pests by taking over the metabolic processes of the host insect for viral multiplication and transmission. This process involves both an active, replicating virus and the production of variety of enzymes and proteins that lead to enhanced infection and insect death (Hubbard et al. 2014).
Baculoviruses encode a number of proteins and enzymes that enhance their ability to specifically infect and replicate in insects. This increases the efficiency of spread and persistence of viruses within the host insect environment. All baculoviruses encode an occlusion body protein (polyhedrin or granulin) which forms the bulk of the proteinaceous crystal or occlusion bodies (OB) that occludes the virions in the later stages of virus replication. OB protein, polyhedrin, makes up to 30% of infected cell protein and is the powerful promoter element of the gene required for the development of baculoviruses expression system. The virion structure, novel polymerases are required for virus-specific DNA replication, gene transcription, and oral infectivity factors essential for infection of insect midgut cells. Two virion phenotypes, namely, occlusion-derived virions (ODV) and budded virions (BV), occur in baculovirus infections. ODV spread the infection to tissues orally throughout the host and infect midgut epithelial cells after ingestion and dissolution in the alkaline condition of the midgut. Upon ingestion of OB by a host insect larva, the polyhedrin protein is degraded in the alkaline environment of the insect midgut by proteases. The process releases the infectious occluded virions into the midgut lumen. The infection in the midgut epithelial cells of virions occurs via peritrophic matrix (PM), a chitin and glycoprotein layer which lines the midgut lumen. Baculoviruses also encode a family of metalloproteases associated with the OB or are incorporated into the envelope of the occluded virion referred as “viral enhancing factor” or “enhancins.” Enhancins increase the oral infectivity of baculoviruses (2- to 15-fold).
Baculoviruses infecting Lepidoptera encode an enzyme referred to as ecdysteroid UDP-glucosyltransferase (EGT). EGT catalyzes the transfer of glucose from UDP glucose to ecdysone, thus inactivating the hormone and blocking the molting process from one larval instar to the next. It blocks the molting process and extends the life span of a baculovirus-infected larva. The development of recombinant baculoviruses with the EGT gene under the control of an inducible promoter allows production of more OB in insects. A gene encoding a protein tyrosine phosphatase has been implicated in the hyperactivity and wandering behavior of infected lepidopteran larvae. Chitinase genes are found in almost all baculoviruses infecting lepidopteran insects (Macedo et al. 2015). Chitinase is responsible for the digestion of chitin which is the major component of insect exoskeleton. A virus-encoded protease, cathepsin, is expressed late in baculovirus infection. The enzyme protease aids in the breakdown of host cellular structure and eventually the integrity of the infected cadaver, thus maximizing baculovirus OB dispersion. Since CaV channels are not highly conserved in insects, this makes them attractive alternatives and represents a novel mode of action to conventional pesticides. Fusion protein technology, in which insecticidal peptides are linked to a plant lectin “carrier” protein, developed to allow proteins such as spider venom toxins to act as orally delivered biopesticides. ω-Hexatoxin-Hv1a (Hv1a) from the Australian funnel web spider Hadronyche versuta acts on CaV channels in the insect central nervous system (CNS), causing paralysis. Fusion of this insecticidal molecule to the carrier protein snowdrop lectin (Galanthus nivalis agglutinin, GNA) allows Hv1a to traverse the insect gut epithelium and access its sites of action, producing an orally active insecticidal protein. The Hv1a/GNA fusion protein has oral insecticidal activity against insects from a range of orders, including Lepidoptera, Coleoptera, Diptera and Hemiptera (Macedo et al. 2015).
The baculoviruses are classified into two genera, nucleopolyhedroviruses (NPVs) and granuloviruses (GVs) Erayya et al. (2013). Nuclear polyhedrosis viruses include Helicoverpa armigera, Amsacta moorei, Agrotis ipsilon, A. segetum, Anadividia peponis, Trichoplusia orichalcea, Adisura atkinsoni, Plutella xylostella, Corcyra cephalonica, Mythimna separata and Phthorimaea operculella.
The first viral insecticide Elcar™ that consists of a preparation of Heliothis zea is relatively broad range NPV baculovirus and infects many species belonging to genera Helicoverpa and Heliothis. HzSNPV is a product of choice for biocontrol of Helicoverpa armigera. Another baculovirus, HaSNPV, identical to HzSNPV was registered in China as a pesticide. HaNPV has relatively broad host spectrum and potentially used on a variety of crops infested with pests including Spodoptera and Helicoverpa. Another baculovirus, HaSNPV, has been used for large-scale biopesticide production. It has been extensively used on cotton fields. HzSNPV provides control of cotton bollworm and other pests attacking crops such a soybean, sorghum, maize, tomato, and beans. GV is the active component of a number of biopesticides used for protection of apple and pear orchards against the codling moth, Cydia pomonella. GV-based products are available in the trade names of Granusal™ in Germany, Carpovirusine™ in France, Madex™ and Granupom™ in Switzerland, and Virin-CyAP in Russia. Autographa californica and Anagrapha falcifera NPVs have a relatively broad host spectrum and potentially used on a variety of crops infested with pests belonging to a number of genera, including Spodoptera and Helicoverpa (Ranga Rao et al. 2015). Baculovirus Anticarsia gemmatalis, a nucleopolyhedrovirus (AgMNPV), is used to control the velvetbean caterpillar in soybean. Two commercial preparations of Spodoptera NPV are available in the USA and Europe. Two NPVs have a relatively broad host spectrum and used on a variety of crops infested with pests belonging to a number of genera, including Spodoptera and Helicoverpa. These include SPOD-X™ containing Spodoptera exigua NPV to control insects on vegetable crops and Spodopterin™ containing Spodoptera littoralis NPV which protect cotton, corn, and tomatoes (Mazid et al. 2011b).
10.6.1.2 Insects
Trichogramma are minute wasps which are exclusively egg parasites. They lay eggs in the eggs of various lepidopteran pests. After hatching, the Trichogramma larvae feed on and destroy the host egg. It is effective against lepidopteran pests like the sugarcane internode borer, pink bollworm, spotted bollworms in cotton, and stem borers in rice. They are also used against vegetable and fruit pests. It kills the pest in the egg stage, ensuring that the parasite is destroyed before preventing damage to the crop. Control of sugarcane borers and rots has been reported by Trichogramma. Ladybugs and praying mantis have been successful in combating scale insects or aphids which feed on plant sap. Control of mango hoppers and mealy bugs and coffee pod borer is reported by Beauveria. Entomophthora ignobilis (a fungus) is effective against green peach aphid of potato (Myzus persicae) (Macedo et al. 2015).
10.6.1.3 Plant-Based Pesticides
Pesticides obtained from plants mainly include (1) azadirachtin (Azadirachta indica), (2) rotenones obtained from the roots of Derris elliptica and Lonchocarpus nicou, (3) nicotine, (4) pyrethrum (Chrysanthemum cinerariifolium, C. coccineum, and C. marshallii), and (5) thurioside. Neem products have been effective in controlling a large number of insects which include 350 species of arthropods, 12 species of nematodes, 15 species of fungi, three viruses, two species of snails, and one crustacean species. Neem biopesticides are systemic in nature and provide long-term protection to plants against pests. Azadirachtin, a tetranortriterpenoid, is a major active ingredient isolated from neem and is known to disrupt the metamorphosis of insects. Two tetracyclic triterpenoids, meliantetyraolenone and odoratone, isolated from neem also exhibit insecticidal activity against Anopheles stephensi. Neem seed kernel extract (NSKE) has also been found most effective in reducing the larval population of Helicoverpa armigera in chickpea. Neem formulations also have a significant effect against eggs of peach fruit fly Bactrocera zonata (Saunders). Root extracts of Tagetes or Asparagus exhibit nematicidal properties, while Chenopodium and Bougainvillea act as antivirus agents (Isman 2000).
10.7 Biochemical Compounds
These are naturally occurring substances that control pests by nontoxic mechanisms. These include substances such as insect sex pheromones that interfere with mating, as well as plant extracts that attract insect pests to traps. Pheromones are chemicals emitted by living organisms used to send messages to individuals of the opposite sex of the same species. These include plant growth regulators or substances that repel or attract pests and interfere with growth or mating. These have been found effective against rice cutworm, tobacco caterpillar, rice green leaf hopper and several species of aphids and mites. Mating disruption has been successful in controlling a number of insect pests (Mazid et al. 2011b).
Recombinant fusion proteins containing neuroactive peptides/proteins linked to a “carrier” protein can act as effective pest controls. The non-peptidic analog can be used in the development of novel insecticides overcoming the bioavailability of peptides penetrating the insect cuticle or gut mucosa. Hv1a/GNA (Galanthus nivalis agglutinin), containing an insect-specific spider venom Ca channel blocker (ω-hexatoxin-Hv1a) linked to snowdrop lectin (GNA) a “carrier,” is an effective oral biopesticide toward various insect pests. Internalized Hv1a/GNA reach the brain within 1 h of exposure. It is unlikely to cause detrimental effects on honeybees, indicating that atracotoxins targeting Ca channels are potential alternatives to conventional pesticides. Pseudophomins A and B produced by Pseudomonas fluorescens strain BRG100 are found to be effective as herbicide and pesticide. Pseudophomin A acts as a bioherbicide, while pseudophomin B is an antifungal compound (Pedras et al. 2003).
10.8 Commercially Available Biopesticides
The success stories of application of biopesticides have been reported all over the world. Some of the commercially available biopesticides include BioNEEM, Azatin XL, Nema-Q and Biomite. BioNEEM is a broad-spectrum biocide isolated from kernel of neem seeds. The main component is Azadirachtin, a water-soluble emulsifiable concentrate that provides the most effective control of major pests of agricultural and plantation crops. It possesses broad specificity against red spiders and insect pests like helopeltis, aphids, jassids, thrips and caterpillars, etc. The active ingredient inhibits sensory receptors of mouth parts, resulting in disorientation of normal probing, feeding and intake of food by insects and mites. It has very strong repellent and deterrent effects which prevent the insects and mites from colonizing the treated plants.
The successful utilization of biopesticides and biocontrol agents in agriculture includes:
Use of Bacillus thuringiensis for control of diamondback moth and Helicoverpa on cotton, pigeon pea, and tomato
Use of Beauveria for control of mango hoppers, mealy bugs, and coffee pod borer
Use of neem products for control of white fly on cotton
Use of nuclear polyhedrosis virus (NPV) for control of Helicoverpa on gram
Use of Trichogramma for control of sugarcane borers
Use of Trichoderma-based products for control of rots and wilts in various crops (Kalra and Khanuja 2007)
10.9 Molecular Approaches
Several biotechnological and molecular approaches have been followed to enhance the capacity of microbes to achieve maximum pest control properties. These include the following.
10.9.1 Plant-Incorporated Protectants (PIPs)
The genetic modification of plants by expressing genes encoding insecticidal toxins, namely, δ-endotoxins, derived from the soil bacterium Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt plants). Bt endotoxins prove lethal to the alkaline environment of the insect gut. These proteins have provided protection against major pests of cotton, tobacco, tomato, potato, corn, maize and rice. More than 60 Cry proteins have been identified. Most Bt maize hybrids express the Cry1Ab, Cry1Ac, Cry9C and Cry3Bb1 protein targeted against the European corn borer (Ostrinia nubilalis) and corn rootworm complex (Diabrotica spp.), a major pest of maize in North America and Europe. Maize hybrids express the Cry3Bb1 protein, which is targeted against the corn rootworm complex (Diabrotica spp.) (Coleoptera), also a major pest of maize, especially in North America. Cotton expressing the Cry1Ac protein is targeted against the cotton bollworm (Helicoverpa zea Boddie) (Lepidoptera), which is a major pest of cotton; potato expressing the Cry3A or Cry3C is targeted against the Colorado potato beetle (Leptinotarsa decemlineata Say) (Coleoptera), which is a major pest of potato; and Cry4 proteins are targeted against some Diptera, such as certain flies (e.g., Lycoriella castanescens Lengersdorf) and mosquitoes (e.g., Culex pipiens L.). The expression of these toxins confers protection against insect crop destruction. Potato expressing the Cry3A or Cry3C is targeted against the Colorado potato beetle (Leptinotarsa decemlineata Say) (Coleoptera), which is a major pest of potato; and Cry4 proteins are targeted against some Diptera, such as certain flies ( Lycoriella castanescens) and mosquitoes (e.g., Culex pipiens L.) (Saxena et al. 2010).
10.9.2 Other Proteins and Peptides
Macrocidins and P. macrostoma enter weed tissues via locations adjacent to root hairs, colonizing intercellularly the vascular trachea, thereby interfering with tissue functionality. P. macrostoma also colonizes resistant plants and only in the outer layers of the root. There are two major groups of macrocidins: macrocidin A (Graupner et al. 2003) and macrocidin Z (Bailey et al. 2011). P. macrostoma could provide a valuable alternative to control weeds with resistance to carotenoid biosynthesis targeting synthetic herbicides.
The antimicrobial peptides are synthesized as two distinct systems: (1) non-ribosomal peptide synthesis, e.g., cyclic lipopeptides, iturin, and fengycin families, and (2) ribosomal peptide synthesis, which is further subdivided into (a) posttranslationally modified, e.g., subtilisin; (b) non-modified, e.g., thurincins; and (c) large heat-labile proteins. Peptide synthetases constitute the non-ribosomal biosynthetic machinery that produces a diverse array of lipopeptides (LPs), such as iturin, fengycin and surfactin families. The LPs are amphiphilic and have cell wall and membrane surface active properties, facilitating the formation of pores in membranes of phytopathogenic bacteria and fungi. Loss of cell membrane integrity causes a disruption in active transport (i.e., nutrient and ion transport) leading to cell death. Surfactins have antibacterial activity, while iturins and fengycins have antifungal properties. Optimum biocontrol activity and colonization of the rhizosphere by B. subtilis require coordinated production and synergy of complementary LPs. Surfactin is a signal molecule in the quorum-sensing (QS) system in B. subtilis. Surfactin may be involved in initiating biofilm development by subpopulations of the colony and detection of microbial community diversity in the rhizosphere. QS molecules elicit regulation of genes required for microbial survival and act as microbial interspecies communication signals. Subtilisin exhibits broad-spectrum activity toward Gram-positive bacteria by disrupting membrane function.
10.10 Conclusions
Biopesticides and biofertilizers form an important component of integrated pest management (IPM). Biofertilizers increase soil fertility and sustainability by mobilizing macro- and micronutrients or by converting insoluble form to soluble forms available to plants. They stimulate root growth and produce phytohormones that change the root physiology to increase nutrient and water uptake. The advantages such as easy biodegradability and less pesticide residues resulting in less pollution make them a sustainable, environmentally safe pest control agent (Copping and Menn 2000). More research needs to be carried out to overcome the limitations such as narrow target range, specific mode of action, shorter shelf life and limited field persistence and achieve maximum benefit from microbes. Molecular techniques can help in development of modified insecticides which possess enhanced activity against a wide range of pathogens and diseases.
References
Abdelgani ME, Osman AG, Mohamed SS (2003) Restoring soil fertility of desertified through biological nitrogen fixation. In: Sharhan A, Wood WW, Goudie AS, Fowler A, Abdellatiff EM (eds) Desertification in the third millennium. Balkima Publishers, Lisse, pp 335–338
Adesemoye AO, Torbert HA, Kloepper JW (2009) Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria allow reduced application rates of chemical fertilizers. Microb Ecol 58:921–929
Aravind R, Kumar A, Eapen SJ, Ramana KV (2009) Endophytic bacterial flora in root and stem tissues of black pepper (Piper nigrum L.) genotype: isolation, identification and evaluation against Phytophthora capsici. Lett Appl Microbiol 48:58–64
Aroca R, Ruiz-Lozano JM, Zamarreno AM, Paz JA, García-Mina JM, Pozo MJ, Lopez-Raez JA (2013) Arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis influences strigolactone production under salinity and alleviates salt stress in lettuce plants. J Plant Physiol 170:47–55
Arun KS (2007) Bio-fertilizers for sustainable agriculture. Mechanism of P-solubilization, 6th edn. Agribios Publishers, Jodhpur, pp 196–197
Askary M, Mostajeran A, Amooaghaei R, Mostajeran M (2009) Influence of the co-inoculation Azospirillum brasilense and Rhizobium meliloti plus 2,4-D on grain yield and N, P, K content of Triticum aestivum (cv. Baccros and Mahdavi). Am Eurasian J Agric Environ Sci 5:296–307
Bailey KL, Pitt WM, Leggett F, Sheedy C, Derby J (2011) Determining the infection process of Phoma macrostoma that leads to bioherbicidal activity on broad leaved weeds. Biol Control 59:268–276
Bhardwaj D, Ansari MW, Sahoo RK, Tuteja N (2014) Biofertilizers function as key player in sustainable agriculture by improving soil fertility, plant tolerance and crop productivity. Microb Cell Fact 13:66
Bhuvaneshwari K, Kumar A (2013) Agronomic potential of the association Azolla-Anabaena. Sci Res Reporter 3(1):78–82
Caballero-Mellado J, Carcaño-Montiel MG, Mascarúa-Esparza MA (1992) Field inoculation of wheat (Triticum aestivum) with Azospirillum brasilense under temperate climate. Symbiosis 13:243–253
Çakmakçı R, Dönmez F, Aydın A, Şahin F (2006) Growth promotion of plants by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria under greenhouse and two different field soil conditions. Soil Biol Biochem 38:1482–1487
Carrapico F, Teixeira G, Diniz MA (2000) Azolla as a biofertiliser in Africa: a challenge for the future. Revesta Cincies Agraries 23:120–138
Chen JH (2006) The combined use of chemical and organic fertilizers and/or biofertiliser for crop growth and soil fertility. International workshop on sustained management of the soil-rhizosphere system for efficient crop production and fertilizer. Land Development Department, Bangkok
Chianu JN, Nkonya EM, Mairura FS, Akinnifesi FK (2011) Biological nitrogen fixation and socioeconomic factors for legume production in sub-Saharan Africa: a review. Agron Sustain Dev 31:139–154
Copping LG, Menn Julius J (2000) Biopesticides: a review of their action, applications and efficacy. Pest Manag Sci 56:651–676
Das K, Dang R (2010) Influence of biofertilizers on stevioside content in Stevia rebaudiana grown in acidic soil condition. Arch Appl Sci Res 2:44–49
Deepak B, Wahid AM, Sahoo RK, Tuteja N (2014) Biofertilizers function as key player in sustainable agriculture by improving soil fertility, plant tolerance and crop productivity. Microb Cell Factories 13:66
Dhanasekar R, Dhandapani R (2012) Effect of biofertilizers on the growth of Helianthus annuus. Int J Plant Animal Environ Sci 2:143–147
Erayya JJ, Sajeesh PK, Upadhyay V (2013) Nuclear polyhedrosis virus (NPV), a potential biopesticide: a review. Res J Agric For Sci 1:30–33
Gao X, Lu X, Wu M, Zhang H, Pan R, Tian J, Li S, Liao H (2012) Co-Inoculation with Rhizobia and AMF inhibited soybean red crown rot: from field study to plant defense-related gene expression analysis. PLoS ONE 7:e33977
Gharib FA, Moussa LA, Massoud ON (2008) Effect of compost and bio-fertilizers on growth, yield and essential oil of sweet marjoram (Majorana hortensis) plant. Int J Agric Biol 10:381–387
Gholami A, Shahsavani S, Nezarat S (2009) The effect of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) on germination seedling growth and yield of maize. Int J Biol Life Sci 5:1
Ghouse P, Peera SK, Balasubramaniam P, Tajuddin A (2015) Effect of silicate solubilizing bacteria and fly ash on mean leaf erectness of rice (Oryza sativa.) in low, medium and high silicon soils. Int J Appl Biol Pharm Technol 6:133–135
Graupner PR, Carr A, Clancy E, Gilbert J, Bailey KL, Derby JA, Gerwick BC (2003) The macrocidins: novel cyclic tetramic acids with herbicidal activity produced by Phoma macrostoma. J Nat Prod 66:1558–1561
Gupta S, Dikshit AK (2010) Biopesticides: an eco-friendly approach for pest control. J Biopesticides 3:186–188
Gupta A, Sen S (2013) Role of biofertilizers and biopesticides for sustainable agriculture. scholar.google.com
Hubbard M, Hynes RK, Erlandson M, Bailey KL (2014) The biochemistry behind biopesticide efficacy. Sustain Chem Proc 2:18
Hungria M, Campo RJ, Souza EM, Pedrosa FO (2010) Inoculation with selected strains of Azospirillum brasilense and A. lipoferum improves yields of maize and wheat in Brazil. Plant Soil 331:413–425
Hussain N, Mujeeb F, Tahir M, Khan GD, Hassan NM, Bari A (2002) Effectiveness of Rhizobium under salinity stress. Asian J Plant Sci 1:12–14
Ilyas N, Bano A, Iqbal S, Raja NI (2012) Physiological, biochemical and molecular characterization of Azospirillum spp. isolated from maize under water stress. Pak J Bot 44:71–80
Isman MB (2000) Plant essential oils for pest and disease management. Crop Prot 19:603–608
Jetiyanon K, Pliabanchang P (2011) Potential of Bacillus cereus strain RS87 for partial replacement of chemical fertilizers in the production of Thai rice cultivars. J Sci Food Agric 92(5):1080–1085
Jilani G, Akram A, Ali RM, Hafeez FY, Shamsi IH, Chaudhry AN, Chaudhry AG (2007) Enhancing crop growth, nutrients availability, economics and beneficial rhizosphere microflora through organic and biofertilizers. Ann Microbiol 57(2):177–184
Joe MM, Jaleel CA, Sivakumar PK, Zhao CX, Karthikeyan B (2009) Co-aggregation in Azospirillum brasilensense MTCC-125 with other PGPR strains: effect of physical and chemical factors and stress endurance ability. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 40:491–499
Kalaiselvi P, Anthoniraj S (2009) In vitro solubilization of silica and potassium from silicate minerals by silicate solubilizing bacteria. J Ecobiol 24:159–168
Kalra A, Khanuja SPS (2007) Research and development priorities for biopesticide and biofertiliser products for sustainable agriculture in India. In: Teng PS (ed) Business potential for agricultural biotechnology. Asian Productivity Organisation, Tokyo, pp 96–102
Karpagam T, Nagalakshmi PK (2014) Isolation and characterization of phosphate solubilizing microbes from agricultural soil. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci 3(3):601–614
Kawalekar JS (2013) Role of biofertilisers and biopesticides for sustainable agriculture. J Bio Innov 2(3):73–78
Khan TA, Naeem A (2011) An alternate high yielding inexpensive procedure for the purification of concanavalin A. Biol Med 3(2):250–259
Khan TA, Mazid M, Mohammad F (2011a) Ascorbic acid: an enigmatic molecule to developmental and environmental stress in plant. Int J Appl Biol Pharm Technol 2(33):468–483
Khan TA, Mazid M, Mohammad F (2011b) Sulphur management: an agronomic and transgenic approach. J Indus Res Technol 1(2):147–161
Khan TA, Mazid M, Mohammad F (2011c) Role of ascorbic acid against pathogenesis in plants. J Stress Physiol Biochem 7(3):222–234
Khan TA, Amani S, Naeem A (2012a) Glycation promotes the formation of genotoxic aggregates in glucose oxidase. Amino Acids 43(3):1311–1322
Khan TA, Mazid M, Ansari SA, Azam A, Naeem A (2012b) Zinc oxide nanoparticles promote the aggregation of concanavalin A. Int J Peptide Res Therapeutics 19:135–146
Kohler J, Caravaca F (2010) An AM fungus and a PGPR intensify the adverse effects of salinity on the stability of rhizosphere soil aggregates of Lactuca sativa Roldan. Soil Biol Biochem 42:429–434
Macedo MLR, Oliveira CFR, Oliveira CT (2015) Review insecticidal activity of plant lectins and potential application in crop protection. Molecules 20:2014–2033
Majengo CO, Okalebo JR, Lesueur D, Pypers P, Ngétich W, Mutegi E, Mburu MW, Musyoki M (2011) Interaction between nitrogen and phosphorus microbial inoculants on soybean production in Bungoma, Kenya. Afr Crop Sci Conf Proc 10:121–123
Mazid M, Khan TA (2014) Future of bio-fertilizers in Indian agriculture: an overview. Int J Agric Food Res 3:10–23
Mazid M, Khan TA, Mohammad F (2011a) Potential of NO and H2O2 as signaling molecules in tolerance to abiotic stress in plants. J Indus Res Technol 1(1):56–68
Mazid S, Rajkhowa RC, Kalita JC (2011b) A review on the use of biopesticides in insect pest management. Int J Sci Adv Technol 1:169–178
Mazid M, Khan TA, Mohammad F (2011c) Role of Nitric oxide in regulation of H2O2 mediating tolerance of plants to abiotic stress: a synergistic signaling approach. J Stress Physiol Biochem 7(2):34–74
Mazid M, Khan TA, Mohammad F (2011d) Response of crop plants under sulphur stress tolerance: a holistic approach. J Stress Physiol Biochem 7(3):23–57
Mazid M, Khan TA, Mohammad F (2012a) Role of nitrate reductase in nitrogen fixation under photosynthetic regulation. World J Pharm Res 1(3):386–414
Mazid M, Khan TA, Mohammad F (2012b) Role of NO in H2O2 regulating responses against temperature and ultraviolet induced oxidative stress in plants. Acta Bio Indica 1(1):1–16
Mishra DJ, Singh R, Mishra UK, Kumar SS (2013) Role of bio-fertilizer in organic agriculture: a review. Res J Recent Sci 2:39–41
Mohammadi K, Sohrabi Y (2012) Bacterial biofertilizers for sustainable crop production: a review. J Agric Biol Sci 7:307–316
Mondal T, Datta JK, Mondal NK (2015) Chemical fertilizer in conjunction with biofertilizer and vermicompost induced changes in morpho-physiological and bio-chemical traits of mustard crop. J Saudi Soc Agric Sci, DOI: dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jssas.2015.05.001
Moreno-Sarmiento N, Moreno-Rodriguez LF, Uribe D (2007) Biofertilizantes para la agricultura en Colombia. In: Izaguirre-Mayoral ML, Izaguirre-Mayoral ML, Labandera C, Sanjuan J (eds) Biofertilizantes en Iberoamerica: Visionté cnica, científica y empresarial, vol 1. Denad Internacional, Montevideo, pp 38–45
Molina-Favero C, Mónica Creus C, Luciana Lanteri M, Correa-Aragunde N, Lombardo MC, Barassi AC, Lamattina L (2007) Nitric oxide and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria: common features influencing root growth and development. Adv Bot Res 46:1–33
Naderifar M, Daneshian J (2012) Effect of different nitrogen and biofertilizers effect on growth and yield of Brassica napus L. Int J Agric Crop Sci 4(8):478–482
Nargund VB, Amaresh YS, Sreenivas AG, Nadagouda S (2007) Trichoderma harzianum–a potential bioagent for seed and soil borne diseases management in Upper Krishna project command area of Karnataka, India. Int J Agric Sci 3:158–160
Naseriad H, Soleymanifard A, Naseri R (2011) Effect of integrated application of biofertilizers on grain yield, yield components and associated traits of maize cultivars. Am Eurasian J Agric Environ Sci 10(2):271–277
Nguyen VS (2006) The Production and Application of Bio-fertilizers in Vietnam. In: Proceedings of International Workshop on Sustained Management of the Soil Rhizosphere System for Efficient Crop Production and Fertilizer Use, Held 16–20 October, Thailand
Nicolas MF, Hungria M, Arias CAA (2006) Identification of quantitative trait loci controlling nodulation and shoot mass in progenies from two Brazilian soybean cultivars. Field Crop Res 95:355–366
Olivares J, Bedmar EJ, Sanjuan J (2013) Biological nitrogen fixation in the context of global change. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 26(5):486–494
Ozturk A, Caglar O, Sahin F (2003) Yield response of wheat and barley to inoculation of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria at various levels of nitrogen fertilization. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 166:262–266
Patel N, Patel Y, Mankad A (2014) Bio Fertilizer: a promising tool for sustainable farming. Int J Innov Res Sci Eng Technol 3:15, 838–15, 842
Pedras MSC, Ismail N, Quail JW, Boyetchko SM (2003) Structure, chemistry, and biological activity of pseudophomins A and B, new cyclic lipodepsipeptides isolated from the biocontrol bacterium Pseudomonas fluorescens. Phytochemistry 62:1105–1114
Raghuwanshi R (2012) Opportunities and challenges to sustainable agriculture in India. NEBIO 3:78–86
Raja N (2013) Biopesticides and biofertilizers: ecofriendly sources for sustainable agriculture. J Biofert Biopest 112:1000e112
Rajasekaran S, Sundaramoorthy P (2010) Response of organic manures and biofertilizer on germination, growth and yield of selected leguminous corps. J Ecotoxicol Environ Monit 20:161–168
Ramachandran VK, East AK, Karunakaran R, Downie JA, Poole SP (2011) Adaptation of Rhizobium leguminosarum to pea, alfalfa and sugar beet rhizosphere investigated by comparative transcriptomics. Genome Biol 12:106–109
Ranga Rao GV, Kumar CS, Sireesha K, Lava Kumar P, (2015) Chapter 2 Role of nucleopolyhedroviruses (NPVs) in the management of lepidopteran pests in Asia. In: Sree KS, Varma A (eds) Biocontrol of Lepidopteran pests, Soil Biology 43. Springer Int Publishing, Cham
Rao MS, Rajappa U, Chakravarthy AK, Grace GN, Kamalnath M, Prabu P (2015) A frontier area of research on liquid biopesticides: the way forward for sustainable agriculture in India. Curr Sci 108:1590–1592
Roberts NJ, Morieri G, Kalsi G, Rose A, Stiller J, Edwards A, Xie F, Gresshoff PM, Oldroyd GE, Downie JA, Etzler ME (2013) Rhizobial and mycorrhizal symbioses in Lotus japonicus require lectin nucleotide phosphohydrolase, which acts upstream of calcium signaling. Plant Physiol 161:556–567
Romero D, De Vicente A, Rakotoaly RH, Dufour SE, Veening JW, Arrebola E, Cazorla FM, Kuipers OP, Paquot M, Pérez-García A (2007) The iturin and fengycin families of lipopeptides are key factors in antagonism of Bacillus subtilis toward Podosphaera fusca. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 20:430–440
Roychowdhury D, Paul M, Banerjee SK (2015) Isolation identification and characterization of phosphate solubilising bacteria from soil and the production of biofertilizer. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci 4(11):808–815
Şahin F, Çakmakçı R, Kantar F (2004) Sugar beet and barley yields in relation to inoculation with N2-fixing and phosphate solubilizing bacteria. Plant Soil 265:123–129
Sahoo RK, Ansari MW, Dangar TK, Mohanty S, Tuteja N (2013a) Phenotypic and molecular characterization of efficient nitrogen fixing Azotobacter strains of the rice fields. Protoplasma 251(3):511–523
Sahoo RK, Bhardwaj D, Tuteja N (2013b) Biofertilizers: a sustainable eco-friendly agricultural approach to crop improvement. In: Tuteja N, Gill SS (eds) Plant acclimation to environmental stress. Springer, New York, pp 403–432
Sahu D, Priyadarshanil I, Rath B (2012) Cyanobacteria – as a potential biofertilizer. CIB Tech J Microbiol 1:20–26
Saikia SP, Bora D, Goswami A, Mudoi KD, Gogoi A (2013) A review on the role of Azospirillum in the yield improvement of non leguminous crops. Afr J Microbiol Res 6:1085–1102
Santi C, Bogusz D, Franche C (2013) Biological nitrogen fixation in non-legume plants. Ann Bot 111:743–767
Saxena D, Pushalkar S, Stotzky G (2010) Fate and effects in soil of cry proteins from Bacillus thuringiensis: influence of physicochemical and biological characteristics of soil. The Open Toxicol J 3:133–153
Seiber JN, Coats J, Duke SO, Aaron D (2014) Gross biopesticides: state of the art and future opportunities. J Agric Food Chem 62:11613–11619
Shaheen AM, Rizk FA, Singer SM (2007) Growing Onion Plants Without Chemical Fertilization. Res J Agric Biol Sci 3(2):95–104
Sharma P, Sardana V, Kandola SS (2011) Response of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) to Rhizobium inoculation. Libyan Agric Res Centre J Int 2:101–104
Sheng XF, Zhao F, He LY, Qiu G, Chen L (2008) Isolation and characterization of silicate mineral-solubilizing Bacillus globisporus Q12 from the surfaces of weathered feldspar. Can J Microbiol 54(12):1064–1068
Shukla R, Shukla A (2012) Market potential for biopesticides: a green product for agricultural applications. Int J Manag Res Rev 2:91–99
Singh RS, Prasad K (2011) Effect of bio-fertilizers on growth and productivity of wheat (Triticum aestivum). J Farm Sci 1(1):1–8
Singh S, Singh BK, Yadav SM, Gupta AK (2014) Potential of biofertilizers in crop production in Indian agriculture. Am J Plant Nutr Fert Technol 4:33–40
Smith S, Lakobsen I, Gronlund M, Smith FA (2011) Roles of arbuscular mycorrhizas in plant phosphorus nutrition: interactions between pathways of phosphorus uptake in arbuscular mycorrhizal roots have important implications for understanding and manipulating plant phosphorus acquisition. Plant Physiol 156:1050–1057
Thakore Y (2004) The biopesticide market for global agricultural use. Indus Biotechnol Fall 2006:194–208
Valadabadi SA, Farahani HA (2011) Investigations of Biofertilizers Influence on Quantity and Quality Characteristics in Nigella sativa L. J Hortic Forestry 3(3):88–92
Wani SA, Chand S, Ali T (2013) Potential use of Azotobacter chroococcum in crop production: an overview. Curr Agric Res J 1:35–38
Woomer PL, Huising J, Giller KE (2014) N2Africa final report of the first phase 2009–2013, p 138
Yadav RK, Abraham G, Singh YV, Singh PK (2014) Advancements in the utilization of Azolla-Anabaena system in relation to sustainable agricultural practices. Proc Indian Natl Sci Acad 80:301–316
Yang JW, Kloepper JW, Ryu CM (2009) Rhizosphere bacteria help plants tolerate abiotic stress. Trends Plant Sci 14:1–4
Yasari E, Patwardhan AM (2007) Effects of (Azotobacter and Azospirillum) inoculants and chemical fertilizers on growth and productivity of canola (Brassica napus L.). Asian J Plant Sci, Asian Network for Scientific Information 6(1):77–82
Yao L, Wu Z, Zheng Y, Kaleem I, Li C (2010) Growth promotion and protection against salt stress by Pseudomonas putida Rs-198 on cotton. Eur J Soil Biol 46:49–54
Yosefi K, Galavi M, Ramrodi M, Mousavi SR (2011) Effect of bio-phosphate and chemical phosphorus fertilizer accompanied with micronutrient foliar application on growth, yield and yield components of maize. Aust J Crop Sci 5(2):175–180
Youssef MMA, Eissa MFM (2014) Biofertilizers and their role in management of plant parasitic nematodes. A review. E3. J Biotechnol Pharm Res 5:1–6
Zaki MF, Abdelhafez AAM, El-Dewiny CY (2010) Influence of applying phosphate biofertilizers and different levels of phosphorus sources on the productivity, quality and chemical composition of sweet fennel (Foeniculum vulgare Mill.). Aust J Basic Appl Sci 4(2):334–347
Zhang X, Candas M, Griko NB, Taussig R, Bulla LA Jr (2006) A mechanism of cell death involving an adenylyl cyclase/PKA signaling pathway is induced by the Cry1Ab toxin of Bacillus thuringiensis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:9897–9902
Zhang N, Kai W, He X, Li S, Zhang Z, Shen B, Yang X, Zhang R, Huang Q, Shen Q (2011) A new bioorganic fertilizer can effectively control banana wilt by strong colonization with Bacillus subtilis N11. Plant Soil 344:87–97
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dhir, B. (2017). Biofertilizers and Biopesticides: Eco-friendly Biological Agents. In: Kumar, R., Sharma, A., Ahluwalia, S. (eds) Advances in Environmental Biotechnology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4041-2_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4041-2_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-4040-5
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-4041-2
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)