Skip to main content

Performance of Microfinance Institutions: A Review∗

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Production Economics

Abstract

This review covers current issues that applied researchers assessing the performance of MFIs are likely to encounter and should be cognizant of.

We would like to thank Erika Schutt Pardo for comments on an earlier version of this chapter. All errors are ours alone.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Nonparametric methods can also be deployed.

  2. 2.

    Prominent examples include [21, 66, 75, 86].

  3. 3.

    Almost no studies of MFI efficiency collect data by hand from MFIs. Hartarska [64] is one example that looks at performance of MFIs based on governance where the data is hand collected.

  4. 4.

    This is true for earlier versions; in later years of data collection as more MFIs understood that reporting to MIX is a good way to attract investors and soft credits and grants, it has become less so.

  5. 5.

    https://cersem.uia.no/dataset/

  6. 6.

    https://www.european-microfinance.org/

  7. 7.

    We note that the Diamond data are no longer available via the world bank MIX Market database.

  8. 8.

    Hartarska et al. [68] use the number of clients (borrowers and savers) which equals the number of borrowers in lending-only MFIs but captures better the output of savings-and-loans MFIs.

  9. 9.

    When one includes quasi fixed inputs, e, then \(RTS=\frac {1-\partial \ln \mathcal {C}/\partial \ln \boldsymbol {e}}{\sum \limits ^M_{m=1}\frac {\partial \ln \mathcal {C}}{\partial \ln y_m}}\).

  10. 10.

    This is not to say that subsidization does not exist however; [40] find that subsidies are still pervasive in the industry, representing on average 13 cents per dollar lent across all MFIs.

References

  1. Agier I, Szafarz A (2013) Microfinance and gender: is there a glass ceiling on loan size? World Dev 42:165–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ahlin C, Lin J, Maio M (2011) Where does microfinance flourish? Microfinance institution performance in macroeconomic context. J Dev Econ 95(2):105–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Aigner DJ, Lovell CAK, Schmidt P (1977) Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production functions. J Econ 6(1):21–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Akram S, Routray JK (2013) Investigating causal relationship between social capital and microfinance: implications for rural development. Int J Soc Econ 40:760–776

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Al-Azzam M (2019) Financing microfinance institutions: subsidies or deposit mobilisation. Appl Econ 51(15):1621–1633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Al-Azzam M, Parmeter CF (2019) Competition and microcredit interest rates: international evidence. Empir Econ. Forthcoming

    Google Scholar 

  7. Alvarez A, Amsler C, Orea L, Schmidt P (2006) Interpreting and testing the scaling property in models where inefficiency depends on firm characteristics. J Prod Anal 25(2):201–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Amersdorffer F, Buchenrieder G, Bokusheva R, Wolz A (2015) Efficiency in microfinance: financial and social performance of agricultural credit cooperatives in Bulgaria. J Oper Res Soc 66(1):57–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Armendáriz B (2011) Women and microsavings. In: Armendariz B, Labie M (eds) World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte Ltd. Singapore, pp 503–515

    Google Scholar 

  10. Armendáriz B, Szafarz A (2011) On mission drift in microfinance institutions. In: Armendariz B, Labie M (eds) World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte Ltd. Singapore, pp 341–366

    Google Scholar 

  11. Armendariz de Aghion B, Morduch J (2007) The economics of microfinance. MIT Press

    Google Scholar 

  12. Arnold LG, Booker B (2013) Good intentions pave the way to ⋯ the local moneylender. Econ Lett 118(3):466–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Arnold LG, Reeder J, Steger S (2013) On the viability of group lending when microfinance meets the market: a reconsideration of the Besley-Coate model. J Emerg Mark Financ 12:59–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Banerjee A, Karlan D, Zinman J (2015) Six randomized evaluations of microcredit: introduction and further steps. Am Econ J Appl Econ 7(1):1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Baquero G, Hamadi M, Heinen A (2018) Competition, loan rates, and information dispersion in nonprofit and for-profit microcredit markets. J Money Credit Bank 50(5):893–937

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Basharat B, Hudon M, Nawaz A (2015) Does efficiency lead to lower prices? A new perspective from microfinance interest rates. Strateg Chang 24(1):49–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bauchet J, Morduch J (2010) Selective knowledge: reporting bias in microfinance data. Perspect Global Dev Technol 9:240–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Baumol WJ, Panzer J, Willig R (1982) Contestable markets and the theory of market structure. Harcourt, New York

    Google Scholar 

  19. Beck T, Behr P, Guettler A (2013) Gender and banking: are women better loan officers? Rev Financ 17:1279–1321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Beisland LA, D’Espallier B, Mersland R (2019) The commercialization of the microfinance industry: is there a ‘personal mission drift’ among credit officers? J Bus Ethics 158:119–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bensalem S, Ellouze A (2019) Profit-orientation and efficiency in microfinance industry: an application of stochastic frontier approach. Inf Syst Oper Res 57(3):411–429

    Google Scholar 

  22. Berger AN, Cummins JD, Weiss MA, Zi H (2000) Conglomeration versus strategic focus: evidence from the insurance industry. J Financ Intermed 9(4):323–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Bibi U, Balli HO, Matthews CD, Tripe DWL (2018) Impact of gender and governance on microfinance efficiency. J Int Financ Mark Inst Money 53:307–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Boehe DM, Cruz L (2013) Gender and microfinance performance: Why does the institutional context matter? World Dev 47:121–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Bogan VL (2012) Capital structure and sustainability: an empirical study of microfinance institutions. Rev Econ Stat 94(4):1045–1058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bond P, Rai AS (2009) Borrower runs. J Dev Econ 88(2):185–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bos J, Millone M (2015) Practice what you preach: microfinance business models and operational efficiency. World Dev 70:28–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Botti F, Crosi M, Zacchia G (2018) A new European microfinance panel data set: The European Microfinance Network survey 2006–2015. EMN Working Paper No.1-June 2018. Available at https://www.european-microfinance.org/

  29. Caudill S, Gropper D, Hartarska V (2009) Which microfinance institutions are becoming more cost-effective with time? Evidence from a mixture model. J Money Credit Bank 41:651–672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Caudill S, Gropper D, Hartarska V (2012) Microfinance institution costs: effects of gender, subsidies and technology. J Financ Econ Policy 4:292–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Christen R, Drake D (2002) Commercialization. The new reality of microfinance. Kumarian Press, Bloomfield, pp 2–22

    Google Scholar 

  32. Christen RP, Lyman TR, Rosenberg R (2003) Microfinance consensus guidelines: guiding principles on regulation and supervision of microfinance. CGAP and World Bank, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  33. Churchill SA (2020) Microfinance financial sustainability and outreach: is there a trade-off? Empir Econ. 59:1329–1350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Collins D, Morduch J, Rutherford S, Ruthven O (2009) Portfolios of the poor: how the World’s poor live on $2 a day. Princeton, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  35. Colombi R, Kumbhakar S, Martini G, Vittadini G (2014) Closed-skew normality in stochastic frontiers with individual effects and long/short-run efficiency. J Prod Anal 42:123–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Cozarenco A, Hartarska V, Szafarz A (2018) Too many cooks spoil the broth: the conflicting impacts of subsidies and deposits on the cost-efficiency of microfinance institutions. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3295173 or https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3295173

  37. Cozarenco A, Hudon M, Szafarz A (2016) What type of microfinance institutions supply savings products? Econ Lett 140:57–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Cull R, Demirgüç-Kunt A, Morduch J (2007) Financial performance and outreach: a global analysis of leading micro banks. Econ J 117:107–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Cull R, Demirgüç-Kunt A, Morduch J (2011) Does regulatory supervision curtail microfinance profitability and outreach? World Dev 39(6):949–965

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Cull R, Demirgüç-Kunt A, Morduch J (2018) The microfinance business model: enduring subsidy and modest profit. World Bank Econ Rev 32(2):221–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Dahal M, Fiala N (2020) What do we know about the impact of microfinance? The problems of statistical power and precision. World Dev 128:104773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Dehejia R, Montgomery H, Morduch J (2012) Do interest rates matter? Credit demand in the Dhaka slums’. J Dev Econ 97(2):437–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Dehem T, Hudon M (2013) Microfinance from the clients’ perspective: an empirical enquiry into transaction costs in urban and rural India. Oxford Dev Stud 41:S117–S132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Delgado M, Parmeter CF, Hartarska V, Mersland R (2015) Should all microfinance institutions mobilize microsavings? Evidence from economies of scope. Empir Econ 48(1):193–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. D’Espallier B, Goedecke J, Hudon M, Mersland R (2017) From NGOs to banks: does institutional transformation alter the business model of microfinance institutions? World Dev 89:19–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. D’Espallier B, Guérin I, Mersland R (2011) Women and repayment in microfinance: a global analysis. World Dev 39:758–772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. D’Espallier B, Hudon M, Szafarz A (2013) Unsubsidized microfinance institutions. Econ Lett 120(2):174–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. D’Espallier B, Hudon M, Szafarz A (2017) Aid volatility and social performance in microfinance. Nonprofit Volunt Sect Q 46(1):116–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Efendic V, Hadziahmetovic N (2017) The social and financial efficiency of microfinance institutions: the case of Bosnia and Herzegovina. South East Eur J Econ Bus 12(2):85–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Emran MS, Morshed AKMM, Stiglitz J (2011) Microfinance and missing markets. MPRA Paper No. 41451

    Google Scholar 

  51. Evans DS, Heckman JJ (1984) A test for subadditivity of the cost function with an application to the Bell system. Am Econ Rev 74(4):615–623

    Google Scholar 

  52. Fall F, Akim A, Wassongma H (2018) DEA and SFA research on the efficiency of microfinance institutions: a meta-analysis. World Dev 107:176–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Fillipini M, Greene WH (2016) Persistent and transient productive inefficiency: a maximum simulated likelihood approach. J Prod Anal 45(2):187–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Flückiger Y, Vassiliev A (2007) Efficiency in microfinance institutions: an application of data envelopment analysis to MFIs in Peru. Palgrave Macmillan, London, pp 89–110

    Google Scholar 

  55. Freixas X, Rochet J (1997) Microeconomis of banking. Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  56. Garmaise MJ, Natividad G (2010) Information, the cost of credit, and operational efficiency: an empirical study of microfinance. Rev Financ Stud 23:2560–2590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Gebremariam HT (2017) Microfinance institutions’ transparency, governance and risk in Sub-Saharan Africa. Unpublished Thesis, Doctor of Philosophy, University of Otago. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10523/7754

  58. Ghosh S, Van Tassel E (2011) Microfinance and competition for external funding. Econ Lett 112(2):168–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Greene WH (2005) Reconsidering heterogeneity in panel data estimators of the stochastic frontier model. J Econ 126(2):269–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Gregoire JR, Tuya OR (2006) Cost efficiency of microfinance institutions in Peru: a stochastic frontier approach. Latin Am Bus Rev 7(2):41–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Gul FA, Podder J, Shahriar AZM (2017) Performance of microfinance institutions: does government ideology matter? World Dev 100:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Gutiérrez-Nieto B, Serrano-Cinca C, Mar M (2007) Microfinance institutions and efficiency. Omega Int J Manag Sci 35:131–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Haq M, Skully M, Pathan S (2010) Efficiency of microfinance institutions: a data envelopment analysis. Asia-Pacific Financ Mark 17(1):63–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Hartarska V (2005) Governance and performance of microfinance institutions in central and eastern Europe and the newly independent stats. World Dev 33:1627–1643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Hartarska V, James N, Mersland R (2009) Scale economies in microfinance. Paper presented at the First European research conference on microfinance, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  66. Hartarska V, Mersland R (2012) What governance mechanisms promote efficiency in reaching poor clients? Evidence from rated MFIs’, Eur Financ Manag 18:218–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Hartarska V, Nadolnyak D (2008) Does rating help microfinance institutions raise funds? Cross-country evidence. Int Rev Econ Financ 17(4):558–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Hartarska V, Nadolnyak D, Mersland R (2014) Are women better bankers for the poor: evidence from rural microfinance institutions? Am J Agric Econ 96:1291–1306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Hartarska V, Nadolnyak D, Shen X (2012) Efficiency in microfinance cooperatives. Iberoam J Dev Stud 1(2):53–74

    Google Scholar 

  70. Hartarska V, Nadolnyak D, Shen X (2013) Cost function approach to MFI efficiency: the role of subsidy and social output measures. In: Ronny Manos J-PG, Yaron J (eds) Innovations in microfinance: case studies from developing countries and countries in transition. New York

    Google Scholar 

  71. Hartarska V, Parmeter CF (2020) Do women make the (MFI’s) world go round? University of Miami Working Paper

    Google Scholar 

  72. Hartarska V, Parmeter CF, Nadolnyak D (2011) Economies of scope of lending and mobilizing deposits in microfinance institutions: a semiparametric analysis. Am J Agric Econ 93(2):389–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Hartarska V, Parmeter CF, Nadolnyak D, Zhu B (2010) Economies of scope for microfinance: differences across output measures. Pac Econ Rev 15:464–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Hartarska V, Shen X, Mersland R (2013) Scale economies and elasticities of substitution in microfinance institutions. J Bank Financ 37:118–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Hassan MK, Tufte DR (2001) The X-efficiency of a group-based lending institution: the case of the Grameen Bank. World Dev 29(6):1071–1082

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Henderson DJ, Parmeter CF (2015) Applied nonparametric econometrics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  77. Hermes N, Lensink R, Meesters A (2011) Outreach and efficiency of microfinance institutions. World Dev 39:938–948

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Howson C (2013) Adverse incorporation and microfinance among cross-border traders in Senegal. World Dev 42:199–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Hudon M, Traca D (2011) On the efficiency effects of subsidies in microfinance: an empirical inquiry. World Dev 39(6):966–973

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Hughes JP, Mester LJ (1993) A quality and risk-adjusted cost function for banks: evidence on the “too-big-to-fail” doctrine. J Prod Anal 4(3):293–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Hughes JP, Mester LJ (2013) Who said large banks don’t experience scale economies? Evidence from a risk-return-driven cost function. J Financ Intermed 22:559–585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Hughes JP, Mester LJ (2015) Measuring the performance of banks: theory, practice, evidence, and some policy implications. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 247–270

    Google Scholar 

  83. Hulme D, Mosley P (1996) Finance against poverty. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  84. Islam K, O’Gorman M (2019) Microcredit contract design: a macroeconomic evaluation. World Dev 124:104634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Jondrow J, Lovell CAK, Materov IS, Schmidt P (1982) On the estimation of technical efficiency in the stochastic frontier production function model. J Econ 19(2/3):233–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Kendo S (2017) Do decision variables improve microfinance efficiency? A stochastic frontier analysis for African countries. Strateg Chang 26(2):159–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Kevane M, Wydick B (2001) Microenterprise lending to female entrepreneurs: sacrificing economic growth for poverty alleviation? World Dev 29(7):1225–1236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Khachatryan K, Hartarska V, Grigoryan A (2017) Performance and capital structure of microfinance institutions in Eastern Europe and Central Asia. J East Eur Econ 55:395–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Kumar NK (2012) Dynamic incentives in microfinance group lending: an empirical analysis of progressive lending mechanism. SAGE Open 2(2):1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Kumbhakar SC, Lien G, Hardaker JB (2014) Technical efficiency in competing panel data models: a study of Norwegian grain farming. J Prod Anal. 41:321–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Kumbhakar SC, Parmeter CF, Zelenyuk V (2020) Stochastic frontier analysis: foundations and advances I. In: Ray S, Chambers R, Kumbhakar SC (eds) Handbook of production economics. Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. Forthcoming

    Google Scholar 

  92. Kyriazidou E (1997) Estimation of a panel data sample selection model. Econometrica 65(6):1335–1364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Lebovics M, Hermes N, Hudon M (2016) Are financial and social efficiency mutually exclusive? A case study of Vietnamese microfinance institutions. Ann Public Coop Econ 87(1):55–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. León JV (2009) An empirical analysis of Peruvian municipal banks using cost-efficiency frontier approaches. Can J Dev Stud 29(1–2):161–182

    Google Scholar 

  95. Li Q, Racine J (2007) Nonparametric econometrics: theory and practice. Princeton, NJ 08540

    Google Scholar 

  96. Malikov E, Hartarska V (2018) Endogenous scope economies in microfinance institutions. J Bank Financ 93:162–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Malikov E, Hartarska V, Mersland R (2020) Economies of diversification in microfinance: evidence from quantile estimation on panel data. Financ Res Lett 34:101246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Mersland R, Nyarko SA, Szafarz A (2019) Do social enterprises walk the talk? Assessing microfinance performances with mission statements. J Bus Ventur Insights 11:e00217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Mersland R, Strøm R Ø (2009) Performance and governance in microfinance institutions. J Bank Financ 33(4):662–669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  100. Mersland R, Strøm RØ (2010) Microfinance mission drift? World Dev 38(1):28–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. Morduch J (1999) The microfinance promise. J Econ Lit 37:1569–1614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. Morduch J (2000) The microfinance schism. World Dev 28(4):617–629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  103. Morduch J (2020) Why RCTs failed to answer the biggest questions about microcredit impact. World Dev 127:104818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  104. Nawaz A (2010) Performance of microfinance: the role of subsidies. Savings Dev 34(1):97–138

    Google Scholar 

  105. Pal D, Mitra SK (2017) Does the number of borrowers per loan officer influence microfinance institution asset quality? A stochastic frontier analysis. Investigación Económica 76(300):81–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  106. Parmeter CF, Kumbhakar SC (2014) Efficiency analysis: a primer on recent advances. Found Trends Econ 7(3–4):191–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  107. Parmeter CF, Wang H-J, Kumbhakar SC (2017) Nonparametric estimation of the determinants of inefficiency. J Prod Anal 47(3):205–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  108. Parmeter CF, Zelenyuk V (2019) Combining the virtues of stochastic frontier and data envelopment analysis. Oper Res 67(6):1628–1658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  109. Paxton J (2007) Technical efficiency in a semi-formal financial sector: the case of Mexico. Oxford Bull Econ Stat 69(1):57–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  110. Périlleux A, Szafarz A (2015) Women leaders and social performance: evidence from financial cooperatives in Senegal. World Dev 74:437–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  111. Pieters J, Klasen S (2020) Randomization for women’s economic empowerment? Lessons and limitations of randomized experiments. World Dev 127:104820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  112. Porteous N (2006) Competition and microcredit interest rates. CGAP Focus Note No. 33, CGAP, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  113. Pulley LB, Braunstein YM (1992) A composite cost function for multiproduct firms with an application to economies of scope in banking. Rev Econ Stat 74:213–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  114. Pulley LB, Humphrey D (1993) The role of fixed costs and cost complementarities in determining scope economies and the cost of narrow banking proposals. J Bus 66:437–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  115. Quayes S (2015) Outreach and performance of microfinance institutions: a panel analysis. Appl Econ 47(18):1909–1925

    Article  Google Scholar 

  116. Reichert P (2018) A meta-analysis examining the nature of trade-offs in microfinance. Oxford Dev Stud 46(3):430–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  117. Roberts PW (2013) The profit orientation of microfinance institutions and effective interest rates. World Dev 41:120–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  118. Rosenberg R, Gonzalez A, Narain S (2009) The new moneylenders: are the poor being exploited by high microcredit interest rates? In: Occasional paper. CGAP, Washington, DC, pp 1–28

    Google Scholar 

  119. Sagamba M, Shchetinin O, Yusupov N (2013) Do microloan officers want to lend to the less advantaged? Evidence from a choice experiment. World Dev 42:182–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  120. Schurmann AT, Johnston H (2009) The group-lending model and social closure: microcredit, exclusion, and health in Bangladesh. J Health Popul Nutr 27(4):518–527

    Google Scholar 

  121. Sealey Jr CW, Lindley JT (1977) Inputs, outputs, and a theory of production and cost at depository financial institutions. J Financ 32(4):1251–1266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  122. Serrano-Cinca C, Gutiérrez-Nieto B, Mar Molinero C (2011) Social and financial efficiency of microfinance institutions. In: Armendariz B, Labie M (eds) World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte Ltd. Singapore, pp 397–418

    Google Scholar 

  123. Servin R, Lensink R, van den Berg M (2012) Ownership and technical efficiency of microfinance institutions: empirical evidence from Latin America. J Bank Financ 36(7):2136–2144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  124. Silva AC, Chávez GA (2015) Microfinance, country governance, and the global financial crisis. Ventur Cap 17(1–2):191–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  125. Simar L, Wilson PW (2013) Estimation and inference in nonparametric frontier models: recent developments and perspectives. Found Trends Econom 5(2):183–337

    Google Scholar 

  126. Sinclair H (2012) Confessions of a microfinance heretic: how microlending lost its way and betrayed the poor. Berrett-Koehler Publishers Inc., San Fancisco

    Google Scholar 

  127. Strøm R, D’Espallier B, Mersland R (2014) Female leadership, performance, and governance in microfinance institutions. J Bank Financ 42:60–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  128. Tran KC, Tsionas EG (2009) Estimation of nonparametric inefficiency effects stochastic frontier models with an application to British manufacturing. Econ Model 26:904–909

    Article  Google Scholar 

  129. van Cayseele P, Wuyts C (2007) Cost efficiency in the European securities settlement and depository industry. J Bank Financ 31(10):3058–3079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  130. van Rooyen C, Stewart R, de Wet T (2012) The impact of microfinance in Sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review of the evidence. World Dev 40(11):2249–2262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  131. Vogelgesang U (2003) Microfinance in times of crisis: the effects of competition, rising indebtedness, and economic crisis on repayment behavior. World Dev 31(12):2085–2114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  132. Wagner C (2012) From boom to bust: how different has microfinance been from traditional banking? Dev Policy Rev 30(2):187–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  133. Wagner C, Winkler A (2013) The vulnerability of microfinance to financial turmoil – evidence from the global financial crisis. World Dev 51:71–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  134. Wang H-J, Schmidt P (2002) One-step and two-step estimation of the effects of exogenous variables on technical efficiency levels. J Prod Anal 18:129–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  135. Wijesiri M (2016) Weathering the storm: ownership structure and performance of microfinance institutions in the wake of the global financial crisis Econ Model 57:238–247

    Google Scholar 

  136. Wilson PW (2018) Dimension reduction in nonparametric models of production. Eur J Oper Res 267(1):349–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  137. World Bank (2012) World development report 2012: Gender equality and development, Technical report. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/4391

  138. Zamore S, Beisland LA, Mersland R (2019) Geographic diversification and credit risk in microfinance. J Bank Financ 109:105665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  139. Zhou J, Parmeter CF, Kumbhakar SC (2020) Nonparametric estimation of the determinants of inefficiency in the presence of firm heterogeneity. Eur J Oper Res 286(3):1142–1152

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher F. Parmeter .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Parmeter, C.F., Hartarska, V. (2021). Performance of Microfinance Institutions: A Review∗. In: Ray, S.C., Chambers, R., Kumbhakar, S. (eds) Handbook of Production Economics. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3450-3_33-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3450-3_33-1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-3450-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-3450-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics