Skip to main content

The Limits of Reconciliation in Criminal Sentencing

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Limits of Settler Colonial Reconciliation

Abstract

Indigenous people in Australia are vastly over-represented in police custody and prisons. This paper argues that there is a judicial responsibility to take notice of systemic and prejudicial post-colonial circumstances affecting Indigenous people to reduce imprisonment. This may represent a step on the path to reconciliation in the legal system. By eschewing this reconciliatory gesture, Australian courts are complicit in the over-representation of Indigenous people in prisons. By contrast, Canadian judiciaries and legislatures have taken notice of the systemic disadvantage imposed by the legal system and broader colonial society on First Nations people and have sought to promote non-prison sentences for Aboriginal people. But is it enough for Australian courts to adopt the Canadian approach? This chapter draws on the ideas of Alfred (Response, responsibility and renewal: Canada’s truth and reconciliation journey. Aboriginal Healing Foundation, Ottawa: 179–187, 2009) that reconciliation absolves and entrenches colonial injustice by maintaining the dominance of postcolonial jurisdictions, processes and criminogenic assumptions. Resurgence, restitution and regeneration concepts that Alfred introduces as counterpoints to reconciliation, are essential for breaking down the postcolonial structures that subordinate Indigenous people. In the legal system, measures to privilege Indigenous perspectives and knowledges through Indigenous sentencing courts and Indigenous community pre-sentence reports challenge the whiteness of legal discourse and process. However, they are not a substitute for the resurgence of Indigenous governance and ongoing jurisdictional claims that push the limits of reconciliatory gestures in criminal sentencing.

Thalia would like to thank Alison Whittaker for her editing and thoughtful comments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    For example, Aboriginal Protection Act 1869 (Vic); Aborigines Protection Act 1886 (WA); Aboriginals Protection and Restriction of the Sale of Opium Act 1897 (Qld); Aborigines Protection Act 1909 (NSW); Aborigines Act 1911 (SA); Aboriginals Ordinance 1911 (Cth); and Aboriginals Ordinance 1918 (Cth).

  2. 2.

    For example, Aboriginal Protection Act 1869 (Vic) s6; Aborigines Protection Act 1909 (NSW) s9; Aboriginals Protection and Restriction of the Sale of Opium Act 1897 (Qld) s19.

  3. 3.

    In addition to prison, criminal net widening has meant Indigenous people are more likely to also receive other forms of punishment, including fines and community corrections (such as intensive corrections and supervision orders, and parole). In 2011–2012, Indigenous prisoners were 13 times more likely to be serving time in community corrections than non-Indigenous prisoners (Australian Institute of Criminology 2014).

  4. 4.

    In the Australian Capital Territory, Queensland and the Northern Territory, legislation refers specifically to the offender’s cultural background. Sentencing legislation in the Australian Capital Territory specifies that the court must consider whether the cultural background of the offender is relevant. Courts in Queensland, when sentencing an Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander person, must have regard to submissions made by a representative of the community justice group in the offender’s community, including ‘any cultural considerations’ (Penalties and Sentences Act 1992 (Qld) s9(2)(p)). In the Northern Territory, a sentencing court may receive information about an aspect of Indigenous customary law, or the views of members of an Indigenous community (Sentencing Act 1995 (NT) s104A). However, there are major restrictions that limit the receipt of this information, including the fulfilment of certain procedural requirements (s104A), and excluding any information relating to cultural background or customary law to mitigate or aggravate a sentence (Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) ss16A–AA). The latter provision originally required the suspension of the Racial Discrimination Act 1975 (Cth) to allow its passage.

  5. 5.

    Eg, Fernando (1992); R v Minor (1992); Fuller-Cust (2002).

  6. 6.

    Eg Fernando (1992); Munda (2013).

  7. 7.

    Some studies indicate that courts send Indigenous people to prison at a higher rate because of their criminal history and the seriousness of their offending (Snowball and Weatherburn 2006: 5, 2007), although do not compare individual circumstances affecting culpability.

  8. 8.

    Gladue Reports are not available for all Aboriginal offenders or across all provinces, preventing a significant proportion of Aboriginal offenders from having relevant information on their Nation’s circumstances and background presented to sentencing courts.

  9. 9.

    An accepted fact that does not require additional information because of its reliability.

  10. 10.

    In South Australia and Victoria, the Indigenous court processes are also used in higher court levels for serious offences. Some limit the types of offenses that can come before the courts (e.g., breaches of family violence protection orders are excluded in Victoria but associated charges of assault can be brought before the Victorian courts; sexual offenses are excluded in all of the jurisdictions apart from Queensland and South Australia; and certain drug offenses and offenders who are addicted to illicit drugs are excluded in New South Wales and the Australian Capital Territory).

  11. 11.

    Indigenous sentencing courts currently operate in some locations in New South Wales (circle sentencing), Queensland (Murri Courts), Victoria (Koori Courts) and South Australia (Nunga Courts).

  12. 12.

    This issue was raised in the Australian Royal Commission into Aboriginal Deaths in Custody (1991) and was identified in its Recommendation 104 that Aboriginal communities and organisations be consulted in sentencing.

  13. 13.

    Legislation supporting Indigenous sentencing courts include the Magistrates’ Court Act 1989 (Vic) s4D, the Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW) s348, and the Penalties and Sentences Act 1992 (Qld) s9(2)(p).

  14. 14.

    In the Northern Territory, Indigenous people have the potential to be involved in a range of sentencing outcomes that conform with the legislation, including supervising community-styled orders such as exile and participation in a ceremony or a work camp. See Gosford; R v Yakayaka and Djambuy (Unreported, Supreme Court of Northern Territory, Riley CJ, 17 December 2012).

  15. 15.

    In addition, Indigenous community pre-sentencing reports also exists in Queensland. Unlike in the Northern Territory where the Indigenous community directed the process, in Queensland the Department of Justice instigated the program. Community Justice Groups prepare ‘cultural reports’ with the assistance of an Indigenous coordinator from the Department of Justice to inform the court of the background of the offender and the availability of support services. This is a wide-spread program that seeks to be available to all Indigenous people in Queensland facing a sentence of imprisonment.

  16. 16.

    The Royal Commission into Aboriginal Deaths in Custody noted the efficacy of having Aboriginal communities involved in determining, planning and implementing local community service orders: recommendations 109–115.

  17. 17.

    However, in Mabo v Queensland (No.2) (1992: 44–45), Brennan J noted that Indigenous traditions will be observed in so far as they do not fracture the ‘skeleton’ of the common law, and as an ‘act of state’, the High Court could not challenge state sovereignty because it would threaten the courts of the state. See a critique of this position in Anthony (2009).

  18. 18.

    Sutherland (2002) states that Canadian Aboriginal justice programs also do not threaten a western worldview, instead they have the effect of replicating it based on their limited jurisdiction.

  19. 19.

    Numerous studies have pointed to the benefits of being on Country for Indigenous people in terms of their mental wellbeing (Hinton et al. 2015; Burgess et al. 2005).

References

Cases

Secondary materials

  • Aboriginal Provisional Government. (1990). Towards Aboriginal Sovereignty. Online article. Aboriginal Provisional Government. http://nationalunitygovernment.org/sites/default/files/sites/default/files/pdf-doc/towards%5B1%5D.pdf.

  • Alfred, T. (1999). Peace, power, righteousness: An Indigenous manifesto. Ton Mills, ON: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alfred, T. (2005). Wasáse: Indigenous pathways of action and freedom. Peterborough, ON: Broadway Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alfred, T. (2009). Restitution is the real pathway to justice for Indigenous peoples. In G. Younging, J. Dewar, & M. DeGagné (Eds.), Response, responsibility and renewal: Canada’s truth and reconciliation journey (pp. 179–187). Ottawa: Aboriginal Healing Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alfred, T., & Corntassel, J. (2005). Being Indigenous: Resurgences against contemporary colonialism. Government and Opposition, 40(4), 597–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anthony, T. (2009). Indigenous people, crime and punishment. Oxford: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anthony, T. (2013). Commentaries on colonialism: Australian judicial interpretation. In W. Prest (Ed.), Blackstone and his commentaries biography, law, history (pp. 129–150). Oxford: Hart Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anthony, T., & Blagg, H. (2013). STOP in the name of who’s law? Driving and the regulation of contested space in central Australia. Social & Legal Studies, 22(1), 43–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anthony, T., & Chapman, R. (2008). Unresolved tensions: Warlpiri law, police powers and land rights. Indigenous Law Bulletin, 7(5), 9–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anthony, T., & Crawford, W. (2014). Northern Territory Indigenous community sentencing mechanisms: An order for substantive equality. Australian Indigenous Law Review, 17(2), 79–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anthony, T., Bartels, L., & Hopkins, A. (2015). Lessons lost in sentencing: Welding individualised justice to Indigenous justice. Melbourne University Law Review, 39(1), 47–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • April, S., & Orsi, M. (2013). Gladue practices in the provinces and territories. Ottawa: Department of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashworth, A. (2002). Sentencing. In M. Maguire, R. Morgan, & R. Reiner (Eds.), Oxford handbook of criminology (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2015). Prisoners in Australia (No. 4517.0). Canberra, ACT: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Institute of Criminology. (2014). Australian crime: Facts and figures. Canberra: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banks, A. (2015, August 14) Aboriginal court gets the chop. Western Australian.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behrendt, L. (2002). Aboriginal women and the criminal justice system. Judicial Officers’ Bulletin, 16(6), 41–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beranger, B., Weatherburn, D., & Moffatt, S. (2010). Reducing indigenous contact with the court system. Crime and Justice Statistics Bureau Brief, 54, 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blagg, H. (2008). Colonial critique and critical criminology: Issues in aboriginal law and aboriginal violence. In T. Anthony & C. Cunneen (Eds.), The critical criminology companion (pp. 129–146). Sydney: Hawkins Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blokland, J. (2007, September 7). The Northern Territory experience. Paper presented at Australian Institute of Judicial Administration Indigenous Courts Conference at Mildura. Melbourne: Australian Institute of Judicial Administration.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borowski, A. (2011). In Courtroom 7—The children’s Koori Court at work: Findings from an evaluation. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 55(7), 1110–1134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borowski, A. (2010). Indigenous participation in sentencing young offenders: Findings from an evaluation of the children’s Koori Court of Victoria. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 43(3), 465–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • British House of Commons. (1837). Report of the Select Committee on Aborigines. British Parliamentary Papers No 15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, C., Johnston, F., Bowman, D., & Whitehead, P. (2005). Healthy country: Healthy people? Exploring the health benefits of Indigenous natural resource management. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 29(2), 117–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Central Land Council. (2013). Kurdiji building opening day. Online report. Central Land Council. http://www.clc.org.au/files/pdf/130625_kurdiji_opening_feedback_final_compressed_version.pdf.

  • Corntassel, T. (2012). Re-envisioning resurgence: Indigenous pathways to decolonization and sustainable self-determination. Decolonization: Indigeneity Education & Society, 1(1), 86–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coulthard, G. (2014). Red Skin, White Masks: Rejecting the politics of recognition. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cultural and Indigenous Research Centre Australia. (2008). Evaluation of circle sentencing program. Sydney: NSW Attorney General’s Department.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuneen, C. (2016). How ‘tough on crime’ politics flouts death-in-custody recommendations. Online article. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/how-tough-on-crime-politics-flouts-death-in-custody-recommendations-57491.

  • Cunneen, C. (2001). Conflict, politics and crime: Aboriginal communities and the police. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunneen, C., Baldry, E., Brown, D., Schwartz, M., Steel, A., & Brown, M. (2013). Penal culture and hyperincarceration: The revival of the prison. Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dick, D. (2006, February 10–12). Circle sentencing of aboriginal offenders. Paper presented at the Conference on Sentencing: Principles, Perspectives and Possibilities, Canberra. Sydney: Indigenous Justice Clearinghouse.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edney, R. (2005). Imprisonment as a last resort for Indigenous offenders: Some lessons from Canada? Indigenous Law Bulletin, 6(12), 23–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eggleston, E. (1976). Fear, favour or affection: Aborigines and the criminal law in Victoria, South Australia and Western Australia. Canberra: Australian National University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, J. (2009). Why are indigenous imprisonment rates rising? Crime and Justice Statistics Issues Paper, 41, 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, J. (2008). Does circle sentencing reduce aboriginal offending? Crime and Justice Bulletin: Contemporary Issues in Crime and Justice, 115, 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaykamangu, J. (2012). Ngarra law: Aboriginal customary law from Arnhem Land. Northern Territory Law Journal, 2(4), 236–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaymarani, G. (2011). An introduction to the Ngarra Law of Arnhem Land. Northern Territory Law Journal, 1, 283–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gondarra, D. (2006). Traditional law is keeping the peace on aboriginal lands. Media Release. Aboriginal Resource and Development Services, http://www.supremecourt.nt.gov.au/media/docs/commonwealth_intervention.pdf. Accessed June 25, 2007.

  • Gondarra, D. (2011, March 3). Assent law of the first people: Views from a traditional owner. National Indigenous Times, p. 24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannah-Moffat, K., & Maurutto, P. (2010). Recontextualising pre-sentence reports: Risk and race. Punishment and Society, 12(3), 262–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannam, H. (2013, July 18). Current issues in delivering indigenous justice: Challenges for the courts. Paper presented to the Australian Institute of Judicial Administration Conference, Adelaide. Melbourne: Australian Institute of Judicial Administration.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, C. (1993). Whiteness as property. Harvard Law Review, 106(8), 1707–1791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasluck, P. (1953). Native welfare in Australia. Perth: Patterson Brokenshaw.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasluck, P. (1988). Shades of darkness: Aboriginal affairs 1925–1965. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haswell, M., Williams, M., Blignault, I., Grand Ortega, M., & Jackson Pulver, L. (2014). Returning home, back to community from custodial care: Learnings from the first year pilot project evaluation of three sites around Australia. Sydney: Muru Marri, UNSW Australia School of Public Health and Community Medicine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinton, R., Kavanagh, D. J., Barclay, L., Chenhall, R., & Nagel, T. (2015). Developing a best practice pathway to support improvements in Indigenous Australians’ mental health and well-being: A qualitative study. BMJ Open,. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007938.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogg, R. (2001). Penality and modes of regulating indigenous people in Australia. Punishment and Society, 3(3), 355–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, B. (2006). Punishing monsters, judging aliens: Justice at the borders of community. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 39(2), 232–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunyor, J. (2015). Imprison Me NT: Paperless arrests and the rise of executive power in the Northern Territory. Indigenous Law Bulletin, 8(21), 3–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffries, S., & Bond, C. (2009). Does indigeneity matter? Sentencing indigenous offenders in South Australia’s higher courts. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 42(1), 47–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeffries, S., & Stenning, P. (2014). Sentencing aboriginal offenders: Law, policy, and practice in three countries. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 56, 447–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karp, P. (2016, March 19). Indigenous organisations have been “disadvantaged” by grants program. The Guardian.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurdiji—Lajamanu Law and Justice Group. (2014). Kurdiji. Online report. Lajamanu Visitor Guide http://www.clc.org.au/files/pdf/KurdijiNEbook-6.pdf.

  • Lockwood, K., Hart, T. C., & Stewart, A. (2015). First nations peoples and judicial sentencing: Main effects and the impact of contextual variability. British Journal of Criminology, 55(4), 769–789.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loy, D. (2010). Bush law. Message Stick [Television programme]. Sydney, NSW: Australian Broadcasting Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luke, G., & Cunneen, C. (1998). Sentencing aboriginal people in the Northern Territory: A statistical analysis. Sydney: Institute of Criminology, Sydney University Law School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchetti, E. (2010). Indigenous sentencing courts and partner violence: Perspectives of court practitioners and elders on gender power imbalances during the sentencing hearing. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 43(2), 263–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marchetti, E., & Daly, K. (2007). Indigenous sentencing courts: Towards a theoretical and jurisprudential model. Sydney Law Review, 29(3), 416–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchetti, E., & Daly, K. (2012). Innovative justice processes. In M. Marmo, W. de Lint, & D. Palmer (Eds.), Crime and justice: A guide to criminology (pp. 455–481). Sydney: Thompson Reuters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchetti, E., & Ransley, J. (2015). Applying the critical lens to judicial officers and legal practitioners involved in sentencing indigenous offenders: Will anyone or anything do? University of New South Wales Law Journal, 37(1), 1–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Methven, E. (2014). A very expensive lesson: Counting the costs of penalty notices for anti-social behaviour. Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 26(2), 249–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreton-Robinson, A. (2003). I still call Australia home: Indigenous belonging and place in a white postcolonising society. In S. Ahmed, C. Cataneda, A. M. Fortier, & M. Shellyey (Eds.), Uproot-ings/regroupings: Questions of postcoloniality, home and place (pp. 23–40). Oxford: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, A., & Louis, E. (2010). Evaluation of the Queensland Murri Court: Final report. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Shane, P. (1992). Aborigines and the criminal justice system. In C. Cunneen (Ed.), Aboriginal perspectives on criminal justice. Sydney: Institute of Criminology, University of Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pilkington, J. (2009). Aboriginal communities and the Police’s Taskforce Themis: Case studies in remote aboriginal community policing in the Northern Territory. Darwin: North Australian Aboriginal Justice Agency and Central Australian Legal Aid Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pugliese, J. (2007). The event-trauma of the carceral post-human. Social Semiotics, 17(1), 63–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, J. R. (2016, March 17). Cultivating sympathy and reconciliation: The importance of sympathetic response in the uptake of transitional justice. Paper presented to the Annual Convention of the International Studies Association, Atlanta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regan, P. (2010). Unsettling the settler within Indian residential schools, truth telling, and reconciliation in Canada. Vancouver: UBC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Royal Commission into Aboriginal Deaths in Custody. (1991). Final report. Canberra: Australian Government Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherwood, J. (2013). Colonisation—It’s bad for your health: The context of Aboriginal health. Contemporary Nurse, 46(1), 28–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snowball, L., & Weatherburn, D. (2006). Indigenous over-representation in prison: The role of offender characteristics. Contemporary Issues in Crime and Justice: Crime and Justice Bulletin, 99, 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snowball, L., & Weatherburn, D. (2007). Does racial bias in sentencing contribute to indigenous overrepresentation in prison? Australian and New Journal Criminology, 40(3), 272–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steele, L., Dowse, L., & Trofimovs, J. (2016). Who is diverted?: Moving beyond diagnosed impairment towards a social and political analysis of diversion. Sydney Law Review, 38(2), 179–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, J. (2002). Colonialism, crime, and dispute resolution: A critical analysis of Canada’s aboriginal justice strategy. Online article. Mediate.com. http://www.mediate.com/articles/sutherlandJ.cfm.

  • Thomas, B. (1999). Circle sentencing: Involving aboriginal communities in the sentencing process. Discussion Paper. Sydney: New South Wales Aboriginal Justice Advisory Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorpe, B. (1992). Aboriginal employment and unemployment: Colonised labour. In C. Williams & B. Thorpe (Eds.), Beyond industrial sociology: The work of men and women (pp. 88–107). Sydney: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wahlquist, C. (2016, February 25). ‘It’s the same story’: How Australia and Canada are twinning on bad outcomes for Indigenous people. The Guardian, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/feb/25/indigenous-australians-and-canadians-destroyed-by-same-colonialism.

  • Watson, J. (1995). “We couldn’t tolerate any more”: The Palm Island Strike of 1957. Labour History, 69, 149–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thalia Anthony .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Anthony, T. (2016). The Limits of Reconciliation in Criminal Sentencing. In: Maddison, S., Clark, T., de Costa, R. (eds) The Limits of Settler Colonial Reconciliation. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2654-6_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2654-6_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-2653-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-2654-6

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics