Abstract
The widespread Confucian revival in East Asia, along with the rapid socioeconomic development of certain nations in that region, coincided with thorough examinations of nationhood, ethnicity , and cultural identity in theory, research, and policies on a global level. Following an era of imperialism, a presumed shared set of ideas and values—a sort of common worldview—allowed for the perceptions of East Asia as a relatively homogeneous whole, regardless of the many conflicts that had previously occurred between its peoples. This chapter examines contemporary academic research to determine who is perceived as East Asian when sampling populations today. Scholars blend nations into this collective label indicating ethnic and cultural belonging, and special focus is placed on discerning which nations are included and in what way. Case studies of methodological approaches in referential literature analyze whether research designs have begun to take into account the vast cultural diversity of East Asia, current trends of multiculturalism and globalization, and massive migrations, as well as how Japan is positioned within these methodologies. As today’s science is likely the basis of tomorrow’s policies, this study offers a relational approach to ethnic and cultural identities, while stressing the importance of responsible research.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Here I refer to Erwin Schrodinger’s famous thought experiment, Schrodinger’s cat, illustrating his perception of quantum superposition. The cat is imagined enclosed in a box with a radioactive source and a flask filled with poison that will be released whenever the source happens to emit radiation. According to quantum mechanics, the cat is considered to be simultaneously both dead and alive, until the box is opened and it is seen as either dead or alive.
- 2.
Here I refer to Thomas Kuhn’s notable contributions to the philosophy of science, specifically the concept of necessary periodical paradigm shifts and the view that a scientific truth is not an objective fact, but rather a matter of consensus of a community of scientists, a product of necessarily subjective perspectives of the researcher and participants, in the case of empirical research.
- 3.
The UN Statistics Division terms the region in question Eastern Asia, not East Asia (dividing Asia into: Central, Eastern, Southern, South-Eastern, and Western). In the rare examples of the usage of the term Eastern Asia in scholarly work, it has been used to include what is conventionally known as East Asia (mainly, China, Japan, and Korea) and South-East Asia (e.g. Mackerras 1992). Eastern (same as western, southern, and northern) tends to be used more for geographical, indefinite areas, while east (same as west, south, and north), as an adjective, tends to be used more for specific, often political or administrative divisions, but this is just a linguistic tendency. Still, it is interesting to note that, in addition to East versus Eastern, in the literature examined for this chapter there are also frequent differences in the choice of adjectives when terming counterparts in the East-West dichotomy, e.g. East Asia is in relation to Western Europe, not West Europe (e.g. Holcombe 2011). The differences in terms can, of course, be purely arbitrary or a matter of custom, but it could be interesting to survey the motivation of scholars using different versions of the adjectives for different regions of the world.
References
Ahn, D. (1999). Visiting elective students at the University of Toronto from the Korea University Medical College. Medical Education, 33(6), 460–465.
Alcoff, L. M. (2006). Visible identities: Race, gender, and the self. Oxford University Press.
Alcoff, L. M., & Mendieta, E. (Eds.). (2003). Identities: Race, class, gender, and nationality. Hoboken: Blackwell Publishing.
Banerjee, A., & Chaudhury, S. (2010). Statistics without tears: Populations and samples. Industrial Psychiatry Journal, 19(1), 60.
Barry, D. T., & Grilo, C. M. (2003). Cultural, self-esteem, and demographic correlates of perception of personal and group discrimination among East Asian immigrants. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 73(2), 223.
Barth, F. (1969). Ethnic groups and boundaries: The social organization of culture difference. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
Beeson, M., & Stubbs, R. (Eds.). (2012). Routledge handbook of Asian regionalism. London: Routledge.
Bellah, R. N. (1965). Japan’s cultural identity: Some reflections on the work of Watsuji Tetsuro. The Journal of Asian Studies, 24(04), 573–594.
Brennan, L., & Murray, P. (Eds.). (2015). Drivers of integration and regionalism in Europe and Asia: Comparative perspectives. London: Routledge.
Brubaker, R. (2004). Ethnicity without groups. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Chon, K. K., & Hahn, D. W. (2001). Emotions and creativity, East and West. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 4, 165–183.
Drubin, D. G., & Kellogg, D. R. (2012). English as the universal language of science: Opportunities and challenges. Molecular Biology of the Cell, 23(8), 1399.
Ember, C. R. (2009). Cross-cultural research methods. Lanham: Rowman Altamira.
Fackler, M. (2015, May 30). Biracial beauty queen challenges Japan’s self-image. The New York Times, A4.
Fisher, C. B., Wallace, S. A., & Fenton, R. E. (2000). Discrimination distress during adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 29(6), 679–695.
Ginsberg, E. K. (Ed.). (1996). Passing and the fictions of identity. Durham: Duke University Press.
Gould, S. J. (1996). The mismeasure of man (revised and expanded). London: W. W. Norton and Company.
Gracia, J. J. E. (2005). Surviving race, ethnicity, and nationality: A challenge for the twenty-first century. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Gracia, J. J. E. (Ed.). (2007). Race or ethnicity? On Black and Latino identity. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Graves, J. L. (2002). The emperor’s new clothes: Biological theories of race at the millennium. Ithaca: Rutgers University Press.
Grosfoguel, R. (2004). Race and ethnicity or racialized ethnicities? Identities within global coloniality. Ethnicities, 4(3), 315–336.
Hall, S. (1990). Cultural Identity and Diaspora. In J. Rutherford (Ed.), Identity: Community, culture, difference (pp. 17–46). London: Lawrence and Wishart.
Hedden, T., Park, D. C., Nisbett, R., Ji, L. J., Jing, Q., & Jiao, S. (2002). Cultural variation in verbal versus spatial neuropsychological function across the life span. Neuropsychology, 16(1), 65.
Heine, S. J., & Hamamura, T. (2007). In search of East Asian self-enhancement. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11(1), 4–27.
Hinkel, E. (1994). Native and nonnative speakers’ pragmatic interpretations of English texts. Tesol Quarterly, 28(2), 353–376.
Holcombe, C. (2001). The genesis of East Asia: 221 B.C.—A.D. 907. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
Holcombe, C. (2011). A history of East Asia: From the origins of civilization to the twenty-first century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Holley, P. (2015, March 20). Why some critics think Japan’s miss universe contestant isn’t Japanese enough. The Washington Post, http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2015/03/20/why-some-critics-think-japans-miss-universe-contestant-isnt-japanese-enough/. Accessed 15 October 2015.
Hong, J. J., & Woody, S. R. (2007). Cultural mediators of self-reported social anxiety. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45(8), 1779–1789.
Hudson, M. (1999). Ruins of identity: Ethnogenesis in the Japanese Islands. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
Jackson, J., & Molokotos-Liederman, L. (Eds.). (2015). Nationalism, ethnicity and boundaries: Conceptualising and understanding identity through boundary approaches. London: Routledge.
Jenkins, R. (2015). Boundaries and borders. In J. Jackson & L. Molokotos-Liederman (Eds.), Nationalism, ethnicity and boundaries: Conceptualising and understanding identity through boundary approaches (pp. 11–27). London: Routledge.
Katzenstein, P. J., & Shiraishi, T. (Eds.). (2006). Beyond Japan: The dynamics of East Asian regionalism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Korhonen, P. (2002). Asia’s Chinese name. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, 3(2), 253–270.
Kowner, R. (2000). ‘Lighter than Yellow, but not Enough’: Western Discourse on the Japanese ‘Race’, 1854–1904. The Historical Journal, 43(01), 103–131.
Kowner, R. (2013). Between contempt and fear: Western racial constructions of East Asians since 1800. In R. Kowner & W. Demel (Eds.), Race and racism in modern East Asia: Western and eastern constructions (pp. 87–125). Leiden: Brill.
Krimsky, S., & Sloan, K. (Eds.). (2011). Race and the genetic revolution: Science, myth, and culture. New York: Columbia University Press.
Lau-Gesk, L. G. (2003). Activating culture through persuasion appeals: An examination of the bicultural consumer. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13(3), 301–315.
Lieberman, L., Kaszycka, K. A., Martinez, A. J., Yablonsky, F. L., Kirk, R. C., Štrkalj, G., et al. (2004). The race concept in six regions: Variation without consensus. Collegium antropologicum, 28(2), 907–921.
Lu, L. C., Rose, G. M., & Blodgett, J. G. (1999). The effects of cultural dimensions on ethical decision making in marketing: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Ethics, 18(1), 91–105.
Mackerras, C. (1992). Eastern Asia: An introductory history. Melbourne: Longman Cheshire.
Marks, J. (2003). What it means to be 98 % chimpanzee: Apes, people, and their genes. Berkeley: University of California Press.
McGarty, C., Yzerbyt, V. Y., & Spears, R. (2002). Stereotypes as explanations: The formation of meaningful beliefs about social groups. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McLaughlin, E. (2007). The equality chameleon: Reflections on social identity, passing, and groupism. Social Policy and Society, 6(01), 69–79.
McNeil, B. (2015, March 18). From a minstrel no-show to a black beauty queen, in a week. The Japan Times, online edition: http://www.japantimes.co.jp/community/2015/03/18/our-lives/minstrel-show-black-beauty-queen-week/. Accessed 15 October 2015.
Miller, J. (2008). Modern East Asia: An introductory history. Armonk: M. E. Sharpe.
Mok, A., & Morris, M. W. (2010). Asian-Americans’ creative styles in Asian and American situations: Assimilative and contrastive responses as a function of bicultural identity integration. Management and Organization Review, 6(3), 371–390.
Mowery, D. C., & Oxley, J. E. (1995). Inward technology transfer and competitiveness: The role of national innovation systems. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19(1), 67–93.
Nelson, M. R., Bryc, K., King, K. S., Indap, A., Boyko, A. R., Novembre, J., et al. (2008). The population reference sample, POPRES: A resource for population, disease, and pharmacological genetics research. The American Journal of Human Genetics, 83(3), 347–358.
Paasi, A. (2009a). The resurgence of the ‘region’ and ‘regional identity’: Theoretical perspectives and empirical observations on regional dynamics in Europe. Review of international studies, 35(S1), 121–146.
Paasi, A. (2009b). Bounded spaces in a ‘borderless world’: Border studies, power and the anatomy of territory. Journal of Power, 2(2), 213–234.
Paasi, A. (2010). Regions are social constructs, but who or what ‘constructs’ them? Agency in question. Environment and Planning A, 42(10), 2296–2301.
Paasi, A. (2011). The region, identity, and power. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 14, 9–16.
Ross, M., Xun, W. E., & Wilson, A. E. (2002). Language and the bicultural self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(8), 1040–1050.
Saaler, S., & Szpilman, C. W. A. (Eds.). (2011a). Pan-Asianism: A documentary history, 1850–1920 (Vol. 1). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Saaler, S., & Szpilman, C. W. A. (Eds.). (2011b). Pan-Asianism: A Documentary History, 1920–Present (Vol. 2). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Said, E. (2006). Orientalism: Western conceptions of the orient. London: Penguin Books.
Stokes, B. (2015). How Asia-Pacific publics see each other and their national leaders. Report. Pew Research Center. http://www.pewglobal.org/files/2015/09/Pew-Research-Center-Asian-Views-of-Each-Other-Report-FINAL-September-2-2015.pdf. Accessed 15 October 2015.
Takahashi, K. (2015, May 8). Multiracial miss universe Japan symbolizes the country’s transformation. The Huffington Post, online edition: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/05/08/multiracial-miss-universe_n_7205026.html. Accessed 15 October 2015.
Tankha, B. (Ed.). (2008). Okakura Tenshin and Pan-Asianism: Shadows of the past. Leiden: Brill.
The Genron NPO., & China Daily. (2014). The 10th Japan-China public opinion poll: Analysis report on the comparative data. http://www.genron-npo.net/en/pp/docs/10th_Japan-China_poll.pdf. Accessed 15 October 2015.
United Nations Statistics Division. (2015). Standard country or area codes for statistical use. http://millenniumindicators.un.org/unsd/methods/m49/m49.htm. Accessed 15 October 2015.
Urry, J. (2000). Sociology beyond societies: Mobilities for the twenty-first century. London: Routledge.
Vizioli, L., Rousselet, G. A., & Caldara, R. (2010). Neural repetition suppression to identity is abolished by other-race faces. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(46), 20081–20086.
Vlassopoulos, K. (2013). Greeks and barbarians. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Williams, B. (1981). Moral luck: Philosophical papers 1973–1980. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gledić, J. (2016). Blending Ethnicities: Perceptions of East Asian Identities Today. In: Sugita, Y. (eds) Social Commentary on State and Society in Modern Japan. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2395-8_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2395-8_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-2394-1
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-2395-8
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)