Skip to main content

No-Place, New Places: Death and Its Rituals in Urban Asia

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Place/No-Place in Urban Asian Religiosity

Part of the book series: ARI - Springer Asia Series ((ARI,volume 5))

  • 450 Accesses

Abstract

In many Asian cities, particularly those that confront increasing land scarcity, the conversion from burial to cremation has been encouraged by state agencies in the last several decades. From Hong Kong to Seoul to Singapore, planning agencies have sought to reduce the use of space for the dead, in order to release land for the use of the living. More secular guiding principles regarding efficient land use in these cities had originally come up against the symbolic values invested in burial spaces, resulting in conflicts between different value systems. In more recent years, however, the shift to cremation and columbaria has been marked and even voluntary. In still more recent years, even columbaria have become overcrowded, and sea burials (the scattering of ashes in the seas) are being encouraged, as are woodland burials (the scattering of ashes in woodlands or around trees) in places like Hong Kong and Taipei. Indeed, the latter has been promoted as the β€œnew eco-friendly burial method.” As burial methods change, so too do commemorative rituals, and the annual Qingming Festival (tomb sweeping) has seen the rise of new online and mobile phone rituals in China. This paper traces the ways in which physical spaces for the dead in several Asian cities have diminished and changed over time, the growth of virtual space for them, the accompanying discourses that influence these dynamics, and the new rituals that emerge concomitantly with the contraction of land space.

Although initially written for the conference that preceded this volume, this chapter was first published in substantially the same content but in a longer version in Kong, L. (2011): β€œNo-place, new places: death and its rituals in urban Asia,” published online in Urban Studies; printed version in 2012 as 49(2): 412–430 (http://usj.sagepub.com/content/49/2/415.abstract). This is reprinted with permission from Urban Studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Qingming Festival is a yearly festival during which families honor their departed. It entails a visit to the gravesite to clean it and to make offerings (usually flowers, candles, and incense).

  2. 2.

    I thank Andrew Willford for offering this perspective.

  3. 3.

    β€œFirst Time Human Ashes are Legally Scattered into Sea,” Ming Pao, April 8, 2007 (translated from Chinese).

  4. 4.

    β€œHong Kong Should Encourage and Not Restrict Sea Burials,” Reuters China, March 14, 2007 (translated from Chinese).

  5. 5.

    FEHD Committee, Extracts from Meeting Minutes.

  6. 6.

    Ibid.

  7. 7.

    β€œTaipei City Running Out of Cemetery Space: Sea Burials Being Promoted in Recent Years Together with Other New Forms of Burial,” Central News Agency, 18 October, 2004 (translated from Chinese).

  8. 8.

    β€œFuneral Palours Encourage Eco-friendly Burials,” China Times, December 22, 2004 (translated from Chinese).

  9. 9.

    In the various cities, it is not uncommon to have more than one government agency oversee some aspect of death and burial practices, ranging from social welfare to health and environment. This reflects the multiple dimensions of the phenomenon.

  10. 10.

    β€œTaipei Dispenses with Traditional Notions and Pushes for Tree Burials; Close to 800 People Buried,” HK China News Agency, August 21, 2007 (translated from Chinese).

  11. 11.

    This was analyzed by examining major newspaper reports principally from 2003 (when the woodland burials first started) to 2007.

  12. 12.

    HK China News Agency, β€œTaipei Dispenses with Traditional Notions.”

  13. 13.

    β€œTeacher’s Ashes to be Scattered into the Sea,” United Daily News, May 21, 2006 (translated from Chinese).

  14. 14.

    β€œTaipei’s Woodland Burials Looked on in Approval,” HK China News Agency, September 18, 2003 (translated from Chinese).

  15. 15.

    β€œWoodland Burials: Plans to Start Charging a Fee,” China Times, August 28, 2006 (translated from Chinese).

  16. 16.

    HK China News Agency, β€œTaipei’s Woodland Burials.”

  17. 17.

    β€œWoodland Burials are Eco-friendly; a Family Woodland Burial is a Novelty,” Central News Agency, August 21, 2007 (translated from Chinese).

  18. 18.

    β€œDharma Drum Mountain Holds Symposium to Promote Eco-friendly Burials,” Central News Agency, December 19, 2004 (translated from Chinese).

  19. 19.

    β€œWoodland Burials are Extremely Popular One Year On,” China Times Express, 9 November, 2004 (translated from Chinese); HK China News Agency, β€œTaipei Dispenses with Traditional Notions.”

  20. 20.

    β€œCountry and City Governments Jointly Organise Sea Burial in Early May,” China Times, March 13, 2007 (translated from Chinese).

  21. 21.

    β€œIs Online Tomb Sweeping More Liberal and Advanced?,” Singapore Press Holdings, April 3, 2003 (translated from Chinese).

  22. 22.

    β€œPlacing Offerings Changes the Feel of Woodland Burials,” China Times, April 6, 2007 (translated from Chinese).

  23. 23.

    β€œChinese Turn to New Ways of Burial,” People’s Daily, April 6, 2001 (translated from Chinese).

  24. 24.

    β€œMore People in China Turn to Paying Respects to the Dead Online,” Xinhua News Agency, April 3, 2007 (translated from Chinese).

  25. 25.

    Email interview with owner of the owner of a commercial company offering the services who wished to remain anonymous (April 12, 2009).

  26. 26.

    Interview with Zhao G., CASS, 15 May 2009.

  27. 27.

    β€œSending Words of Remembrance Online During Qing Ming is the New Trend,” China News, April 4, 2007 (translated from Chinese).

  28. 28.

    β€œWhy Online Mourning hasn’t Caught on with the People,” China Internet Network Information Centre (CINIC), April 10, 2006 (translated from Chinese).

  29. 29.

    CINIC, β€œOnline Mourning”; Xinhua News Agency, β€œRespects to the Dead Online.”

  30. 30.

    James Everett Katz and Ronald E. Rice, Social Consequences of Internet Use: Access, Involvement, and Interaction (Boston: MIT Press, 2002): 316.

  31. 31.

    β€œChina Advocates for the Paying of Respects Online During Qing Ming to Conserve the Environment,” Reuters China, April 5, 2006 (translated from Chinese).

  32. 32.

    CINIC, β€œOnline Mourning.”

  33. 33.

    β€œTomb Sweeping with Just a Mouse Click; Paying Respects Online gets Popular This Year,” China Information Industry, April 10, 2002 (translated from Chinese).

  34. 34.

    Email interview, June 18, 2009.

  35. 35.

    CINIC, β€œOnline Mourning.”

  36. 36.

    Xinhua News Agency, β€œRespects to the Dead Online.”

  37. 37.

    China Information Industry Net, β€œTomb Sweeping.”

  38. 38.

    China Information Industry Net, β€œTomb Sweeping.”

  39. 39.

    China Information Industry Net, β€œTomb Sweeping.”

  40. 40.

    Ibid.

  41. 41.

    CINIC, β€œOnline Mourning.”

  42. 42.

    I would like to acknowledge Andrew Willford for these words, made as a commentary on an earlier version of this paper.

  43. 43.

    Internet World Statistics β€œAsia Internet Facebook Usage and Population Statistics.” Accessed August 31, 2009. http://www.internetworldstats.com/asia.htm

References

  • Bloch, Maurice and Jonathan Parry. (eds.) 1982. Death and the Regeneration of Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google ScholarΒ 

  • Bollig, Michael, 1997. β€œContested Places: Graves and Graveyards in Himba Culture.” Anthropos 92, 1.3: 35–50.

    Google ScholarΒ 

  • Chan, Wing-Tsit. 1953. Religious Trends in Modern China. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google ScholarΒ 

  • Cerulo, Karen A. and Janet M. Ruane. 1997. β€œDeath Becomes Alive: Technology and the Reconceptualization of Death.” Science as Culture 6 (28): 444–466.

    ArticleΒ  Google ScholarΒ 

  • Food and Environmental Hygiene Department (FEHD) Committee. 2007. Extracts from Meeting Minutes, March 13.

    Google ScholarΒ 

  • Geser, Hans. 1998. β€œYours Virtually Forever: Death Memorials and Remembrance Sites in the WWW: Towards Cybersociety and β€˜Vireal’ Social Relations” Sociology in Switzerland, Online Publications. Accessed July 9, 2001. http://socio.ch/intcom/t_hgeser07.htm.

  • Hartig, Kate V. and Kevin M Dunn. 1998. β€œRoadside Memorials: Interpreting New Deathscapes in Newcastle, New South Wales.” Australian Geographical Studies 36(1): 5–20.

    Google ScholarΒ 

  • Hong Kong Legislative Council. 2006. β€œLegislative Council Meeting Second Topic: Provision of Columbarium Niches.” November 15. http://www.info.gov.hk/gia/general/200611/15/P200611150145.htm.

  • Hong Kong Legislative Council. 2007. β€œLegislative Council Paper No. CB (2) I597/06-07(01): Objection to Sea Burials Near The Brothers. Accessed May 20, 2009. http://www.legco.gov.hk/yr06-07/english/panels/fseh/papers/fe0508cb2-1597-1-e.pdf.

  • Huang, Shun-Chun Lucy. 2007. β€œIntentions for the Recreational Use of Public Landscaped Cemeteries in Taiwan.” Landscape Research 32(2): 207-223.

    ArticleΒ  Google ScholarΒ 

  • Huntington, Richard and Peter Metcalf. 1979. Celebrations of Death: The Anthropology of Mortuary Ritual. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google ScholarΒ 

  • Urbina, Ian. 2006. β€œIn Online Mourning, Don’t Speak Ill of the Dead.” New York Times, November 5.

    Google ScholarΒ 

  • Internet World Statistics. 2009. β€œAsia Internet Facebook Usage and Population Statistics.” Accessed August 31, 2009. http://www.internetworldstats.com/asia.htm.

  • Katz, James Everett and Ronald E. Rice. 2002. Social Consequences of Internet Use: Access, Involvement, and Interaction. Boston: MIT Press.

    Google ScholarΒ 

  • Knapp, Ronald. 1977. β€œThe Changing Landscape of the Chinese Cemetery.” The China Geographer 8(1): 1–14.

    Google ScholarΒ 

  • Kong, Lily. 1999. β€œCemeteries and Columbaria, Memorials and Mausoleums: Narrative and Interpretation in the Study of Deathscapes in Geography.” Australian Geographical Studies 37 (1): 1–10.

    ArticleΒ  Google ScholarΒ 

  • Kong, Lily. 2007. β€œCultural Icons and Urban Development in Asia: Economic Imperative, National Identity and Global City Status.” Political Geography 26(4): 383-404.

    ArticleΒ  Google ScholarΒ 

  • Ku, Agnes Shuk-Mei. 2009. β€œContradictions in the Development of Citizenship in Hong Kong: Governance without Democracy.” Asian Survey 49(3): 505–527.

    ArticleΒ  Google ScholarΒ 

  • Lau, Mimi. 2007. β€œScattering of Ashes at Sea Wins Support.” The Standard, January 10.

    Google ScholarΒ 

  • Lee, Hyun Song. 1996. β€œChange in Funeral Customs in Contemporary Korea.” Korea Journal 36(2): 49–60.

    Google ScholarΒ 

  • Linebaugh, Kate. 2007. β€œHong Kong’s Burial Sites and Overcrowding.” Wall Street Journal China, August 10.

    Google ScholarΒ 

  • Morris, Mandy S. 1997. β€œGardens β€˜for Ever England’: Landscape, Identity and the First World War British Cemeteries on the Western Front.” Ecumene 4(4): 410–434.

    Google ScholarΒ 

  • Nakagawa, Tadashi. 1995. β€œGravestone Landscape Evolution of a Japanese Rural Community.” Geography of Religions & Belief Systems 17(3): 1–3.

    Google ScholarΒ 

  • Newell, William H. 1976. β€œGood and Bad Ancestors.” In Ancestors edited by W.H. Newell, 17–29. The Hague, Paris: Mouton Publishers.

    Google ScholarΒ 

  • Tan, Boon Hui and Brenda S.A. Yeoh. 2002. β€œThe β€˜Remains of the Dead’: Spatial Politics of Nation Building in Post-War Singapore.” Research in Human Ecology 9(1): 1–13.

    Google ScholarΒ 

  • Teather, Elizabeth Kenworthy. 1998. β€œThe Heritage Values of Hong Kong’s Urban Chinese Cemeteries.” In Proceedings, 3rd International Seminar, Forum UNESCO: University and Heritage (4–8 October) edited by W.S Logan, C. Long, and J. Martin, 104–109. Melbourne: Deakin University.

    Google ScholarΒ 

  • Teather, Elizabeth Kenworthy. 2001. β€œThe Case of the Disorderly Graves: Contemporary Deathscapes in Guangzhou.” Social and Cultural Geography 2(2): 185–202.

    ArticleΒ  Google ScholarΒ 

  • Teather, Elizabeth K., Un Rii Hae and Hye Kim Eun. 2001. β€œSeoul’s Deathscapes: Incorporating Tradition into Modern Time-Space.” Environment and Planning A 33(8): 1489–1506.

    ArticleΒ  Google ScholarΒ 

  • Tong, Chee Kiong. 2004. Chinese Death Rituals in Singapore. Leiden: Brill.

    Google ScholarΒ 

  • Tong, Chee Kiong and Lily Kong. 2000. β€œReligion and Modernity: Ritual Transformations and the Reconstruction of Space and Time.” Social and Cultural Geography 1(1): 29–44.

    ArticleΒ  Google ScholarΒ 

  • Tremlett, Paul-FranΓ§ois, β€œDeath-Scapes in Taipei and Manila: a Postmodern Necrography.” Taiwan in Comparative Perspective 1 (2007): 23–36.

    Google ScholarΒ 

  • Yeoh, Brenda S. A. 1991. β€œThe Control of β€œSacred” Space: Conflicts Over the Chinese Burial Grounds in Colonial Singapore, 1880–1930.” Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 22(2): 282–311.

    ArticleΒ  Google ScholarΒ 

  • Yeoh, Brenda S. A. and Tan, Boon Hui. 1995. β€œThe Politics of Space: Changing Discourses on Chinese Burial Grounds in Post-war Singapore.” Journal of Historical Geography 21(2): 184–201.

    ArticleΒ  Google ScholarΒ 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lily Kong .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

Β© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kong, L. (2016). No-Place, New Places: Death and Its Rituals in Urban Asia. In: Waghorne, J. (eds) Place/No-Place in Urban Asian Religiosity. ARI - Springer Asia Series, vol 5. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0385-1_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0385-1_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-0384-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-0385-1

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics