Abstract
In his volume on the Treaty of Amsterdam, Francisco Lucas Pires provided a thorough and critical analysis of the then recently approved Treaty. In particular, he examined whether the Treaty of Amsterdam marked the shift from a European integration process focused on the market to a European society, and he showed extraordinary capacities to foresee how the European Union (EU) would develop from then onwards. This chapter first examines Francisco Lucas Pires’ views on the Treaty of Amsterdam and the single currency in general and assesses the evolution the EU has witnessed since. The following part of this analysis is devoted specifically to the study of the features of the EU’s economic institutional governance contained in the postscript). The final section concludes.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
This decision was taken at the European Council meeting held in Hannover on 27–28 June 1988 during which the Heads of State and Government agreed to appoint a committee to study ways to achieve a European economic and monetary union. This Committee, chaired by then Commission President Delors, produced a report on economic and monetary union in the European Community in April 1989. Committee for the study of the Economic and Monetary Union 1989.
- 2.
Lucas Pires 2020, Chap. 1 in the present book.
- 3.
Indeed, the Maastricht Treaty included a reference to EMU in its text for the first time; it also foresaw the creation of the European Central Bank.
- 4.
Lucas Pires 2020, Chap. 1 in the present book.
- 5.
For instance: Spiegel online, “Germany Open to Possible Greek Euro Zone Exit”, 5.1.2015.
- 6.
Eurobarometer 2017.
- 7.
Eurobarometer 2018.
- 8.
Lucas Pires 2020, Chap. 1 in the present book.
- 9.
Lucas Pires 2020, Chap. 1 in the present book.
- 10.
Lucas Pires 2020, Chap. 1 in the present book.
- 11.
Further on the right to petition: Tiburcio 2015.
- 12.
- 13.
- 14.
Lucas Pires 2020, Chap. 1 in the present book.
- 15.
Lucas Pires 2020, Chap. 2 in the present book.
- 16.
Lucas Pires 2020, Chap. 5 in the present book.
- 17.
This was clearly reaffirmed by Commission President Juncker in his 2017 State of the Union speech for instance. Juncker 2017.
- 18.
Lucas Pires 2020, Chap. 2 in the present book.
- 19.
Lucas Pires 2020, Chap. 5 in the present book.
- 20.
Lucas Pires 2020, Chap. 5 in the present book.
- 21.
Suffice it to refer to the Treaty on Stability, Economic Coordination and Governance or the Treaty establishing the European Stability Mechanism.
- 22.
Only 42.61% of European citizens voted in the 2014 elections; the turnout has been steadily decreasing since the first direct elections in 1979. European Parliament, Results of the 2014 European elections—turnout, http://www.europarl.europa.eu/elections2014-results/en/turnout.html (11.11.2018).
- 23.
I refer here for instance to the issues linked to the informality of the Eurogroup, or the inadequacy of the European Parliament as the organ in charge of guaranteeing accountability of Eurozone- or Banking Union-specific issues.
- 24.
Recent initiatives have included for instance the proposal of an Erasmus programme for civil servants, the delivery of a free Interrail pass to EU citizens when they turn 18 or the Spitzenkandidaten procedure in the run-up to the European Parliament elections.
- 25.
Article 11-2 of the Statute of the European System of Central Banks attached to the Treaty of Maastricht.
- 26.
Article 11-2 of Protocol nº4 on the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and the European Central Bank.
- 27.
Article 26-3 Council Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 of 15 October 2013 conferring specific tasks on the European Central Bank concerning policies relating to the prudential supervision of credit institutions.
- 28.
Fromage and Ibrido 2018.
- 29.
Lucas Pires 2020, Chap. 5 in the present book.
- 30.
On the extension of these practices during the crisis especially: Fraccaroli et al. 2018.
- 31.
Amtenbrink and van Duin 2009, 468.
- 32.
Claeys et al. 2014, 7.
- 33.
Heidebrecht 2015, 511.
- 34.
Lucas Pires 2020, Chap. 5 in the present book.
- 35.
Amtenbrink and van Duin 2009, 578f.
- 36.
Belke 2017, p. 8.
- 37.
Fromage et al. 2019.
- 38.
Lucas Pires 2020, Chap. 5 in the present book.
- 39.
Lucas Pires 2020, Chap. 5 in the present book.
- 40.
Fromage and Ibrido 2018.
- 41.
Lucas Pires 2020, Chap. 5 in the present book.
- 42.
This intention was voiced by then-ECB President Mario Draghi in 2012. Draghi 2012.
- 43.
- 44.
Lucas Pires 2020, Chap. 5 in the present book.
- 45.
- 46.
Lucas Pires 2020, Chap. 2 in the present book.
- 47.
Fromage 2018.
- 48.
See on these proposals, inter alia Curtin and Fasone 2017.
- 49.
European Commission, Policy package on ‘Completing Europe's Economic and Monetary Union’, https://ec.europa.eu/info/publications/economy-finance/completing-europes-economic-and-monetary-union-policy-package_en.
- 50.
Lucas Pires 2020, Chap. 5 in the present book.
- 51.
This intervened by means of the introduction of the European Semester for instance.
- 52.
Inter alia Griglio and Lupo 2018.
- 53.
Lucas Pires 2020, Chap. 2 in the present book.
References
Amtenbrink F, Van Duin K (2009) The European Central Bank before the European Parliament: Theory and Practice After Ten Years of Monetary Dialogue. European Law Review 34: 561–583.
Belke A (2017) Central Bank Communication: Managing Expectations through the Monetary Dialogue. ROME Discussion Paper Series 17–04.
Claeys G et al. (2014) European Central Bank Accountability: How the Monetary Dialogue Could Evolve. Bruegel Policy Contribution 2014/04.
Committee for the study of Economic and Monetary Union (1989) Report on economic and monetary union in the European Community.
Curtin D, Fasone C (2017) Differentiated representation: is a flexible European Parliament desirable? In: de Witte B et al. (eds) Between flexibility and disintegration. The trajectory of differentiation in the EU. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp. 118–145.
Draghi M (2012) Speech by Mario Draghi at the Global Investment Conference in London, 26.7.2012, https://www.ecb.europa.eu/press/key/date/2012/html/sp120726.en.html (11.11.2018).
Eurobarometer (2017) Standard Eurobarometer 88, December 2017.
Eurobarometer (2018) Flash Eurobarometer 465, May 2018.
Fraccaroli N et al. (2018) The evolution of the ECB’s accountability practices during the crisis. ECB Economic Bulletin.
Fromage D (2015) Les Parlements dans l’Union Européenne après le Traité de Lisbonne. La Participation des Parlements allemands, britanniques, espagnols, français et italiens. L’Harmattan, Paris.
Fromage D (2018) The European Parliament in the post-crisis era: an institution empowered on paper only? In: Fromage D, van den Brink T (eds) Special issue on “National parliaments, the European Parliament and the democratic legitimation of the European Union economic governance”. Journal of European Integration. 40: 281–294.
Fromage D, Ibrido R (2018) The ‘Banking Dialogue’ as a model to improve parliamentary involvement in the Monetary Dialogue? In: Fromage D, van den Brink T (eds) Special issue on “National parliaments, the European Parliament and the democratic legitimation of the European Union economic governance”. Journal of European Integration. 40: 295–308.
Fromage D et al. (eds) (2019) Special issue on “The ECB’s accountability in a multilevel European order”. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law
Griglio E, Lupo N (2018) The conference on stability, economic coordination and governance: filling the gaps of parliamentary oversight in the EU. In: Fromage D, van den Brink T (eds) Special issue on “National parliaments, the European Parliament and the democratic legitimation of the European Union economic governance”. Journal of European Integration. 40: 358–373.
Hefftler C et al. (eds) (2015) The Palgrave handbook of national parliaments and the European Union. Palgrave Macmillan, New York.
Heidebrecht S (2015) Wie transparent ist die Europäische Zentralbank? Eine international vergleichende Betrachtung vor dem Hintergrund der weitreichenden Neuerungen zum Januar 2015. Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft. 25: 501–525.
Ingravallo I (2017) L’iniziativa dei cittadini europei a dieci anni da Lisbona. Luci e ombre. La Communità internazionale. 72: 241–253.
Jancic D (ed) (2017) National parliaments after the Lisbon treaty and the Euro crisis: resilience or resignation? Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Juncker J-Cl (2017) State of the Union Address 2017.
Karatzia A (2017) The European Citizens’ Initiative and the EU institutional balance: On realism and the possibilities of affecting EU lawmaking. Common Market Law Review. 54: 77–208.
Kreilinger V (2013) The new inter-parliamentary conference for economic and financial governance. Notre Europe Policy paper 100.
Lastra R M (1992) The independence of the European System of Central Banks. Harvard International Law Journal. 33: 475–520.
Monjal P-Y (2016) L’Union européenne comme fédéralisme exécutif autocratique par nature irresponsable. La « responsabilité » comme possible clé explicative de la nature juridico-politique de l’Union. In: Geslot Ch et al. (eds) La responsabilité politique des exécutifs des Etats membres. Bruylant, Brussels, pp. 25–40.
Petit C-A (2019) Balancing independence with accountability: A third-metre waltz? Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, pp. 17–34.
Roland S (2016) Un déficit démocratique peut en cacher un autre: la responsabilité politique du Conseil européen et du Conseil en question. In: Geslot Ch et al. (eds) La responsabilité politique des exécutifs des Etats membres. Bruylant, Brussels, pp. 219–239.
Tiburcio T (2015) The right to petition. Study for the PETI Committee of the European Parliament PE519.223.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 T.M.C. Asser Press and the authors
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fromage, D. (2020). Francisco Lucas Pires’ Views on the Economic and Monetary Union and the Single Currency: An Assessment Twenty Years Later. In: Lucas Pires, M., Pereira Coutinho, F. (eds) What Market, What Society, What Union?. T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-371-9_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-371-9_9
Published:
Publisher Name: T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague
Print ISBN: 978-94-6265-370-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-6265-371-9
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)