Skip to main content

Victims of Drone Warfare: Stretching the Boundaries of Conflict; Ethics and Remote Control Warfare

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Future of Drone Use

Part of the book series: Information Technology and Law Series ((ITLS,volume 27))

  • 4115 Accesses

Abstract

The growing use of (un)armed drones in warfare raises a number of concerns about the protection of civilians in armed conflict, international human rights law and the lowering of the threshold for using armed violence as a means of solving conflict. This chapter will highlight the practical and ethical challenges of drone use in conflict. This will be done by focusing on the proliferation of dual-use drone technology to state and non-state actors and implications for new ways of war. Furthermore, it will elaborate on how the changing nature of conflicts (e.g. intra-state, hybrid conflicts) and growing use of proxy wars through armed non-state actors, vis-a-vis lowered political support in the West, could see an increase in the risk-free use of armed drones and robots. We will also highlight the need for transparency and accountability when using armed drones. In particular, we discuss the issue of civilian casualties in the context of the War on Terror by providing testimony from those affected by drone strikes in Pakistan and Yemen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Amnesty International 2012; Stanford University and New York University 2012; Open Society Foundation 2014.

  2. 2.

    Human Rights Watch 2013, 2014; Open Society Foundation 2015; Al-Karama 2015.

  3. 3.

    See for example: The Bureau of Investigative Journalism 2015.

  4. 4.

    Philip 2013; Christoff Heyns 2014; Ben Emmerson 2014.

  5. 5.

    Kreps and Zenko 2014; Dworkin 2014; PAX 2012.

  6. 6.

    Sayler 2015.

  7. 7.

    Newswire 2012.

  8. 8.

    Zwijnenburg 2015.

  9. 9.

    Rawnsly 2015.

  10. 10.

    Kilcullen and Mcdonald 2009; Maguinnesss 2009.

  11. 11.

    Kreps and Kaag 2012.

  12. 12.

    Chamayou 2013, p. 172.

  13. 13.

    The Bureau of Investigative Journalism 2015.

  14. 14.

    Brennan 2011.

  15. 15.

    Obama 2013.

  16. 16.

    Koh 2010.

  17. 17.

    Friedersdorf 2013.

  18. 18.

    Strawser 2010; Gross 2014.

  19. 19.

    See for example: Miller 2013; Scahill and Greenwald 2014.

  20. 20.

    Ackermann 2015.

  21. 21.

    The Washington Post 2012.

  22. 22.

    Reuters 2012.

  23. 23.

    Register 2010.

  24. 24.

    Cloud 2010.

  25. 25.

    The New York Times 2012.

  26. 26.

    NBC News 2013.

  27. 27.

    Reprieve 2014.

  28. 28.

    Schwartz 2013.

  29. 29.

    Scirp 2012.

  30. 30.

    Stanford Law School and NYU School of Law 2012.

  31. 31.

    Stuhmiller 2008.

  32. 32.

    http://unsrct-drones.com/.

  33. 33.

    Emmerson 2014.

  34. 34.

    Blair 2011.

  35. 35.

    Mullen 2010.

  36. 36.

    Stanford Law School and NYU School of Law 2012, p. 85.

  37. 37.

    Stanford International Human Rights and Conflict Resolution Clinic (IHRCRC) and Global Justice Clinic (GJC) at NYU School of Law 2012, p. 82.

  38. 38.

    Stanford International Human Rights and Conflict Resolution Clinic (IHRCRC) and Global Justice Clinic (GJC) at NYU School of Law 2012, pp. 83–84.

  39. 39.

    Stanford International Human Rights and Conflict Resolution Clinic (IHRCRC) and Global Justice Clinic (GJC) at NYU School of Law 2012, p. 84.

  40. 40.

    Friedman 2011.

  41. 41.

    Beauchamp and Savulescu 2013.

  42. 42.

    Kreps and Kaag 2012, pp. 19–20.

  43. 43.

    Johnson 2013, p. 167.

  44. 44.

    Chamayou 2013, p. 146.

  45. 45.

    Hayes et al. 2014, p. 9.

  46. 46.

    Ibid.

  47. 47.

    Hayes et al. 2014, p. 9.

  48. 48.

    The Guardian 2013.

  49. 49.

    Kershner and Lyons 2014.

  50. 50.

    CNN 2012.

  51. 51.

    Dorrie 2014.

  52. 52.

    Easton and Hsiao 2013.

  53. 53.

    The Aviationist 2013.

  54. 54.

    Wong 2013.

  55. 55.

    Want China Times 2014.

  56. 56.

    The Missile Technology Control Regime and the Wassenaar Arrangement are two arms export control mechanisms.

  57. 57.

    Arthur 2014.

  58. 58.

    Reid 2014.

  59. 59.

    Sherwood 2013.

  60. 60.

    Hennigan 2012.

  61. 61.

    O’Gorman and Abbot 2013.

  62. 62.

    The Telegraph 2012a.

  63. 63.

    YNet News 2013.

  64. 64.

    Zwijnenburg 2015.

  65. 65.

    Miasnikov 2005.

  66. 66.

    European Union 2015.

  67. 67.

    Wassenaar Arrangement 2015.

  68. 68.

    Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) 2013.

  69. 69.

    Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) 2013, Article 5.

  70. 70.

    Hegre et al. 2014; Human Security Group 2012.

  71. 71.

    .

    Schondorf 2005, p. 3.

  72. 72.

    PEW 2015.

  73. 73.

    Schondorf 2005.

  74. 74.

    The Bureau of Investigative Journalism 2015.

  75. 75.

    The Telegraph 2012b.

  76. 76.

    Emmerson 2012, p. 12.

  77. 77.

    Chamayou 2013, p. 147.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wim Zwijnenburg .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 T.M.C. Asser press and the authors

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zwijnenburg, W., Blok, Z. (2016). Victims of Drone Warfare: Stretching the Boundaries of Conflict; Ethics and Remote Control Warfare. In: Custers, B. (eds) The Future of Drone Use. Information Technology and Law Series, vol 27. T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-132-6_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-132-6_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-6265-131-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-6265-132-6

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Societies and partnerships