Abstract
To understand the idea of constructivism and the power of pre-existing knowledge, consider trying to convince a child who believes the Earth is flat (this is called a misconception or alternative conception) that it is actually round.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Applefield, J. M., Huber, M., & Moallem, M. (2001). Constructivism in theory and practice: Toward a better understanding. The High School Journal, 84(2), 35-53.
Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Duit, R., & Treagust, D. F. (2003). Conceptual change: A powerful framework for improving science teaching and learning. International journal of science education, 25(6), 671-688.
Gordon, M. (2009). Toward a pragmatic discourse of constructivism: Reflections on lessons from practice. Educational Studies, 45(1), 39-58.
Matthews, M. (Ed.). (1998). Constructivism in science education: A philosophical approach. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
Tabachnick, B. R., & Zeichner, K. M. (1999). Idea and action: Action research and the development of conceptual change teaching of science. Science education, 83(3), 309-322.
Woolfolk, A. (2011). Educational psychology (11th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Sense Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
McComas, W.F. (2014). Constructivism. In: McComas, W.F. (eds) The Language of Science Education. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-497-0_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-497-0_19
Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam
Online ISBN: 978-94-6209-497-0
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)