Skip to main content

Domingo de Soto

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy
  • 83 Accesses

Abstract

Domingo de Soto (1494–1560) was a sixteenth-century Paris-trained Spanish theologian. He is seldom remembered now, but his work was instrumental in the Thomistic revival of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. His philosophical influence was most significant in three areas. First and foremost were his contributions to the development of Thomistic natural law, especially concerning the development of individual, subjective rights within a natural law moral and legal framework. Second was his recognition that objects in free fall accelerate uniformly, which has been shown to have influenced Galileo’s thinking about free fall. Third was his infusing the logic of terms and propositions with sign theory, which was an important step to the development of semiotics and the logic of ideas, which subsumed logic to epistemology and dominated logical theorizing for nearly 300 years.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 999.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 849.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliography

Primary Sources

  • Arnauld, A., & Nicole P. (1996). Logic or the Art of thinking (trans: Buroker, J. V.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgersdijk, F. (1651). Institutionum logicarum libri duo. Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conimbricensis. (1976). Commentarii Conimbricensis in dialecticam Aristotelis. Hildesheim: Olms. (Facsimile reprint of Cologne, 1607).

    Google Scholar 

  • de Soto, D. (1545). Super VIII Libros Physicorum Aristotelis commentaria. Salmanca.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Soto, D. (1556). De justitia et jure. Salamanca.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Soto, D. (1965). Fratris Dominici Soto … ad sanctum concilium Tridentinum De natura & gratia. Paris: J. Foucher.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Soto, D. (1967a). In Porphyrii Isagogen, Aristotelis Categorias, librosque de demonstratione, commentaria. Frankfurt: Minerva. (Facsimile reprint of Venice, 1574).

    Google Scholar 

  • de Soto, D. (1967b). De justitia et jure libri decem; De la justicia y del derecho en diez libros (trans: Carro, V. D.). Madrid: Insituto de Estudios Politicos.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Soto, D. (1980). In W. Risse (Ed.), Summulae. Hildesheim: Olms. (Facsimile reprint of Salamanca, 1554).

    Google Scholar 

  • Keckermann, B. (1606). Gymnasium logicum. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, J. (1975). In P. Nidditch (Ed.), An essay concerning human understanding. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peter of Spain. (1972). Tractatus (ed.: de Rijk, L. M.). Assen: Van Gorcum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poinsot, J. (John of St. Thomas). (1985). Tractatus de signis: The semiotic of John Poinsot (trans: Deeley, J.). Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smiglecki, M. (1658). Logica. Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

Secondary Sources

  • Alves, A. A., & Manuel Moreira, J. (2010). The Salamanca school. New York: Continuum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alves, A. A., & Moreira, J. M. (2013). Virtue and commerce in Domingo de Soto’s thought: Commercial practices, character, and the common good. Journal of Business Ethics, 113, 627–638.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashworth, E. J. (1978). Multiple quantification and the use of special quantifiers in early sixteenth century logic. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 19, 599–613.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashworth, E. J. (1990a). Domingo de Soto (1494–1560) and the doctrine of signs. In G. L. Bursill-Hall, S. Ebbesen, & K. Koerner (Eds.), De ortu grammaticae: Studies in medieval grammar and linguistic theory in memory of Jan Pinborg (pp. 35–48). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashworth, E. J. (1990b). The doctrine of signs in some early sixteenth-century Spanish logicians. In I. Angelelli & A. d’Ors (Eds.), Estudios de historia de la Lógica: Actas del II Simposio de Historia de la Lógica (pp. 13–38). Pamplona: Eunate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashworth, E. J. (1995). Suárez on the analogy of being: Some historical background. Vivarium, 33, 50–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashworth, E. J. (2008). Developments in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries. In D. M. Gabbay & J. Woods (Eds.), Handbook of the history of logic: Medieval and renaissance logic (pp. 609–644). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beltran de Heredia, V. (1961). Domingo de Soto: estudio biografico documentado. Madrid: Cultura Hispanica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beuchot, M. (1980). La doctrina Thomista clasica sobre el signo: Domingo de Soto, Francisco de Araujo y Juan de Santo Tomas. Critica: Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofia, 12, 39–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beuchot, M. (1984). El problema de los universales en Domingo de Soto y Alonso de la Veracruz. Revista de Filosofia, 17, 249–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beuchot, M. (1988). Un libro de texto para la Nueva Espana: La Logica de Domingo de Soto. Revista de Filosofia, 21, 152–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brett, A. (1997). Liberty, right and nature: Individual rights in later scholastic thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brett, A. (2006a). Scholastic political thought and the modern concept of the state. In A. Brett., and Tully, J. with Hamilton-Bleakley, H. (Eds.), Rethinking the foundations of modern political thought (pp. 130–148). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brett A., and Tully, J. with Hamilton-Bleakley, H. (Eds.). (2006b). Rethinking the foundations of modern political thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brett, A. (2011). Changes of state: Nature and the limits of the city in early modern natural law. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brett, A. (2014). Later scholastic philosophy of law. In F. D. Miller & C.-A. Biondi (Eds.), A treatise of legal philosophy and general jurisprudence, vol. 6: A history of the philosophy of law from the ancient Greeks to the scholastics (pp. 335–375). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brufau Prats, J. (1960). El pensamiento politico de Domingo de Soto y su concepcion del poder. Salamanca: Universidad de Salamanca.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camacho, P., José, J., & Lucia, I. S. (1994). Domingo de Soto en el Origen de la ciencia moderna. Revista de Filosofia, 7, 455–475.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casado, Á. M. (Ed.). (2006). Domingo de Soto: La causa de los pobres. Salamanca: Editorial San Esteban.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chafuen, A. (2003). Faith and liberty: The economic thought of the late scholastics. Lanham: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruz, C., & Juan, e. (2007). La ley natural como fundamento moral y juridico en Domingo de Soto. Pamplona: Universidad de Navarra.

    Google Scholar 

  • di Liso, S. (2000a). Domingo de Soto: dalla logica alla scienza. Levante: Bari.

    Google Scholar 

  • di Liso, S. (2000b). La dialettica dei termini nelle Summulae di Domingo de Soto. Studi Filosofici, 23, 39–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • di Liso, S. (2006). Domingo de Soto: Ciencia y filosofia de la naturaleza. Pamplona: Universidad de Navarra.

    Google Scholar 

  • di Liso, S. (2007). Domingo de Soto su massimo e minimo, continuo e infinito. Rivista di Storia della Filosofia, 62, 647–675.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duhem, P. (1955). Les précurseurs parisiens de Galilée: Dominique Soto et la scolastique parisienne. In id., Études sur Léonard de Vinci. Paris: A Hermann (Reprint of Paris: F. de Nobele 1906–1913).

    Google Scholar 

  • Duhem, P. (1990). Research on the history of physical theories (trans: Ariew, R.). Synthese 83: 189–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elegiod, J. M. (2009). The just price: Three insights from the Salamanca school. Journal of Business Ethics, 90, 29–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernández Álvarez, Á. M. (2014). The institutional evolution of property and subjective rights in XVI and XVII centuries in Spain. Esic: Market Economics and Business Journal, 45, 327–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaetano, S. (2015). Fides quare per charitatem operator: A study and translation of Domingo de Soto’s De natura et gratia. PhD diss., Notre Dame University, 2015 (ProQuest Dissertations Publishing, 2015. 3746493).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordley, J. (1991). The philosophical origins of modern contract doctrine. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grice-Hutchinson, M. (1952). The School of Salmanaca: Readings in Spanish monetary theory 1544–1605. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, B. (1963). Political thought in sixteenth-century Spain: A study of the political ideas of Victoria, de Soto, Suárez, and Molina. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernández, R. (1991). The internationalization of Francisco de Vitoria and Domingo de Soto. Fordham International Law Journal, 15, 1031–1059.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, B. (2018). Domingo de Soto. In R. Domingo & J. Martínez-Torrón (Eds.), Great Christian Jurists in Spanish History (Law and Christianity, pp. 134–156). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108624732.008.

  • Jimenez Castano, D. (2015). Domingo de Soto. In A. P. Gonzalez (Ed.), La Escuela de Salmanca (pp. 163–222). Madrid: Verbum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramos-Lisson, D. (1976). Le ley segun Domingo de Soto. Pamplona: Eunsa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sylla, E. D. (2008). The origin and fate of Thomas Bradwardine’s De proportionibus velocitatum in motibus in relation to the history of mathematics. In W. R. Laird & S. Roux (Eds.), Mechanics and natural philosophy before the scientific revolution (pp. 67–120). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tellkamp, J. A. (2004). Esclavitud, dominio y libertad humana segun Domingo de Soto. Revista Espanola de Filosofia Medieval, 11, 129–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, W. (1987). The early Jesuits and the heritage of Domingo de Soto. History and Technology, 4, 301–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, W. (1990). Duhem and Koyré on Domingo de Soto. Synthese, 83, 239–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, W. (1997). Domingo de Soto and the Iberian roots of Galileo’s science. In K. White (Ed.), Hispanic philosophy in the age of discovery (pp. 113–129). Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, W. (2004). Domingo de Soto and the early Galileo. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, K. (Ed.). (1997). Hispanic philosophy in the age of discovery. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benjamin Hill .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature B.V.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Hill, B. (2020). Domingo de Soto. In: Lagerlund, H. (eds) Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1665-7_146

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics