Skip to main content

Causality

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy
  • 85 Accesses

Abstract

Modern philosophical accounts of causality deviate dramatically from medieval accounts, yet many of the views held in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries represent the end of an evolutionary process that began in the thirteenth century with the reintroduction of Aristotelian natural philosophy to medieval authors. The entry traces the evolution from premodern to modern views, explaining the transition that occurred from early medieval authors through late medieval scholastics. The crucial turning point is the tendency to distinguish explanatory principles from causes properly conceived. That tendency in turn corresponds to a critique of final causes in nature. The crucial change that occurred in the seventeenth century, however, was due less to a change in causal conceptions and more to implications of mechanical philosophy for commonsense inferences about nature and causal relations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 999.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 849.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliography

Primary Sources

  • Albert the Great. (1890). Physicorum libri. In A. Borgnet (Ed.), Opera omnia (Vol. 3). Paris: Ludovicus Vivès.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albert the Great. (1971). De caelo et mundo. In B. Geyer (Ed.), Opera omnia (Vol. 5). Münster: Aschendorff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albert the Great. (1987–1993). Physica. Pars I. Libri 1–4, Pars II. Libri 5–8 (ed.: Hossfeld, P.). Münster: Aschendorf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anselm of Canterbury. (1998). The major works (ed. and trans: Davies, B., Evans, G. R.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. (1939). On the heavens (trans: Guthrie, W. K. C.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. (1941a). Analytica posteriora (trans: Mure, G. R. G.). In R. McKeon (Ed.), The basic works of Aristotle. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. (1941b). Metaphysica (trans: Ross, W. D.). In R. McKeon (Ed.), The basic works of Aristotle. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. (1957–1990). Physica. In Aristoteles Latinus (Vol. 7). Translatio Vetus, ed.: Bossier, F., Brams, J.; Translatio Vaticana, ed.: Mansion, A. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. (1968–1970). Physics, 2 vols (trans: Wickstead, P. H., Cornford, F. M.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriugena, J. S. (1987). Periphyseon (trans: Williams, I. S., O’Meara, J.). Montreal: Bellarmin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, A. (1963a). Commentary on Aristotle’s Physics (trans: Blackwell, R., et al.). New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, A. (1963b). Exposition of Aristotle’s treatise on the heavens, books I–III, 2 vols (trans: Larcher, R., Conway, P.). College of St. Columbus: Mary of the Springs.

    Google Scholar 

  • William of Ockham. (1985). Expositio in octo libros Physicorum. Opera philosophica (Vol. 4, ed.: Richter, V., Leibold, G.); (Vol. 5, ed.: Wood, R., et al.). St. Bonaventure: The Franciscan Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • William of Ockham. (2007). Demonstration and scientific knowledge (trans: Longeway, J.). Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame.

    Google Scholar 

Secondary Sources

  • Adams, M. (1987). William Ockham (Vol. 2). Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodnár, I. (1997). Movers and elemental motions in Aristotle. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 15, 81–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bos, E. P., & Meijer, P. A. (Eds.). (1992). On Proclus and his influence in medieval philosophy. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fakhry, M. (1958). Islamic occasionalism and its critique by Averroes and Aquinas. London: Unwin and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falcon, A. (2005). Aristotle and the uniformity of nature: Unity without uniformity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Funkenstein, A. (1965). Heilsplan und natürliche Entwicklung. Munich: Nymphenburger Verlagshandlung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goddu, A. (1981). The contribution of Albertus Magnus to discussions of natural and violent motions. In: Albert der Grosse, Seine Zeit, Sein Werk, Seine Wirkung. Miscellanea Mediaevalia (Vol. 14, pp. 116–125). Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goddu, A. (1984). The physics of William of Ockham. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goddu, A. (1999). Ockham’s philosophy of nature. In P. Spade (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Ockham (pp. 143–167). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lennox, J. (1986). Aristotle, Galileo, and mixed sciences. In W. Wallace (Ed.), Reinterpreting Galileo (pp. 29–51). Washington, DC: The Catholic University Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longeway, J. (2007). Introduction. In William of Ockham (Ed.), Demonstration and scientific knowledge in William of Ockham (pp. 1–140). Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markus, R. A. (Ed.). (1972). Augustine: A collection of critical essays. Garden City: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marmura, M. (1965). Ghazali and demonstrative science. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 3, 183–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, G. (Ed.). (1999). The Augustinian tradition. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDowell, J., & Williams, T. (2003). In search of certainty. Wheaton: Tyndale House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran, D. (1989). The philosophy of John Scottus Eriugena, a study of idealism in the middle ages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noone, T. (1999). The Franciscans and epistemology: Reflections on the roles of Bonaventure and Scotus. In R. Houser (Ed.), Medieval masters, essays in honor of Msgr (pp. 63–90). Houston: E. A. Synan. University of St. Thomas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmieri, P. (2008). Reenacting Galileo’s experiments. Rediscovering the techniques of seventeenth-century science. Lewiston: The Edwin Mellen Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, R. (1963). Causation. The Monist, 47, 287–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thijssen, J. M. M. H. (1987). John Buridan and Nicholas of Autrecourt on causality and induction. Traditio, 43, 237–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisheipl, J. (Ed.). (1980). Albertus Magnus and the sciences: Commemorative essays 1980. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisheipl, J. (1985). In W. Carroll (Ed.), Nature and motion in the middle ages. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to André Goddu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature B.V.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Goddu, A. (2020). Causality. In: Lagerlund, H. (eds) Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1665-7_118

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics