Abstract
From the mid-2000s, social networking services (SNSs) exploded in popularity around the world. This growth can partly be attributed to the availability of the broadband internet (technical networks) and partly to a collective desire for connection in human relationships (social networks). But how did computer networks become social? Even before the growth of SNSs, networks were in the popular imagination and in the academic literature. This chapter looks at three ways that networks were conceptualized: social network analysis (SNA), network society (NS), and actor–network theory (ANT). SNS designers were influenced by previously marginal social science approaches that theorized relationships as social networks. In network conceptions of society, complexity and scale emerge from webs of connections. SNSs mediated and captured the wider transformative power of social and technical networks. The tradition of SNA maps associations between individuals and groups to reveal how networks help constitute the self and generate wider social patterns. The second approach, associated with Manuel Castells’ influential sociological reading of networks, is the theory of the network society, which identifies a global transition from hierarchies and territories to flows across economic and cultural networks. SNSs follow many trends Castells identified – timeless time and spaces of flows. A third influential network tradition that relates to the rise of SNSs is ANT, which emerged from social studies of technology in the 1980s. It critiques the conventional split in social criticism between the technological and the human, insisting that both human and nonhuman actors have agency and form networks of relations. SNSs can best be understood as mixing the agency of technical actors (computers, software, databases, and interfaces) and human actors (designers, users, and “friends”) into sociotechnical networks.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abbate J (1999) Inventing the Internet. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Austin JL (1975) How to do things with words. Oxford University Press
Barabási A-L (2003) Linked: how everything is connected to everything else and what it means for business, science, and everyday life. Plume, New York
boyd d (2004) Friendster and publicly articulated social networks. Paper presented at the conference on human factors and computing systems (CHI 2004), ACM
boyd d m, Ellison NB (2007) Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship. J Comput-Mediat Commun 13:210–230
Buchanan M (2003) Nexus: small worlds and the groundbreaking theory of networks. W. W. Norton and Company, New York
Callon M (1980) Struggles and negotiations to decide what is problematic and what is not: the socio-logics of translation. In: Knorr-Cetina KD, Krohn R (eds) The social process of scientific investigation. D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, pp 197–220
Castells M (1996) The rise of the network society. Blackwell Publishers, Cambridge, MA
Castells M (1997) The power of identity. Blackwell, Malden, MA
Castells M (2000) End of millennium. Blackwell, Oxford
Freeman LC (2004) The development of social network analysis: a study in the sociology of science. Empirical Press/BookSurge, Vancouver/North Charleston
Fuchs C (2014) Social media: a critical introduction. Sage, London
Goffman E, Lemert CC, Branaman A (1997) The Goffman reader. Blackwell, Cambridge, MA
Granovetter MS (1973) The strength of weak ties. Am J Sociol 78:1360
Granovetter MS (1983) The strength of weak ties: a network theory revisited. Sociol Theory 1:201–233
Haimson OL, Hoffmann AL (2016) Constructing and enforcing “authentic” identity online: Facebook, real names, and non-normative identities. First Monday 21(6)
Hassan R, Purser RE (2007) 24/7: time and temporality in the network society. Stanford Business Books, Stanford
Heidegger M, Stambaugh J (1996) Being and time: a translation of Sein und Zeit. State University of New York Press, Albany
Johnson S (2002) Emergence: the connected lives of ants, brains, cities, and software. Scribner, New York
Jordan K, Hauser J, Foster S (2003) The augmented social network: building identity and trust into the next-generation Internet. First Monday 8
Knox H, Savage M, Harvey P (2006) Social networks and the study of relations: networks as method, metaphor and form. Econ Soc 35:113–140
Kramer ADI, Guillory JE, Hancock JT (2014) Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci 111(24):8788–8790. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1320040111
Lally E (2002) At home with computers. Berg, Oxford/New York
Latour B (2005) Reassembling the social: an introduction to actor-network-theory. Clarendon, Oxford
Ling R, Yttri B (2002) Hyper-coordination via mobile phones in Norway. In: Perpetual contact: mobile communication, private talk, public performance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 139–169
Marineau R (1989) Jacob Levy Moreno, 1889–1974: father of psychodrama, sociometry, and group psychotherapy. Tavistock/Routledge, London/New York
Moreno JL (1953) Who shall survive?: Foundations of sociometry, group psychotherapy and sociodrama (Rev. ed.). Bacon House, Beacon
Newman MEJ, Barabási A-L, Watts DJ (2006) The structure and dynamics of networks. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Perez J (2008) When Facebook updates go horribly wrong, Live News. Macquarie Media Network Pty Limited
Reichelt L (2007) Ambient intimacy. Disambiguity http://www.disambiguity.com/ambient-intimacy/
Rogers EM (1962) Diffusion of innovations. New York, Free Press of Glencoe
Schwanen T, Kwan MP (2008) The internet, mobile phone and space-time constraints. Geoforum 39(3):1362–1377
Shaviro S (2003) Connected, or, what it means to live in the network society. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis
Six Degrees (1999) www.sixdegrees.com
Tkach-Kawasaki L (2003) Internet in East Asia. Encyclopedia of community, pp 794–798
TouchGraph (2008) TouchGraph | company overview. TouchGraph, LLC, Hoboken
Wark M (1994) Virtual geography: living with global media events. Indiana University Press, Bloomington
Watts DJ (1999) Small worlds: the dynamics of networks between order and randomness. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Watts DJ (2003) Six degrees: the science of a connected age, 1st edn. Norton, New York
Weinberger D (2002) Small pieces loosely joined: a unified theory of the web. Perseus, Cambridge, MA
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Crown
About this entry
Cite this entry
Chesher, C. (2018). How Computer Networks Became Social. In: Hunsinger, J., Klastrup, L., Allen, M. (eds) Second International Handbook of Internet Research. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1202-4_4-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1202-4_4-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-024-1202-4
Online ISBN: 978-94-024-1202-4
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Biomedicine and Life SciencesReference Module Biomedical and Life Sciences