Abstract
Since the late 1990s, researchers have been investigating into the ethical issues of Internet research. Among the first works, AoIR Research Ethics Recommendations of 2002 can be mentioned. Internet research ethics issues are still compelling, especially about social media, that are consolidated fields of research but with ethical open questions that will be more and more complex in the future.
The chapter will go through these questions, focusing on selected keywords and summarizing for each one the debate, holes, and challenges for the future.
The chapter will begin with a definition of the key terms, such as Internet research ethics, social media, and social network sites, as an important step for assessing the ethical issues around social media research. The chapter will then address traditional issues about ethics, like privacy, informed consent, anonymization, Institutional Review Board, and traceability, and then it will focus on new topics, like Big Data, data storage and retrieval, and crowdsourcing work. Besides the specific issues, also broader approaches to privacy will be presented, such as the ones of distributed morality and distributed responsibility, as framework under which build a dialogue between the many actors involved (researchers, companies, users, data, algorithms, programmers).
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Acquisti A, Gross R (2009) Predicting social security numbers from public data. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106(27):10975–10980. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0904891106
Beaulieu A (2004) Mediating ethnography: objectivity and the making of ethnographies of the internet. Soc Epistemol 18(2–3):139–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/0269172042000249264
Beaulieu A, Estalella A (2012) Rethinking research ethics for mediated settings. Inf Commun Soc 15(1):23–42
Berman G, Albright K (2017) Children and the data cycle: rights and ethics in a big data world. In: Innocenti working paper 2017-05. UNICEF Office of Research, Florence
boyd d (2010) Social network sites as networked publics: affordances, dynamics, and implications. In: Papacharissi Z (ed) Networked self: identity, community, and culture on social network sites. Routledge, New York, pp 39–58
boyd d (2016) Untangling research and practice: What Facebook’s “emotional contagion” study teaches us, Research Ethics. Vol. 12(1):4–13
boyd d, Crawford K (2012) Critical questions for big data. Inf Commun Soc 15(5):662–679
Bruckman A (2002) Studying the amateur artist: a perspective on disguising data collected in human subjects research on the internet. Ethics Inf Technol 4(3):217–231
Buchanan E (2010) Internet research ethics: past, present, future. In: C. Ess and M. Consalvo, (eds) The Blackwell Handbook of Internet Studies, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp 83–108
Buchanan E (2017) Internet research ethics. Twenty years later. In: Zimmer M, Kinder-Kurlanda K (eds) Internet research ethics for the social age. New challenges, cases, and contexts. Peter Lang, New York, pp xxix–xxxiii
Buchanan EA, Ess C (2008) Internet research ethics: the field and its critical Issues. In: H.Tavani and K. E. Himma (eds) The Handbook of Information and Computer Ethics, Boston: Wiley, pp 273–292
Buchanan EA, Ess C (2009) Internet research ethics and the institutional review board: current practices and issues. Comput Soc 39(3):43–49
Buchanan EA, Zimmer M (2016) Internet Research Ethics. In: Zalta EN (ed) The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Winter 2016 edn). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/ethics-internet-research/. Accessed 26 Oct 2017
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (2014) Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, and Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans, December 2014. http://www.pre.ethics.gc.ca/pdf/eng/tcps2-2014/TCPS_2_FINAL_Web.pdf. Accessed 22 July 2018
De Bruin B, Floridi L (2017) The ethics of cloud computing. Sci Eng Ethics 23:21–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-016-9759-0.
Ellison NB, boyd d (2013) Sociality through social network sites. In: Dutton WH (ed) The Oxford handbook of internet studies. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 151–172. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199589074.013.0008
Ess C (2013) Digital media ethics, 2nd edn. Polity Press, Cambridge
Ess C (2017) Foreword. Grounding internet research ethics 3.0: a view from (the) AoIR. In: Zimmer M, Kinder-Kurlanda K (eds) Internet research ethics for the social age. New challenges, cases, and contexts. Peter Lang, New York, pp ix–xv
Ess C, the AOIR Ethics Working Committee (2002) Ethical decision-making and internet research: recommendations from the AoIR ethics working committee. Available: www.aoir.org/reports/ethics.pdf. Accessed 10 Oct 2017
Eysenbach G, Till JE (2001) Ethical issues in qualitative research on internet communities. BMJ 323(7321):1103–1105. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.323.7321.1103
Flick C (2016) Informed consent and the Facebook emotional manipulation study. Res Ethics 12(1):14–28
Floridi L (2013) Distributed morality in an information society. Sci Eng Ethics 19:727–743. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-012-9413-4
Frankel MS, Siang S (1999) Ethical and legal aspects of human subjects research in cyberspace. Report of the workshop held in Washington, DC on June 10–11, 1999. Retrieved from http://www.aaas.org/spp/sfrl/projects/intres/report.pdf. Accessed 26 Oct 2017
Garfinkel S, Cox D (2009) Finding and archiving the internet footprint. In: Paper, presented at the first digital lives research conference: personal digital archives for the 21st century, London, 9–11 Feb 2009
Giglietto F, Rossi L (2012) Ethics and interdisciplinarity in computational social science. Methodol Innov 7(1):25–36. https://doi.org/10.4256/mio.2012.003
Hård af Segerstad Y, Kasperowski D, Kleinberg C, Howes C (2017) Studying closed communities on-line. Digital methods and ethical considerations beyond informed consent and anonymity. In: Zimmer M, Kinder-Kurlanda K (eds) Internet research ethics for the social age. New challenges, cases, and contexts. Peter Lang, New York, pp 213–225
Highfield T, Leaver T (2016) Instagrammatics and digital methods: studying visual social media, from selfies and GIFs to memes and emoji. Commun Res Pract 2:47–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/22041451.2016.1155332
Hookway N (2008) Entering the blogosphere: Some strategies for using blogs in social research. Qual Res 8(1):91–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794107085298
Hutchinson J, Martin F, Sinpeng M (2017) Chasing ISIS. Network power, distributed ethics and responsible social media research. In: Zimmer M, Kinder-Kurlanda K (eds) Internet research ethics for the social age. New challenges, cases, and contexts. Peter Lang, New York, pp 58–71
Kaplan A, Haenlein M (2010) Users of the world unite: the challenges and opportunities of social media. Bus Horizons 53(1):59–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003
Kitchin R (2017) Big data – hype or revolution? In: Sloan L, Quan-Haase A (eds) The SAGE handbook of social media research methods. Sage/Credo Reference, Los Angeles, pp 27–39
Kramer ADI, Guillory JE, Hancock JT (2014) Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci 111(24):8788–8790. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1320040111
Leaver T (2015) Researching the ends of identity: birth and death on social media. Social Media + Society 1(1):205630511557887. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115578877
Livingstone S, Locatelli E (2012) Ethical dilemmas in qualitative research with youth on/offline. Int J Learn Med 4:67–75. https://doi.org/10.1162/ijlm_a_00096
Locatelli E (2017) Images of breastfeeding on Instagram: self-representation, publicness, and privacy management. Social Media + Society 3(2):205630511770719. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117707190
Luka ME, Millette M, Wallace J (2017) A feminist perspective on ethical digital methods. In: Zimmer M, Kinder-Kurlanda K (eds) Internet research ethics for the social age. New challenges, cases, and contexts. Peter Lang, New York, pp 22–36
Madden M, Fox S, Smith A, Vitak J (2007) Online identity and management and search in the age of transparency. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/~/media//Files/Reports/2007/PIP_Digital_Footprints.pdf.pdf. Accessed 10 Oct 2017
Markham AN (2012) Fabrication as ethical practice: qualitative inquiry in ambiguous internet contexts. Inf Commun Soc 15(3):334–353
Markham A, Buchanan E (2012) Ethical decision-making and internet research recommendations from the AoIR ethics working committee (Version 2.0). Retrieved from http://aoir.org/reports/ethics2.pdf. Accessed 10 Oct 2017
Matzner T, Ochs C (2017) Sorting things out ethically. Privacy as a research issue beyond the individual. In: Zimmer M, Kinder-Kurlanda K (eds) Internet research ethics for the social age. New challenges, cases, and contexts. Peter Lang, New York, pp 40–52
McCay-Peet L, Quan-Haase A (2017) What is social media and what questions can social media research help us answer? In: Sloan L, Quan-Haase A (eds) The SAGE handbook of social media research methods. Sage/Credo Reference, Los Angeles, pp 13–26
Mukherjee I (2017) The social age of “It’s not a private problem”. Case study of ethical and privacy concerns in a digital ethnography of south Asian blogs against intimate partner violence. In: Zimmer M, Kinder-Kurlanda K (eds) Internet research ethics for the social age. New challenges, cases, and contexts. Peter Lang, New York, pp 203–212
Nissenbaum H (2010) Privacy in context: technology, policy, and the integrity of social life. Stanford University Press, Stanford
Pittman M, Sheenan K (2017) Ethics of using online commercial crowdsourcing sites for academic research. The case of Amazon’s Mechanical Turk. In: Zimmer M, Kinder-Kurlanda K (eds) Internet research ethics for the social age. New challenges, cases, and contexts. Peter Lang, New York, pp 177–184
Poor N, Davidson R (2018) Case Study: The Ethics of Using Hacked Data: Patreon’s Data Hack and Academic Data Standards. Council for Big Data, Ethics, and Society. Accessed July 22, 2018. https://bdes.datasociety.net/council-output/case-study-the-ethics-of-using-hacked-data-patreons-data-hack-and-academic-data-standards/
Pushmann C (2017) Bad judgement, bad ethics? Validity in computational social media research. In: Zimmer M, Kinder-Kurlanda K (eds) Internet research ethics for the social age. New challenges, cases, and contexts. Peter Lang, New York, pp 96–113
Robson J (2017) Participant anonymity and participant observation. Situating the researcher within digital ethnography. In: Zimmer M, Kinder-Kurlanda K (eds) Internet research ethics for the social age. New challenges, cases, and contexts. Peter Lang, New York, pp 196–201
Seko Y, Lewis SP (2017) “We tend to err on the side of caution”. Ethical challenges facing Canadian research ethics boards when overseeing internet research. In: Zimmer M, Kinder-Kurlanda K (eds) Internet research ethics for the social age. New challenges, cases, and contexts. Peter Lang, New York, pp 133–147
Shank DB (2016) Using crowdsourcing websites for sociological research: the case of amazon mechanical turk. Am Sociol 47(1):47–55
Sloan L, Quan-Haase A (2017) A retrospective on state of the art social media research methods: ethical decisions, big-small data rivalries and the spectre of the 6Vs. In: Sloan L, Quan-Haase A (eds) The SAGE handbook of social media research methods. Sage/Credo Reference, Los Angeles, pp 662–672
Thomson SD (2016) Preserving Social Media. DPC Technology watch report 16-01 February 2016. https://doi.org/10.7207/twr16-01
Vayena E, Salathé M, Madoff l C, Brownstein JS (2015) Ethical challenges of big data in public health. PLoS Comput Biol 11(2):e1003904. https://doi.org/10.1371/journail.pcbi.1003904
Walther JB (2002) Research ethics in internet-enabled research: human subjects issues and methodological myopia. Ethics Inf Technol 4:205–216
Weller K, Kinder-Kurlanda K (2017) To share or not to share? Ethical challenges in sharing social media-based research. In: Zimmer M, Kinder-Kurlanda K (eds) Internet research ethics for the social age. New challenges, cases, and contexts. Peter Lang, New York, pp 115–129
Whiteman N (2012) Undoing ethics. Rethinking practice in online research. Springer, New York
Zimmer M (2010) “But the data is already public”: on the ethics of research in Facebook. Ethics Inf Technol 12:313–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-010-9227-5
Zook M, Barocas S, boyd d, Crawford K, Keller E, Gangadharan SP, Goodman A, Hollander R, Koenig BA, Metcalf J, Narayanan J, Nelson A, Pasquale F (2017) Ten simple rules for responsible big data research. PLOS Comput Biol 13(3):e1005399. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005399
Zwitter A (2014) Big data ethics. Big Data Soc 1:1–6
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature
About this entry
Cite this entry
Locatelli, E. (2018). Ethics of Social Media Research: State of the Debate and Future Challenges. In: Hunsinger, J., Klastrup, L., Allen, M. (eds) Second International Handbook of Internet Research. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1202-4_25-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1202-4_25-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-024-1202-4
Online ISBN: 978-94-024-1202-4
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Biomedicine and Life SciencesReference Module Biomedical and Life Sciences