Abstract
Medieval Latin optics had its sources in Greek and Arab thinkers, including Aristotle, Euclid, Ptolemy, Galen, al-Kindi, Avicenna, and Alhacen. Its prominent scholars had been Robert Grosseteste, Albert the Great, Roger Bacon, John Pecham, Witelo, and Theodoric of Freiburg. The medieval Latins discussed light’s ontological status and whether its mode of existence in the medium is spiritual or material. They adopted from Alhacen the model of radiation from individual point-sources and the idea of spherical propagation, thereby opening their account to radial analysis. Grosseteste identified light with the first corporeal form, which inserts dimensions onto matter, and Bacon developed the theory of multiplication of species, of which the activity of light was the observable instance. Light thus became the key to the workings of natural causality. The perspectivists formulated optical laws and applied them in explanations of natural phenomena such as the rainbow, pinhole images, and in their account of sight. They debated about the direction of the visual cone and subjected the eye to geometrical analysis. They explained sight as caused by the perpendicular species, since they are the shortest and therefore the strongest. Upon entering the eye, perpendicular rays pass through the cornea, refract at the rear surface of the crystalline lens, and project through the opening of the optic nerve. Sight perceives light and color directly, and twenty more visual qualities through complex processes of comparison, concept-formation, and reasoning. Attention was given to the various faculties of the brain – such as imagination and memory – and their role in processing visual information.
Similar content being viewed by others
Bibliography
Primary Sources
Albert the Great. (1968). De anima. In Alberti Magni Opera omnia (ed.: Stroick, C., Vol. VII, pars I). Munster: Aschendorff.
Albert the Great. (1978). De sensu et sensato (ed. and trans: Akdogan, K.). Ph.D. thesis, University of Wisconsin.
Albert the Great. (2004). Über den Menschen (De homine) (trans: Anzulewicz, H., and Söder, R. J.). Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag.
Alhacen. (1989). The optics of Ibn al-Haytham, Books I–III, On Direct Vision (ed. and trans: Sabra, A. I.). London: Warburg Institute.
Alhacen. (2001). De Aspectibus, 2 vols (ed. and trans: Smith, A. M.). Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society.
Bacon, R. (1983). De multiplicatione specierum and De speculis comburentibus (ed. and trans: Lindberg, D. C.). Oxford: Clarendon.
Bacon, R. (1996). Perspectiva (ed. and trans: Lindberg, D. C.). Oxford: Clarendon.
Blaise de Parme. (2009). Questiones super perspectiva communi (eds.: Biard, J., et al.). Paris: Vrin.
Blund, I. (1970). Tractatus de Anima (eds.: Callus, D., & Hunt, R. W.). London: Published for the British Academy by Oxford University Press.
Grosseteste, R. (1912a). De lineis angulis et figuris (ed.: Baur, L., pp. 59–60). Münster: Aschendorff.
Grosseteste, R. (1912b). De iride (ed.: Baur, L., pp. 72–78). Münster: Aschendorff.
Grosseteste, R. (1982). Hexaemeron (eds.: Dales, R. C. & Gieben, S.). Auctores Britannici Medii Aevi, 6. London: The British Academy.
Grosseteste, R. (2013). De Luce (A critical edition) (ed.: Panti, C.). In J. Flood, et al. (Ed.), Robert Grosseteste and his intellectual milieu (pp. 219–238). Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies.
Oresme, N. (1974). Questiones super quatuor libros meteororum (ed. and trans: McCluskey, S. C.). Ph.D. dissertation, University of Wisconsin.
Oresme, N. (2007). De visione stellarum (On seeing the stars) (ed. and trans: Burton, D.). Leiden/Boston: Brill.
Pecham, J. (1970). Perspectiva communis (ed.: Lindberg, D. C.). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
Pecham, J. (1972). Tractatus de perspectiva (ed. and trans: Lindberg, D. C.). St. Bonaventurs: Franciscan Institute Publications.
Pecham, J. (1978). Tractatus de sphera (ed.: MacLaren, B. R.). Ph.D. dissertation, University of Wisconsin, Madison.
Theodoric of Freiberg. (1985). Tractatus de iride et de radialibus impressionibus (eds.: Sturlese, L., & Pagnoni-Sturlese, M. R., pp. 95–286). In Corpus Philosophorum Teutonicorum Medii Aevi, II, 4.
Witelo. (1977). Witelonis Perspectivae Liber Primus: Book I of Witelo Perspectiva (ed. and trans: Unguru, S.). Studia Copernicana, Vol. XV. Warsaw: The Polish Academy of Science Press.
Witelo. (1983). Witelonis Perspectivae Liber Quintus: Books V of Witelo’s Perspectiva (ed. and trans: Smith, M. A.). Warsaw: The Polish Academy of Science Press.
Witelo. (1991). Witelonis Perspectivae Libri Duo – Liber Secundus et Liber Tertius: Books II and III of Witelo’s Perspectiva (ed. and trans: Unguru, S.). Studia Copernicana, Vol. XXVII. Warsaw: The Polish Academy of Science Press.
Witelo. (2003). Witelonis Perspectivae Liber Quartus: Book IV of Witelo’s Perspectiva (ed. and trans: Kelso, C. J.). University of Missouri-Columbia.
Secondary Sources
Crombie, A. C. (1953). Robert Grossetetste and the origins of experimental science, 1100–1700. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Demange, D. (2016). Olivi et les Perspectivi. Les sources de la théorie olivienne de la vision. Oliviana, 5. http://oliviana.revues.org/850.
Hasse, D. N. (2000). Avicenna’s De anima in the Latin West – The formation of a peripatetic philosophy of the soul, 1160–1300 (Warburg Institute studies and texts, 1). London/Turin: The Warburg Institute – Nino Aragno Editore.
Kedar, Y. & Hon, G. (2017). Roger Bacon (c. 1220–1292) and his system of laws of nature: classification, hierarchy and significance. Perspectives on Science 25(6), 719–745.
Lindberg, D. C. (1966). Roger Bacon’s theory of the rainbow: Progress or regress. Isis, 57, 235–249.
Lindberg, D. C. (1968). The theory of pinhole images from Antiquity to the thirteenth century. Archive for History of Exact Sciences, 5(2), 154–176.
Lindberg, D. C. (1970). The theory of pinhole images in the fourteenth century. Archive for History of Exact Sciences, 6(4), 299–325.
Lindberg, D. C. (1976). Theories of vision from al-Kindi to Kepler. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.
Lindberg, D. C. (1978). Medieval Latin theories of the speed of light. Roemer et la vitesse de la lumiere (CNRS, collection d’histoire des sciences, 3, pp. 45–72). Paris: Vrin.
Lindberg, D. C., & Tachau, K. H. (2013). The science of light and color, seeing and knowing. In D. C. Lindberg & M. H. Shank (Eds.), The Cambridge history of science (Medieval science, Vol. 2, pp. 485–511). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McEvoy, J. (1982). The philosophy of Robert Grosseteste. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Raizman-Kedar, Y. (2006). Plotinus’s conception of unity and multiplicity as the root to the medieval distinction between lux and lumen. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 37, 379–397.
Raizman-Kedar, Y. (2009). The intellect naturalized: Roger Bacon on the existence of corporeal species within the intellect. Early Science and Medicine, 14, 131–157.
Smith, A. M. (1981). Getting the big picture in perspectivist optics. Isis, 72, 568–589. Reprinted from Shank, M. H. (Ed.). (2000). The scientific enterprise in antiquity and the Middle Ages (pp. 315–336). Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.
Smith, A. M. (2001). Alhacen's Theory of Visual Perception. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society.
Smith, A. M. (2015). From sight to light – The passage from ancient to modern optics. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.
Tachau, K. (1988). Vision and certitude in the age of Ockham – Optics, epistemology and the foundations of semantics, 1250–1345. Leiden: Brill.
Ver Eecke, P. (1959). Euclide L’Optique et la catoptrique. Paris: Blanchard.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Kedar, Y. (2018). Optics, Latin. In: Lagerlund, H. (eds) Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1151-5_557-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1151-5_557-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-024-1151-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-024-1151-5
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities