Skip to main content

Political Philosophy, Byzantine

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy
  • 49 Accesses

Abstract

Byzantine political philosophy (BPP), in general, is a reflection on the political practices and the nature of the Empire, on the divine origin of emperorship, on the hierarchical order of imperial government, civil ranks and the community of Christian states, under the guidance of the Byzantine Emperor. In a more particular sense, it is a reflection that goes further and comments on its own foundations in Christian metaphysics, epistemology, and axiology. This second approach to the BPP is rather problematic because of the scarce textual evidence. The Byzantines felt not much need to theorize, taking for granted that their Empire is a gift from God. It was also usual in that time to impose the general theological and philosophical modes of thought on political thought, not taking into account their sophisticated interaction with facts. Thus, the BPP tended to be just a part of the imperial ideology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliography

Primary Sources

  • Agapetus Diaconus, C. P. (1865). Expositio capitum admonitorium, per partitiones adornata. PG t. LXXXVI.1, coll. 1164A–1186B, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernest, B. (1957). Social and political thought in Byzantium from Justinian I to the last Palaeologus. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eusebius. (1902). Tricennelia. In I. Heikel (Ed.), EusebiusWerke (Vol. I, (GCS 7), pp. I–XVIII). Leipzig: J. C. Hinrichs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kekaumenos. (1896). Strategicon et incerti scriptoris de officiis regiis libellus. In B. Vasilievskij & V. Jernstedt (Eds.), Zapiski Istorikofilologicheskogo Fakul’teta Imperatorskogo Peterburgskogo universiteta. Sankt-Peterburg: Tipografija B. S. Balasheva i Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nikephoros, B. (1906). Andrias basilikos. Studien zu den griechischen Fürstenspiegeln (Vol. I). München: ProgramMaximians-Gymnasium.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Meara, D., & Jacques, S. (Eds.). (2006). Miroirs de prince de l’Empire roman au IVe siècle. Friburg/Paris: Academic/Editions du Cerf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Photios. (1983). Ep. 1, Michaeli principi Bulgarorum. Photii Patriarchae Constantinopolitani Epistula et Amphilochia, vol I: Epistolarum pars prima (pp. 1–39). Leipzig: Teubner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theophylactus. (1864). Bulgariae arciepiscopus Institutio regia ad Porphyrogenitum Constantinum. PG t. CXXVI, coll. 253A–288B, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, M. (1865). Oratio de regis officii ad Andronicum II Palaeologum. PG t. CXLV, coll. 448A–500D, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

Secondary Sources

  • Anastos, M. (1978). Byzantine political theory: Its classical precedents and legal embodiment. In S. Vryonis Jr. (Ed.), The past in medieval and modern Greek culture. Byzantina kai Metabyzantina 1 (pp. 13–53). Malibu: Undena.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angelov, D. (2007). Imperial ideology and political thought in Byzantium 1204–1330. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angelov, D. (2012). Classifications of political philosophy and the concept of royal science in Byzantium 23–50. In B. Bydén & K. Ierodiakonou (Eds.), The many faces of Byzantine philosophy (Papers and Monographs from the Norwegian Institute at Athens, Series IV, Vol. 1, pp 23–50). Athens: The Norwegian Institute at Athens.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, H.-G. (1970). Res publica Romana. Vom Staatsdenken der Byzantiner. Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften, philosoph-historische Klasse, Sitzungsberichte, 2. München: Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, H.-G. (1981). Nomos, Kanon und Staatsraison in Byzanz. Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften, philosophhistorische Klasse, Sitzungsberichte, 384. Wien: Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, A. (1983). Eusebius of Caesarea and the rethinking of history. In E. Gabba (Ed.), Tria Corda. Scritti in onore di Arnaldo Momigliano. Biblioteca di Athenaeum 1 (pp. 71–88). Como: New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Döllger, F. (1953). Byzanz und die europäische Staatenwelt. Ausgewählte Vorträge und Aufsa¨tze. Ettal: Buch-Kunstverlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dvornik, F. (1966). Early Christian and Byzantine political philosophy. Origins and background (Vol. 1–2). Washington, DC: The Dumbarton Oaks Center for Byzantine Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadolin, A. (1970). A theory of history and society. With special reference to the Chronographia of Michael Psellos; 11th century Byzantium (Stockholm Studies in the History of Literature 11). Stockholm/Göteborg/Uppsala: Almquist & Wiksell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunger, H. (1982). State and society in Byzantium. Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy, 82C, 197–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karagiannopoulos, I. E. (1970). Ē politikē theōria tōn Byzantinōn. Byzantina, 2, 39–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicol, D. M. (20076). Byzantine political thought. The Cambridge history of medieval political thought, c. 350–c. 1450 (pp. 51–87). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Meara, D. (2012). Political philosophy in Michael Psellos: The Chronographia read in relation to his philosophical work. In B. Bydén & K. Ierodiakonou (Eds.), The many faces of Byzantine philosophy (Papers and Monographs from the Norwegian Institute at Athens, Series IV, Vol. 1, pp 153–170). Athens: The Norwegian Institute at Athens.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obolensky, D. (1971). The Byzantine commonwealth. Eastern Europe, 500–1453. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrogorsky, G. (1956). The Byzantine Empire and the hierarchical world order. Slavonic and East European Review, 35, 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papanikolaou, A. (2012). The mystical as political: Democracy and non-radical orthodoxy. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runciman, S. (1977). The Byzantine theocracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Treitinger, O. (1938). Die oströmische Kaiser- und Reichsidee nach ihrer Gestalttung im höfischen Zeremoniel. Vom oströmischen Staats und Reichsgedanken. Jena: W. Bierdermann.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ivan Christov .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this entry

Cite this entry

Christov, I. (2017). Political Philosophy, Byzantine. In: Lagerlund, H. (eds) Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1151-5_411-2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1151-5_411-2

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-024-1151-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-024-1151-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics