Abstract
The medieval thinkers did not have any one agreed-upon term for concept as a mental entity, but it was generally assumed that there are some such units and they were often viewed as mental words of some kind. In contrast to the words of spoken languages, which vary from nation to nation, the concepts were taken to be the same for all people. Issues related to concepts or mental words were discussed in several fields of inquiry, including logic, theology, and philosophical psychology. In logic, concepts were traditionally called “understandings” (intellectus), and they were supposed to have a mediating role between words and things in signification. This view goes back to Aristotle’s De interpretatione and Boethius’ commentaries on it. In theology, the mental word (verbum) was a prominent theme because Augustine had elaborated an analogy between the human interior word and the Word, that is, the second person of the Trinitarian God. In the tradition of philosophical psychology starting from Aristotle’s De anima, the acquisition of concepts was a central theme. These and other influences led to intricate discussions in the medieval universities about what kind of entities in the mind relating to concepts one should postulate and how they should be described. Thomas Aquinas developed a model that includes a distinction between the intelligible species, the act of understanding, and the concept proper. There was extensive dispute about issues related to concepts in the late thirteenth and early fourteenth century, and much of it revolved around ideas presented by Aquinas. William of Ockham developed an alternative to the De anima-based approach on the basis of his nominalist philosophy. The concept or mental word, identified as an act of understanding, became the basic unit in the theory of mental language that Ockham advocated.
Similar content being viewed by others
Bibliography
Primary Sources
Abelard, P. (1994). Tractatus de intellectibus (ed. Morin, P.). Paris: Vrin.
Anselm of Canterbury. (1946). Monologion (ed. Schmitt, F. S.). Opera omnia (Vol. 1). Edinburgh: Nelson.
Aquinas, T. (1949). De potentia (ed. Pession, P. M.). Quaestiones disputatae (Vol. 2). Turin: Marietti.
Aristotle. (1965). De interpretatione vel Periermenias. Translatio Boethii (ed. Minio-Paluello, L.). Aristoteles Latinus 2.1. Bruges/Paris: Desclée De Brouwer.
Augustine. (1968). De trinitate (ed. Mountain, W. J.). Corpus Christianorum, Series Latina 50–50A. Turnhout: Brepols.
Averroes. (1953). Commentarium Magnum in Aristotelis de Anima libros (ed. Crawford, F. S.). Corpus Commentariorum Averrois in Aristotelem, Versionum Latinarum Volumen VI, 1. Cambridge: Medieval Academy of America.
Avicenna. (1968/1972). Liber de anima seu sextus de naturalibus (2 vols.; ed. Van Riet, S.). Avicenna Latinus. Leiden: Brill.
Boethius. (1877/1880). In librum Aristotelis Peri ermeneias commentarii. Prima editio & Secunda editio (ed. Meiser, C.). Leipzig: Teubner.
Godfrey of Fontaines. (1904–1937). Quodlibeta (ed. De Wulf, M. et al.). Philosophes Belges (Vol. 2–5, 14). Louvain: Institut Supérieur de Philosophie.
Henry of Ghent. (1520). Summa quaestionum ordinariarum (ed. Badius, J.). Paris. (repr. St. Bonaventure: Franciscan Institute, 1953).
Olivi, Peter John. (1922–1926). Quaestiones in secundum librum Sententiarum (ed. Jansen, B.). Bibliotheca Franciscana Scholastica (Vol. 4–6). Quaracchi: Collegium S. Bonaventurae.
Duns Scotus, J. (1950–1963). Ordinatio, I (ed. Commissio Scotistica). Opera omnia (Vol. 1–6). Vatican: Typis Polyglottis Vaticanis.
William of Ockham. (1974). Summa Logicae (ed. Boehner, P. et al.). Opera philosophica (Vol. 1). St. Bonaventure: Franciscan Institute.
Secondary Sources
Kenny, A. (1993). Aquinas on mind. London: Routledge.
King, P. (2007). Abelard on mental. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly, 81, 169–187.
Knuuttila, S., & Sihvola, J. (Eds.). (2014). Sourcebook for the history of the philosophy of mind. Dordrecht: Springer.
Lagerlund, H. (Ed.). (2007). Representation and objects of thought in medieval philosophy. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Magee, J. (1989). Boethius on signification and mind. Leiden: Brill.
Paissac, H. (1951). Théologie du Verbe. Saint Augustin et saint Thomas. Paris: Cerf.
Panaccio, C. (1999). Le discours intérieur. De Platon à Guillaume d'Ockham. Paris: Seuil.
Panaccio, C. (2004). Ockham on concepts. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Pasnau, R. (1997). Theories of cognition in the later middle ages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pasnau, R. (2002a). Thomas Aquinas on human nature. A philosophical study of Summa theologiae Ia 75–89. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pasnau, R. (Ed.). (2002b). The Cambridge translations of medieval philosophical texts, vol III: Mind and knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Perler, D. (2002). Theorien der Intentionalität im Mittelalter. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.
Pini, G. (1999). Species, concept, and thing: Theories of signification in the second half of the thirteenth century. Medieval Philosophy and Theology, 8, 21–52.
Spruit, L. (1994). Species intelligibilis. From perception to knowledge. Leiden: Brill.
Tachau, K. (1988). Vision and certitude in the age of Ockham. Epistemology and the foundations of semantics 1250–1345. Leiden: Brill.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Holopainen, T.J. (2018). Mental Word/Concepts. In: Lagerlund, H. (eds) Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1151-5_329-2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1151-5_329-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-024-1151-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-024-1151-5
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities