Abstract
The internal senses are a class of cognitive faculties that were posited to exist between external sense perception and the intellectual soul. The notion of internal senses was developed in the Arabic philosophy of the Middle Ages on the basis of certain ancient philosophical ideas. The classical list of five internal senses was provided by Avicenna: common sense, retentive imagination, compositive imagination, estimative power, and memory. He also localized these faculties in the three ventricles of the brain. According to Avicenna, the function of common sense is to receive and relate the perceptions of the external senses. The retentive imagination stores the forms of these perceptions, and the compositive imagination processes these forms. Furthermore, estimative power grasps the “intentions” of the perceived objects, such as hostility or pleasantness, which the external senses do not perceive. The intentions are finally stored in memory. Averroes’ position was critical of Avicenna’s view, and both accounts had a remarkable influence in medieval Latin philosophy. Avicenna’s view dominated throughout the Middle Ages, although it was challenged and modified with help of other authorities. Albert the Great adhered to Avicenna in general outline but incorporated some of the views of Averroes, John Damascene, and Qusṭ;a ibn Lūqā. Thomas Aquinas followed the same lines but further modified the view. There were also constantly differing positions concerning whether the brain or the heart is the primary organ of the internal senses. Peter John Olivi and John Duns Scotus presented a novel reading of the estimative function, which gave up the Avicennian notion of intentions as the objects of the estimative faculty. John Buridan reduced the number of internal senses to two: common sense and memory. His view was adopted by some later authors but rejected by others.
Similar content being viewed by others
Bibliography
Primary Sources
Albert the Great. (1968). De anima (ed.: Stroick, C.). Alberti Magni Opera omnia VII.1. Münster: Aschendorff.
Albert the Great. (1986). Summae de creaturis secunda pars, quae est de homine (ed. Borgnet, A.). Opera omnia, Vol. 35. Paris: Vivès.
Aquinas, Thomas. (1948–1950). Summa theologiae (ed.: Caramello, P.). Turin: Marietti.
Avicenna. (1968/1972). Liber de anima seu Sextus de naturalibus (ed.: van Riet, S.). Avicenna Latinus, Vol. I–III. Peeters/Brill, Louvain/Leiden; vol IV–V. Éditions Orientalistes/Brill, Louvain/Leiden.
Buridan, J. (1984). Quaestiones in Aristotelis De anima liber secundus de tertia lectura, ed. Sobol PG. In: John Buridan on the soul and sensation. PhD dissertation, Indiana University.
John of Jandun. (1587). Super libros De anima subtilissimae quaestiones. Hieronymus Scotus, Venice.
Olivi, P. J. (1922–1926). Quaestiones in secundum librum Sententiarum (Vol. 3, ed.: Jansen, B.). Florence-Quaracchi: Collegium S. Bonaventurae.
Peter of Ailly. (1987). Tractatus de anima (ed.: Pluta, O.). In: Die philosophishe Psychologie des Peter von Ailly: Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte der Philosophie des späten Mittelalters. Bochumer Studien zur Philosophie (Vol. 6). Amsterdam: Grüner.
Secondary Sources
Black, D. (1993). Estimation (Wahm) in Avicenna: The logical and psychological dimensions. Dialogue, 32, 219–258.
Blaustein, M. (1984). Averroes on the imagination and the intellect. PhD dissertation, Harvard University Press.
Gätje, H. (1965). Die ‘inneren Sinne’ bei Averroes. Zeitschrift der deutschen morgenländischen Gesellschaft, 115, 255–293.
Harvey, R. E. (1975). The inward wits. Psychological theory in the middle ages and the renaissance. London: The Warburg Institute, University of London.
Klubertanz, G. (1952). The discursive power: sources and doctrine of the “Vis Cogitativa” according to St. Thomas Aquinas. St. Louis: Modern Schoolman.
Knuuttila, S., & Kärkkäinen, P. (2014). Medieval theories of internal senses. In Sourcebook for the history of the philosophy of mind (pp. 131–145). Dordrecht: Springer.
Sobol, P. G. (2001). Sensations, intentions, memories, and dreams. In J. M. M. H. Thijssen & J. Zupko (Eds.), The metaphysics and natural philosophy of John Buridan (pp. 184–198). Leiden: Brill.
Steneck, N. (1970). The problem of the internal senses in the fourteenth century. PhD dissertation, University of Wisconsin.
Taylor, R. (1999). Remarks on Cogitatio in Averroes’ Commentarium magnum in Aristotelis de anima Libros. In G. Endress & J. A. Aertsen (Eds.), Averroes and the Aristotelian tradition (pp. 217–255). Leiden: Brill.
Toivanen, J. (2007). Peter Olivi on internal senses. Br J Hist Phil, 15(3), 427–454.
Toivanen, J. (2013). Perception and the internal senses. Peter John Olivi on the cognitive functions of the sensitive soul. Leiden: Brill.
Wolfson, H. A. (1973). The internal senses in Latin, Arabic and Hebrew philosophic texts. In I. Twersky & G. H. Williams (Eds.), Studies in the history and philosophy of religion (Vol. 1, pp. 250–314). Cambridge: Harvard University Press. (originally published in Harv Theol Rev (1935) 28:69–133).
Wood, R. (2007). Imagination and experience in the sensory soul and beyond: Richard Rufus, Roger Bacon and their contemporaries. In H. Lagerlund (Ed.), Forming the mind. Essays on the internal senses and the mind/body problem from Avicenna to the medical enlightenment (pp. 27–57). Dordrecht: Springer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Kärkkäinen, P. (2018). Internal Senses. In: Lagerlund, H. (eds) Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1151-5_246-2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1151-5_246-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-024-1151-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-024-1151-5
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities