Abstract
Byzantine views on knowledge are strongly influenced by late antique Neoplatonic Aristotelianism. A basic assumption in this tradition is that the nature of cognitive states is dependent on the nature of the cognitive objects (which have independent existence). Thus, the possibility of knowledge is secured by the existence of knowable things. Modifications of the Neoplatonic views are sometimes prompted by religious considerations, but these are more to do with emphasis than with content. It was strongly emphasized by the Byzantines, for instance, that God’s essence is beyond knowledge. Likewise, the Platonic theory of recollection was repeatedly condemned because it seemed to entail the soul’s pre-existence; on the other hand, the idea that the soul at birth is a tabula rasa was in conflict with the Christian doctrine that it is created perfect, and therefore Aristotle’s theory of concept formation was interpreted (e.g., by Eustratios of Nicaea) in a way that allowed for rational principles to be innate. In fact it is not uncommon to find in Byzantine writers rationalist accounts tracing the source of knowledge to innate soul-principles side by side (or nearly so) with endorsements of empiricist views suggesting that the first principles of knowledge are constructed from the individual forms of things.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Primary Sources
(1885). Nicephori Blemmidae Epitomes isagogicae liber primus: Epitome logica, ed. Wegelin J. In Migne J-P, Patrologia graeca, vol 142. Paris, pp 685–1004.
(1892). Eustratii et Michaelis et anonyma in ethica Nicomachea commentaria, ed. Heylbut G. In CAG 20.
(1904). Davidis prolegomena et in Porphyrii isagogen commentarium, ed. Busse A. In CAG 18.2.
(1907). Eustratii in analyticorum posteriorum librum secundum commentarium, ed. Hayduck M. In CAG 21.1.
(1966). Jean Philopon: Commentaire sur le De anima d’Aristote. Traduction de Guillaume de Moerbeke, ed. Verbeke G. In CLCAG 3. Louvain & Paris.
Calabro, B. (1954). Epistole Greche. In Schirò G (ed) Istituto Siciliano di Studi Bizantini e Neogreci. Testi e Monumenti. Testi. 1. Palermo.
Nikephoros, C. (2002). 5os Logos: Antithetikos pros Plōtinon peri psychēs. In: Chrestou pp 58–86.
Theodoros, M. (2003). Stoicheiosis astronomike 1:1–5. In Bydén (2003) pp 416–474.
Theodoros, M. (2006). Poem 10. In Polemis.
Gregoras, N. (1855). Historia Byzantina, vol 3, ed. Bekker I. Corpus scriptorum historiae Byzantinae. Bonn: Weber.
Secondary Sources
Bydén, B. (2002). To every argument there is a counter-argument: Theodore Metochites’ defence of scepticism (Semeiosis 61). In K. Ierodiakonou (Ed.), Byzantine philosophy and its ancient sources. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bydén, B. (2003). Theodore Metochites’ Stoicheiosis astronomike and the study of natural philosophy and mathematics in early Palaiologan Byzantium, Studia Graeca et Latina Gothoburgensia (Vol. 66). Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
Chrestou, K. P. (2002). To philosophiko ergo tou Nikēphorou Choumnou. Thessalonike: Ekdotikos Oikos Kyromanos.
de Haas, F. A. J. (2000). Recollection and potentiality in Philoponus. In M. Kardaun & J. Spruyt (Eds.), The winged chariot: Collected essays on Plato and Platonism in honour of L. M. de Rijk. Leiden: Brill.
Demetrakopoulos, I. A. (1999). Nikolaou Kabasila Kata Pyrrōnos. Platōnikos philoskeptikismos kai aristotelikos antiskeptikismos stē buzantinē dianoēsē tou 14ou aiōna. Athens: Parousia.
Ierodiakonou, K. (2010). Eustratios’ comments on posterior analytics B19. In F. J. de Haas, M. Leunissen, & M. Martijn (Eds.), Interpreting Aristotle’s posterior analytics in late antiquity and the byzantine period (pp. 55–71). Leiden: Brill.
Podskalsky, G. (1977). Theologie und Philosophie in Byzanz: Der Streit um die theologische Methodik in der spätbyzantinischen Geistesgeschichte (14./15. Jh.), seine systematischen Grundlagen und seine historische Entwicklung. Byzantinisches Archiv 15. Munich: C. H. Beck’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung.
Polemis, I. (2006). Theodōros Metochitēs, Peri tou mathēmatikou eidous tēs philosophias, kai malista peri tou harmonikou. Poiēma 10. Eisagōgē, kritikē ekdosē, metaphrasē, sēmeisōseis. Amsterdam: Adolf M. Hakkert.
Sinkewicz, R. E. (1981). The solutions addressed to George Lapithes by Barlaam the Calabrian and their philosophical context. Mediaeval Studies, 43, 151–217.
Sinkewicz, R. E. (1982). The doctrine of the knowledge of God in the early writings of Barlaam the Calabrian. Mediaeval Studies, 44, 181–242.
Trizio, M. (2016). Il neoplatonismo di Eustrazio di Nicea. Bari: Edizioni di Pagina.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Bydén, B. (2018). Epistemology, Byzantine. In: Lagerlund, H. (eds) Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1151-5_155-2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1151-5_155-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-024-1151-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-024-1151-5
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities