Abstract
The concept of personality disorder was introduced in the twentieth century, emerging from a small collection of prior concepts such as constitution, temperament, self, character, and personality. Among the key events in the development of the concept are the introduction and subsequent rejection of degeneration theory, the work of Kurt Schneider, the DSM-III, and the recent proposals to dimensionalize personality disorder in DSM-5 and ICD-11. As the patchwork of ideas that belong to the domain of personality disorder are residues of its conceptual history, that history is herein used to guide an exploration of ongoing philosophical problems. Constitution and temperament raise the issue of the biological basis of personality and personality disorder. Recent work in behavioral genetics supports the hypothesis that personality has a genetic component but not that it is genetically determined. Surprisingly, the genetic component in personality may become more important in open societies where people can self-select into environments. Under the concept of self, the notions of causal explanation and self-continuity are important. Recent work on the psychometrics of latent variable modeling has given new life to traditional empiricist suspicions about reifying personality traits as causal entities. Longitudinal studies indicate that there is both continuity and variability in personality and personality disorder across the life span. Character is a concept drawn from moral theory and draws attention to the close association between some personality disorders and moral vices. In clinical settings, separating responsibility and blame is an important skill for working with patients diagnosed with a personality disorder. The concept of personality once referred to self-presentation but was gradually interiorized, leading to the problem of distinguishing surface versus deep features of personality. This chapter concludes with a survey of six different models regarding the nature of “disorder” in personality disorder.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allport GW (1937) Personality: a psychological interpretation. Henry Holt, Oxford
Bem DJ, Allen A (1974) On predicting some of the people some of the time: the search for cross-situational consistencies in behavior. Psychol Rev 81(6):506–520. doi:10.1037/h0037130
Berrios GE (1996) The history of mental symptoms. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
Boorse C (1975) On the distinction between disease and illness. Philos Public Affairs 5:49–68
Borsboom D, Kievit RA, Cervone D, Hood SB (2009) The two disciplines of scientific psychology, or: the disunity of psychology as a working hypothesis. In: Valsiner J, Molenaar PCM, Lyra MCDP, Chaudhary N, Valsiner J, Molenaar PCM, Lyra MCDP, Chaudhary N (eds) Dynamic process methodology in the social and developmental sciences. Springer Science + Business Media, New York, pp 67–97
Bouchard TJ, McGue M (1990) Genetic and rearing environmental influences on adult personality: an analysis of adopted twins reared apart. J Pers 58(1):263–292. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1990.tb00916.x
Charland LC (2004) Moral treatment and the personality disorders. In: Radden J (ed) The philosophy of psychiatry: a companion. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 64–77
Clark LA (2005) Temperament as a unifying basis for personality and psychopathology. J Abnorm Psychol 114(4):505–521
Cleckley HM (1941) The mask of sanity; an attempt to reinterpret the so-called psychopathic personality. Mosby, St. Louis
Cramer AOJ, Waldrop LJ, van der Mass HLJ, Borsboom D (2010) Comorbidity: a network perspective. Behav Brain Sci 33(2–3):137–150
Epstein S (1979) The stability of behavior: I. On predicting most of the people much of the time. J Pers Soc Psychol 37(7):1097–1126. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.7.1097
Funder DC (1997) The personality puzzle. W. W. Norton, New York
Goldie P (2004) On personality. Routledge, London
Han L. J. van der Maas, Conor V. Dolan, Raoul P. P. P. Grasman, Jelte M. Wicherts, Hilde M. Huizenga, and Maartje E. J. Raijmakers (2006) A dynamical model of general intelligence: the positive manifold of intelligence by mutualism. Psychol Rev 113:842–861
James W (1890) The principles of psychology. Holt, New York
Johnson W, Turkheimer E, Gottesman II, Bouchard TJ Jr (2009) Beyond heritability: twin studies in behavioral research. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 18(4):217–220. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01639.x
Jones EE, Harris VA (1967) The attribution of attitudes. J Exp Soc Psychol 3(1):1–24
Kagan J, Snidman N, Arcus D, Reznick JS (1994) Galen’s prophecy: temperament in human nature. Basic Books, New York
Kernberg OF (1975) Borderline conditions and pathological narcissism. Jason Aronson, New York
Kiehl KA (2014) The psychopath whisperer: the science of those without conscience. Crown Publishers/Random House, New York
Kohut H (1971) The analysis of the self: a systematic psychoanalytic approach to the treatment of narcissistic personality disorders. International Universities Press, New York
Lenzenweger MF (2006) Schizotaxia, schizotypy, and schizophrenia: Paul E. Meehl’s blueprint for the experimental psychopathology and genetics of schizophrenia. J Abnorm Psychol 115:195–200
Lewin K (1935) A dynamic theory of personality. McGraw-Hill, New York
Livesley WJ (2012) Tradition versus empiricism in the current DSM-5 proposal for revising the classification of personality disorders. Crim Behav Ment Health 22:81–91
Livesley WJ, Jang KL (2000) Toward an empirically based classification of personality disorder. J Pers Disord 14(2):137–151. doi:10.1521/pedi.2000.14.2.137
Livesley WJ, Jang KL, Vernon PA (1998) Phenotypic and genetic structure of traits delineating personality disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry 55:941–948
Lombardo GP, Foschi R (2003) The concept of personality in 19-th century French and 20-th century American psychology. Hist Psychol 6(2):123–142
McCrae RR, Costa PT Jr (1997) Personality trait structure as a human universal. Am Psychol 52:509–516
McGue M, Gottesman II (2015) Behavioral genetics. In: Cautin RL, Lilienfeld SO (eds) The encyclopedia of clinical psychology, vol I. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 341–351
Mischel W (1968) Personality and assessment. Wiley, New York
Morey LC, Meyer JK (2012) Course of personality disorder. In: Widiger TA, Widiger TA (eds) The Oxford handbook of personality disorders. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 275–295
Murray HA (1938) Explorations in personality. Oxford University Press, New York
Nicholson IAM (2003) Inventing personality: Gordon Allport and the science of selfhood. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC
Nisbett RE, Wilson TD (1977) Telling more than we can know: verbal reports on mental processes. Psychol Rev 84(3):231–259. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.84.3.231
Pickard H (2013) Responsibility without blame: philosophical reflections on clinical practice. In: Fulford K, Davies M, Graham G, Sadler JZ, Stanghellini G, Gipps R, Thornton T (eds) The Oxford handbook of philosophy and psychiatry. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 1134–1152
Roberts BW, Walton KE, Viechtbauer W (2006) Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course: a meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychol Bull 132(1):1–25. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.1.1
Sadler JZ (2013) Vice and mental disorder. In: Fulford K, Davies M, Graham G, Sadler JZ, Stanghellini G, Gipps R, Thornton T (eds) The Oxford handbook of philosophy and psychiatry. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 451–479
Saulsman LM, Page AC (2004) The five-factor model and personality disorder empirical literature: a meta-analytic review. Clin Psychol Rev 23(8):1055–1085
Scarr S, McCartney K (1983) How people make their own environments: a theory of genotype→environment effects. Child Dev 54(2):424–435
Schneider K (1923/1950) Psychopathic personalities (trans: Hamilton MW). Cassell, London
Schramme T (2014) Being amoral: psychopathy and moral incapacity. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Shedler J, Beck A, Fonagy P, Gabbard GO, Gunderson J, Kernberg O, … Westen D (2010) Personality disorders in DSM-5. Am J Psychiatry 167:1026–1028
Stagner R (1937) Psychology of personality. McGraw-Hill, New York
Turkheimer E (1998) Heritability and biological explanation. Psychol Rev 105(4):782–791. doi:10.1037/0033-295x.105.4.782-791
Tyrer P (2014) Time to choose—DSM-5, ICD-11 or both? Arch Psychiatry Psychother 16(3):5–8. doi:10.12740/APP/28380
Wakefield JC (1992) Disorder as harmful dysfunction: a conceptual critique of DSM-III-R’s definition of mental disorder. Psychol Rev 99(2):232–247
Widiger TA, Sanderson CJ (1995) Toward a dimensional model of personality disorders. In: Livesley WJ (ed) The DSM-IV personality disorders. Guilford Press, New York, pp 433–458
Zachar P, Krueger RF (2013) Personality disorder and validity: a history of controversy. In: Fulford K, Davies M, Graham G, Sadler JZ, Stanghellini G, Gipps R, Thornton T (eds) The Oxford handbook of philosophy and psychiatry. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 889–910
Zachar P, Krueger RF, Kendler KS (2016) Personality disorder in the DSM-5: an oral history. Psychol Med, 46:1–10
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this entry
Cite this entry
Zachar, P. (2017). Personality Disorder: Philosophical Problems. In: Schramme, T., Edwards, S. (eds) Handbook of the Philosophy of Medicine. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8688-1_77
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8688-1_77
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-017-8687-4
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-8688-1
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities