Skip to main content

Wetland Assessment: Overview

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
The Wetland Book

Abstract

Wetland assessment has been carried out by humans for hundreds, possibly thousands, of years. Initially, in an informal and unstructured way, to identify the values or hazards that might benefit or endanger those living nearby. The move to a more structured assessment approach has coincided both with greater awareness of the value of wetland habitats and recognition of the widespread damage that is being done to the natural world. Developing over the last 30–40 years, current assessment methods seek both to provide a greater understanding of the functions and value of wetland habitats and also to meet an ever-increasing need to demonstrate and defend the needs of sensitive areas of habitat in the face of human-induced pressures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acreman MC, Miller F. Practical approaches to hydrological assessment of wetlands. In: Okruszko T, Maltby E, Szatylowicz J, Swiatek D, Kotowski W, editors. Wetlands: monitoring, modelling and management. London: Taylor & Francis; 2007. p. 287–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acreman MC, Riddington R, Booker DJ. Hydrological impacts of floodplain restoration: a case study of the River Cherwell, UK. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci. 2003;7:75–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldock D, Mermet L, Mustin M, Kelly PW, Hermans B. Wetland drainage in Europe. The effects of agricultural policy in four EEC countries. London: Institute for European Environmental Policy and International Institute for Environment and Development; 1984. 166pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biebighauser TR. Wetland drainage, restoration, and repair. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coles B. The wetland revolution in prehistory. Exeter: Department of History and Archaeology, University of Exeter; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • CBD-Ramsar. Guidelines for the rapid ecological assessment of biodiversity in inland water, coastal and marine areas. CBD Technical Series no. 22 and Ramsar Technical Report no. 1. Montreal/Gland: Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity/Ramsar Convention Secretariat; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davy AJ, Hiscock KM, Low R, Jones MLM, Robins NS, Stratford C. Protecting the plant communities and rare species of dune wetland systems: ecohydrological guidelines for wet dune habitats phase 2. Bristol: Environment Agency; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora (EU Habitats Directive). Off J Eur Communities. 1992;L 206:7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finlayson CM. Forty years of wetland conservation and wise use. Aquatic Conserv Mar Freshw Ecosyst. 2012;22:139–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gitay H, Finlayson CM, Davidson NC. A framework for assessing the vulnerability of wetlands to climate change. Ramsar Technical Report No. 5/CBD Technical Series No. 57. Gland/Montreal: Ramsar Convention Secretariat/Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godwin H. Fenland : its ancient past and uncertain future. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hychka K, Wardrop D, Brooks R. Enhancing a landscape assessment with intensive data: a case study in the Upper Juniata watershed. Wetlands. 2007;27(3):446–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klemas V. Remote sensing techniques of wetlands: case studies comparing practical techniques. Journal of Coastal Research. 2011;27(3):418–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotze DC, Ellery WN, Macfarlane DM, Jewitt GPW. A rapid assessment method for coupling anthropogenic stressors and wetland ecological condition. Ecol Indic. 2012;13(1):284–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maltby E, editor. The functional assessment of wetland ecosystems: towards evaluation of ecosystem services. New Delhi: Woodhead Publishing; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and human well-being: wetlands and water. Synthesis. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsar Convention Secretariat. Inventory, assessment, and monitoring: an integrated framework for wetland inventory, assessment, and monitoring. In: Ramsar handbooks for the wise use of wetlands, vol. 13. 4th ed. Gland: Ramsar Convention Secretariat; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silva JP, Phillips L, Jones W. LIFE and Europe's wetlands: restoring a vital ecosystem. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Springate-Baginski O, Allen D, Darwall, WRT, eds. An integrated wetland assessment toolkit: a guide to good practice. Gland/Cambridge, UK: IUCN/IUCN Species Programme; 2009. xv+144p.

    Google Scholar 

  • UK Government . Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2011. National archives; 2011. Available at: http://www.legislation.gov.uk

    Google Scholar 

  • USDA. Wetland functional assessments: rapid tools used to meet the mandates of the 1985 Food Security Act and NRCS Wetland Protection Policy. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • USEPA. Application of elements of a state water monitoring and assessment program for wetlands: Wetlands Division, Office of Wetlands, Oceans and Watersheds. Washington, DC; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • USEPA. Methods for evaluating wetland condition: introduction to wetland biological assessment, EPA-822-R-02-014. Washington DC: Office of Water, U.S. Environment Protection Agency; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Fish and Wildlife Service. National Wetlands Inventory website. U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC. 2014. Available at: http://www.fws.gov/wetlands/

  • Wheeler BD, Gowing DJG, Shaw SC, Mountford JO, Money RP. In: AW B, PV J, MI W, editors. Ecohydrological guidelines for lowland wetland plant communities. Peterborough: Environment Agency (Anglian Region); 2004.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charlie J. Stratford .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Crown Copyright, as represented by The Natural Environment Research Council

About this entry

Cite this entry

Stratford, C.J. (2016). Wetland Assessment: Overview. In: Finlayson, C., et al. The Wetland Book. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6172-8_285-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6172-8_285-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-007-6172-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Biomedicine and Life SciencesReference Module Biomedical and Life Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics