Abstract
One of the key aspects of humanoid robotics is the inspiration from the human body, from human perceptuomotor skills, and from robots operating in human environments with human-made tools. Evolution did develop the human body to be very suitable for its domain of operation, and on top, humans did further tailor their environments to suit their own bodies and abilities. Thus, in order to conduct research on humanoid robots, one possible entry point is to study human behavior and neural information processing. Psychology and neuroscience are research fields with exactly this interest, but often have a strong descriptive element in their research. However, humanoid robotics requires in addition computational theories and causal modeling in order to be able to synthesize behavior with an actual physical system – in the spirit of Richard Feynman’s famous quote “What I cannot create, I do not understand.” As one of the many possibilities of approaching a historical perspective of humanoid robotics research in the USA, it appears illuminating to start with some key events of computational neuroscience which happened at a time, where it was hardly possible to build useful humanoid robots, and how several branches of humanoid robotics research developed out of this initial work.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
D. Marr, Vision – A Computational Investigation into the Human Representation and Processing of Visual Information (W.H. Freeman, San Francisco, 1982)
M. Brady, J.M. Hollerbach, T.L. Johnson, M.T. Mason, T. Lozano-Pérez, Robot Motion: Planning and Control (MIT Press, Cambridge, 1982)
T. Flash, N. Hogan, The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model. J. Neurosci. 5(7), 1688–1703 (1985)
N. Hogan, An organizing principle for a class of voluntary movements. J. Neurosci. 4(11), 2745–2754 (1984)
C.H. An, C.G. Atkeson, J.M. Hollerbach, Model-Based Control of a Robot Manipulator (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1987)
E.W. Aboaf, C.G. Atkeson, D. Reinkensmeyer, Task-level robot learning. Presented at the Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, Philadelphia, 24–29 April (IEEE, Piscataway, 1988), pp. 331–348
I.M. Jordan, Rumelhart, Supervised learning with a distal teacher. Cogn. Sci. 16, 307–354 (1992)
S. Schaal, C.G. Atkeson, Memory-based robot learning. Presented at the IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, San Diego, vol. 3, 1994a, pp. 2928–2933
F.A. Mussa Ivaldi, S.F. Giszter, Vector field approximation: A computational paradigm for motor control and learning. Biol. Cybern. 67(6), 491–501 (1992)
M. Raibert, Legged Robots That Balance (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1986)
J.J.E. Slotine, W. Li, Applied Nonlinear Control (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1991)
S. Schaal, C.G. Atkeson, Robot juggling: implementation of memory-based learning. IEEE Control Syst. Mag. 14(1), 57–71 (1994b)
M. Bühler, D.E. Koditschek, Analysis of a simplifed hopping robot. Presented at the IEEE conference on robotics and automation, 1988, pp. 845–865
M. Bühler, D.E. Koditschek, From stable to chaotic juggling: theory, simulation, and experiments. Presented at the IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, Cincinnati, 1990, pp. 845–865
A.A. Rizzi, D.E. Koditschek, Progress in spatial robot juggling. Presented at the proceedings of IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, Nice, 1992, pp. 59–71
C.G. Atkeson, J. Hale, M. Kawato, S. Kotosaka, F. Pollick, M. Riley, et al., Using Humanoid Robots to Study Human Behaviour. IEEE Intell. Syst. 15(4), 46–56 (2000)
C.G. Atkeson, S. Schaal, Learning tasks from a single demonstration. Presented at the IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA97), Albuquerque, 20–25 April, vol. 2 (IEEE, Piscataway, 1997), pp. 1706–1712
S. Schaal, Learning from demonstration, in Presented at the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 9, ed. by M.C. Mozer, M. Jordan, T. Petsche (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1997), pp. 1040–1046
S. Schaal, C.G. Atkeson, S. Vijayakumar, Real-time robot learning with locally weighted statistical learning. Presented at the international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA2000), San Francisco, Apr 2000, 2000
J. Nakanishi, R. Cory, M. Mistry, J. Peters, S. Schaal, Comparative experiments on task space control with redundancy resolution. Presented at the IEEE international conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS 2005), Edmonton, 2–6 Aug 2005, pp. 3901–3908
J. Nakanishi, T. Fukuda, D.E. Koditschek, A brachiating robot controller. IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 16(2), 109–123 (2000)
A.J. Ijspeert, J. Nakanishi, S. Schaal, Learning attractor landscapes for learning motor primitives. Adv. Neural Inf. Proces. Syst. 15, 1547–1554 (2003)
A. Billard, S. Schaal, Robust learning of arm trajectories through human demonstration. Presented at the IEEE international conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS 2001), Maui, 29 Oct–3 Nov (IEEE, Piscataway, 2001)
A. Billard, S. Schaal. Computational elements of robot learning by imitation. Presented at the American Mathematical Society central section meeting, Madison, 12–13 Oct 2002 (American Mathematical Society, Providence, 2002)
A. Ude, T. Shibata, C.G. Atkeson, Real-time visual system for interaction with a humanoid robot. Robot. Auton. Syst. 37(225), 115 (2001)
S. Vijayakumar, A. D’Souza, S. Schaal, Incremental online learning in high dimensions. Neural Comput. 17(12), 2602–2634 (2005)
S. Vijayakumar, A. D’Souza, T. Shibata, J. Conradt, S. Schaal, Statistical learning for humanoid robots. Auton. Robot. 12(1), 59–72 (2002)
T. Shibata, H. Tabata, S. Schaal, M. Kawato, A model of smooth pursuit in primates based on learning the target dynamics. Neural Netw. 18(3), 213–224 (2005)
S. Kotosaka, S. Schaal, Synchronized robot drumming by neural oscillator. J. Robot. Soc. Jpn 19(1), 116–123 (2001)
G. Cheng, S.-H. Hyon, J. Morimoto, A. Ude, G. Colvin, W. Scroggin, S.C. Jacobsen, CB: a humanoid research platform for exploring neuroscience. Presented at the humanoid robots, 2006 6th IEEE-RAS international conference on, 2006, pp. 182–187
A. Herzog, L. Righetti, F. Grimminger, P. Pastor, S. Schaal, Balancing experiments on a torque-controlled humanoid with hierarchical inverse dynamics. Presented at the proceedings of the IEEE international conference on intelligent robotics systems, Chicago, 2014, pp. 1–8. http://www-clmc.usc.edu/publications/H/herzog-IROS2014.pdf
B.J. Stephens, C.G. Atkeson, Dynamic Balance Force Control for compliant humanoid robots. Presented at the intelligent robots and systems (IROS), 2010 IEEE/RSJ international conference on, 2010, pp. 1248–1255. https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2010.5648837
R.A. Brooks, C. Breazeal, M. Marjanovic, B. Scassellati, M. Williamson, The cog project: building a humanoid robot, in Lecture Notes in Computer Science, (Springer, Berlin, 1999)
B. Scassellati, Theory of mind for a humanoid robot. Auton. Robot. 12, 13–24 (2002)
C. Breazeal, B. Scassellati, Robots that imitate humans. Trends Cogn. Sci. 6(11), 481–487 (2002)
F. Gubina, H. Hemami, R.B. McGhee, On the Dynamic Stability of Biped Locomotion. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. BME-21(2), 102–108 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.1974.324294
O. Khatib, A united approach to motion and force control of robot manipulators: The operational space formulation. Int. J. Robot. Res. 31, 43–53 (1987)
O. Khatib, O. Brock, K. Chang, F. Conti, D. Ruspini, L. Sentis, Robotics & interactive simulation. Commun. ACM 45, 46–51 (2002)
O. Khatib, L. Sentis, J. Park, J. Warrent, Whole-body dynamic behavior and control of human-like robots. Int. J. Human. Robot. 1(1), 1–15 (2004)
L. Sentis, O. Khatib, Task-oriented control of humanoid robots through prioriization. Presented at the IEEE-RAS/RSJ international conference on humanoid robots, Santa Monica, 10–12 Nov 2004
A. Goswami, Postural stability of biped robots and the foot-rotation indicator (FRI) point. Int. J. Robot. Res. 18(6), 523–533 (1999)
J. Pratt, J. Carff, S. Drakunov, A. Goswami, Capture point: a step toward humanoid push recovery. Presented at the humanoid robots, 2006 6th IEEE-RAS international conference on, 2006, pp. 200–207
S.H. Collins, M.B. Wiggin, G.S. Sawicki, Reducing the energy cost of human walking using an unpowered exoskeleton. Nature, 1–15 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14288
J. Nakanishi, J. Morimoto, G. Endo, G. Cheng, S. Schaal, M. Kawato, A framework for learning biped locomotion with dynamic movement primitives. Presented at the IEEE-RAS/RSJ international conference on humanoid robots (humanoids 2004), Los Angeles, 10–12 Nov (IEEE, Santa Monica, 2004)
J.E. Pratt, G.A. Pratt, Intuitive control of a planar bipedal walking robot. ICRA (1998)
R. Tedrake, T.W. Zhang, S. Seung, Stochastic policy gradient reinforcement learning on a simple 3D biped. Presented at the proceedings of the international conference on intelligent robots and systems, Sendai, Oct 2004, pp. 2849–2854
D.W. Robinson, J.E. Pratt, D.J. Paluska, G.A. Pratt, Series elastic actuator development for a biomimetic walking robot. Presented at the 1999 IEEE/ASME international conference on advanced intelligent mechatronics, IEEE, 1999, pp. 561–568. https://doi.org/10.1109/AIM.1999.803231
J.E. Pratt, C.-M. Chew, A. Torres, P. Dilworth, G.A. Pratt, Virtual model control – an intuitive approach for bipedal locomotion. I. J. Robot. Res. 20, 129–143 (2001)
T. McGeer, Passive dynamic walking. Int. J. Robot. Res. 9(2), 633–643 (1990)
S. Collins, A. Ruina, R. Tedrake, M. Wisse, Efficient bipedal robots based on passive-dynamic walkers. Science 307(5712), 1082–1085 (2005)
M. Srinivasan, A. Ruina, Computer optimization of a minimal biped model discovers walking and running. Nature 439(7072), 72–75 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04113
E.R. Westervelt, G. Buche, J.W. Grizzle, Experimental validation of a framework for the design of controllers that induce stable walking in planar bipeds. Int. J. Robot. Res. 23(6), 559 (2004)
J. Bohren, R.B. Rusu, E.G. Jones, E. Marder-Eppstein, C. Pantofaru, M. Wise, et al., Towards autonomous robotic butlers – lessons learned with the PR2. ICRA (2011)
R. Platt Jr., A.H. Fagg, R.A. Grupen, Manipulation gaits – sequences of grasp control tasks. ICRA (2004)
V. Sukhoy, A. Stoytchev, Learning to detect the functional components of doorbell buttons using active exploration and multimodal correlation. Presented at the humanoid robots (humanoids), 2010 10th IEEE-RAS international conference on, 2010, pp. 572–579. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICHR.2010.5686327
G. Metta, P. Fitzpatrick, Better vision through manipulation. Adapt. Behav. 11(2), 109–128 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1177/10597123030112004
A. Edsinger-Gonzales, J. Weber, Domo – a force sensing humanoid robot for manipulation research. Humanoids (2004)
W. Bluethmann, R. Ambrose, M. Diftler, S. Askew, E. Huber, M. Goza, et al., Robonaut: a robot designed to work with humans in space. Auton. Robot. 14(2–3), 179–197 (2003)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature B.V.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Schaal, S. (2019). Historical Perspective of Humanoid Robot Research in the Americas. In: Goswami, A., Vadakkepat, P. (eds) Humanoid Robotics: A Reference. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6046-2_143
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6046-2_143
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-6045-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-6046-2
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsReference Module Computer Science and Engineering