Abstract
More than 4.7% of the Zambezi River Basin is wetlands, several of which individually cover areas in excess of 1,000 km2. The basin contains 13 Ramsar Sites and thousands of lesser known wetlands. It is estimated that 20 million people (ca. 50% of the basin population) live in the vicinity of wetlands largely because of the wide range of ecosystem services, they provide, including support to fisheries, livestock and other forms of agriculture, as well as tourism. The wetlands also support considerable biodiversity, influence the hydrology of the basin and play an important role in the economies of the riparian countries. Currently there are a number of threats to the basin wetlands, including inappropriate agricultural practices, altered hydrology due to hydropower dams and overfishing. Increased irrigation and climate change are likely to add to future stresses on wetlands. However, careful planning and management, including coordinated releases from hydropower dams, could safeguard and rejuvenate many wetlands in the basin.
Access provided by CONRICYT-eBooks. Download reference work entry PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
Introduction
The Zambezi River basin is the largest river basin in Southern Africa. With a total drainage area of approximately 1.34 million km2,it is Africa’s fourth largest river after the Nile, Congo, and Niger Rivers. The main river, with a length of 3,000 km, originates in the Kalene Hills in northwest of Zambia at an altitude of 1,500 m and flows first southwest and then south before turning east to the Indian Ocean. The river has three distinct stretches: the upper Zambezi from its source to Victoria Falls, the middle Zambezi from Victoria Falls to Cahora Bassa Gorge, and the lower Zambezi from Cahora Bassa to the delta. Riparian countries are Zambia, Angola, Namibia, Botswana, Zimbabwe, Malawi, Tanzania, and Mozambique. Malawi and Tanzania do not have direct contact with the Zambezi River itself but are linked to it via the Shire River, which drains Lake Malawi. Other principal tributaries are the Luangwa, the Kafue, the Manyame, the Sanyati, the Chobe, and the Kabompo Rivers (World Bank 2010).
Lying between latitude 10° and 20° south and between longitude 20° and 37° east, the climate of the basin is largely controlled by the movement of air masses associated with the Intertropical Convergence Zone (ITCZ). Rainfall occurs predominantly during the summer (November to March), while the winter months (April to October) are usually dry. However, rainfall is characterized by considerable spatial and temporal variation. Droughts of several years duration have been recorded almost every decade (Tyson 1986), and floods also occur frequently. The natural flow regime of the river reflected the rainfall and was characterized by high seasonal and annual variability. The average annual discharge is approximately 130,500 million m3 (Mm3) (4,134 m3s−1).
Currently, due to the absence of large dams and water diversions, the upper Zambezi remains the most natural portion of the river. Further downstream, the flow is regulated by two large dams on the Zambezi main stem – Kariba and Cahora Bassa dams – as well as a number of tributary dams (most notably Kafue Gorge and Itezhi-Tezhi on the Kafue River) (Fig. 1). These were built primarily for hydropower generation (Beilfuss and dos Santos 2001). The operation of these dams has resulted in an increase in dry season flows, a delay and decrease in peak flows during the flood season, and an overall reduction in the depth and duration of floodplain inundation in the middle and lower Zambezi reaches. These changes in flow regime have had an impact on the morphology and ecology of the river and the Zambezi Delta (Beilfuss and dos Santos 2001; Nugent 1983; Ronco et al. 2010).
The basin comprises a mosaic of miombo woodland, grassland, savannah, agricultural land, and wetlands. The evolution of the basin and its major biomes and species distribution are described in Timberlake (2000).
Wetlands in the Basin
Permanent and seasonal wetlands comprising swamps, marshes, and floodplains are a major feature of the basin covering a total area of at least 63,266 km2 (4.7% of the basin) according to Lehner and Döll (2004) (Fig. 1). However, this is certainly an underestimate because in addition to the major wetlands, (Table 1) smaller wetlands, known as dambos, are common in much of the uplands, covering up to 15% of the landscape in some places (Bullock 1992). Dambos are clay-based, low-lying areas that are flooded by a combination of direct precipitation, surface runoff, and seepage from higher ground (Acres et al. 1985). They occur under a wide range of ecological conditions, and the shape and areal extent vary considerably. However, a common feature is poor drainage. The majority of dambos are characterized by vegetation communities dominated by herbaceous species, typically a large number of sedges (Cyperacea) and hygrophilous grasses (Hughes and Hughes 1992).
Riparian reed swamps , dominated by Phragmites mauritianus and Typha domingensis, occur along the upper courses of many tributary rivers with riverine forest occurring at lower altitudes (e.g., along parts of the Kafue and Zambezi above Victoria Falls where dense stands of Syzygium spp. characterize the riverbanks). Further downstream several tributaries flow into large depressions which contain permanent swamps, each of which cover tens of thousands of hectares and across which water flow is diffuse, often taking place in the absence of discrete channels. At even lower levels, the river and its tributaries have formed huge seasonally inundated floodplains.
The Upper Zambezi
Wetlands occur on many of the tributaries of the upper Zambezi (i.e., the Kabompo, the Lungue-Bungo, the Lutembwe, the Litapi, the Luena, the Luanginga, the Lueti, and the Lui), sometimes extending for many kilometers either side of the rivers. Most wetlands are essentially riparian (oxbow lakes, tall reed swamps, pans, and pools) backed by floodplain grasslands that are inundated in the wet season. Some individual wetlands are extensive (up to about 1,000 km2), but they tend to become narrower and more discontinuous further upstream (Hughes and Hughes 1992). The most important wetland system of these upper tributaries is the vast Liuwa Plain (5,000 km2) near the confluence of the Lungue-Bungo, Luambimba, and Zambezi Rivers, which supports the second largest migration of wildebeest (Connochaetes gnou) in Africa and substantial populations of endangered African painted dog (Lycaon pictus), gray crowned crane (Balearica regulorum), and wattled crane (Bugeranus carunculatus) (Kamweneshe et al. 2003).
The Barotse Floodplain covering an area of 7,700 km2 is a major wetland on the upper Zambezi that is inundated to depths of 1.5–3.0 m when the flood peaks in April. As well as the main Zambezi River, the Luanginga, Luampa, Lueti, and Lui Rivers all flow into the floodplain.
The annual inundation of the floodplain significantly influences the pattern of life in Barotse, determining seasonal human and livestock migration patterns and production cycles and also making some areas inaccessible for parts of the year. The Lozi people, the native inhabitants of the Barotse, derive a range of diverse livelihoods from the floodplain, including those based on agriculture and fisheries. Every year they celebrate the flooding of the Zambezi with the Kuomboka ceremony when, toward the end of the rainy season, they make a ceremonial move to higher ground. The successful move is celebrated with traditional singing and dancing. This ceremony dates back more than 300 years (IWMI 2013). Across the floodplain, a complex network of more than 5,000 interlinked canals was built by the Barotse Royal Establishment, the traditional authority, in the late nineteenth century. These canals serve a range of different purposes including navigation, irrigation, drainage, livestock and domestic uses, and fisheries habitat. For its important biodiversity, the Barotse was designated a Ramsar Wetland of International Importance in 2007. The area has also been proposed as a World Heritage Site in recognition of both its environmental and its cultural heritage.
The Sesheke-Maramba Floodplain (also called the eastern Caprivi or southern Barotse Floodplain) occurs along the northern border of the Caprivi Strip close to the confluence of the Zambezi and the Chobe River which enters from Botswana. The floodplain is approximately 100 km in length and extends over an area of about 1,500 km2 much of which lies in Namibia (Hughes and Hughes 1992). This floodplain is contiguous with the eastern portion of the Chobe-Linyanti floodplain system, which begins at the point where the Cuando River (the name given to the Chobe River in Angola) enters Botswana (van der Waal and Skelton 1984). The Linyanti Swamp is about 300 km2 in area, but its size varies according to the extent of flooding in the upper Zambezi (Marshall 2000). Lake Liambezi, which periodically dries up, lies at the end of the Linyanti Swamp, has an open water surface of 100 km2 when full, and is bordered by a swamp of 200 km2 (van der Waal and Skelton 1984).
The Middle Zambezi
Designated in 2010, the UNESCO Middle Zambezi Biosphere Reserve comprising riverine and terrestrial ecosystems, extends from Lake Kariba (the reservoir created by the building of the Kariba dam) and the Matusadona National Park through various national parks and safari areas adjacent to the Zambezi River, including Mana Pools, Sapi, and Chewore which together are designated as a UNESCO World Heritage Site. In total it covers an area of 28,793 km2.
Just downstream of Kariba dam, the Zambezi is joined by the Kafue River (see below) and then broadens into a braided course for some 130 km to the Mupata Gorge. The numerous streams produce many low-lying sandy islands, containing pans and pools with further pans and pools along the riverbanks. Much of the flat valley floor (ca. 12 km wide) and some river terraces used to be inundated when the river was in high flood, but now that flow is regulated by the Kariba dam, this no longer happens. However, several small tributaries (i.e., Nyamuchera, Chiruwa, Mbera, and Sapi) flow down through swampy land to the Zambezi in the vicinity of the Mana Pools. If floods in these tributaries coincide with major discharges from Kariba, substantial areas along the south bank of the Zambezi may be inundated. The area has a rich riparian flora of sedges, reeds, riverine forest, and grasslands with a clear succession based on flood tolerance (Hughes and Hughes 1992). The Mana Pools are small permanent pools that mark depressions in former river channels that have become isolated as the river moved progressively northward (Hughes and Hughes 1992). The pools have flat, grass- and reed-covered banks surrounded by forest. The main pools are permanent, deriving water from precipitation and groundwater seepage and only occasionally from flooding. The area of the pools, just a few hundred hectares, is a very small (ca 3%) portion of the total area that the Zambezi once flooded in this region.
The Kafue River is one of the major tributaries of the Zambezi, draining an area of 155,000 km2, entirely within western Zambia. It is the most significant waterway in terms of the national economy in Zambia; most of the mining, industrial, and agricultural activities and approximately 50% of Zambia’s total population are concentrated within the catchment area (Burke et al. 1994). Many permanent swamps occur on the Kafue River and its tributaries in the upper catchment. Most are narrow strips occurring on one or both sides of the river, and many are just a few hundred meters in width. However, there are several large permanent swamps: Lushwishi Swamp (100 km2), Lufwanyama Swamp (74 km2), Mininga Swamp (144 km2), and an unnamed swamp on the main stream (310 km2) (Hughes and Hughes 1992).
At a similar latitude but on different tributaries of the Kafue River, the extensive Busanga (600 km2) and Lukanga (1,800 km2) Swamps both lie in shallow depressions and have similar physiography. The Busanga Swamp supports a rich diversity of waterbirds but is isolated and poorly known (Beilfuss et al. 2007) (Photo 1). The Lukanga wetland, although named a swamp, actually comprises a treeless lake and marsh ecosystem – an intricate maze of reeds, pools, channels, and large bodies of open water (Kamweneshe and Beilfuss 2002; McCartney et al. 2011). The palustrine wetland covers approximately 95% of the area and includes stands dominated by reeds (Phragmites), mixed grass, cattail/reed mace (Typha), and termitaria grasslands. The lacustrine area comprises about 5% of the total wetland. It provides habitat for a wide range of terrestrial and aquatic flora and fauna, including at least 316 species of birds, including cranes, storks, ducks, geese, pelicans, herons, egrets, and bitterns. The hydrology of the system is complex: at times of high flow, the Kafue River causes water in the Lukanga River to backup into the swamp, and during very high floods, the Kafue River itself overflows into the wetland (Seagrief 1962). It is estimated that about 60,000 people live in, or close to, the wetland (predominantly from the Lenje and Bemba tribes) and that products, derived from fishing, hunting, and agriculture, support a hinterland population of some 6.1 million people (Ramsar 2005) (Photo 2).
The broad alluvial plain of the Kafue Flats (area 7,000 km2) lies between the Itezhi-Tezhi and Kafue Gorge dams. The river gradient through the Flats is just 0.022 m/km, and the travel time from Itezhi-Tezhi to Kafue Gorge is on average 6 weeks. Under natural conditions, the Kafue Flats flooded in the wet season (February to May) each year. Flooding usually commenced in December as a result of direct rainfall and tributary inflows, but maximum flood levels were not attained until the inflow in the main river channel reflected the heavy rainfall in the upper part of the catchment. The maximum flood arrived first in the western part of the Flats in February/March and moved slowly east, arriving at the head of the Kafue Gorge in April/May.
The Kafue Flats are one of the most biologically diverse ecosystems in Zambia. Comprising the meandering river and a complex of lagoons, oxbow lakes, abandoned river channels, marshes, levees, and floodplain grassland, they provide habitat for a wide range of birds and animals, including rare species. Over 400 bird species, including the endangered wattled crane (Bugeranus carunculatus), and 67 species of fish have been documented (Douthwaite 1982; Muyanga and Chipundu 1982). The Flats are home to the Kafue lechwe (Kobus leche kafuensis), an endemic antelope especially adapted to life in marshes (Howard and Chabwela 1986) (Photo 3). Two national parks (Lochinvar and Blue Lagoon) and associated tourist facilities were established in the early 1970s. Designated as internationally important locations of high conservation value, the combined area of these parks is 830 km2.
Traditionally, the natural resources of the Kafue Flats have been utilized in a wide variety of ways, for both commercial and subsistence purposes. It is estimated that more than 100,000 people are in some way dependent on the Flats (Scudder and Acreman 1996). Cattle grazing is a major commercial activity, and it is estimated that up to 290,000 head of cattle (10–20% of the national herd) utilize the Flats during the dry season. There is some commercial farming, primarily sugar and winter wheat. The largest producer of sugarcane is the Nkamabala Sugar Estate, owned by the Zambia Sugar Company, which presently cultivates 13,400 ha and abstracts water from the Kafue throughout the year for irrigation (McCartney and Houghton-Carr 1998). There are reeds and papyrus from which baskets and mats are woven at a subsistence level, but timber and other forest products are not common. Hunting (e.g., of lechwe), although illegal, provides an important source of protein for local people. The Flats support one of Zambia’s most productive artisanal fisheries, supplying not only the floodplain communities but also urban centers such as Kafue town and Lusaka.
The Luangwa River, another major tributary, joins the Zambezi close to the border with Mozambique, just upstream of the Cahora Bassa reservoir. The upper reaches have relatively few wetlands, but there are strips of fringing reed swamps and riparian forest in places and patches of swampy forest that occur around springs in the headwaters. In its final 350 km before its confluence with the Zambezi, the floodplain broadens out and there are many oxbows and sections of abandoned channel with levees. In the rainy season, the entire floodplain, several kilometers wide in places, is completely inundated.
The Lower Zambezi
The Zambezi River enters Mozambique at Zumbo and immediately flows into the reservoir of the Cahora Bassa dam. Downstream of the dam, the river is contained within a narrow gorge until the town of Tete. Here the valley broadens and the river develops a narrow floodplain. For much of its course between Tete and the delta, the bed of the Zambezi is 1–5 km wide, and in the dry season, the river flows in several deeply incised channels. However, during the wet season, the entire bed may be one swiftly moving current (Hughes and Hughes 1992).
The most important tributary of the Zambezi in its lower course is the Shire River, which drains Lake Malawi and Malombe. Barrages near Liwonde regulate the flow for hydroelectricity generation. In its lower course before discharging into the Zambezi, the Shire flows through an extensive low-lying area, and a series of swamps extends along the river. The Shire Swamps comprise two tracts of permanent swampland (Elephant Marsh (570 km2) and Ndinde Marsh (200 km2)) in the Chikwawa and Bangula areas. The numerous lakes and lagoons which comprise these marshes may have connection with the anastomosing river channels only during the wet season. The marshes are virtually treeless and dominated by herbaceous vegetation (Hughes and Hughes 1992). The Shire Swamps support an important fishery, cattle grazing, and agriculture (irrigated cotton and sugar) in the marginal lands.
The Zambezi Delta occurs at the downstream terminus of the river, from the Zambezi-Shire confluence to the Indian Ocean. The delta is a broad, flat alluvial plain, approximately 12,000 km2 in size. From its apex near the village of Mopeai, 120 km inland, the delta forms a large triangular area with a 200 km coastal frontage along the Indian Ocean. The Zambezi Delta is bordered to the west and north by the gently rising backslope of the African rift escarpment. The delta supports a diverse mosaic of wetland communities grading from acacia and palm savanna at the floodplain periphery, to seasonally flooded grassland, papyrus swamps, evergreen forests, and open water bodies on the low-lying plains, to mangrove forest and mud flats bordered by dunes near the coast (Beilfuss et al. 2000) (Photo 4).
The delta is an immensely productive wetland system, supporting large concentrations of African buffalo (Syncerus caffer), African elephant (Loxodonta africana), waterbuck (Kobus ellipsiprymnus), southern reedbuck (Redunca arundinum), sable antelope (Hippotragus niger), Lichtenstein’s hartebeest (Alcelaphus lichtensteinii), and Livingstone’s eland (Taurotragus oryx). Seventy-three waterbird species have been recorded, including endangered wattled crane, gray crowned crane (Balearica regulorum), large breeding colonies of great white pelican (Pelecanus onocrotalus), African openbill (Anastomus lamelligerus), and many other species of storks, herons, and spoonbills, and numerous Palearctic and intra-African migrants (Beilfuss et al. 2010). Ninety-four fish species have been recorded in the lower Zambezi River, of which 55 are primarily freshwater species and mostly floodplain dependent (Bills 2000). The mangrove crab (Scylla serrata) and other crustaceans (portunids, etc.) are present and exploited by the local population, while prawns spawning in the delta mangroves are of great economic importance as a source of foreign revenue.
The Role of Wetlands
By affecting how water is routed and stored and evaporated, wetlands play an important role in the hydrology of the Zambezi River system. Spill from the Zambezi and its tributaries into wetlands and subsequent evaporation are major components of the basin water budget. A recent study of the effect of natural wetlands on river flow in the Zambezi basin concluded that broadly (i) floodplains decrease the magnitude of flood flows and increase low flows and (ii) headwater wetlands increase the magnitude of flood flows and decrease low flows. However, in all cases examples were found which produced contrary results and simple relationships between the areal coverage of a particular wetland type within a catchment, and the impact on the flow regime was not found. This confirms that the hydrological functions of wetlands depend to a large extent on location-specific characteristics that make it difficult to generalize (McCartney et al. 2013).
Zambezi basin wetlands support considerable biodiversity and productivity in terms of plants, large mammals, birds and fish, and other groups. Knowledge of the taxonomy of the various groups is generally good, with the exception of many invertebrate groups where even a rough indication of numbers of species present is not available. Although there are a number of species restricted to the wetlands of the Zambezi basin in a number of different groups, detailed listings are not yet available except for large mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians, and fish (Timberlake 2000). It is estimated that there are 122 species of fish in the basin of which 25 are endemics (IUCN 2003). The lechwe antelope (with most of the global population occurring on Zambezi floodplains) and the wattled crane (seasonally with up to 75% of the world population in the wetlands of the Zambezi basin) are possibly the best “flagship species” for conservation of the wetlands (Timberlake 2000; Beilfuss et al. 2007).
The Zambezi wetlands play an important role in the livelihoods and well-being of many people in the basin and in the economies of the riparian countries. There are 13 Ramsar wetlands of international importance located in the basin (Table 2) which support fisheries, livestock, and other forms of agriculture, as well as tourism in addition to their considerable biodiversity value. For example, the annual gross financial value of the Barotse Floodplain is estimated to be $ 417 per household with a total annual economic value (from fish, crops, cattle, wildlife, reeds, and papyrus) of $ 12.2 million (Turpie et al. 1999). It has been estimated that the Barotse fisheries provide the bulk of the protein in the diet of about 200,000 people (Hughes and Hughes 1992). Similarly, 250,000 cattle, with a market value of $4 million, graze in the Kafue Flats wetland during the dry season each year (Seyam et al. 2001). Altogether flood recession agriculture in the major wetlands of the Zambezi is estimated to be worth US$36 million annually (Seyam et al. 2001). Many thousands of smaller, lesser-known wetlands, such as the dambos, also play a vital role in the everyday lives of poor rural communities, through the provision of clean drinking water and, because they retain extensive wet regions during the dry season, as a valuable agricultural resource in the semiarid regions of the basin (Wood et al. 2013).
Existing Threats to Wetlands
The population of the Zambezi basin is about 40 million of which 70% is rural and poor (Tumbare 2004). Currently resource overexploitation, land drainage and encroachment for agriculture, and modification of the river hydrology for large-scale hydropower and large-scale irrigation schemes are the greatest threats to the wetlands in the basin. As noted above, conversion of wetlands, including dambos, for agriculture is widespread. If conducted in an appropriate manner, it can, and does, make an important contribution to livelihoods, food security, and poverty alleviation (McCartney et al. 2010). However, with limited agricultural inputs and equipment, poor agricultural practices are prevalent resulting in wetland degradation in many places.
Currently 15 hydropower power stations are located within the basin of which by far the largest are Kariba and Cahora Bassa on the main river. The dams built in the Zambezi basin have significantly affected flow regimes, and wetlands have been greatly modified in both obvious and indirect ways through the creation of new habitats, through facilitation of distribution of species, and through reduced flooding. For example, downstream of the Kariba dam, wetlands are under extreme pressure as a result of year-round utilization by large mammals which under natural conditions would have been forced to migrate off the floodplain in the wet season. As result of this and impoverishment of the alluvium, as a consequence of silt removal from the Zambezi water before it reaches the floodplain, changes in the biotic communities of the floodplain are marked. Similarly, the ecology of the delta has been significantly altered as a consequence of flow regulation. Woody savanna and thicket species have increased in density and colonized far into the floodplain grassland mosaic. Relatively drought-tolerant grassland species have displaced flood-tolerant species in the broad alluvial floodplain, and saline grassland species have displaced freshwater species on the coastal plain. Abandoned alluvial channels are undergoing advanced stages of terrestrialization. Coastal mangrove has been replaced by saline grassland at the tidal margin. Sandbars have become stabilized and colonized by grassland and woody species (Beilfuss and dos Santos 2001).
The Itezhi-Tezhi dam was the first major dam in Africa, designed and constructed with additional storage specifically for the purpose of releasing managed floods. Flood releases were incorporated into the release regime of the dam in order to simulate the natural flooding of the Kafue Flats in March and April each year. Approximately 15% of the total live storage of the reservoir was set aside for such flood releases; a very progressive concept at the time the dam was built in the 1970s. Still the dam has undoubtedly had impacts on the Kafue Flats, many of which have been compounded by other socioeconomic changes that have occurred over the years. Substantial efforts are underway to coordinate “environmental flow” releases among Itezhi-Tezhi, Kariba, and Cahora Bassa dam operators to rejuvenate major floodplains of the middle and lower Zambezi (Beilfuss and Brown 2010; SWRSD Zambezi Basin Joint Venture 2010).
Future Challenges
Future challenges to the Zambezi basin wetlands relate to increasing population, economic development, and climate change. The population of the basin is growing rapidly, and this will inevitably increase competition for scarce resources and add to the pressure on wetlands. There are ambitious plans for additional hydropower dams and irrigation on both the main river and the tributaries, especially in Angola which has been to date a minor player in basin development. FAO (1997) estimates a potential area of 422,000 ha for formal irrigation in the basin. One likely consequence of increased water abstraction and greater flow regulation is further reduction in downstream flooding which may have significant impacts on wetland hydrology and functioning.
By changing patterns of rainfall and modifying flow regimes, climate change may also affect the basin hydrology with potentially significant impacts on flooding and hence wetlands. The Zambezi basin exhibits the worst potential effects of climate change among 11 major sub-Saharan African river basins and will experience the most substantial reduction in rainfall and runoff, according to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Multiple studies cited by the IPCC estimate that rainfall across the basin will decrease by 10–15% and runoff by as much as 40% or more (Beilfuss 2012). These changes will exacerbate existing problems for basin wetlands already degraded by altered and reduced flooding patterns.
Given the importance of the Zambezi wetlands not only for the livelihoods of many millions of people but also for the economies of the riparian countries, it is vital that future development planning takes into account the multiple services that they provide and incorporates measures to safeguard important ecosystem services.
References
Acres BD, Rains AB, King RHB, Lawton RM, Mitchell AJB, Rackham LJ. African dambos: their distribution, characteristics and use. Z Geomorphol. 1985;52:63–86.
Beilfuss RD. A risky climate for Southern African Hydro: assessing hydrological risks and consequences for Zambezi River Basin dams. Berkeley: International Rivers Network; 2012.
Beilfuss RD, Brown C. Assessing environmental flow requirements and tradeoffs for the Lower Zambezi River and Delta, Mozambique. Intl J River Basin Manag. 2010;8(2):127–38.
Beilfuss R, dos Santos D. Patterns of hydrological change in the Zambezi Delta, Mozambique. Working Paper #2: Program for the sustainable management of Cahora Bass Dam and the Lower Zambezi Valley. International Crane Foundation, USA and Direcção Naçional de Aguas, Mozambique; 2001.
Beilfuss RD, Dutton P, Moore D. Land cover and land use changes in the Zambezi Delta. In: Timberlake J, editor. Biodiversity of the Zambezi basin wetlands. Volume III. Land use change and human impacts. Harare: Biodiversity Foundation for Africa, Bulawayo/The Zambezi Society; 2000. p. 31–106.
Beilfuss RD, Dodman T, Urban EK. The status of cranes in Africa (2005). Proceedings of the 11th Pan African Ornithological Congress. Ostrich. 2007;78(2):175–84.
Beilfuss R, Bento C, Haldane M, Ribaue M. Status and distribution of large herbivores and birds of conservation concern in the Marromeu Complex of the Zambezi Delta, Mozambique. Mozambique: World Wide Fund for Nature; 2010, Department of Nature Conservation, Mozambique.
Bills R. Freshwater fish survey of the Lower Zambezi River, Mozambique. In: Timberlake J, editor. Biodiversity of the Zambezi Basin wetlands. Harare: Biodiversity Foundation for Africa, Bulawayo/The Zambezi Society; 2000. p. 461–85.
Bullock A. Dambo hydrology in southern Africa – review and reassessment. J Hydrol. 1992;134:373–96.
Burke JJ, Jones MJ, Kasimona V. Approaches to integrated resource development and management of the Kafue basin, Zambia. In: Kirby C, White WR, editors. Integrated river basin development. Chichester: Wiley; 1994.
Douthwaite RJ. Waterbirds: their ecology and future on the Kafue Flats. In: Howard GW, Williams GJ, editors. Proceedings of the National Seminar on environment and change: the consequences of hydroelectric power development on the utilization of the Kafue Flats. Lusaka: University of Zambia; 1982. p. 137–40.
Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). Irrigation in Africa: a basin approach. Rome: FAO Land and Water Development Division; 1997.
Howard GW, Chabwela HN. Fauna of Zambia’s major wetlands. Proc. Zambia Wetlands Seminar, University of Zambia, Lusaka; 1986.
Hughes RH, Hughes JS. A directory of African Wetlands. Gland/Cambridge, UK: IUCN/; 1992, UNEP, Nairobi, Kenya/WCMC, Cambridge, UK; 820 pp.
International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN). Watersheds of the world CD. Gland: IUCN; 2003.
International Water Management Institute (IWMI). Wetlands and people. Colombo: IWMI; 2013. 32pp.
Kamweneshe B, Beilfuss R. Wattled Cranes, waterbirds, and large mammals of the Lukanga Swamp, Zambia. Working paper #2 of the Zambia Crane and Wetland Conservation Project. International Crane Foundation, USA and Endangered Wildlife Trust, South Africa; 2002.
Kamweneshe B, Beilfuss R, Morrison K. Population and distribution of Wattled cranes and other large waterbirds and large mammals on the Liuwa Plains National Park, Zambia. Working paper #4 of the Zambia Crane and Wetland Conservation Project. International Crane Foundation, USA and Endangered Wildlife Trust, South Africa; 2003.
Lehner B, Döll P. Development and validation of a global database of lakes, reservoirs and wetlands. J Hydrol. 2004;296(1–4):1–22.
Marshall BE. Fishes of the Zambezi basin. In: Timberlake J, editor. Biodiversity of the Zambezi basin wetlands. Harare: Biodiversity Foundation for Africa; 2000. p. 393–460. Bulawayo/The Zambezi Society.
McCartney MP, Houghton-Carr HA. A modelling approach to assess inter-sectoral competition for water resources in the Kafue Flats, Zambia. J Ch Inst Water Environ Manag. 1998;12:101–6.
McCartney MP, Rebelo L-M, Senaratna Sellamuttu S, de Silva S. Wetlands, agriculture and poverty reduction. Colombo: International Water Management Institute (IWMI Research Report 137); 2010. doi:10.5337/2010.230. 39 pp.
McCartney MP, Rebelo L-M, Mapedza E, de Silva S, Finlayson CM. The Lukanga Swamps: use, conflicts and management. J Int Wildl Law Policy. 2011;14:293–310.
McCartney MP, Cai X, Smakhtin V. Evaluating the flow regulating functions of natural ecosystems in the Zambezi Basin. Colombo: International Water Management Institute (IWMI Research Report 148); 2013. doi:10.5337/2013.206. 51pp.
Muyanga ED, Chipundu PM. A short review of Kafue flats fishery from 1968 to 1978. In: Howard GW, Williams GJ, editors. The consequences of hydroelectric power development on the utilization of the Kafue Flats. Proceedings of the National Seminar on environment and change. Lusaka: University of Zambia; 1982. p. 105–13.
Nugent C. Channel changes in the Middle Zambezi. Zimb Sci News. 1983;17:127–9.
Ramsar. Ramsar information sheet, Ramsar sites information service, Lukanga Swamps. 2005. http://www.wetlands.org/reports/ris/1ZM0032007.pdf
Ronco P, Fasolato G, Nones M, Di Silvio G. Morphological effects of damming on the lower Zambezi River. Geomorphology. 2010;115:43–55.
Scudder T, Acreman MC. Water management for the conservation of the Kafue wetlands, Zambia and the practicalities of artificial flood releases. In: Acreman MC, Hollis GE, editors. Water management and wetlands in Sub-Saharan Africa. Gland: IUCN; 1996. p. 101–6.
Seagrief SC. The Lukanga swamps, northern Rhodesia. J S Afr Bot. 1962;28:3.
Seyam IM, Hoekstra AY, Ngabirano HHG. The value of freshwater wetlands in the Zambezi basin. Delft: IHE; 2001. 22pp.
SWRSD Zambezi Basin Joint Venture. Dam synchronisation and flood releases in the Zambezi River Basin project. Transboundary Water Management in SADC. Main Report and Four Annexes. 2010. 802 pp.
Timberlake J. Biodiversity of the Zambezi Basin. Biodiversity Foundation for Africa. Occasional Publications in Biodiversity No. 9, Bulawayo; 2000. 23 pp.
Tumbare MJ. The Zambezi River: its threats and opportunities. Paper presented at 7th river Symposium, Brisbane, 1–3 Sept 2004. http://www.archive.riversymposium.com/2004/index.php?element=Tumbare+M. Accessed 20 June 2015.
Turpie JK, Smith B, Emerton L, Barnes J. Economic value of the Zambezi Basin wetlands. Report to IUCN ROSA. Harare; 1999.
Tyson PD. Climatic change and variability in Southern Africa. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1986.
van der Waal BCW, Skelton PH. Check list of the fishes of Caprivi. Modoqua. 1984;13:303–20.
Wood A, Dixon A, McCartney M. Wetland management and sustainable livelihoods in Africa. London: Routledge; 2013.
World Bank. The Zambezi River basin: a multi-sector investment opportunities analysis, Volume 3: State of the basin; 2010.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature
About this entry
Cite this entry
McCartney, M., Beilfuss, R.D., Rebelo, LM. (2018). Zambezi River Basin. In: Finlayson, C., Milton, G., Prentice, R., Davidson, N. (eds) The Wetland Book. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4001-3_91
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4001-3_91
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-4000-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-4001-3
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesReference Module Biomedical and Life Sciences