Abstract
Intravenous retrograde anesthesia (IVRA) of the limbs is an anesthesiological technique performed for the first time by Bier in 1908, who enjoyed a certain measure of success only after 1946, which was the year when new, less toxic local anesthetics became available on the market.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Intravenous regional anesthesia
- IVRA
- Bier block
- Tourniquet
- Ambulatory and urgency surgery on the distal segments of the limbs
Intravenous retrograde anesthesia (IVRA) of the limbs is an anesthesiological technique performed for the first time by Bier in 1908, who enjoyed a certain measure of success only after 1946, which was the year when new, less toxic local anesthetics became available on the market.
It is a technique that is easy to perform with failure rates below 1 % and is used in surgical operations on the forearm, hand, leg, and foot lasting not more than 90 min. It is particularly indicated in allergic patients or in patients with COPD, in patients with a full stomach, and in outpatient surgery.
The technique is based on the injection of an anesthetic solution into the vein of the limb to be submitted to surgery and rendered ischemic at the root. It has a short onset time and affords good muscle relaxation.
The mechanism whereby the anesthesia sets in with this technique is still controversial. There are two different theories:
-
peripheral: penetration of the local anesthetic injected, via the vasa nervorum and the capillaries, into the nerve trunks with distal block and subsequent penetration of the peripheral fibers with retarded proximal blockade;
-
truncular: distribution of the anesthetic mainly at the level of the joint of the limb.
The most likely hypothesis is the peripheral theory inasmuch as the local anesthetic reaches both the main nervous system and the peripheral nerve endings via the vascular route. A number of authors, on the other hand, have proposed nerve ischemia as the mechanism of action of IVRA, but this is only suggestive in that the onset varies in relation to variations in the local anesthetic used.
To shorten the latency of the block, an adjuvant such as sodium bicarbonate (alkalinization) can be used in conjunction with the local anesthetic as well as an analgesic agent for prolonging the analgesia (local peripheral action).
12.1 Indications and Contraindications
The characteristics and advantages of IVRA indicate it, if properly executed, as the technique to be preferred in outpatient surgery and in urgent operations on the distal segments of the limbs.
IVRA is contraindicated when it is impossible to obtain satisfactory arterial occlusion in the presence of:
-
major obesity (BMI >35);
-
severe hypertension;
-
major arterial calcifications;
-
intolerance or allergy to local anesthetics.
It is not indicated in patients with:
-
drepanocytosis;
-
acute ischemia of the limb;
-
BAV grades II–III, not conducted;
-
infectious cellulitis;
-
arteritis;
-
ischemic cardiopathy; and
-
severe liver failure.
12.2 Advantages and Disadvantages
The advantages of this technique are mainly related to its ease of execution, and the minimal complication rates and side effects, together with good stability of the vital functions, rapid onset of anesthesia, rapid reversibility, muscle relaxation, and low cost.
Patient bed rest, fasting and postoperative somnolence are to be avoided. After a few hours, the patient can return home in a state of perfect well-being.
The disadvantages, on the other hand, are due to the potentially severe systemic toxic effects, the patient’s poor tolerance of the tourniquet cuff (sometimes even painful), the short-lasting surgical time, and the impossibility of controlling the surgical hemostasis before removing the cuff.
12.3 Technique
The preparation of the patient, as in the case of all anesthesiological procedures, entails the performance of laboratory examinations with coagulation screening, ECG, and the preoperative anesthesiological visit, with the signing of informed consent. Chest X-rays can be omitted.
The technique must be performed after first monitoring the patient’s vital parameters (ECG, blood pressure, SpO2) to be maintained throughout the entire intervention.
A vein of the upper limb not involved in the intervention is cannulated for the fluid therapy and the administration of drugs; we then proceed with the premedication.
The vein is then sought for the execution of the technique as close as possible to the surgical site and a small-caliber (e.g., 22 G) needle cannula is positioned—equipped with an occlusion system—which is fixed to the skin (Fig. 12.1).
In order to avoid the entry of local anesthetic into the systemic circulation, also via the interosseous vessels, before it is completely absorbed, a double-cuff tourniquet with independent inflation control is applied above the main joint of the limb (elbow or knee) (Figs. 12.2, 12.3), or, failing that, two pneumatic cuffs at a distance of approximately 10 cm from one another and connected up to an inflation system capable of maintaining constant pressure of the cuffs throughout the entire procedure (e.g., the Tourniquet System produced by Officine Rizzoli in Bologna).
12.4 Drugs
The most commonly used local anesthetics are, in order of frequency of use, lidocaine (2–3 mg/kg bw), levobupivacaine or ropivacaine (0.25 mg/kg bw), and mepivacaine (1 mg/kg bw).
Bicarbonate solution is used for alkalinization, and opioids, NSAIDs, or clonidine for prolonging the analgesia.
12.5 Procedure
First of all, the limb is rendered ischemic either with the Esmarch bandage or by keeping the extremity of the arm raised for 10–15 min (Fig. 12.4). The proximal cuff is then inflated up to a pressure of at least 100 mm Hg above the patient’s systolic pressure.
After verifying the perfect sealing of the cuff, the limb is brought back to the resting position and the previously prepared anesthetic solution is injected via the predisposed needle cannula (Fig. 12.5).
The local anesthetic solution plus any adjuvants or synergistic agents is diluted with saline to a volume of 30–40 ml for the upper limb or 50–70 ml for the lower limb and injected slowly in at least 4–5 min.
The anesthesia sets in the space of approximately 15 min.
After checking that the anesthesia has set in also in the region immediately proximal to the distal cuff, the anesthetist proceeds to inflate the second (distal) cuff to the same pressure as the first and, only after ascertaining that the cuff is sealed, is the proximal cuff deflated.
In the anesthesia induction phase, the patient may manifest distress or pain due to the pressure exerted by the proximal cuff. To avoid this discomfort, anesthetic infiltration of the medial cutaneous nerve of the arm at the level of the axilla can be performed.
The duration of the intervention is limited by the ischemia time of the limb concerned, which is normally set at 90 min. However, also in the case of very brief surgical interventions, the distal cuff should never be deflated at less than 40 min in order to avoid the massive entry of as yet unabsorbed or non-metabolized local anesthetic into the bloodstream. For the same reason, at the end of the intervention the cuff should be deflated slowly. Also, the reappearance of the circulation in the ischemic limb may cause disagreeable sensations, as may the entry into the bloodstream of free radicals accumulated in the segments of the ischemic limb.
The anesthesia persists for about 10 min after completely deflating the cuff, and the analgesia persists for a period of 60–90 min. The addition of an analgesic agent to the anesthetic solution enables a postoperative analgesia of approximately 6 h to be obtained. In the postoperative period early walking and feeding are advisable so as to avoid the need for infusion therapy.
12.6 Side Effects
These include the following:
-
The massive entry of local anesthetic into the bloodstream with numbness, tinnitus, palpitations, or eye accommodation disorders;
-
At revascularization of the limb, intense heat, and numbness;
-
Entry of free radicals into the bloodstream with consequent hypotension and transient skin rash.
12.7 Complications
The complications are caused by the prolonged ischemia of nerve structures that may give rise to transitory or permanent lesions, and by the sudden, massive entry of local anesthetic into the bloodstream by direct injection due to a lack of or inadequate inflation of the cuff, or to accidental or premature deflation of the latter. The sudden entry of local anesthetic into the bloodstream may cause disorders ranging from simple paresthesias of the tongue and lips to bradycardia and/or severe arrhythmia, agitation, tachypnea, nausea, vomiting, and dizziness. In extremely severe cases, the patient may suffer convulsions, respiratory failure, and even heart failure.
12.8 Conclusions
IVRA of the limbs does not require expensive equipment for its execution and has a very rapid learning curve. The cost of the materials used is very modest, and the frequency of accidents, complications, and side effects is very low. Patient satisfaction, after an initial period of perplexity, is very good, as is that of the surgeons.
Bibliography
Atanassoff PG, Hartmannsgruber MW (2002) Central nervous system side effects are less important after iv regional anesthesia with ropivacaine 0.2 % compared to lidocaine 0.5 % in volunteers. Can J Anaesth 49(2):169–172
Bier A (1908) New method for local anesthesia in extremities. Ann Surg 48:780
Guay J (2009) Adverse events associated with intravenous regional anesthesia (Bier block): a systematic review of complications. J Clin Anesth Guay J 21(8):585–594
Hartmannsgruber MW, Silverman DG, Halaszynski TM, Bobart V, Brull SJ, Wilkerson C, Loepke AW, Atanassoff PG (1999) Comparison of ropivacaine 0.2 % and lidocaine 0.5 % for intravenous regional anesthesia in volunteers. Anesth Analg 89(3):727–731
Johnson CN (2000) Intravenous regional anesthesia: new approaches to an old technique. CRNA 11(2):57–61
Sen S, Ugur B, Aydin ON, Ogurlu M, Gezer E, Savk O (2006) The analgesic effect of lornoxicam when added to lidocaine for intravenous regional anesthesia. Br J Anaesth 97(3):408–413
Sethi D, Wason R (2010) Intravenous regional anesthesia using lidocaine and neostigmine for upper limb surgery. J Clin Anesth 22(5):324–328
Simon MA, Gielen MJ, Alberink N, Vree TB, van Egmond J (1997) Intravenous regional anesthesia with 0.5 % articaine, 0.5 % lidocaine, or 0.5 % prilocaine. A double-blind randomized clinical study. Reg Anesth 22(1):29–34
Singh R, Bhagwat A, Bhadoria P, Kohli A (2010) Forearm IVRA, Using 0.5 % lidocaine in a dose of 1.5 mg/kg with ketorolac 0.15 mg/kg for hand and wrist surgeries. Minerva Anestesiol 76(2):109–114 IVRA
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer-Verlag Italia
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Raffa, M., Greco, M., Barbati, A. (2014). Intravenous Retrograde Anesthesia. In: Alemanno, F., Bosco, M., Barbati, A. (eds) Anesthesia of the Upper Limb. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-5418-9_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-5418-9_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Milano
Print ISBN: 978-88-470-5417-2
Online ISBN: 978-88-470-5418-9
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)