Abstract
During the last decade, focused assessment with sonography for trauma has increasingly become the initial diagnostic modality of choice for trauma patients. Emergency physicians practicing in general hospitals must often quickly evaluate and treat the patient at their hospital. The suspicion of a significant intra-abdominal injury requiring laparotomy greatly influences the decision. Focused assessment with sonography for trauma has become a routine part of the initial evaluation of victims of blunt abdominal trauma. Although it has limited ability to detect specific organ injury, its ability to rapidly and noninvasively assess whether these is intra-abdominal hemorrhage makes it a useful diagnostic tool.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Emergency medicine
- Abdominal imaging
- Blunt trauma
- Emergency radiology
- Exploratory laparotomy
- Focused assessment with sonography for trauma
- Focused abdominal sonography for trauma
- Sonography
1 Introduction
Focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) is an echographic approach used for patients with abdominal trauma. It is a limited bedside ultrasound examination that seeks to quickly detect free intra-abdominal fluid, particularly blood. Extended FAST (E-FAST) expands the examination to assess whether there is pneumothorax or cardiac complications.
FAST answers one question only: Is there free fluid in the abdomen?
So, the indications for performing FAST are blunt or penetrating trauma, trauma in pregnancy, or hypotension of unclear cause.
FAST helps to select the patients requiring emergent laparotomy and who can be monitored or can await slower, more definitive studies. The FAST examination has many advantages over more traditional tests such as explorative laparatomy, peritoneal lavage, and abdominal CT scan, as listed below:
-
It decreases the time needed for diagnosis because it can be executed at the bedside, it is noninvasive, and it does not require a contrast medium or radiation.
-
It is safe in pregnant woman and in children.
-
It can be performed serially.
-
It has high specificity to detect free fluid (between 98 and 100%).
-
It can be used to diagnose and assess the degree of hemoperitoneum.
-
It needs a short training period, so its use can be extended to every emergency doctor.
On the other hand, FAST has many drawbacks:
-
It has lower sensibility to detect peritoneal fluid (between 73 and 88%).
-
It requires almost 200 ml of fluid for detection.
-
It cannot detect retroperitoneal fluid.
-
It has limited ability to detect organ lesions.
-
It is operator-dependent.
-
Difficult in obese subjects.
The conclusion is that negative findings from FAST do not exclude the presence of peritoneal fluid.
2 Indication for FAST or E-FAST and Examination Skill
-
1.
Abdominal trauma
-
2.
Trauma in pregnancy
-
3.
Hypotension of unclear cause
The philosophy behind the FAST examination is that fluid pools in the lower areas of the abdomen and chest. Four views can be used for the abdomen:
-
Right lumbar (hepatorenal recess)
-
Left lumbar (perisplenic)
-
Suprapubic window
-
Subxiphoid pericardial window to evaluate the heart
A standard 3.5-MHz convex probe can be used.
Views and the position of the probe are shown in Fig. 46.1 .
3 Right Lumbar Side
With this view the hepatorenal space is explored. This is named the Morison pouch. The probe is placed on the right upper quadrant at the mid-axillary line between the ninth and 11th ribs. Both oblique and coronal views should be used. The examiner can see the liver and during deep inspiration the kidney appears and with it the Morrison pouch, which is the space between the liver and the right kidney. In a supine patient this space is chosen for drainage of ascites, the place where initially all peritoneal liquid, if enough, accumulates. Normally, it is free from fluid and appears hyperechoic. In cases of hemoperitoneum, the Morison pouch appears as an anechoic strip.
If there is copious fluid, over 200 ml, it may be detected in the perihepatic space (Fig. 46.2).
4 Upper Left Lumbar Side
The probe is placed over the left flank, on the left upper quadrant at the posterior axillary line between the ninth and 11th ribs. Sliding the probe superiorly and inferiorly will help to detect free fluid above the spleen and along the spleen tip. Ascites can be seen at the upper splenic tip, in the subphrenic place over the spleen, or in the recess between the spleen and left kidney. It appears as an echogenic space which better defines the outline of the spleen (Fig. 46.3).
5 Suprapubic View
The probe should be placed just above the pubic symphysis and directed inferiorly (Fig. 46.1). The pelvis is the most dependent part of the peritoneal cavity, so it is fluid collects there easily. Both sagittal and transverse views should be obtained. The bladder should be left full to provide a better window. So, fluid around and behind the bladder can be stressed and in women so can the Douglas pouch.
6 Subxiphoid View
The subxiphoid view is obtained by placing the probe in the subxiphoid space directed toward the left shoulder, at an orientation of 45°. This will allow the diaphragm and pericardium to be viewed and a four-chamber view of the heart. This view may be uncomfortable for many patients because it requires significant pressure on the upper abdomen to perform it.
Further Reading
ACEP Clinical Policies Committee and the Clinical Policies Subcommittee on Acute Blunt Abdominal Trauma (2004) Clinical policy: critical issues in the evaluation of adult patients presenting to the emergency department with acute blunt abdominal trauma. Ann Emerg Med 43(2):278–290
American College of Surgeons (2008) Advanced trauma Life support for doctors. Student course manual, 8th edn. American College of Surgeons, Chicago
Boulanger BR, Kearney PA, Brenneman FD et al (2000) Utilization of FAST (focused assessment with sonography for trauma) in 1999: results of a survey of North American trauma centers. Am Surg 66(11):1049–1055
Bode PJ, Edwards MJ, Kruit MC et al (1999) Sonography in a clinical algorithm for early evaluation of 1671 patients with blunt abdominal trauma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 172(4):905–911
Farahmand N, Sirlin CB, Brown MA et al (2005) Hypotensive patients with blunt abdominal trauma: performance of screening US. Radiology 235(2):436–443
Lee BC, Ormsby EL, McGahan JP et al (2007) The utility of sonography for the triage of blunt abdominal trauma patients to exploratory laparotomy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188(2):415–421
Natarajan B, Gupta PK, Cemaj S, Sorensen M, Hatzoudis GI, Forse RA (2010) FAST scan: is it worth doing in hemodynamically stable blunt trauma patients? Surgery 148(4):695–700
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Italia
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lagi, A., Marini, F. (2013). Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma. In: Sarti, A., Lorini, F. (eds) Echocardiography for Intensivists. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2583-7_46
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2583-7_46
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Milano
Print ISBN: 978-88-470-2582-0
Online ISBN: 978-88-470-2583-7
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)