Abstract
Transgenic sorghum has trailed behind other cereals in progress due to tissue culture limitations, lack of model genotypes, low regeneration, and lack of sustainability of regeneration through sub-cultures. Particle bombardment and Agrobacterium-mediated methods are frequently preferred methods for production of transgenic sorghum. Immature embryos and shoot apical meristems are the most suited as target material for genetic transformation. Transformation efficiency is improved through tailored in vitro protocols in desirable genotypes. Many agronomically important traits were introduced in sorghum genotypes to improve quality of grain and forage and to increase resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses. Despite several improvements in transgenic technology and its application for sorghum crop improvement, so far there are no reports on the release and cultivation of transgenic sorghum. Deployment of innovative genetic modification technologies that can keep away from GMO classification and biosafety concerns in sorghum can benefit the producers and consumers of sorghum.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
1 Introduction
Success in developing improved cultivars by genetic engineering requires an efficient gene transfer, stable integration, and predictable expression of the transgene. With the advent of genetic transformation techniques based on recombinant DNA technology, it is now possible to insert genes that confer resistance to a number of biotic stresses and to several abiotic factors into the plant genome efficiently which in turn improve the yield. Agronomically useful genes available across genera can be incorporated into the sorghum genome through gene transfer techniques along with reproducible tissue culture protocols to produce transgenic sorghum plants with enhanced yield and nutritional quality.
Though significant progress has been achieved in genetic transformation in cultivable crops, there have been very few reports on sorghum. Sorghum has trailed behind other cereals in the progress toward genetic transformation due to limitations in tissue culture, such as low regeneration frequency and accumulation of phenolic pigments. Being the most recalcitrant crop for tissue culture, regeneration, and genetic transformation, sorghum has lagged behind in the application of transgenic approach for genetic improvement as compared to other cereal crops. To date, there is no transgenic sorghum under commercial cultivation. Attempts were made in sorghum to transform with marker, selectable, and agronomically useful genes. The summary of reports on genetic transformation of sorghum is presented in Table 9.1. Despite several advancements in tissue culture techniques of sorghum, the genetic transformation is by no means either routine or easy.
2 Genetic Transformation
Three different methods of genetic transformation have been reported in sorghum, viz., protoplast-mediated transformation, particle bombardment, and Agrobacterium-mediated transformation.
2.1 Protoplast-Based Transformation
The first report of genetic transformation of sorghum described the introduction of DNA into protoplasts by electroporation and selection of transformed cells, without achieving plant regeneration (Battraw and Hall 1991). Parameters influencing the stable transformation of sorghum protoplasts with a chimeric neomycin phosphotransferase II (nptII) and β-glucuronidase genes by electroporation were investigated. Sorghum cell suspensions can be established initially, but they do not sustain regeneration for longer periods. The cells tend to elongate and lose their regeneration potential making isolation and regeneration of protoplasts difficult. Limitations of protoplast method are that it is laborious, needs special skills, is genotype specific, and has low regeneration ability. To overcome these difficulties, leaf mesophyll tissues were used for isolation of protoplasts in dicots. Sairam et al. (1999) isolated protoplasts and regenerated plants from protoplasts isolated from leaf tissues of sorghum seedlings. However, further work on mesophyll protoplasts and genetic transformation was not followed up.
2.2 Particle Bombardment
The biolistic approach has been used extensively for the gene transfer in most of the monocot crops, including sorghum owing to its advantages over Agrobacterium-mediated approach. Hagio et al. (1991) demonstrated the first stable expression of the hph and nptII genes that conferred resistance to selectable levels of hygromycin and kanamycin, respectively. Their results extended the utility of the biolistic method as a useful DNA delivery system for the transformation of sorghum. The first transgenic sorghum plants were obtained by Casas et al. (1993, 1997) through microprojectile bombardment of immature embryos and immature inflorescence-derived calli, but with a relatively low transformation frequency (0.2 %), a protracted time in culture (7 months), in the genotype, PI898012, which has poor agronomic traits.
Maize genes encoding anthocyanin transcription factors (R and C1) were used by Casas et al. (1993) to optimize DNA delivery parameters in sorghum immature embryos. Frequency of transient expression of gus was less than 20 blue foci/embryo, which indicated that transient gene expression level in sorghum was lower than in maize due to genotype effect or interactions between genotype and acceleration pressure or other inherent characteristics of sorghum scutellar tissue. Immature embryos and immature inflorescences were used as explants by Kononowicz et al. (1995) for particle bombardment and plant regeneration. Genotype-specific differences in the response of primary explants to regeneration protocols have been found among sorghum genotypes studied and the genotypes PS98012 (immature embryos) and SRN39 (immature inflorescence) were found to be promising.
Optimization of transformation conditions, parameters for microprojectile bombardment, and strength of promoters were reported by Tadesse et al. (2003) in the genotype 214856, which is capable of producing a good-quality callus and less susceptible to phenolic pigments during selection on geneticin. Transgenic sorghum was produced by the combined use of optimized bombardment conditions, strong monocot gene promoters, and stepwise antibiotic selection. Physical and biological parameters that give the highest transient expression of the introduced gus reporter gene without compromising the frequency of somatic embryogenesis and regeneration capacity were studied. Variation in transient gene expression level was observed with different types of explants, and with different pressures. It was concluded that immature embryos and shoot tips were the best explants to target potential progenitor cells that are competent for embryogenesis. Evaluation of transient expression of the gus reporter gene under the control of a number of parameters using four different promoters revealed that the activity of all three monocot promoters (ubi1, act1, and adh1) was higher in sorghum than that of the CaMV 35S promoter (Tadesse et al. 2003). However, maize ubi1 and rice act1 gene promoters were preferred for stable expression of foreign genes in sorghum immature embryo and shoot tip explants. The transformation frequency ranged between 0.5 and 1.3 % for shoot tips and immature embryos, respectively. Very slow or no root formation was observed on shoots regenerated under selection on phosphinothricin or geneticin.
A low incidence of transgenic sorghum has been obtained using particle bombardment of callus explants of the genotypes, P898012 (Casas et al. 1993; Rathus et al. 2004), SRN 39 (Casas et al. 1997) and Tx430 (Zhu et al. 1998). This indicates that an efficient genotypes-independent plant regeneration system is vital for the development of transformation protocols for sorghum. Sorghum line, P898012, is reported by many because it is capable of producing a good/better embryogenic, quality callus from immature embryos and was very responsive to coconut water (Casas et al. 1993; Kaeppler and Pederson 1997; Carvalho et al. 2004). Frequently reported sorghum genotypes for successful transformation are P898012, Tx430, and C401 (Table 9.1). Immature embryos are the most preferred target tissues in sorghum. However, they are not available round the year due to the photoperiodic sensitivity of many agronomically important genotypes. Improved methods for rapid isolation and culture of immature embryos can aid in large-scale transformation experiments (Raju et al. 2007). Multiple shoot buds induced from shoot apical meristems are promising target tissues for genetic transformation, which mitigate the issues of regeneration and availability round the year. Callus cultures derived from immature inflorescences in sorghum, though have high regeneration at 30–50 days, decrease rapidly further making the recovery of transgenic plants a challenge. A highly efficient microprojectile transformation system for sorghum has been developed by Liu and Godwin (2012) using immature embryos of inbred line Tx430. After optimization of tissue culture media and parameters of microprojectile transformation, 25 independent transgenic events were obtained from 121 bombarded immature embryos with an average transformation frequency of 20.7 % in three independent experiments, the highest frequency reported so far.
Use of the cytidine analog, 5-azacytidine (azaC), in reversing the methylation-mediated transgene silencing in sorghum was demonstrated by Emani et al. (2002). It was possible to activate gus gene expression in T 1 seedlings and in calli derived from immature T 1 and T 2 embryos by the treatment of 5-azacytidine (azaC). The investigators suggested that methylation-based silencing is frequent in sorghum and probably responsible for several cases of transgene inactivation reported earlier in sorghum.
2.3 Agrobacterium-Mediated Transformation
Agrobacterium-mediated transformation is the most preferred method among the researchers due to its advantages in the production of transgenic plants with single or low-copy inserts. The first successful report in sorghum transformation using this method was reported by Zhao et al. (2000) using the public line P898012, in which four factors that influence sorghum transformation the most were identified, viz., (1) sensitivity of immature sorghum embryos to Agrobacterium infection, (2) growth conditions of donor plant, (3) type of explant, and (4) cocultivation medium. Necrotic response in explants after cocultivation is a critical factor to improve the transformation efficiency. Immature embryos of sorghum proved to be very sensitive to Agrobacterium infection, and it was found that the level of embryo death after cocultivation was the limiting step in improving transformation efficiency. Hence, attention should be given to the number of Agrobacterium cells in the inoculum, selection of sorghum genotypes, and explants less sensitive to Agrobacterium infection. Increased percentage of embryos that formed callus (recovery of callus), reduced pigment production, and improved callus growth were observed by the addition of coconut water to the medium (Carvalho et al. 2004). Though the genotype P898012 is responsive to coconut water, its use in other genotypes may require different composition, since many genotypes did not respond to coconut water (Kaeppler and Pederson 1996). Various explants were used by Visarada et al. (2003) to explore genetic transformation of sorghum using Agrobacterium-mediated transformation resulting in transient gus expressions. However, immature embryos and calli derived from immature inflorescences were found to be ideal target tissues for obtaining high GUS expression. In a recent study by Wu et al. (2014), high transformation frequencies (10–33 %) were obtained through elevated copper sulfate and 6-benzylaminopurine in the resting and selection media by Agrobacterium infection of immature embryos using the genotype Tx430.
Optimal conditions were determined and baseline conditions in subsequent experiments were provided by Zhao et al. (2000) to achieve stable transformation of sorghum using Agrobacterium. It was observed that N6 medium not only decreased the callus response from embryos (76 % with MS and 20 % with N6) but also increased the production of phenolic pigments. The overall transformation frequency was 2.1 %. The optimization of media and other conditions for the transformation of sorghum using Agrobacterium was reported and a transformation frequency of 2.1 % was achieved. However, acetosyringone concentration was not optimized since a single concentration (100 μM) was used to induce vir operon.
Addition of amino acid L-cysteine in the plant tissue culture medium aided the recovery of putative transformants and improved the transient gus expression and stability of transformed explants (Sai Kishore et al. 2004). Production of transgenic sorghum plants through tailored in vitro protocols is possible in choice genotypes. However, decontamination of Agrobacterium by employing subtle treatments aided the recovery of transgenic plants in recalcitrant genotypes. In sorghum the resistant calli obtained after selection did not regenerate probably due to the toxic effects of decontaminating agents and selection pressure (Sai Kishore et al. 2011). Moreover, sweet sorghums secrete polyphenols into the culture medium leading to decrease in regeneration, which was overcome by frequent sub-culturing in the initial stages of post-transformation.
In planta method of Agrobacterium-mediated transformation helps in overcoming the hurdle of regeneration after selection. This method was demonstrated in sorghum by Elkonin et al. (2009) through the generation of transgenic plants and inheritance of the transgene to T 1 generation. Our research group developed a simplified method of in planta genetic transformation by a floral-dip method in sorghum, which does not involve vacuum infiltration and uses Agrobacterium suspension derived from solid cultures. Two independent transgenic sorghum lines were developed in sweet sorghum genotypes and the gene integration and expression were studied till T 5 generation. However, the expression of Bt protein in in planta derivatives was low. In planta method is simple, easy, and economic without the problem of regeneration after selection. Supplementation of agro-infiltration liquid with special components like L-cysteine and Tween-20 had a promotive effect on transformation (unpublished results).
Parameters were optimized for transformation by Agrobacterium-mediated and particle bombardment by Prasad Sant (2011) using the sorghum cultivars, viz., SA281, 296B, and Tx430. Agrobacterium strain LBA4404 at an inoculum density of 0.5 OD600nm, heat treatment at 43 °C for 3 min., inoculation media (pH 5.2) with the surfactant Pluronic F-68 (0.02 % w/v), and a 3-day cocultivation period in dark at 22 °C was found to be optimum resulting in high frequencies of transient GFP expression in immature embryos and callus derived from immature inflorescences. The optimum conditions for particle bombardment, viz., use of 3–7 day-old immature embryos and 4 week-old callus from immature inflorescences, pre- and post-bombardment osmoticum treatment of 4 h and 0.6 μm gold microparticles, 1,500 kPa helium pressure, and a target distance of 15 cm, resulted in transient GFP expression for up to 14, 30, and 50 days for SA281, 296B, and Tx430, respectively. Though particle bombardment resulted in less tissue necrosis compared to Agrobacterium-mediated transformation, no stable transformed plants were regenerated.
Both the systems of transformation, i.e., Agrobacterium and particle bombardment, though successful in sorghum, have their own merits and limitations. With Agrobacterium-based transformation, the higher transformation efficiency achieved so far ranged from 2.1 to 4.5 % (Howe et al. 2006; Gao et al. 2005b; Zhao et al. 2000). Effective method till date remains to be the microprojectile bombardment with higher transformation efficiency of 20.7 % (Liu and Godwin 2012).
In addition to the above mentioned methods of genetic transformation, pollen-mediated method was reported in sorghum by Wang et al. (2007), in which the plasmid DNA and pollen were submerged in a 0.3 mol/l sucrose solution, subjected to ultrasonication and then used for pollination of stigmas from the male sterile line A2V4A. Confirmation of gene integration was supported by the evidence of Southern blotting.
3 Tissue Culture and Regeneration
A wide range of sorghum explants, either for somatic embryogenesis or organogenesis, have been tested to establish a dependable tissue culture system for regeneration, which include mature embryos, immature embryos, immature inflorescences, seedlings, leaf fragments, and anthers. However, genetic transformation achieved in sorghum so far has been established with embryogenic cultures initiated from immature embryos or immature inflorescences. Maintenance of consistent quality of the callus on medium for an extended time (2–3 months or longer) and regeneration of fertile plants are essential for successful plant transformation.
MS medium supplemented with different combinations and concentrations of plant growth hormones were used by Pola et al. (2008) to culture immature embryos. Embryogenic callus was initiated on MS medium supplemented with 2 mg l−1 2,4-D and 0.5 mg l−1 kinetin; the addition of kinetin significantly enhanced embryogenesis. Proficiency in the development of embryogenic callus, induction of somatic embryo, and shoot regeneration was observed with 2 mg l−1 BAP. The regenerated shoots readily rooted on half-strength MS medium containing 1 mg l−1 NAA and were successfully transferred to the soil, which subsequently produced the seeds. Since the regeneration frequency of the bombarded calli derived from immature inflorescence is low, it is the least preferred explant (Kononowicz et al. 1995; Casas et al. 1997; Jogeswar et al. 2007). High-quality callus from immature inflorescence of sorghum genotypes is high, but the efficiency is still very low. It was improved to 1.01 to 3.33 % by modification of bombardment parameters (Brandao et al. 2012).
An attempt was made by Prasad Sant (2011) to establish an efficient and reproducible tissue culture and transformation system using five different sorghum cultivars, viz., SA281, 296B, SC49, Wray, and Rio. Regenerable embryogenic cell lines could be established only from SA281 and 296B. In addition, embryogenic cell lines were established using florets of immature inflorescence as explants from SA281, 296B, as well as Tx430 and regenerated using sorghum callus induction media (SCIM) and Vam’s wonderful regeneration media (VWRM) with the inflorescences from plants at the FL-2 stage (where the last fully opened leaf was two leaves away from the flag leaf) giving the best in vitro response. Moreover, the responses of immature inflorescences were robust in tissue culture and independent of season and growth condition. The optimum combination of plant growth regulator standardized for the micro-propagation of in vitro regenerated plantlets was 1.0 mg l−1 BAP and 0.5 mg l−1 NAA.
Apart from immature embryos and inflorescences, shoot tips from germinating seedlings are also widely used as explants in sorghum transformation (Girijashankar et al. 2005; Tadesse et al. 2003). Recently, an efficient protocol for regeneration in sorghum through somatic embryogenesis from shoot tip explants was developed by Amali et al. (2014) with the highest frequency of embryogenic callus formation (99 %), when explants were cultured on MS medium supplemented with 2.5 mg l−1 2,4-D, 0.25 mg l−1 kinetin and 500 mg l−1 of casein hydrolysate. Sub-culturing of embryogenic callus on MS medium supplemented with 2.5 mg l−1 2,4-D, 0.25 mg l−1 kinetin, 500 mg l−1 of casein hydrolysate, and 500 mg l−1 of L-proline resulted in the highest mean number of somatic embryos (33.3). The highest regeneration of plantlets (21.4 per embryogenic callus) was obtained in MS medium supplemented with 4 mg l−1 benzylaminopurine. A maximum number of roots (12.4) and root length (5.7 cm) were observed in half-strength MS medium supplemented with 1.0 mg l−1 indole-3-butyric acid and 0.8 g l−1 activated charcoal. The survival rates of in vitro grown plantlets transferred to greenhouse were up to 70 %, which were morphologically similar to in vivo plants.
Explants derived from meristematic tissues at the early stages of development are most amenable to tissue culture conditions (Sai Kishore et al. 2006). Highly uniform meristematic tissues are desirable for genetic transformation to minimize chimeras and somaclonal variants. Cultured immature embryos and shoot tips are the two explants of choice that have been predominantly used for sorghum genetic transformation. Two parental lines (CS3541 and 296B) that are less responsive to tissue culture were transformed by Visarada et al. (2014) by identifying the critical factors like 3d pre-cultured immature embryos as target tissues, small-size explants, treatment with L-cysteine during cocultivation, recovery of transformed embryos after antibiotic washes, and regeneration via multiple shoot bud induction.
The supply of immature inflorescences and embryos is not available throughout the season as sorghum flowering occurs for a few days only, thereby providing a small window for the collection of explants. To overcome this problem, Pola (2011) used leaf discs that will be available at any season for optimizing callus induction and regeneration. Efficient callus induction was obtained on MS media supplemented with 2 mg l−1 2,4,5-T and 1 mg l−1 NAA and 0.5 mg l−1 zeatin, while better shoot regeneration (62.2 ± 4.6 shoots per explants) was achieved in MS medium supplemented with 2.5 mg l−1 thidiazuron + 1.0 mg l−1 BAP and 0.5 mg l−1 IAA. Similarly, better root induction was observed with 1.0 mg l−1 NAA followed by their transfer to half-strength MS medium. Various reports on tissue culture techniques and different explants with regeneration ability in sorghum are presented in Table 9.2.
4 Marker Genes
The most widely used selectable markers in cereal transformation are the genes encoding hygromycin phosphotransferase (hpt), phosphinothricin acetyltransferase (pat or bar), and neomycin phosphotransferase II (nptII). Use of these marker genes under the control of constitutive promoters such as CaMV 35S promoter or the ubi1 promoter from maize works as efficiently for selection of Agrobacterium-transformed cells as for biolistic-mediated transformation. The positive selectable marker pmi (phosphomannose isomerase) has been shown to be effective in the transformation of many monocots including sorghum (Gao et al. 2005a). Expression of green fluorescence protein (gfp) on sorghum regeneration has been reported by Able et al. (2001) using particle bombardment, in which the distance between the rupture disk and target tissue, helium inlet aperture and pressure of helium gas, and age of tungsten and spermidine were studied. The sorghum genotype Tx430 yielded the most foci/callus in transient expression, while C401 was the least amenable for stable transformation. The use of gfp as a reporter for optimizing the transient expression during Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of sorghum was demonstrated by Jeoung et al. (2002). Using two different reporter genes, the suitability of different inbred lines (Tx430, C401, CO25) was determined using different promoters, type of explants, and inbreds during the early transformation process involving both biolistic and Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. The results indicated that gfp can be used effectively as a reporter for optimizing the conditions for successful transient expression during transformation with Agrobacterium.
Grain sorghum was transformed by Gao et al. (2005a) with a visual reporter gene (gfp) and a target gene (tlp), encoding thaumatin-like protein, and they reported the successful use of GFP screening for efficient production of stably transformed sorghum plants without using antibiotics or herbicides as selection agents. Transformation efficiency of 2.5 % was observed, which was greater than that reported earlier by Zhao et al. (2000). A dual-marker plasmid containing the selectable marker gene, manA, and the reporter gene, sgfp, was used to transform immature sorghum embryos by employing Agrobacterium-mediated transformation system (Gao et al. 2005b). Both the genes were under the control of a maize ubi1 promoter. The phosphomannose isomerase gene pmi was isolated from E. coli and used as the selectable marker gene and mannose was used as the selection agent. Necrotic calli were rarely observed in mannose selection and it had less negative effects on plant regeneration. Gene silencing of either the gfp gene or the tlp gene in T0 and T1 generations was not observed by Gao et al. (2005a, b). Stable transformation experiments in sorghum immature embryos of Tx430 and C2-97 genotypes were carried out by Howe et al. (2006) using a novel strain of A. tumefaciens (C58) implementing nptII as a selectable marker, resulting in transformation frequencies in the range of 0.3–4.5 % with an average transformation frequency of ~1 %.
In most reports on genetic transformation of sorghum, it was observed that the expression of introduced gus gene was either very poor or totally absent. GUS enzyme activities were very low in sorghum cells compared to other gus gene-transformed monocot cells (Hagio et al. 1991). The majority of the gus transformed cells did not stain blue upon incubation with histochemical substrate X-Gluc (Battraw and Hall 1991). Moreover, GUS activity that was high in transient assays could not be detected later than 3 weeks after bombardment (Casas et al. 1993, 1997) suggesting that methylation of transgene might have occurred in sorghum cells, leading to the inhibition of the expression of the reporter gene. Jeoung et al. (2002) studied the optimization of parameters for use of gfp and uidA as visual markers and evaluated different promoters. It revealed the order of promoter strength for GUS expression as ubi1 > CaMV 35S > act1 > adh1. Another reporter gene, luc, a firefly luciferase, was used in sorghum transformation studies by Kononowicz et al. (1995).
Five different selection markers, which include cat, npt II, hpt, bar, and manA, representing three broad categories of selection markers (antibiotic resistance, herbicide resistance, and nutrient assimilation), were utilized in sorghum transformation. The conversion of mannose to a metabolizable six-carbon source is beneficial to plants and is an efficient and non-destructive method of screening the transformed sorghum plants under in vitro conditions. Co-bombardment was performed by Liu and Godwin (2012) with nptII and gfp genes, both under the control of the maize ubi1 promoter using immature embryos of sorghum resulting in high transformation efficiency.
5 Economically Important Genes
Transgenic technology in sorghum is extended to combat biotic and abiotic stresses and to improve the quality. Agronomically important gene, chi ll, encoding rice chitinase under the constitutive CaMV 35S promoter was transferred to sorghum to impart resistance to stalk rot (Fusarium thapsinum) by Zhu et al. (1998) and Krishnaveni et al. (2001). Transgenics for resistance to anthracnose were reported by Kosambo-Ayoo et al. (2011). Transgenic sorghum plant expressing cry1Ac gene under the control of the wound-inducible promoter for the protection against spotted stem borer was reported in the cultivar BTx623 through microprojectile bombardment of shoot apices after selection and regeneration through embryogenic pathway (Girijashankar et al. 2005). The study showed that the mpiC1 promoter from maize is functional in sorghum and drives the expression of cry1Ac gene, but at low levels to confer partial protection against the neonate larvae of the spotted stem borer. In another study, the T0 transgenic plants generated using ubi1–cry1Ab and ubi1–cry1Ac were found to be chimeric in nature, which may be due to the lack of the transgene cry in the reproductive parts (Girijashankar and Swathisree 2009). Promising Bt transgenic possessing cry1Aa gene conferring resistance to stem borer in the grain sorghum genotype M 35-1 was reported by Ratnala (2013). Transgenic sweet sorghum derivatives through backcross breeding using a promising transgenic event in the genotype M 35-1 were developed recently by Indukuri (2014), which showed promising levels of resistance in whole-plant bioassays for Chilo partellus. Transgenic sweet sorghum plants in the genetic background of SSV84 and RSSV9 were generated through particle bombardment and in planta method of Agrobacterium, which exhibited moderate to low levels of resistance in insect feed assays in the laboratory (Visarada et al. 2013). Transgenic sorghum expressing two different classes of Bt toxin proteins, Cry1Aa and Cry1B, in two elite and recalcitrant genotypes (CS3541 and 296B) was developed, which showed high levels of expression (35–500 ng/g protein) with commensurate resistance to stem borer (Visarada et al. 2014). Transgenic sorghum plants possessing cry1C gene showed 10–13 % leaf damage and 97–100 % larval mortality in the insect bioassays with Chilo partellus neonate larvae (Ignacimuthu and Premkumar 2014). Promising transgenic lines were identified in the field trials for resistance to stem borer by Balakrishna et al (2013).
High-lysine sorghum lines were generated by Tadesse et al. (2003) in the genetic background of the Ethiopian genotype 214856 through the over-expression of dhdps-raec1 mutated gene, which encodes the insensitive form of the dihydrodipicolinate synthase, the key regulatory enzyme of the lysine pathway. Marker-free transgenic sorghum plants harboring lysyl tRNA synthetase gene for enhanced lysine content in sorghum seed was developed by Lu et al. (2009). Contrary to the expectation, introduction of glycine-rich RNA-binding protein gene atRZ-1a from Arabidopsis, Bcl-2 mRNA sequence 725–1,428 representing the 3′ non-coding region of the gene from humans and rice Ca-dependent protein kinase 7 (OsCDPK7) could not improve the cold tolerance in sorghum (Mall 2010). Transgenic sorghum events expressing HMW-GS showed improvement in protein digestibility of the uncooked ground grain, and the downregulation of alpha kafirin showed the presence of distorted protein bodies in the transgenic seed (Mall 2010).
The lysine content of sorghum grain was increased by Tadesse and Jacobs (2004) through the introduction of a mutated dhdps-rl gene encoding a feedback-insensitive dihydrodipicolinate synthetase enzyme by microprojectile bombardment of immature embryos and shoot tips leading to accumulation of more amount of lysine. The dhdps-raec1 mutated gene encodes an insensitive form of the dihydrodipicolinate synthase, the key regulatory enzyme of the lysine pathway. The over-expression of this gene could lead to the elevated lysine content in sorghum and improvement of nutritional quality of this crop. Lu et al. (2009) reported transgenic sorghum plants harboring a modified tRNAlys, and sorghum lys1 tRNA synthase elements for improving the lysine content in sorghum seeds. However, there was no mention on the expression of the lysine gene or amino acid content.
To impart resistance to abiotic stresses like drought, HVA1 gene from barley was inserted into the sorghum genome through biolistic transformation by Devi et al. (2004), which accumulated barley 3 LEA protein under induced stress. Sorghum line SPV462 was transformed with the mtlD gene encoding for mannitol-1-phosphate dehydrogenase from E. coli to enhance tolerance to water deficit and NaCl stress (Maheswari et al. 2010). Transgenic sorghum plants maintained a 1.7–2.8-fold higher shoot and root growth, respectively, at 200 mM NaCl stress compared to untransformed control plants and demonstrated that the engineering mannitol biosynthetic pathway into sorghum can impart enhanced tolerance to water deficit and salinity. Transgenic sweet sorghum with altered lignin content was obtained by manipulating the expression of caffeoyl-CoA-O-methyltransferase (CCoAOMT) and caffeic acid-O-methyltransferase (COMT) toward production of easily degradable plant material for biofuel production (Basu et al. 2007). A young forage crop of sorghum produces HCN in the leaf tissues proving toxic to animals on grazing. Low HCN transgenic forage lines containing safe levels (<200 ppm) of HCN were developed by Pandey et al. (2010) through downregulation of dhurrin gene.
6 Transformation Efficiency
High-efficient transformation systems are essential for GM product development as well as gene expression studies. Much effort was applied to extend the host range of Agrobacterium to monocotyledonous species. Agrobacterium infection of seedlings/immature embryos of cereal species was employed to evaluate the competency of these explants under various conditions. Following this Agrobacterium-mediated transformation, protocols were developed for many important monocotyledonous crops. Transformation frequency was improved when the parameters were further optimized, by modification of medium components and optimization of coculture and resting timing periods and by the addition of Agrobacterium growth-inhibiting agent or bactericide such as silver nitrate. Inclusion of silver nitrate in coculture medium enhanced stable transformation in maize (Zhao et al. 2001). Silver nitrate significantly suppressed the Agrobacterium growth during coculture without compromising T-DNA delivery and subsequent T-DNA integration. The suppressed Agrobacterium growth on the target explants could facilitate plant cell recovery and resulted in increased efficiency of transformation (Cheng et al. 2003).
To date, the published reports of successful monocot transformation via Agrobacterium used only three different strains, i.e., LBA 4404, disarmed C58, and EHA 101 and its derivatives (EHA105, AGL0, and AGL1). Anti-necrotic compounds such as ascorbic acid, cysteine, and silver nitrate for preincubation of the explants were emphasized to be useful for efficient transformation. Super-virulent strains or superbinary vectors and acetosyringone in inoculation and coculture media were suggested to be important for efficient transformation in cereal species. Chemicals such as acetosyringone for vir induction are recommended in most of the cereal transformation protocols. Antibiotics such as cefotaxime, carbenicillin, and timentin have been used regularly in the Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of cereal crops following coculture to suppress or eliminate Agrobacterium. Cefotaxime worked well in Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of rice and maize initially, and later it was found that cefotaxime at a concentration of 250 mg l−1 had a detrimental effect to maize callus (Ishida et al. 1996). Zhao et al. (2000, 2001) used carbenicillin (100 mg l−1) in their experiments on sorghum and maize. Hill-Ambroz and Weeks (2001) studied the expression levels of various constitutive promoters in sorghum.
Removal of myoinositol from the callus culture media in combination with a cold-shock pretreatment and the addition of L-Gln prior to and during Agrobacterium infection resulted in about 84 % of the treated calli being stably transformed in Lolium (Zhang et al. 2013). Omission of myoinositol from the callus culture media was associated with the failure of certain pathogenesis-related genes to be induced after Agrobacterium infection. The addition of a cold-shock and supplemental Gln appeared to have synergistic effects on infection and transformation efficiencies. Nearly 60 % of the stably transformed calli regenerated into green plantlets. It is now possible to transform even difficult monocots using tailor-made gene constructs and promoters, suitable A. tumefaciens strains, and a proper understanding of the entire process of efficient regeneration (Sood et al. 2011). Still, there are many challenges to reach high-efficient transformation systems in sorghum that require genotype-independent regeneration and transformation methods.
7 Future Prospects
Despite the advances in technology, the transgenic sorghum is not released for cultivation. Innovative genetic modifications are developed to keep away from the classification of GMOs and biosafety concerns. These modifications such as zinc finger nuclease technology, cisgenesis, RdDM, and other technologies are dependent on transgenic technology for the introduction of DNA segments. Genotype-independent and high-throughput transformation systems are the key challenges to attain highly efficient genetic transformation of sorghum. Site-directed integration of transgenes in sorghum can be a reality with the complete sequence of sorghum genome available. Apart from this, selection of effective events plays an equally important role for transgenic sorghum to see the farmer fields. Science and the arts of tissue culture, genetic transformation, and, more importantly, plant breeding have to be integrated to reach effective transgenics of sorghum. There is growing interest in including sorghum as health food to alleviate the lifestyle disorders. With the research partnerships involving public and private organizations, we can anticipate improvement of sorghum nutritional quality with enhanced levels of vitamins, minerals, and protein and also tolerance to biotic and abiotic stresses leading to the genetic improvement of sorghum in the coming years.
References
Able JA, Rathus C, Godwin ID (2001) The investigation of optimal bombardment parameters for transient and stable transgene expression in sorghum. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 37:341–348
Amali P, Kingsley SJ, Ignacimuthu S (2014) Enhanced plant regeneration involving somatic embryogenesis from shoot tip explants of Sorghum bicolor (L. Moench). Asian J Plant Sci Res 4(3):26–34
Balakrishna D, Vinod R, Vijaya I, Padmaja PG, Venkatesh Bhat B, Patil JV (2013) Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation of sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] using synthetic CRY1B gene. In: Proceedings of the global consultation on Millets promotion for health and nutritional security, Directorate of Sorghum Research, Hyderabad, 18–20 December 2013, pp 284
Basu A, Maiti MK, Kar S, Sen SK, Pandey B (2007) Transgenic sweet sorghum with altered lignin composition and process of preparation thereof. Nagarjuna Private Limited, Hyderabad, India. Patent no. WO/2008/102241
Battraw M, Hall TC (1991) Stable transformation of Sorghum bicolor protoplasts with chimeric neomycin phosphotransferase II and b-glucuronidase genes. Theor Appl Genet 82:161–168
Bhaskaran S, Smith RH, Paliwal S, Schertz KF (1987) Somaclonal variation from Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench. cell culture. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 9:189–196
Brandão RL, Carneiro NP, de Oliveira AC, Coelho GTCP, Carneiro AA (2012) Genetic transformation of immature sorghum inflorescence via microprojectile bombardment. In: Yelda Ozden Çiftçi (ed) Transgenic plants – advances and limitations, PhD., In Tech, China
Cai T, Butler L (1990) Plant regeneration from embryogenic callus initiated from immature inflorescences of several high-tannin sorghums. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 20:101–110
Cai T, Daly B, Butler L (1987) Callus induction and plant regeneration from shoot portions of mature embryos of high tannin sorghum. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 9:245–252
Carvalho CHS, Zehr UB, Gunaratna N, Anderson J, Kononowicz HH, Hodges TK, Axtell JD (2004) Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of sorghum: factors that affect transformation efficiency. Genet Mol Biol 27:259–269
Casas AM, Kononowicz AK, Zehr UB, Tomes DT, Axtell JD, Butler LG, Bressan RA, Hasegawa PM (1993) Transgenic sorghum plants via microprojectile bombardment. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 90:11212–11216
Casas AM, Kononowicz AK, Haan TG, Zhang L, Tomes DT, Bressan RA, Hasegawa PM (1997) Transgenic sorghum plants obtained after microprojectile bombardment of immature inflorescences. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 33:92–100
Cheng M, Hu T, Layton J, Liu CN, Fry JE (2003) Desiccation of plant tissues post- Agrobacterium infection enhances T-DNA delivery and increases stable transformation efficiency in wheat. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 39:595–604
Devi P, Zhong H, Sticklen M (2004) Production of Transgenic sorghum plants with related HVA1 gene. In: Seetharama N, Godwin ID (eds) Sorghum tissue culture and transformation. Oxford Publishers, New Delhi, pp 75–79
Elkonin LA, Pakhomova NV (2000) Influence of nitrogen and phosphorus on induction embryogenic callus of sorghum. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 61:115–123
Elkonin LA, Ravin NV, Leshko EV, Volokhina IV, Chumakov MI, Skryabin AG (2009) In planta agrobacterial transformation of sorghum plants. Biotekhnologiya 1:23–30
Emani C, Sunilkumar G, Rathore KS (2002) Transgene silencing and reactivation in sorghum. Plant Sci 162:181–192
Gao Z, Jayaraj J, Muthukrishnan S, Claflin L, Liang GH (2005a) Efficient genetic transformation of sorghum using a visual screening marker. Genome 48:321–333
Gao Z, Xie X, Ling Y, Muthukrishnan S, Liang GH (2005b) Agrobacterium tumefaciens mediated sorghum transformation using a mannose selection system. Plant Biotechnol J 3:591–599
Gendy C, Sene M, Van Le B, Vidal J, Van Tran TK (1996) Somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration in Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench. Plant Cell Rep 15:900–904
Girijashankar V, Swathisree V (2009) Genetic transformation of Sorghum bicolor. Physiol Mol Biol Plant 15(4):287–302
Girijashankar V, Sharma HC, Sharma KK et al (2005) Development of transgenic sorghum for insect resistance against the spotted stem borer (Chilo partellus). Plant Cell Rep 24(9):513–522
Grootboom AW, O’Kennedy MM, Mkhonza NL, Kunert K, Chakauya E, Chikwamba RK (2008) In vitro culture and plant regeneration of sorghum genotypes using immature zygotic embryos as explant source. Int J Bot 4:450–455
Grootboom AW, Mkhonza NL, O’Kennedy MM, Chakauya E, Kunert K, Chikwamba RK (2010) Biolistic mediated sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) transformation via Mannose and Bialaphos based selection systems. Int J Bot 6(2):89–94
Gupta S, Khanna VK, Singh R, Garg GK (2006) Strategies for overcoming genotypic limitations of in vitro regeneration and determination of genetic components of variability of plant regeneration traits in sorghum. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 86:379–388
Gurel S, Gurel E, Kaur R, Wong J, Meng L, Tan HQ, Lemaux PG (2009) Efficient reproducible Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of sorghum using heat treatment of immature embryos. Plant Cell Rep 28(3):429–444
Hagio T (2002) Adventitious shoot regeneration from immature embryos of sorghum. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 68:65–72
Hagio T, Blowers AD, Earle ED (1991) Stable transformation of sorghum cell cultures after bombardment with DNA coated microprojectiles. Plant Cell Rep 10(5):260–264
Harshavardhan D, Rani TS, Ugalanathan K, Seetharama N (2002) An improved protocol for regeneration of Sorghum bicolor from isolated shoot apices. Plant Biotechnol 19(3):163–171
Hill-Ambroz KL, Weeks JT (2001) Comparison of constitutive promoters for sorghum transformation. Cereal Res Commun 29:17–24
Howe A, Sato S, Dweikat I, Fromm M, Clemente T (2006) Rapid and reproducible Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of sorghum. Plant Cell Rep 25(8):784–791
Ignacimuthu S, Premkumar A (2014) Development of transgenic Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench resistant to the Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) through Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. Mol Biol Genet Eng. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.7243/2053-5767-2-1
Indukuri V (2014) Introgression of cry1B gene into sweet sorghum (SSV 84) by marker-assisted backcross breeding. Department of Botany, Andhra University, Waltair
Ishida Y, Saito H, Ohta S, Hiei Y, Komari T, Kumashiro T (1996) High efficiency transformation of maize (Zea mays L.) mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Nat Biotechnol 14(6):745–750
Jeoung JM, Krishnaveni S, Muthukrishnan S, Trick HN, Liang GH (2002) Optimization of sorghum transformation parameters using genes for green fluorescent protein and beta–glucuronidase as visual markers. Hereditas 137(1):20–28
Jogeswar G, Ranadheer D, Anjaiah V, Kavi Kishor PB (2007) High frequency somatic embryogenesis and regeneration in different genotypes of Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench from immature inflorescence explants. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 43:159–166
Kaeppler HF, Pederson JF (1996) Media effects on phenotype of callus cultures initiated from photoperiod-insensitive, elite inbred sorghum lines. Maydica 41(2):83–89
Kaeppler HF, Pederson JF (1997) Evaluation of 41 elite and exotic inbred sorghum genotypes for high quality callus production. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 48:71–75
Kononowicz AK, Casas AM, Tomes DT, Bressan RA, Hasegawa PM (1995) New vistas are opened for sorghum improvement by genetic transformation. Afr Crop Sci J 3(2):171–180
Kosambo-Ayoo LM, Bader M, Loerz H, Becker D (2011) Transgenic sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) developed by transformation with chitinase and chitosanase genes from Trichoderma harzianum expresses tolerance to anthracnose. Afr J Biotechnol 10:3659–3670
Krishnaveni S, Jeoung JM, Muthukrishnan S, Liang GH (2001) Transgenic sorghum plants constitutively expressing a rice chitinase gene show improved resistance to stalk rot. J Genet Breed 55:151–158
Kumar V, Campbell LM, Rathore KS (2011) Rapid recovery and characterization of transformants following Agrobacterium-mediated T-DNA transfer to sorghum. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 104:137–146
Liu G, Godwin ID (2012) Highly efficient sorghum transformation. Plant Cell Rep 31(6):999–1007
Lu L, Wu X, Yin X, Morrand J, Chen X, Folk WR, Zhang ZJ (2009) Development of marker-free transgenic sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] using standard binary vectors with bar as a selectable marker. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 99:97–108
Maheswari M, Varalaxmi Y, Vijayalakshmi A, Yadav SK, Sharmila P, Venkateswarlu B, Vanaja M, Saradhi PP (2010) Metabolic engineering using mtlD gene enhances tolerance to water deficit and salinity in sorghum. Biol Plant 54(4):647–652
Mall TK (2010) Evaluation of novel input output traits in sorghum through biotechnology. Dissertation, Agronomy, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska
Murty UR, Visarada AA, Bharathi M (1990a) Developing tissue culture system for sorghum, Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench. embryogenic callus induction from elite genotypes. Cereal Res Commun 18(3):257–262
Murty UR, Visarada AA, Bharathi M (1990b) Developing tissue culture system for sorghum, Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench. plant regeneration from embryogenic callus. Cereal Res Commun 18(4):355–358
Mythili PK, Seetharama N, Reddy VD (1999) Plant regeneration from embryogenic cell suspension cultures of wild sorghum (Sorghum dimidiatum Stapf.). Plant Cell Rep 18:424–428
Nguyen TV, Thu TT, Claeys M, Angenon G (2007) Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) using an improved in vitro regeneration system. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 91:155–164
Oldach KH, Morgenstern A, Rother S, Girgi M, O’Kennedy MM, Lorz H (2001) Efficient in vitro plant regeneration from immature zygotic embryos of pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.] and Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench. Plant Cell Rep 20(5):416–421
Pandey AK, Bhat BV, Balakrishna D, Seetharama N (2010) Genetic transformation of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench.). Int J Biotech Biochem 6(1):45–53
Pola S (2011) Leaf discs as a source material for plant tissue culture studies of Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench. Notulae Scientia Biologicae 3(1):70–78
Pola S, Sarada Mani N, Ramana T (2007) Enhanced shoot regeneration in tissue culture studies of Sorghum bicolor. J Agric Technol 3:275–286
Pola S, Sarada Mani N, Ramana T (2008) Plant tissue culture studies in Sorghum bicolor: immature embryo explants as the source material. Int J Plant Prod 2:1–14
Pola S, Sarada Mani N, Ramana T (2009) Long-term maintenance of callus cultures from immature embryo of Sorghum bicolor. World J Agric Sci 5(4):415–421
Prasad Sant RR (2011) Development of a transformation system for sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.). Ph.D. thesis, Centre for Tropical Crops and Biocommodities, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia
Raghuwanshi A, Birch RG (2010) Genetic transformation of sweet sorghum. Plant Cell Rep 29(9):997–1005
Raju RK, Nagaraju K, Annapurna A, Srinivas R, Gawali HS, Rao SV, Visarada KBRS (2007) Simple methods to generate ample explant sources for genetic transformation of sorghum. In: Poster presented at 8th agricultural science congress held during 15–17 Feb. 2007 at Tamil Nadu Agricultural University (TNAU), Coimbatore, India
Rao AM, Padma Sree K, Kavikishore PB (1995) Enhanced plant regeneration in grain and sweet sorghum by asparagine, praline and cefotaxime. Plant Cell Rep 15:72–75
Rathus C, Nguyen T, Able JA, Gray SJ, Godwin ID (2004) Optimizing sorghum transformation technology via somatic embryogenesis. In: Seetharama N, Godwin ID (eds) Sorghum tissue culture, transformation and genetic engineering. ICRISAT and Oxford Publishers, New Delhi
Ratnala V (2013) Genetic transformation of sorghum for stem borer resistance using cry1Aa gene via Agrobacterium-mediated approach. Dissertation, Department of Botany, Andhra University, Waltair, India
Rose JB, Dunwell JM, Sunderland N (1986) Anther culture of Sorghum bicolor. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 6:15–32
Sai Kishore N, Aravinda Lakshmi Y, Pashupatinath E, Ramana Kumari B, Balakrishna D, Rao SV, Seetharama N, Visarada KBRS (2004) A simple system to transgenic sorghum using shoot apical meristem. In: Proceedings of the national symposium biohorizon 2004, 12–13 March, 2004, IIT, Delhi, New Delhi, India
Sai Kishore N, Visarada KBRS, Aravinda Lakshmi Y, Pashupatinath E, Rao SV, Seetharama N (2006) In vitro culture methods in sorghum with shoot tip as the explant material. Plant Cell Rep 25(3):174–182
Sai Kishore N, Visarada KBRS, Rao SV, Seetharama N (2011) Progress and prospects for Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation in sorghum in comparison to other cereals. Transgenic Plant J 5(1):27–34
Sairam RV, Seetharama N, Devi PS, Verma A, Murthy UR, Potrykus I (1999) Culture and regeneration of mesophyll derived protoplasts of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench). Plant Cell Rep 18:972–977
Seetharama N, Sairam RV, Rani TS (2000) Regeneration of sorghum from shoot tip cultures and field performance of the progeny. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 61:169–173
Smith RH, Bhaskaran S, Schertz K (1983) Sorghum plant regeneration from aluminum selection medium. Plant Cell Rep 2(3):129–132
Sood P, Bhattacharya A, Sood A (2011) Problems and possibilities of monocot transformation. Biol Plant 55:1–15
Syamala D, Devi P (2003) Efficient regeneration of sorghum, Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench, from shoot-tip explant. Indian J Exp Biol 41(12):1482–1486
Tadesse Y, Jacobs M (2004) Nutritional quality improvement of sorghum through genetic transformation. In: Seetharama N, Godwin ID (eds) Sorghum tissue culture and transformation. Oxford Publishers, New Delhi, pp 81–84
Tadesse Y, Sagi L, Swennen R, Jacobs M (2003) Optimization of transformation conditions and production of transgenic sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) via microprojectile bombardment. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 75:1–18
Urriola J, Rathore KS (2014) Temporal and spatial activities of a rice glutelin promoter in transgenic sorghum. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 116:227–234
Visarada KBRS, Sai Kishore N, Balakrishna D, Rao SV (2003) Transient gus expression studies in sorghum to develop a simple protocol for Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation. J Genet Breed 57:147–154
Visarada KBRS, Rajani G, Prasad GS, Royer M (2013) Development of transgenic sweet sorghum for tolerance to stem borer. Sorghum Times 9:6
Visarada KBRS, Padmaja PG, Sai Kishore N, Pashupatinath E, Royer M, Seetharama N, Patil JV (2014) Production and evaluation of transgenic sorghum for resistance to stem borer. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 50:176–189
Wang W, Wang J, Yang C, Li Y, Liu L, Xu J (2007) Pollen-mediated transformation of Sorghum bicolor plants. Biotechnol Appl Biochem 48:79–83
Wu E, Lenderts B, Glassman K, Berezowska-Kaniewska M, Christensen H, Asmus T, Zhen S, Chu U, Cho MJ, Zhao ZY (2014) Optimized Agrobacterium-mediated sorghum transformation protocol and molecular data of transgenic sorghum plants. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 50:9–18
Zhang W, Dewey R, Boss W, Phillippy B, Qu R (2013) Enhanced Agrobacterium-mediated transformation efficiencies in monocot cells is associated with attenuated defense responses. Plant Mol Biol 81:273–286
Zhao ZY, Cai T, Tagliani L et al (2000) Agrobacterium-mediated sorghum transformation. Plant Mol Biol 44(6):789–798
Zhao ZY, Gu W, Cai T, Tagliani L, Hondred D, Bond D, Schroeder S, Rudert M, Pierce D (2001) High throughput genetic transformation mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens in maize. Mol Breed 8:323–333
Zhao L, Liu S, Song S (2010) Optimization of callus induction and plant regeneration from germinating seeds of sweet sorghum (Sorghum bicolor Moench). Afr J Biotechnol 9(16):2367–2374
Zhong H, Wang W, Sticklen M (1998) In vitro morphogenesis of Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench: efficient plant regeneration from shoot apices. J Plant Physiol 153(5–6):719–726
Zhu H, Muthukrishnan S, Krishnaveni S, Wilde G, Jeoung JM, Liang GH (1998) Biolistic transformation of sorghum using a rice chitinase gene. J Genet Breed 52(3):243–252
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer India
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Visarada, K.B.R.S., Sai Kishore, N. (2015). Advances in Genetic Transformation. In: Madhusudhana, R., Rajendrakumar, P., Patil, J. (eds) Sorghum Molecular Breeding. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2422-8_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2422-8_9
Publisher Name: Springer, New Delhi
Print ISBN: 978-81-322-2421-1
Online ISBN: 978-81-322-2422-8
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)