Abstract
Cucurbits are vegetable crops belonging to the family Cucurbitaceae. The family consists of about 118 genera and 825 species. These crops are important sources of livelihood securities for resource poor farmers and can be grown in varied agroclimates ranging from temperate, subtropical, tropical, and arid deserts. Recently, cultivation of crops including cucurbits is confronted with biotic and abiotic stresses caused by global climate change. It is argued that increased CO2 concentration has beneficial effect on productivities of several crops when studied in isolation. However, under field conditions, the interaction between CO2 concentration and increased temperature needs to be investigated in details. Pressure of biotic stresses is also likely to increase due to climate change. Wild relatives of cucurbits are also equally impacted by rise in temperatures. It is feared that important species of many crops possessing valuable gene pools will be on the verge of extinction in the near future. The grave ramifications of climate change can be circumvented with a combination of effective climate protection and adaptation measures. Climate protection measures are well established in the Kyoto Protocol to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change. Possible adaptation measures for cucurbits are weather forecasts, simulation models, breeding short duration varieties, breeding heat- and drought-tolerant varieties, and agronomic manipulations. Developing stress-tolerant/stress-avoiding varieties and appropriate production technologies in cucurbits have a great potential to contribute to food and livelihood security in vulnerable agricultural environments.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
13.1 Introduction
Cucurbits are vegetable crops belonging to family Cucurbitaceae. The family consists of about 118 genera and 825 species. There is tremendous genetic diversity within the family, and the range of adaptation for cucurbit species includes tropical and subtropical regions, arid deserts, and temperate regions. Cucurbits are consumed in various forms, i.e., salad (cucumber, gherkins, long melon), sweet (ash gourd, pointed gourd), pickles (gherkins), deserts (melons), and culinary purpose. Some of them, e.g., bitter gourd, are well known for their unique medicinal properties. In recent years, abortifacient proteins with ribosome-inhibiting properties have been isolated from several cucurbit species, which include momordicin (from Momordica charantia), trichosanthin (from Trichosanthes kirilowii), and beta-trichosanthin (from Trichosanthes cucumeroides). In India, a number of major and minor cucurbits are cultivated in several commercial cropping systems and also as popular kitchen garden crops. Cucurbits share about 5.6% of the total vegetable production in India. Cucurbits are cultivated in all parts of India under varied agroclimatic conditions. Like other crops, cucurbits are also sensitive to climate change and various abiotic stresses.
13.2 Possible Impact of Climate Change on Agriculture Including Vegetables
Despite technological advances like improved varieties, fertilizers, irrigation systems, and biotechnology, weather is still the key determining factor for agricultural productivity. The possible impacts of climate change on agriculture including vegetables are given below.
-
1.
Increase in temperature increases transpiration and in drier regions leads to water stress causing yield reduction. In India, only about 41% area is irrigated and remaining 59% is rainfed. Even if we realize full irrigation potential in the country, nearly 50% area will still remain rainfed. Under such circumstances, increase in temperatures and changes in rainfall patterns are likely to reduce agricultural productivity in rainfed areas.
-
2.
The changed climate will probably lead to a decrease in crop productivity, but with important regional differences (McCarty et al. 2001). In tropical and subtropical regions like in India where the crops are already near the limit of their temperature tolerance, even a slight increase in temperature will result in drastic fall in crop productivity. However, crop productivity is expected to rise slightly in mid- to high latitudes for mean temperature increases of up to 3°C. Coupled with enhanced CO2 concentration, food productivity in these areas is expected to rise with rise in temperature up to 3°C and fall with further rise in temperature.
-
3.
High temperature increases the rate of development in plants. A short life cycle, though less productive, can be beneficial for escaping drought and frost and late maturing cultivars could benefit from faster development rate. In colder regions, global warming could lead to longer of growth period and optimal assimilation at elevated temperatures.
-
4.
Droughts, floods, tropical cyclones, heavy precipitation, and heat waves will negatively impact agricultural production.
-
5.
Due to melting of glaciers, global sea levels are likely to rise from anywhere between 180 and 590 mm by end of this century leading to loss of land, coastal erosion, flooding, and salinization of ground water. Rapid melting of glaciers in Himalayas could affect availability of water for irrigation especially in the Indo-Gangetic plains as well as neighboring countries.
-
6.
The current fertilizer-use efficiency that ranges between 2% and 50% in India is likely to be reduced further with increasing temperatures. Greater fertilizer use to boost agricultural production will in turn lead to higher emission of greenhouse gases.
-
7.
Small changes in temperature and rainfall will have significant impact on quality of fruits and vegetables with resultant implications in domestic and external trade.
-
8.
Changes in temperature and humidity will also change pest (diseases and insects) population. New and aggressive pests including weeds are likely to invade our crops.
13.3 Adaptation Strategies for Cucurbitaceous Vegetables
Farmers in developing countries including India need adaptive tools to manage the adverse effects of climate change on agricultural productivity and particularly on vegetable production and quality. Adaptation involves the action that people take in response to or in anticipation of projected or actual changes in climate to reduce adverse impacts and also derive advantage from the opportunities posed by climate change (Parry et al. 2005). However, farmers in our country are usually small-holders and rely heavily on resources available in their farms or within their communities. Thus, technologies that are simple, affordable, and accessible must be developed to increase the resilience of Indian farms. Various management practices are available that have potential to grow vegetables successfully under hot and wet conditions of the lowland tropics. Potential impacts of climate change on agricultural production will depend not only on climate per se, but also on the internal dynamics of agricultural systems, including their ability to adapt to the changes (FAO 2001). Different strategies for climate change adaptation include development of resilient varieties, modifying fertilizer application to enhance nutrient availability to plants, direct delivery of water to roots (drip irrigation), grafting to increase flood and disease tolerance, and use of soil amendments to improve soil fertility and enhance nutrient uptake by plants. Some of the potential adaptive measures for cucurbitaceous vegetables are described below.
13.3.1 Development of Climate-Resilient Varieties
13.3.1.1 Breeding Strategies
Improved germplasm is the most cost-effective option for farmers to meet the challenges of a changing climate. While breeding for high yields, we have been counter selecting genotypes that are water and fertilizer responsive. Superior varieties adapted to a wider range of climatic conditions could result from the discovery of novel genetic variation for tolerance to different biotic and abiotic stresses. Genotypes with improved attributes conditioned by superior combinations of alleles at multiple loci could be identified and advanced. Improved selection techniques are needed to identify these superior genotypes and associated traits, especially from wild and related species that grow in environments which do not support the growth of improved high yielding varieties. Plants native to climates with marked seasonality are able to acclimatize more easily to variable environmental conditions and provide opportunities to identify genes or gene combinations which confer such resilience.
13.3.1.2 Development of Genotypes Resistant/Tolerant to Diseases and Insect Pests
Large gene pool is available in Cucurbitaceae family which can be utilized for the development of pest-tolerant/-resistant varieties or elite breeding lines in cucumber, muskmelon, watermelon, and other important cucurbitaceous vegetable crops. The resistant sources identified in important cucurbits are given Table 13.1.
13.3.1.3 Development of Genotypes Tolerant to Drought
Plants resist water or drought stress in many ways. In slowly developing water deficit, plants may escape drought stress by shortening their life cycle (Chaves and Oliveira 2004). However, the oxidative stress of rapid dehydration is very damaging to the photosynthetic processes, and the capacity for energy dissipation and metabolic protection against reactive oxygen species is the key to survival under drought conditions (Ort 2001; Chaves and Oliveira 2004). Tissue tolerance to severe dehydration is not common in crop plants but is found in species native to extremely dry environments (Ingram and Bartels 1996). Some Cucurbita sp. possess some xerophytic characters essential to adapt under water scarcity conditions. This gene pool should be thoroughly studied to isolate drought-tolerant lines in pumpkin and squash. Drought stress is a major environmental factor influencing plant growth and development. Citrullus colocynthis is highly drought-tolerant cucurbit species with a deep root system. Differences in gene expression during drought were studied using cDNA-AFLP. Two genes, CcrbohD and CcrbohF, encoding respiratory burst oxidase proteins were cloned using RACE. RT-PCR analysis showed that expression of CcrbohD was rapidly and strongly induced by abiotic stress imposed by PEG, ABA, SA, and JA treatment. CcrbohD has great promise for improving drought tolerance of other cucurbit species.
13.3.1.4 Development of Genotypes Tolerant to Salinity
Attempts to improve the salt tolerance of crops through conventional breeding programs have very limited success due to the genetic and physiologic complexity of this trait (Flowers 2004). In addition, tolerance to saline conditions is a developmentally regulated, stage-specific phenomenon; tolerance at one stage of plant development does not always correlate with tolerance at other stages (Foolad 2004). Success in breeding for salt tolerance requires effective screening methods, existence of genetic variability, and ability to transfer the genes to the species of interest. Screening for salt tolerance in the field is not a recommended practice because of the variable levels of salinity in field soils. Screening should be done in soil-less culture with nutrient solutions of known salt concentrations (Cuartero and Fernandez-Munoz 1999).
13.3.2 Strategies for Water Economy
13.3.2.1 Irrigation Methods
The quality and efficiency of water management determine the yield and quality of vegetable products. The optimum frequency and amount of applied water is a function of climatic and weather conditions, crop species, variety, stage of growth and rooting characteristics, soil water retention capacity and texture, irrigation system, and management factors (Phene et al. 1985). Too much or too little water causes abnormal plant growth, predisposes plants to infection by pathogens, and causes nutritional disorders. If water is scarce and supplies are erratic or variable, then timely irrigation and conservation of soil moisture reserves are the most important agronomic interventions to maintain yields during drought stress. There are several methods of applying irrigation water, and the choice depends on the crop, water availability, soil characteristics, and topography. Application of irrigation water could be through overhead, surface, drip, or subirrigation systems. Surface irrigation methods are utilized in more than 80% of the world’s irrigated lands, yet its field level application efficiency is often 40–50% (Von Westarp and Chieng 2004). Drip irrigation delivers water directly to plants through small plastic tubes due to which water losses due to run off and percolation are minimized and water savings of 50–80% are achieved when compared to most traditional surface irrigation methods. Thus, more plants can be irrigated per unit of water by drip irrigation, and with less labor. In Nepal, cauliflower yields using low-cost drip irrigation were not significantly different from those achieved by hand watering; however, the long-term economic and labor benefits were greater using the low-cost drip irrigation (Von Westarp and Chieng 2004). The water-use efficiency in chili pepper was significantly higher in drip irrigation compared to furrow irrigation, with higher efficiencies observed in high delivery rate drip irrigation regimes (AVRDC 2005). For drought-tolerant crop like watermelon, yield differences between furrow and drip irrigated crops were not significantly different; however, the incidence of Fusarium wilt was reduced when a lower drip irrigation rate was used. In general, the use of low-cost drip irrigation is cost-effective and labor-saving and allows more plants to be grown per unit of water, thereby both saving water and increasing farmers’ incomes at the same time.
13.3.2.2 Mulching
Various cultural practices such as mulching, the use of shelters, and raised beds are helpful for protection against high temperatures, heavy rains, and flooding. They also conserve soil health in terms of soil moisture and nutrient conservation required for crop production. The organic and inorganic mulches are commonly used for the production of high-valued cucurbitaceous vegetable crops, viz., gynoecious parthenocarpic cucumber hybrid, gynoecious bitter gourd, and summer squash, especially zucchini type either in open or in protected condition. These protective coverings help to reduce evaporation, moderate soil temperature, reduce soil runoff and erosion, protect fruits from direct contact with soil, and minimize weed growth. In addition, the use of organic materials as mulch can help to enhance soil fertility, structure and other soil properties. In India, mulching improved the growth of bottle gourd, round melon, ridge gourd, and sponge gourd compared to the non-mulched controls (Pandita and Singh 1992). Yields were the highest when polythene and sarkanda (Saccharum spp. and Canna spp.) were used as mulching materials. Planting cucurbitaceous vegetables in raised beds can ameliorate the effects of flooding during the rainy season.
13.3.3 Grafting: Tool for Stress Tolerance Under Climate Change Situation
Grafting in fruit trees is normally used to circumvent the problems associated with soil born biotic and abiotic factors. In vegetables including cucurbits, certain root stocks have been identified which possesses tolerance/resistance against such stresses. Grafting on these resistant/tolerant root stocks protects the crop from ill effects of soil born stresses. Some of root stocks identified cucurbits are given in Table 13.2.
13.4 Conclusion
Vulnerability assessment is a key requirement to know the possible impact of climate change and implement adaptation strategies and policies. Several tools have been developed for vulnerability assessment. The important ones are Community-based Risk Screening Tool-Adaptation and Livelihoods (CRiSTAL) developed by the International Institute for Sustainable Development and Assessment and Design for Adaptation to Climate Change: a Prototype Tool (ADAPT) developed by the World Bank. These models screen multiple regions, multiple sectors (agriculture, irrigation, biodiversity, infrastructure, etc.), reveal region-wise risks of climate change, and suggest options for adaptation.
To circumvent losses due to climate change, adaptation measures are essential in affected areas. Some of the possible adaptations for cucurbits under low to moderate climate change are given below.
-
1.
Early warning through value-added weather forecast systems is one of the most important components of adaptation measures. Forecasts on rains, storms, pest appearance, etc., would be highly useful to the farmers to schedule their activities.
-
2.
Breeding new varieties having tolerance to water stress and high temperatures are the best options to fight climate change.
-
3.
Short-season varieties due to their shorter vegetative periods can avoid unfavorable conditions.
-
4.
Adaptation to changed climatic conditions is also possible by adjusting planting dates. In some areas with intense weather change, this may lead to shifting of cropping seasons.
-
5.
Growing mixed varieties and intercropping are likely to reduce vulnerability of a field to climate change as well as incidence of pests.
-
6.
Mulching is helpful in many ways like raising organic content of the soil, improving water holding capacity, reducing runoff and erosion, and making more water available for plants.
-
7.
Micro-irrigation systems like drip irrigation can improve water-use efficiency, reduce fertilizer requirement, and improve productivity as well as quality.
Under severe climatic changes, the farmers are left with only two options, viz., abandonment cultivation of cucurbits or shifting in new areas where these can be grown economically.
References
Abul-Hayja Z, Peterson EE (1978) Anthracnose resistance in cucumber. Plant Dis Rep 62:43
Abul-Hayja Z, Williams PH, Peterson CE (1978) Inheritance of resistance to anthracnose and target leaf spot in Cucumbers. Plant Dis Rep 62:43–45
Ahn SJ, Im YJ, Chung GC, Cho BH, Suh SR (1999) Physiological responses of grafted-cucumber leaves and rootstock roots affected by low root temperature. Sci Hortic 81:397–408
AVRDC (2009) Crop and ecosystem management: management of cauliflower, lettuce, chili pepper, sweet pepper, and tomato. Asian Vegetable Research and Development Center, publication no 08–702, Shanhua
Barnes WC (1966) Development of multiple disease resistance hybrid cucumbers. Proc ASHS 89:390–393
Barnes WC, Epps WM (1952) Two types of anthracnose resistance in cucumbers. Plant Dis Rep 36:479–480
Bohn GW, Kishaba AN, Toba HH (1972) Mechanisms of resistance to melon aphid in a muskmelon line. Hortic Sci 7:281–282
Bohn GW, Whitaker TW (1964) Genetics of resistance to powdery mildew race 2 in muskmelon. Phytopathology 54:587–591
Chaves MM, Oliveira D (2004) Mechanisms underlying plant resilience to water deficits: prospects for water-saving agriculture. J Exp Bot 55:2365–2384
Choudhary BR, Fageria MS (2002) Breeding for multiple disease resistance in cucurbits (water melon, musk melon, cucumber and squash) - a review. Agric Rev 23(4):300–304
Choudhury B, Sivakami N (1972) Screening musk melon (Cucumis melo L) for breeding resistant to powdery mildew. Third Inst Symp Subtrop Trop Hortic 2:10
Copeland J (1957) Downy mildew in musk melon. Seed World 81(9):8
Cuartero J, Fernandez-Munoz R (1999) Tomato and salinity. Sci Hortic 78:83–125
Davis AR, Perkins-Veazie P, Dakata Y, Lopez-Galarza S, Maroto JV, Lee SG, Hyh YC, Sun Z, Miguel A, King SR, Cohen R, Lee JM (2008) Cucurbit grafting. Crit Rev Plant Sci 27:50–74
Den Nij APM (1982) CGMMV resistance in Cucumis anguria. Cucurbit Genet Coop Rep 5:57
Dhooria MS, Singh D, Shukla BS, Bhathol GS (1987) Differential response of watermelon accessions for resistance to red spider mite, Tetranvchus cinnaharinus (Boisduval). J Punjab Agric Univ 24:590–594
Elmstrom GW, Hopkins DL (1981) Resistance of watermelon cultivar to fusarium wilt. Plant Dis 65:825–827
FAO (2001) Climate variability and change: a challenge for sustainable agricultural production. Committee on agriculture, sixteenth session report, Rome, 26–30 March 2001
Flowers TJ (2004) Improving crop salt tolerance. J Exp Bot 55:307–319
Foolad MR (2004) Recent advances in genetics of salt tolerance in tomato. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 76:101–119
Gould F (1978) Resistance of cucumber varieties to Tetranychus urticae: genetic and environmental determinants. J Econ Entomol 71:680–683
Imam MK, Morkes H (1975) Downy mildew resistance in cucumber. Egypt J Genet Cytol 4:475–481
Ingram J, Bartels D (1996) The molecular basis of dehydration tolerance in plants. Annu Rev of Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 47:377–403
Karachi Z (1975) CMV resistance in musk melon. Phytopathology 65:479
Khan F (1973) Resistance to powdery mildew in muskmelon. In: Meeting of the melon working group of eucarpia, Avignon Montfavet, 19–27 June 1973
Khandelwal RC, Nath P (1978) Inheritance of resistance to fruit fly in water melon. Can J Genet Cytol 20:31–34
Lebeda A (1984) Screening of wild Cucumis species for resistance to cucumber powdery mildew (Erysiphe cichoracearum and Sphaerotheca fuliginea). Sci Hortic 24:241–249
Lecoq H, Pitrat M (1985) Specificity of the helper component mediated aphid transmission of three potyviruses infecting musk melon. Phytopathology 75:890–893
Lee JM (1994) Cultivation of grafted vegetables I. Current status, grafting methods, and benefits. Hortic Sci 29:235–239
Liao CT, Lin CH (1996) Photosynthetic response of grafted bitter melon seedling to flood stress. Environ Exp Bot 36:167–172
Lower RL, Edwards MD (1986) Cucumber breeding. In: Bassett MJ (ed) Breeding vegetable crops. AVI Publishing, Westport, pp 173–204
McCarty JJ, Canziani OF, Leary NA, Dokken DJ, White KS (2001) Climate change 2001. Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of working group II to the 3rd assessment report of the IPCC. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
Munger HM (1954) Delicious 51, an early Fusarium resistant musk melon. Farm Res 2(1):8
Munger HM (1979) The influence of temperature on resistance to powdery mildew in cucumber. Cucurbit Genet Cooperative Rep 2:9–10
Nandpuri KS (1993) Breeding musk melon for disease resistance. PAU J Res 30:125
Nath P (1973) Arka Manik a multiple disease resistant variety of water melon. SABRAO Newsl 5:71–79
Norton JD, Cosper RD (1985) Powdery mildew resistance in musk melon. Cucurbit Genet Cooperative Rep 8:46
Norton JD, Cosper RD (1989) AC-70-154, a gummy stem blight-resistant muskmelon breeding line. Hortic Sci 24:709–711
Omara S (1979) Dominant genes for resistance to powdery mildew (Sphaerotheca fuliginea poll.) in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Cucumber, Cornell University
Ort DR (2001) When there is too much light. Plant Physiol 125:29–32
Orton WA (1911) The development of disease resistant varieties of plant. In: Fourth international conference on quantitative genetics, pp 247–265
Otani T, Seike NM (2007) Rootstock control of fruit dieldrin concentration in grafted cucumber (Cucumis sativus). J Pestic Sci 32:235–242
Pandita ML, Singh N (1992) Vegetable production under water stress conditions in rainfed areas. In: Kuo CG (ed) Adaptation of food crops to temperature and water stress. AVRDC, Shanhua, pp 467–472
Parry M, Rosenzweig C, Livermore M (2005) Climate change, global food supply and risk of hunger. Phil Trans R Soc B 360:2125–2138
Phene CJ, McCormick RL, Miyamoto JM, Meek DW, Davis KR (1985) Evapotranspiration and crop coefficient of trickle-irrigated tomatoes. In: Proceedings of third international drip/trickle irrigation congress, Fresno, CA. ASAE publication no. 10–85 (2):823–831
Provvidenti R (1985) Sources of resistance to viruses in two accessions of Cucumis sativus. Cucurbit Genet Cooperative Rep 8:12
Provvidenti R, Hampton RO (1992) Sources of resistance to viruses in the Potyviridae. Arch Virol Suppl 5:189–211
Provvidenti R, Robinson RW (1977) Inheritance of resistance to watermelon mosaic virus 1 in Cucumis metuliferus. J Hered 68:56–57
Provvidenti R, Robinson RW, Munger HG (1978) Multiple virus resistance in Cucurbita species. Cucurbit Genet Cooperative Rep 1:26–27
Rivero RM, Ruiz JM, Sanchez E, Romero L (2003) Role of grafting in horticultural plants under stress conditions. Food Agric Environ 1:70–74
Robinson RW, Shail JW (1981) A cucumber mutant with increased hypocotyl and internode length. Cucurbit Genet Coop Rpt 4:19–20
Romero L, Belakbir A, Ragala L, Ruiz MJ (1997) Response of plant yield and leaf pigments to saline conditions: effectiveness of different rootstocks in melon plant (Cucumis melo L). Soil Sci Plant Nutr 3:855–862
Rouphael Y, Cardarelli M, Colla G, Rea E (2008) Yield, mineral composition, water relations, and water use efficiency of grafted mini-watermelon plants under deficit irrigation. Hortic Sci 43(3):730–736
Salma EA, Sill WH (1968) Distribution of cucurbits viruses in Kansas. Plant Dis Rep 52:11–14
Sambandam CN, Parthasarathy VA, Raj SA (1979) Reaction of certain form of Cucumis sp to Downey mildew. Auara 7(8):149–150
Seshadri US (1990) Cucurbits. In: Bose TK, Som MG (eds) Vegetable crops in India. Naya Prokash, India, pp 91–154
Seshadri VS (1986) Cucurbits. In: Bose TK, Som MG (eds) Vegetable crops in India. Naya Prokash, Calcutta
Shibuya T, Tokuda A, Terakura R, Shimizu-Maruo K, Sugiwaki H, Kitaya Y, Kiyota M (2007) Short-term bottom-heat treatment during low-air-temperature storage improves rooting in squash (Cucurbita moschata Duch.) cuttings used for rootstock of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). J Jpn Soc Hortic Sci 76:139–143
Singh PP (1996) Screening musk melon for downy mildew resistance. Ind Phytopathol 49:188–196
Sowell G, Corley WL (1969) Screening cucurbits for resistance to powdery mildew. Proc Ga Acad Sci 27:82
Suvanjrakorn K, Norton JD (1980) Anthracnose resistance in watermelon. J Am Soc Hort Sci 105:862
Tachibana S (1982) Comparison of effects of root temperature on the growth and mineral nutrition of cucumber cultivars and fig leaf gourd. J Jpn Soc Hortic Sci 51(3):299–308
Takada K, Kanazawa K, Takatuka K (1975) Studies on the breeding of melon for resistance to powdery mildew II. Inheritance of resistance to powdery mildew and correlation of resistance to other characters. Bull Veg Ornamental Crops Res Stn A2:11–31
Takeda KY, Gilbert JC (1975) Inheritance of resistance to watermelon mosaic virus 2 in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Hortic Sci 10:319
Trionfetti Nisini P, Colla G, Granati E, Temperini O, Crino P, Saccardo F (2002) Rootstock resistance to fusarium wilt and effect on fruit yield and quality of two muskmelon cultivars. Sci Hortic 93:281–288
Von Westarp S, Chieng S (2004) A comparison between low-cost drip irrigation, conventional drip irrigation, and hand watering in Nepal. Agric Water Manage 64:143–160
Wang HR, Ru SJ, Wang LP, Feng ZM (2004) Study on the control of Fusarium wilt and phytophthora blight in cucumber by grafting. Acta Agric Zhejiangensis 16:336–339
Wang J, Zhang DW, Fang Q (2002) Studies on antivirus disease mechanism of grafted seedless watermelon. J Anhui Agric Univ 29:336–339
Watterson JC, Williams PH, Durbin RD (1971) Response of cucurbits to Erwinia tracheiphila. Plant Dis Rep 55:816–819
Webb RE (1979) Inheritance of resistance to WMV in Cucumis melo L. Hortic Sci 14:265–266
Webb RE, Bohn GW (1962) WMV resistance in musk melon. Phytopathology 52:12–21
Whitner BFJ (1960) Breeding for downy mildew resistance in musk melon. Circ Univ Florida Agric Excp Stn, 5:122
Yetisir H, Caliskan ME, Soylu S, Sakar M (2006) Some physiological and growth responses of watermelon [Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Matsum. and Nakai] grafted onto Lagenaria siceraria to flooding. Environ Exp Bot 58:1–8
Zink FW, Gubler WD, Grogan RG (1983) Reaction of muskmelon germplasm to inoculation with Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. melonis race 2. Plant Dis 67:1251–1255
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer India
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Naik, P.S., Singh, M., Karmakar, P. (2013). Adaptation Options for Sustainable Production of Cucurbitaceous Vegetable Under Climate Change Situation. In: Singh, H., Rao, N., Shivashankar, K. (eds) Climate-Resilient Horticulture: Adaptation and Mitigation Strategies. Springer, India. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-0974-4_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-0974-4_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, India
Print ISBN: 978-81-322-0973-7
Online ISBN: 978-81-322-0974-4
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)