Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Storytelling und Bildung

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Elemente des Storytellings in Bildung, Kulturwissenschaften und Marketing

  • 1503 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Das als „unengagiert“ beschriebene Projekt zum digitalen Storytelling hat das Machtverhältnis zwischen Lehrern und Schülern neu definiert, und die Schüler reagierten darauf, indem sie Arbeiten produzierten, die meinungsstark und eindringlich waren und eine gründliche Auseinandersetzung mit akademischen Praktiken mithilfe von Technologien demonstrierten.

Wir beschreiben das Projekt und die Art und Weise, wie die Schüler in ihren digitalen Geschichten über ihre Ausbildung und ihre Zukunft sprechen.

Wir gehen davon aus, dass Lehrkräfte durch den sinnvollen Einsatz von Technologien im Unterricht allen Schülern, auch denjenigen, die nicht dem Mainstream zuzuordnen sind, eine effektivere, leistungsfähigere und ansprechendere Pädagogik bieten können.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 37.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  1. Pinnegar, S., & Hamilton., M.L. (2011). Narrating the tensions of teacher educator researcher in moving story to research. Narrative inquiries into curriculum making in teacher education advances in research on teaching, 13, 43–68.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Smyth, J. (2006). ‘When students have power’: Student engagement, student voice, and the possibilities for school reform around ‘dropping out’ of school. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 9(4), 285–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fine, M., & Weis, L. (2003). Silenced voices and extraordinary conversations: Re-imagining schools. New York: Teachers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Boltman, A., & Druin, A. (2003). Children’s storytelling technologies: Differences in elaboration and recall. Retrieved from https://drum.lib.umd.edu/handle/1903/1169

  5. Ng, W. (2015). Digital literacy: The overarching element for successful technology integration. New digital technology in education: Conceptualizing professional learning for educators (pp. 125–145). Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Smith, P. L., & Ragan, T. J. (2005). Instructional design (3rd ed.). Danvers, MA: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Robin, B. (2008). Digital storytelling: a powerful technology tool for the 21st century classroom. Theory Into Practice, 47, 220–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Schwan, S. & Riempp, R. (2004). The cognitive benefits of interactive videos: learning to tie nautical knots. Learning and Instruction, 14, 293–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fowler, J. (2002). Survey research methods (3rd ed.). Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cherrett, T., Wills, G., Price, J., Maynard, S., & Dror, I. E. (2009). Making training more cognitively effective: making videos interactive. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(6), 1124–1134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Delen, E., Liew, J., & Willson, V. (2014). Effects of interactivity and instructional scaffolding on learning: self-regulation in online video-based environments. Computers & Education, 78, 312–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Merkt, M., Weigand, S., Heier, A., & Schwan, S. (2011). Learning with videos vs. Learning with print: the role of interactive features. Learning and Instruction, 21, 687–704.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Merkt, M., & Schwan, S. (2014). Training the use of interactive videos: effects on mastering different tasks. Instructional Science, 42, 421–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang, D., Zhou, L., Briggs, R. O., & Nunamaker, J. F. (2006). Instructional video in e-learning: assessing the impact of interactive video on learning effectiveness. Information & Management, 43, 15–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. O’Flaherty, J., & Phillips, C. (2015). The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: a scoping review. The Internet and Higher Education, 25, 85–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Warren, A. E., Archambault, L. M., & Foley, R. W. (2014). Sustainability education framework for teachers: developing sustainability literacy through futures, values, systems, and strategic thinking. Journal of Sustainability Education, 6, 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Shephard, K. (2003). Questioning, promoting, and evaluating the use of streaming video to support student learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(3), 295–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hannafin, M. J. (1985). Empirical issues in the study of computer-assisted interactive video. Educational Communication and Technology, 33(4), 235–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. National Research Council. (2003). Committee on Undergraduate Biology Education to Prepare Research Scientists for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Dohn, N. B., & Dohn, N. B. (2017). Integrating Facebook in upper secondary biology instruction: a case study of students’ situational interest and participation in learning communication. Research in Science Education, 47(6), 1305–1329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Cross, C. T., Woods, T. A., & Schweingruber, H. (2009). Mathematics learning in early childhood: Paths toward excellence and equity. New York: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Blackwell, C. K., Lauricella, A. R., & Wartella, E. (2014). Factors influencing digital technology use in early childhood education. Computers and Education, 77, 82–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.04.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Enrique Hinostroza, J. (2018). New challenges for ICT in education policies in developing countries: The need to account for the widespread use of ICT for teaching and learning outside the school. In ICT-supported innovations in small countries and developing regions (pp. 99–119). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67657-9_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. O’Byrne, W. I., Houser, K., Stone, R., & White, M. (2018). Digital storytelling in early childhood: Student illustrations shaping social interactions. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01800

  25. The Digital Storytelling Association:The center for digital storytelling. 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Smeda N, Dakich E, Sharda N: Digital Storytelling with Web 2.0 Tools for Collaborative Learning. Collaborative Learning 2012, 145–163. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-0300-4.ch008

  27. Schmidt H, Norman G, Boshuizen HA: Cognitive prespective on medical expertise: Theory and implications. Acad Med. 1990, 65: 611–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Shank RC, Morson GS: Tell Me a Story: Narrative and Intelligence (Rethinking Theory). 1995, Evanston: Northwestern University Press

    Google Scholar 

  29. De Gallow : What is Problem-Based Learning?. [ http://www.pbl.uci.edu/whatispbl.htm ]

  30. Schools of California Online Resources for Education: What is Problem Based Learning?. [ http://score.rims.k12.ca.us/problearn.html ]

  31. Thomas RK, Pol LG, Sehnert WF: Health Care Book of Lists. 1994, Winter Park:GR Press

    Google Scholar 

  32. Ambulatory Pediatric Association: Educational Guidelines for Residency Training in General Pediatrics. Edited by: Kittredge D. 1996, McLean, VA

    Google Scholar 

  33. Ma, M., Oikonomou, A., & Lakhmi, C. J. (2011). Serious games and edutainment applications. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  34. Wiberg, C., & Jegers, K. (2003). Satisfaction and learnability in edutainment: A usability study of the knowledge game ‘Laser Challenge’ at the Nobel e-museum. Proceedings of HCI International – 10th International Conference on Human–Computer Interaction, Crete, Greece, pp. 1096–1102.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Salo, K., Zinin, V., Bauters, M., & Mikkonen, T. (2017). Modular audio story platform for museums. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces Companion (IUI ’17 Companion). ACM, New York, pp. 113–116.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Pietroni, E., Pagano, A., & Rufa, C. (2013) The Etruscanning project: Gesture-based interaction and user experience in the virtual reconstruction of the Regolini-Galassi tomb. In 2013 Digital Heritage International Congress (DigitalHeritage) (Vol. 2, pp. 653–660).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Pagano, A., Armone, G., & Sanctis, E. D. (2015). Virtual museums and audience studies: The case of ‘Keys to Rome’ exhibition. In 2015 Digital Heritage (Vol. 1, pp. 373–376).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Rizvic, S., et al. (2016). 4D virtual reconstruction of white bastion fortress. In C. E. Catalano & L. D. Luca (Eds.), Eurographics workshop on graphics and cultural heritage. Lyon: The Eurographics Association.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Nielsen, J. (1995). 10 usability heuristics for user interface design. Fremont, CA: Nielsen Norman Group.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Di Blas, N., & Paolini, P. (2013). Beyond the school’s boundaries: PoliCultura, a large-scale digital storytelling initiative. In T. Leo, L. Spalazzi, P. Ghislandi, & M. G. Ierardi (Eds.), Journal of Educational Technology & Society Special Issue on “Innovative Technologies for the Seamless Integration of Formal and Informal Learning” (Vol. 16, Issue 1, pp. 15–27).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Nashik, Indien

    Neeraj Karandikar

Authors
  1. Neeraj Karandikar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Nashik, India

    Neeraj Karandikar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Der/die Autor(en), exklusiv lizenziert an Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Karandikar, N. (2023). Storytelling und Bildung. In: Karandikar, N. (eds) Elemente des Storytellings in Bildung, Kulturwissenschaften und Marketing. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-66293-9_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-66293-9_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-66292-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-66293-9

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation