Skip to main content

Protection of Works Posted on the Internet Under Ukrainian Copyright Law

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Competition and Intellectual Property Law in Ukraine

Part of the book series: MPI Studies on Intellectual Property and Competition Law ((MSIP,volume 31))

  • 233 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter examines copyright protection and enforcement regarding works posted on the internet in light of the current Ukrainian and EU case-law practice. Along with the process of using a copyrighted work on the internet, the chapter focuses on four legal issues. First, the “making available of a work to the public” is discussed. This should be defined as a type of communication to the public in such a way that members of the public may access this work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them. Unlike current Ukrainian legislation, this interpretation corresponds with the provisions of the WIPO Copyright Treaty and the EU–Ukraine Association Agreement. The chapter goes on to examine the key issue of exhaustion of rights for works uploaded to the internet and provides reasons why exhaustion should not apply to posting works on the internet. Thirdly, the chapter analyzes copyright infringement types susceptible to taking place on the internet. In particular, it discusses the conditions under which the act of placing hyperlinks/framing/hotlinking to other websites and objects can be considered as the use of a work and, therefore, as copyright infringement. Finally, the chapter describes copyright enforcement for works posted on the internet by extrajudicial measures, including the Ukrainian version of the “notice and takedown” procedure.

Parts of Section 5 are a translation of the article Kostiantyn Zerov and Anna Shtefan, ‘Termination of Copyright and Related Rights Infringements on the Internet: a Review of Legislative Novelties’ (2017) 3 Theory and Practice of Intellectual Property journal 18 (19–23)”. The author is grateful for Anna Shtefan for consenting to including it here.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Association Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and Ukraine, of the other part OJ L161 (Association Agreement).

  2. 2.

    Ukrainian Law on Copyright and Related Rights 1994, 3792-XII, art 15.

  3. 3.

    Civil Code of Ukraine 2004, 435-IV, art 441.

  4. 4.

    Supreme Court of Ukraine, Resolution of the Plenum on the application by courts of the law in cases of protection of copyright and related rights 4 June 2010 No. 5, para 31.

  5. 5.

    Supreme Economic Court of Ukraine, Resolution of the Plenum on some issues of dispute resolution practice related to the protection of intellectual property rights 17 October 2012 No. 12, para 46.

  6. 6.

    Podilskyi District Court of Kyiv City, Decision 47686172 (2015) 758/4012/15-c; Holosiivskyi District Court of Kyiv City, Decision 24651132 (2012) 2601/7669/12.

  7. 7.

    Ukrainian Law on Copyright and Related Rights 1994, 3792-XII, art 1.

  8. 8.

    Civil Code of Ukraine 2004, 435-IV, art 441.

  9. 9.

    EU–Ukraine Association Agreement, art 173.

  10. 10.

    Agreed statements concerning the WIPO Copyright Treaty (1996) https://wipolex.wipo.int/en/text/295456 accessed 1 October 2021.

  11. 11.

    Parliament and of the Council Directive 2001/29/EC of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society (2001) OJ L167 (InfoSoc Directive), art 5(1).

  12. 12.

    Association Agreement, art 175.

  13. 13.

    Ukrainian Law on Copyright and Related Rights 1994, 3792-XII, art 1, 15.

  14. 14.

    WIPO Copyright Treaty (WCT) (1996).

  15. 15.

    WIPO Copyright Treaty (WCT) (1996), art 8.

  16. 16.

    InfoSoc Directive, arts 3, 4.

  17. 17.

    Association Agreement, art 178.

  18. 18.

    Eleonora Rosati, Copyright and the Court of Justice of the European Union (Oxford University Press 2019) 18.

  19. 19.

    ECJ C‑466/12 Nils Svensson and Others v. Retriever Sverige AB (2014) ECLI:EU:C:2014:76.

  20. 20.

    Justin Koo, The Right of Communication to the Public in EU Copyright Law (Hart Publishing, 2019) 47.

  21. 21.

    ECJ C-403/08 Football Association Premier League Ltd and Others v. QC Leisure and Others and C-429/08 Karen Murphy v. Media Protection Services Ltd (2011) ECLI:EU:C:2011:631, para 193.

  22. 22.

    Ukrainian Dictionary (1976) Volume 7, 723.

  23. 23.

    ECJ C-135/10 Società Consortile Fonografici (SCF) v. Marco Del Corso (2012) ECLI:EU:C:2012:140, para 86.

  24. 24.

    ECJ C-89/04 Mediakabel BV v. Commissariaat voor de Media (2005) ECLI:EU:C:2005:348, para 30; ECJ C-192/04 Lagardère Active Broadcast v. Société pour la perception de la rémunération équitable (SPRE) and Gesellschaft zur Verwertung von Leistungsschutzrechten mbH (GVL) (2005) ECLI:EU:C:2005:475, para 31; ECJ C-306/05 Sociedad General de Autores y Editores de España (SGAE) v. Rafael Hoteles SA (2006) ECLI:EU:C:2006:764, para 37; ECJ C-607/11 ITV Broadcasting Ltd and Others v. TVCatchUp Ltd (2013) ECLI:EU:C:2013:147, paras 32–34.

  25. 25.

    Sergey Zjatyckyj, Konstantyn Leont’ev and Vasiliy Terleckij, ‘Copyright on the Internet: Three Stages of One Process’ (2001) 8 Intellectual Property 5 (7).

  26. 26.

    Kostiantyn Zerov, Features of Copyright Protection for Works Posted on the Internet (Interservis 2018) 35.

  27. 27.

    InfoSoc Directive, art 3.

  28. 28.

    Parliament and of the Council Directive 2009/24/EC of 23 April 2009 on the Legal Protection of Computer Programs OJ L111, 16–22, art 4(2).

  29. 29.

    ECJ C‑128/11 UsedSoft GmbH v. Oracle International Corp., (2012) ECLI:EU:C:2012:407, para 89.

  30. 30.

    Ukrainian Law on Copyright and Related Rights 1994, 3792-XII, arts 1, 15.

  31. 31.

    Supreme Economic Court of Ukraine, Resolution of the Plenum on some issues of dispute resolution practice related to the protection of intellectual property rights of 17 October 2012 No. 12, para 40.

  32. 32.

    Ukrainian Law on Copyright and Related Rights 1994, 3792-XII, Art. 50.

  33. 33.

    Ibid.

  34. 34.

    Ibid.

  35. 35.

    Supreme Economic Court of Ukraine, Decision 57169375 (2016) 916/4567/14.

  36. 36.

    Supreme Economic Court of Ukraine, Resolution of the Plenum on some issues of dispute resolution practice related to the protection of intellectual property rights of 17 October 2012 No. 12, para 51-2.

  37. 37.

    Jaani Riordan, The Liability of Internet Intermediaries (Oxford University Press 2016) 6.01.

  38. 38.

    Ukrainian Law on E-commerce 2015, 675-VIII, art 9.

  39. 39.

    Ukrainian Law on Copyright and Related Rights 1994, 3792-XII, art 52-1.

  40. 40.

    Ukrainian Law on Copyright and Related Rights 1994, 3792-XII, art 52-1(15).

  41. 41.

    ECJ C‑466/12 Nils Svensson and Others v. Retriever Sverige AB (2014) ECLI:EU:C:2014:76.

  42. 42.

    ECJ C-160/15 GS Media BV v. Sanoma Media Netherlands BV and Others (2015) ECLI:EU:C:2016:644.

  43. 43.

    ECJ C-160/15 GS Media BV v. Sanoma Media Netherlands BV and Others (2015) ECLI:EU:C:2016:644, para 49.

  44. 44.

    Supreme Economic Court of Ukraine, Resolution of the Plenum on some issues of dispute resolution practice related to the protection of intellectual property rights of 1 October 2012 No. 12, para 55.

  45. 45.

    ECJ C-160/15 GS Media BV v. Sanoma Media Netherlands BV and Others (2015) ECLI:EU:C:2016:644, para 47.

  46. 46.

    Ibid para 51.

  47. 47.

    Supreme Economic Court of Ukraine, Resolution of the Plenum on some issues of dispute resolution practice related to the protection of intellectual property rights of 17 October 2012 No. 12, para 46 (italicization by author).

  48. 48.

    ECJ C‑348/13 BestWater International GmbH v. Michael Mebes and Stefan Potsch (2014) ECLI:EU:C:2014:2315, para 20.

  49. 49.

    See Anna Shtefan and Olga Gurgula ‘The New Intellectual Property Court in Ukraine: Its Creation and Exclusive Jurisdiction’ in this Volume.

  50. 50.

    Ukrainian Law on Copyright and Related Rights 1994, 3792-XII, art 52-1.

  51. 51.

    Ukrainian Law on E-commerce 2015, 675-VIII, art 9(4).

  52. 52.

    Ukrainian Law on Copyright and Related Rights 1994, 3792-XII, art 52-1(13).

References

  • Justin Koo, The Right of Communication to the Public in EU Copyright Law (Hart publishing 2019)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaani Riordan, The Liability of Internet Intermediaries (Oxford University Press 2016)

    Google Scholar 

  • Eleonora Rosati, Copyright and the Court of Justice of the European Union (Oxford University Press 2019)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ukrainian Dictionary (1976) Volume 7 [Cлoвник Укpaїнcькoї Moви (1976) Чacтинa 7]

    Google Scholar 

  • Kostiantyn Zerov, Features of Copyright Protection for Works Posted on the Internet (Interservis 2018) [Кocтянтин Зepoв, Ocoбливocтi Зaxиcтy Aвтopcькиx Пpaв нa Tвopи, Poзмiщeнi в Mepeжi Iнтepнeт (Iнтepcepвic 2018)]

    Google Scholar 

  • Kostiantyn Zerov and Anna Shtefan, ‘Termination of Copyright and Related Rights Infringements on the Internet: a Review of Legislative Novelties’ (2017) 3 Theory and Practice of Intellectual Property journal 18 [Зepoв Кocтянтин тa Aннa Штeфaн, ‘Пpипинeння Пopyшeнь Aвтopcькoгo Пpaвa i Cyмiжниx Пpaв y Mepeжi Iнтepнeт: Oгляд Зaкoнoдaвчиx Hoвeл’ (2017) 3 Teopiя i Пpaктикa Iнтeлeктyaльнoї Bлacнocтi 18]

    Google Scholar 

  • Sergey Zjatyckyj, Konstantyn Leont'ev and Vasiliy Terleckij ‘ Copyright on the Internet: Three Stages of One Process’ (2001) 8 Yntellektualjnaja Sobstvennost 5 [Cepгeй Зятицкий, Кoнcтaнтин Лeoнтьeв, Bacилий Tepлeцкий ‘Aвтopcкoe Пpaвo в Интepнeтe: Tpи Cтaдии Oднoгo Пpoцecca’ (2001) 8 Интeллeктyaльнaя Coбcтвeннocть 5]

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kostiantyn Zerov .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Zerov, K. (2023). Protection of Works Posted on the Internet Under Ukrainian Copyright Law. In: Richter, H. (eds) Competition and Intellectual Property Law in Ukraine. MPI Studies on Intellectual Property and Competition Law, vol 31. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-66101-7_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-66101-7_21

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-66100-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-66101-7

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics