Zusammenfassung
Oftmals wird vermutet, dass Intelligenz und Kreativität unverbunden (oder sogar einander abträglich) seien; dies ist beim Menschen nicht der Fall. Vor diesen Hintergrund reflektiert dieser Beitrag aus einer psychologischen Perspektive, als wie kreativ eine Künstliche Intelligenz angesehen werden kann. Hierbei werden Aspekte adressiert wie die (domänenübergreifende) Generalisierung einer intelligenzbezogenen Leistung, Problemlösungen in Wahrscheinlichkeiten und der modulare Aufbau eines intelligenten Systems. Es werden Anregungen gegeben für die organisationale Implementation kreativitätsausgerichteter Künstlicher Intelligenzen.
„If you’re not embarrassed by the first version of your product, you’ve launched too late.“
GPT-3
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Literatur
Batey, M., Furnham, A., & Safiullina, X. (2010). Intelligence, general knowledge and personality as predictors of creativity. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(5), 532–535.
Beaty, R. E., & Silvia, P. J. (2012). Why do ideas get more creative across time? An executive interpretation of the serial order effect in divergent thinking tasks. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6(4), 309–319.
Betzel, R. F., Medaglia, J. D., Papadopoulos, L., Baum, G. L., Gur, R., Gur, R., & Bassett, D. S. (2017). The modular organization of human anatomical brain networks: Accounting for the cost of wiring. Network Neuroscience, 1(1), 42–68.
Evens, A., Hryhorczuk, D., Lanphear, B. P., Rankin, K. M., Lewis, D. A., Forst, L., & Rosenberg, D. (2015). The impact of low-level lead toxicity on school performance among children in the Chicago public schools: A population-based retrospective cohort study. Environmental Health, 14, 21.
Frith, E., Elbich, D. B., Christensen, A. P., Rosenberg, M. D., Chen, Q., Kane, M. J., Silvia, P. J., Seli, P., & Beaty, R. E. (2020). Intelligence and creativity share a common cognitive and neural basis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. Advance online publication.
Gajda, A., Karwowski, M., & Beghetto, R. A. (2017). Creativity and academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(2), 269–299.
Gleave, A., Dennis, M., Wild, C., Kant, N., Levine, S., & Russell, S. (2019). Adversarial policies: Attacking deep reinforcement learning. ArXiv, 1905.10615. (Visualisierung siehe: https://adversarialpolicies.github.io).
Isola, P., Zhu, J.-Y., Zhou, T. & Efros A. A. (2018). Image-to-image translation with conditional adversarial networks. ArXiv, 1611.07004. (Visualisierung siehe: https://affinelayer.com/pixsrv).
Kaufman, S. B., Quilty, L. C., Grazioplene, R. G., Hirsh, J. B., Gray, J. R., Peterson, J. B., & DeYoung, C. G. (2016). Openness to experience and intellect differentially predict creative achievement in the arts and sciences. Journal of Personality, 84(2), 248–258.
Kim, K. H. (2005). Can only intelligent people be creative? A meta-analysis. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 16(2–3), 57–66.
Lacker, K. (6. July 2020). Giving GPT-3 a turing test. Kevin Lacker’s blog. https://lacker.io/ai/2020/07/06/giving-gpt-3-a-turing-test.html.
MacDonald, K. (2014). Domain-general mechanisms: What they are, how they evolved, and how they interact with modular, domain-specific mechanisms to enable cohesive human groups. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 37(4), 430–431.
Mattson, M. P. (2019). An evolutionary perspective on why food overconsumption impairs cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23(3), 200–212.
Nusbaum, E. C., & Silvia, P. J. (2011). Are intelligence and creativity really so different? Fluid intelligence, executive processes, and strategy use in divergent thinking. Intelligence, 39(1), 36–45.
Olteţeanu, A. M., & Falomir, Z. (2016). Object replacement and object composition in a creative cognitive system. Towards a computational solver of the alternative uses test. Cognitive Systems Research, 39, 15–32.
Ritchie, S. J., & Tucker-Drob, E. M. (2018). How much does education improve intelligence? A Meta-analysis. Psychological Science, 29(8), 1358–1369.
Said-Metwaly, S., Fernández-Castilla, B., Kyndt, E., & Van den Noortgate, W. (2020). Testing conditions and creative performance: Meta-analyses of the impact of time limits and instructions. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 14(1), 15–38.
Spörrle, M., Tumasjan, A., Becker, F., & Moser, K. (2008). „…but the name will never be forgotten“ – Eine Bestandsaufnahme der Psychologie des Markennamens. Wirtschaftspsychologie, 10(4), 5–14.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 Der/die Autor(en), exklusiv lizenziert durch Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE, ein Teil von Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Spörrle, M., Hofreiter, S. (2022). Wie kreativ kann Künstliche Intelligenz sein? Eine psychologische Reflexion. In: Landes, M., Steiner, E., Utz, T. (eds) Kreativität und Innovation in Organisationen . Springer Gabler, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-63117-1_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-63117-1_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-63116-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-63117-1
eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)